ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Opinion Article

Zika virus emergency in Brazil: scientific challenges and early developments

[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
PUBLISHED 04 Aug 2016
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Emerging Diseases and Outbreaks gateway.

Abstract

The epidemic of microcephaly and other congenital abnormalities associated with Zika virus which emerged in Brazil now threatens different countries worldwide. Since the declaration of a National Public Health Emergency, the Brazilian government has implemented a response plan in which the research agenda is central. Developments were achieved in four main areas of the agenda: 1) virological, clinical and epidemiological studies, 2) alternative vector control strategies, 3) development and evaluation of diagnostic tests, and 4) development and evaluation of vaccines. National and international collaborative networks have played an important role in the race against the clock to quickly translate the results of R&D initiatives into public policies. It is paramount that the lessons learned from Zika lead to fast and effective responses to future epidemics.

Keywords

Zika virus, epidemic, microcephaly, Aedes Aegypti, vector control, scientific agenda

In the last decades, Brazil has faced different arbovirus epidemics. However, none of them had the complexity of Zika virus and associated diseases. In April 2015, the first cases of the virus were reported in the country1. Initially, the occurrence was considered to be of no greater threat than dengue or chikungunya. Nonetheless, by the end of October, the number of microcephaly cases started to rise sharply, which triggered a thorough investigation and subsequently the declaration of a National Public Health Emergency2,3. On December 5, the President of Brazil launched the National Microcephaly Response Plan, involving 19 institutions and structured on three pillars: 1) vector control, 2) health care, and 3) research & education2.

The research agenda focused on four main areas: 1) virological, clinical and epidemiological studies, 2) alternative vector control strategies, 3) development and evaluation of diagnostic tests, and 4) development and evaluation of vaccines. After almost one year since the reporting of the first cases of microcephaly associated with Zika in the country, many developments in the agenda were achieved and other challenges emerged:

1) Virological, clinical, and epidemiological studies – Researchers in Brazil were able to characterize transplacental Zika transmission and its influence in halting neurological development4,5. These findings supported campaigns to increase awareness and protection of pregnant women against mosquitoes. Although Zika seems to be the main culprit of microcephaly increase, other cofactors are under investigation, what may lead to new policies to tackle other risk factors6. Recent studies also suggest that the consequences of Zika infection go beyond microcephaly, pointing out the need to further characterize syndromes and related diseases as well as to revise diagnostic and management protocols7.

2) Alternative vector control strategies – After the Zika emergency was declared, a range of new vector control strategies were proposed, which target different phases of the mosquito life cycle and different settings. The Brazilian Ministry of Health has been promoting effectiveness evaluations of promising strategies, including Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes and mosquito-driven dissemination of pyriproxyfen8,9. These studies will provide invaluable information to improve Aedes control policies in Brazil. Entomological studies have also been investigating if Aedes Aegypti is the only Zika virus vector in Brazil10. This is a crucial point because other mosquito species have different breeding and feeding habits; in which case, the results of these studies may have an important impact on vector control measures.

3) Development and evaluation of diagnostic tests – Since the first cases of Zika have been identified there has been an ongoing effort to improve molecular tests and to develop highly sensitive and specific serological tests, with limited cross-reaction with other arbovirus, allowing point-of-care utilization11. Candidates have arisen from private and public initiatives, which are being validated and evaluated with support from the Brazilian Ministry of Health. The inclusion of such tests in the public health system will require training of health professionals and modifying follow-up protocols. As the spectrum of Zika consequences widens, so does the need for detection and treatment.

4) Development and evaluation of vaccines – The development of an effective and secure vaccine against Zika has been one of the main goals worldwide. Different research groups are working on that, including groups in Brazil. Nonetheless, only one vaccine candidate has received FDA approval to initiate a phase I clinical trial12. Brazilian governmental bodies, such as the National Research Ethics Council, the National Clinical Trials Registry and the National Health Surveillance Agency, developed task-forces to timely evaluate research projects, clinical trials, and products related to Zika virus and associated diseases.

It has also been a race against the clock to quickly translate the results of R&D initiatives into public policies. For this purpose, the Brazilian Ministry of Health set up the Zika and Related Diseases Specialists Network, fostering greater collaboration between researchers and decision makers13. The joint effort between the Ministries of Health; Science, Technology, Innovation and Communication; and Education also made possible the launching of an open call for strategic research projects to tackle this emergency.

International research collaborations were established with partners such as the Center for Diseases Control, the World Health Organization, the US National Institutes of Health and the British Council. Since WHO declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, new communication channels have also been built between Ministries of Health from different countries14. As the world becomes more interconnected and urbanized, it is likely that many other epidemics will follow. Therefore, it is paramount that lessons learned from Zika lead to fast and effective responses to future global threats.

Comments on this article Comments (2)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 04 Aug 2016
  • Author Response 11 Aug 2016
    Tazio Vanni, Brazilian Ministry of Health, Brazil
    11 Aug 2016
    Author Response
    It is worth noting that community health workers have played a major role not only in vector control measures, but also in identifying and providing health care to patients affected ... Continue reading
  • Reader Comment 10 Aug 2016
    Enrique Barros, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Brazil
    10 Aug 2016
    Reader Comment
    This is a good summary the latest research developments in the Zika struggle. I wonder why there is no reference to research on potential roles and cost effectiveness of the ... Continue reading
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Vanni T, Chalegre KD, Giaretta Sachetti C et al. Zika virus emergency in Brazil: scientific challenges and early developments [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2016, 5:1915 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9330.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 04 Aug 2016
Views
20
Cite
Reviewer Report 17 Aug 2016
Luciano A. Moreira, Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou, FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, Brazil 
Approved
VIEWS 20
General comment
 
Vanni et al. describe in this manuscript what has been, the Brazilian Government response, since the declaration of the National Public Health Emergency due to Zika. It is well written, concise and indicates the Brazilian ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Moreira LA. Reviewer Report For: Zika virus emergency in Brazil: scientific challenges and early developments [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2016, 5:1915 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.10046.r15506)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
33
Cite
Reviewer Report 08 Aug 2016
Luciano Pamplona de Góes Cavalcanti, Department of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 33
Below my considerations. I believe that the article can be indexed with minor adjustments.

I do not agree with the statement: "In the last decades, Brazil has faced different arbovirus epidemics. However, none of them had the ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
de Góes Cavalcanti LP. Reviewer Report For: Zika virus emergency in Brazil: scientific challenges and early developments [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2016, 5:1915 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.10046.r15505)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (2)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 04 Aug 2016
  • Author Response 11 Aug 2016
    Tazio Vanni, Brazilian Ministry of Health, Brazil
    11 Aug 2016
    Author Response
    It is worth noting that community health workers have played a major role not only in vector control measures, but also in identifying and providing health care to patients affected ... Continue reading
  • Reader Comment 10 Aug 2016
    Enrique Barros, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Brazil
    10 Aug 2016
    Reader Comment
    This is a good summary the latest research developments in the Zika struggle. I wonder why there is no reference to research on potential roles and cost effectiveness of the ... Continue reading
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.