ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Note
Revised

Electroantennogram response of the parasitoid, Microplitis croceipes to host-related odors: The discrepancy between relative abundance and level of antennal responses to volatile compound

[version 2; peer review: 4 approved]
PUBLISHED 09 Mar 2017
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Herbivores emit volatile organic compounds (VOCs) after feeding on plants. Parasitoids exploit these VOCs as odor cues to locate their hosts. In nature, host-related odors are emitted as blends of various compounds occurring in different proportions, and minor blend components can sometimes have profound effects on parasitoid responses. In a previous related study, we identified and quantified VOCs emitted by cotton plant-fed Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae, an herbivore host of the parasitoid Microplitis croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). In the present study, the olfactory response of female M. croceipes to synthetic versions of 15 previously identified compounds was tested in electroantennogram (EAG) bioassays. Using M. croceipes as a model species, we further asked the question: does the relative abundance of a volatile compound match the level of antennal response in parasitoids? Female M. croceipes showed varying EAG responses to test compounds, indicating different levels of bioactivity in the insect antenna. Eight compounds, including decanal, 1-octen-3-ol, 3-octanone, 2-ethylhexanol, tridecane, tetradecane, α-farnesene and bisabolene, elicited EAG responses above or equal to the 50th percentile rank of all responses. Interestingly, decanal, which represented only 1% of the total amount of odors emitted by cotton-fed hosts, elicited the highest (0.82 mV) EAG response in parasitoids. On the other hand, (E)-β-caryophyllene, the most abundant (29%) blend component, elicited a relatively low (0.17 mV) EAG response. The results suggest that EAG response to host-related volatiles in parasitoids is probably more influenced by the ecological relevance or functional role of the compound in the blend, rather than its relative abundance.

Keywords

Braconidae, endoparasitoid, Heliothis virescens, cotton plant

Revised Amendments from Version 1

General comment: We thank all the referees for the important comments they provided while reviewing this manuscript. In several instances, we made appropriate changes to the new version according to the suggestions of the referees. In a few other areas, we have avoided the inclusion of information that is beyond the scope of the study so as to keep the article focused and concise. As clearly stated, the present study builds on the results of a previous study by the authors.

Introduction: We added a few sentences to better introduce the concept of plant-associated odors emitted by cotton-fed larvae. We clarified that odors emitted from plants play a key role in the location of host patch by parasitoids, and that odors emitted by plant-fed herbivores may be more useful in short-range host location. Finally, we added some more details about the results of the previous study conducted by the authors to create a better background for the present study.

Materials and methods: We have included justification for the mass/volume concentration used to formulate the synthetic compounds and the single dose used in EAG recordings. Furthermore, we clarified the arrangement used to present compounds to each insect replicate. We also clarified that parasitoids used in EAG recordings were reared on host larvae that fed on artificial diet so that their sensitivity to plant odors will not be biased.

Results: EAG response to solvent control was not shown because the data represent absolute EAG, in which the response to control has been deducted from responses to treatment compounds. The dataset is available for review.

Discussion: The suggested citation by one of the referees has been added to the discussion. Also, we added a statement to note that parasitoids can learn to respond to diverse odor cues.

To read any peer review reports and author responses for this article, follow the "read" links in the Open Peer Review table.

Introduction

Infested plants emit volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as an indirect defense against herbivore damage1,2. Informative volatile cues used by parasitoids for host location can be emitted by plants infested with herbivores1,2 or emitted by herbivores that fed on plants3,4. Although plant volatiles may initially lead parasitoids to the host patch, herbivore host-specific odors are important short-range cues used in the later stages of host location5. The specific mechanism by which plant-fed host larvae emit these volatiles is not fully understood. However, it is evident that parasitoids use these plant-associated VOCs in the host location process5. Such odor cues are usually released as a blend of various compounds in nature. Consequently, differentiating useful cues from ecologically irrelevant odors can be challenging for foraging parasitoids. Therefore, it is expected that antennal sensitivity of parasitoids will vary in response to different compounds. Antenna sensitivity in insects can be measured with electroantennogram (EAG) recording. EAG measures the summed activity of olfactory receptor neurons in the antenna and indicates the level of biological activity elicited by various compounds.

Microplitis croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) is an endoparasitoid of Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), which is an important pest of cotton plant. In a previous related study5, female M. croceipes showed attraction to the odor blend emitted by cotton-fed H. virescens larvae in Y-tube olfactometer bioassays5. The blend components were identified and quantified using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Furthermore, the compounds in the attractive blend occurred in varying proportions (Table 1). However, the relative abundance of a blend component does not necessarily indicate its relevance to resource location in insects6. In the present study, olfactory response of M. croceipes to synthetic versions of 15 previously identified compounds was tested in EAG bioassays. Comparing EAG results in the present study and GC/MS analyses in a previous study5, we indicated the discrepancy between relative abundance of a volatile blend component and the level of antennal response in parasitoids.

Table 1. Composition of headspace volatile organic compounds emitted by cotton-fed Heliothis virescens larvae.

This table was modified from Morawo and Fadamiro (doi: 10.1007/s10886-016-0779-7)5, with permission from the authors.

ID1 CompoundRelative
abundance (%)
Chemical
category
1α-Pinene15.1Monoterpene
2β-Pinene1.6Monoterpene
31-Octen-3-ol1.4Alcohol
43-Octanone0.8Ketone
5Myrcene2.7Monoterpene
6Unknown21.2-
7Limonene9.1Monoterpene
82-Ethylhexanol2.2Alcohol
9Decanal1.0Aldehyde
10Tridecane6.2Alkane
11Tetradecane2.4Alkane
12(E)-β-Caryophyllene29.2Sesquiterpene
13α-Bergamotene20.7Sesquiterpene
14α-Humulene6.5Sesquiterpene
15α-Farnesene0.8Sesquiterpene
16Bisabolene8.6Sesquiterpene
17α-Bisabolol7.9Sesquiterpene

1In order of elution during gas chromatography.

2Compounds that were not tested in the present study.

Methods and materials

Insects

Microplitis croceipes was reared on 2nd–3rd instar larvae of Heliothis virescens. The larvae of H. virescens used to rear M. croceipes were fed pinto bean artificial diet. Thus, parasitoids had no experience with plant odors. Adult wasps were supplied with 10% sugar water upon emergence in our laboratory at Entomology & Plant Pathology Department, Auburn University. For more details about rearing protocol, see Lewis and Burton7. Female parasitoids used for EAG bioassays were 2–3 days-old, presumed mated (after at least 24 h of interaction with males), and inexperienced with oviposition or plant material. The general rearing conditions for all insects were 25±1 °C, 75±5 % relative humidity and 14:10 h (light:dark) photoperiod.

EAG recording

EAG responses of M. croceipes to 15 synthetic compounds (Table 1), previously identified in the headspace of cotton-fed H. virescens larvae5, were recorded according to the method described by Ngumbi et al.8 with modifications. Two compounds, α-bergamotene (not commercially available) and an unidentified compound reported in the previous study5 were not tested in the present study. α-Pinene, β-pinene, myrcene, limonene, 2-ethylhexanol, tridecane, (E)-β-caryophyllene, α-humulene, α-farnesene and α-bisabolol with purity 95–99% were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich® (St. Louis, MO, USA). 1-Octen-3-ol, 3-octanone, decanal, tetradecane and bisabolene with purity 96–99% were purchased from Alfa Aesar® (Ward Hill, MA, USA). Test compounds were formulated in hexane at 0.1 μg/μl and delivered onto Whatman®No.1 filter paper strips at an optimum dose of 1 µg. Mass/volume concentration was used to correct for differences in purity of synthetic compounds. The dose was selected as ecologically relevant based on GC/MS analyses results of total amount of volatiles emitted by cotton-fed H. virescens larvae5. Impregnated filter papers were placed inside glass Pasteur pipettes and stimulus was introduced as 0.2 s odor puffs. A glass capillary reference electrode filled with 0.1 M KCl was attached to the back of the wasp head, and a similar recording electrode was connected to the excised tip of the wasp antenna. The analog signal was detected through a probe and processed with a data acquisition controller (IDAC-4, Syntech, The Netherlands). Data was assessed using EAG 2000 software (Syntech, The Netherlands). EAG responses to the 15 compounds and control (hexane) were sequentially recorded for each of 15 insect replicates. Each compound was presented at positions 1 through 15 across replicates to minimize positional bias. For instance, 1-octen-3-ol and 3-octanone were introduced to the first insect as the 3rd and 4th compounds, respectively, but introduced to the second insect as the 4th and 5th compounds, respectively.

Data analyses

Differences in absolute EAG values (EAG response to compound minus response to solvent control) of synthetic compounds were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Sidak’s multiple comparison test. The relationship between EAG response and relative abundance was analyzed with Proc Corr (correlation) procedure in SAS. All analyses were performed in SAS v9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) with P=0.05 level of significance.

Results

Female M. croceipes showed varying EAG responses to test compounds (range: 0.05–0.82 mV; Figure 1). Decanal elicited the highest EAG response (0.82 mV; χ2 = 134.13; df = 14; P<0.0001), while β-pinene elicited the lowest response (0.05 mV) in parasitoids. Decanal, tridecane, 3-octanone, 2-ethylhexanol, 1-octen-3-ol, bisabolene, tetradecane and α-farnesene elicited EAG responses ≥0.22 mV (50th percentile rank). Four of the top bioactive compounds: decanal, 3-octanone, 1-octen-3-ol and 2-ethylhexanol were emitted in quantities ≤2.2% of the total blend (Table 1). On the other hand, (E)-β-caryophyllene, the most abundant (29.2% of total blend) component, elicited a relatively low EAG response (0.17 mV) in parasitoids (Figure 1). However, the negative correlation between EAG response and relative abundance of compounds was not statistically significant (r = -0.33; N = 15; P=0.23).

3d774891-2132-4ad4-a2c6-24ddfb18ddfe_figure1.gif

Figure 1. EAG responses of Microplitis croceipes to synthetic compounds.

Mean absolute Electroantennogram (EAG) responses (mV ± SEM; N = 15) of female Microplitis croceipes to 15 volatile compounds identified in the headspace of cotton-fed Heliothis virescens larvae5. Synthetic compounds were formulated in hexane (solvent control) and tested at an optimum dose of 1 μg. Orange line indicates the arbitrary response threshold of 0.22 mV (50th percentile rank). Bars with no letters in common are significantly different (P<0.05; Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Sidak’s multiple comparison test).

Compounds testedEAG response (mV)
Rep 1Rep 2Rep 3Rep 4Rep 5Rep 6Rep 7Rep 8Rep 9Rep 10Rep 11Rep 12Rep 13Rep 14Rep 15
Hexane (control 1)0.0720.1650.0560.1780.0930.1570.0810.0530.0990.0960.050.260.1560.0630.118
Alpha-Pinene0.2240.1290.1810.1510.2150.0750.1810.2550.1080.1020.1330.2290.1180.1180.202
Beta-Pinene 0.130.2350.0960.0720.1510.0350.1690.1540.0470.0870.0620.3290.1180.0780.158
1-Octen-3-ol0.4860.4720.4130.2580.7610.1810.6720.6940.1690.1910.2550.4370.3570.2660.368
3-Octanone 0.5020.4840.4960.4960.5140.1660.6760.7610.1690.1880.2280.5660.4690.220.498
Myrcene 0.230.2830.1660.3250.2090.0690.3130.310.0470.1230.10.2040.1810.0890.138
Limonene 0.1360.150.0660.2240.3550.1690.1480.3220.0350.0660.1270.0970.1520.0970.339
2-Ethylhexanol0.3890.6210.4160.7880.7520.6330.3550.5080.1450.0410.1780.4410.4320.2170.403
Decanal 1.1880.8681.0571.1821.6670.9961.1971.2760.3370.8070.4550.5990.7740.3550.736
Tridecane 0.4250.5190.4590.4650.5470.450.5140.6570.7610.1840.2280.5420.4180.2130.418
Tetradecane 0.2120.4050.3550.4280.5290.2880.4010.520.5660.2760.1330.2750.3680.1490.382
(E)-Beta-Caryophyllene 0.2030.1550.3060.2880.4650.230.3950.3770.2420.120.1550.3180.2140.0690.235
Alpha-Humulene 0.120.1530.2030.1840.3160.1230.2270.3770.1630.1330.0950.2280.1910.0520.339
Alpha-Farnesene0.1910.2080.2640.3310.5020.2060.4130.5990.2730.1660.2480.3390.3160.0860.359
Bisabolene0.20.2660.4220.2520.3740.2390.4530.6020.2970.3130.2490.620.3190.2890.556
Alpha-Bisabolol0.0660.1180.1480.1140.2670.0620.1780.30.0660.0840.0720.1270.10.1030.219
Hexane (control 2)0.0170.0590.0840.0660.0810.0120.0960.0990.0290.0230.0310.0970.030.0210.083
Correlation data
CompoundRel. Amt (%)Absolute EAG (mV)
Alpha-Pinene15.10.077866667
Beta-Pinene 1.60.051666667
1-Octen-3-ol1.40.3145
3-Octanone 0.80.3447
Myrcene 2.70.1038
Limonene 9.10.089
2-Ethylhexanol2.20.338333333
Decanal 10.815433333
Tridecane 6.20.369166667
Tetradecane 2.40.2683
(E)-Beta-Caryophyllene 29.20.1673
Alpha-Humulene 6.50.109433333
Alpha-Farnesene0.80.2159
Bisabolene8.60.279233333
Dataset 1.EAG responses of Microplitis croceipes to synthetic compounds and correlation with relative abundance of compounds.

Discussion

EAG responses of Micropiltis croceipes in the present study indicated variation in biological activity elicited by test compounds at the peripheral level, and revealed a discrepancy between relative abundance and level of antennal responses in parasitoids. High EAG response elicited by decanal in M. croceipes agrees with previous reports on olfactory responses of the parasitoids, Microplitis mediator9 and Bracon hebetor10. Furthermore, decanal is a key attractant for host-seeking M. croceipes5. Although compounds are emitted in different quantities in natural blends, minor components can have a profound effect on resource location in parasitoids6,11. Interestingly, decanal constituted only 1% of the total blend emitted by cotton-fed H. virescens5, but elicited the highest EAG response in M. croceipes, supporting the “little peaks-big effects” concept6. On the other hand, (E)-β-caryophyllene, the most abundant blend component, elicited a relatively low EAG response in parasitoids.

Therefore, it is more likely that the ecological relevance of a compound, rather than its relative abundance determines the level of olfactory response in foraging insects. For instance, small amounts of isothiocyanates in the volatile blend of brassica plants serve as host location cues for parasitoids of brassica herbivores12,13. More importantly, blend components act in concert to provide parasitoids with complete information14. Consequently, certain compounds function as background odors to enhance detectability (olfactory contrast) of other attractive components in a blend12,15. It is possible that (E)-β-caryophyllene serves as a background odor in the blend emitted by cotton-fed H. virescens. Finally, it should be noted that while EAG measures the level of bioactivity, behavioral bioassays are usually needed to establish the functional role of various compounds5,16. In addition, several species of parasitoids can be conditioned to respond to diverse odor cues, regardless of the relevance of such odor cues to their ecology.

Data availability

Dataset 1. EAG responses of Microplitis croceipes to synthetic compounds and correlation with relative abundance of compounds. Electroantennogram (EAG) data shows actual EAG response readouts to different compounds for 15 insect replicates. Absolute EAG value for each compound in a replicate can be obtained by deducting the average of two controls (Control 1 and Control 2) from the actual EAG values. Correlation data shows relative abundance of 15 blend components and their corresponding mean absolute EAG values. Details of data analyses were indicated in the main text and Figure 1 legend. Raw data behind the representation shown in Figure 1 and analyses referred to in the Results section are included. DOI: 10.5256/f1000research.10104.d14344617.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 21 Nov 2016
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Morawo T, Burrows M and Fadamiro H. Electroantennogram response of the parasitoid, Microplitis croceipes to host-related odors: The discrepancy between relative abundance and level of antennal responses to volatile compound [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 5:2725 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10104.2)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 2
VERSION 2
PUBLISHED 09 Mar 2017
Revised
Views
8
Cite
Reviewer Report 11 Apr 2017
Torsten Meiners, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants Ecological Chemistry, Plant Analysis and Stored Product Protection, Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI), Berlin, Germany 
Approved
VIEWS 8
The authors provided more information on a previous study and on the methods in ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Meiners T. Reviewer Report For: Electroantennogram response of the parasitoid, Microplitis croceipes to host-related odors: The discrepancy between relative abundance and level of antennal responses to volatile compound [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 5:2725 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.11957.r20837)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 21 Nov 2016
Views
12
Cite
Reviewer Report 13 Feb 2017
Feng Liu, Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA 
Approved
VIEWS 12
General comments

This study investigated the EAG response of a parasitoid Microplitis croceipes to the volatiles emitted from its host, the cotton plant-fed Heliothis virescens larvae. 15 compounds were tested at the dose of 1 μg on the female ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Liu F. Reviewer Report For: Electroantennogram response of the parasitoid, Microplitis croceipes to host-related odors: The discrepancy between relative abundance and level of antennal responses to volatile compound [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 5:2725 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.10885.r19829)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
16
Cite
Reviewer Report 10 Feb 2017
Torsten Meiners, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants Ecological Chemistry, Plant Analysis and Stored Product Protection, Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI), Berlin, Germany 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 16
The research note of Tolulope et al. reports EAG responses of the parasitic wasp Microplitis croceipes and relates the antennal responses to the relative abundance of the compounds in the odour bouquet of the larvae.

When looking ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Meiners T. Reviewer Report For: Electroantennogram response of the parasitoid, Microplitis croceipes to host-related odors: The discrepancy between relative abundance and level of antennal responses to volatile compound [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 5:2725 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.10885.r19230)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
15
Cite
Reviewer Report 06 Feb 2017
Yonggen Lou, National Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, Institute of Insect Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China 
Approved
VIEWS 15
The manuscript reported the the relationship between the relative abundance of volatile chemical emitted from Heliothis virescens larvae and the antennal response by the larval parasitoid of the herbivore, Microplitis croceipes. By electroantennogram bioassays, the authors found that the level ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Lou Y. Reviewer Report For: Electroantennogram response of the parasitoid, Microplitis croceipes to host-related odors: The discrepancy between relative abundance and level of antennal responses to volatile compound [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 5:2725 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.10885.r19925)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
19
Cite
Reviewer Report 16 Jan 2017
Amanuel Tamiru, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology (MPICE), Nairobi, Kenya 
Approved
VIEWS 19
General comments:

This study examined the relationship between the relative abundance of a volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted by Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and level of antennal response by the larval parasitoid, Microplitis croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). The ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Tamiru A. Reviewer Report For: Electroantennogram response of the parasitoid, Microplitis croceipes to host-related odors: The discrepancy between relative abundance and level of antennal responses to volatile compound [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 5:2725 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.10885.r19376)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 21 Nov 2016
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.