Keywords
obesity, bariatric surgery, general anaesthesia, postoperative polygraphy,
obesity, bariatric surgery, general anaesthesia, postoperative polygraphy,
Obesity is on the increase in the western world and is associated with the development of several diseases. It is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and diabetes, two of the leading causes of death globally. Many efforts have been made in trying to treat the condition (http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/). The adverse effects on pulmonary function are also well documented1. With an increasing BMI, the risk for chronic daytime hypoventilation escalates, characterized by an arterial carbon dioxide pressure (PCO2) exceeding 45 mmHg1. Complications include atelectasis, hypoxemia, pulmonary embolism and subsequent acute ventilation failure, and may evolve during perioperative and postoperative phases1. Adverse effects are not concentrated to daytime; obesity is the most frequent predisposing factor of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS)1. Changes in the breathing pattern and pulmonary function may indeed cause compromise of oxygenation and increased risk for oxygen desaturation.
The early postoperative period with residual anaesthetic and analgesic effects may put an obese patient that has just undergone a laparoscopic bariatric procedure at risk for respiratory compromise. It has been debated whether early care should be carried out in a high dependency ward or could be safely done in a general ward.
The present study aimed to monitor first postoperative night respiration, breathing patterns and oxygenation with sleep breathing equipment, in patients having undergone elective laparoscopic bariatric surgery. We wanted to assess whether we could define risk factors associated with hypo/apnea and desaturation episodes.
This is an explorative cohort study; the study protocol was approved by the ethical committee at Karolinska Institutet [Dnr 2015/118 – 31/1 La]. Patients were included in the study after having provided verbal and written informed consent. Each patient filled out a questionnaire to determine if there was a suspicion of OSAS preoperatively; the questionnaire included the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Patients were monitored after surgery from 10 pm during the first postoperative night, until 6 am the next morning, with a portable OSAS breathing pattern monitor Embletta (ResMed). The registration included information about airflow from a nasal cannula, thoracic respiratory movements by an elastic band around the thorax and percutaneous O2 saturation and heart rate from a pulse oximeter.
All patients had anaesthesia and postoperative pain management in accordance to the routines of the department. All patients received premedication with 2 tablets of slow release 655mg paracetamol and 10 mg slow release oral oxycodone prior to surgery. Patients were preoxygenated by FiO2 1.0 and by CPAP of 6 cm H20 in the anaesthetic machine Aisys (GE Healthcare). Anaesthesia was induced with remifentanil target control infusion (TCI), set at a target of 6.0 ng/ml. After 90 seconds the patient was put to sleep with a bolus injection of propofol 2–3 mg/kg. When the patient got apnoeic the ventilation mode was changed to pressure control ventilation-volume guaranteed (PCV-VG), and the patient received neuromuscular blocker rocuronium, followed by endotracheal intubation. Anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane and remifentanil titrated to clinical signs of adequate anaesthesia, and with a BIS (Medtronic, Covidien BIS LoC 2 Channel) value between 25 and 50. All patients received postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis with betamethasone, ondansetron and droperidol. 10 – 15 mg of morphine was administered at the beginning of surgery, as a start dose for the postoperative pain relief regime. The patient had laparoscopic surgery, gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy, as decided by the surgeon. Postoperative care was provided in accordance to routines; fentanyl 25–50 micrograms was used as rescue analgesia and a further 1–5 mg morphine administered as needed. Postoperative respiratory care included oxygen supplementation to satisfactory saturation and once per hour blowing in a T-piece with a one-way valve mouthpiece (Intersurgical). Patients were transferred to the general ward when fully awake and with stable vital signs for 30 minutes. No intervention was done apart from the night breathing monitoring.
There were 52 patients initially included in the study, but 6 were excluded as they had a diagnosis of OSAS and 1 further patient was excluded as the procedure became merely a diagnostic laparoscopy. Forty-five patients were included in the study.
The mean age for the 45 patients studied was 39 (ranging from 19 – 68 years), and the mean BMI was 37 (ranging from 32 – 53). Surgery and anaesthesia was uneventful, mean duration of surgery was 54 minutes (ranging from 27 – 97 minutes) and mean duration of anaesthesia was 108 (ranging from 65 – 217 minutes). Most patients (n=35), had a sleeve gastrectomy and 10 had a gastric bypass procedure.
Mean time between end of anaesthesia and start of the polygraphy was 611 ± 122 minutes and mean duration of polygraphy monitoring was 463 ± 51 minutes.
Mean saturation (SpO2) during the polygraphy was 93% (ranging from 87 – 97). There were 10 patients with a mean SpO2 of less than 92% and 4 with mean of less than 90, with the lowest mean SpO2 being 87%. There were 16 patients with a nadir SpO2 of less than 85%, lowest nadir SpO2 being 63%.
Only 2 patients had an AHI > 5; (AHI 10 and 6). Both underwent sleeve gastrectomy. They also had an ODI > 5 (10 and 24, respectively). These patients had mean saturation 88% and 91% during the registration and SpO2 nadir of 79% and 81%.
In total, 3 patients had an ODI > 5 (24, 10 and 6, respectively). Additionally, 3 patients had more prolonged (> 30 second) apnoea with nadir SpO2 81%, 83% and 86%.
We could not see any difference apart from a shorter duration of anaesthesia between the surgical procedures (See Table 1 and Table 2)
GBP: gastric bypass; Sleeve: sleeve gastrectomy; f: female; m: male.
GBP n=10 | Sleeve n=35 | |
---|---|---|
Age (years) | 37 ± 15 | 49 ± 13 |
Gender (f/m) | 9/1 | 30/5 |
BMI | 36 ± 3 | 37 ± 5 |
GBP: gastric bypass; Sleeve: sleeve gastrectomy.
We found, somewhat surprisingly, only very minor respiratory disturbances in the cohort of patients having undergone elective bariatric surgery. No patients had a hypopnea index above thirty - only 2 had an AHI above 5. A majority of patients had low oxygen saturation of around 93%, and short episodes of saturation below 85% were not uncommon. Thus, the main finding is mild hypoxia and episodes of desaturation, but hypo/apnea monitoring does not provide much additional information. Signs of more pronounced airway compromise causing hypo/apnea were only rarely seen. Low mean saturation and desaturation episodes were however not uncommon. All our patients had no further complications.
The risk for postoperative hypoxia has been known for long. Jones et al. published a review in 1990 addressing the risk for low oxygenation during the early postoperative period, and its multifactorial etiology2. Low saturation and mild hypoxia has also been reported in previous studies.
We are not aware of any previous study explicitly monitoring hypo/apnea during the first postoperative night after bariatric surgery Zaremba et al. studied polysomnography in patients during the early postoperative course, while patients were still in the PACU3. They found that 64% of the 33 patients with complete postoperative polysomnography data had signs of sleep-disordered breathing with an AHI greater than 5/h early after recovery from anaesthesia. The respiratory response to hypoxia and hypercapnia caused by airway obstruction is compromised following major surgery4. Chung et al. studied respiration during the preoperative stage and the first, second and third postoperative nights5. Our results are in line with these results, first night after surgery. Female patients and patients with no or mildly compromised nocturnal breathing showed only minor changes during the first postoperative night in Chung et al’s study as well as in ours. Age, preoperative respiration disturbance and smoking were found to be risk factors for hypo/apnea6.
We used a standard portable breath and saturation monitor, the Embletta system. The portable systems have been shown to be accurate tool for assessment of sleep apnoea7. We did not include EEG monitoring and we did not attach the abdominal movement tracing. Merely the nasal flow, thoracic and saturation was recorded. AHI scores were > 5 for mild, > 15 for intermediate and > 30 for significant airway compromise, or “sleep apnoea”. We assessed SpO2 < 94 as mild hypoxia. The monitoring was initiated during the first evening, an average of ten hours after the end of anaesthesia. It should also be acknowledged that the mean BMI in our cohort was 37, versus s mean BMI of 44 in the US studies3.
Nocturnal oxygen desaturations are not uncommon during the first postoperative night, also in patients undergoing other surgical procedures. Shirmakana et al. found that oxygen desaturation was frequent in patients having undergone breast surgery8. Bowdle looked at a mixed group of ambulatory surgery patients and also found an increase in hypo/apnea and desaturation in the first night after surgery9.
There are recent guidelines from the US association for sleep apnoea10. Germany has also addressed the importance of adequate perioperative care of obese patients at risk for sleep apnoea11. The preoperative evaluation by registration of hypo/apnea is strongly recommended, however advice given around the early postoperative period is sparse.
To put our findings into perspective, our patients had a mean BMI of merely 37. Additionally, we had a majority (39 out of 45) of female patients, and BMI-associated AHI abnormalities are more commonly seen in males12. We did not use the abdominal movement monitoring band to avoid additional abdominal pain. All patients had multi-modal analgesia and opioids were administered as restrictively as possible to maintain adequate pain control.
In conclusion, we have found that elective “low risk” obese patients that have had uncomplicated laparoscopic bariatric surgery, have low saturation during the first postoperative night and may experience short episodes of oxygen saturation of less than 85%, but hypo/apnea is rare and monitoring of obstruction seems not to be of major value. The potential clinical impact of the mild hypoxia and short episodes of desaturations requires further study.
We have followed the STROBE guidelines.
Dataset 1. Raw sleep monitoring data from 45 patients that was used as a basis for the findings in this study. DOI, 10.5256/f1000research.11519.d16177513
JJ and SF were in charge of the study design protocol and processed applications. LW and SF had major roles in patient recruitment and collection of study data. All authors contributed equally to data analysis and manuscript preparation.
Financial support was obtained from the research department at TioHundra Norrtälje.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
References
1. Lumachi F, Marzano B, Fanti G, Basso SM, et al.: Relationship between body mass index, age and hypoxemia in patients with extremely severe obesity undergoing bariatric surgery.In Vivo. 24 (5): 775-7 PubMed AbstractCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 2 (revision) 23 Jun 17 |
read | read |
Version 1 22 May 17 |
read | read |
Click here to access the data.
Spreadsheet data files may not format correctly if your computer is using different default delimiters (symbols used to separate values into separate cells) - a spreadsheet created in one region is sometimes misinterpreted by computers in other regions. You can change the regional settings on your computer so that the spreadsheet can be interpreted correctly.
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Thank you for comments on our paper.
Please excuse the ignorance with the statistical software;
Data was analysed with StatView (v1.04) for MAC.
There ... Continue reading Dear Mehran
Thank you for comments on our paper.
Please excuse the ignorance with the statistical software;
Data was analysed with StatView (v1.04) for MAC.
There are of course limitations and we have tried to address some of them but we did not compile a specific strength and limitation section,
We studied low risk patients undergoing elective bariatric surgery in one center. All patients followed the same clinical pathway and was cared for by a limited number of physicians and nurses, thus perioperative care was standardized. We used a portable respiratory monitoring equipment so called Embletta. There are limitations with this technique and a more advanced polysomography device would have been an option. We did not monitor ECG, and no other specific monitoring of potential ischemic episodes. We did not measure the carbon dioxide tension. A continuous transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitor could have been of interest.
I hope these brief lines can at least to some extent respond to your queries,
Best regards
Jan Jakobsson on behalf of the authors.
Thank you for comments on our paper.
Please excuse the ignorance with the statistical software;
Data was analysed with StatView (v1.04) for MAC.
There are of course limitations and we have tried to address some of them but we did not compile a specific strength and limitation section,
We studied low risk patients undergoing elective bariatric surgery in one center. All patients followed the same clinical pathway and was cared for by a limited number of physicians and nurses, thus perioperative care was standardized. We used a portable respiratory monitoring equipment so called Embletta. There are limitations with this technique and a more advanced polysomography device would have been an option. We did not monitor ECG, and no other specific monitoring of potential ischemic episodes. We did not measure the carbon dioxide tension. A continuous transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitor could have been of interest.
I hope these brief lines can at least to some extent respond to your queries,
Best regards
Jan Jakobsson on behalf of the authors.