ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Review

Rare fungal infectious agents: a lurking enemy

[version 1; peer review: 4 approved]
PUBLISHED 31 Oct 2017
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

In the expanding population of immunocompromised patients and those treated in intensive care units, rare fungal infectious agents have emerged as important pathogens, causing invasive infections associated with high morbidity and mortality. These infections may present either as de novo or as breakthrough invasive infections in high-risk patients with hematologic malignancies receiving prophylactic or empirical antifungal therapy or in patients with central venous catheters. Diagnosis and treatment are challenging. Physicians should have a high index of suspicion because early diagnosis is of paramount importance. Conventional diagnostic methods such as cultures and histopathology are still essential, but rapid and more specific molecular techniques for both detection and identification of the infecting pathogens are being developed and hopefully will lead to early targeted treatment. The management of invasive fungal infections is multimodal. Reversal of risk factors, if feasible, should be attempted. Surgical debridement is recommended in localized mold infections. The efficacy of various antifungal drugs is not uniform. Amphotericin B is active against most yeasts, except Trichosporon, as well as against Mucorales, Fusarium, and some species of Paecilomyces and dimorphic fungi. The use of voriconazole is suggested for the treatment of trichosporonosis and scedosporiosis. Combination treatment, though recommended as salvage therapy in some infections, is controversial in most cases. Despite the use of available antifungals, mortality remains high. The optimization of molecular-based techniques, with expansion of reference libraries and the possibility for direct detection of resistance mechanisms, is awaited with great interest in the near future. Further research is necessary, however, in order to find the best ways to confront and destroy these lurking enemies.

Keywords

invasive fungal infections, rare, yeast, mold, mucormycosis, trichosporon,

Introduction

The quest for the early diagnosis and effective treatment of invasive fungal infections is ongoing, and there are still many obstacles to overcome. The main agents responsible for these infections are members of the genera Candida, Cryptococcus, and Aspergillus. However, there are other fungi, yeasts, and molds, which, though rare in human disease, can cause equally serious and life-threatening infections in immunocompromised and other susceptible hosts. These include yeasts (Trichosporon, Magnusiomyces, Saprochaete, Rhodotorula, Saccharomyces, and Malassezia), mucormycetes, hyaline molds, dematiaceous (melanized) molds, and some novel taxa of thermally dimorphic fungi. Furthermore, a new Candida species, C. auris, has emerged and may pose a threat to hospitalized patients. The aim of this review is to present an update on invasive infections due to these rare and emerging fungi, focusing on new developments in diagnostic methodologies and therapeutic modules. In the light of recent taxonomic research and nomenclature changes of many pathogens, this review, though clinically oriented, will inevitably refer to some of these recent advances.

Rare yeasts

Infections due to yeasts other than Candida and Cryptococcus account for about 2 to 3% of all fungemias13. They mainly occur in patients with hematologic malignancies or the critically ill. A large proportion of these infections represent breakthrough fungemias in patients already receiving an antifungal agent or are associated with central venous catheters (CVCs). Some of these yeasts are colonizers of the skin or the mucosal surfaces, whereas others may be found in the environment or even in food. The clinical presentation is non-specific, the only characteristic being that cutaneous exanthems are more common than in candidemia4. Diagnosis is based on blood cultures.

Candida auris 

C. auris is an emerging, multiple-drug-resistant (MDR) yeast causing a broad range of healthcare-associated invasive infections. It was first reported in Japan in 2009 when an isolate was recovered from the external ear canal of an inpatient4. The first bloodstream infections were reported two years later from South Korea5; shortly after that, C. auris fungemia was documented in India68, South Africa9, and Kuwait10. Since then, this difficult-to-treat yeast has been spreading across several countries in Europe, Asia, and the Americas1115. In a recent study from India, C. auris accounted for more than 5% of candidemia in a national survey of intensive care units (ICUs)7. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) and epidemiological analyses, performed by Lockhart et al., led to the conclusion that this species has emerged recently, independently, and almost simultaneously on three continents and not as a result of worldwide dissemination of a dominant clone12. The earliest case to date was identified in retrospect by DNA sequencing of a Korean bloodstream isolate from 19965.

Most cases of fungemia due to C. auris have been reported from hospitalized patients. Patients range from neonates to the elderly and have the well-known risk factors for invasive candidiasis. Like other Candida spp., C. auris colonizes the skin and mucosal surfaces (that is, genitourinary, gastrointestinal, and respiratory tract). In addition, environmental sampling of the clinical area surrounding colonized patients demonstrated contamination of the floor around bed sites, radiators, equipment monitors, mattresses, beds, windowsills, chairs, infusion pumps, and countertops16,17.

The phylogeny of C. auris is similar to that of C. haemulonii, which is another species resistant to amphotericin B and fluconazole5. WGS data also revealed a relationship to C. lusitaniae, which is intrinsically resistant to many antifungals18,19. Commercial identification systems, such as Vitek 2 and API20C-AUX, misidentify this yeast as C. haemulonii, C. famata, C. sake, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Rhodotorula glutinis and this misidentification is primarily due to a lack of C. auris in the database of these systems5,6,9. The most reliable methods for diagnosis of C. auris are molecular-based ones, such as amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) fingerprinting and sequencing analysis20,21. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) systems (Bruker and Vitek MALDI-TOF MS) also have the potential for an accurate identification given the incorporation of a library containing C. auris and a proper extraction method21. In a recently published study, where the isolates from 54 patients were analyzed, 93% were found to be resistant to fluconazole, 35% to amphotericin B, and 7% to echinocandins, while 41% were resistant to two antifungal classes and 4% were resistant to three classes12. Voriconazole minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were elevated in 50% of isolates in two large series from India and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)12,20. Posaconazole and isavuconazole show excellent in vitro activity against C. auris9,12,14. Currently, the drugs of choice for treating fungemia due to C. auris are the echinocandins provided that susceptibility testing has been performed22. A new drug, SCY-078, which is an orally bioavailable 1,3-β-D-glucan synthesis inhibitor, exhibits potent activity against C. auris isolates and may prove to be an important antifungal in the treatment of MDR species23.

The overall crude in-hospital mortality rate of C. auris fungemia ranges from 30 to 60%16,24. The rapid emergence of C. auris has prompted the CDC in the USA, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, and other institutions to publish alerts and recommendations regarding the control of this notorious fungus25,26.

Trichosporon 

Trichosporon species are basidiomycetous yeast-like fungi, are found in soil and freshwater, are part of the human mycobiome, and colonize the skin, the peri-genital areas, and the gastrointestinal tract. Invasive trichosporonosis has been described in patients with leukemia, burns, and AIDS, in patients receiving corticosteroids, and in patients who have undergone heart valve or ophthalmic surgery2731. Trichosporon spp. cause a wide spectrum of infections, ranging from white piedra and hypersensitivity pneumonia in immunocompetent patients to fungemia, endocarditis, peritonitis, and meningitis in patients with hematologic malignancies27,3134. The species most commonly found in fungemias are T. asahii (75%), T. mucoides (7%), T. inkin (5%), and T. asteroides (5%)28, but at least 15 other species have been identified from clinical samples29. Microscopic characteristics are pseudohyphae and septate hyphae along with arthroconidia and blastoconidia.

Diagnosis is made by blood cultures. Species identification relies either on phenotypic methods or on molecular analysis targeting the ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region35. The rapid MALDI-TOF MS methodology is being increasingly applied and appears to be a promising tool. Molecular methods have also been developed for the detection of Trichosporon spp. in blood and tissues, even in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue36, but no standardized method exists yet. Cross-reactions with the serum Cryptococcus glucuronoxylomannan antigen as well as the Aspergillus galactomannan antigen (GM) have been reported in several cases of Trichosporon fungemia3739, and dual positivity may be suggestive for Trichosporon infection. Serum β-D-glucan is often detected, but sensitivity is low39.

The preferred antifungal for treating trichosporonosis is voriconazole40. Posaconazole and other triazoles are also active, and fluconazole shows variable potency4042. Amphotericin B, the echinocandins, and flucytosine are not indicated for treating trichosporonosis. The mortality of disseminated infection remains high (rates of 42 to 77%27,32,43).

Magnusiomyces and Saprochaete 

Magnusiomyces capitatus (formerly Geotrichum capitatum, Blastoschizomyces capitatus, or Saprochaete capitata) and Saprochaete clavata (formerly known as Geotrichum clavatum) are human pathogens that are closely related and are frequently mistaken for each other44. The taxonomy of Geotrichum was revised relatively recently45, but many authors use the older names. With the use of ITS sequencing, isolates are identified as S. clavata, M. capitatus, or Geotrichum candidum44. These fungi are ascomycetous yeasts found in soil, water, plants, poultry feces, and dairy products4648. They may colonize the human skin and mucosae and can cause infections clinically similar to candidiasis. Reports of infections due to M. capitatus originate mainly from Europe, mostly from the Mediterranean area43,49,50, but there have also been publications from Asia51. The majority of cases are seen in patients with underlying hematologic malignancies43,49,52. Nosocomial outbreaks have been reported49,53. Fungemias due to S. clavata are very rare, but a multicenter outbreak was identified by WGS in France54. In patients with neutropenia, the disease is disseminated, often presenting with fever and cutaneous lesions. Several organs, including the lung, liver, spleen, bone, kidneys, brain, and endocardium, may be involved50. Keratitis55, meningitis, and osteomyelitis56 may also occur.

Diagnosis is based on blood cultures. Molecular methods are necessary in order make a correct identification44. Patients with invasive infection may have a positive GM test, but it is uncertain whether this can be used as a diagnostic tool because invasive aspergillosis may coexist with infection due to Magnusiomyces or Saprochaete57,58.

The preferred agent for the treatment of invasive infections is amphotericin B with or without concomitant flucytosine40. Voriconazole is active in vitro, and there are case reports where it has been used successfully46,59. Mortality of disseminated infection is high, ranging from 50 to 75%43,47,60.

Rhodotorula 

Rhodotorula spp. are basidiomycetous yeasts, which are widespread in nature. They are found in air, soil, lakes, seawater, foods, and beverages61. They have also been isolated from medical equipment, such as bronchoscopes, and from shower curtains, bathtubs, and toothbrushes62. The fungus may colonize the skin, nails, and the respiratory, gastrointestinal, and genital tract of humans63.

The culture of Rhodotorula spp. produces distinctive orange to salmon-colored mucoid colonies. The most common species, which may cause invasive infections in humans, are R. mucilaginosa (rubra), R. glutinis, and R. minuta. Infections occur mainly in patients with hematologic or other malignancies and in the majority present as fungemia, which is almost always catheter-related6368. Other reported infections include endocarditis64,69,70, peritonitis (associated with ambulatory peritoneal dialysis)71, meningitis72, and endophthalmitis67,73 and occur in patients with AIDS, extensive burns, or cirrhosis, in those who have undergone intra-abdominal surgery, and in critically ill patients in the ICU74,75.

Rhodotorula spp. are resistant in vitro to echinocandins and azoles76,77, and there are several cases where fungemia with Rhodotorula emerged in patients receiving prophylaxis with these agents66,78. The recommended treatment is amphotericin B with or without flucytosine40. CVCs should be removed. Mortality is estimated to be 12 to 20%63,64.

Saccharomyces 

Saccharomyces cerevisiae (also known as “baker’s yeast”) is a ubiquitous ascomycetous yeast found in soil, plants, and fruit79. S. boulardii is a strain of S. cerevisiae with some specific genome features80,81 and is found in some probiotic preparations82,83 used in the prevention and treatment of various diarrheal diseases84. Saccharomyces has been isolated from the throat, stool, urine, and perineum of patients with hematologic malignancies85. It is an emerging cause of invasive fungal infections, either in patients receiving probiotics82,83,86,87 or in those with underlying diseases, such as leukemia79. There have been reports of nosocomial outbreaks88,89, some of them attributed to central catheters or hand transmission88,90, but the largest proportion of these fungemias is associated with probiotics79. The clinical presentation is the same as that of candidemia. Diagnosis is made by culture and conventional identification methods40. In the search for early diagnostic markers, β-D-glucan has been considered and has been found in the plasma of patients and in culture supernatant91,92, but no clinical data are available to prove its usefulness. A novel multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for the detection and differentiation of fungal pathogens in clinical specimens of hematological patients, including Saccharomyces spp., has been developed and seems promising, but validation is still required93. Amphotericin B has the lowest MICs for Saccharomyces and is considered the drug of choice for its treatment40. There have been reports of successful treatment with echinocandins94,95. Fluconazole is often inactive. Probiotics should be discontinued and CVCs removed40. Mortality of S. cerevisiae fungemia was 29.5% in one study but, in most cases, could not be attributed only to fungemia87.

Malassezia 

Malassezia is a genus of basidiomycetous yeasts comprising the lipid-dependent Malassezia furfur and the lipid-independent species Malassezia pachydermatis, which are part of the normal skin microbiota96. They can cause skin infections (for example, pityriasis versicolor) as well as systemic infections in neonates receiving lipid-containing parenteral nutrition and in children and adults with hematologic malignancies, cancer, Crohn’s disease, and chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis97. There are multiple reports of outbreaks in neonatal ICUs98100. The clinical signs and symptoms of Malassezia fungemia are non-specific, consisting mainly of fever. Dissemination to the heart, lungs, and other organs may occur101. Diagnosis is made by culture but is difficult because routinely used media do not support the growth of this fungus, which requires lipids101. The recommended treatment for severe cases is amphotericin B and for non-severe cases fluconazole, although M. pachydermatis may be less susceptible in vitro40,97,101. The mortality of invasive Malassezia infections is unknown, but it seems that, with appropriate management, the attributable mortality is low101.

Rare molds

Mucormycetes

Mucormycosis is the third most common cause of invasive fungal infection (after candidiasis and aspergillosis). The agents of mucormycosis are ubiquitous in nature and are found mainly in decaying organic matter. They belong to the order Mucorales and include the genera Rhizopus, Rhizomucor, Mucor, Lichtheimia, Apophysomyces, Cunninghamella, Saksenaea, Cokeromyces, Actinomucor, and Syncephalastrum102. Some of these genera, such as Saksenaea and Apophysomyces, are more common in certain geographic areas103105. The major risk factors for mucormycosis are uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, hematologic malignancies, organ or bone marrow transplantation, neutropenia, treatment with corticosteroids, trauma and burns, and deferoxamine (an iron/aluminium chelator) therapy106. Iron acquisition is a critical step in the pathogenetic mechanism of mucormycosis, and deferoxamine has been shown to act as a siderophore for Mucorales106.

Mucorales cause a diverse and devastating spectrum of infections. Rhinocerebral, pulmonary soft tissue, and disseminated disease are the most common clinical presentations, but virtually any organ can be affected107,108. The fungi invade the arteries, leading to extensive vessel thrombosis and subsequent infarction106. Although tissue necrosis is the hallmark of mucormycosis, a presentation and syndrome-oriented approach to diagnosis lacks sensitivity and specificity. Other fungi, such as Aspergillus or Fusarium, may produce the same clinical signs. Nevertheless, there are some features which should lead to a higher index of suspicion for invasive pulmonary mucormycosis109. These include prior prophylaxis with voriconazole or emergence of breakthrough fungal infection in an immunocompromised patient receiving agents active against Aspergillus but not Mucorales. Radiologically, multiple (at least 10) nodules and pleural effusion are more common in mucormycosis. The presence of reverse halo sign on computed tomography is a strong indicator of lung mucormycosis and may appear earlier than other radiologic findings110112.

The diagnosis is traditionally based on direct microscopic examination, histopathology, and culture. Mucorales produce rapidly growing white to gray fluffy colonies with broad hyphae microscopically and a variety of species-specific structures such as stolons, rhizoids, sporangia, apophyses, sporangiophores, columellae, and sporangiospores. The hyphae are large, ribbon-like, irregular pauciseptate or aseptate in contrast with those seen in aspergillosis, which are more regular and septate. However, mucormycosis can be either overdiagnosed or missed by histopathology. In a study of 58 culture-proven mold infections from four tertiary centers using a blinded assessment, Aspergillus spp. infections were misidentified as mucormycosis in 11% of the cases113. In another study, 2 out of 58 cases diagnosed as aspergillosis on histopathology or cytology or both were proven to be mucormycosis by culture114. Furthermore, 30 to 50% of histopathology-proven cases may have negative cultures115,116.

Studies have shown that molecular identification of mucormycosis is accurate, using the ITS region of the ribosomal DNA as a first-line sequencing target for the identification of Zygomycete organisms in pure culture117. When no culture is available, PCR assays on fresh or FFPE tissues can identify and discriminate between agents of aspergillosis and mucormycosis118123. These techniques are not yet standardized but provide a promising tool for the identification of fungal agents. Detection of circulating Mucorales DNA in serum using real-time PCR is another field of current research and may aid in the earlier diagnosis of the disease124,125.

Early diagnosis of mucormycosis is crucial, and prompt therapeutic intervention may prevent progressive tissue invasion and its sequelae109,126. Therefore, it is very important to use all available diagnostic methods in order to achieve the best possible outcome. Treatment is multimodal, including antifungal agents, surgical debridement, and reversal of underlying risk factors127,128. Mucorales are resistant to most antifungals in vitro. Amphotericin B is the most active drug, except for Cunninghamella and Apophysomyces isolates129,130. Posaconazole and isavuconazole are also active, while itraconazole and terbinafine show some activity against certain strains. There seems to be some correlation between the degree of susceptibility of Mucorales isolates to amphotericin B and outcomes. In a small study by Lamoth et al., an MIC of not more than 0.5 μg/mL was significantly associated with better 6-week outcomes131. Liposomal amphotericin B is the drug of choice for first-line treatment. Posaconazole is recommended for salvage or maintenance therapy. Isavuconazole has recently been approved for the treatment of mucormycosis, but its role as first-line treatment has not yet been defined132.

Even with aggressive therapy, the mortality of mucormycosis remains high. For this reason, there is interest in the use of combination treatment or adjunctive modalities. In a recent study, which evaluated the impact of monotherapy versus combination therapy in a group of 106 patients with hematologic malignancies and which used a propensity score analysis, there was no improved outcome for the group receiving combination treatment133. Combination of amphotericin B with deferasirox, an iron chelator which does not act as a siderophore for Mucorales, was associated with poorer outcomes in a small prospective study in patients with hematologic malignancies134. However, based on preclinical data, there might be a role for this approach in patients with other underlying diseases135. Other adjunctive treatments used in the attempt to enhance the outcome of this devastating disease include cytokines and hyperbaric oxygen. Some authors published case reports of successive treatment of mucormycosis with the use of hyperbaric oxygen in combination with antifungal treatment136. There are also some data showing that granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factors or interferon-gamma or both may enhance the immune response against certain Mucorales137. However, since the data are only in vitro or pre-clinical, these therapies must be used cautiously.

Hyaline molds

Fusarium. Fusarium species are widely distributed in nature, occurring in ecosystems all around the globe. They are known important plant pathogens138 and constitute a large genus with a complex and evolving taxonomy. However, only a few species complexes (SCs), currently 10, are involved in human disease; the most frequent are Fusarium solani, F. oxysporum, F. incarnatum-equiseti, F. fujikuroi (including the species F. verticillioides, F. proliferatum, and F. sacchari), F. clamydosporum, and F. dimerum139,140. Depending on the immune status of the host and the portal of entry, they cause a broad spectrum of infections, including superficial, locally invasive, and disseminated infection, and have considerable morbidity and high mortality rates141. Some species produce mycotoxins and have a significant impact on animal and human health138.

In immunocompetent hosts, Fusarium species, along with Candida and Aspergillus, are considered a leading cause of keratitis. Risk factors include accidental trauma, long-term use of topical corticosteroids and antibiotics, diabetes, pre-existing eye infections, eye surgery142,143, and (since the 1980s) contact lens use, with increasing frequency144, especially in more developed countries145148. Fusarium keratitis progresses slowly and can cause devastating ocular damage after the formation of penetrating ulcer and endophthalmitis. Therapy consists of topical antifungals, sometimes in combination with subconjunctival injections, but therapeutic keratoplasty may be needed in difficult cases. In many cases, the outcome is poor, especially in delayed diagnosis, and is more favorable in contact lens wearers149.

Other forms of fusariosis, including the most prevalent ones in otherwise healthy individuals, are onychomycosis and skin infections, peritonitis following continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, catheter-associated fungemia, and, less frequently, pneumonia, osteomyelitis, arthritis, otitis, sinusitis, and brain abscess, usually after trauma150.

In the immunocompromised hosts, those mostly at risk have acute myeloid and acute lymphoid leukemia, and the most important risk factors are neutropenia, lymphopenia, graft-versus-host disease, corticosteroid use, or any other immunosuppressive treatment. Infection is almost always invasive and frequently disseminated151. The most common routes of infection are direct inoculation and airborne uptake141, and the portals of entry are the paranasal sinuses, the lungs, and skin lesions such as interdigital intertrigo, abnormal appearing nails, and paronychia152,153. Disseminated fusariosis is hardly distinguishable from aspergillosis both clinically and histologically, but agents of fusariosis, unlike those of aspergillosis and mucormycosis, can be isolated from blood cultures. It typically presents with fever in severely neutropenic patients and with myalgia and sudden appearance of erythematous, papular, or painful nodular skin lesions which evolve rapidly to central necrosis. The lungs and sinuses can also be affected, and pneumonia occurs in almost 50% of cases154.

According to the few existing epidemiological studies, the incidence appears to be low—less than 0.3% among allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients and patients with hematologic malignancies—but variable in different geographic regions155158. The highest incidence is in Brazil: 5.2% among allogeneic HCT recipients and 3.8% in patients with acute myeloid leukemia158. Hematological patients in this region appeared to have an unusually high incidence of cutaneous portal of entry159,160. In previous studies, increased incidence of infection has been associated with hospital water distribution systems which also serve as a potential reservoir of Fusarium spp.3,161. The distribution of Fusarium species varies too in different geographic regions, but it seems that any species of Fusarium can cause any type of infection162,163.

Diagnosis is based on conventional mycological methods—direct microscopy, culture, and histopathology154—and has to be as prompt and accurate as possible. However, direct microscopy and histopathology, though highly sensitive, are not specific for Fusarium, as hyphae share the same characteristics with all hyaline molds, such as Aspergillus and Scedosporium.

Culture has low sensitivity, as it can be positive in just 60% of cases154. Identification of a Fusarium isolate to the genus level is easy because of the characteristic banana-shaped macroconidia154. However, identification to the species level requires molecular methods, preferably performed in reference laboratories140. MALDI-TOF MS appears to be a promising and more feasible approach for the identification of clinical isolates of Fusarium at the species level provided that the existing database is expanded164. For direct and rapid detection in tissues and blood, multiplex reverse transcription–PCR methods have recently been developed with promising results140,165.

Clinically important species are resistant to almost all currently used antifungals, and this poses a challenge for antifungal therapy166. The exact resistance mechanisms in Fusarium have not been elucidated yet, but combinations of CYP51A amino-acid alterations or CYP51A gene overexpression or both might be involved in azole resistance167. Amphotericin B has the lowest MICs in vitro, whereas the azoles show variable values with a large interspecies variability163. Voriconazole appears to be effective in vivo and a good alternative to amphotericin B despite higher MICs154.

Based on the available data, voriconazole or a lipid-based amphotericin B formulation is recommended as primary therapy151,154. Combination therapy is frequently used but not scientifically supported. Posaconazole is recommended as salvage therapy151,154. A thorough clinical evaluation and treatment of skin lesions, particularly onychomycosis, have been recommended for patients at high risk for invasive fusariosis, prior to or upon initiation of antineoplastic therapy154. In addition to antifungal treatment, surgical debridement of infected tissues, removal of venous catheters in confirmed catheter-related fusariosis, and reversal of the immunocompromised state should take place whenever possible for an optimal outcome151,154. Prognosis in the immunocompromised is poor and is highly dependent on the underlying condition and immune status of the patient, but survival seems to have substantially increased in the last decade168.

Scedosporium and Lomentospora. The hyaline molds known as Scedosporium and Pseudallescheria until 2014 are cosmopolitan saprophytes, commonly found in soil, polluted water, compost, and the manure of cattle and fowl151,169. They have a complex taxonomy, hence the nomenclature discrepancies with older studies170172. The most frequent clinically relevant species are Scedosporium boydii, S. apiospermum, and S. auratiacum. S. boydii and S. apiospermum are clearly distinct species but, owing to common pathology characteristics and antifungal susceptibility patterns, may be considered a complex and indicated as “S. apiospermum SC” in the routine laboratory, as proposed by de Hoog et al. in 2013173. The name “Scedosporium” has also been proposed for their teleomorphic stages (sexual forms) Pseudallescheria boydii and P. apiosperma172.

Distribution varies according to climate151. They cause highly lethal opportunistic infections in immunocompromised patients, but also a wide range of infections in immunocompetent individuals, with considerable morbidity171. They are frequently isolated from patients with cystic fibrosis, occasionally causing lung infection174,175.

Infections in the immunocompetent occur after penetrating trauma and include keratitis, endophthalmitis, otitis, sinusitis, central nervous system (CNS) infections, osteoarticular and soft tissue infections, and mycetoma176,177. Disseminated infections with S. apiospermum/Pseudallescheria and pneumonia or CNS involvement can follow near-drowning accidents in polluted water171,177185. Of note are cases of transplant recipients with previously near-drowning victims as donors186,187. In contrast, Lomentospora prolificans (formerly Scedosporium prolificans, or S. inflatum) is mainly isolated from cases with underlying immunosupression188. Infection can affect any organ, usually the skin, sinuses, lungs, and the CNS, following hematogenous dissemination, and delayed treatment of brain abscesses is associated with a high mortality rate (>75%)188. This species is also phylogenetically separated from the other Scedosporium species; therefore, the recommendation was recently made to rename it Lomentospora prolificans172 (that is, under its oldest genus name Lomentospora189).

As in fusariosis and other mold mycoses, diagnosis is based on direct microscopy, culture, and histopathology, but more sensitive and specific methods are sought for accurate and prompt diagnosis. New molecular methods have recently been developed and are promising for both direct detection and identification to the species level. In infections with L. prolificans, blood cultures may be positive in more than 50% of cases and isolates can be easily differentiated from their S. apiospermum counterparts because of their characteristic microscopic morphology with inflated phialides171.

Therapy is challenging because of a high rate of resistance to antifungals, and the therapeutic outcome is usually poor in patients with persistent immunosuppression. S. apiospermum is resistant in vitro to amphotericin B and flucytosine, and susceptibility to itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, and the echinocandins is variable. L. prolificans is highly resistant to all antifungals, and mortality rates are as high as 95% in immunocompromised patients190. Voriconazole demonstrates the strongest in vitro activity against this species191. There are suggestions of synergistic activity of voriconazole with colistin192, terbinafine193197, or caspofungin198. Combinations of azoles and terbinafine and sequential azole and terbinafine therapy also appear effective against L. prolificans199. In general, the management of both S. apiospermum SC and L. prolificans depends on the underlying condition of the host, and voriconazole has been suggested as first-line treatment200204. In the immunocompromised, therapy is multimodal, and, whenever possible, reversal of the immune suppression, along with surgical debridement of infected tissues, is recommended205,206.

Paecilomyces and Purpureocillium. Until recently, the fungal species Paecilomyces variotii and Paecilomyces lilacinus were considered to belong to the same genus, but new taxonomic studies have shown that they are not genetically related, and the latter is now assigned the name Purpureocillium lilacinum207. They are found in soil, decaying plant material208210, indoor air, and foods210.

Paecilomyces infections are associated with almost any organ or system of the human body211. The most usual infections in immunocompromised patients are cutaneous, catheter-related, and disseminated infections, pneumonia, cellulitis, fungemia, and pyelonephritis208,209,211213. The most frequent infection caused by Purpureocillium lilacinum is keratitis in otherwise healthy hosts after trauma, surgery, or prolonged contact lens use214.

Diagnosis is based on conventional mycological methods. MALDI-TOF MS analysis is a promising tool, as with all of the above-described fungi, but requires further cutoff standardization and a reliable reference library215. There is no optimal antifungal treatment established. P. lilacinum strains are highly resistant to amphotericin B but susceptible to azoles, whereas P. variotii is usually amphotericin B susceptible151.

Dematiaceous (or melanized) molds

These fungi are darkly pigmented because of the presence of melanin in the cell wall, which acts as a virulence factor216218. More than 70 genera are implicated in human disease; Alternaria, Aureobasidium, Bipolaris, Cladophialophora, Curvularia, Exophiala, Exserohilum, Hortaea werneckii, Neoscytalidium dimidiatum, Ochroconis, and Rhinocladiella are some of the most known representatives219.

Commonly found in soil and plant material, they are distributed worldwide, although some neurotropic fungi are often geographically restricted: Rhinocladiella mackenziei occur in the Middle East and Cladophialophora bantiana occur mainly in India, whereas cases of Exophiala dermatitidis are reported mainly from East Asia220. They cause phaeohyphomycosis, a term that refers to a broad range of diseases ranging from allergic sinusitis to superficial and disseminated infections, pneumonia, brain abscess220, and even iatrogenic infections, such as the 2012–2013 multistate (USA) fungal meningitis epidemic due to Exserohilum rostratum221. Infections can be life-threatening in both immunocompromised and immunocompetent individuals. Diagnosis is based on conventional mycological methods and PCR. There are no standardized therapies, but voriconazole, posaconazole, and itraconazole demonstrate the most consistent in vitro activity against this group of fungi. Voriconazole may be superior for CNS infections. Surgery is required for local infections and brain abscesses220.

Rare and emerging dimorphic fungi

Emmonsia-like fungi and Emergomyces 

The genus Emmonsia makes up part of the Ajellomycetaceae family of the Onygenales order, along with the genera Blastomyces, Histoplasma, and Paracoccidioides, among others. Until recently, two species were recognized—E. crescens and E. parva—which cause adiaspiromycosis, a granulomatous pulmonary disease of rodents and other small mammals and very rarely of humans, through conversion into large, thick-walled “adiaspores” in the infection sites222,223. However, in recent years, there has been an increase in cases of diseases caused by novel Emmonsia-like species. The increase between 2006 and 2015 was primarily driven by the recognition of HIV-associated cases in South Africa following the introduction of molecular identification protocols for dimorphic fungal infections in 2008223. These new species differ from the “classical” ones (E. crescens and E. parva) in that they are able to convert into yeast-like cells capable of replication and extra-pulmonary dissemination during the course of infection, instead of the non-replicating adiaspores223. Infection probably occurs through the inhalation of spores, but the environmental niche is as yet unknown. New taxonomic research suggests some putative virulence factors that may play a role in the infection and pathogenicity of the novel Emmonsia strains, but these findings need further investigation224. The species Emmonsia pasteuriana225227 has now been classified in a new genus of the Ajellomycetaceae family, Emergomyces (Emergomyces pasteurianus comb. nov.)228.

Clinical diagnosis of infections due to Emmonsia-like species is difficult because of the protean nature of symptoms and signs. Infections usually are disseminated involving primarily the skin and lungs and frequently are misdiagnosed as tuberculosis. Cutaneous manifestations may be misdiagnosed as varicella, Kaposi’s sarcoma, and drug reactions229. Laboratory diagnosis is made by biopsy of the skin or any other involved organ and blood culture, although histopathologic findings are not sufficient to distinguish Emmonsia or Emergomyces sp. from other dimorphic fungi. In culture, the above genera are hard to identify by morphological methods alone, and molecular identification is imperative for accurate diagnosis. Urine Histoplasma antigen may aid diagnosis because of high cross-reactivity229. Emmonsia-like infections are highly lethal if untreated, the most effective drug being amphotericin B229, although some azoles appear to have variably low MICs in vitro222.

Es. pasteurianus and other Emergomyces species (Es. africanus and Es. orientalis) isolated from sporadic cases in different countries such as Italy, Spain, China, Canada, South Africa, and Germany underline the potential of Emergomyces species as new cosmopolitan opportunistic pathogens in the immunocompromised host228.

Talaromyces (Penicillium) marneffei 

Talaromyces marneffei (formerly Penicillium marneffei), recently renamed on the basis of new sequence data230, has been recognized as a significant human pathogen across Southeast Asia with the global AIDS pandemic231 and represents an “AIDS-defining pathogen” in this region232,233. However, in recent years, improved treatment of HIV infection with highly active antiretroviral therapy and control of HIV/AIDS because of improvement in the healthcare systems of developing countries in that region, such as mainland China, Thailand, and Vietnam, have led to a change in the epidemiology of T. marneffei infection, and there is an increasing number in immunocompromised non-HIV-infected patients234. These are usually patients receiving immunosuppressive therapies associated with transplantation or autoimmune diseases and hematology patients treated with novel targeted therapies, including anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies and kinase inhibitors234236, but also patients with primary adult-onset immunodeficiency due to anti-interferon-gamma auto-antibodies237. A donor-related transmission in a lung transplant recipient was also recently reported238. Bamboo rats are considered the only identified natural reservoir so far, and transmission is believed to occur through conidia inhalation234,235. As patients with penicilliosis may present all over the world following global travelling, a good travel history is essential for clinical diagnosis239.

The symptoms include fever, weight loss, anemia, lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, respiratory signs, and often molluscum contagiosum-like skin lesions mostly on the face and neck, described as translucent papules, umbilicated with a central necrotic depression235,240. However, clinical diagnosis is challenging, especially in the absence of skin lesions and in non-HIV patients.

Laboratory diagnosis is based on histopathology, direct microscopy, and cultures. Blood cultures are frequently positive, and bone marrow cultures are positive in nearly all cases241. The morphological identification is based on the characteristic colony of the mold phase of the fungus at 25°C with red pigment in the agar and yeast-like arthroconidia in the Gram stain of cultures at 37°C. This finding is crucial, as T. marneffei is the only dimorphic fungus in the Talaromyces genus. New techniques with much shorter turn-around times, such as real-time PCR and MALDI-TOF, are being developed with promising results242,243, but, as with the other rare fungi, increased sensitivity and an expanded database are required in order for them to be introduced into routine practice.

The treatment of choice is intravenous amphotericin B (liposomal formulation 3 to 5 mg/kg per day or lipid complex formulation 5 mg/kg per day) for 2 weeks, followed by oral itraconazole (400 mg/day) for 10 weeks; alternatively, voriconazole can be used (6 mg/kg twice a day on day 1, followed by 4 mg/kg twice a day for at least 12 weeks)244,245.

Conclusions

Rare fungal infectious agents have emerged as important pathogens in recent years because of the expanding population of immunocompromised patients. These fungi are ubiquitous saprobes or plant pathogens and lurk to invade any vulnerable host. The infections they cause are associated with high morbidity and mortality, whereas diagnosis and treatment are challenging. Early diagnosis is of paramount importance but requires a high index of clinical suspicion and accurate diagnostic methods. Conventional diagnostic methods such as direct microscopy, cultures, and histopathology are still essential, but rapid and more specific molecular techniques are needed for early targeted treatment. The currently used PCR-based methods and others, such as MALDI-TOF MS, appear promising but need optimization.

The management of invasive fungal infections is multimodal, and, whenever feasible, surgical debridement and reversal of risk factors are recommended. The efficacy of various antifungals is not uniform, and many of these infectious agents are intrinsically resistant to multiple drugs; in addition, recommendations are mainly based on clinical case experience. Combination treatment, though recommended as salvage therapy in some infections, is controversial in most cases. Despite the use of available antifungals, mortality remains high.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 31 Oct 2017
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Skiada A, Pavleas I and Drogari-Apiranthitou M. Rare fungal infectious agents: a lurking enemy [version 1; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 6(F1000 Faculty Rev):1917 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11124.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 31 Oct 2017
Views
0
Cite
Reviewer Report 31 Oct 2017
Flavio Queiroz-Telles, Division of Infectious Diseases, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil 
Approved
VIEWS 0
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Queiroz-Telles F. Reviewer Report For: Rare fungal infectious agents: a lurking enemy [version 1; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 6(F1000 Faculty Rev):1917 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.12000.r27189)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
0
Cite
Reviewer Report 31 Oct 2017
Tania C Sorrell, Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, University of Sydney at Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia;  Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia 
Approved
VIEWS 0
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Sorrell TC. Reviewer Report For: Rare fungal infectious agents: a lurking enemy [version 1; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 6(F1000 Faculty Rev):1917 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.12000.r27190)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
0
Cite
Reviewer Report 31 Oct 2017
Jean-Phillipe Bouchara, Groupe d'Etude des Interactions Hôte-Pathogène, Université d'Angers, Angers, EA 3142, France;  Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d''Angers, Angers, France 
Approved
VIEWS 0
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Bouchara JP. Reviewer Report For: Rare fungal infectious agents: a lurking enemy [version 1; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 6(F1000 Faculty Rev):1917 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.12000.r27188)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
1
Cite
Reviewer Report 31 Oct 2017
Jacques Meis, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital(CWZ), and Centre of Expertise in Mycology Radboudumc/CWZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands 
Approved
VIEWS 1
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Meis J. Reviewer Report For: Rare fungal infectious agents: a lurking enemy [version 1; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 6(F1000 Faculty Rev):1917 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.12000.r27187)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 31 Oct 2017
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.