Keywords
fetal MRI, automatic segmentation, algorithms, fetal brain, neuroinformatics, cybernetics, applied artificial intelligence
This article is included in the INCF gateway.
This article is included in the Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning gateway.
This article is included in the Data: Use and Reuse collection.
fetal MRI, automatic segmentation, algorithms, fetal brain, neuroinformatics, cybernetics, applied artificial intelligence
We revised the first draft for clarity. Unnecessary words were omitted to make sure that the text flows from one logical point to another.
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Feng Shi
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Ivana Išgum
Sample sorting can be useful for clinical research seeking to measure the feasibility of new ideas and to develop new technology. MaZda software (http://www.eletel.p.lodz.pl/programy/mazda/) makers and developers have shown that they are listening to their users by continuing to release updates and new versions1,2. The samples provided with the manuscript herein were collected and sorted especially for testing upcoming versions of MaZda. The aim is to continue to collaborate with MaZda software engineers in order to code target-recognition semantics and eventually build ideal algorithms for automatic segmentation of the prenatal brain. It is important to also note that it is not an easy task: to deconstruct the scientific knowledge acquired by radiologists after several hours of practice to master the skills of diagnostic imaging. Moreover, we have recently tested MaZda version 4.6 and version 5.0 and made some recommendations to the software engineers3–5. In reaction to our need, the MaZda team announced an upcoming version called qMaZda, being codeveloped with Weka (www.eletel.p.lodz.pl/pms/SoftwareQmazda.html; www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka). We are expecting to see some improvements in qMaZda.
This dataset was created to improve the efficacy of MaZda. Sample collection was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Lodz (permit number: RNN/213/13/KE). Subjects were informed with a written statement of consent for research and publication. As per agreement, personal information was removed from the original specimens.
In terms of subject demographics and phenotypes, the background of the patients was consistent with the majority of the Polish population. In 2015, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported 2.68 million neonatal deaths (WHO fact sheet on congenital anomalies, updated September 2016: www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs370/en/). The estimate of children born with at least one congenital malformation is about 2–3% worldwide (www.who.int/genomics/anomalies/en/Chapter02.pdf). In Poland, the prevalence rate of birth defects was estimated at 52 to 53 per 1000 live births (http://www.marchofdimes.org/materials/global-report-on-birth-defects-the-hidden-toll-of-dying-and-disabled-children-full-report.pdf). Known birth defects can be detected early in pregnancy using non-invasive and/or invasive techniques6–9. Some can even be treated in utero10,11. There flows the rationale behind this collation of fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data to improve the efficacy of MaZda.
The enrolled subjects underwent MRI examination for the purpose of investigating suspected congenital, obstetrical, and placental anomalies that could not be detected by routine ultrasound and genetic amniocentesis. Volunteers who donated fetal MRI samples to create this dataset were in need of fetal, obstetrical or placental care. The criteria for inclusion and exclusion were as follows: 1) 1.5T or 3T MRI; 2) all three anatomical planes were scanned (axial, coronal, and sagittal); 3) individual cross-sectional images are “usable” (i.e., not heavily degraded by noise and artifacts, motion blur, or uncontrollable movement of fetal head); 4) visible fetal brain with no significant malformation; 5) thalamus, gray matter, white matter, and ventricles are also visible (Figure 1). The request to collect MRI scans was sent long after MRI examination was performed. Hence, MRI examination was not prescribed for the purpose of creating this dataset. After looking at 1358 MRI scans in two teleradiology databases, we manually selected 6 patients who had undergone 1.5T MRI examination at Barlicki University Hospital (Łódź, Poland) and 11 patients who had undergone 3T MRI examination at Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital-Research Institute (Łódź, Poland).
Fetal magnetic resonance imaging studies were extracted from compact discs and sorted by gestational age of pregnancy and anatomical plane of the mother.
Electro-radiology technicians performed fetal MRIs, as per details provided on the prescription and hospital regulations12. Hence, we did not have control of MR scanner settings. The technicians stored the MRIs on compact discs (CDs). By default, MaZda version 4.6 and 5 are lacking an automatic samplesort (sorting algorithm) to extract images and arrange them into folders and subfolders. An option was to create a plug-in especially written for MaZda. Due to time consumption, we used other software to carry out image acquisition (Micro Dicom 0.9, Dimensions 2, Sante Dicom 4, Photoshop CS6 64-bit Extended)5. For the extraction of Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) data, we used the 64-bit portable version of Micro Dicom 0.9.1. Most CDs could be accessed with Micro Dicom or Photoshop CS6 64-bit Extended. We used the rescue feature in Sante Dicom 4 to recover the data and export them in DICOM format. Micro Dicom was the preferred samplesort, because it also allowed image selection, batch conversion, and export of DICOM files as 32-bit BMP. Sorting of the sample by MR strength (3T, 1.5T) was carried out with Dimensions 2. Clinical arrangements of the sample by gestational age of pregnancy and anatomical plane of the mother were carried out manually. The primary goal was to select images that had clearly identifiable anatomical regions such as gray matter, white matter, ventricles, and thalamus. It was not possible to complete the task with the MaZda version 5 package, as the available algorithms were lacking automatic segmentation to detect anatomical structures of the fetal brain. Additionally, details about in-depth sorting as well as MRI specifications and file formats are provided in the methods of the cited article5.
Permission to collect samples was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Lodz. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (permit number: RNN/213/13/KE).
Dataset 1: Fetal MRI data. 1.5/3T samples were manually sorted by gestational age and anatomical plane. Format: 32-bit BMP. doi, 10.5256/f1000research.10723.d15029613
MaZda Package v5 RC HG available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/dkxyrzwpzs.1
Micro Dicom 0.9: www.microdicom.com/downloads.html
Dimensions 2: www.skwire.dcmembers.com/wb/pages/software/dimensions-2-folders.php
Sante Dicom 4: www.santesoft.com/downloads.html
Photoshop CS6 64-bit Extended: https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/using/dicom-files.html
HG conceived, designed, and wrote this data descriptor. LS and MRL contributed to sample collection and sorting. LS, MRL, and MS helped with the description and the clinical arrangement of the data. MS helped with editing the research notes, coordinated with the software engineers to get technical feedback, and provided the latest updates. All authors were involved in the revision process and have agreed to the final content.
Medical University of Lodz & Polish Research Committee and affiliated institutions and hospitals; Self-funded; MRI cost was covered by Polish National Health Fund, grants and financial aid from Swedish Ministry of Education and Research/Centrala Studiestödsnämnden and from U.S. Department of Education.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
The authors gratefully acknowledge Rafał Pawliczak and MUL staff for research coordination, logistics, and administration; Paweł Liberski and MUL Neuropathology Department for counsels with funds to cover MRI expenses; Ludomir Stefańczyk and Barlicki Hospital staff for sample supply and clinical feedback; Maria Respondek-Liberska and Matki Polki Hospital for sample supply and clinical feedback; Tadeusz Biegański, ICZMP Director; Michał Strzelecki and TUL staff for providing MaZda software and technical feedback.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?
Partly
Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?
No
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Early brain development
Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?
No
Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?
No
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?
No
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Medical image analysis
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 2 (revision) 08 Sep 17 |
||
Version 1 31 Jan 17 |
read | read |
Click here to access the data.
Spreadsheet data files may not format correctly if your computer is using different default delimiters (symbols used to separate values into separate cells) - a spreadsheet created in one region is sometimes misinterpreted by computers in other regions. You can change the regional settings on your computer so that the spreadsheet can be interpreted correctly.
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (1)