Keywords
paid sex use, prostitution, depression, failure of genital response, erectile disorder, girlfriend-experience, sex worker, sex-work-model, oppression-model, Arizona Sexual Experience Scale
paid sex use, prostitution, depression, failure of genital response, erectile disorder, girlfriend-experience, sex worker, sex-work-model, oppression-model, Arizona Sexual Experience Scale
Paid sex behavior, either giving or receiving money, is a delicate matter for psychiatric patients. Patients rarely talk about this taboo subject spontaneously, and habitually psychiatrists tend not to ask about it. In contrast, prostitution use is frequent; 18% of American men paid for sex in their past, and 3% of them did so during the year before inquiry1. 2% of American women have received money for sex during their lifetime1.
We hypothesize that the personal and therapeutic attitude of health professionals towards paid sex is often ambivalent and leans towards the avoidance of the topic. There are multiple reasons for this such as the reduced importance of the topic in medical education and in psychiatry-training, a certain degree of idealizing the patient as not being prone to morally questionable behavior and, no apparent clues in the patient’s presentation and in his narrative.
We think that particularly in young men, asking actively about and understanding prostitution consumption may benefit their psychiatric and psychotherapeutic treatment. In our experience, investigating a patient’s hidden motives behind paying for sex can help patients to achieve greater inner and relational freedom.
Mr. A, a small and shy 30 year old male, was born in a north-western Portuguese village near an internationally renowned Casino-beach-resort and lived there until the age of 18. He is the only son of a working-class couple, who are both in paid employment. Mr. A attended a college in Lisbon, which was a three hour drive from his parent’s home. None of his peers from the village went to college; Mr. A was a driven individual and achieved his goal of furthering his education.
At home his parents always quarreled about his father’s infidelities, but despite this they stayed together to finance his studies. When they divorced after his graduation, he felt dejected and gradually developed a depressive state. His depressive symptoms lasted for 12 months before he came for a consultation to the F+F Gysin, Private Psychiatric Practice. As well as his parents’ divorce, he broke two toes during a kick-boxing session, which caused him to stop practicing his favorite sport. During this period he also started to date a girl who compared to him had a poor education and no fixed job. Because of this, she envied him for his higher income and thus she was unfaithful to him. The culmination of these reasons and a poor performance in his engineering job, he was encouraged by his friends and pressured by his superiors at work to see a psychiatrist, whom he selected from a health insurance list.
During his first sessions in September 2011 he referred to having a low mood, which stemmed from being resentful for not being promoted at work, a lack of motivation, social isolation and an irrational fear of being attacked in a familiar and secure night club. He had outbursts with friends, suffered from anhedonia, a lesser sexual drive, a fear of losing his hair and gaining weight. He was also particularly dysphoric of his small height of 1,59m. He wanted help but without medication.
For Mr. A, paid sex was not a problematic issue, nor a direct motive for his consultation. When questioned about his sex-life he was comfortable talking about his experiences, and showed a degree of consumer pride in prostitution. At the age of 22, after breaking up a four-year relationship, out of curiosity and revenge, he purchased for the first time sexual services in a sex-worker’s apartment. This use of prostitution escalated when back in his native village, where a Saturday night ritual with a group of friends started. After dinner with their girlfriends, the group would take their partners home and then all the males would leave them to visit a brothel to have a drink, fun and sometimes have paid sex with prostitutes using protection. This kind of prostitution use became a peer group standard and, for Mr. A, it seemed to be an easy victory over his shyness.
Mr. A became hooked and hyper-seduced2 by a specific prostitute, and he fantasized about living with her in what he described as an ‘exotic land’. However, to have or to maintain a full erection during paid sex he needed to think and imagine that he was making love to a romantic partner. The patient referred to exclusive heterosexual orientation and sexual desire, however revealed that he would suffer a loss of erection when either nervous or stressed.
The Arizona Sexual Experience Scale3 is composed of five questions. As we can see in Figure 1, for Mr. A, paid sex (red circles) is less exciting and less intense compared to romantic sex (green circles).
The informal Social Atom4 is a drawing that the patient was asked to create, drawing circles to represent his most important relationships and favorite past-times (see Figure 2). The proximity to the subject (the middle circle) indicates the importance of these to him. Mr. A’s social atom showed close relationships to his parents, friends and pets and also confirmed his problematic affective intimacy with women.
We can describe Mr. A’s relationship dynamics by the means of anamnestic data and through his behavior in the therapeutic setting. We followed the Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnostic-procedure5.
Mr. A felt that he was not being recognized in his efforts to fulfill or please others. Often arriving late to dates with girlfriends, he not only refused to apologize, but also expected them to listen supportively to his complaints. He implicitly asked too much of others without being aware of it, and then found himself surprised by the negative responses he would receive, and found this negativity unjustified and rejecting. He felt an imbalance between giving and receiving, which reinforced his fears of intimacy (see Figure 3).
With his paid sex encounters, he tried to escape from this cycle. After sex for money, he felt that afterwards, nobody is in debt with anyone. He looked for a “girlfriend experience” free from any affective claims. His internalized couple model is characterized by infidelity, hostility and matrimonial warfare.
For Mr. A, paid sex had many simultaneous non-sexual functions, which follow Willy Pasini’s list of Non-sexual Functions of Sex6: sex as tranquilizer and antidepressive for his symptoms, as identity-support and socializer in his peer group as well as power-tool and object of exchange with women. The intrapsychic function of paid sex seems to be a narcissistic first-aid kit.
Mr. A was diagnosed with depressive episode, moderate to severe, with mild psychotic symptoms (ICD-10: F33.2)7 and failure of genital response (episodic erectile dysfunction in a paid sex setting) (ICD-10: F52.2). Paid sex activity in general may hide the aspect of a disorder of impulse control8, however this was not present with Mr. A. Addictive and obsessive traits in his paid sex behavior were ruled out. A weekly psychotherapeutic treatment was proposed and started in monotherapy, without anti-depressive medication. The patient showed high therapy-motivation and good compliance. He accepted the therapy-program and during a period of 14 months, Mr. A attended 40 hourly sessions.
The patient gradually improved without psychotropic medication and took three weeks off work as sick-leave and three weeks off work for overdue vacations. He quickly changed to a more challenging and better rewarded job and started up kick-boxing again. Socializing better in his new job, he continued to be solitary in his private life and started to commit time to his newly adopted dog (which coincidently was his mother’s favorite activity).
Moreover, he reduced his peer-group paid sexual activities but still dissipated his energy by regular night-life, drinking and paid sex consumption. His sentimental life still revolved around his problematic girlfriend, whom he had chosen when he was depressed.
To understand the patient’s pattern of paid sex consumption and the therapeutic attitude and reaction of the therapist, it is important to understand the actual positions and knowledge about prostitution. There is general agreement that one should distinguish clearly between street and indoor prostitution9. Street prostitution is seen as implying frequent health-risks for workers with a high degree of victimization and oppression, while indoor prostitution subject to much debate.
There are two main prostitution theories which explain and deal with indoor prostitution: the “Sex-Work model”10 and the “Oppression model”11. The first proposes legalization of prostitution as a way to earn a living, and for harm reduction, minimizing risks for sex workers and consumers. The second focuses on exploitation, victimization and abuse of women and is usually adopted by feminist movements11 and right-wing conservatives for different reasons10.
Portugal does not criminalize prostitution, but linked economic activities are illegal, like renting an apartment for prostitution work. There is no regulation, and sex workers are without legal protection and do not benefit from systematic harm reduction strategies. In general, prostitution does not seem to be on sexological or political agendas and very few studies about prostitution-users are available12.
Although the patient suffered from a moderate to severe depressive episode, with mild psychotic signs, no medication was given in response to the patients’ wishes and following the tendency of psychiatrists to follow a “watchful waiting” approach. Official therapeutic recommendations in Germany and Switzerland state: “When a unique therapeutic approach is planned in patients suffering from moderate to severe acute depressive episodes, treatable in outdoor-setting, exclusive psychotherapy should have the same importance as exclusive medication when the method of treatment is chosen”13.
The attitudes of psychiatrists and psychotherapists to paid sex are rarely examined. With the clinician, a professional tolerant and neutral position may coexist with a private negative sensibility about prostitution. Unintentionally, this may result in a negative judgment of paid sex and avoidance of the patient’s narratives of paid sex behavior.
Fátima Gysin (the therapist of Mr. A) specialized in sexology in a sexological and psychosomatic consultation at the University of Geneva headed by Willy Pasini. In Portugal, in the private practice setting, she has treated an up-scale sex-worker for depression and anxiety unrelated to her professional activity. The patient valued her work and was determined to continue indoor, top-level prostitution. In this context, exploitation, misery and victimization are absent or less visible and sex-work appears to be frequently a free choice of profession.
One question is the degree of communication of the therapist’s personal moral, ethical or political stance to the patient. Sometimes the therapeutic process is better served by the therapist’s auto-disclosure, while generally non-disclosure is recommended14.
Although it wasn’t a reason for consultation nor was it presented as a symptom, it was essential to Mr. A’s psychiatric treatment for his depressive disorder to open up his paid sex habits. The therapy helped him to make sense of and give meaning to his struggle with intimacy. The change from his depressive mood was probably facilitated by the interest given to the significance of his paid sex experience. On different levels, prostitution use can be simultaneously a symptom, a free choice and a cultural pattern. In depressed men seeking psychiatric or psychotherapeutic help, an active exploration of any existing paid sex experiences can be useful.
Written informed consent for publication of the clinical details was obtained from the patient. Permission has been solicited by e-mail for publishing the results of the Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX).
The paper is based on an oral presentation given during the 11th Congress of the European Federation for Sexology in Madrid, September 19–22, 2012, presented by the first author who is the patient’s psychiatrist and psychotherapist.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 2 (update) 29 May 13 |
read | read |
Version 1 04 Mar 13 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)