Ehlers SM and Ellrich JA. First visual record of rare purple dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) on the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia, Canada [version 1; peer review: 3 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2016, 5:2435 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9707.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
1St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Canada
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS
Abstract
The dogwhelk Nucella lapillus is a rocky intertidal gastropod of the North Atlantic coast. Individual shell color varies. Common colors range between white and brown, with darker dogwhelks being more affected by heat stress than lighter-colored conspecifics. Other reported shell colors are black, mauve, pink, yellow, and orange from European coasts, red and grey from the Bay of Fundy coast of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia (Canada), and purple, black, gray, yellow, and orange from the coasts of Maine and Massachusetts (USA), with purple being considered as a rare color. On the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia, dogwhelks are active from April until November, but information on dogwhelk shell color is missing for this coast. On 16 June 2016, we found two purple dogwhelks in the mid-to-high intertidal zone of a moderately wave-exposed rocky shore near Duncans Cove, on the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia while collecting dogwhelks (n= 1000) for manipulative field experiments. All other dogwhelks collected on that day were of common white and brown colors. During earlier dogwhelk collections in Atlantic Nova Scotia (between 2011-2013) and field surveys in Duncans Cove (between 2014-2016), we did not find any purple dogwhelks, indicating the rareness of this color in that region. Interestingly, the purple dogwhelks were detected on a relatively cool day (12.3 ± 0.4 °C, mean ± se, n= 96 temperature measurements) compared to the intertidal temperatures of all other survey days (≥ 18.2 ± 0.5 °C), suggesting that purple dogwhelks may find it less thermally stressful to venture out of crevices and macroalgal cover under relatively cool temperatures. Our observations provide the first visual record of rare purple dogwhelks on the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia, Canada.
Keywords
dogwhelk, Nucella lapillus, color, snail, rocky intertidal, rareness, temperature
Corresponding author:
Julius A. Ellrich
Competing interests:
No competing interests were disclosed.
Grant information:
The field surveys were funded by a Discovery Grant (#311624) awarded to Ricardo A. Scrosati by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
The dogwhelk Nucella lapillus (L. 1758) is a common predatory gastropod in the rocky intertidal of the North Atlantic (Crothers, 1985; Etter, 2007). Individuals vary in shell color. White and brown are common colors (Berry & Crothers, 1974; Crothers, 1983; Crothers, 1985; Etter, 1988), with darker dogwhelks being more affected by physiological stress under high temperatures than lighter-color conspecifics caused by higher energy intake from sunlight (Etter, 1988). Other shell colors reported are black, mauve, pink, yellow, and orange on European coasts (Berry & Crothers, 1974; Moore, 1936), red and grey from the Bay of Fundy coast of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia (Canada) (Colton, 1922, Crothers, 1983), and black, purple, gray, yellow, and orange from the coasts of Maine (Colton, 1922; Crothers, 1983) and Massachusetts (USA) (Etter, 1988). Purple is considered to be a rare color in dogwhelks (Colton, 1922; Etter, 1988). On the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia, dogwhelks are active from April until November (Hughes, 1972; Hunt & Scheibling, 1998), but information on dogwhelk shell colors is missing for this coast.
Methods
On 16 June 2016, we collected 1000 dogwhelks along 300 m of coastline in the mid-to-high intertidal of a moderately wave-exposed rocky shore near Duncans Cove (44°29’41.22”N, 63° 31’26.66”W), Halifax on the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia. The dogwhelks were collected for manipulative field experiments to examine nonconsumptive effects (NCEs) of these predators on their prey. Equal dogwhelk quantities were collected by one of us (JAE) for related research projects on dogwhelk NCEs (e.g. Ellrich et al., 2015; Ellrich et al., 2016) in several locations, with similar levels of intertidal elevation and wave-exposure, along the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia: in Glasgow Head (45°19’12.61”N, 60° 17’34.15”W) in May and June 2011, in Deming Island (45°12’44.31”N, 61° 10’25.99”W) in May 2012, and in Deming Island, Halfway Cove (45°20’58.98”N, 61° 21’46.58”W), and Half Island Cove (45°21’19.77”N, 61° 11’23.73”W) in May and June 2013.
During field surveys for another research project near our dogwhelk collection site in Duncans Cove, dogwhelk colors were observed regularly (on 12 August 2014, 1 September 2015, and 21 August 2016). To observe dogwhelk colors, 30 quadrats (25 cm × 25 cm) along a ~150 m transect parallel to the coastline were sampled at random on each survey date. Throughout the entire survey period, intertidal temperature was measured continuously every 30 minutes by two submersible loggers (HOBO Pendant Logger, Onset Computer Corp., Pocasset, MA, USA). Using temperature data from those loggers, we calculated the average intertidal temperature for the all the dates when dogwhelks were collected or observed in Duncans Cove.
Results & discussion
Date
Time
Datalogger
Temperature (Degree C)
12-Aug-14
12:00 AM
1
15.282
12-Aug-14
12:30 AM
1
14.996
12-Aug-14
1:00 AM
1
14.996
12-Aug-14
1:30 AM
1
14.804
12-Aug-14
2:00 AM
1
14.613
12-Aug-14
2:30 AM
1
14.421
12-Aug-14
3:00 AM
1
14.421
12-Aug-14
3:30 AM
1
14.23
12-Aug-14
4:00 AM
1
14.23
12-Aug-14
4:30 AM
1
14.038
12-Aug-14
5:00 AM
1
13.846
12-Aug-14
5:30 AM
1
13.75
12-Aug-14
6:00 AM
1
13.654
12-Aug-14
6:30 AM
1
13.654
12-Aug-14
7:00 AM
1
13.846
12-Aug-14
7:30 AM
1
14.709
12-Aug-14
8:00 AM
1
15.378
12-Aug-14
8:30 AM
1
15.473
12-Aug-14
9:00 AM
1
15.569
12-Aug-14
9:30 AM
1
15.569
12-Aug-14
10:00 AM
1
15.569
12-Aug-14
10:30 AM
1
15.664
12-Aug-14
11:00 AM
1
15.855
12-Aug-14
11:30 AM
1
16.141
12-Aug-14
12:00 PM
1
16.618
12-Aug-14
12:30 PM
1
18.045
12-Aug-14
1:00 PM
1
23.1
12-Aug-14
1:30 PM
1
25.513
12-Aug-14
2:00 PM
1
28.357
12-Aug-14
2:30 PM
1
29.853
12-Aug-14
3:00 PM
1
32.086
12-Aug-14
3:30 PM
1
32.291
12-Aug-14
4:00 PM
1
33.118
12-Aug-14
4:30 PM
1
34.585
12-Aug-14
5:00 PM
1
32.6
12-Aug-14
5:30 PM
1
33.743
12-Aug-14
6:00 PM
1
32.394
12-Aug-14
6:30 PM
1
31.574
12-Aug-14
7:00 PM
1
21.378
12-Aug-14
7:30 PM
1
19.758
12-Aug-14
8:00 PM
1
16.903
12-Aug-14
8:30 PM
1
16.332
12-Aug-14
9:00 PM
1
16.332
12-Aug-14
9:30 PM
1
16.618
12-Aug-14
10:00 PM
1
16.427
12-Aug-14
10:30 PM
1
16.523
12-Aug-14
11:00 PM
1
16.332
12-Aug-14
11:30 PM
1
16.332
12-Aug-14
12:00 AM
2
14.9
12-Aug-14
12:30 AM
2
14.421
12-Aug-14
1:00 AM
2
14.613
12-Aug-14
1:30 AM
2
14.613
12-Aug-14
2:00 AM
2
14.23
12-Aug-14
2:30 AM
2
14.134
12-Aug-14
3:00 AM
2
14.134
12-Aug-14
3:30 AM
2
13.846
12-Aug-14
4:00 AM
2
13.846
12-Aug-14
4:30 AM
2
13.654
12-Aug-14
5:00 AM
2
13.461
12-Aug-14
5:30 AM
2
13.269
12-Aug-14
6:00 AM
2
13.173
12-Aug-14
6:30 AM
2
13.269
12-Aug-14
7:00 AM
2
14.325
12-Aug-14
7:30 AM
2
15.951
12-Aug-14
8:00 AM
2
17.855
12-Aug-14
8:30 AM
2
17.665
12-Aug-14
9:00 AM
2
17.189
12-Aug-14
9:30 AM
2
17.094
12-Aug-14
10:00 AM
2
17.379
12-Aug-14
10:30 AM
2
17.665
12-Aug-14
11:00 AM
2
18.426
12-Aug-14
11:30 AM
2
19.187
12-Aug-14
12:00 PM
2
20.519
12-Aug-14
12:30 PM
2
22.621
12-Aug-14
1:00 PM
2
28.06
12-Aug-14
1:30 PM
2
25.222
12-Aug-14
2:00 PM
2
31.268
12-Aug-14
2:30 PM
2
32.188
12-Aug-14
3:00 PM
2
32.911
12-Aug-14
3:30 PM
2
32.704
12-Aug-14
4:00 PM
2
32.704
12-Aug-14
4:30 PM
2
32.188
12-Aug-14
5:00 PM
2
30.255
12-Aug-14
5:30 PM
2
28.555
12-Aug-14
6:00 PM
2
26.683
12-Aug-14
6:30 PM
2
25.222
12-Aug-14
7:00 PM
2
24.835
12-Aug-14
7:30 PM
2
18.521
12-Aug-14
8:00 PM
2
16.808
12-Aug-14
8:30 PM
2
16.332
12-Aug-14
9:00 PM
2
16.427
12-Aug-14
9:30 PM
2
16.713
12-Aug-14
10:00 PM
2
16.618
12-Aug-14
10:30 PM
2
16.332
12-Aug-14
11:00 PM
2
16.523
Dataset 1.Intertidal temperatures 12-Aug-2014.
Intertidal temperatures measured by temperature loggers 1 & 2 on 12-Aug-2014 every 30 minutes.
Date
Time
Datalogger
Temperature (Degree C)
01-Sep-15
12:00 AM
1
15.378
01-Sep-15
12:30 AM
1
15.282
01-Sep-15
1:00 AM
1
15.569
01-Sep-15
1:30 AM
1
15.76
01-Sep-15
2:00 AM
1
15.76
01-Sep-15
2:30 AM
1
15.378
01-Sep-15
3:00 AM
1
15.187
01-Sep-15
3:30 AM
1
15.091
01-Sep-15
4:00 AM
1
14.9
01-Sep-15
4:30 AM
1
14.709
01-Sep-15
5:00 AM
1
14.613
01-Sep-15
5:30 AM
1
15.187
01-Sep-15
6:00 AM
1
15.76
01-Sep-15
6:30 AM
1
15.187
01-Sep-15
7:00 AM
1
15.282
01-Sep-15
7:30 AM
1
15.378
01-Sep-15
8:00 AM
1
15.569
01-Sep-15
8:30 AM
1
14.996
01-Sep-15
9:00 AM
1
14.9
01-Sep-15
9:30 AM
1
15.091
01-Sep-15
10:00 AM
1
15.187
01-Sep-15
10:30 AM
1
15.378
01-Sep-15
11:00 AM
1
16.237
01-Sep-15
11:30 AM
1
16.523
01-Sep-15
12:00 PM
1
16.618
01-Sep-15
12:30 PM
1
17.284
01-Sep-15
1:00 PM
1
20.805
01-Sep-15
1:30 PM
1
20.519
01-Sep-15
2:00 PM
1
27.567
01-Sep-15
2:30 PM
1
31.064
01-Sep-15
3:00 PM
1
33.222
01-Sep-15
3:30 PM
1
34.796
01-Sep-15
4:00 PM
1
29.252
01-Sep-15
4:30 PM
1
33.326
01-Sep-15
5:00 PM
1
32.6
01-Sep-15
5:30 PM
1
30.558
01-Sep-15
6:00 PM
1
31.983
01-Sep-15
6:30 PM
1
22.812
01-Sep-15
7:00 PM
1
20.043
01-Sep-15
7:30 PM
1
18.426
01-Sep-15
8:00 PM
1
16.903
01-Sep-15
8:30 PM
1
16.237
01-Sep-15
9:00 PM
1
17.094
01-Sep-15
9:30 PM
1
18.236
01-Sep-15
10:00 PM
1
18.331
01-Sep-15
10:30 PM
1
18.331
01-Sep-15
11:00 PM
1
18.331
01-Sep-15
11:30 PM
1
18.331
01-Sep-15
12:00 AM
2
15.282
01-Sep-15
12:30 AM
2
15.378
01-Sep-15
1:00 AM
2
15.282
01-Sep-15
1:30 AM
2
14.996
01-Sep-15
2:00 AM
2
14.804
01-Sep-15
2:30 AM
2
14.709
01-Sep-15
3:00 AM
2
14.996
01-Sep-15
3:30 AM
2
14.9
01-Sep-15
4:00 AM
2
14.613
01-Sep-15
4:30 AM
2
14.517
01-Sep-15
5:00 AM
2
14.421
01-Sep-15
5:30 AM
2
15.187
01-Sep-15
6:00 AM
2
15.664
01-Sep-15
6:30 AM
2
15.378
01-Sep-15
7:00 AM
2
17.665
01-Sep-15
7:30 AM
2
17.475
01-Sep-15
8:00 AM
2
16.999
01-Sep-15
8:30 AM
2
15.664
01-Sep-15
9:00 AM
2
16.427
01-Sep-15
9:30 AM
2
15.664
01-Sep-15
10:00 AM
2
16.523
01-Sep-15
10:30 AM
2
16.237
01-Sep-15
11:00 AM
2
16.808
01-Sep-15
11:30 AM
2
17.189
01-Sep-15
12:00 PM
2
17.284
01-Sep-15
12:30 PM
2
17.76
01-Sep-15
1:00 PM
2
17.855
01-Sep-15
1:30 PM
2
18.045
01-Sep-15
2:00 PM
2
18.331
01-Sep-15
2:30 PM
2
20.424
01-Sep-15
3:00 PM
2
20.424
01-Sep-15
3:30 PM
2
21.091
01-Sep-15
4:00 PM
2
20.996
01-Sep-15
4:30 PM
2
20.519
01-Sep-15
5:00 PM
2
20.138
01-Sep-15
5:30 PM
2
18.901
01-Sep-15
6:00 PM
2
18.426
01-Sep-15
6:30 PM
2
17.855
01-Sep-15
7:00 PM
2
17.094
01-Sep-15
7:30 PM
2
15.951
01-Sep-15
8:00 PM
2
14.9
01-Sep-15
8:30 PM
2
15.282
01-Sep-15
9:00 PM
2
17.76
01-Sep-15
9:30 PM
2
18.236
01-Sep-15
10:00 PM
2
18.426
01-Sep-15
10:30 PM
2
18.426
01-Sep-15
11:00 PM
2
18.331
Dataset 2.Intertidal temperatures 01-Sep-2015.
Intertidal temperatures measured by temperature loggers 1 & 2 on 01-Sep-2015 every 30 minutes.
Date
Time
Datalogger
Temperature (Degree C)
12-Jun-16
12:00 AM
1
9.275
12-Jun-16
12:30 AM
1
9.472
12-Jun-16
1:00 AM
1
9.472
12-Jun-16
1:30 AM
1
9.571
12-Jun-16
2:00 AM
1
9.571
12-Jun-16
2:30 AM
1
9.571
12-Jun-16
3:00 AM
1
9.373
12-Jun-16
3:30 AM
1
9.176
12-Jun-16
4:00 AM
1
9.768
12-Jun-16
4:30 AM
1
9.965
12-Jun-16
5:00 AM
1
10.063
12-Jun-16
5:30 AM
1
10.063
12-Jun-16
6:00 AM
1
10.161
12-Jun-16
6:30 AM
1
10.161
12-Jun-16
7:00 AM
1
10.259
12-Jun-16
7:30 AM
1
10.357
12-Jun-16
8:00 AM
1
10.553
12-Jun-16
8:30 AM
1
11.334
12-Jun-16
9:00 AM
1
11.819
12-Jun-16
9:30 AM
1
13.654
12-Jun-16
10:00 AM
1
14.421
12-Jun-16
10:30 AM
1
14.996
12-Jun-16
11:00 AM
1
15.76
12-Jun-16
11:30 AM
1
16.808
12-Jun-16
12:00 PM
1
15.091
12-Jun-16
12:30 PM
1
17.57
12-Jun-16
1:00 PM
1
16.713
12-Jun-16
1:30 PM
1
20.424
12-Jun-16
2:00 PM
1
17.855
12-Jun-16
2:30 PM
1
17.665
12-Jun-16
3:00 PM
1
17.189
12-Jun-16
3:30 PM
1
19.472
12-Jun-16
4:00 PM
1
16.427
12-Jun-16
4:30 PM
1
11.625
12-Jun-16
5:00 PM
1
10.553
12-Jun-16
5:30 PM
1
10.259
12-Jun-16
6:00 PM
1
10.259
12-Jun-16
6:30 PM
1
10.846
12-Jun-16
7:00 PM
1
10.357
12-Jun-16
7:30 PM
1
10.357
12-Jun-16
8:00 PM
1
10.357
12-Jun-16
8:30 PM
1
10.259
12-Jun-16
9:00 PM
1
9.965
12-Jun-16
9:30 PM
1
9.571
12-Jun-16
10:00 PM
1
9.373
12-Jun-16
10:30 PM
1
9.472
12-Jun-16
11:00 PM
1
8.978
12-Jun-16
11:30 PM
1
7.582
12-Jun-16
12:00 AM
2
9.176
12-Jun-16
12:30 AM
2
9.275
12-Jun-16
1:00 AM
2
9.275
12-Jun-16
1:30 AM
2
9.373
12-Jun-16
2:00 AM
2
9.472
12-Jun-16
2:30 AM
2
9.373
12-Jun-16
3:00 AM
2
9.275
12-Jun-16
3:30 AM
2
8.879
12-Jun-16
4:00 AM
2
9.472
12-Jun-16
4:30 AM
2
9.965
12-Jun-16
5:00 AM
2
10.063
12-Jun-16
5:30 AM
2
10.063
12-Jun-16
6:00 AM
2
10.161
12-Jun-16
6:30 AM
2
10.259
12-Jun-16
7:00 AM
2
10.259
12-Jun-16
7:30 AM
2
10.455
12-Jun-16
8:00 AM
2
10.846
12-Jun-16
8:30 AM
2
14.613
12-Jun-16
9:00 AM
2
22.908
12-Jun-16
9:30 AM
2
20.138
12-Jun-16
10:00 AM
2
21.473
12-Jun-16
10:30 AM
2
18.616
12-Jun-16
11:00 AM
2
20.71
12-Jun-16
11:30 AM
2
19.758
12-Jun-16
12:00 PM
2
16.237
12-Jun-16
12:30 PM
2
18.14
12-Jun-16
1:00 PM
2
16.999
12-Jun-16
1:30 PM
2
20.901
12-Jun-16
2:00 PM
2
17.57
12-Jun-16
2:30 PM
2
17.57
12-Jun-16
3:00 PM
2
17.475
12-Jun-16
3:30 PM
2
18.236
12-Jun-16
4:00 PM
2
12.98
12-Jun-16
4:30 PM
2
11.528
12-Jun-16
5:00 PM
2
10.944
12-Jun-16
5:30 PM
2
10.651
12-Jun-16
6:00 PM
2
10.455
12-Jun-16
6:30 PM
2
10.553
12-Jun-16
7:00 PM
2
10.553
12-Jun-16
7:30 PM
2
10.357
12-Jun-16
8:00 PM
2
10.259
12-Jun-16
8:30 PM
2
10.161
12-Jun-16
9:00 PM
2
9.571
12-Jun-16
9:30 PM
2
9.373
12-Jun-16
10:00 PM
2
9.373
12-Jun-16
10:30 PM
2
9.275
12-Jun-16
11:00 PM
2
8.68
Dataset 3.Intertidal temperatures 12-Jun-2016.
Intertidal temperatures measured by temperature loggers 1 & 2 on 12-Jun-2016 every 30 minutes.
Date
Time
Datalogger
Temperature (Degree C)
21-Aug-16
12:00 AM
1
19.187
21-Aug-16
12:30 AM
1
19.187
21-Aug-16
1:00 AM
1
18.996
21-Aug-16
1:30 AM
1
18.616
21-Aug-16
2:00 AM
1
18.521
21-Aug-16
2:30 AM
1
18.426
21-Aug-16
3:00 AM
1
18.331
21-Aug-16
3:30 AM
1
17.475
21-Aug-16
4:00 AM
1
17.189
21-Aug-16
4:30 AM
1
16.903
21-Aug-16
5:00 AM
1
16.808
21-Aug-16
5:30 AM
1
16.618
21-Aug-16
6:00 AM
1
16.427
21-Aug-16
6:30 AM
1
16.808
21-Aug-16
7:00 AM
1
17.475
21-Aug-16
7:30 AM
1
18.045
21-Aug-16
8:00 AM
1
19.092
21-Aug-16
8:30 AM
1
19.377
21-Aug-16
9:00 AM
1
19.092
21-Aug-16
9:30 AM
1
18.996
21-Aug-16
10:00 AM
1
19.092
21-Aug-16
10:30 AM
1
19.092
21-Aug-16
11:00 AM
1
19.187
21-Aug-16
11:30 AM
1
19.282
21-Aug-16
12:00 PM
1
19.377
21-Aug-16
12:30 PM
1
19.662
21-Aug-16
1:00 PM
1
20.329
21-Aug-16
1:30 PM
1
21.76
21-Aug-16
2:00 PM
1
22.812
21-Aug-16
2:30 PM
1
24.738
21-Aug-16
3:00 PM
1
29.452
21-Aug-16
3:30 PM
1
31.574
21-Aug-16
4:00 PM
1
32.086
21-Aug-16
4:30 PM
1
36.837
21-Aug-16
5:00 PM
1
33.014
21-Aug-16
5:30 PM
1
31.472
21-Aug-16
6:00 PM
1
32.086
21-Aug-16
6:30 PM
1
26.39
21-Aug-16
7:00 PM
1
26.585
21-Aug-16
7:30 PM
1
26
21-Aug-16
8:00 PM
1
26.195
21-Aug-16
8:30 PM
1
26.097
21-Aug-16
9:00 PM
1
26
21-Aug-16
9:30 PM
1
27.567
21-Aug-16
10:00 PM
1
26.097
21-Aug-16
10:30 PM
1
24.351
21-Aug-16
11:00 PM
1
23.869
21-Aug-16
11:30 PM
1
23.677
21-Aug-16
12:00 AM
2
19.187
21-Aug-16
12:30 AM
2
19.187
21-Aug-16
1:00 AM
2
18.996
21-Aug-16
1:30 AM
2
18.521
21-Aug-16
2:00 AM
2
18.426
21-Aug-16
2:30 AM
2
18.331
21-Aug-16
3:00 AM
2
18.14
21-Aug-16
3:30 AM
2
17.189
21-Aug-16
4:00 AM
2
16.713
21-Aug-16
4:30 AM
2
16.523
21-Aug-16
5:00 AM
2
16.237
21-Aug-16
5:30 AM
2
16.141
21-Aug-16
6:00 AM
2
16.237
21-Aug-16
6:30 AM
2
16.332
21-Aug-16
7:00 AM
2
18.711
21-Aug-16
7:30 AM
2
25.416
21-Aug-16
8:00 AM
2
21.76
21-Aug-16
8:30 AM
2
19.853
21-Aug-16
9:00 AM
2
19.472
21-Aug-16
9:30 AM
2
19.758
21-Aug-16
10:00 AM
2
19.758
21-Aug-16
10:30 AM
2
19.758
21-Aug-16
11:00 AM
2
20.043
21-Aug-16
11:30 AM
2
19.948
21-Aug-16
12:00 PM
2
20.329
21-Aug-16
12:30 PM
2
20.329
21-Aug-16
1:00 PM
2
20.329
21-Aug-16
1:30 PM
2
20.329
21-Aug-16
2:00 PM
2
21.76
21-Aug-16
2:30 PM
2
23.1
21-Aug-16
3:00 PM
2
23.966
21-Aug-16
3:30 PM
2
24.255
21-Aug-16
4:00 PM
2
25.222
21-Aug-16
4:30 PM
2
31.983
21-Aug-16
5:00 PM
2
31.064
21-Aug-16
5:30 PM
2
31.676
21-Aug-16
6:00 PM
2
31.88
21-Aug-16
6:30 PM
2
26
21-Aug-16
7:00 PM
2
26.195
21-Aug-16
7:30 PM
2
25.902
21-Aug-16
8:00 PM
2
26.195
21-Aug-16
8:30 PM
2
26.195
21-Aug-16
9:00 PM
2
26
21-Aug-16
9:30 PM
2
27.468
21-Aug-16
10:00 PM
2
26.195
21-Aug-16
10:30 PM
2
24.641
21-Aug-16
11:00 PM
2
24.158
Dataset 4.Intertidal temperatures 21-Aug-2016.
Intertidal temperatures measured by temperature loggers 1 & 2 on 21-Aug-2016 every 30 minutes.
In our collection of dogwhelks near Duncans Cove on 16 June 2016 (n= 1000 dogwhelks), we found two dogwhelks of purple shell color. Our results provide the first visual record of purple dogwhelks on the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia (Figure 1). The other dogwhelks collected on that day were of common white and brown shell colors. We did not find any other purple dogwhelk during any of our five collections of equal dogwhelk quantities along the Atlantic Coast of Nova Scotia (n= 5000 dogwhelks of brown and white shell color in total) or three field surveys near Duncans Cove (n= 82 dogwhelks of brown and white shell color in total) indicating that purple dogwhelks are rare in that region.
Figure 1. A purple dogwhelk, Nucella lapillus (L. 1758).
Picture taken near Duncans Cove (44°29’41.22”N, 63° 31’26.66”W), Halifax on the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia, Canada on 16 June 2016 (picture credit: Julius A. Ellrich).
Comparing the average intertidal temperatures of the dogwhelk collection day (12.3 ± 0.4°C, mean ± se, n = 96 temperature measurements, 16 June 2016) and the three dogwhelk observation days (19.5 ± 0.7°C, 12 August 2014; 18.2 ± 0.5°C, 1 September 2015; 22.3 ± 0.5°C, 21 August 2016) in Duncans Cove revealed that the purple dogwhelks were found on a relatively cool day. This suggests that purple dogwhelks may find it less thermally stressful to venture out of crevices and macroalgal cover under relatively cool temperatures. Darker dogwhelks show stronger physiological responses to heat, such as faster desiccation, than lighter-color conspecifics (Etter, 1988). Future experiments could, thus, examine if dogwhelk behavioural responses to temperature are related to shell color, which may contribute to the rareness in the observed purple dogwhelks.
SME and JAE conducted the field work. JAE wrote the manuscript and SME provided critical comments to produce the final version.
Competing interests
No competing interests were disclosed.
Grant information
The field surveys were funded by a Discovery Grant (#311624) awarded to Ricardo A. Scrosati by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).
The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Faculty Opinions recommended
References
Berry RJ, Crothers JH:
Visible variation in the dog-whelk, Nucella lapillus.
J Zool (Lond).
1974; 174(1): 123–148. Publisher Full Text
Colton HS:
Variation in the Dog Whelk, Thais (Purpura Auct.) lapillus.Ecology.
1922; 3(2): 146–157. Publisher Full Text
Crothers JH:
Some observations on shell-shape variation in North American populations of Nucella lapillus (L.).
Biol J Linn Soc Lond.
1983; 19(3): 237–274. Publisher Full Text
Crothers JH:
Dog-Whelks: an introduction to the biology of Nucella lapillus (L.).
Field Stud.
1985; 6: 299–360. Reference Source
Ehlers SM, Ellrich JA:
Dataset 1 in: First visual record of rare purple dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) on the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia, Canada.
F1000Research.
2016a. Data Source
Ehlers SM, Ellrich JA:
Dataset 2 in: First visual record of rare purple dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) on the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia, Canada.
F1000Research.
2016b. Data Source
Ehlers SM, Ellrich JA:
Dataset 3 in: First visual record of rare purple dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) on the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia, Canada.
F1000Research.
2016c. Data Source
Ehlers SM, Ellrich JA:
Dataset 4 in: First visual record of rare purple dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) on the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia, Canada.
F1000Research.
2016d. Data Source
Ellrich JA, Scrosati RA, Molis M:
Predator nonconsumptive effects on prey recruitment weaken with recruit density.
Ecology.
2015; 96(3): 611–616. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
Ellrich JA, Scrosati RA, Romoth K, et al.:
Adult prey neutralizes predator nonconsumptive limitation of prey recruitment.
PLoS One.
2016; 11(4): e0154572. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
Etter RJ:
Physiological stress and color polymorphism in the intertidal snail Nucella lapillus.
Evolution.
1988; 42(4): 660–680. Publisher Full Text
Etter R:
Snails. In Denny, M. W., and S. D. Gaines. Encyclopedia of Tidepools & Rocky Shores. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA. 2007; 530–537. Reference Source
Hughes RN:
Annual production of two Nova Scotian populations of Nucella lapillus (L.).
Oecologia.
1972; 8(4): 356–370. Publisher Full Text
Hunt HL, Scheibling RE:
Effects of whelk (Nucella lapillus (L.)) predation on mussel (Mytilus trossulus (Gould), M. edulis (L.)) assemblages in tidepools and on emergent rock on a wave-exposed rocky shore in Nova Scotia, Canada.
J Exp Mar Bio Ecol.
1998; 226(1): 87–113. Publisher Full Text
Moore HB:
The biology of Purpura lapillus. I. Shell variation in relation to environment.
J Mar Biol Assoc U K.
1936; 21(1): 61–89. Publisher Full Text
The field surveys were funded by a Discovery Grant (#311624) awarded to Ricardo A. Scrosati by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Ehlers SM and Ellrich JA. First visual record of rare purple dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) on the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia, Canada [version 1; peer review: 3 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2016, 5:2435 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9707.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.
Share
Open Peer Review
Current Reviewer Status:
?
Key to Reviewer Statuses
VIEWHIDE
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations
A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Cusson M. Reviewer Report For: First visual record of rare purple dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) on the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia, Canada [version 1; peer review: 3 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2016, 5:2435 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.10463.r16799)
The authors report on a sighting of purple dogwhelks in Nova Scotia. During a sampling of over 1000 dogwhelks, they observed two purple-shelled individuals.
Ehlers and Ellrich indicate that there may be a link between intertidal (air/water?)
... Continue reading
The authors report on a sighting of purple dogwhelks in Nova Scotia. During a sampling of over 1000 dogwhelks, they observed two purple-shelled individuals.
Ehlers and Ellrich indicate that there may be a link between intertidal (air/water?) temperatures and the observation of the purple dogwhelks. A purple colouring is less thermally stressful in colder settings and due to the lower temperatures, the whelks may venture out from crevices and macroalgal cover.
I work in the St. Lawrence Estuary where we have found dogwhelks in the intertidal zone although at lower quantities than those reported for Nova Scotia. Water and air temperatures are commonly under 12°C in this portion of the estuary, yet my team and I have never observed purple individuals - the typical colours for dogwhelks in this sector being white–beige to dark grey.
The findings of Ehlers and Ellrich are of interest and it is worthwhile to pursue the subject with additional observations or experimental manipulations to understand the factors that affect shell colour variability. However, their linking of the purple colour to a single, cold day (lower water temperatures in the intertidal zone) as reported in this manuscript is rather anecdotic. Rather, the authors should list potential factors (both physiological and environmental) that could potentially affect shell coloration instead of linking this observation to a single day and the possible behaviour of two rare individuals. The potential link to behaviour - lower temperatures favouring an active movement of purple-shelled individuals out from shelter - is not convincing. Mauve coloration has been seen along European coasts. As this colour is very similar to purple, in which environmental conditions were these latter observations made? Similarly, if purple has also been reported from Maine, how would these observations from Maine confirm a link to colder temperatures? I suspect that the purple colour may simply be a rare phenotypic trait that may not be at all related to environmental factors (purple shells may be the albino individuals in dogwhelk populations?).
Nevertheless, I do salute the authors for this valuable natural history observation that must be recorded. Thank you as well to F1000 for allowing the publication of such observations.
Other comments:
Datasets: I do not understand why the data were separated into four distinct data sets, one for each date. I suggest a graph presenting all average temperatures coupled with the occurrence of white/brown and purple coloration. In the references, the authors list separate temperature data sets (one for each day). These data sources should be combined (not be separate) so as to avoid artificially increasing the number of publications.
The observation date of June 16, the day on which the cool temperatures (12.3°C, n = 96) were recorded, is not presented in the companion data sets. Rather, I would prefer including a graph showing the recorded temperature for each relevant date.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.
Cusson M. Reviewer Report For: First visual record of rare purple dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) on the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia, Canada [version 1; peer review: 3 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2016, 5:2435 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.10463.r16799)
Julius Ellrich, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Canada
23 Aug 2017
Author Response
The authors report on a sighting of purple dogwhelks in Nova Scotia. During a sampling of over 1000 dogwhelks, they observed two purple-shelled individuals.
Ehlers and Ellrich indicate that
...
Continue readingThe authors report on a sighting of purple dogwhelks in Nova Scotia. During a sampling of over 1000 dogwhelks, they observed two purple-shelled individuals.
Ehlers and Ellrich indicate that there may be a link between intertidal (air/water?) temperatures and the observation of the purple dogwhelks. A purple colouring is less thermally stressful in colder settings and due to the lower temperatures, the whelks may venture out from crevices and macroalgal cover.
I work in the St. Lawrence Estuary where we have found dogwhelks in the intertidal zone although at lower quantities than those reported for Nova Scotia. Water and air temperatures are commonly under 12°C in this portion of the estuary, yet my team and I have never observed purple individuals - the typical colours for dogwhelks in this sector being white–beige to dark grey.
The findings of Ehlers and Ellrichare of interest and it is worthwhile to pursue the subject with additional observations or experimental manipulations to understand the factors that affect shell colour variability. However, their linking of the purple colour to a single, cold day (lower water temperatures in the intertidal zone) as reported in this manuscript is rather anecdotic. Rather, the authors should list potential factors (both physiological and environmental) that could potentially affect shell coloration instead of linking this observation to a single day and the possible behaviour of two rare individuals. The potential link to behaviour - lower temperatures favouring an active movement of purple-shelled individuals out from shelter - is not convincing. Mauve coloration has been seen along European coasts. As this colour is very similar to purple, in which environmental conditions were these latter observations made? Similarly, if purple has also been reported from Maine, how would these observations from Maine confirm a link to colder temperatures? I suspect that the purple colour may simply be a rare phenotypic trait that may not be at all related to environmental factors (purple shells may be the albino individuals in dogwhelk populations?).
Nevertheless, I do salute the authors for this valuable natural history observation that must be recorded. Thank you as well to F1000 for allowing the publication of such observations.
We appreciate the overall positive feedback on our manuscript and express our gratitude in the Acknowledgements. In the revised manuscript, we included the information that shell coloration in the dogwhelk Nucella lapillus is presumably inheritable. We agree that purple colored dogwhelks are rare. In addition, we discuss that their occurrence is likely favoured by the habitat characteristics (i.e. wave splash, presence of dense blue mussel beds and seaweed canopies) of the moderately wave-exposed coastline in Duncans Cove, Nova Scotia, which aligns closely with previous findings of rare purple colored dogwhelks along wave-exposed coasts in Massachusetts, USA (Etter 1988). Also, these habitat characteristics likely enhance the probability of finding rare purple colored dogwhelks.
Etter, R. 1988. Physiological stress and color polymorphism in the intertidal snail Nucella lapillus. Evolution. 4(2): 660-680.
---
Other comments: Datasets: I do not understand why the data were separated into four distinct data sets, one for each date. I suggest a graph presenting all average temperatures coupled with the occurrence of white/brown and purple coloration. In the references, the authors list separate temperature data sets (one for each day). These data sources should be combined (not be separate) so as to avoid artificially increasing the number of publications.
In the revised manuscript, we removed the information on temperature in favor of information on wave-exposure as well as mussel bed and seaweed canopy presence. We did so, because we think that this information explains our findings of the two purple colored dogwhelks more conclusively. ---
The observation date of June 16, the day on which the cool temperatures (12.3°C, n = 96) were recorded, is not presented in the companion data sets. Rather, I would prefer including a graph showing the recorded temperature for each relevant date.
The correct temperature data for 16 June 2016 was actually included, but unfortunately labeled wrong (i.e. 12 June 2016) in the companion data set. We apologize for the confusion. For the reasons discussed above, we removed the information on temperature from the revised manuscript.
---
The authors report on a sighting of purple dogwhelks in Nova Scotia. During a sampling of over 1000 dogwhelks, they observed two purple-shelled individuals.
Ehlers and Ellrich indicate that there may be a link between intertidal (air/water?) temperatures and the observation of the purple dogwhelks. A purple colouring is less thermally stressful in colder settings and due to the lower temperatures, the whelks may venture out from crevices and macroalgal cover.
I work in the St. Lawrence Estuary where we have found dogwhelks in the intertidal zone although at lower quantities than those reported for Nova Scotia. Water and air temperatures are commonly under 12°C in this portion of the estuary, yet my team and I have never observed purple individuals - the typical colours for dogwhelks in this sector being white–beige to dark grey.
The findings of Ehlers and Ellrichare of interest and it is worthwhile to pursue the subject with additional observations or experimental manipulations to understand the factors that affect shell colour variability. However, their linking of the purple colour to a single, cold day (lower water temperatures in the intertidal zone) as reported in this manuscript is rather anecdotic. Rather, the authors should list potential factors (both physiological and environmental) that could potentially affect shell coloration instead of linking this observation to a single day and the possible behaviour of two rare individuals. The potential link to behaviour - lower temperatures favouring an active movement of purple-shelled individuals out from shelter - is not convincing. Mauve coloration has been seen along European coasts. As this colour is very similar to purple, in which environmental conditions were these latter observations made? Similarly, if purple has also been reported from Maine, how would these observations from Maine confirm a link to colder temperatures? I suspect that the purple colour may simply be a rare phenotypic trait that may not be at all related to environmental factors (purple shells may be the albino individuals in dogwhelk populations?).
Nevertheless, I do salute the authors for this valuable natural history observation that must be recorded. Thank you as well to F1000 for allowing the publication of such observations.
We appreciate the overall positive feedback on our manuscript and express our gratitude in the Acknowledgements. In the revised manuscript, we included the information that shell coloration in the dogwhelk Nucella lapillus is presumably inheritable. We agree that purple colored dogwhelks are rare. In addition, we discuss that their occurrence is likely favoured by the habitat characteristics (i.e. wave splash, presence of dense blue mussel beds and seaweed canopies) of the moderately wave-exposed coastline in Duncans Cove, Nova Scotia, which aligns closely with previous findings of rare purple colored dogwhelks along wave-exposed coasts in Massachusetts, USA (Etter 1988). Also, these habitat characteristics likely enhance the probability of finding rare purple colored dogwhelks.
Etter, R. 1988. Physiological stress and color polymorphism in the intertidal snail Nucella lapillus. Evolution. 4(2): 660-680.
---
Other comments: Datasets: I do not understand why the data were separated into four distinct data sets, one for each date. I suggest a graph presenting all average temperatures coupled with the occurrence of white/brown and purple coloration. In the references, the authors list separate temperature data sets (one for each day). These data sources should be combined (not be separate) so as to avoid artificially increasing the number of publications.
In the revised manuscript, we removed the information on temperature in favor of information on wave-exposure as well as mussel bed and seaweed canopy presence. We did so, because we think that this information explains our findings of the two purple colored dogwhelks more conclusively. ---
The observation date of June 16, the day on which the cool temperatures (12.3°C, n = 96) were recorded, is not presented in the companion data sets. Rather, I would prefer including a graph showing the recorded temperature for each relevant date.
The correct temperature data for 16 June 2016 was actually included, but unfortunately labeled wrong (i.e. 12 June 2016) in the companion data set. We apologize for the confusion. For the reasons discussed above, we removed the information on temperature from the revised manuscript.
---
Competing Interests:No competing interests were disclosed.Close
Julius Ellrich, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Canada
23 Aug 2017
Author Response
The authors report on a sighting of purple dogwhelks in Nova Scotia. During a sampling of over 1000 dogwhelks, they observed two purple-shelled individuals.
Ehlers and Ellrich indicate that
...
Continue readingThe authors report on a sighting of purple dogwhelks in Nova Scotia. During a sampling of over 1000 dogwhelks, they observed two purple-shelled individuals.
Ehlers and Ellrich indicate that there may be a link between intertidal (air/water?) temperatures and the observation of the purple dogwhelks. A purple colouring is less thermally stressful in colder settings and due to the lower temperatures, the whelks may venture out from crevices and macroalgal cover.
I work in the St. Lawrence Estuary where we have found dogwhelks in the intertidal zone although at lower quantities than those reported for Nova Scotia. Water and air temperatures are commonly under 12°C in this portion of the estuary, yet my team and I have never observed purple individuals - the typical colours for dogwhelks in this sector being white–beige to dark grey.
The findings of Ehlers and Ellrichare of interest and it is worthwhile to pursue the subject with additional observations or experimental manipulations to understand the factors that affect shell colour variability. However, their linking of the purple colour to a single, cold day (lower water temperatures in the intertidal zone) as reported in this manuscript is rather anecdotic. Rather, the authors should list potential factors (both physiological and environmental) that could potentially affect shell coloration instead of linking this observation to a single day and the possible behaviour of two rare individuals. The potential link to behaviour - lower temperatures favouring an active movement of purple-shelled individuals out from shelter - is not convincing. Mauve coloration has been seen along European coasts. As this colour is very similar to purple, in which environmental conditions were these latter observations made? Similarly, if purple has also been reported from Maine, how would these observations from Maine confirm a link to colder temperatures? I suspect that the purple colour may simply be a rare phenotypic trait that may not be at all related to environmental factors (purple shells may be the albino individuals in dogwhelk populations?).
Nevertheless, I do salute the authors for this valuable natural history observation that must be recorded. Thank you as well to F1000 for allowing the publication of such observations.
We appreciate the overall positive feedback on our manuscript and express our gratitude in the Acknowledgements. In the revised manuscript, we included the information that shell coloration in the dogwhelk Nucella lapillus is presumably inheritable. We agree that purple colored dogwhelks are rare. In addition, we discuss that their occurrence is likely favoured by the habitat characteristics (i.e. wave splash, presence of dense blue mussel beds and seaweed canopies) of the moderately wave-exposed coastline in Duncans Cove, Nova Scotia, which aligns closely with previous findings of rare purple colored dogwhelks along wave-exposed coasts in Massachusetts, USA (Etter 1988). Also, these habitat characteristics likely enhance the probability of finding rare purple colored dogwhelks.
Etter, R. 1988. Physiological stress and color polymorphism in the intertidal snail Nucella lapillus. Evolution. 4(2): 660-680.
---
Other comments: Datasets: I do not understand why the data were separated into four distinct data sets, one for each date. I suggest a graph presenting all average temperatures coupled with the occurrence of white/brown and purple coloration. In the references, the authors list separate temperature data sets (one for each day). These data sources should be combined (not be separate) so as to avoid artificially increasing the number of publications.
In the revised manuscript, we removed the information on temperature in favor of information on wave-exposure as well as mussel bed and seaweed canopy presence. We did so, because we think that this information explains our findings of the two purple colored dogwhelks more conclusively. ---
The observation date of June 16, the day on which the cool temperatures (12.3°C, n = 96) were recorded, is not presented in the companion data sets. Rather, I would prefer including a graph showing the recorded temperature for each relevant date.
The correct temperature data for 16 June 2016 was actually included, but unfortunately labeled wrong (i.e. 12 June 2016) in the companion data set. We apologize for the confusion. For the reasons discussed above, we removed the information on temperature from the revised manuscript.
---
The authors report on a sighting of purple dogwhelks in Nova Scotia. During a sampling of over 1000 dogwhelks, they observed two purple-shelled individuals.
Ehlers and Ellrich indicate that there may be a link between intertidal (air/water?) temperatures and the observation of the purple dogwhelks. A purple colouring is less thermally stressful in colder settings and due to the lower temperatures, the whelks may venture out from crevices and macroalgal cover.
I work in the St. Lawrence Estuary where we have found dogwhelks in the intertidal zone although at lower quantities than those reported for Nova Scotia. Water and air temperatures are commonly under 12°C in this portion of the estuary, yet my team and I have never observed purple individuals - the typical colours for dogwhelks in this sector being white–beige to dark grey.
The findings of Ehlers and Ellrichare of interest and it is worthwhile to pursue the subject with additional observations or experimental manipulations to understand the factors that affect shell colour variability. However, their linking of the purple colour to a single, cold day (lower water temperatures in the intertidal zone) as reported in this manuscript is rather anecdotic. Rather, the authors should list potential factors (both physiological and environmental) that could potentially affect shell coloration instead of linking this observation to a single day and the possible behaviour of two rare individuals. The potential link to behaviour - lower temperatures favouring an active movement of purple-shelled individuals out from shelter - is not convincing. Mauve coloration has been seen along European coasts. As this colour is very similar to purple, in which environmental conditions were these latter observations made? Similarly, if purple has also been reported from Maine, how would these observations from Maine confirm a link to colder temperatures? I suspect that the purple colour may simply be a rare phenotypic trait that may not be at all related to environmental factors (purple shells may be the albino individuals in dogwhelk populations?).
Nevertheless, I do salute the authors for this valuable natural history observation that must be recorded. Thank you as well to F1000 for allowing the publication of such observations.
We appreciate the overall positive feedback on our manuscript and express our gratitude in the Acknowledgements. In the revised manuscript, we included the information that shell coloration in the dogwhelk Nucella lapillus is presumably inheritable. We agree that purple colored dogwhelks are rare. In addition, we discuss that their occurrence is likely favoured by the habitat characteristics (i.e. wave splash, presence of dense blue mussel beds and seaweed canopies) of the moderately wave-exposed coastline in Duncans Cove, Nova Scotia, which aligns closely with previous findings of rare purple colored dogwhelks along wave-exposed coasts in Massachusetts, USA (Etter 1988). Also, these habitat characteristics likely enhance the probability of finding rare purple colored dogwhelks.
Etter, R. 1988. Physiological stress and color polymorphism in the intertidal snail Nucella lapillus. Evolution. 4(2): 660-680.
---
Other comments: Datasets: I do not understand why the data were separated into four distinct data sets, one for each date. I suggest a graph presenting all average temperatures coupled with the occurrence of white/brown and purple coloration. In the references, the authors list separate temperature data sets (one for each day). These data sources should be combined (not be separate) so as to avoid artificially increasing the number of publications.
In the revised manuscript, we removed the information on temperature in favor of information on wave-exposure as well as mussel bed and seaweed canopy presence. We did so, because we think that this information explains our findings of the two purple colored dogwhelks more conclusively. ---
The observation date of June 16, the day on which the cool temperatures (12.3°C, n = 96) were recorded, is not presented in the companion data sets. Rather, I would prefer including a graph showing the recorded temperature for each relevant date.
The correct temperature data for 16 June 2016 was actually included, but unfortunately labeled wrong (i.e. 12 June 2016) in the companion data set. We apologize for the confusion. For the reasons discussed above, we removed the information on temperature from the revised manuscript.
---
Competing Interests:No competing interests were disclosed.Close
Clements JC. Reviewer Report For: First visual record of rare purple dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) on the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia, Canada [version 1; peer review: 3 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2016, 5:2435 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.10463.r16798)
The article by Ehlers & Ellrich qualitatively documents the first record of the Nucella lapillus purple morph on the east coast of Canada. The authors also relate the observations of this colour morph to temperature, suggesting that cooler temperatures may
... Continue reading
The article by Ehlers & Ellrich qualitatively documents the first record of the Nucella lapillus purple morph on the east coast of Canada. The authors also relate the observations of this colour morph to temperature, suggesting that cooler temperatures may allow this colour morph to become more active outside of rock crevasses.
I very much like this article. From my perspective, there are not enough outlets for basic biological observations such as this, which can serve as the basis for novel and important hypotheses. It is comforting to see F1000Research promoting observational records!
I recommend that this observation be indexed once minor revisions are made to the article, which I highlight below:
The authors state that temperatures on the date of observation (16 June 2016) were cool relative to 3 other sampling dates. However, temperature data is not presented for 16 June (but is presented for 12 June). I would suspect that the temperature data for 12 June is not an accurate representation of those on 16 June. This can be rectified by including HOBO logger data for 16 June (if the authors have it) or by utilizing historical sea surface temperatures from online databases (e.g. DFO, NOAA, GoSL, etc.).
Aside from mentioning that some colour morphs are more sensitive to temperatures than others, the authors do not provide much in the way of context for why this species exhibits such tremendous variation in shell colour. What is the ecological and evolutionary benefit (or hindrance) of having such variation in shell colour? A brief mention of this in the introduction and/or discussion would be useful.
Although temperature means and their errors are reported in the abstract, I’m not a fan of downloading 4 separate Excel files of temperature data. I would suggest including a single graph of 24 h temperature recordings (or a bar chart of temperature means +- SE) for each sampling date. This will help the reader visualize the differences in temperature between the date when purple morphs were observed and the dates they were not.
I think the authors can add some more discussion points to the Results and Discussion section. Some specific suggestions are highlighted below:
Some mention of the origin of purple morphs in eastern Canada would be nice. Do you think purple morphs have existed in eastern Canada for some time and were simply not observed until now? Or do you think this might be a consequence of ocean warming, with purple morphs moving to more northerly latitudes to avoid high temperatures? This is especially relevant given that the authors suggest that purple colour morphs do not fare well in higher temperatures.
Some additional suggestions for future research are also warranted. For example, targeted sampling over a given time period in which temperatures vary might give a more quantitative understanding of N. lapillus colour morphs on the shores of Nova Scotia. Such a project would not only provide a quantitative description of N. lapillus colour morphs in eastern Canada (which is currently lacking), but could also inform on spatial and temporal overlaps in N. lapillus colour morphs and lend field evidence for behavioural responses to temperature (which would complement the authors’ suggestion of lab experiments well). Genetic testing could also provide evidence for the origin of these animals, advocating for or against a potential northward displacement in response to warming temperatures.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.
Clements JC. Reviewer Report For: First visual record of rare purple dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) on the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia, Canada [version 1; peer review: 3 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2016, 5:2435 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.10463.r16798)
Julius Ellrich, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Canada
23 Aug 2017
Author Response
The article by Ehlers & Ellrich qualitatively documents the first record of the Nucella lapillus purple morph on the east coast of Canada. The authors also relate the observations of
...
Continue readingThe article by Ehlers & Ellrich qualitatively documents the first record of the Nucella lapillus purple morph on the east coast of Canada. The authors also relate the observations of this colour morph to temperature, suggesting that cooler temperatures may allow this color morph to become more active outside of rock crevasses.
I very much like this article. From my perspective, there are not enough outlets for basic biological observations such as this, which can serve as the basis for novel and important hypotheses. It is comforting to see F1000Research promoting observational records! I recommend that this observation be published once minor revisions are made to the article, which I highlight below:
We are pleased about the thoughtful assessment of our article and express our gratefulness in the Acknowledgements of our revised article. Below, we address the comments. ---
1. The authors state that temperatures on the date of observation (16 June 2016) were cool relative to 3 other sampling dates. However, temperature data is not presented for 16 June (but is presented for 12 June). I would suspect that the temperature data for 12 June is not an accurate representation of those on 16 June. This can be rectified by including HOBO logger data for 16 June (if the authors have it) or by utilizing historical sea surface temperatures from online databases (e.g. DFO, NOAA, GoSL, etc.).
The temperature data recorded by our HOBO loggers were actually from the dogwhelk collection day (i.e. 16 June 2016), but not from the 12 June 2016. When compiling the temperature data for the supplementary material of the manuscript, we accidentally labeled these data wrong. We are apologizing for the confusion. However, we excluded the temperature information from our revised manuscript in favor of information (i.e. wave-exposure, presence of mussel patches and seaweed canopies) that explains the finding of the two purple colored dogwhelks more conclusively. ---
Aside from mentioning that some colour morphs are more sensitive to temperatures than others, the authors do not provide much in the way of context for why this species exhibits such tremendous variation in shell colour. What is the ecological and evolutionary benefit (or hindrance) of having such variation in shell color? A brief mention of this in the introduction and/or discussion would be useful.
We included a brief statement on the consequences of shell color variation in the Introduction of the revised manuscript. ---
3. Although temperature means and their errors are reported in the abstract, I’m not a fan of downloading 4 separate Excel files of temperature data. I would suggest including a single graph of 24 h temperature recordings (or a bar chart of temperature means +- SE) for each sampling date. This will help the reader visualize the differences in temperature between the date when purple morphs were observed and the dates they were not.
In the revised manuscript, we replaced the temperature information by other environmental information as outlined above. ---
4. I think the authors can add some more discussion points to the Results and Discussion section. Some specific suggestions are highlighted below: i. Some mention of the origin of purple morphs in eastern Canada would be nice. Do you think purple morphs have existed in eastern Canada for some time and were simply not observed until now? Or do you think this might be a consequence of ocean warming, with purple morphs moving to more northerly latitudes to avoid high temperatures? This is especially relevant given that the authors suggest that purple color morphs do not fare well in higher temperatures.
We think that purple colored dogwhelks have simply not been reported for the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia yet, because they are relatively rare compared to the large quantities of the brown and white colored individuals commonly found on this coast. Purple colored individuals having moved to more northerly latitudes in response to ocean warming appears unlikely, because dogwhelks have a restricted activity range (which lies within tens of meters), and lack pelagic larval dispersal (Crothers 1985).
To add another discussion point to Results & Discussion in the revised manuscript, we included a paragraph that discusses the environmental influences (i.e. wave-exposure, presence of mussel patches and seaweed canopies) that may favor the occurrence of the rare purple colored dogwhelks on the coast.
Crothers, J. H. 1985. Dog-Whelks: an introduction to the biology of Nucella lapillus (L.). Field Studies. 6: 299-360. ---
ii. Some additional suggestions for future research are also warranted. For example, targeted sampling over a given time period in which temperatures vary might give a more quantitative understanding of N. lapillus colour morphs on the shores of Nova Scotia. Such a project would not only provide a quantitative description of n. lapillus colour morphs in eastern Canada (which is currently lacking), but could also inform on spatial and temporal overlaps in N. lapillus colour morphs and lend field evidence for behavioural responses to temperature (which would complement the authors’ suggestion of lab experiments well). Genetic testing could also provide evidence for the origin of these animals, advocating for or against a potential northward displacement in response to warming temperatures.
We suggested future research examining dogwhelk activity patterns in relation to shell color and temperature in the Results & Discussion of the revised manuscript. As discussed above, we deem that northward movement of dogwhelks in response to warming temperatures is unlikely. ---
The article by Ehlers & Ellrich qualitatively documents the first record of the Nucella lapillus purple morph on the east coast of Canada. The authors also relate the observations of this colour morph to temperature, suggesting that cooler temperatures may allow this color morph to become more active outside of rock crevasses.
I very much like this article. From my perspective, there are not enough outlets for basic biological observations such as this, which can serve as the basis for novel and important hypotheses. It is comforting to see F1000Research promoting observational records! I recommend that this observation be published once minor revisions are made to the article, which I highlight below:
We are pleased about the thoughtful assessment of our article and express our gratefulness in the Acknowledgements of our revised article. Below, we address the comments. ---
1. The authors state that temperatures on the date of observation (16 June 2016) were cool relative to 3 other sampling dates. However, temperature data is not presented for 16 June (but is presented for 12 June). I would suspect that the temperature data for 12 June is not an accurate representation of those on 16 June. This can be rectified by including HOBO logger data for 16 June (if the authors have it) or by utilizing historical sea surface temperatures from online databases (e.g. DFO, NOAA, GoSL, etc.).
The temperature data recorded by our HOBO loggers were actually from the dogwhelk collection day (i.e. 16 June 2016), but not from the 12 June 2016. When compiling the temperature data for the supplementary material of the manuscript, we accidentally labeled these data wrong. We are apologizing for the confusion. However, we excluded the temperature information from our revised manuscript in favor of information (i.e. wave-exposure, presence of mussel patches and seaweed canopies) that explains the finding of the two purple colored dogwhelks more conclusively. ---
Aside from mentioning that some colour morphs are more sensitive to temperatures than others, the authors do not provide much in the way of context for why this species exhibits such tremendous variation in shell colour. What is the ecological and evolutionary benefit (or hindrance) of having such variation in shell color? A brief mention of this in the introduction and/or discussion would be useful.
We included a brief statement on the consequences of shell color variation in the Introduction of the revised manuscript. ---
3. Although temperature means and their errors are reported in the abstract, I’m not a fan of downloading 4 separate Excel files of temperature data. I would suggest including a single graph of 24 h temperature recordings (or a bar chart of temperature means +- SE) for each sampling date. This will help the reader visualize the differences in temperature between the date when purple morphs were observed and the dates they were not.
In the revised manuscript, we replaced the temperature information by other environmental information as outlined above. ---
4. I think the authors can add some more discussion points to the Results and Discussion section. Some specific suggestions are highlighted below: i. Some mention of the origin of purple morphs in eastern Canada would be nice. Do you think purple morphs have existed in eastern Canada for some time and were simply not observed until now? Or do you think this might be a consequence of ocean warming, with purple morphs moving to more northerly latitudes to avoid high temperatures? This is especially relevant given that the authors suggest that purple color morphs do not fare well in higher temperatures.
We think that purple colored dogwhelks have simply not been reported for the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia yet, because they are relatively rare compared to the large quantities of the brown and white colored individuals commonly found on this coast. Purple colored individuals having moved to more northerly latitudes in response to ocean warming appears unlikely, because dogwhelks have a restricted activity range (which lies within tens of meters), and lack pelagic larval dispersal (Crothers 1985).
To add another discussion point to Results & Discussion in the revised manuscript, we included a paragraph that discusses the environmental influences (i.e. wave-exposure, presence of mussel patches and seaweed canopies) that may favor the occurrence of the rare purple colored dogwhelks on the coast.
Crothers, J. H. 1985. Dog-Whelks: an introduction to the biology of Nucella lapillus (L.). Field Studies. 6: 299-360. ---
ii. Some additional suggestions for future research are also warranted. For example, targeted sampling over a given time period in which temperatures vary might give a more quantitative understanding of N. lapillus colour morphs on the shores of Nova Scotia. Such a project would not only provide a quantitative description of n. lapillus colour morphs in eastern Canada (which is currently lacking), but could also inform on spatial and temporal overlaps in N. lapillus colour morphs and lend field evidence for behavioural responses to temperature (which would complement the authors’ suggestion of lab experiments well). Genetic testing could also provide evidence for the origin of these animals, advocating for or against a potential northward displacement in response to warming temperatures.
We suggested future research examining dogwhelk activity patterns in relation to shell color and temperature in the Results & Discussion of the revised manuscript. As discussed above, we deem that northward movement of dogwhelks in response to warming temperatures is unlikely. ---
Competing Interests:No competing interests were disclosed.Close
Julius Ellrich, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Canada
23 Aug 2017
Author Response
The article by Ehlers & Ellrich qualitatively documents the first record of the Nucella lapillus purple morph on the east coast of Canada. The authors also relate the observations of
...
Continue readingThe article by Ehlers & Ellrich qualitatively documents the first record of the Nucella lapillus purple morph on the east coast of Canada. The authors also relate the observations of this colour morph to temperature, suggesting that cooler temperatures may allow this color morph to become more active outside of rock crevasses.
I very much like this article. From my perspective, there are not enough outlets for basic biological observations such as this, which can serve as the basis for novel and important hypotheses. It is comforting to see F1000Research promoting observational records! I recommend that this observation be published once minor revisions are made to the article, which I highlight below:
We are pleased about the thoughtful assessment of our article and express our gratefulness in the Acknowledgements of our revised article. Below, we address the comments. ---
1. The authors state that temperatures on the date of observation (16 June 2016) were cool relative to 3 other sampling dates. However, temperature data is not presented for 16 June (but is presented for 12 June). I would suspect that the temperature data for 12 June is not an accurate representation of those on 16 June. This can be rectified by including HOBO logger data for 16 June (if the authors have it) or by utilizing historical sea surface temperatures from online databases (e.g. DFO, NOAA, GoSL, etc.).
The temperature data recorded by our HOBO loggers were actually from the dogwhelk collection day (i.e. 16 June 2016), but not from the 12 June 2016. When compiling the temperature data for the supplementary material of the manuscript, we accidentally labeled these data wrong. We are apologizing for the confusion. However, we excluded the temperature information from our revised manuscript in favor of information (i.e. wave-exposure, presence of mussel patches and seaweed canopies) that explains the finding of the two purple colored dogwhelks more conclusively. ---
Aside from mentioning that some colour morphs are more sensitive to temperatures than others, the authors do not provide much in the way of context for why this species exhibits such tremendous variation in shell colour. What is the ecological and evolutionary benefit (or hindrance) of having such variation in shell color? A brief mention of this in the introduction and/or discussion would be useful.
We included a brief statement on the consequences of shell color variation in the Introduction of the revised manuscript. ---
3. Although temperature means and their errors are reported in the abstract, I’m not a fan of downloading 4 separate Excel files of temperature data. I would suggest including a single graph of 24 h temperature recordings (or a bar chart of temperature means +- SE) for each sampling date. This will help the reader visualize the differences in temperature between the date when purple morphs were observed and the dates they were not.
In the revised manuscript, we replaced the temperature information by other environmental information as outlined above. ---
4. I think the authors can add some more discussion points to the Results and Discussion section. Some specific suggestions are highlighted below: i. Some mention of the origin of purple morphs in eastern Canada would be nice. Do you think purple morphs have existed in eastern Canada for some time and were simply not observed until now? Or do you think this might be a consequence of ocean warming, with purple morphs moving to more northerly latitudes to avoid high temperatures? This is especially relevant given that the authors suggest that purple color morphs do not fare well in higher temperatures.
We think that purple colored dogwhelks have simply not been reported for the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia yet, because they are relatively rare compared to the large quantities of the brown and white colored individuals commonly found on this coast. Purple colored individuals having moved to more northerly latitudes in response to ocean warming appears unlikely, because dogwhelks have a restricted activity range (which lies within tens of meters), and lack pelagic larval dispersal (Crothers 1985).
To add another discussion point to Results & Discussion in the revised manuscript, we included a paragraph that discusses the environmental influences (i.e. wave-exposure, presence of mussel patches and seaweed canopies) that may favor the occurrence of the rare purple colored dogwhelks on the coast.
Crothers, J. H. 1985. Dog-Whelks: an introduction to the biology of Nucella lapillus (L.). Field Studies. 6: 299-360. ---
ii. Some additional suggestions for future research are also warranted. For example, targeted sampling over a given time period in which temperatures vary might give a more quantitative understanding of N. lapillus colour morphs on the shores of Nova Scotia. Such a project would not only provide a quantitative description of n. lapillus colour morphs in eastern Canada (which is currently lacking), but could also inform on spatial and temporal overlaps in N. lapillus colour morphs and lend field evidence for behavioural responses to temperature (which would complement the authors’ suggestion of lab experiments well). Genetic testing could also provide evidence for the origin of these animals, advocating for or against a potential northward displacement in response to warming temperatures.
We suggested future research examining dogwhelk activity patterns in relation to shell color and temperature in the Results & Discussion of the revised manuscript. As discussed above, we deem that northward movement of dogwhelks in response to warming temperatures is unlikely. ---
The article by Ehlers & Ellrich qualitatively documents the first record of the Nucella lapillus purple morph on the east coast of Canada. The authors also relate the observations of this colour morph to temperature, suggesting that cooler temperatures may allow this color morph to become more active outside of rock crevasses.
I very much like this article. From my perspective, there are not enough outlets for basic biological observations such as this, which can serve as the basis for novel and important hypotheses. It is comforting to see F1000Research promoting observational records! I recommend that this observation be published once minor revisions are made to the article, which I highlight below:
We are pleased about the thoughtful assessment of our article and express our gratefulness in the Acknowledgements of our revised article. Below, we address the comments. ---
1. The authors state that temperatures on the date of observation (16 June 2016) were cool relative to 3 other sampling dates. However, temperature data is not presented for 16 June (but is presented for 12 June). I would suspect that the temperature data for 12 June is not an accurate representation of those on 16 June. This can be rectified by including HOBO logger data for 16 June (if the authors have it) or by utilizing historical sea surface temperatures from online databases (e.g. DFO, NOAA, GoSL, etc.).
The temperature data recorded by our HOBO loggers were actually from the dogwhelk collection day (i.e. 16 June 2016), but not from the 12 June 2016. When compiling the temperature data for the supplementary material of the manuscript, we accidentally labeled these data wrong. We are apologizing for the confusion. However, we excluded the temperature information from our revised manuscript in favor of information (i.e. wave-exposure, presence of mussel patches and seaweed canopies) that explains the finding of the two purple colored dogwhelks more conclusively. ---
Aside from mentioning that some colour morphs are more sensitive to temperatures than others, the authors do not provide much in the way of context for why this species exhibits such tremendous variation in shell colour. What is the ecological and evolutionary benefit (or hindrance) of having such variation in shell color? A brief mention of this in the introduction and/or discussion would be useful.
We included a brief statement on the consequences of shell color variation in the Introduction of the revised manuscript. ---
3. Although temperature means and their errors are reported in the abstract, I’m not a fan of downloading 4 separate Excel files of temperature data. I would suggest including a single graph of 24 h temperature recordings (or a bar chart of temperature means +- SE) for each sampling date. This will help the reader visualize the differences in temperature between the date when purple morphs were observed and the dates they were not.
In the revised manuscript, we replaced the temperature information by other environmental information as outlined above. ---
4. I think the authors can add some more discussion points to the Results and Discussion section. Some specific suggestions are highlighted below: i. Some mention of the origin of purple morphs in eastern Canada would be nice. Do you think purple morphs have existed in eastern Canada for some time and were simply not observed until now? Or do you think this might be a consequence of ocean warming, with purple morphs moving to more northerly latitudes to avoid high temperatures? This is especially relevant given that the authors suggest that purple color morphs do not fare well in higher temperatures.
We think that purple colored dogwhelks have simply not been reported for the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia yet, because they are relatively rare compared to the large quantities of the brown and white colored individuals commonly found on this coast. Purple colored individuals having moved to more northerly latitudes in response to ocean warming appears unlikely, because dogwhelks have a restricted activity range (which lies within tens of meters), and lack pelagic larval dispersal (Crothers 1985).
To add another discussion point to Results & Discussion in the revised manuscript, we included a paragraph that discusses the environmental influences (i.e. wave-exposure, presence of mussel patches and seaweed canopies) that may favor the occurrence of the rare purple colored dogwhelks on the coast.
Crothers, J. H. 1985. Dog-Whelks: an introduction to the biology of Nucella lapillus (L.). Field Studies. 6: 299-360. ---
ii. Some additional suggestions for future research are also warranted. For example, targeted sampling over a given time period in which temperatures vary might give a more quantitative understanding of N. lapillus colour morphs on the shores of Nova Scotia. Such a project would not only provide a quantitative description of n. lapillus colour morphs in eastern Canada (which is currently lacking), but could also inform on spatial and temporal overlaps in N. lapillus colour morphs and lend field evidence for behavioural responses to temperature (which would complement the authors’ suggestion of lab experiments well). Genetic testing could also provide evidence for the origin of these animals, advocating for or against a potential northward displacement in response to warming temperatures.
We suggested future research examining dogwhelk activity patterns in relation to shell color and temperature in the Results & Discussion of the revised manuscript. As discussed above, we deem that northward movement of dogwhelks in response to warming temperatures is unlikely. ---
Competing Interests:No competing interests were disclosed.Close
Courtenay SC. Reviewer Report For: First visual record of rare purple dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) on the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia, Canada [version 1; peer review: 3 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2016, 5:2435 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.10463.r16981)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation.
Reviewer Report14 Oct 2016
Simon C. Courtenay,
School of Environment, Resources and Sustainability (SERS), Canadian Water Network (CWN), University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
This note reports, for the first time, the presence of a rare colour morph (purple) of the dogwhelk (Nucella lapillis) near Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. This is an interesting observation which will be strengthened by two minor revisions to the
... Continue reading
This note reports, for the first time, the presence of a rare colour morph (purple) of the dogwhelk (Nucella lapillis) near Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. This is an interesting observation which will be strengthened by two minor revisions to the presentation.
First, it would be helpful in the Abstract and Methods to indicate that dogwhelks were (presumably) sampled during low tide when they were exposed to the air rather than in water.
Secondly, temperature records are provided which would benefit from clarification. Judging from the range of temperatures, the temperature loggers were exposed to water during some of the tidal cycle and to air the rest of the time (i.e. they were placed in the intertidal). It would be helpful to know at what point in this temperature record the whelks were sampled. It might be that there are better measures of temperature to report than the daily average (and why do you report the sample size for temperatures recorded on one of your sample days (n=96) but not the other days? Should we assume the same n?).
Also, the whelks were sampled on June 16, 2016 but the nearest temperature record is June 12, 2016. Yet the abstract talks about the temperature on the day of whelk sampling. Did I miss something?
Finally, it would be useful to report whether you archived these unusual specimens, and perhaps some of the more usual colour morphs, in case a future researcher wants to look at them for possible morphological differences from the more common colour morphs. You note that there are physiological differences. With that said, I am delighted that there is a place that basic biological observations like these can still be reported. Well done F1000Research!
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.
Courtenay SC. Reviewer Report For: First visual record of rare purple dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) on the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia, Canada [version 1; peer review: 3 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2016, 5:2435 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.10463.r16981)
Julius Ellrich, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Canada
23 Aug 2017
Author Response
This note reports, for the first time, the presence of a rare colour morph (purple) of the dogwhelk (Nucella lapillus) near Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. This is an interesting observation
...
Continue readingThis note reports, for the first time, the presence of a rare colour morph (purple) of the dogwhelk (Nucella lapillus) near Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. This is an interesting observation which will be strengthened by two minor revisions to the presentation.
We appreciate the positive feedback on our report and express our gratitude in the Acknowledgements. We address each comment below. ---
First, it would be helpful in the Abstract and Methods to indicate that dogwhelks were (presumably) sampled during low tide when they were exposed to the air rather than in water.
We added the information that dogwhelk collections and observations were done during low tide in the Abstract and Methods of the revised manuscript. ---
Secondly, temperature records are provided which would benefit from clarification. Judging from the range of temperatures, the temperature loggers were exposed to water during some of the tidal cycle and to air the rest of the time (i.e. they were placed in the intertidal). It would be helpful to know at what point in this temperature record the whelks were sampled. It might be that there are better measures of temperature to report than the daily average (and why do you report the sample size for temperatures recorded on one of your sample days (n=96) but not the other days? Should we assume the same n?).
Also, the whelks were sampled on June 16, 2016 but the nearest temperature record is June 12, 2016. Yet the abstract talks about the temperature on the day of whelk sampling. Did I miss something?
As noted correctly by the reviewer, the temperature loggers recorded seawater temperature (while submerged) and air temperature (while emerged). The dogwhelks were collected/sampled within two hours around each low tide. The sample size of temperature recordings was identical for all days (n= 96 temperature recordings). The temperature recordings reported for the dogwhelk collection day were actually recorded by our temperature loggers on that day (i.e. 16 June 2016). Unfortunately, we labeled them wrong (i.e. 12 June 2016) when preparing the supplementary material for the manuscript. We apologize for the confusion. However, for the revised manuscript, we chose to replace the temperature information with other environmental information (i.e. wave-exposure and presence of dense mussel patches and seaweed canopies in Duncans Cove), as this information explains our findings of the purple colored dogwhelks more conclusively. ---
Finally, it would be useful to report whether you archived these unusual specimens, and perhaps some of the more usual colour morphs, in case a future researcher wants to look at them for possible morphological differences from the more common colour morphs. You note that there are physiological differences. With that said, I am delighted that there is a place that basic biological observations like these can still be reported. Well done F1000Research!
Having collected thousands of dogwhelks in Nova Scotia over the years for manipulative experiments, we were very surprised when we discovered the two purple dogwhelks. We, thus, considered them as rare, and decided not to collect them. Instead, we took the picture (Fig. 1) to document our findings. However, we agree that archiving a collection of dogwhelk color morphs including purple individuals could be useful for future comparative studies. As we will continue our research on nonconsumptive predator effects using dogwhelks, we will take this opportunity to deposit a collection of dogwhelk color morphs in a zoological collection.
---
This note reports, for the first time, the presence of a rare colour morph (purple) of the dogwhelk (Nucella lapillus) near Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. This is an interesting observation which will be strengthened by two minor revisions to the presentation.
We appreciate the positive feedback on our report and express our gratitude in the Acknowledgements. We address each comment below. ---
First, it would be helpful in the Abstract and Methods to indicate that dogwhelks were (presumably) sampled during low tide when they were exposed to the air rather than in water.
We added the information that dogwhelk collections and observations were done during low tide in the Abstract and Methods of the revised manuscript. ---
Secondly, temperature records are provided which would benefit from clarification. Judging from the range of temperatures, the temperature loggers were exposed to water during some of the tidal cycle and to air the rest of the time (i.e. they were placed in the intertidal). It would be helpful to know at what point in this temperature record the whelks were sampled. It might be that there are better measures of temperature to report than the daily average (and why do you report the sample size for temperatures recorded on one of your sample days (n=96) but not the other days? Should we assume the same n?).
Also, the whelks were sampled on June 16, 2016 but the nearest temperature record is June 12, 2016. Yet the abstract talks about the temperature on the day of whelk sampling. Did I miss something?
As noted correctly by the reviewer, the temperature loggers recorded seawater temperature (while submerged) and air temperature (while emerged). The dogwhelks were collected/sampled within two hours around each low tide. The sample size of temperature recordings was identical for all days (n= 96 temperature recordings). The temperature recordings reported for the dogwhelk collection day were actually recorded by our temperature loggers on that day (i.e. 16 June 2016). Unfortunately, we labeled them wrong (i.e. 12 June 2016) when preparing the supplementary material for the manuscript. We apologize for the confusion. However, for the revised manuscript, we chose to replace the temperature information with other environmental information (i.e. wave-exposure and presence of dense mussel patches and seaweed canopies in Duncans Cove), as this information explains our findings of the purple colored dogwhelks more conclusively. ---
Finally, it would be useful to report whether you archived these unusual specimens, and perhaps some of the more usual colour morphs, in case a future researcher wants to look at them for possible morphological differences from the more common colour morphs. You note that there are physiological differences. With that said, I am delighted that there is a place that basic biological observations like these can still be reported. Well done F1000Research!
Having collected thousands of dogwhelks in Nova Scotia over the years for manipulative experiments, we were very surprised when we discovered the two purple dogwhelks. We, thus, considered them as rare, and decided not to collect them. Instead, we took the picture (Fig. 1) to document our findings. However, we agree that archiving a collection of dogwhelk color morphs including purple individuals could be useful for future comparative studies. As we will continue our research on nonconsumptive predator effects using dogwhelks, we will take this opportunity to deposit a collection of dogwhelk color morphs in a zoological collection.
---
Competing Interests:No competing interests were disclosed.Close
Julius Ellrich, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Canada
23 Aug 2017
Author Response
This note reports, for the first time, the presence of a rare colour morph (purple) of the dogwhelk (Nucella lapillus) near Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. This is an interesting observation
...
Continue readingThis note reports, for the first time, the presence of a rare colour morph (purple) of the dogwhelk (Nucella lapillus) near Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. This is an interesting observation which will be strengthened by two minor revisions to the presentation.
We appreciate the positive feedback on our report and express our gratitude in the Acknowledgements. We address each comment below. ---
First, it would be helpful in the Abstract and Methods to indicate that dogwhelks were (presumably) sampled during low tide when they were exposed to the air rather than in water.
We added the information that dogwhelk collections and observations were done during low tide in the Abstract and Methods of the revised manuscript. ---
Secondly, temperature records are provided which would benefit from clarification. Judging from the range of temperatures, the temperature loggers were exposed to water during some of the tidal cycle and to air the rest of the time (i.e. they were placed in the intertidal). It would be helpful to know at what point in this temperature record the whelks were sampled. It might be that there are better measures of temperature to report than the daily average (and why do you report the sample size for temperatures recorded on one of your sample days (n=96) but not the other days? Should we assume the same n?).
Also, the whelks were sampled on June 16, 2016 but the nearest temperature record is June 12, 2016. Yet the abstract talks about the temperature on the day of whelk sampling. Did I miss something?
As noted correctly by the reviewer, the temperature loggers recorded seawater temperature (while submerged) and air temperature (while emerged). The dogwhelks were collected/sampled within two hours around each low tide. The sample size of temperature recordings was identical for all days (n= 96 temperature recordings). The temperature recordings reported for the dogwhelk collection day were actually recorded by our temperature loggers on that day (i.e. 16 June 2016). Unfortunately, we labeled them wrong (i.e. 12 June 2016) when preparing the supplementary material for the manuscript. We apologize for the confusion. However, for the revised manuscript, we chose to replace the temperature information with other environmental information (i.e. wave-exposure and presence of dense mussel patches and seaweed canopies in Duncans Cove), as this information explains our findings of the purple colored dogwhelks more conclusively. ---
Finally, it would be useful to report whether you archived these unusual specimens, and perhaps some of the more usual colour morphs, in case a future researcher wants to look at them for possible morphological differences from the more common colour morphs. You note that there are physiological differences. With that said, I am delighted that there is a place that basic biological observations like these can still be reported. Well done F1000Research!
Having collected thousands of dogwhelks in Nova Scotia over the years for manipulative experiments, we were very surprised when we discovered the two purple dogwhelks. We, thus, considered them as rare, and decided not to collect them. Instead, we took the picture (Fig. 1) to document our findings. However, we agree that archiving a collection of dogwhelk color morphs including purple individuals could be useful for future comparative studies. As we will continue our research on nonconsumptive predator effects using dogwhelks, we will take this opportunity to deposit a collection of dogwhelk color morphs in a zoological collection.
---
This note reports, for the first time, the presence of a rare colour morph (purple) of the dogwhelk (Nucella lapillus) near Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. This is an interesting observation which will be strengthened by two minor revisions to the presentation.
We appreciate the positive feedback on our report and express our gratitude in the Acknowledgements. We address each comment below. ---
First, it would be helpful in the Abstract and Methods to indicate that dogwhelks were (presumably) sampled during low tide when they were exposed to the air rather than in water.
We added the information that dogwhelk collections and observations were done during low tide in the Abstract and Methods of the revised manuscript. ---
Secondly, temperature records are provided which would benefit from clarification. Judging from the range of temperatures, the temperature loggers were exposed to water during some of the tidal cycle and to air the rest of the time (i.e. they were placed in the intertidal). It would be helpful to know at what point in this temperature record the whelks were sampled. It might be that there are better measures of temperature to report than the daily average (and why do you report the sample size for temperatures recorded on one of your sample days (n=96) but not the other days? Should we assume the same n?).
Also, the whelks were sampled on June 16, 2016 but the nearest temperature record is June 12, 2016. Yet the abstract talks about the temperature on the day of whelk sampling. Did I miss something?
As noted correctly by the reviewer, the temperature loggers recorded seawater temperature (while submerged) and air temperature (while emerged). The dogwhelks were collected/sampled within two hours around each low tide. The sample size of temperature recordings was identical for all days (n= 96 temperature recordings). The temperature recordings reported for the dogwhelk collection day were actually recorded by our temperature loggers on that day (i.e. 16 June 2016). Unfortunately, we labeled them wrong (i.e. 12 June 2016) when preparing the supplementary material for the manuscript. We apologize for the confusion. However, for the revised manuscript, we chose to replace the temperature information with other environmental information (i.e. wave-exposure and presence of dense mussel patches and seaweed canopies in Duncans Cove), as this information explains our findings of the purple colored dogwhelks more conclusively. ---
Finally, it would be useful to report whether you archived these unusual specimens, and perhaps some of the more usual colour morphs, in case a future researcher wants to look at them for possible morphological differences from the more common colour morphs. You note that there are physiological differences. With that said, I am delighted that there is a place that basic biological observations like these can still be reported. Well done F1000Research!
Having collected thousands of dogwhelks in Nova Scotia over the years for manipulative experiments, we were very surprised when we discovered the two purple dogwhelks. We, thus, considered them as rare, and decided not to collect them. Instead, we took the picture (Fig. 1) to document our findings. However, we agree that archiving a collection of dogwhelk color morphs including purple individuals could be useful for future comparative studies. As we will continue our research on nonconsumptive predator effects using dogwhelks, we will take this opportunity to deposit a collection of dogwhelk color morphs in a zoological collection.
---
Competing Interests:No competing interests were disclosed.Close
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations -
A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Spreadsheet data files may not format correctly if your computer is using different default delimiters (symbols used to separate values into separate cells) - a spreadsheet created in one region is sometimes misinterpreted by computers in other regions. You can change the regional settings on your computer so that the spreadsheet can be interpreted correctly.
How to fix it
Save downloaded CSV file
Open spreadsheet program (e.g. Excel)
Click the ‘Data’ tab at the top
Click the ‘From text’ icon (top left)
Browse for downloaded CSV file, click ‘Import’
Ensure ‘Delimited’ radio button is selected, click ‘Next’
Check one of the appropriate delimiter checkboxes (you can visualize the formatting by looking at the data preview below these options)
Ehlers SM and Ellrich JA. Dataset 1 in: First visual record of rare purple dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) on the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia, Canada. F1000Research 2016, 5:2435 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.9707.d137308)
Spreadsheet data files may not format correctly if your computer is using different default delimiters (symbols used to separate values into separate cells) - a spreadsheet created in one region is sometimes misinterpreted by computers in other regions. You can change the regional settings on your computer so that the spreadsheet can be interpreted correctly.
How to fix it
Save downloaded CSV file
Open spreadsheet program (e.g. Excel)
Click the ‘Data’ tab at the top
Click the ‘From text’ icon (top left)
Browse for downloaded CSV file, click ‘Import’
Ensure ‘Delimited’ radio button is selected, click ‘Next’
Check one of the appropriate delimiter checkboxes (you can visualize the formatting by looking at the data preview below these options)
Ehlers SM and Ellrich JA. Dataset 2 in: First visual record of rare purple dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) on the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia, Canada. F1000Research 2016, 5:2435 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.9707.d137309)
Spreadsheet data files may not format correctly if your computer is using different default delimiters (symbols used to separate values into separate cells) - a spreadsheet created in one region is sometimes misinterpreted by computers in other regions. You can change the regional settings on your computer so that the spreadsheet can be interpreted correctly.
How to fix it
Save downloaded CSV file
Open spreadsheet program (e.g. Excel)
Click the ‘Data’ tab at the top
Click the ‘From text’ icon (top left)
Browse for downloaded CSV file, click ‘Import’
Ensure ‘Delimited’ radio button is selected, click ‘Next’
Check one of the appropriate delimiter checkboxes (you can visualize the formatting by looking at the data preview below these options)
Ehlers SM and Ellrich JA. Dataset 3 in: First visual record of rare purple dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) on the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia, Canada. F1000Research 2016, 5:2435 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.9707.d137310)
Spreadsheet data files may not format correctly if your computer is using different default delimiters (symbols used to separate values into separate cells) - a spreadsheet created in one region is sometimes misinterpreted by computers in other regions. You can change the regional settings on your computer so that the spreadsheet can be interpreted correctly.
How to fix it
Save downloaded CSV file
Open spreadsheet program (e.g. Excel)
Click the ‘Data’ tab at the top
Click the ‘From text’ icon (top left)
Browse for downloaded CSV file, click ‘Import’
Ensure ‘Delimited’ radio button is selected, click ‘Next’
Check one of the appropriate delimiter checkboxes (you can visualize the formatting by looking at the data preview below these options)
Ehlers SM and Ellrich JA. Dataset 4 in: First visual record of rare purple dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) on the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia, Canada. F1000Research 2016, 5:2435 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.9707.d137311)
Adjust parameters to alter display
View on desktop for interactive features
Includes Interactive Elements
View on desktop for interactive features
Competing Interests Policy
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests'
Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper.
You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors.
You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student).
You work at the same institute as any of the authors.
You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission.
You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published.
Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests'
You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements.
You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors.
You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on.
Stay Updated
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Comments on this article Comments (0)