Phytochemical and antioxidant activity evaluation of the bark of Tampoi (<i>Baccaurea macrocarpa</i>)

Erwin Erwin; Widar Ristiyani Pusparohmana; Indah Permata Sari; Rita Hairani; Usman Usman

doi:10.12688/f1000research.16643.1

Home Browse Phytochemical and antioxidant activity evaluation of the bark of Tampoi...

ALL Metrics

Views

Downloads

Get PDF

Get XML

Export

▬

✚

Research Article

Phytochemical and antioxidant activity evaluation of the bark of Tampoi (Baccaurea macrocarpa)

[version 1; peer review: 3 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]

Erwin Erwin ¹, Widar Ristiyani Pusparohmana¹, Indah Permata Sari¹, Rita Hairani¹, Usman Usman²

Erwin Erwin ¹, Widar Ristiyani Pusparohmana¹, [...] Indah Permata Sari¹, Rita Hairani¹, Usman Usman²

PUBLISHED 24 Dec 2018

Author details Author details

¹ Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Mulawarman University, Samarinda, East Kalimantan, 75123, Indonesia
² Study Program of Chemical Education, Faculty of Teacher Trainer and Education, Samarinda, East Kalimantan, 75242, Indonesia

Erwin Erwin
Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Widar Ristiyani Pusparohmana
Roles: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology

Indah Permata Sari
Roles: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology

Rita Hairani
Roles: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Usman Usman
Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology

OPEN PEER REVIEW

REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the ICTROPS 2018 collection.

Abstract

Background: Tampoi (Baccaurea macrocarpa) is a tropical rainforest plant that produces edible fruit and is native to Southeast Asia, especially East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Previous research showed that Tampoi potentially can be developed as a drug. It was reported that the extract of Tampoi fruit displayed antioxidant activity, which was correlated with its phenolic and flavonoid substances. There is no information about the antioxidant activity of other parts of this plant, such as the bark, which might also have this kind of activity. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the phytochemical, toxicity, and antioxidant activity of the bark of Tampoi.
Methods: The bark of Tampoi was extracted with methanol and concentrated using rotary evaporator to obtain the methanol extract of the bark. Secondary metabolites of this extract was determined using phytochemical analysis. Afterward, the methanol extract was tested for its toxicity using brine shrimp lethality test and antioxidant activity using the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl method.
Results: Phytochemical evaluation results showed that the methanol extract of bark of this plant contains several secondary metabolites including alkaloids, flavonoids, phenolics, steroids, and triterpenoids. The toxicity test displayed no toxic property due to a LC₅₀value above 1000 ppm. For antioxidant activity, the result exhibited that the methanol extract of bark of this plant could be categorized as an active extract with IC₅₀ value of 11.15 ppm. Moreover, based on gas chromatography-mass spectrometer analysis, there are 37 isolated compounds from the bark, one of which is methylparaben, a phenolic predicted to act as an antioxidant.
Conclusion: The results obtained in this research demonstrated that the bark of Tampoi (B. macrocarpa) has potential as an antioxidant.

Keywords

Tampoi, Baccaurea macrocarpa, toxicity, BSLT, antioxidant, DPPH

Corresponding author: Erwin Erwin

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information: The authors acknowledge funding from the Islamic Development Bank (IsDB) project in the frame of Hibah Penelitian PIU IDB for Lecturer Mulawarman University 2018 Number: 2248/UN17.11/PL/2018.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Copyright: © 2018 Erwin E et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

How to cite: Erwin E, Pusparohmana WR, Sari IP et al. Phytochemical and antioxidant activity evaluation of the bark of Tampoi (Baccaurea macrocarpa) [version 1; peer review: 3 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2018, 7:1977 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16643.1) First published: 24 Dec 2018, 7:1977 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16643.1) Latest published: 12 Dec 2019, 7:1977 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16643.2)

Introduction

Indonesia is a mega-diverse country in terms of biodiversity that is flanked by the Indian and Pacific Oceans. Indonesia's biodiversity encompasses the diversity of living things both on land and sea¹. Indonesia, especially East Kalimantan, has very extensive tropical rainforest, which is a habitat for much biodiversity. Various types of plants have long been utilized by the community as traditional medicines. The utilization of natural products as an alternative medicine is increasing because natural ingredients are believed to be safer than synthetic substances, i.e. do not contain chemicals that only can be found in modern medicines, which are linked to toxicity².

Among plants, the genus of Baccaurea have interesting biological activities. For example, B. angulata has been reported as a potential functional food with effective antioxidant³, anti-inflammatory, anti-atherogenic, and hypocholesteromia activities⁴. Other research has also investigated the biological activity of other species of this genus, i.e. B. lanceolata and B. macrocarpa. It was reported that the fruits of B. macrocarpa exhibited the highest antioxidant activity compared with B. lanceolata, which significantly correlated with the phenolic and flavonoid contents⁵.

B. macrocarpa is one of the typical plants of East Kalimantan, Indonesia and the edible fruits is a source of additional nutrients and known as Tampoi. Until now, the information about the antioxidant activity of other parts of this plant such as the bark of Tampoi has not been reported yet. Hence, the present research was conducted to investigate the phytochemical, toxicity, and antioxidant activity of the bark of Tampoi (B. macrocarpa). Furthermore, the gas chromatography-mass spectrometer (GC-MS) analysis was performed to obtain information about the kinds of isolated compounds contained.

Methods

Extraction

Extraction was carried out as described previously by Erwin et al. (2014)⁶. The bark of Tampoi (B. macrocarpa) was dried for 1 week at room temperature and ground to a powder. The powder was extracted using a maceration method by soaking in methanol for 24 hours at room temperature, which was repeated three times. Afterwards, the extract solution was filtered by filter paper and the solvent was evaporated under vacuum using a rotary evaporator (Buchi R II) at 45°C and 1 atm, to obtain the methanol extract of bark of Tampoi.

Phytochemical evaluation

Phytochemical evaluation was performed to investigate the secondary metabolites contents of the methanol extract of bark of Tampoi (B. macrocarpa), including alkaloids, flavonoids, phenolics, steroids, triterpenoids, and saponins, as described previously⁷. The presence of secondary metabolites were identified by observing the changing color of the extract. These evaluations were performed as follows:

Alkaloids. 1 mg of extract was inserted into a test tube and then diluted in 1 mL methanol. Then a few drops of H₂SO₄ 1M was added. Afterwards, a few drops of Dragendorff reagent was added into the mixture. The formation of orange on filter paper indicated the presence of alkaloids.

Flavonoids. 1 mg of extract was inserted into a test tube and diluted in 1 mL methanol. A few 2 mg of Magnesium powder was added followed by a few drops of concentrated HCl. The presence of flavonoids was identified by the formation of pink or red color.

Phenolics. 1 mg of extract was introduced into a test tube and dissolved in methanol. Then a few drops of 1% FeCl₃ were inserted. The formation of green, red, purple, dark blue or black indicated the presence of phenolics.

Steroids and triterpenoids. 1 mL of methanol and 1 mg of extract were inserted into a test tube, stirred until homogeneous, then 2 drops of anhydride acetate and 1 drop of H₂SO₄ were added (Liebermann Burchard reagent). The formation of green or purple precipitation showed a sample containing steroids, and red precipitation displayed the presence of terpenoids.

Saponins. 1 mg extract was put into a test tube and then dissolved in distilled water, and shaken strongly. The presence of saponins is characterized by the formation of durable foam on the surface of the liquid. Foam that remains stable after the addition of a few drops of concentrated HCl indicated the presence of saponins.

Toxicity test

The toxicity test of extract was performed using brine shrimp lethality test (BSLT), as described previously⁸. Methanol extract of bark of Tampoi (B. macrocarpa) (1 mg) was dissolved using 100 µL of 1% DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) and homogenized. The samples were diluted using 150 µL of distilled water until the total of volume reached 250 µL, and then pipetted 200 µL and diluted again using 600 µL of distilled water until the total of volume was 800 µL, so that the sample concentration was 1000 ppm. Samples with a concentration of 500, 250, 125, 62.5, 31.2, 15.6, and 7.8 ppm were made from sample dilutions of a concentration of 1000 ppm. The control solution was made with the same treatment as the sample without the addition of extract.

The toxicity test was carried out using several standard micro plates. About 100 µL seawater containing 8-13 shrimp larvae was added to each diluted sample so that the sample volume was 200 µL (with a concentration of 500, 250, 125, 62.5, 31.2, 15.6, and 7.8 ppm). The number of dead shrimp larvae was calculated for 24 hours after treatment. Each sample was treated in triplicate. The data obtained was recorded and the value of LC₅₀ calculated (Lethal Concentration 50%) using SAS Probit analysis.

Antioxidant assay

The antioxidant activity of the extract was evaluated using 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging method, as described previously^7,9–11. Briefly, the extract of bark of Tampoi (B. macrocarpa) was prepared in a solution with a concentration of 25, 50, 75 and 100 ppm, respectively. 1 mL of extract and 1 mL of DPPH (0.024 mg/mL) were put into a test tube, which was incubated for 30 min at 37°C before being measured by Spectrophotometer UV Thermo Scientific Evolution 201 (measurements were carried out at a wavelength of 515 nm). Vitamin C was used as a positive control with variations in concentration were 2, 4, 6, and 8 ppm, respectively. Determination of antioxidant activity or DPPH scavenging effect (%) of extract and vitamin C were carried out in triplicate using equation as follow.

p e r c e n t a g e o f a n t i o x i d a n t a c t i v i t y = \frac{A b s o r b a n c e o f b l a n k - A b s o r b a n c e o f s a m p l e}{A b s o r b a n c e o f b l a n k} \times 100 %

Then, the value of IC₅₀ (Inhibitory Concentration 50%) was determined using linear regression.

GC-MS analysis

In order to obtain the information of the kinds of compounds in methanol extract of bark of Tampoi, an analysis using GC-MS 5977 was performed. Specification of column that used in this research was HP-5MS with length 30 m, diameter 0.25 mm, thick of film 0.25 µm. The identification of the compound was compared to NIST standard data (https://webbook.nist.gov).

Results

The secondary metabolites found in the methanol extract of the bark of Tampoi (B. macrocarpa) are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Phytochemical evaluation of the methanol extract of bark of Tampoi (Baccaurea macrocarpa).

Secondary metabolites	Bark
Alkaloids	+
Steroids	+
Triterpenoids	+
Flavonoids	+
Phenolics	+
Saponins	˗

(+): Presence; (-): Absence

To evaluate the antioxidant activity of the methanol extract of the bark, DPPH method was performed. The results of the antioxidant test can be seen in Table 2.

Table 2. Antioxidant activity of the methanol extract of bark of Tampoi (Baccaurea macrocarpa).

Average of three replicates performed for each concentration.

Sample	Concentration (ppm)	Absorbance		Inhibition	Percentage of inhibition (%)	IC₅₀ (ppm)
Sample	Concentration (ppm)	Sample	Blank	Inhibition	Percentage of inhibition (%)	IC₅₀ (ppm)
Bark	20	0.2190	0.4150	0.47229	47.229	11.15
	40	0.0560		0.88193	88.193
	60	0.0490		0.86506	86.506
	75	0.0305		0.92651	92.651
Vitamin C	2	0.5470	0.6700	0.18360	18.360	3.28
	4	0.1530		0.77160	77.160
	6	0.0450		0.93280	93.280
	8	0.0340		0.94930	94.930

Furthermore, the methanol extract was analyzed using GC-MS analysis. The chromatogram and it compound contents of this extract is shown in Figure 1 and Table 3, respectively.

Figure 1. GC chromatogram of methanol extract of bark of Tampoi (Baccaurea macrocarpa).

Table 3. Composition of compounds from methanol extract of bark of Tampoi (B. macrocarpa).

Peak	Retention Time (min)	% Peak Area	Molecule Formula	Molecular Weight	Compounds
1	9.467	0.76	C₈H₈O₃	152	Methylparaben
2	14.877	1.32	C₁₄H₂₆	194	Cyclohexane, 1-(cyclohexylmethyl)-2-methyl-, cis
3	19.329	0.91	C₁₇H₃₄O₂	270.	Methyl palmitate
4	20.034	16.14	C₁₆H₃₂O₂	256	palmitic acid
5	20.227	0.72	C₁₆H₃₂O₂	256	palmitic acid
6	20.300	3.08	C₃₄H₆₅F₃O₂	562	Dotriacontyl trifluoroacetate
7	20.432	3.18	C₃₄H₆₅F₃O₂	562	Tricosyl trifluoroacetate
8	21.234	1.40	C₁₈H₃₆O₂	284	Methyl 7-methylhexadecanoate
9	22.479	0.04	C₁₉H₃₄O₂	294	9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-, methyl ester
10	22.597	8.46	C₁₉H₃₆O₂	296	9-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester
11	22.811	0.62	C₂₉H₆₀O	424	Eicosyl nonyl ether
12	23.069	7.05	C₁₉H₃₈O₂	298	Heptadecanoic acid, 16-methyl, methyl ester
13	23.334	3.34		336	Undec-10-ynoic acid, undecyl ester
14	23.431	0.29	C₁₈H₃₂O	264	9,17-Octadecadienal, (Z)-
15	23.485	0.07	C₂₄H₄₈O₂Si	396	cis-Vaccenic acid
16	23.730	1.19	C₁₈H₃₄O₂	282	Oleic Acid
17	23.774	1.15	C₁₅H₂₄O	220	(2S,3S,6S)-6-Isopropyl-3-methyl-2-(prop-1-en-2- yl)-3-vinylcyclohexan one
18	23.794	0.78	C₁₅H₂₈	208	7-Pentadecyne
19	24.592	0.67	C₁₈H₃₅ClO₂	318	2- Chloropropionic acid, pentadecyl ester
20	26.520	2.77	C₂₁H₄₂O₂	326	Methyl 18-methylnonadecanoate
22	26.733	3.58	C₂₀H₄₂	282	Eicosane
23	27.207	0.87	C₃₆H₆₅F₇O₂	662	Dotriacontyl heptafluorobutyrate
24	27.255	0.08	C₅₄H₁₀₈Br₂	917	Tetrapentacontane, 1,54-dibromo-
25	28.234	0.74	C₂₈H₅₈	394	Octacosane
26	28.286	1.48	C₄₇H₉₄	659	Pentatriacontane, 13-docosenylidene-
27	28.374	2.31	C₁₉H₃₆	264	1H-Indene, 5-butyl-6-hexyloctahydro-
28	28.403	2.33	C₂₁H₃₉F₃O₂	380	Nonadecyl trifluoroacetate
29	28.941	1.68	C₂₉H₅₂	400	Nonacos-1-ene
30	28.963	0.31	C₂₂H₄₁F₃O₂	394	Eicosyl trifluoroacetate
31	28.980	0.34	C₂₃H₄₆	322	9-Tricosene, (Z)-
32	29.192	1.32	C₁₈H₃₆	252	1-Octadecene
33	29.224	1.10	C₂₆H₅₂	364	1-Hexacosene
34	29.708	7.09	C₂₃H₄₆O₂	354	Methyl 20-methyl-heneicosanoate
35	29.829	0.10	C₁₈H₃₆	252	1-Octadecene
36	29.878	0.29	C₂₉H₅₂	400	Nonacos-1-ene
37	29.907	0.28	C₃₅H₇₀	490	17-Pentatriacontene

Dataset 1.Dataset 1. Sheet 1, raw data of the results of phytochemical evaluation for alkaloids, flavonoids, phenolics, steroids, triterpenoids, and saponins by observing the changing of colors; Sheet 2, raw data of the observation of the mortality numbers of Artemia salina Leach and calculation of LC50 value in toxicity test using brine shrimp lethality test; Sheet 3, raw data for antioxidant activity by DPPH method, including the measurement of absorbance using spectrophotometer in triplicate, the calculation of percentage of antioxidant activity, and the value of IC50; Sheet 4, raw data of GC-MS analysis.

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.16643.d227222

Discussion

Based on the phytochemical evaluation, the results showed that the methanol extract of bark of Tampoi (B. macrocarpa) contains several secondary metabolites including alkaloids, flavonoids, phenolics, steroids, and triterpenoids. Several secondary metabolites including alkaloids, steroids, triterpenoids, flavonoids, and phenolics are known to have antioxidant properties. These antioxidant compounds wield their activities through different mechanisms, for example by inhibiting hydrogen abstraction, radical scavenging, binding transition metal ions, disintegrating peroxides^12,13, and one of the most important factors influencing antioxidant activity is the ability of the compounds to donate electrons.

Furthermore, in the present study the antioxidant activity of the Tampoi extract was determined by DPPH method. This method was used because it is simple, efficient, quick, more practical, and relatively inexpensive¹⁴. Based on Table 2, it is known that the methanol extract of bark of Tampoi (B. macrocarpa) can be categorized as an active extract in an antioxidant assay with IC₅₀ value of 11.15 ppm. In addition, the results of the toxicity test using the BSLT method showed that the extract was toxic because it displayed LC₅₀ value above 1000 ppm.

According to the results of GC-MS analysis, the chromatogram showed 37 peaks (compounds). The profile of the compounds showed that the main components were fatty acids and fatty acid esters. Total content of unsaturated fatty acids and esters with a peak area of 12.15% including 9,12-octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-, methyl ester (peak area 0.04), 9-octadecenoic acid, methyl ester (peak area 8.46), undec-10-ynoic acid, undecyl ester (peak area 3.58), undec-10-ynoic acid, undecyl ester (peak area 3.346), cis-vaccenic acid (peak area 0.07), and oleic acid (peak area 0.19). It was been reported that unsaturated fatty acid compounds and unsaturated fatty acid esters have significant antioxidant properties^15–17.

It can be seen that only a small part of those are aromatic compounds. However, aromatic compounds are compounds that have the ability to stabilize high free radicals. The mechanism of phenolics as antioxidants is started by the formation a bond between free radical (DPPH radical) and hydrogen atom from OH-phenolics (ArOH) to form ArO^.radical. Hydrogen atom will easier to be released because of the presence of electron withdrawing group which is bound at ortho- or para- positions¹⁸. Furthermore, ArO will react with a radical (ArO^. or other radical) to form a stable compound^19,20.

DPPH^.+ AOH → DPPH-H + ArO^.

DPPH^. + ArO^. → DPPH-OAr or DPPH^. + R^. → DPPH-R

According to identification of the compound in the methanol extract of bark of Tampoi (B. macrocarpa) using NIST database (DRUGBANK accession number, DB14212), it is known that the compound is identified as methylparaben. Based on the NIST database, peak at retention time at 9.467 min and peak area of 0.76% showed the characteristic of methylparaben (Molecular formula=C₈H₈O₃; Molecular weight=152).

It has been reported that methylparaben does not show negative effects on male mouse reproduction²¹. Methylparaben is widely used as a preservative in cosmetic products, medicines or pharmaceutical products and food ingredients^22,23, and the antibacterial activity of methylparaben is stronger than benzoate acid²⁴.

Methylparaben is a phenolic group that can reduce free radicals because it contains aromatic groups, -OH clusters and carbonyl groups. The presence of –COOCH₃ substituent at para- position in methylparaben makes this compound act as an electron withdrawing group. The bond dissociation energy (BDE) of the O–H bond is a main factor to investigate the action of antioxidant, due to the weaker OH bond the reaction of the free radical will be easier¹⁹. As the prediction of the previous reaction mechanism^7,19, the prediction of the reaction mechanism between DPPH radical and methyl paraben can be seen in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Prediction of DPPH radical scavenging mechanism by methylparaben.

Conclusion

The results of the study showed that the bark of Tampoi (Baccaurea macrocarpa) has antioxidant activity with an IC₅₀ value of 11.15 ppm.

Data availability

F1000Research: Dataset 1. Sheet 1, raw data of the results of phytochemical evaluation for alkaloids, flavonoids, phenolics, steroids, triterpenoids, and saponins by observing the changing of colors; Sheet 2, raw data of the observation of the mortality numbers of Artemia salina Leach and calculation of LC50 value in toxicity test using brine shrimp lethality test; Sheet 3, raw data for antioxidant activity by DPPH method, including the measurement of absorbance using spectrophotometer in triplicate, the calculation of percentage of antioxidant activity, and the value of IC50; Sheet 4, raw data of GC-MS analysis., https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.16643.d227222²⁵

Grant information

The authors acknowledge funding from the Islamic Development Bank (IsDB) project in the frame of Hibah Penelitian PIU IDB for Lecturer Mulawarman University 2018 Number: 2248/UN17.11/PL/2018.

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the IsDB project for providing financial support and Head of Plant Anatomy and Systematic Laboratory of Biology Department, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences of Mulawarman University for identification the specimen.

Faculty Opinions recommended

References

1. Yuwono A: The Fifth National Report of Indonesia to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Ministry of Environment and Forestry of Indonesia. 2014. Reference Source
2. Hussin AHJ: Adverse Effect of Herbs and Drug-Herbal Interactions. Malaysian Journal of Pharmacy. 2001; 1(2): 39–44. Reference Source
3. Ibrahim D, Hazali N, Jauhari N, et al.: Physicochemical and Antioxidant Characteristics of Baccaurea angulata Fruit Juice Extract. Afr J Biotechnol. 2013; 12(34): 5333–5338. Publisher Full Text
4. Ibrahim M, Ahmed IA, Mikail MA, et al.: Baccaurea angulata fruit juice reduces atherosclerotic lesions in diet-induced Hypercholesterolemic rabbits. Lipids Health Dis. 2017; 16(1): 134. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
5. Bakar MF, Ahmad AN, Karim FA, et al.: Phytochemicals and Antioxidative Properties of Borneo Indigenous Liposu (Baccaurea lanceolata) and Tampoi (Baccaurea macrocarpa) Fruits. Antioxidants (Basel). 2014; 3(3): 516–525. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
6. Erwin, Noor A, Soekamto NH, et al.: Waltherione C and Cleomiscosin from Melochia umbellata var. Degrabrata K. (Malvaceae), Biosynthetic and Chemotaxonomic Significance. Biochem Syst Ecol. 2014; 55: 358–361. Publisher Full Text
7. Erwin, Nisa RN, Daniel: Phytochemical Test, Toxicity and Antioxidant Activity Leaves Kerehau (Callicarpa longifolia Lam.) with DPPH Method. Indonesia Chimica Acta. 2015; 8(1): 52–59. Reference Source
8. Meyer BN, Ferrighi NR, Putnam JE, et al.: Brine shrimp: a convenient general bioassay for active plant constituents. Planta Med. 1982; 45(5): 31–34. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
9. Erwin: Phytocemical Analysis and Antioxidant Activity of the Wood Ethanolic Extract of Sirih Hutan (Piper aduncum). Indonesia Chimica Acta. 2015; 8(20): 11–16. Reference Source
10. Anokwah D, Mensah AY, Amponsah IK, et al.: Anti-inflammatory, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of the Stem Bark of Psydrax subcordata. Der Pharmacia Lettre. 2016; 8(20): 21–28. Reference Source
11. Borkataky M: Antioxidant Activity, Total Phenolic Content and Total Flavonoid Content of Perilla ocymoides Linn. Der Pharmacia Lettre. 2015; 7(5): 69–72. Reference Source
12. Diplock AT: Will the 'good fairies' please prove to us that vitamin E lessens human degenerative disease? Free Radic Res. 1997; 27(5): 511–532. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
13. Prior RL, Wu X, Schaich K: Standardized methods for the determination of antioxidant capacity and phenolics in foods and dietary supplements. J Agric Food Chem. 2005; 53(10): 4290–4302. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
14. Akar Z, Küçük M, Doğan H: A new colorimetric DPPH^• scavenging activity method with no need for a spectrophotometer applied on synthetic and natural antioxidants and medicinal herbs. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2017; 32(1): 640–647. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
15. Elagbar ZA, Naik RR, Shakya AK, et al.: Fatty Acids Analysis, Antioxidant and Biological Activity of Fixed Oil of Annona muricata L. Seeds. J Chem. 2016; 1–6, 6948098. Publisher Full Text
16. Perona JS, Archemis C, Ruiz-Gutierrez V, et al.: Effect of dietary high-oleic-acid oils that are rich in antioxidants on microsomal lipid peroxidation in rats. J Agric Food Chem. 2005; 53(3): 730–735. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
17. Pintato MEA, Araújo SG, Morais MI, et al.: Antifungal and antioxidant activity of fatty acid methyl esters from vegetable oils. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2017; 89(3): 1671–1681. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
18. Bendary E, Francis RR, Ali HMG, et al.: Antioxidant and Structure–Activity Relationships (SARs) of Some Phenolic and Anilines Compounds. Annals of Agricultural Science. 2013; 58(2): 173–181. Publisher Full Text
19. Brand-Willians W, Cuvelier ME, Berset C: Use of a free radical Method to Evaluate Antioxidant Activity. LWT - Food Sci Technol. 1995; 28(1): 25–30. Publisher Full Text
20. Villaño D, Fernández-Pachón MS, Moyá ML, et al.: Radical scavenging ability of polyphenolic compounds towards DPPH free radical. Talanta. 2007; 71(1): 230–235. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
21. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP): Reflection Paper on the Use of Methyl- and PropylParaben as Excipients in Human Medicinal Products for Oral Use. European Medicines Agency Science Medicines Health. 2015; 1–13. Reference Source
22. Macy E, Schatz M, Zeiger RS: Immediate Hypersensitivity to Methylparaben Causing False-Positive Results of Local Anesthetic Skin Testing or Provocative Dose Testing. Perm J. 2002; 6(4): 17–21. Free Full Text
23. Micea MM, Lupşa IR, Cinghiţă DF, et al.: Determination of Methylparaben from Cosmetic Products by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography. J Serb Chem Soc. 2009; 74(6): 669–676. Publisher Full Text
24. Mirsonbol SZ, Issazadeh K, Pahlaviani MRMK, et al.: Antimicrobial Efficacy of the Methylparaben and Benzoate Sodium against Selected Standard Microorganisms, Clinical and Environmental Isolates In Vitro. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences. 2014; 4(S4): 363–367. Reference Source
25. Erwin E, Pusparohmana WR, Sari IP, et al.: Dataset 1 in: Phytochemical and antioxidant activity evaluation of the bark of Tampoi (Baccaurea macrocarpa). F1000Research. 2018. http://www.doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.16643.d227222

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2

VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 24 Dec 2018

Author details Author details

Erwin Erwin
Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Widar Ristiyani Pusparohmana
Roles: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology

Indah Permata Sari
Roles: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology

Rita Hairani
Roles: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Usman Usman
Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology

Competing interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information

The authors acknowledge funding from the Islamic Development Bank (IsDB) project in the frame of Hibah Penelitian PIU IDB for Lecturer Mulawarman University 2018 Number: 2248/UN17.11/PL/2018.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Article Versions (2)

version 2

Revised

Published: 12 Dec 2019, 7:1977

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16643.2

version 1

Published: 24 Dec 2018, 7:1977

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16643.1

© 2018 Erwin E et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

Download

Export To

metrics

	Views	Downloads
F1000Research	-	-
PubMed Central Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.	-	-

Citations

SEE MORE DETAILS

CITE

how to cite this article

Erwin E, Pusparohmana WR, Sari IP et al. Phytochemical and antioxidant activity evaluation of the bark of Tampoi (Baccaurea macrocarpa) [version 1; peer review: 3 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2018, 7:1977 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16643.1)

NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

track

receive updates on this article

Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?

Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE

ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested

Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.

Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Version 1

VERSION 1

PUBLISHED 24 Dec 2018

Views

Reviewer Report 15 Nov 2019

Chanya Chaicharoenpong, Institute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Molecular Crop Research Unit, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

Approved with Reservations

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.18189.r56216

This manuscript reported the new information of phytochemical and antioxidant activity of barks of Baccaurea macrocarpa.

The authors used only DPPH assay to evaluate antioxidant activity. Antioxidant activity should be investigated using various assays to present antioxidant capacity of the extracts.

The results of evaluation on phytochemicals of barks of B. macrocarpa showed that the methanol extract consisted of alkaloids, steroids, triterpenoids, flavonoids and phenolic compounds. But the profile of GC-MS showed only fatty acids, fatty acid esters and methyl paraben. The authors should use LC-MS to investigate chemical constituents of methanol extract instead of GC-MS.

In results section, the authors did not mention on the toxicity test of the extract using brine shrimp lethality test. And the results should express yours statistical analysis.

In discussion section, the third paragraph, the authors need to rewrite the total content and composition of fatty acids. GC chromatogram in Figure 1 was not related to the data of composition of compounds in Table 3 such as retention time, % peak area. For example, peak at retention time 19.329 showed high intensity on GC chromatogram but it expressed low % peak area just 0.91. The peak at retention time 14.877 showed low intensity on GC chromatogram but it expressed % peak area 1.32. Moreover, some compounds presented low matching percentage from the library searching. In Figure 2, structure of methyl paraben was wrong.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Natural Product Chemistry.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

CITE

Report a concern

Author Response 12 Dec 2019

erwin erwin, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Mulawarman University, Samarinda, 75123, Indonesia

12 Dec 2019

Author Response

Reviewer comment #1
The authors used only DPPH assay to evaluate antioxidant activity. The antioxidant activity should be investigated using various assays to present antioxidant capacity of the extracts. The results of ... Continue reading Reviewer comment #1
The authors used only DPPH assay to evaluate antioxidant activity. The antioxidant activity should be investigated using various assays to present antioxidant capacity of the extracts. The results of evaluation on phytochemical of barks of B. macrocarpa showed that the methanol extract consisted of alkaloids, steroids, triterpenoids, flavonoids and phenolic compounds. But the profile of GC-MS showed only fatty acids, fatty acid esters and methyl paraben. The authors should use LC-MS to investigate chemical constituents of methanol extract instead of GC-MS.

Author response #1
This study is an initial screening of the antioxidant activity of Tampoi bark. The next project if we get the funding, we will use another antioxidant test and other instruments as you suggest. We will also carry out isolation and purification to obtain active compounds from Tampoi bark. Thank you for your valuable suggestion

Reviewer comment #2
In the results section, the authors did not mention on the toxicity test of the extract using brine shrimp lethality test. And the results should express your statistical analysis

Author response #2
Toxicity test data have been added in the revised article

Reviewer comment #3
some compounds presented low matching percentage from the library searching

Author response #3
It has been fixed

Reviewer comment #4
In Figure 2, the structure of methylparaben was wrong.

Author response #4
The structure of methylparaben has been fixed

Reviewer comment #5
In the discussion section, the third paragraph, the authors need to rewrite the total content and composition of fatty acids. GC chromatogram in Figure 1 was not related to the data of composition of compounds in Table 3 such as retention time, % peak area. For example, peak at retention time 19.329 showed high intensity on GC chromatogram but it expressed a low % peak area just 0.91. The peak at retention time 14.877 showed low intensity on GC chromatogram but it expressed % peak area 1.32.

Author response #5
The percentage (%) peak area of GC chromatogram has been fixed
Reviewer comment #1
The authors used only DPPH assay to evaluate antioxidant activity. The antioxidant activity should be investigated using various assays to present antioxidant capacity of the extracts. The results of evaluation on phytochemical of barks of B. macrocarpa showed that the methanol extract consisted of alkaloids, steroids, triterpenoids, flavonoids and phenolic compounds. But the profile of GC-MS showed only fatty acids, fatty acid esters and methyl paraben. The authors should use LC-MS to investigate chemical constituents of methanol extract instead of GC-MS.

Author response #1
This study is an initial screening of the antioxidant activity of Tampoi bark. The next project if we get the funding, we will use another antioxidant test and other instruments as you suggest. We will also carry out isolation and purification to obtain active compounds from Tampoi bark. Thank you for your valuable suggestion

Reviewer comment #2
In the results section, the authors did not mention on the toxicity test of the extract using brine shrimp lethality test. And the results should express your statistical analysis

Author response #2
Toxicity test data have been added in the revised article

Reviewer comment #3
some compounds presented low matching percentage from the library searching

Author response #3
It has been fixed

Reviewer comment #4
In Figure 2, the structure of methylparaben was wrong.

Author response #4
The structure of methylparaben has been fixed

Reviewer comment #5
In the discussion section, the third paragraph, the authors need to rewrite the total content and composition of fatty acids. GC chromatogram in Figure 1 was not related to the data of composition of compounds in Table 3 such as retention time, % peak area. For example, peak at retention time 19.329 showed high intensity on GC chromatogram but it expressed a low % peak area just 0.91. The peak at retention time 14.877 showed low intensity on GC chromatogram but it expressed % peak area 1.32.

Author response #5
The percentage (%) peak area of GC chromatogram has been fixed
Competing Interests: no competing interests Close
Report a concern
Respond or Comment

COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT

Author Response 12 Dec 2019

erwin erwin, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Mulawarman University, Samarinda, 75123, Indonesia

12 Dec 2019

Author Response

Reviewer comment #1
The authors used only DPPH assay to evaluate antioxidant activity. The antioxidant activity should be investigated using various assays to present antioxidant capacity of the extracts. The results of ... Continue reading Reviewer comment #1
The authors used only DPPH assay to evaluate antioxidant activity. The antioxidant activity should be investigated using various assays to present antioxidant capacity of the extracts. The results of evaluation on phytochemical of barks of B. macrocarpa showed that the methanol extract consisted of alkaloids, steroids, triterpenoids, flavonoids and phenolic compounds. But the profile of GC-MS showed only fatty acids, fatty acid esters and methyl paraben. The authors should use LC-MS to investigate chemical constituents of methanol extract instead of GC-MS.

Author response #1
This study is an initial screening of the antioxidant activity of Tampoi bark. The next project if we get the funding, we will use another antioxidant test and other instruments as you suggest. We will also carry out isolation and purification to obtain active compounds from Tampoi bark. Thank you for your valuable suggestion

Reviewer comment #2
In the results section, the authors did not mention on the toxicity test of the extract using brine shrimp lethality test. And the results should express your statistical analysis

Author response #2
Toxicity test data have been added in the revised article

Reviewer comment #3
some compounds presented low matching percentage from the library searching

Author response #3
It has been fixed

Reviewer comment #4
In Figure 2, the structure of methylparaben was wrong.

Author response #4
The structure of methylparaben has been fixed

Reviewer comment #5
In the discussion section, the third paragraph, the authors need to rewrite the total content and composition of fatty acids. GC chromatogram in Figure 1 was not related to the data of composition of compounds in Table 3 such as retention time, % peak area. For example, peak at retention time 19.329 showed high intensity on GC chromatogram but it expressed a low % peak area just 0.91. The peak at retention time 14.877 showed low intensity on GC chromatogram but it expressed % peak area 1.32.

Author response #5
The percentage (%) peak area of GC chromatogram has been fixed
Reviewer comment #1
The authors used only DPPH assay to evaluate antioxidant activity. The antioxidant activity should be investigated using various assays to present antioxidant capacity of the extracts. The results of evaluation on phytochemical of barks of B. macrocarpa showed that the methanol extract consisted of alkaloids, steroids, triterpenoids, flavonoids and phenolic compounds. But the profile of GC-MS showed only fatty acids, fatty acid esters and methyl paraben. The authors should use LC-MS to investigate chemical constituents of methanol extract instead of GC-MS.

Author response #1
This study is an initial screening of the antioxidant activity of Tampoi bark. The next project if we get the funding, we will use another antioxidant test and other instruments as you suggest. We will also carry out isolation and purification to obtain active compounds from Tampoi bark. Thank you for your valuable suggestion

Reviewer comment #2
In the results section, the authors did not mention on the toxicity test of the extract using brine shrimp lethality test. And the results should express your statistical analysis

Author response #2
Toxicity test data have been added in the revised article

Reviewer comment #3
some compounds presented low matching percentage from the library searching

Author response #3
It has been fixed

Reviewer comment #4
In Figure 2, the structure of methylparaben was wrong.

Author response #4
The structure of methylparaben has been fixed

Reviewer comment #5
In the discussion section, the third paragraph, the authors need to rewrite the total content and composition of fatty acids. GC chromatogram in Figure 1 was not related to the data of composition of compounds in Table 3 such as retention time, % peak area. For example, peak at retention time 19.329 showed high intensity on GC chromatogram but it expressed a low % peak area just 0.91. The peak at retention time 14.877 showed low intensity on GC chromatogram but it expressed % peak area 1.32.

Author response #5
The percentage (%) peak area of GC chromatogram has been fixed
Competing Interests: no competing interests Close
Report a concern

Views

Reviewer Report 11 Nov 2019

Agustono Wibowo, Faculty Applied Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Pahang Darul Makmur, Malaysia

Approved with Reservations

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.18189.r56219

Introduction:

In first paragraph line 5, please correct your statement on natural ingredients “do not contain chemicals” that only can be found in modern medicines, as all things in this world is formed from chemical constituents. Please

Introduction:

In first paragraph line 5, please correct your statement on natural ingredients “do not contain chemicals” that only can be found in modern medicines, as all things in this world is formed from chemical constituents. Please change to “contain toxic chemicals”.
Last paragraph line 5, the statement “kinds of isolated compounds contained” are not correct as you don’t isolate the compound. Please remove the word “isolated”.

Methods:

DDPH assay alone can’t express the antioxidant properties of sample, so we suggest you to add other antioxidant assay such as ABTS and FRAP.

Discussion:

GCMS result indicated that the main constituent in Baccaurea macrocarpa extract is fatty acid, this is because the GCMS can only detect the volatile compounds. To identify other compounds that are responsible in the antioxidant activity of Baccaurea macrocarpa, we suggest you to run your sample using LCMS.
Methylparaben is familiar compound. Can you give literature which supported your claim that methylparaben is responsible to the antioxidant of Baccaurea macrocarpa extract?

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Natural Product Chemistry and Organic Synthesis

CITE

Report a concern

Author Response 12 Dec 2019

erwin erwin, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Mulawarman University, Samarinda, 75123, Indonesia

12 Dec 2019

Author Response

Reviewer comments #1
In first paragraph line 5, please correct your statement on natural ingredients “do not contain chemicals” that only can be found in modern medicines, as all things in this ... Continue reading Reviewer comments #1
In first paragraph line 5, please correct your statement on natural ingredients “do not contain chemicals” that only can be found in modern medicines, as all things in this world is formed from chemical constituents. Please change to “contain toxic chemicals”

Author response #1
Thank you for your suggestion, It has been fixed

Reviewer comments #2
The statement “kinds of isolated compounds contained” are not correct as you don’t isolate the compound. Please remove the word “isolated”

Author response #2
The word isolated has been removed

Reviewer comments #3
Methods:
DPPH assay alone can’t express the antioxidant properties of the sample, so we suggest you add other antioxidant assays as ABTS and FRAP

Author response #3
This study is an initial screening of the antioxidant activity of Tampoi bark.

Reviewer comments #4
Discussion:
GCMS result indicated that the main constituent in Baccaurea macrocarpa extract is a fatty acid, this is because the GCMS can only detect the volatile compounds. To identify other compounds that are responsible for the antioxidant activity of Baccaurea macrocarpa, we suggest you to run your sample using LCMS.

Author response #4
The next project if we get the funding, we will use another antioxidant test and other instruments as you suggest. We will also carry out isolation and purification to obtain active compounds from Tampoi bark.

Reviewer comments #5
Methylparaben is a familiar compound. Can you give literature which supported your claim that methylparaben is responsible for the antioxidant of Baccaurea macrocarpa extract?

Author response #5
I could not find in the literature that discusses the antioxidant properties of parabens in vegetation, but methylparaben is preservative and antioxidant in cosmetic products, medicines or pharmaceutical products, and food ingredients. Based on GC-MS data, methylparaben is most likely to be antioxidants
Reviewer comments #1
In first paragraph line 5, please correct your statement on natural ingredients “do not contain chemicals” that only can be found in modern medicines, as all things in this world is formed from chemical constituents. Please change to “contain toxic chemicals”

Author response #1
Thank you for your suggestion, It has been fixed

Reviewer comments #2
The statement “kinds of isolated compounds contained” are not correct as you don’t isolate the compound. Please remove the word “isolated”

Author response #2
The word isolated has been removed

Reviewer comments #3
Methods:
DPPH assay alone can’t express the antioxidant properties of the sample, so we suggest you add other antioxidant assays as ABTS and FRAP

Author response #3
This study is an initial screening of the antioxidant activity of Tampoi bark.

Reviewer comments #4
Discussion:
GCMS result indicated that the main constituent in Baccaurea macrocarpa extract is a fatty acid, this is because the GCMS can only detect the volatile compounds. To identify other compounds that are responsible for the antioxidant activity of Baccaurea macrocarpa, we suggest you to run your sample using LCMS.

Author response #4
The next project if we get the funding, we will use another antioxidant test and other instruments as you suggest. We will also carry out isolation and purification to obtain active compounds from Tampoi bark.

Reviewer comments #5
Methylparaben is a familiar compound. Can you give literature which supported your claim that methylparaben is responsible for the antioxidant of Baccaurea macrocarpa extract?

Author response #5
I could not find in the literature that discusses the antioxidant properties of parabens in vegetation, but methylparaben is preservative and antioxidant in cosmetic products, medicines or pharmaceutical products, and food ingredients. Based on GC-MS data, methylparaben is most likely to be antioxidants
Competing Interests: no competing interests Close
Report a concern
Respond or Comment

COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT

Author Response 12 Dec 2019

erwin erwin, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Mulawarman University, Samarinda, 75123, Indonesia

12 Dec 2019

Author Response

Reviewer comments #1
In first paragraph line 5, please correct your statement on natural ingredients “do not contain chemicals” that only can be found in modern medicines, as all things in this ... Continue reading Reviewer comments #1
In first paragraph line 5, please correct your statement on natural ingredients “do not contain chemicals” that only can be found in modern medicines, as all things in this world is formed from chemical constituents. Please change to “contain toxic chemicals”

Author response #1
Thank you for your suggestion, It has been fixed

Reviewer comments #2
The statement “kinds of isolated compounds contained” are not correct as you don’t isolate the compound. Please remove the word “isolated”

Author response #2
The word isolated has been removed

Reviewer comments #3
Methods:
DPPH assay alone can’t express the antioxidant properties of the sample, so we suggest you add other antioxidant assays as ABTS and FRAP

Author response #3
This study is an initial screening of the antioxidant activity of Tampoi bark.

Reviewer comments #4
Discussion:
GCMS result indicated that the main constituent in Baccaurea macrocarpa extract is a fatty acid, this is because the GCMS can only detect the volatile compounds. To identify other compounds that are responsible for the antioxidant activity of Baccaurea macrocarpa, we suggest you to run your sample using LCMS.

Author response #4
The next project if we get the funding, we will use another antioxidant test and other instruments as you suggest. We will also carry out isolation and purification to obtain active compounds from Tampoi bark.

Reviewer comments #5
Methylparaben is a familiar compound. Can you give literature which supported your claim that methylparaben is responsible for the antioxidant of Baccaurea macrocarpa extract?

Author response #5
I could not find in the literature that discusses the antioxidant properties of parabens in vegetation, but methylparaben is preservative and antioxidant in cosmetic products, medicines or pharmaceutical products, and food ingredients. Based on GC-MS data, methylparaben is most likely to be antioxidants
Reviewer comments #1
In first paragraph line 5, please correct your statement on natural ingredients “do not contain chemicals” that only can be found in modern medicines, as all things in this world is formed from chemical constituents. Please change to “contain toxic chemicals”

Author response #1
Thank you for your suggestion, It has been fixed

Reviewer comments #2
The statement “kinds of isolated compounds contained” are not correct as you don’t isolate the compound. Please remove the word “isolated”

Author response #2
The word isolated has been removed

Reviewer comments #3
Methods:
DPPH assay alone can’t express the antioxidant properties of the sample, so we suggest you add other antioxidant assays as ABTS and FRAP

Author response #3
This study is an initial screening of the antioxidant activity of Tampoi bark.

Reviewer comments #4
Discussion:
GCMS result indicated that the main constituent in Baccaurea macrocarpa extract is a fatty acid, this is because the GCMS can only detect the volatile compounds. To identify other compounds that are responsible for the antioxidant activity of Baccaurea macrocarpa, we suggest you to run your sample using LCMS.

Author response #4
The next project if we get the funding, we will use another antioxidant test and other instruments as you suggest. We will also carry out isolation and purification to obtain active compounds from Tampoi bark.

Reviewer comments #5
Methylparaben is a familiar compound. Can you give literature which supported your claim that methylparaben is responsible for the antioxidant of Baccaurea macrocarpa extract?

Author response #5
I could not find in the literature that discusses the antioxidant properties of parabens in vegetation, but methylparaben is preservative and antioxidant in cosmetic products, medicines or pharmaceutical products, and food ingredients. Based on GC-MS data, methylparaben is most likely to be antioxidants
Competing Interests: no competing interests Close
Report a concern

Views

Reviewer Report 06 Nov 2019

Natthida Weerapreeyakul, Division of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

Not Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.18189.r56217

According to the GC chromatogram the peak that was claimed to be methyl paraben was detected at 9.479 min but when identified with the MS the peak at 9.467 min was identified instead. This might be wrong interpretation.
Why the peak with high intensity detected at 19.329 min of methyl palmitate was not considered as the major compound or whether it was contributed to the antioxidant effect?
Due to there are many antioxidant mechanisms, therefore, only DPPH scavenging activity is not sufficient.
Cytotoxicity result was not shown and sufficiently discussed in correlation with the antioxidant activity.
The statistical analysis should be mentioned in the method section.
Based on the insufficient information and evidence, this manuscript needs more experimentation and well written regarding the method, results and discussion.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

No
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

No
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

I cannot comment. A qualified statistician is required.
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

No
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

No

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Pharmacology, Biomedical sciences

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Views

Reviewer Report 04 Nov 2019

Chinnadurai Immanuel Selvaraj, Department of Biotechnology, School of Biosciences and Technology,, VIT University, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India

Approved with Reservations

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.18189.r44034

The study design and the methodology sounds good. Still more details on the plant B. macrocarpa need to be included in the introduction. Even though the authors try to substantiate Methyl paraben as a non-toxic compound, it is a universally known fact usage of Methyl paraben is strongly discouraged in all human usage food and cosmetics as preservative. The Environmental Working Group (EWG) lists methylparaben as being a low to moderate Health Hazard. Parabens are potential endocrine disruptors due to their ability to mimic estrogen. Studies demonstrate that at sufficient concentrations, parabens can increase cell proliferation in human breast cancer MCF-7 cells, which are often used as a sensitive measure of estrogenic activity. Applying personal care product containing parabens—especially methylparaben—can lead to UV-induced damage of skin cells and disruption of cell proliferation (cell growth rate). These are evidenced reports on the Methyl paraben. Nevertheless, it is available in the natural source from the plant in meagre quantity. The authors can check for other compounds in GC-MS and state its importance in the manuscript. The GC-MS can be repeated. or HPLC can be performed using an aqueous extract. A simple TLC becomes handy for compound prediction, Then a column chromatography will be useful to check if there are any useful compounds.

The authors fail to include the ill effects of Methyl paraben in the literature. Is there any reason for avoiding such inclusions? The authors should weigh the importance of other compounds in the plant. Is there any traditional/ancient usage of the fruit mentioned in literature must be included in Introduction section.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Plant Phyto chemistry

CITE

Report a concern

Author Response 12 Dec 2019

erwin erwin, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Mulawarman University, Samarinda, 75123, Indonesia

12 Dec 2019

Author Response

Reviewer comment #1
The authors can check for other compounds in GC-MS and state its importance in the manuscript

Author response #1
We have re-checked the 37 peaks which appeared to be methylparaben most likely to ... Continue reading Reviewer comment #1
The authors can check for other compounds in GC-MS and state its importance in the manuscript

Author response #1
We have re-checked the 37 peaks which appeared to be methylparaben most likely to be antioxidants

Reviewer comment #2
The GC-MS can be repeated or HPLC can be performed using an aqueous extract. A simple TLC becomes handy for compound prediction, Then a column chromatography will be useful to check if there are any useful compounds.

Author response #2
This study is an initial screening of the antioxidant activity of Tampoi bark. The next project if we get the funding, we will use other instruments as you suggested. We will also carry out isolation and purification to obtain active compounds from Tampoi bark. We appreciated your suggestion

Reviewer comment #3
The authors fail to include the ill effects of Methyl paraben in the literature

Author response #3
We have added additional literature about the side effects of methyl paraben. Ref. no: 27

Reviewer comment #4
Is there any traditional/ancient usage of the fruit mentioned in literature must be included in the Introduction section

Author response #4
We did not find any use of tampoi as traditional medicine, but several other species of the genus Baccuarea were used as traditional medicine. In addition, there are several preliminary studies on Tampoi's bio-activity. Ref. no: 3,4,8, and 9
Reviewer comment #1
The authors can check for other compounds in GC-MS and state its importance in the manuscript

Author response #1
We have re-checked the 37 peaks which appeared to be methylparaben most likely to be antioxidants

Reviewer comment #2
The GC-MS can be repeated or HPLC can be performed using an aqueous extract. A simple TLC becomes handy for compound prediction, Then a column chromatography will be useful to check if there are any useful compounds.

Author response #2
This study is an initial screening of the antioxidant activity of Tampoi bark. The next project if we get the funding, we will use other instruments as you suggested. We will also carry out isolation and purification to obtain active compounds from Tampoi bark. We appreciated your suggestion

Reviewer comment #3
The authors fail to include the ill effects of Methyl paraben in the literature

Author response #3
We have added additional literature about the side effects of methyl paraben. Ref. no: 27

Reviewer comment #4
Is there any traditional/ancient usage of the fruit mentioned in literature must be included in the Introduction section

Author response #4
We did not find any use of tampoi as traditional medicine, but several other species of the genus Baccuarea were used as traditional medicine. In addition, there are several preliminary studies on Tampoi's bio-activity. Ref. no: 3,4,8, and 9
Competing Interests: no competing interests Close
Report a concern
Respond or Comment

COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT

Author Response 12 Dec 2019

erwin erwin, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Mulawarman University, Samarinda, 75123, Indonesia

12 Dec 2019

Author Response

Reviewer comment #1
The authors can check for other compounds in GC-MS and state its importance in the manuscript

Author response #1
We have re-checked the 37 peaks which appeared to be methylparaben most likely to ... Continue reading Reviewer comment #1
The authors can check for other compounds in GC-MS and state its importance in the manuscript

Author response #1
We have re-checked the 37 peaks which appeared to be methylparaben most likely to be antioxidants

Reviewer comment #2
The GC-MS can be repeated or HPLC can be performed using an aqueous extract. A simple TLC becomes handy for compound prediction, Then a column chromatography will be useful to check if there are any useful compounds.

Author response #2
This study is an initial screening of the antioxidant activity of Tampoi bark. The next project if we get the funding, we will use other instruments as you suggested. We will also carry out isolation and purification to obtain active compounds from Tampoi bark. We appreciated your suggestion

Reviewer comment #3
The authors fail to include the ill effects of Methyl paraben in the literature

Author response #3
We have added additional literature about the side effects of methyl paraben. Ref. no: 27

Reviewer comment #4
Is there any traditional/ancient usage of the fruit mentioned in literature must be included in the Introduction section

Author response #4
We did not find any use of tampoi as traditional medicine, but several other species of the genus Baccuarea were used as traditional medicine. In addition, there are several preliminary studies on Tampoi's bio-activity. Ref. no: 3,4,8, and 9
Reviewer comment #1
The authors can check for other compounds in GC-MS and state its importance in the manuscript

Author response #1
We have re-checked the 37 peaks which appeared to be methylparaben most likely to be antioxidants

Reviewer comment #2
The GC-MS can be repeated or HPLC can be performed using an aqueous extract. A simple TLC becomes handy for compound prediction, Then a column chromatography will be useful to check if there are any useful compounds.

Author response #2
This study is an initial screening of the antioxidant activity of Tampoi bark. The next project if we get the funding, we will use other instruments as you suggested. We will also carry out isolation and purification to obtain active compounds from Tampoi bark. We appreciated your suggestion

Reviewer comment #3
The authors fail to include the ill effects of Methyl paraben in the literature

Author response #3
We have added additional literature about the side effects of methyl paraben. Ref. no: 27

Reviewer comment #4
Is there any traditional/ancient usage of the fruit mentioned in literature must be included in the Introduction section

Author response #4
We did not find any use of tampoi as traditional medicine, but several other species of the genus Baccuarea were used as traditional medicine. In addition, there are several preliminary studies on Tampoi's bio-activity. Ref. no: 3,4,8, and 9
Competing Interests: no competing interests Close
Report a concern

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2

VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 24 Dec 2018

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

	Invited Reviewers
	1	2	3	4
Version 2 (revision) 12 Dec 19		read	read	read
Version 1 24 Dec 18	read	read	read	read

Chinnadurai Immanuel Selvaraj, VIT University, Vellore, India
Natthida Weerapreeyakul, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
Agustono Wibowo, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Pahang Darul Makmur, Malaysia
Chanya Chaicharoenpong, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

Comments on this article

All Comments(0)

Add a comment

Browse by related subjects

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

9 Views

20 Dec 2019 | for Version 2

Chanya Chaicharoenpong, Institute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Molecular Crop Research Unit, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

9 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved With Reservations

This manuscript reported the information of phytochemical and antioxidant activity of barks of Baccaurea macrocarpa.

The results of evaluation on phytochemicals of barks of B. macrocarpa showed that the methanol extract consisted of alkaloids, steroids, triterpenoids, flavonoids and phenolic compounds. But the profile of GC-MS showed only fatty acids, fatty acid esters and methyl paraben. The authors should use LC-MS to investigate chemical constituents of methanol extract instead of GC-MS.
Check the scientific name through the whole manuscript. When the scientific name appears first time in manuscript, it is full written both Genus and species, and then use the abbreviated binomial form for the following times.
In methods section, Phytochemical evaluation of alkaloids: “H₂SO₄ 1M” must correct to “1M H₂SO₄”
In methods section, Phytochemical evaluation of alkaloids: Please correct your statement “The formation of orange on filter paper….”
In methods section, Steroids and triterpenoids: “green or purple precipitation/red precipitation” must correct to “green or purple precipitate/red precipitate"
In methods section, the details of GC and MS conditions must clearly clarify.
In results section, the results should express your statistical analysis.
In results section, Table 2: It is essential to set the concentration of sample for calibration range to less than 50% mortality and greater than 50% mortality, and the calibration curve is linear. The results should express your statistical analysis.
In results section, Table 3: Check the data and calculation in Table 3. The results should express your statistical analysis.
In results section, Table 4: Data of peak no. 13 does not complete.
In discussion section, the data of GC-MS analysis (page 7) does not match the data in Table 4.
In discussion section, correct the equation of DPPH and ArOH on page 7.
In discussion section, correct “benzoate acid” to “benzoic acid”.
To improve the quality of English, the authors must correct grammatical errors and English improvement throughout the manuscript.

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Natural Product Chemistry.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

15 Views

16 Dec 2019 | for Version 2

Natthida Weerapreeyakul, Division of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

15 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Not Approved

I respectfully reject this manuscript as following reasons:

This manuscript contains insufficient data although the authors tried to explain that this is a screening study.

In addition to my previous comments I have following notifications:

Table 2, the LC₅₀value which is 1577.89 ppm was not in the concentration range (7.8 - 500 ppm) used in the study.
Table 3, Inhibition should be rewritten.
Table 3 , an IC₅₀ value (11.15 ppm) of bark was suspicious as the lowest concentration used was 20 ppm.
There is some typing error of DPPH reaction as AOH supposed to be ArOH.

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Cancer, Apoptosis, Cell base assay, Anioxidation, Antiproliferation, Chemometric analysis

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

10 Views

16 Dec 2019 | for Version 2

Agustono Wibowo, Faculty Applied Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Pahang Darul Makmur, Malaysia

10 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

Approved.

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Natural Product Chemistry and Organic Synthesis

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

16 Views

15 Nov 2019 | for Version 1

Chanya Chaicharoenpong, Institute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Molecular Crop Research Unit, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

16 Views Cite this report Responses(1)

Approved With Reservations

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Natural Product Chemistry.

Respond to this report

Responses (1)

Author Response

12 Dec 2019

erwin erwin, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Mulawarman University, Samarinda, 75123, Indonesia

Reviewer comment #1
The authors used only DPPH assay to evaluate antioxidant activity. The antioxidant activity should be investigated using various assays to present antioxidant capacity of the extracts. The results of evaluation on phytochemical of barks of B. macrocarpa showed that the methanol extract consisted of alkaloids, steroids, triterpenoids, flavonoids and phenolic compounds. But the profile of GC-MS showed only fatty acids, fatty acid esters and methyl paraben. The authors should use LC-MS to investigate chemical constituents of methanol extract instead of GC-MS.

Author response #1
This study is an initial screening of the antioxidant activity of Tampoi bark. The next project if we get the funding, we will use another antioxidant test and other instruments as you suggest. We will also carry out isolation and purification to obtain active compounds from Tampoi bark. Thank you for your valuable suggestion

Reviewer comment #2
In the results section, the authors did not mention on the toxicity test of the extract using brine shrimp lethality test. And the results should express your statistical analysis

Author response #2
Toxicity test data have been added in the revised article

Reviewer comment #3
some compounds presented low matching percentage from the library searching

Author response #3
It has been fixed

Reviewer comment #4
In Figure 2, the structure of methylparaben was wrong.

Author response #4
The structure of methylparaben has been fixed

Reviewer comment #5
In the discussion section, the third paragraph, the authors need to rewrite the total content and composition of fatty acids. GC chromatogram in Figure 1 was not related to the data of composition of compounds in Table 3 such as retention time, % peak area. For example, peak at retention time 19.329 showed high intensity on GC chromatogram but it expressed a low % peak area just 0.91. The peak at retention time 14.877 showed low intensity on GC chromatogram but it expressed % peak area 1.32.

Author response #5
The percentage (%) peak area of GC chromatogram has been fixed

View more View less

Competing Interests

no competing interests

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

20 Views

11 Nov 2019 | for Version 1

Agustono Wibowo, Faculty Applied Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Pahang Darul Makmur, Malaysia

20 Views Cite this report Responses(1)

Approved With Reservations

Introduction:

In first paragraph line 5, please correct your statement on natural ingredients “do not contain chemicals” that only can be found in modern medicines, as all things in this world is formed from chemical constituents. Please change to “contain toxic chemicals”.
Last paragraph line 5, the statement “kinds of isolated compounds contained” are not correct as you don’t isolate the compound. Please remove the word “isolated”.

Methods:

DDPH assay alone can’t express the antioxidant properties of sample, so we suggest you to add other antioxidant assay such as ABTS and FRAP.

Discussion:

GCMS result indicated that the main constituent in Baccaurea macrocarpa extract is fatty acid, this is because the GCMS can only detect the volatile compounds. To identify other compounds that are responsible in the antioxidant activity of Baccaurea macrocarpa, we suggest you to run your sample using LCMS.
Methylparaben is familiar compound. Can you give literature which supported your claim that methylparaben is responsible to the antioxidant of Baccaurea macrocarpa extract?

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Natural Product Chemistry and Organic Synthesis

Respond to this report

Responses (1)

Author Response

12 Dec 2019

erwin erwin, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Mulawarman University, Samarinda, 75123, Indonesia

Reviewer comments #1
In first paragraph line 5, please correct your statement on natural ingredients “do not contain chemicals” that only can be found in modern medicines, as all things in this world is formed from chemical constituents. Please change to “contain toxic chemicals”

Author response #1
Thank you for your suggestion, It has been fixed

Reviewer comments #2
The statement “kinds of isolated compounds contained” are not correct as you don’t isolate the compound. Please remove the word “isolated”

Author response #2
The word isolated has been removed

Reviewer comments #3
Methods:
DPPH assay alone can’t express the antioxidant properties of the sample, so we suggest you add other antioxidant assays as ABTS and FRAP

Author response #3
This study is an initial screening of the antioxidant activity of Tampoi bark.

Reviewer comments #4
Discussion:
GCMS result indicated that the main constituent in Baccaurea macrocarpa extract is a fatty acid, this is because the GCMS can only detect the volatile compounds. To identify other compounds that are responsible for the antioxidant activity of Baccaurea macrocarpa, we suggest you to run your sample using LCMS.

Author response #4
The next project if we get the funding, we will use another antioxidant test and other instruments as you suggest. We will also carry out isolation and purification to obtain active compounds from Tampoi bark.

Reviewer comments #5
Methylparaben is a familiar compound. Can you give literature which supported your claim that methylparaben is responsible for the antioxidant of Baccaurea macrocarpa extract?

Author response #5
I could not find in the literature that discusses the antioxidant properties of parabens in vegetation, but methylparaben is preservative and antioxidant in cosmetic products, medicines or pharmaceutical products, and food ingredients. Based on GC-MS data, methylparaben is most likely to be antioxidants

View more View less

Competing Interests

no competing interests

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

24 Views

06 Nov 2019 | for Version 1

Natthida Weerapreeyakul, Division of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

24 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Not Approved

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

No
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

No
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

I cannot comment. A qualified statistician is required.
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

No
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

No

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Pharmacology, Biomedical sciences

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

32 Views

04 Nov 2019 | for Version 1

Chinnadurai Immanuel Selvaraj, Department of Biotechnology, School of Biosciences and Technology,, VIT University, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India

32 Views Cite this report Responses(1)

Approved With Reservations

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Plant Phyto chemistry

Respond to this report

Responses (1)

Author Response

12 Dec 2019

erwin erwin, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Mulawarman University, Samarinda, 75123, Indonesia

Reviewer comment #1
The authors can check for other compounds in GC-MS and state its importance in the manuscript

Author response #1
We have re-checked the 37 peaks which appeared to be methylparaben most likely to be antioxidants

Reviewer comment #2
The GC-MS can be repeated or HPLC can be performed using an aqueous extract. A simple TLC becomes handy for compound prediction, Then a column chromatography will be useful to check if there are any useful compounds.

Author response #2
This study is an initial screening of the antioxidant activity of Tampoi bark. The next project if we get the funding, we will use other instruments as you suggested. We will also carry out isolation and purification to obtain active compounds from Tampoi bark. We appreciated your suggestion

Reviewer comment #3
The authors fail to include the ill effects of Methyl paraben in the literature

Author response #3
We have added additional literature about the side effects of methyl paraben. Ref. no: 27

Reviewer comment #4
Is there any traditional/ancient usage of the fruit mentioned in literature must be included in the Introduction section

Author response #4
We did not find any use of tampoi as traditional medicine, but several other species of the genus Baccuarea were used as traditional medicine. In addition, there are several preliminary studies on Tampoi's bio-activity. Ref. no: 3,4,8, and 9

View more View less

Competing Interests

no competing interests

Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:

Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested

Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.

Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Click here to access the data.

Downloaded data do not display as expected? Download the data

[1] 1. Yuwono A: The Fifth National Report of Indonesia to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Ministry of Environment and Forestry of Indonesia. 2014. Reference Source

[2] 2. Hussin AHJ: Adverse Effect of Herbs and Drug-Herbal Interactions. Malaysian Journal of Pharmacy. 2001; 1(2): 39–44. Reference Source

[3] 3. Ibrahim D, Hazali N, Jauhari N, et al.: Physicochemical and Antioxidant Characteristics of Baccaurea angulata Fruit Juice Extract. Afr J Biotechnol. 2013; 12(34): 5333–5338. Publisher Full Text

[4] 4. Ibrahim M, Ahmed IA, Mikail MA, et al.: Baccaurea angulata fruit juice reduces atherosclerotic lesions in diet-induced Hypercholesterolemic rabbits. Lipids Health Dis. 2017; 16(1): 134. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[5] 5. Bakar MF, Ahmad AN, Karim FA, et al.: Phytochemicals and Antioxidative Properties of Borneo Indigenous Liposu (Baccaurea lanceolata) and Tampoi (Baccaurea macrocarpa) Fruits. Antioxidants (Basel). 2014; 3(3): 516–525. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[6] 6. Erwin, Noor A, Soekamto NH, et al.: Waltherione C and Cleomiscosin from Melochia umbellata var. Degrabrata K. (Malvaceae), Biosynthetic and Chemotaxonomic Significance. Biochem Syst Ecol. 2014; 55: 358–361. Publisher Full Text

[7] 7. Erwin, Nisa RN, Daniel: Phytochemical Test, Toxicity and Antioxidant Activity Leaves Kerehau (Callicarpa longifolia Lam.) with DPPH Method. Indonesia Chimica Acta. 2015; 8(1): 52–59. Reference Source

[8] 8. Meyer BN, Ferrighi NR, Putnam JE, et al.: Brine shrimp: a convenient general bioassay for active plant constituents. Planta Med. 1982; 45(5): 31–34. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[9] 9. Erwin: Phytocemical Analysis and Antioxidant Activity of the Wood Ethanolic Extract of Sirih Hutan (Piper aduncum). Indonesia Chimica Acta. 2015; 8(20): 11–16. Reference Source

[10] 10. Anokwah D, Mensah AY, Amponsah IK, et al.: Anti-inflammatory, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of the Stem Bark of Psydrax subcordata. Der Pharmacia Lettre. 2016; 8(20): 21–28. Reference Source

[11] 11. Borkataky M: Antioxidant Activity, Total Phenolic Content and Total Flavonoid Content of Perilla ocymoides Linn. Der Pharmacia Lettre. 2015; 7(5): 69–72. Reference Source

[12] 12. Diplock AT: Will the 'good fairies' please prove to us that vitamin E lessens human degenerative disease? Free Radic Res. 1997; 27(5): 511–532. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[13] 13. Prior RL, Wu X, Schaich K: Standardized methods for the determination of antioxidant capacity and phenolics in foods and dietary supplements. J Agric Food Chem. 2005; 53(10): 4290–4302. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[14] 14. Akar Z, Küçük M, Doğan H: A new colorimetric DPPH^• scavenging activity method with no need for a spectrophotometer applied on synthetic and natural antioxidants and medicinal herbs. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2017; 32(1): 640–647. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[15] 15. Elagbar ZA, Naik RR, Shakya AK, et al.: Fatty Acids Analysis, Antioxidant and Biological Activity of Fixed Oil of Annona muricata L. Seeds. J Chem. 2016; 1–6, 6948098. Publisher Full Text

[16] 16. Perona JS, Archemis C, Ruiz-Gutierrez V, et al.: Effect of dietary high-oleic-acid oils that are rich in antioxidants on microsomal lipid peroxidation in rats. J Agric Food Chem. 2005; 53(3): 730–735. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[17] 17. Pintato MEA, Araújo SG, Morais MI, et al.: Antifungal and antioxidant activity of fatty acid methyl esters from vegetable oils. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2017; 89(3): 1671–1681. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[18] 18. Bendary E, Francis RR, Ali HMG, et al.: Antioxidant and Structure–Activity Relationships (SARs) of Some Phenolic and Anilines Compounds. Annals of Agricultural Science. 2013; 58(2): 173–181. Publisher Full Text

[19] 19. Brand-Willians W, Cuvelier ME, Berset C: Use of a free radical Method to Evaluate Antioxidant Activity. LWT - Food Sci Technol. 1995; 28(1): 25–30. Publisher Full Text

[20] 20. Villaño D, Fernández-Pachón MS, Moyá ML, et al.: Radical scavenging ability of polyphenolic compounds towards DPPH free radical. Talanta. 2007; 71(1): 230–235. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[21] 21. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP): Reflection Paper on the Use of Methyl- and PropylParaben as Excipients in Human Medicinal Products for Oral Use. European Medicines Agency Science Medicines Health. 2015; 1–13. Reference Source

[22] 22. Macy E, Schatz M, Zeiger RS: Immediate Hypersensitivity to Methylparaben Causing False-Positive Results of Local Anesthetic Skin Testing or Provocative Dose Testing. Perm J. 2002; 6(4): 17–21. Free Full Text

[23] 23. Micea MM, Lupşa IR, Cinghiţă DF, et al.: Determination of Methylparaben from Cosmetic Products by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography. J Serb Chem Soc. 2009; 74(6): 669–676. Publisher Full Text

[24] 24. Mirsonbol SZ, Issazadeh K, Pahlaviani MRMK, et al.: Antimicrobial Efficacy of the Methylparaben and Benzoate Sodium against Selected Standard Microorganisms, Clinical and Environmental Isolates In Vitro. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences. 2014; 4(S4): 363–367. Reference Source

[25] 25. Erwin E, Pusparohmana WR, Sari IP, et al.: Dataset 1 in: Phytochemical and antioxidant activity evaluation of the bark of Tampoi (Baccaurea macrocarpa). F1000Research. 2018. http://www.doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.16643.d227222

Phytochemical and antioxidant activity evaluation of the bark of Tampoi (Baccaurea macrocarpa)

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Extraction

Phytochemical evaluation

Toxicity test

Antioxidant assay

GC-MS analysis

Results

Table 1. Phytochemical evaluation of the methanol extract of bark of Tampoi (Baccaurea macrocarpa).

Table 2. Antioxidant activity of the methanol extract of bark of Tampoi (Baccaurea macrocarpa).

Figure 1. GC chromatogram of methanol extract of bark of Tampoi (Baccaurea macrocarpa).

Table 3. Composition of compounds from methanol extract of bark of Tampoi (B. macrocarpa).

Discussion

Figure 2. Prediction of DPPH radical scavenging mechanism by methylparaben.

Conclusion

Data availability

Grant information

Acknowledgements

References

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

Comments on this article

Browse by related subjects

The problem

How to fix it

Competing Interests Policy

Stay Updated