ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Editorial

Oxygen-binding and sensing proteins

[version 1; peer review: not peer reviewed]
PUBLISHED 09 Jan 2015
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
NOT PEER REVIEWED

This article is included in the Oxygen-binding and sensing proteins collection.

Abstract

This collection of papers is a snapshot of topics presented at the international conference on Oxygen-Binding and Sensing Proteins (O2BiP) held in Sheffield, UK, on 6th-10th July 2014. The collection will grow over time as new papers relating to O2BiP topics are completed and published.

Keywords

oxygen-binding protein, heme, globin, sensing protein

Editorial

The meeting held in Sheffield, UK, on 6th–10th July 2014 was the 18th on the topic of oxygen-binding and sensing proteins (O2BiP). Previous meetings were held in Parma (Italy, 2012) and previously in Aarhus, Naples etc. This meeting has never been held in the UK, despite a long tradition of top-flight research in ligand binding to heme proteins, oxidative metabolism, bioenergetics and protein biochemistry. It is particularly appropriate that the meeting should be held in Sheffield because of a rich tradition of world-class research in the area of oxidative biochemistry, bioenergetics, and ligand-heme protein interactions. Among the luminaries who have worked in Sheffield are Lord Porter, Sir Hans Krebs, Gregorio Weber, Vincent Massey and Quentin Gibson.

Oxygen-binding proteins are arguably the most intensively studied of all proteins1. The field has been revolutionised in recent years by paradigm shifts in our understanding of these proteins. Among these developments are (i) the discovery of globins in numerous animal species, plants and microbes, with important implications for globin evolution2,3, (ii) the recognition that the ligand binding and catalytic capability of ‘oxygen-binding proteins’ actually embraces physiologically critical ligands such as nitric oxide and hydrogen sulfide4,5, (iii) the sheer number of globins encoded by simple genomes6, and (iv) the multiple roles of oxygen-binding proteins in natural environments and disease.

These meetings have always emphasized both the structure and function of globins and oxygen-related proteins at all levels of organisation from the molecular and cellular to the whole organism. These meetings have also demonstrated a remarkably multidisciplinary approach to the area, with contributions extending from molecular biophysics, to biochemistry and physiology and whole organism functions. Although primarily an experimental subject area, newer computational tools have proved important in evolutionary studies and modelling of ligand-protein interactions. The subject has considerable potential for contributing to knowledge that can be applied to the development of agriculture and medicine and to understanding the impacts of human activity on living organisms and ecosystems.

The collection of papers here is merely a snapshot of a remarkably diverse and exciting meeting. It included more than 50 lectures and 30 posters. The organisers of this O2BiP were anxious to involve younger, early career scientists in the meeting and some of these contributions can be seen in this collection.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 09 Jan 2015
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Poole RK. Oxygen-binding and sensing proteins [version 1; peer review: not peer reviewed]. F1000Research 2015, 4:5 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6017.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status:
NOT PEER REVIEWED
NOT PEER REVIEWED

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 09 Jan 2015
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.