ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Opinion Article
Revised

Crafting minds and communities with Minecraft

[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
PUBLISHED 09 Jan 2017
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Developmental Psychology and Cognition gateway.

Abstract

Minecraft is a first-person perspective video game in which players roam freely in a large three-dimensional environment. Players mine the landscape for minerals and use these minerals to create structures (e.g., houses) and mould the landscape. But can Minecraft be used to craft communities and minds? In this opinion piece, we highlight the enormous potential of Minecraft for fostering social connectedness, collaboration, and its potential as an educational tool. We highlight the recent use of Minecraft to aid socialization in individuals with Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and promote civic engagement via the United Nations Human Settlement Program. We further provide novel links between Minecraft and recent on work on the role of social cures and community empowerment in enhancing mental health, wellbeing, and resilience.

Keywords

Minecraft, Education, Gamification, Technology, Developmental Psychology

Revised Amendments from Version 1

We now draw on social psychology literature to make more of an argument for the use of Minecraft to help craft communities and some potential limitations.

See the authors' detailed response to the review by Mark Lorch

Minecraft is a first-person perspective sandbox game – a three-dimensional, procedurally generated, Lego-like environment made up of blocks of different compounds (Duncan, 2011; Mojang, 2016). Players mine these compounds and re-place them to create various structures or shape the landscape. Minecraft has been purchased over 100 million times and in every country in the world (incl. Antarctica; Mojang, 2016). We think Minecraft is more than a global phenomenon, and may represent a critical and historical transition; an eminently popular videogame that is highly social and collaborative (Bainbridge, 2007; Entertainment Software Association, 2016; Granic et al., 2014; Przybylski, 2014), casting doubt on the depiction of video gamers as disconnected children and adolescents (Zimbardo & Coulombe, 2016). While early videogame research focused predominantly on the negative impacts of gaming (Strasburger et al., 2010), researchers are now starting to focus on the positives (Lorch & Mills, 2016). We believe that Minecraft is at the forefront of this change (Granic et al., 2014; Nebel et al., 2016).

Unlike other games, when played in its traditional settings, Minecraft has no aim or specific goals, which allows players the freedom to immerse themselves in their own narrative, build, create, and explore. Players can build alone, or join/create servers to play cooperatively. Given the creative nature of Minecraft and the open world environment, it is unsurprising that some have used the platform to create immersive worlds, artworks, and performances (Bukvic et al., 2014; Duncan, 2011). Importantly, Minecraft lends itself to socialization. The nature of the game has led to the formation of communities and groups that share and support creative creation. Given the move towards social and online gaming, it is unsurprising that a recent review found that videogame play is associated with social outcomes (Greitemeyer & Mügge, 2014). But unlike other games, Minecraft may be used to actively promote socialization.

An example of this is Autcraft, a semi-private Minecraft server and online community formed around those with Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD; Ringland et al., 2016). Those with ASD often struggle with face-to-face social interactions, but they still express a desire to connect socially. Playing Minecraft can help these players meet their social goals and gain the positive effects of socialization (Ringland et al., 2016). Although the effectiveness of Autcraft on wellbeing has not been tested, ethnographic research has suggested that the platform has successfully promoted collaboration, socialization, and community. Ensuring that individuals maintain group memberships is critical in improving health and wellbeing (Holt-Lunstad et al., 2010; Jetten et al., 2012), and the Autcraft blueprint can be used to help other groups achieve this (Osmanovic & Pecchioni, 2016). It is important to note, however, that Minecraft is likely best suited to facilitating, rather than replacing, in-person group based activities. For example, for disabled individuals who maybe largely house bound, Minecraft may provide a way to interact with fellow group members frequently; helping to keep groups together that may only meet occasionally in person. It will also be important for future studies to investigate whether Minecraft can imbue groups with the sense of belonging and acceptance that are critical to their benefits (Scarf et al., 2016a; Scarf et al., 2016b).

The collaborative nature of Minecraft can also promote prosocial behavior outside the videogame context (Gentile et al., 2009; Greitemeyer & Mügge, 2014). For example, to harness the prosocial behavior Minecraft instils and to promote civic engagement, Minecraft partnered with the United Nations Human Settlement Program (UN-Habitat) to engage communities in planning urban public spaces (Block By Block, 2016). The program provided residents with Minecraft and computer access so they could cooperatively recreate their cities and show city planners how they want their cities to look. The ubiquity of Minecraft and ease of play makes it the perfect game to promote bottom-up approaches and engage and empower communities to reimagine their city spaces (Baba et al., 2016). The program has helped communities all over the world create parks, city squares, sidewalks, seawalls, and marketplaces and offers a novel way to engage youth in shaping their environments.

Beyond social applications, Minecraft actively promotes the problem solving skills, creativity, planning, and persistence skills necessary for future success. Employers are actively recruiting gamers from online videogame leaderboards (Carr-Chellman, 2016) and gamers’ unique skills are credited with helping scientists solve complex problems (Cooper et al., 2010). Minecraft fosters these skills as the environment requires the player to interact with unfamiliar environments, experiment, calculate, plan ahead, and develop complex mental representations to understand the world. In fact, longitudinal research suggests that videogames are related to greater problem solving skills. For example, in a high school population, strategic videogame play predicted self-reported problem solving skills, which in turn predicted better academic grades (Adachi & Willoughby, 2013). Research has also experimentally manipulated videogame play to determine whether this correlation is causal. When undergraduates were assigned to play a strategy based game (Portal 2), relative to a group that ironically played a brain-training game (Lumosity), the strategy group displayed a significantly greater improvement in problem solving and persistence (Shute et al., 2015).

To help educators craft minds in the class room, Minecraft released an updated version, Minecraft: Education Edition in November 2016 (Mojang, 2016). To launch off the platform laid by MinecraftEDU, the updated version includes features to facilitate classroom participation. The use of a commercial game like Minecraft in education may not only increase motivation for learning, but allow students to take a more active role in their education. Already, a number of educators have taken advantage of the collaborative nature of Minecraft to plan immersive lessons, and homework in subjects such as math, earth and ocean science, chemistry, molecular biology, and history (for a review see Nebel et al., 2016). Outside the classroom, platforms already exist to help students explore geology or the stories behind famous art (British Geological Society, 2017; Tate Modern, 2017). Although there are few studies on using Minecraft in the classroom, educators have consistently reported that Minecraft has improved interest and motivation for learning (Nebel et al., 2016). For example, to measure the effectiveness of Minecraft as a teaching tool, one 7th grade class was taught with Minecraft and another with traditional lecture based learning. Both groups showed improvement, however, post-tests indicated those who had been taught with Minecraft performed significantly better (Wang & Towey, 2013). Unfortunately, this is one of the few studies to use an adequate control group to test the effectiveness of Minecraft in the classroom. Despite this, we believe that the functions added to Minecraft Education Edition will allow Minecraft to become a mainstay in education and help craft minds.

While more empirical data is needed, the use of Minecraft to foster socialization, engage and empower communities, and enhance students’ interest in education and creation suggests that Minecraft is crafting minds and opening a new chapter in video game research.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 19 Sep 2016
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Riordan BC and Scarf D. Crafting minds and communities with Minecraft [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 5:2339 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9625.2)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 2
VERSION 2
PUBLISHED 09 Jan 2017
Revised
Views
41
Cite
Reviewer Report 30 Mar 2017
Ascensión Hernández-Encinas, Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain 
Approved
VIEWS 41
This paper presents the use of Minecraft by individuals with ASD, with others. From our point of view there are some missing aspects that could improve the paper. This is only an introduction about the use of the program in ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Hernández-Encinas A. Reviewer Report For: Crafting minds and communities with Minecraft [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 5:2339 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.11434.r21361)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
49
Cite
Reviewer Report 01 Feb 2017
Mark Lorch, Department of Chemistry, University of Hull, Hull, UK 
Approved
VIEWS 49
I would like to thank the authors for addressing my earlier comments and adjusting their manuscript accordingly. The latest version presents a clear overview of some of the ways that Minecraft has been used in educational and provides context though ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Lorch M. Reviewer Report For: Crafting minds and communities with Minecraft [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 5:2339 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.11434.r19056)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 19 Sep 2016
Views
109
Cite
Reviewer Report 24 Oct 2016
Mark Lorch, Department of Chemistry, University of Hull, Hull, UK 
Not Approved
VIEWS 109
The article is a very brief introduction to some uses of Minecraft outside of its core gamer  base. The authors highlight some interesting projects, but do not dicuss them at any length. 

Beyond providing a handful of ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Lorch M. Reviewer Report For: Crafting minds and communities with Minecraft [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 5:2339 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.10369.r17059)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 09 Jan 2017
    Damian Scarf
    09 Jan 2017
    Author Response
    We thank the reviewer for their thoughts and suggestions and address some of their comments below. We hope that our amendments to the manuscript meet their concerns.
    1. The
    ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 09 Jan 2017
    Damian Scarf
    09 Jan 2017
    Author Response
    We thank the reviewer for their thoughts and suggestions and address some of their comments below. We hope that our amendments to the manuscript meet their concerns.
    1. The
    ... Continue reading

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 19 Sep 2016
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.