ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Data Note

Germination rates of four Chilean forest trees seeds: Quillaja saponaria, Prosopis chilensis, Vachellia caven, and Caesalpinia spinosa

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
PUBLISHED 10 Sep 2018
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Agriculture, Food and Nutrition gateway.

This article is included in the Plant Science gateway.

This article is included in the Ecology and Global Change gateway.

Abstract

Data on the germination rates of four tree species, natively founded in the Chilean Mediterranean-climate zone, were determined by germination in crop chambers. The obtained data were used to interpolate or extrapolate the time taken for 50% of seeds to germinate in each case. These results are useful for regional native forest research and, in a broad sense, for its use in models to study germination dynamics in Mediterranean-climate zones.

Keywords

germination; native forest; Mediterranean-climate zone

Introduction

Knowledge of the germination rates of a species means that future determination of this rate is unnecessary, preventing the waste of time and seeds.

Quillaja saponaria and Vachellia caven are two of the most representative trees in the Chilean Mediterranean forest (Perez-Quezada & Bown, 2015), so information about these species will be useful for ecological investigation and restoration. Prosopis chilensis is vulnerable in the wild and is a key species of its community (Valdivia & Romero, 2013); data about its propagation is important for conservation biologists.

In this article, we present the germination rates of seeds of Q. saponaria, P. chilensis, V. caven, and Caesalpinia spinosa. Dataset 1 contains the raw data from which these germination rates are calculated (Plaza & Castillo, 2018).

Methods

Samples

All seeds were collected from adult trees. Q. saponaria seeds were collected in VIII Región, Chile; seeds from V. caven, C. spinosa and P. chilensis were from Región Metropolitana, Chile. The seeds were collected between February and April 2017. Information about collection was obtained from the seed provider, CESAF Antumapu, http://cesaf.forestaluchile.cl/.

Table 1 and Table 2 specify the initial number of seeds per plate and the percentage of germinated seeds in some days are shown. Figure 1 shows the obtained values of time taken for 50% of seeds to germinate (TG50).

Table 1. Percentage of germinated seeds of Q. saponaria and P. chilensis incubated for 19 days.

Initial seeds
per plate, n
Seeds germinated, %
Day 0 Day 2 Day 5 Day 13 Day 19
Q. saponaria (n=3 plates)
Average1000.00.052.068.368.6
Standard Error100.00.04.35.45.6
P. chilensis (n=3 plates)
Average960.058.161.565.367.4
Standard Error40.02.62.62.52.4

Table 2. Percentage of germinated seeds of V. caven and C. spinosa incubated for 22 days.

Initial seeds
per plate, n
Seeds germinated, %
Day 0Day 2Day 5Day 7Day 13Day 19Day 22
V. caven (n=3 plates)
Average560.020.066.669.971.774.274.2
Standard error50.03.31.91.41.51.91.9
C. spinosa (n=3 plates)
Average610.00.017.132.544.848.048.5
Standard error30.00.05.84.54.72.92.5
40a78ca6-a3b6-4c61-a85c-c0a61964b78f_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Time taken for 50% of seeds to germinate (TG50) for each species.

Interpolation of Q. saponaria (A), P. chilensis (B) and V. caven TG50 (C), and extrapolation of C. spinosa TG50 (D).

Pretreatment

Pretreatment conditions were suggested by the provider. Briefly, seeds of Q. saponaria were hydrated in tap water overnight. Seeds of P. chilensis were scarified in 95–97%, analytical grade H2SO4 for 10 minutes and then hydrated in tap water overnight. Seeds of V. caven were scarified in 95–97%, analytical grade H2SO4 for 90 minutes and then hydrated in tap water overnight. Seeds of C. spinosa were scarified in 95–97%, analytical grade H2SO4 for 30 minutes and then hydrated in tap water overnight.

Germination

Activated seeds of Q. saponaria, P. chilensis, V. caven, and C. spinosa were placed in Petri plates over a filter paper bed (3 plates per species). Filter paper was then hydrated with distilled water. All plates were incubated in a crop chamber at 20°C, with light/dark cycles of 9 h/15 h. Germination is conditioned by temperature, so altering this factor could completely change the germination rates (Giuliani et al., 2015).

Plates were monitored periodically to count the germinated seeds and refill distilled water. Q. saponaria and P. chilensis plates were monitored until day 19 (Table 1). After that, fungal development made it difficult to check the plates, and a tactile examination of seeds indicated that most of them were rotten.

Plates containing V. caven and C. spinosa were more resistant to contamination and could be monitored until day 22. After this point, germination was too slow, and it was decided to end the experiment. Results are shown in Table 2.

The sample size, provided in the tables, is considered important for the replicability of a germination assay (Ribeiro-Oliveira & Ranal, 2016).

TG50 calculation

For Q. saponaria, P. chilensis and V. caven, the TG50 was linearly interpolated from the two closest points (Figure 1A–C). C. spinosa didn’t reach the 50% germination during the assay, so this was extrapolated using the last five points (Figure 1D). The TG50 of Q. saponaria was 4.9 days. P. chilensis had the fastest germination (TG50 = 1.7 days); V. caven had a TG50 of approximately 3.9 days, and the TG50 of C. spinosa was estimated to be 25.8 days.

Dataset 1.Raw number of germinated seeds for each species, each repeat plate and each time point.
Also included are cumulative number of germinated seeds, percentages of germinated seeds and calculation of the TG50 for each species.

Data availability

Dataset 1. Raw number of germinated seeds for each species, each repeat plate and each time point. Also included are cumulative number of germinated seeds, percentages of germinated seeds and calculation of the TG50 for each species. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.16091.d216429 (Plaza & Castillo, 2018).

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 10 Sep 2018
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Plaza  and Castillo M. Germination rates of four Chilean forest trees seeds: Quillaja saponaria, Prosopis chilensis, Vachellia caven, and Caesalpinia spinosa [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2018, 7:1446 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16091.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 10 Sep 2018
Views
19
Cite
Reviewer Report 18 Dec 2018
Rafael Rubio de Cases, Department of Ecology, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain 
Diego Escobar, Sao Paulo State University-UNESP FCAV, Sao Paulo, Brazil 
Not Approved
VIEWS 19
This is a small study, containing very little data.
Sample sizes of only three plates (n=3) per species are insufficient to draw conclusions.
With such a small sample size, all one could hope would be to draw conclusions ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Rubio de Cases R and Escobar D. Reviewer Report For: Germination rates of four Chilean forest trees seeds: Quillaja saponaria, Prosopis chilensis, Vachellia caven, and Caesalpinia spinosa [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2018, 7:1446 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.17571.r40992)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
15
Cite
Reviewer Report 11 Dec 2018
Diana Soriano, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 15
Authors present germination data for four species from the Chilean Mediterranean forest. I would like to focus on the first statement of the introduction: 

“Knowledge of the germination rates of a species means that future determination of ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Soriano D. Reviewer Report For: Germination rates of four Chilean forest trees seeds: Quillaja saponaria, Prosopis chilensis, Vachellia caven, and Caesalpinia spinosa [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2018, 7:1446 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.17571.r40998)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
12
Cite
Reviewer Report 23 Nov 2018
Madelaine Quiroz Espinoza, Faculty of Technology, University of Santiago, Chile (Usach), Santiago, Chile 
Approved
VIEWS 12
The authors conducted germination trials on seeds of four Chilean forest tree species. They indicate that this information could be useful for conservation and restoration studies. Regarding the methodology, the description of pretreatments and germination trials stands out. The study ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Quiroz Espinoza M. Reviewer Report For: Germination rates of four Chilean forest trees seeds: Quillaja saponaria, Prosopis chilensis, Vachellia caven, and Caesalpinia spinosa [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2018, 7:1446 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.17571.r39828)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
20
Cite
Reviewer Report 08 Nov 2018
Gabriela Saldías, Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Paisaje, Escuela de Arquitectura del Paisaje, Universidad Central de Chile, Santiago, Chile 
Approved
VIEWS 20
The document provides valuable information on the germination rate of four native species. Quillaja saponaria and Vachellia caven are two of the most representative trees of the Chilean Mediterranean forest, Prosopis chilensis is in the category of threat and Caesalpinia ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Saldías G. Reviewer Report For: Germination rates of four Chilean forest trees seeds: Quillaja saponaria, Prosopis chilensis, Vachellia caven, and Caesalpinia spinosa [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2018, 7:1446 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.17571.r39829)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 10 Sep 2018
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.