ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Editorial

The Bioconductor channel in F1000Research

[version 1; peer review: not peer reviewed]
PUBLISHED 10 Jul 2015
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
NOT PEER REVIEWED

This article is included in the Bioconductor gateway.

Abstract

Bioconductor (bioconductor.org) is a rich source of software and know-how for the integrative analysis of genomic data. The Bioconductor channel in F1000Research provides a forum for task-oriented workflows that each cover a solution to a current, important problem in genome-scale data analysis from end to end, invoking resources from several packages by different authors, often combining multiple `omics data types, and demonstrating integrative analysis and modelling techniques.

Keywords

Bioconductor, bioinformatics, genomics, systems biology, R, statistical computing

Editorial

Bioinformatics is a wonderful field, since so many of the researchers who develop new concepts, methods and tools have embraced the sharing of their research outputs as free, open-source software. This openness has, no doubt, accelerated the breathtaking progress in the field of genomics (and related `omic technologies). Bioconductor (bioconductor.org) has become a place that many developers are choosing to host their software - it gives them a useful infrastructure for development and for providing effective user support1. It is also a venue where many prospective users go to when they look for a quality solution in genome-scale data analysis, where they will find some of the most advanced tools.

This abundance of tools, however, can be difficult to navigate. Bioconductor comes in two parts: as a collection of individual packages, each developed independently by a research group somewhere on the globe, and often among the experts in their field; and as a layer of infrastructure, with common data structures and core library functionality to glue the packages together and provide, as we call it, 'interoperability'. Many of the individual packages are exquisitely documented by their authors, but there has been less on offer, so far, at the level of cross-package, task-centered workflows. The questions 'What can I do with this particular package?’ and ‘How do I approach my particular problem?’ are subtly different. Users care about the latter. With the Bioconductor channel in F1000Research, we aim to provide a place, and the incentives, for scientists to create and publish such task-oriented workflows. Each workflow will cover a solution to a current, important problem in genome-scale data analysis from end to end; it will invoke resources from several packages from different authors; it will often combine multiple `omics data types and demonstrate integrative analysis and modelling techniques; and it will be by written by scientists who need not be the developers of any of the used packages. We hope that the workflows will make it easier for new and existing users to navigate the offerings of R (http://www.r-project.org) and Bioconductor, to adapt workflows to their needs, and to rapidly find solutions for their problems.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 10 Jul 2015
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Huber W, Carey VJ, Davis S et al. The Bioconductor channel in F1000Research [version 1; peer review: not peer reviewed]. F1000Research 2015, 4:217 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6758.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status:
NOT PEER REVIEWED
NOT PEER REVIEWED

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 10 Jul 2015
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.