Keywords
hematological profile, PDW, MPV, plasmodium falciparum, P. vivax,
This article is included in the Emerging Diseases and Outbreaks gateway.
hematological profile, PDW, MPV, plasmodium falciparum, P. vivax,
In spite of the preventative measures, malaria remains a major public health concern. Malaria is responsible for 781,000 deaths in a year, the majority of which are in Sub -Saharan Africa1. A correct diagnosis is one of the most important tools in the management of malaria. It has been recommended that all persons with suspected malaria should have a parasitological confirmation of diagnosis1. Microscopic examination of malaria consists of the identification of parasite species in thin and/or thick blood films, which is the “gold standard” for malaria diagnosis1,2. Microscopy requires trained technicians, and well-maintained microscopes with a perfect quality management system. However, acceptable microscopy services are not widely available for the diagnosis of malaria in some areas where malaria is endemic e.g. in communities in Sub-Saharan Africa1.
Previously, measurement of haematological blood parameters was unreliable due to intra and inter-method variation. Nowadays, automated analysers have replaced the traditional methods. Automated analysers are available in most settings and can give reliable results within a short period of time. There is a universal trend toward using these to aid the presumptive diagnosis of malaria infection2,3.
Previous studies have reported different results levels of sensitivity and specificity of haematological parameters as predictors of malaria infection4–8. There is no published data on haematological changes in patients infected with malaria parasites in Sudan, where malaria in the major health problem9. The current study was conducted in New Halfa, eastern Sudan to investigate the haematological changes observed during malaria infection and to assess the reliability of the haematological parameters used for diagnosis.
A case-control study was conducted at the out-patient clinic of New Halfa hospital during the rainy and post rainy season (August 2014 through to January 2015). The cases were patients with symptoms and signs of uncomplicated malaria and who were confirmed to be infected with P. falciparum or P. vivax by microscopic examination of Giemsa stained blood smears during the study10. The controls were the patients that presented to the same clinic with symptoms of malaria but were found to have negative blood films for malaria. After the participants (or their parents/legal guardians if they were minors) provided written informed consent, a clinical history was gathered using questionnaires. Weight and height were measured and body mass index was expressed as kg/m2.
2ml of blood was taken from each participant and placed in a container with EDTA, and a complete hemogram was performed using an automated hematology analyser (Sysmex XN-9000; Hyogo, Japan), following the manufacturers' instructions as previously described11–13. The hemogram included measuring the haemoglobin level, leucocyte count and platelet indices, namely platelet count, mean platelet volume (MPV), and platelet distribution width (PDW).
Thick and thin blood films were prepared and stained with 10% Giemsa to microscopically confirm which participants were infected. If the slide was positive, the parasite density was measured by counting the number of asexual parasites per 200 leukocytes, and multiplied against the participants own leucocytes number/μL. The blood films were considered negative if no parasites were detected in 100 oil immersion fields of a thick blood film.
A minimum sample size of 162 participants for each arm of the study was calculated assuming that 10% of participants would have incomplete data. In this way, it would be possible to calculate a significant difference (at α = 0.05) in the means of the proposed variables - mainly haemoglobin, red cell distribution width (RDW), leucocytes, platelets counts and PDW - between the cases and the controls, at 80% power.
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows, version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Proportions of the studied groups were expressed as percentages and compared using the chi-squared test. Continuous data were checked for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. The means (±SD) or median (IQR) were used to describe the studied variables, depending if they were normally or non-normally distributed. The t-test (or Mann-Whitney U test if the data were not normally distributed) evaluated the differences between the studied groups. Binary regression was calculated, where malaria was the dependent variable and medical and haematological indices were the independent variables. Diagnostic screening tests were used to determine the diagnostic cut-offs of various parameters (based on test sensitivity and specificity) using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
107 (66.9%) and 55 (34.0%) of the uncomplicated malaria cases were infected with P. falciparum and P vivax, respectively. There was no significant difference in the age or BMI between the cases and the controls. Patients had significantly higher body temperature than the controls (Table 1). Their ages ranged between 1.1−55 years in the cases and 1.1−42 years in the controls. Around one third of the cases (53, 32.7%) and one third of the controls (49, 30.2%) were children that were under five years old (p=0.665). There were 81 (50.0%) vs. 79 (48.8%) males in the cases and controls, respectively (p=0.912).
Variables | Patients with malaria (n=162) | Controls (n=162) | P-value |
---|---|---|---|
Age, years | 20.7(19.6) | 20.0 (19.0) | 0.738 |
Body mass index, kg/m2 | 19.8(6.2) | 19.9(14.3) | 0.947 |
Temperature | 38.0 (0.9) | 37.6(1.0) | 0.002 |
Compared with the controls, patients with uncomplicated malaria had significantly lower haemoglobin levels and lower leucocyte, lymphocyte, neutrophil, and platelet counts, but significantly higher RDW, PDW and MPV (Table 2).
Data is displayed as mean (±SD), and the t-test was used because the data was normally distributed.
A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the cut-offs for haemoglobin levels, RDW, leucocytes and platelet counts, PDW and MPV for prediction of malaria infection. The area under the ROC curve is shown in Table 3 and Figure 1, which failed to confirm predictability of hemoglobin, RDW, leucocytes and platelet count. Poor and fair predictability of PDW and MPV for malaria infection was demonstrated; the areas under the curves were 0.637 and 0.726, respectively.
Variable | Area under the curve | P-value | Sensitivity | Specificity | Cut-off |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hemoglobin, g/dl* | 0.365 | 0.001 | |||
Red cell distribution width, % | 0.587 | 0.039 | |||
Leucocytes, X103/mm3 | 0.396 | 0.014 | |||
Platelet count, X103/mm3 | 0.143 | < 0.001 | |||
Platelets distribution width, %* | 0.637 | 0.001 | 72.8 | 56.8 | 14.550 |
Mean platelet volume, fL* | 0.726 | 0.000 | 77.2 | 60.1 | 9.05 |
When the cut-off levels were evaluated using binary regression analysis, PDW ≥14.550 % (OR =2.9, 95% CI =1.64−5.43, P < 0.001) and MPV≥ 9.05fL (OR =2.25, 95% CI =1.12−4.51, P < 0.001) were the most important predictors for malaria infection, (Table 4).
OR: odds ratio.
There was no significant difference in the hemoglobin, leucocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils, platelets counts, RDW, PDW, MPV and the parasite count (P=0.201) when the cases of P. falciparum and P. vivax were compared (Table 5).
Data is displayed as mean (±SD), and the t-test was used because the data was normally distributed.
According to our present findings, PDW and MPV are the two most important haematological predictors of P. falciparum and P. vivax malaria infection. This is in line with a recent finding where Al-Salahy et al. reported that patients in Hajjah, Northwest Yemen with malaria parasitemia had significantly lower hemoglobin, hematocrit, leucocytes, lymphocytes, and platelet counts compared to healthy subjects14. Previous studies have shown that patients with complicated malaria had reduced haematological parameters such as platelet, leucocyte, and RBC counts, which provided relatively good predictors for the diagnosis of malaria infection8,15. On the other hand, the significant differences observed in the haematological parameters between parasitemic Ugandan patients and non-parasitemic Ugandans were only observed in the monocyte and the platelet count16. No significant difference was found between the haemoglobin levels, MCV, MCH, neutrophils, lymphocyte counts or MPV16.
In the current study, a PDW ≥14.550% and MPV ≥ 9.05fL were the main predictors for malaria (OR =2.9 and 2.3). Previous studies have reported an increased MPV level in malaria15,17. Interestingly, Chandra et al reported that an MPV > 8 fL had a sensitivity and specificity of 70.8% and 50.4% for the diagnosis of malaria, respectively8.
The higher PDW and MPV values in malaria could be explained by bone marrow formation of megakaryocytes to compensate for the low absolute platelet count during acute malaria infection8,15. A significantly higher level of the key platelet growth factor (thrombopoietin) has been reported in patients with malaria18. Furthermore, the parasitized RBCs could increase in platelet sensitivity to adenosine diphosphate (ADP), prompting secretion of dense granules19,20.
Nutritional deficiency and haemoglobinopathies were not investigated in the current study and have to be mentioned as study limitations. Haematological parameters formalaria-infested blood may vary depending on the level of malaria endemicity, presence of haemoglobinopathies and nutritional status21,22. Another limitation of the is that we relied on microscopy only for the malaria diagnosis. Some of negative controls may have had undetected parasitemia (submicroscopic parasitemia). We have previously observed that the majority of febrile patients who were parasite negative by microscopy had P. falciparum infection according to PCR results23. Lastly, other infections that might have an effect on blood parameters were not ruled out in both the cases and controls. In conclusion, the study revealed that a PDW ≥14.550% and MPV ≥ 9.05fL were the main predictors for uncomplicated P. falciparum and P. vivax malaria infection.
Dataset 1: Raw data collected as the basis for this study. Plasmf = Blood film for P. falciparum. DOI, 10.5256/f1000research.11767.d16401024
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Medical College, University of Khartoum (3# 2015 1114).
The authors wish to express their sincere gratitude to Mr. Abdulla Hafaz Alla, Najah Laboratory, New Halfa, Sudan for technical assistance.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
No
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Malaria and tropical medicine
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
No
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
No
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Malaria, clinical and epidemiological studies
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |
Version 1 12 Jun 17 |
read | read | read |
Click here to access the data.
Spreadsheet data files may not format correctly if your computer is using different default delimiters (symbols used to separate values into separate cells) - a spreadsheet created in one region is sometimes misinterpreted by computers in other regions. You can change the regional settings on your computer so that the spreadsheet can be interpreted correctly.
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)