ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Editorial

The Global Virus Network’s testimony on Ebola to the U.S. Senate

[version 1; peer review: not peer reviewed]
PUBLISHED 15 Dec 2014
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
NOT PEER REVIEWED

This article is included in the Emerging Diseases and Outbreaks gateway.

This article is included in the Ebola Virus collection.

Abstract

In this Editorial I briefly outline the Global Virus Network’s testimony to the recent U.S. Senate’s “Fighting Ebola and Protecting America” committee hearing.

Editorial

This past November, the Global Virus Network (GVN) was invited by the U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations to submit testimony at a hearing on “U.S. Government Response: Fighting Ebola and Protecting America”1. In our testimony, my colleagues and I outlined several propositions, some of which were drawn from my personal experiences in the early and subsequent days of the AIDS epidemic. We recommended expanded resources for basic science research to accelerate answers to questions about the source of the Ebola outbreak, human-to-human transmission modes, mutations and vaccines, among other necessary endeavors. We noted the importance of the U.S. government leveraging previous successes to advance translation of basic science discoveries into products that could be distributed across the globe as appropriate. It was important to highlight in the testimony that some of the important tools we are lacking in the current Ebola outbreak include proper diagnostics to detect virus infection before individuals are symptomatic. We noted the importance of science-driven communications as another important tool in disease prevention, and offered to host webinars to educate journalists reporting on the outbreak. Last, but certainly not least, it is important to expand medical virology training programs in affected nations to promote broad skills in detection and analysis of an array of viruses. Further, education and training in biosafety laboratory practices and the handling of blood products is important and lacking in Ebola-stricken West African nations.

The GVN supports F1000Research’s Ebola Collection initiative that enables all Ebola-related knowledge to be made available on a single open access platform within days of submission, including prioritization of those accepted and published free of charge. This initiative aligns with the GVN’s mission to advance research on all viral diseases, including those with pandemic potential; to train the next generation of medical virologists; to educate the public on viral threats and scientific responses; and to advocate for support for the medical virology field. The GVN is a coalition of leading medical virologists based in 31 GVN Centers of Excellence in 25 nations, including the U.S., India, China, Sweden, Germany, Italy, South Africa, the U.K., Argentina and Russia -- and it is growing. For our complete testimony, please click here2.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 15 Dec 2014
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Gallo RC. The Global Virus Network’s testimony on Ebola to the U.S. Senate [version 1; peer review: not peer reviewed]. F1000Research 2014, 3:307 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.5954.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status:
NOT PEER REVIEWED
NOT PEER REVIEWED

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 15 Dec 2014
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.