Keywords
Lung cancer, Melanoma, Syngeneic tumor model, LLC, B16-F0
Lung cancer, Melanoma, Syngeneic tumor model, LLC, B16-F0
This research note has been updated to address specific questions and suggestions by the reviewers that directly relate to this study. We have not significantly expanded the discussion on what is known about Lunasin and how syngeneic mouse models are used in drug development as it is beyond the scope of this highly focused research note. We have updated Figure 1.
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Masaki Terabe
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Jean-Pierre Gillet
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Elizabeth S. Yeh
Lunasin is a multifunctional bioactive peptide present as a component of the storage protein fraction in soybean seeds and in soy-derived food products1–4. Studies from several laboratories have documented that Lunasin has both chemopreventive activity that inhibits cellular transformation by carcinogens or oncogenes5–7 and chemotherapeutic activity against multiple human cancer types8–15. Taken together, these observations suggest that Lunasin may be one of the factors responsible for the lower cancer rates observed in people who consume high-soy diets1–3. One intriguing aspect of Lunasin is that this 44 amino acid peptide has at least three potential functional domains; a polyaspartic-acid C-terminal tail that binds Lunasin to the core histones H3 and H47,16–18, a tripeptide Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) domain that can serve as a recognition signal for specific integrins9,16,19, and a putative helical chromatin binding domain3,11. An important component of Lunasin uptake appears to be mediate by internalization via the integrin recycling pathway, with the integrin αVβ3 being a key factor15,16,19.
Our previous studies found that native Lunasin purified from soybean has therapeutic activity against established human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma cell lines both in vitro and in vivo8,15. In the case of NSCLC, in vitro studies suggested that a primary mechanism of action was the inhibition of proliferation caused by inhibition of integrin signaling and decreased retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation15,16,20. In the case of melanoma, Lunasin caused a significant decrease in putative cancer stem cells by causing these cells to switch phenotypes to a cell type expressing higher levels of the transcription factor MITF and one of its downstream targets, tyrosinase. In addition, decreased levels of the stemness protein Nanog were also observed8. Our recent unpublished studies suggest that Lunasin effects on melanoma cells are also mediated, at least in part, by effects on integrin signaling21. These results, along with a recent report on the effects of Lunasin on colon cancer stem-like cells10, suggest the exciting possibility that Lunasin can be used to target cancer stem cells. In addition, the currently available data suggest that Lunasin does possess attributes important for clinical utility including no obvious toxicity8 and being bioavailable22,23.
One of the more recent unexpected and exciting findings regarding Lunasin’s anticancer effects is that Lunasin appears to also have immunomodulatory activity11,24,25. Interestingly, these effects correlate with epigenetic effects and do not require the RGD domain or the polyaspartic-acid tail, thus implicating the putative chromatin-binding domain as being important11. Given that Lunasin has both direct therapeutic effects on cancer cells as well as the ability to affect immunity, we were prompted to determine if syngeneic mouse cancer models could be identified where both of these activities could be studied in concert so that the relative contribution of these two different effects on the potent in vivo activity of Lunasin could be determined. In these studies, we demonstrate that Lunasin has significant in vitro and in vivo activity in syngeneic mouse models for lung cancer and melanoma. These syngeneic models will provide the ability to pursue studies of Lunasin action in an immunocompetent host and use genetic approaches to understand how specific genetic manipulations affect Lunasin’s ability to inhibit tumor growth and metastasis.
Lunasin was purified from soybean white flake (Owensboro Grain Company) as previously described26 by Kentucky BioProcessing (Owensboro, KY). Analysis by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis indicated that this Lunasin preparation had >99% purity8. The purified Lunasin was diluted to a concentration of 9.3 mg/ml in sterile 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 and stored at 4°C.
LLC (mouse lung carcinoma) and B16-F0 (mouse melanoma) cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATTC). LLC and B16-F0 cells were cultured in DMEM medium (Invitrogen). Medium was supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen), 100 IU/mL of penicillin, and 100 μg/mL of streptomycin (Invitrogen) and cells grown at 37°C in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2.
In vitro cell growth inhibition was measured via a tetrazolium-based [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium salt (MTS) assay (Promega). Briefly, 2 × 103 cells were plated into 96-well plates and incubated overnight. The cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of Lunasin for 72 hours in 100 µL fresh medium. Every 24 hours, cell culture media was replaced with fresh culture media amended with the indicated concentrations of Lunasin. After 72 hours, 20 µL of CellTiter 96® AQueous One reagent (Promega) was added and incubated with the cells for 1 hour. Absorbance was measured at 490 nm using a Synergy HT plate reader (Biotek). Cell growth was estimated from the absorbance readings and has been normalized to vehicle-treated control cells. Averages of three replicates per treatment were used for analysis.
These assays were done as previously described8 except that a 24-well per plate format was used. LLC and B16-F0 cells were plated at a density of 500 and 1,000 cells/well, respectively.
Six-week-old male mice (C57 BL/6) were purchased from Harlan Laboratories (Indianapolis, IN). All procedures involving mice were carried out in accordance with the international guidelines of the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animals Care with the approval of the University of Louisville Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol # 12091). Mice were maintained in the University of Louisville Health Center animal use facility and maintained by Research Resources Facilities staff using standard approved protocols. Mice were housed in polycarbonate shoebox cages (maximum 5 mice/cage) on a ventilated rack system in a temperature controlled room operating on a timed 12 hour light/dark cycle. Mice were randomly placed into groups (6–10 mice per group) and received subcutaneous injections of LLC (1 × 105) or B16-F0 (1 × 106) cells suspended in 100 μL of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) in the hind flank. Tumors were measured starting 10 days post-injection up to 22 days post-injection. Tumor size was measured twice weekly using digital calipers (Mitutoyo) with an accuracy of ± 0.02 mm. Tumor volume was calculated as where w = width and l = length. All mice except in control group were treated with Lunasin daily starting from the day of injection. Lunasin was administered by intraperitoneal (IP) injections in 50 mM phosphate buffer at a dose of either 10 or 30 mg Lunasin/kg body weight. In some experiments, cells were pretreated with 100 μM Lunasin for 72 hours prior to injection of cells into mice. At the end of the experiments, mice were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation followed by cervical dislocation.
We tested the ability of Lunasin to inhibit LLC and B16-F0 growth in both adherent and non-adherent assays. In adherent assays, Lunasin had modest dose-dependent effects on the growth of both LLC and B16-F0 cells; <10% at 30 and 100 μM Lunasin (Figure 1A–B, Table 1). In contrast, Lunasin had substantial inhibitory activity in non-adherent colony forming assays. Both LLC and B16-F0 exhibited a dose-dependent reduction in colony formation from ~20% to 40% over a Lunasin concentration range of 10 to 100 μM (Figure 1C–D, Table 2). The difference in activity observed in adherent versus non-adherent assays recapitulates our previous results using human NSCLC and melanoma cells and likely reflects differences in integrin expression profiles under these distinct culture conditions8,15. The sensitivity of the mouse cell lines were comparable to that observed for human NSCLC and melanoma cells. Growth inhibition under adherent culture conditions was <15% for most NSCLC cell lines and <10% for melanoma cell lines treated with 100 μM Lunasin, whereas inhibition of colony formation by human NSCLC and melanoma cell lines treated with 100 μM Lunasin ranged from ~65% to 85%, and ~20 to 40%, respectively. These results demonstrate that the Lunasin sensitivity of human and mouse lung cancer and melanoma cells are quite similar in vitro.
Cells were cultured under adherent (A,B) or non-adherent (C,D) culture conditions and treated with the indicated concentrations of Lunasin. For adherent-culture assays, proliferation was assessed after 72 hours of treatment using a MTS assay. For non-adherent-culture assays, colonies were allowed to form over 10–18 days until colonies grew to approximately 100 μm in diameter. The number of colonies formed was counted after staining with crystal violet. Data from both assays have been normalized to the vehicle treated control and represent the mean ± S.D. An asterisk (*) indicates that a treatment was significantly different (p < 0.05) from the control as determined by an unpaired student’s t-test.
We initially tested the ability of Lunasin to inhibit tumor growth initiated by LLC cells at doses of 10 and 30 mg/kg. These doses are comparable to those for several biologic drugs and the cyclic peptide, cilengitide27,28. Lunasin inhibited tumor growth in mice treated at the 30 mg/kg dose by 55% at day 22 whereas the 10 mg/kg dose had only modest effects that were only statistically significant on days 18 and 20 (Figure 2A, Table 3). We next tested whether pre-treating LLC cells with 100 μM for 72 h in vitro prior to implantation further affected tumor growth. This was prompted by our earlier studies demonstrating that Lunasin reduces the putative cancer initiating cell pool in human melanoma cell lines8. The results clearly show that pre-treatment did not enhance inhibition of tumor growth by Lunasin at a dose of 30 mg/kg (Figure 2B, Table 4). In this experiment, tumor growth at day 22 was 43% of the control. The inhibition of LLC tumor growth by Lunasin was somewhat less than that observed in xenograft studies of NSCLC H1299 where tumor growth was reduced by 63% at 32 days in mice treated with 30 mg/kg Lunasin15.
(A) Effects of 10 mg/kg and 30 mg/kg Lunasin treatment on LLC tumor growth. (B) Effects of 30 mg/kg Lunasin on the growth of tumors initiated by LLC cells either not pre-treated (Lunasin-, red) or pre-treated with 100 μM Lunasin (Lunasin+, blue) for 72 hours prior to injection of cells into mice. (C) Effects of 30 mg/kg Lunasin on the growth of tumors initiated by B16-F0 cells either not pre-treated (Lunasin-, red) or pre-treated with 100 μM Lunasin (Lunasin+, blue) for 72 hours prior to injection of cells into mice. LLC (1 × 105) or B16-F0 (1 × 106) cells were injected subcutaneously in the hind flanks of mice to initiate tumors. Lunasin treatments were initiated on the same day that cells were injected and continued daily until the end of the experiment. Tumor volumes were determined from caliper measurements. Treatment groups contained 6–10 mice per group. The data shown represent the mean ± SEM and an asterisk (*) indicates that an individual treatment was significantly different (p < 0.05) from the control as determined by an unpaired student’s t-test.
Lunasin at a dose of 30 mg/kg was also found to inhibit tumor growth initiated by B16-F0 melanoma cells, with a reduction in tumor growth of 60% at day 22 (Figure 2C, Table 5). As was the case with LLC, pre-treatment with 100 μM Lunasin for 72 h in vitro did not enhance inhibition of tumor growth. These results are quite comparable to our xenograft studies using the human melanoma cell line A375 where we observed a 55% reduction in tumor volume 34 days after implantation8.
These studies establish that syngeneic mouse models for lung cancer and melanoma are sensitive to Lunasin and that their sensitivity is comparable to that observed in xenograft studies of human NSCLC and melanoma. Thus, these models may be useful to further elucidate the mechanisms of Lunasin action, particularly potential immune effects, and provide important new information on the feasibility of using Lunasin to treat these two deadly cancers.
F1000Research: Dataset 1. Raw data of validation of syngeneic mouse models of melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer for investigating the anticancer effects of the soy-derived peptide lunasin, 10.5256/f1000research.9661.d13696529
BD performed the MTS assays and in vivo studies, and edited the manuscript; CS performed the colony-forming assays and edited the manuscript; KY assisted in directing the study and editing the manuscript; KRD directed the study and wrote the manuscript. All authors agreed to the final content of this article.
KRD is listed as an inventor on two issued patents relating to the expression and purification of Lunasin peptides and may benefit financially if the technologies described in these patents are licensed or sold. BD, CS, and KY declare no conflict of interests.
This work was funded by Owensboro Grain Company, Owensboro, Kentucky, USA.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |
Version 2 (revision) 22 Feb 17 |
read | ||
Version 1 04 Oct 16 |
read | read | read |
Click here to access the data.
Spreadsheet data files may not format correctly if your computer is using different default delimiters (symbols used to separate values into separate cells) - a spreadsheet created in one region is sometimes misinterpreted by computers in other regions. You can change the regional settings on your computer so that the spreadsheet can be interpreted correctly.
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)