Terterov I, Koniakhin S, Vyazmin S et al. Molecular dynamic simulations of glycine amino acid association with potassium and sodium ions in explicit solvent [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2017, 6:74 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10644.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
1St. Petersburg Academic University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation 2Ioffe Physical-Technical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation 3Saint Petersburg Scientific Center RAS, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS
Abstract
Salt solutions are the natural environment in which biological molecules act, and dissolved ions are actively involved in biochemical processes. With metal ions, the membrane potentials are maintained. Ions are crucial for the activity of many enzymes, and their ability to coordinate with chemical groups modulates protein-protein interactions. Here we present a comparative study of sodium and potassium coordination with zwitterionic glycine, by means of explicit solvent molecular dynamics. We demonstrated that contact ion pair of cations and carboxylate group splits into two distinct coordination states. Sodium binding is significantly stronger than for potassium. These results can shed light on the different roles of sodium and potassium ions in abiogenic peptide synthesis.
Keywords
Potassium ion, sodium ion, ion pairing, molecular dynamics, ion coordination
Corresponding author:
Ivan Terterov
Competing interests:
No competing interests were disclosed.
Grant information:
The study was funded by RFBR (14-04-01889) and Program of Fundamental Research of Presidium of RAS "Nanostructures: Physics, chemistry, biology and foundations of technology".
Salt solutions are the natural environment in which biological molecules act. Moreover, the dissolved ions themselves largely participate in many biological processes on a molecular level. Metal ions are essentially cofactors of many enzymes and may coordinate with charged groups, thus modulating protein-protein interactions and their activity1. Many of these manifestations are due to specific ion coordination with charged groups on protein surfaces and other counterions in solutions, rather than the alteration of the aqueous solution structure in the bulk2. Such ion - counterion pairing has been validated experimentally, and described theoretically using molecular simulations3.
Despite apparent similarity, the biological roles of sodium and potassium are very different. For example, the potassium to sodium ion concentration ratio is high inside the cell and low outside, which gives rise to membrane potentials. These two vital ions also demonstrate different catalytic capacity in the model reaction of prebiotic peptide synthesis, where potassium shows a higher activity4. In addition, their roles in abiogenesis are of high interest5.
It was supposed that sodium binds to charged groups on protein surfaces more strongly than potassium does, which probably correlates with the "salting out" sodium effect on proteins, and "salting in", as is known for potassium6. Using an X-ray absorption study of solutions containing dissolved ions and acetate or glycine molecules, it was demonstrated that sodium has superior affinity to carboxylate, one of the major anionic groups in proteins7. In a number of works, such a difference was explained using a combination of molecular dynamics and ab initio calculations6–9. With this method, the difference between sodium and potassium ion association free energies with carboxylate groups has been calculated9.
Using molecular dynamics, it was demonstrated that not only direct ion - carboxylate pair but also the solvent shared ion - carboxylate paired configurations are of great importance10–12. Particularly, these solvent-mediated states appear more populated than direct contact ion pair, and can determine the thermodynamics of acetate salt solutions10. A number of ab initio calculations of ion coordination with amino acids in gas-phase were conducted previously13–15; however solvent effects are significant and should be taken into account10,16,17.
To better understand the molecular details of ion pairing on protein-protein interactions, the spatial distribution of ion positions is of interest. Here we present a molecular dynamic study of the spatial distribution of sodium and potassium coordinated with zwitterionic glycine in a concentrated water ionic solution.
Simulation details
Molecular dynamic (MD) simulations were conducted in GROMACS package (version 4.6.7)18. Simulation systems contained one zwitterionic glycine molecule (as at pH 7 it is the most probable glycine form in solution), 33 cations, 33 chloride anions and about 800 water molecules in a cubic periodic box with 3 nm sides, corresponding to a 2 M salt solution. Equilibration of 10 ns preceded 500 ns production MD for each system with constant number of particles (N), constant pressure (P) and temperature (T) conditions – in NPT ensemble. Temperature at 300 K and pressure at 1 bar were maintained with Nose-Hoover thermostat19,20 and Parrinello-Rahman barostat21. Electrostatics PME method was used22 with grid spacing of 0.12 nm and 1.0 nm cutoff, the same as for van der Waals interactions. For zwitterionic glycine, parameters were from OPLS-AA force field23, all bonds were constrained with LINCS algorithm24 (for more details on parameters see run input files available in Dataset 1). Parameters for cations were obtained from 25, for chloride from 26 and a TIP3P water model was used27. Radial distribution functions were calculated with bin width of 0.004 nm using g_rdf utility of GROMACS package. Spatial distribution were calculated with g_spatial GROMACS utility after least square fit of heavy atoms of glycine molecule from each frame to the position of starting MD structure.
Dataset 1.Run input parameters for production MD in GROMACS version 4.6.7.
Dataset 2.Input typologies and equilibrated structures for production MD (in zipped file).
Results and discussion
Two systems were investigated, each consisted of one glycine dissolved in explicit water with sodium and chloride ions, or potassium and chloride ions. Radial distribution functions (RDF) of Na+ or K+ with respect to oxygen atoms or carbon atoms of glycine carboxylate group were calculated and are plotted in Figure 1 The O-Me+ RDF for both studied ions shows several coordination shells with a pronounced first maximum that is considerably higher for sodium, which lies in agreement with previous studies indicating a superior Na+ affinity6,7,10,12,17. Analysis of C-Me+ RDF, however, is not so common in the literature. C-Me+ RDFs are plotted in Figure 1B, and show two sharp peaks for sodium ions at 0.28 and 0.34 nm, as well as two weaker separate, but distinct peaks for potassium at 0.32 and 0.36 nm. This figure indicates that there are two favorable coordination states of cations with carboxylate groups which both contribute to the single first peak of O-Me+ RDFs.
Figure 2 shows the iso-density surfaces of sodium or potassium ions calculated around glycine and explicitly reveals these coordination states. One sees the medial (m) coordination state equidistant from the oxygen atoms of the carboxylate group, and the lateral (l) state consisting of the two regions being closer to one of the two oxygen atoms. The asymmetry that is seen in the shape of the (l) state regions, including a bridge connecting the (m) and (l) in the case of K+, occurs due to positively charged NH3 group and overall conformational flexibility of glycine. Density levels on the spatial distribution for sodium considerably exceed that for potassium, and during the simulations we occasionally observed only for sodium glycine coordinated with two ions in (m) and (l) states simultaneously (see Figure 3). Distances depicted in Figure 3 clearly illustrate that the (m) state is closer to the C of carboxylate group and corresponds to the first peak on C-Me+ RDF (0.28 nm for Na+). The (l) state corresponds to the next peak (0.34 nm after minimum at 0.3 nm for Na+), while both states belong to the same peak of O-Me+ RDF (0.23 nm for Na+). In sodium simulation, glycine exists with Na+ in (m) coordinated state for 21% of the observation time and with Na+ solely in (l) coordinated state for 30%. For potassium simulation, we obtained 8% and 18% of time for (m) and (l) coordinated states, respectively.
Iso-density surfaces around glycine are shown for Na+ (A and B) and K+ (C and D). Note that the density value (cutoff) for Na+ is much higher than for K+.
Figure 3. Trajectory snapshot of glycine coordinated with two sodium ions in (m) and (l) states simultaneously.
Distances are given in nanometers. Green, sodium atoms; red, oxygen; gray, carbon; water molecules not shown.
Dataset 3.MD trajectories (.xtc) and input files (.tpr) for NaCl and KCl systems (in zipped file). Positions of water molecules are not included.
Conclusions
We demonstrated that contact ion pair of carboxylate group with Na+ or K+ splits into distinct, well occupied, (m) and (l) coordination states. The effect may be of interest in studies devoted to ab initio calculations and in the interpretation of X-Ray absorption data, as they account for (m) coordination state only6–8. Coordination with ions is thought to be crucial in the first stage of abiogenic peptide polymerization process28 and therefore, the observed differences in sodium and potassium behavior are important for research into primary abiogenic peptide synthesis conditions.
Dataset 3: MD trajectories (.xtc) and input files (.tpr) for NaCl and KCl systems (in zipped file). Positions of water molecules are not included. doi, 10.5256/f1000research.10644.d14976631
Author contributions
Designed the setup of the simulation: IT SK SV VB MD. Conducted simulations: IT. Analyzed the data: IT SK SV VB MD. Wrote the manuscript: IT SK VB MD.
Competing interests
No competing interests were disclosed.
Grant information
The study was funded by RFBR (14-04-01889) and Program of Fundamental Research of Presidium of RAS “Nanostructures: Physics, chemistry, biology and foundations of technology”.
Faculty Opinions recommended
References
1.
Collins KD, Neilson GW, Enderby JE:
Ions in water: characterizing the forces that control chemical processes and biological structure.
Biophys Chem.
2007; 128(2–3): 95–104. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
2.
Lo Nostro P, Ninham BW:
Hofmeister phenomena: an update on ion specificity in biology.
Chem Rev.
2012; 112(4): 2286–2322. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
3.
van der Vegt NF, Haldrup K, Roke S, et al.:
Water-Mediated Ion Pairing: Occurrence and Relevance.
Chem Rev.
2016; 116(13): 7626–41. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
4.
Dubina MV, Vyazmin SY, Boitsov VM, et al.:
Potassium ions are more effective than sodium ions in salt induced peptide formation.
Orig Life Evol Biosph.
2013; 43(2): 109–117. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
6.
Vrbka L, Vondrásek J, Jagoda-Cwiklik B, et al.:
Quantification and rationalization of the higher affinity of sodium over potassium to protein surfaces.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2006; 103(42): 15440–15444. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
7.
Aziz EF, Ottosson N, Eisebitt S, et al.:
Cation-specific interactions with carboxylate in amino acid and acetate aqueous solutions: X-ray absorption and ab initio calculations.
J Phys Chem B.
2008; 112(40): 12567–12570. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
8.
Jagoda-Cwiklik B, Vacha R, Lund M, et al.:
Ion pairing as a possible clue for discriminating between sodium and potassium in biological and other complex environments.
J Phys Chem B.
2007; 111(51): 14077–14079. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
9.
Vlachy N, Jagoda-Cwiklik B, Vácha R, et al.:
Hofmeister series and specific interactions of charged headgroups with aqueous ions.
Adv Colloid Interface Sci.
2009; 146(1–2): 42–47. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
11.
Ganguly P, Schravendijk P, Hess B, et al.:
Ion pairing in aqueous electrolyte solutions with biologically relevant anions.
J Phys Chem B.
2011; 115(13): 3734–3739. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
12.
Hajari T, Ganguly P, van der Vegt NF:
Enthalpy-entropy of cation association with the acetate anion in water.
J Chem Theory Comput.
2012; 8(10): 3804–3809. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
13.
Jockusch RA, Lemoff AS, Williams ER:
Effect of metal ion and water coordination on the structure of a gas-phase amino acid.
J Am Chem Soc.
2001; 123(49): 12255–12265. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
14.
Remko M, Rode BM:
Effect of metal ions (li+, na+, k+, mg2+, ca2+, ni2+, cu2+, and zn2+) and water coordination on the structure of glycine and zwitterionic glycine.
J Phys Chem A.
2006; 110:(5): 1960–1967. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
15.
Bush MF, Oomens J, Saykally RJ, et al.:
Effects of alkaline earth metal ion complexation on amino acid zwitterion stability: results from infrared action spectroscopy.
J Am Chem Soc.
2008; 130(20): 6463–6471. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
16.
Tomé LI, Jorge M, Gomes JR, et al.:
Toward an understanding of the aqueous solubility of amino acids in the presence of salts: a molecular dynamics simulation study.
J Phys Chem B.
2010; 114(49): 16450–16459. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
17.
Annapureddy HV, Dang LX:
Molecular mechanism of specific ion interactions between alkali cations and acetate anion in aqueous solution: a molecular dynamics study.
J Phys Chem B.
2012; 116(25): 7492–7498. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
18.
Hess B, Kutzner C, Der Spoel DV, et al.:
Gromacs 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation.
J Chem Theory Comput.
2008; 4(3): 435–447. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
19.
Nosé S:
A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods.
J Chem Phy.
1984; 81(1): 511–519. Publisher Full Text
20.
Hoover WG:
Canonical dynamics: equilibrium phase-space distributions.
Phys Rev A Gen Phys.
1985; 31(3): 1695–1697. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
21.
Parrinello M, Rahman A:
Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method.
J Appl Phys.
1981; 52(12): 7182–7190. Publisher Full Text
22.
Essmann U, Perera L, Berkowitz ML, et al.:
A smooth particle mesh ewald method.
J Chem Phys.
1995; 103(19): 8577–8593. Publisher Full Text
23.
Kaminski GA, Friesner RA, Tirado-Rives J, et al.:
Evaluation and reparametrization of the opls-aa force field for proteins via comparison with accurate quantum chemical calculations on peptides.
J Phys Chem B.
2001; 105(28): 6474–6487. Publisher Full Text
24.
Hess B, Bekker H, Berendsen HJ, et al.:
Lincs: a linear constraint solver for molecular simulations.
J Comput Chem.
1997; 18(12): 1463–1472. Publisher Full Text
25.
Aqvist J:
Ion-water interaction potentials derived from free energy perturbation simulations.
J Phys Chem.
1990; 94(21): 8021–8024. Publisher Full Text
26.
Chandrasekhar J, Spellmeyer DC, Jorgensen WL:
Energy component analysis for dilute aqueous solutions of lithium (1+), sodium (1+), fluoride (1-), and chloride (1-) ions.
J Am Chem Soc.
1984; 106(4): 903–910. Publisher Full Text
27.
Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, et al.:
Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water.
J Chem Phys.
1983; 79(2): 926–935. Publisher Full Text
28.
Coveney PV, Swadling JB, Wattis JA, et al.:
Theory, modelling and simulation in origins of life studies.
Chem Soc Rev.
2012; 41(16): 5430–5446. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
29.
Terterov I, Koniakhin S, Vyazmin S, et al.:
Dataset 1 in: Molecular dynamic simulations of glycine amino acid association with potassium and sodium ions in explicit solvent.
F1000Research.
2017. Data Source
30.
Terterov I, Koniakhin S, Vyazmin S, et al.:
Dataset 2 in: Molecular dynamic simulations of glycine amino acid association with potassium and sodium ions in explicit solvent.
F1000Research.
2017. Data Source
31.
Terterov I, Koniakhin S, Vyazmin S, et al.:
Dataset 3 in: Molecular dynamic simulations of glycine amino acid association with potassium and sodium ions in explicit solvent.
F1000Research.
2017. Data Source
1
St. Petersburg Academic University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation 2
Ioffe Physical-Technical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation 3
Saint Petersburg Scientific Center RAS, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
The study was funded by RFBR (14-04-01889) and Program of Fundamental Research of Presidium of RAS "Nanostructures: Physics, chemistry, biology and foundations of technology".
Terterov I, Koniakhin S, Vyazmin S et al. Molecular dynamic simulations of glycine amino acid association with potassium and sodium ions in explicit solvent [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2017, 6:74 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10644.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.
Share
Open Peer Review
Current Reviewer Status:
?
Key to Reviewer Statuses
VIEWHIDE
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations
A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Choudhury N. Reviewer Report For: Molecular dynamic simulations of glycine amino acid association with potassium and sodium ions in explicit solvent [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2017, 6:74 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.11470.r19642)
In the present molecular dynamics simulation study, the authors are intended to study ion-pair formation of sodium and potassium ions with amino acid glycine. The manuscript is well written. However, major revision of the manuscript along the lines mentioned below
... Continue reading
In the present molecular dynamics simulation study, the authors are intended to study ion-pair formation of sodium and potassium ions with amino acid glycine. The manuscript is well written. However, major revision of the manuscript along the lines mentioned below is required before its publication.
Specific points are as follows:
The authors have used Na+ Force Field parameters from Ref. 25, in which (most probably) the interaction parameters for ions have been calculated from free energy calculation in SPC water. However, in the present case the authors have used TIP3P water. Isn’t it right to use the same water model as the one used for deriving the parameters?
The motivation of the present study is to compare ion-pair formation of an amino acid carboxylate with Na+ and K+ ions in the physiological condition. What is the concentration of sodium or potassium ion in the physiological condition? Are the simulations performed under the same concentration?
Rather than considering two ions in two separate simulations, it is important to consider a mixture of two ions in a single simulation and compare relative affinity of these two ions towards the amino acid.
Why is glycine considered? It is already shown (Ref 6) that carboxylic acid groups of aspartate and glutamate are playing the most important role in determining the interaction of a protein with these ions. Therefore, choice of glycine instead of the above mentioned amino acids needs to be justified. I feel in order to get a trend, the author should take more than one amino acids in separate simulation and observe if the trend is general.
I did not understand the conditions for which Figs. 2(A) and (B) (or (C) and (D) are shown. Please specify it in figure caption as well as in main text.
It is essential to find out the residence time of each of the ions and compare them.
Why in case of carbon-ion g(r) the first peak splits into two, but not in case of oxygen-ion g(r)?
Trajectory snapshot as presented in Fig. 3 has no meaning in a finite temperature MD simulation run. Instead, please provide either average values of these distances or their time dependent behavior.
The authors have mentioned that X-Ray absorption data account for (m) coordination state only. However the present simulation shows both m and l states. Rationalize why the present result is different from the experimental result?
The authors have written “Parameters for cations were obtained from 25, for chloride from 26”. Please write Ref. 25 in place of 25 and Ref. 26 in place of 26.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.
Choudhury N. Reviewer Report For: Molecular dynamic simulations of glycine amino acid association with potassium and sodium ions in explicit solvent [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2017, 6:74 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.11470.r19642)
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations -
A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Spreadsheet data files may not format correctly if your computer is using different default delimiters (symbols used to separate values into separate cells) - a spreadsheet created in one region is sometimes misinterpreted by computers in other regions. You can change the regional settings on your computer so that the spreadsheet can be interpreted correctly.
How to fix it
Save downloaded CSV file
Open spreadsheet program (e.g. Excel)
Click the ‘Data’ tab at the top
Click the ‘From text’ icon (top left)
Browse for downloaded CSV file, click ‘Import’
Ensure ‘Delimited’ radio button is selected, click ‘Next’
Check one of the appropriate delimiter checkboxes (you can visualize the formatting by looking at the data preview below these options)
Terterov I, Koniakhin S, Vyazmin S et al.. Dataset 1 in: Molecular dynamic simulations of glycine amino acid association with potassium and sodium ions in explicit solvent. F1000Research 2017, 6:74 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.10644.d149764)
Spreadsheet data files may not format correctly if your computer is using different default delimiters (symbols used to separate values into separate cells) - a spreadsheet created in one region is sometimes misinterpreted by computers in other regions. You can change the regional settings on your computer so that the spreadsheet can be interpreted correctly.
How to fix it
Save downloaded CSV file
Open spreadsheet program (e.g. Excel)
Click the ‘Data’ tab at the top
Click the ‘From text’ icon (top left)
Browse for downloaded CSV file, click ‘Import’
Ensure ‘Delimited’ radio button is selected, click ‘Next’
Check one of the appropriate delimiter checkboxes (you can visualize the formatting by looking at the data preview below these options)
Terterov I, Koniakhin S, Vyazmin S et al.. Dataset 2 in: Molecular dynamic simulations of glycine amino acid association with potassium and sodium ions in explicit solvent. F1000Research 2017, 6:74 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.10644.d149765)
Spreadsheet data files may not format correctly if your computer is using different default delimiters (symbols used to separate values into separate cells) - a spreadsheet created in one region is sometimes misinterpreted by computers in other regions. You can change the regional settings on your computer so that the spreadsheet can be interpreted correctly.
How to fix it
Save downloaded CSV file
Open spreadsheet program (e.g. Excel)
Click the ‘Data’ tab at the top
Click the ‘From text’ icon (top left)
Browse for downloaded CSV file, click ‘Import’
Ensure ‘Delimited’ radio button is selected, click ‘Next’
Check one of the appropriate delimiter checkboxes (you can visualize the formatting by looking at the data preview below these options)
Terterov I, Koniakhin S, Vyazmin S et al.. Dataset 3 in: Molecular dynamic simulations of glycine amino acid association with potassium and sodium ions in explicit solvent. F1000Research 2017, 6:74 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.10644.d149766)
Adjust parameters to alter display
View on desktop for interactive features
Includes Interactive Elements
View on desktop for interactive features
Competing Interests Policy
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests'
Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper.
You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors.
You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student).
You work at the same institute as any of the authors.
You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission.
You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published.
Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests'
You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements.
You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors.
You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on.
Stay Updated
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Comments on this article Comments (0)