ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article
Revised

Do age and mating status affect olfactory response of the parasitoid, Microplitis croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to host-related plant odors?

[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
PUBLISHED 19 Dec 2018
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Background: Parasitic wasps (parasitoids) use volatile organic compounds released by herbivore-infested plants to locate their hosts. Response of parasitoids to plant odors may be plastic and dependent on their physiological state. Using Microplitis croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a relatively specialized larval endoparasitoid of Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), we asked whether age and mating status of parasitoids affect their olfactory response to host-related odors.
Methods: Four odor stimuli of varying complexity were selected based on previous reports of parasitoid response to cotton volatiles: cis-3-hexenol (a green leaf volatile), α-pinene (a constitutive monoterpene), a 50/50 v/v binary mixture (cis-3-hexenol + α-pinene), and H. virescens-infested cotton odors. Female M. croceipes used in Y-tube olfactometer bioassays were either mated or unmated, and grouped 1–3, 4–6, and 7–9 d-old. Female parasitoids used in electroantennogram (EAG) recording were mated and grouped 1–3, 4–6, 7–9 and 10–12 d-old.
Results: In Y-tube olfactometer bioassays, neither age nor mating status played a major role in the attraction of parasitoids to test odor stimuli, with two exceptions: 4–6 d-old mated parasitoids showed attraction to the binary mixture, and 1–3 d-old mated parasitoids showed attraction to H. virescens-infested cotton. Age did not affect EAG response of parasitoids to test stimuli.
Conclusions: The present results suggest that age and mating status do not play a major role in modulating olfactory responses of M. croceipes to host-related plant odors. Instead, plasticity of olfactory response may be limited in M. croceipes due to strong innate sensitivity to host-related odor cues.

Keywords

cotton, electroantennogram, Heliothis virescens, physiological state, Y-tube olfactometer

Revised Amendments from Version 1

The new version includes minor changes suggested by one of the reviewers. Specifically, we have indicated that the same controlled conditions (temperature and humidity) used for insect rearing were maintained during bioassays.

See the authors' detailed response to the review by Andrea Clavijo McCormick
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Lukasz Stelinski

Introduction

Parasitic wasps (parasitoids) use volatile organic compounds (VOCs) released by herbivore-infested plants as odor cues to locate their hosts1–4. However, the level of olfactory response to VOCs may not remain consistent throughout the duration of parasitoid adult life. Changes in physiological states can affect response to VOCs in parasitoids and other insects5–9. Olfactory plasticity in insects has been previously attributed to changes in physiological states such as age, mating, and nutritional status6,9–13.

Aging has been shown to affect olfaction in insects9,14–16. This effect may be associated with senescence of olfactory structures or processing units in insects. For instance, behavioral senescence of responses involved with locomotion, olfaction, and learning has been reported in fruit flies17–19. However, previous studies have reported mixed results regarding age-related plasticity of response to VOCs in parasitoids, thus the need for further studies14,20,21. Mating status of female parasitoids has also been reported to influence their foraging behavior and parasitization potential, with mated females showing a higher parasitization rate than unmated females13,22,23. However, the effect of mating on plasticity of parasitoid response to host-related plant volatiles has gained little attention despite its implications and relevance to host searching and parasitization potential (but see Chen & Fadamiro24).

In the present study, the relatively specialized larval endoparasitoid, Microplitis croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and its caterpillar host, Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) were used as a study system to test the effect of age and mating status on the olfactory response of parasitoids to host-related plant volatiles. Heliothis virescens is a generalist herbivore and a serious pest of cotton, tobacco, and other crops of economic importance25. Based on previous reports on olfactory response in M. croceipes to cotton volatiles26–30, four odor stimuli of varying complexity were chosen. These include: cis-3-hexenol (a green leaf volatile), α-pinene (a constitutive monoterpene), a 50/50 v/v binary mixture (cis-3-hexenol + α-pinene), and headspace volatiles from H. virescens-infested cotton. cis-3-Hexenol and α-pinene have been consistently detected in the headspace of H. virescens-infested cotton1,29,31 and have been reported to elicit antennal and behavioral responses in M. croceipes24,26,29,30.

Y-tube olfactometer was used to test attraction (behavioral response) of parasitoids while electroantennogram (EAG) was used to record antennal response of female M. croceipes to select host-related cotton volatiles. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the few studies that investigated the effects of age and mating status on olfactory responses of parasitoids to host-related plant volatiles. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Methods

Insects

Cocoons of Microplitis croceipes were provided by the USDA-ARS, Insect Biology and Population Management Research Laboratory (Tifton, Georgia, USA) and reared in our laboratory (Auburn University, AL, USA) on 2nd – 3rd instar larvae of H. virescens. Upon emergence, adult wasps were transferred to aerated plastic BugDorm® cages (Megaview Science Co. Taichung, Taiwan) and supplied with 10% sucrose/water solution (w/v). Naive (untrained) parasitoids were used in both EAG and Y-tube olfactometer bioassays to test innate responses of parasitoids to host-related plant odors. Eggs of H. virescens were initially purchased from Benzon Research Inc. (Carlislie, PA, USA) and reared in our laboratory at Auburn University. Larvae of H. virescens were reared on pinto bean artificial diet according to Shorey and Hale32. In total, about 640 female parasitoids were used for bioassays. The general conditions for insect rearing and bioassays were 25 ± 1°C, 75 ± 5 % RH and L14:D10 h photoperiod.

Plants

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum, var. max 9, All-Tex Seed Inc., Levelland, TX, USA) plants were grown in individual pots (9 cm high, 11 cm diameter) in a growth chamber at 26.6°C day, 25.6°C night, 60% RH, L16:D8 h (L:D) photoperiod. Seeds were planted in a top soil/vermiculate mixture. Plants used for headspace volatile collections were 4–6 weeks-old.

Age and mating status treatments

Upon emergence, parasitoids were separated based on their sex. Subsequently, an equal number of females were randomly designated to ‘mated’ or ‘unmated’ cages. Male parasitoids were put inside cages (19 × 13 × 10 cm) designated to mated females at a 2:1 (male: female) ratio while cages designated to unmated females contained females only. Female parasitoids were allowed to mate for at least 24 h before use in bioassays. Both mated and unmated females were further designated to separate cages based on their age. Age groups 1–3, 4–6 and 7–9 d-old were used in Y-tube olfactometer bioassays while age groups 1–3, 4–6, 7–9, and 10–12 d-old were used in electroantennogram (EAG) recording. The 10-12 d-old age group was not included in behavioral bioassays due to low numbers of insects surviving beyond 10 days in the laboratory, resulting in a low number of replicates. It should be noted that Y-tube olfactometer bioassays required more replicates than EAG recording.

Headspace volatile collection

Headspace volatiles were collected from H. virescens-infested cotton plants using the protocol described by Ngumbi et al.31. A plant pot with soil was wrapped with aluminum foil to minimize contamination. The plant was then placed in a volatile collection chamber (Analytical Research Systems, Inc., Gainesville, FL, USA) consisting of a 5-L air-tight glass jar. A purified air stream of 500 ml/min was passed through the jar at room temperature using Teflon tubing connected to an air delivery system. To induce volatiles from plants, 30 2nd –3rd instar larvae of H. virescens were allowed to feed on a cotton plant for 24 h during volatile collection from 1100 h one day to 1100 h of the following day. Headspace volatiles were collected with a trap containing 50 mg of Super-Q (CAT#: 2735, Alltech Associates, Deerfield, IL, USA) and eluted with 300 µl of methylene chloride. The resulting extract was stored in a freezer (-20°C) until use.

Y-tube olfactometer bioassays

A Y-tube olfactometer (Analytical Research Systems, Inc., Gainesville, FL, USA) was used to test attraction of female M. croceipes to four odor stimuli of varying complexity. The setup and procedure was similar to that reported by Morawo and Fadamiro33. Parasitoids were introduced individually into the olfactometer and allowed to make a choice between test stimulus and control. Insects were tested once and discarded. Parasitoids that made no choice within 5 min were removed and excluded from the analyses. The number of non-responding parasitoids in the 24 sets of bioassays ranged from 0 to 5 with a mean of 1.2 insects per test.

cis-3-Hexenol (CAT#: W256307) and α-pinene (CAT#: 147524) (purity 95-99%; Sigma-Aldrich®, St. Louis, MO, USA) were individually formulated in hexane (HPLC-grade) at 1 µg/µl concentration. A 50/50 v/v binary mixture (cis-3-Hexenol + α-pinene) of the two compounds was also prepared. A central dose of 10 µg (10 µl sample) was previously determined to be optimal in a related study30. In separate bioassays, each compound or binary mixture was delivered as a 10 µl sample on filter paper strips (40 × 7 mm, CAT#: 1001090, Whatman® No. 1) in the treatment arm while the control arm contained the same volume of hexane (solvent control). Humidified and purified (charcoal filtered) air was pushed into each arm at the rate of 250 ml/min and removed by suction from the central arm of the olfactometer at the rate of 500 ml/min to avoid odor mix-up.

To test parasitoid response to H. virescens-infested cotton, one arm of the olfactometer was connected to an air-tight glass jar (5-L) containing an infested plant (with host larvae). The other arm was connected to a similar glass jar containing a pot of soil covered with aluminum foil, which served as control. A new plant was used on different days during which bioassays were conducted (5–7 plant replicates). Inlet air was pushed into the olfactometer through each jar at the rate of 300 ml/min and sucked out at the rate of 600 ml/min. Experiments were performed in a randomized complete block design with equal number of insect replicates from each age and mating status groups tested per day (n = 20 per test). All olfactometer bioassays were conducted between 1100 h and 1700 h on different days.

Electroantennogram recording (EAG)

EAG response of female M. croceipes was recorded to measure odor perception in mated parasitoids. The EAG protocol used was previously described by Ngumbi et al.31. Glass capillaries (1.1 mm I.D.) filled with Ringer solution served as reference and recording electrodes. The reference electrode was connected to the back of the head of a female M. croceipes while the recording electrode was connected to the cut tip of the terminal segment of the antenna. The analog signal was detected through a probe (INR-II, Syntech, the Netherlands), and was captured and processed with a data acquisition controller (IDAC-4, Syntech, the Netherlands). EAG 2000 software v2.7 (Syntech, the Netherlands) was used to analyze digital signal readouts. Test stimuli were delivered as 10-µl samples (10 µg dose) on filter paper strips (7 × 40 mm) placed inside 14 cm Pasteur pipettes (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA).

Four treatment stimuli and two control stimuli were individually delivered as 0.2-s puffs of air, with 2 min interval between puffs. For each antennal preparation, the following stimuli were presented: hexane (control), methylene chloride (control), cis-3-hexenol, α-pinene, binary mixture, headspace volatile extract, hexane and methylene chloride. Thus, hexane and methylene chloride (solvent controls) were applied at the beginning and end of each recording series while the position of other test stimuli was randomized across replicates (see Morawo et al.34). Recordings were performed in a randomized complete block design with equal number of insect replicates (n = 10) from each age group tested per day.

Data analyses

Attraction of parasitoids to each of four test stimuli in Y-tube olfactometer was modeled as a binary response (stimulus = 1, control = 0) using logistic regression to analyze possible interactions between age and mating status factors. The model adequacy for each set of experiment was confirmed with a likelihood ratio test35. When no significant interaction was recorded, each factor was analyzed separately. For olfactometer data, deviation of parasitoid responses from a 50:50 (stimulus: control) distribution was analyzed using a Chi-square goodness-of-fit test. Absolute EAG responses (EAG response to solvent control deducted from EAG response to test stimuli) of mated parasitoids across age groups were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test. All analyses were performed in SAS v9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) with P = 0.05 level of significance.

Results

Effect of age and mating on attraction of parasitoids in Y-tube olfactometer

Overall, there was no significant interaction between age and mating status factors for any of the four odor stimuli tested (cis-3-hexenol: P = 0.7295, Figure 1A; α-pinene: P = 0.7352, Figure 1B; binary mixture: P = 0.1136, Figure 1C; host-infested cotton: P = 0.7044, Figure 1D; Logistic Regression). However, mated parasitoids, 4-6 d-old were significantly (80/20%, χ2= 7.20, df = 1, P =0.0073) more attracted to the binary mixture (cis-3-hexenol + α-pinene) compared to hexane control (Figure 1C). Similarly, 1-3 d-old mated parasitoids were significantly (75/25%, χ2= 5.00, df = 1, P =0.0253) more attracted to H. virescens-infested cotton compared to control (Figure 1D). Parasitoids did not show significant attraction to test stimuli in other Y-tube olfactometer bioassays.

2b4f12ff-9e51-4a8b-b0dd-047c67675bfa_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Effect of age and mating status on the attraction of female Microplitis croceipes to four host-related plant odors in Y-tube olfactometer bioassays.

Bars represent percentage of mated and unmated parasitoids of ages 1–3, 4–6, and 7–9 d-old when given a choice between hexane (solvent control) and synthetic compounds cis-3-hexenol (A), α-pinene (B), a 50/50 v/v binary mixture of cis-3-hexenol and α-pinene (C), and a choice between control jar (with no plant) and Heliothis virescens-infested cotton (D). Synthetic compounds were formulated in hexane at 1 µg/µl and presented as 10 µl samples (10 µg dose). Thirty 2nd–3rd instar larvae of H. virescens were allowed to infest cotton plants for 24 h before bioassays. N = 20 responding parasitoids per choice test. Numbers in the bars indicate actual number of responding individuals that chose each arm of the olfactometer. Asterisk (*) indicates significant deviation of parasitoid responses from a 50:50 (stimulus: control) distribution (χ2 goodness of fit test, P < 0.05).

Effect of age on EAG response of parasitoids

In general, the age of mated female M. croceipes did not have a significant effect on their EAG response to test odor stimuli (Figure 2). Both relatively young and older parasitoids showed similar levels of innate antennal sensitivity to single components, binary mixture and headspace volatile extract of host-infested cotton. These results are mostly in agreement with those recorded in Y-tube olfactometer bioassays.

2b4f12ff-9e51-4a8b-b0dd-047c67675bfa_figure2.gif

Figure 2. Effect of age on the electroantennogram (EAG) response of mated female Microplitis croceipes to four host-related plant odors.

Bars represent mean absolute EAG responses (mV± SE, N = 10) of mated parasitoids age 1–3, 4–6, 7–9 and 10–12 d-old to cis-3-hexenol (A), α-pinene (B), a 50/50 v/v binary mixture of cis-3-hexenol and α-pinene (C), and Heliothis virescens-infested cotton headspace volatile extract (D). Absolute EAG for each stimulus is the actual EAG value minus EAG value of solvent control. Synthetic compounds were formulated in hexane at 1 µg/µl and presented as 10 µl samples (10 µg dose). NS indicates no significant difference.

Odor stimulusAge groups (days)Mating statusChoiceNumber of insects
cis-3-hexenolone-threeUnmatedTreatment arm11
cis-3-hexenolone-threeUnmatedControl arm9
cis-3-hexenolone-threeMatedTreatment arm14
cis-3-hexenolone-threeMatedControl arm6
cis-3-hexenolfour-sixUnmatedTreatment arm10
cis-3-hexenolfour-sixUnmatedControl arm10
cis-3-hexenolfour-sixMatedTreatment arm10
cis-3-hexenolfour-sixMatedControl arm10
cis-3-hexenolseven-nineUnmatedTreatment arm10
cis-3-hexenolseven-nineUnmatedControl arm10
cis-3-hexenolseven-nineMatedTreatment arm11
cis-3-hexenolseven-nineMatedControl arm9
Alpha-pineneone-threeUnmatedTreatment arm9
Alpha-pineneone-threeUnmatedControl arm11
Alpha-pineneone-threeMatedTreatment arm7
Alpha-pineneone-threeMatedControl arm13
Alpha-pinenefour-sixUnmatedTreatment arm9
Alpha-pinenefour-sixUnmatedControl arm11
Alpha-pinenefour-sixMatedTreatment arm10
Alpha-pinenefour-sixMatedControl arm10
Alpha-pineneseven-nineUnmatedTreatment arm10
Alpha-pineneseven-nineUnmatedControl arm10
Alpha-pineneseven-nineMatedTreatment arm11
Alpha-pineneseven-nineMatedControl arm9
Binary mixtureone-threeUnmatedTreatment arm11
Binary mixtureone-threeUnmatedControl arm9
Binary mixtureone-threeMatedTreatment arm11
Binary mixtureone-threeMatedControl arm9
Binary mixturefour-sixUnmatedTreatment arm11
Binary mixturefour-sixUnmatedControl arm9
Binary mixturefour-sixMatedTreatment arm16
Binary mixturefour-sixMatedControl arm4
Binary mixtureseven-nineUnmatedTreatment arm14
Binary mixtureseven-nineUnmatedControl arm6
Binary mixtureseven-nineMatedTreatment arm10
Binary mixtureseven-nineMatedControl arm10
HIVOCone-threeUnmatedTreatment arm12
HIVOCone-threeUnmatedControl arm8
HIVOCone-threeMatedTreatment arm15
HIVOCone-threeMatedControl arm5
HIVOCfour-sixUnmatedTreatment arm13
HIVOCfour-sixUnmatedControl arm7
HIVOCfour-sixMatedTreatment arm13
HIVOCfour-sixMatedControl arm7
HIVOCseven-nineUnmatedTreatment arm11
HIVOCseven-nineUnmatedControl arm9
HIVOCseven-nineMatedTreatment arm11
Dataset 1.Attraction of female Microplitis croceipes to four host-related plant odors in Y-tube olfactometer bioassays.
Odor stimulusMating statusAge group (days)EAG (mV)
cis-3-hexenolmatedone-three0.31
cis-3-hexenolmatedone-three0.427
cis-3-hexenolmatedone-three0.387
cis-3-hexenolmatedone-three0.498
cis-3-hexenolmatedone-three0.271
cis-3-hexenolmatedone-three0.4545
cis-3-hexenolmatedone-three0.134
cis-3-hexenolmatedone-three0.2905
cis-3-hexenolmatedone-three0.345
cis-3-hexenolmatedone-three0.6465
cis-3-hexenolMatedfour-six0.1855
cis-3-hexenolMatedfour-six0.303
cis-3-hexenolMatedfour-six0.3365
cis-3-hexenolMatedfour-six0.363
cis-3-hexenolMatedfour-six0.116
cis-3-hexenolMatedfour-six0.342
cis-3-hexenolMatedfour-six0.1505
cis-3-hexenolMatedfour-six0.2625
cis-3-hexenolMatedfour-six0.2435
cis-3-hexenolMatedfour-six0.245
cis-3-hexenolMatedseven-nine0.433
cis-3-hexenolMatedseven-nine0.2105
cis-3-hexenolMatedseven-nine0.288
cis-3-hexenolMatedseven-nine0.3915
cis-3-hexenolMatedseven-nine0.4565
cis-3-hexenolMatedseven-nine0.299
cis-3-hexenolMatedseven-nine0.436
cis-3-hexenolMatedseven-nine0.22
cis-3-hexenolMatedseven-nine0.537
cis-3-hexenolMatedseven-nine0.5235
cis-3-hexenolMatedten-twelve0.3445
cis-3-hexenolMatedten-twelve0.4065
cis-3-hexenolMatedten-twelve0.387
cis-3-hexenolMatedten-twelve0.207
cis-3-hexenolMatedten-twelve0.2135
cis-3-hexenolMatedten-twelve0.3705
cis-3-hexenolMatedten-twelve0.191
cis-3-hexenolMatedten-twelve0.2805
cis-3-hexenolMatedten-twelve0.351
cis-3-hexenolMatedten-twelve0.344
Alpha-pinenematedone-three0
Alpha-pinenematedone-three0.119
Alpha-pinenematedone-three0.088
Alpha-pinenematedone-three0.275
Alpha-pinenematedone-three0.094
Alpha-pinenematedone-three0.0735
Alpha-pinenematedone-three0.006
Alpha-pinenematedone-three0.0915
Alpha-pinenematedone-three0.137
Alpha-pinenematedone-three0.1095
Alpha-pineneMatedfour-six0.0545
Alpha-pineneMatedfour-six0.084
Alpha-pineneMatedfour-six0.0615
Alpha-pineneMatedfour-six0.07
Alpha-pineneMatedfour-six0
Alpha-pineneMatedfour-six0.04
Alpha-pineneMatedfour-six0
Alpha-pineneMatedfour-six0
Alpha-pineneMatedfour-six0.1155
Alpha-pineneMatedfour-six0.069
Alpha-pineneMatedseven-nine0.101
Alpha-pineneMatedseven-nine0.1125
Alpha-pineneMatedseven-nine0.132
Alpha-pineneMatedseven-nine0.0925
Alpha-pineneMatedseven-nine0.1295
Alpha-pineneMatedseven-nine0.232
Alpha-pineneMatedseven-nine0.073
Alpha-pineneMatedseven-nine0.107
Alpha-pineneMatedseven-nine0.168
Alpha-pineneMatedseven-nine0.0865
Alpha-pineneMatedten-twelve0.0765
Alpha-pineneMatedten-twelve0.0775
Alpha-pineneMatedten-twelve0.079
Alpha-pineneMatedten-twelve0.051
Alpha-pineneMatedten-twelve0.0335
Alpha-pineneMatedten-twelve0.0685
Alpha-pineneMatedten-twelve0.047
Alpha-pineneMatedten-twelve0.1435
Alpha-pineneMatedten-twelve0.095
Alpha-pineneMatedten-twelve0.073
Binary mixturematedone-three0.163
Binary mixturematedone-three0.308
Binary mixturematedone-three0.311
Binary mixturematedone-three0.41
Binary mixturematedone-three0.195
Binary mixturematedone-three0.2745
Binary mixturematedone-three0.073
Binary mixturematedone-three0.1835
Binary mixturematedone-three0.342
Binary mixturematedone-three0.2285
Binary mixtureMatedfour-six0.1885
Binary mixtureMatedfour-six0.206
Binary mixtureMatedfour-six0.2445
Binary mixtureMatedfour-six0.214
Binary mixtureMatedfour-six0.094
Binary mixtureMatedfour-six0.32
Binary mixtureMatedfour-six0.2545
Binary mixtureMatedfour-six0.0955
Binary mixtureMatedfour-six0.2525
Binary mixtureMatedfour-six0.126
Binary mixtureMatedseven-nine0.232
Binary mixtureMatedseven-nine0.3075
Binary mixtureMatedseven-nine0.242
Binary mixtureMatedseven-nine0.1935
Binary mixtureMatedseven-nine0.2585
Binary mixtureMatedseven-nine0.244
Binary mixtureMatedseven-nine0.137
Binary mixtureMatedseven-nine0.272
Binary mixtureMatedseven-nine0.412
Binary mixtureMatedseven-nine0.3735
Binary mixtureMatedten-twelve0.2535
Binary mixtureMatedten-twelve0.3335
Binary mixtureMatedten-twelve0.226
Binary mixtureMatedten-twelve0.228
Binary mixtureMatedten-twelve0.1895
Binary mixtureMatedten-twelve0.3345
Binary mixtureMatedten-twelve0.246
Binary mixtureMatedten-twelve0.2655
Binary mixtureMatedten-twelve0.235
Binary mixtureMatedten-twelve0.213
HIVOCmatedone-three0.6985
HIVOCmatedone-three1.0235
HIVOCmatedone-three1.1425
HIVOCmatedone-three1.266
HIVOCmatedone-three1.017
HIVOCmatedone-three0.9685
HIVOCmatedone-three0.467
HIVOCmatedone-three0.912
HIVOCmatedone-three0.812
HIVOCmatedone-three1.332
HIVOCMatedfour-six0.747
HIVOCMatedfour-six0.844
HIVOCMatedfour-six0.9715
HIVOCMatedfour-six0.895
HIVOCMatedfour-six1.201
HIVOCMatedfour-six0.822
HIVOCMatedfour-six1.024
HIVOCMatedfour-six0.709
HIVOCMatedfour-six0.9555
HIVOCMatedfour-six0.7765
HIVOCMatedseven-nine0.8865
HIVOCMatedseven-nine0.952
HIVOCMatedseven-nine0.575
HIVOCMatedseven-nine0.787
HIVOCMatedseven-nine0.9725
HIVOCMatedseven-nine0.8265
HIVOCMatedseven-nine0.9115
HIVOCMatedseven-nine0.595
HIVOCMatedseven-nine1.06
HIVOCMatedseven-nine0.9595
HIVOCMatedten-twelve0.8095
HIVOCMatedten-twelve1.2615
HIVOCMatedten-twelve0.778
HIVOCMatedten-twelve0.7985
HIVOCMatedten-twelve0.916
HIVOCMatedten-twelve0.852
HIVOCMatedten-twelve0.921
HIVOCMatedten-twelve0.865
HIVOCMatedten-twelve0.8925
Dataset 2.Electroantennogram (EAG) response of female Microplitis croceipes to four host-related plant odors.

Discussion

Age and mating status are among several physiological factors that may affect olfactory responses of parasitoids to odor cues used in foraging. In the present study, neither age nor mating status of female M. croceipes played a major role in their olfactory responses to host-related plant volatiles. In general, relatively younger parasitoids showed similar levels of attraction to test stimuli as older parasitoids. Likewise, mated and unmated female parasitoids showed little or no difference in their attraction to host-related odors in Y-tube olfactometer bioassays. Subsequent experiments were conducted to measure the level of odorant perception in mated female parasitoids across age groups. The results showed that EAG response of mated parasitoids was not significantly different across age groups.

Although aging may negatively affect the host searching ability of female parasitoids, it may not always be attributed to a decline in odor perception in all species. Previous studies showed that relatively younger parasitoids tend to parasitize at a significantly higher rate than older parasitoids36–39. This may be in part due to senescence of some odorant processing apparatus or due to a decrease in energy levels in older parasitoids, thus affecting foraging activities. In a previous related study, age did not affect EAG response of M. croceipes to single VOCs21. In instances where age played a significant role, plasticity of olfactory response in insects at the peripheral and behavioral levels has been attributed to senescence through physiological and neuronal mechanisms17,19.

A few previous studies have reported that the mating status of female parasitoids may affect their foraging behavior and parasitization potential13,22,23,40. In the present study, mating status of female M. croceipes had no significant effect on their olfactory response to host-related odors. This suggests that both virgin and mated females of M. croceipes are likely to seek hosts using host-related odor cues. The concepts of haplodiploidy and optimal foraging provide a better understanding of the ecological ramifications of these results. Haplodiploid parasitoids such as M. croceipes produce male-only offspring from unfertilized eggs and male/female offspring from fertilized eggs. If the sex ratio of a local population is already at equilibrium, host foraging by unmated females may yield immediate benefits41. Otherwise, the cost may outweigh immediate benefits with the development of a male-biased population. Mated females are expected to optimize host foraging and produce progeny with a more balanced sex ratio, which is a critical fitness benefit for the population.

Overall, age and mating did not significantly affect the attraction of female M. croceipes to four test stimuli of varying complexity in the present study, with a few exceptions: mated parasitoids, 4–6 d-old showed significant attraction to the binary mixture and 1–3 d-old mated parasitoids showed significant attraction to H. virescens-infested cotton. The degree of host specificity in M. croceipes may provide a plausible explanation for the overall pattern and exceptions recorded in the present study. It has been proposed that specialist parasitoids exhibit strong congenitally fixed responses while generalist parasitoids exhibit greater plasticity of response to host-related cues42. This hypothesis is consistent with the present results in which M. croceipes (specialist) showed little olfactory plasticity with changes in physiological state. However, M. croceipes is not a strictly specialized species at the extreme of the spectrum. Instead, M. croceipes is a relatively specialized parasitoid utilizing Heliothis/ Helicoverpa host species43. This may possibly explain the few exceptions in which mated and relatively young parasitoids showed significant attraction to the binary mixture and host-infested cotton.

In summary, the current findings suggest that age and mating status do not play a major role in modulating olfactory responses of M. croceipes to host-related odors. Instead, plasticity of olfactory response may be limited in M. croceipes due to a strong innate sensitivity to host-related odor cues. This may have an impact on their potential as biological control agents. Other physiological factors such as level of nutrition may also have significant effect on olfactory plasticity in parasitoids11,44. This creates an opportunity for augmentation of parasitoids after field releases. Future studies, especially in the field, should investigate the effect of other physiological conditions that may affect plasticity of behavioral response to host-related odors in natural enemies.

Data availability

The work presented here was part of an MS project completed by MB. The results presented here have been previously published as MB’s MS thesis available from Auburn University Electronic Theses and Dissertations repository: http://hdl.handle.net/10415/5108

F1000Research: Dataset 1. Attraction of female Microplitis croceipes to four host-related plant odors in Y-tube olfactometer bioassays, https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.16927.d22466945

F1000Research: Dataset 2. Electroantennogram (EAG) response of female Microplitis croceipes to four host-related plant odors, https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.16927.d22467046

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 20 Nov 2018
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Burrows M, Morawo T and Fadamiro H. Do age and mating status affect olfactory response of the parasitoid, Microplitis croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to host-related plant odors? [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2018, 7:1817 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16927.2)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 20 Nov 2018
Views
13
Cite
Reviewer Report 05 Dec 2018
Andrea Clavijo McCormick,  Institute of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand 
Approved
VIEWS 13
The article by Burrows and coworkers investigates the olfactory responses of mated and unmated Microplitis croceipes females of different age-groups to host-related plant volatiles. The results indicate that age and mating status do not affect the odour-guided behaviour or EAG responses ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Clavijo McCormick A. Reviewer Report For: Do age and mating status affect olfactory response of the parasitoid, Microplitis croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to host-related plant odors? [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2018, 7:1817 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.18508.r41225)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 18 Dec 2018
    Tolulope Morawo, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, 36849, USA
    18 Dec 2018
    Author Response
    We thank the reviewer for the comments on the manuscript. We have indicated that the same general conditions (25 ± 1°C, 75 ± 5 % RH) used for insect rearing were ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 18 Dec 2018
    Tolulope Morawo, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, 36849, USA
    18 Dec 2018
    Author Response
    We thank the reviewer for the comments on the manuscript. We have indicated that the same general conditions (25 ± 1°C, 75 ± 5 % RH) used for insect rearing were ... Continue reading
Views
12
Cite
Reviewer Report 30 Nov 2018
Lukasz Stelinski, Department of Entomology and Nematology, Citrus Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Lake Alfred, FL, USA 
Approved
VIEWS 12
This manuscript describes a set of behavioural and electrophysiological experiments testing the hypotheses that: 1) mating status and 2) age affect behavioural and antennal response of the parasitoid wasp, Microplitis croceipes to host-related plant odors. Both synthetic and authentic host ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Stelinski L. Reviewer Report For: Do age and mating status affect olfactory response of the parasitoid, Microplitis croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to host-related plant odors? [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2018, 7:1817 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.18508.r40848)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 18 Dec 2018
    Tolulope Morawo, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, 36849, USA
    18 Dec 2018
    Author Response
    We thank the reviewer for the comments on the manuscript.
    Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 18 Dec 2018
    Tolulope Morawo, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, 36849, USA
    18 Dec 2018
    Author Response
    We thank the reviewer for the comments on the manuscript.
    Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 20 Nov 2018
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.