Keywords
Severe asthma, Omics sciences, Inflammation, Precision medicine
Severe asthma, Omics sciences, Inflammation, Precision medicine
Several aspects of asthma heterogeneity both from a clinical and pathophysiological perspective still remain unclear. A number of treatment options have been developed over time, from the widely used corticosteroids to personalized approaches, including recently introduced biological therapies. The new classification of severe asthma is based on endotypes, whose definition relies on the features of the underlying inflammation. The endotypes define traditional phenotypes by describing their pathophysiological mechanisms1,2. Exploring endotypes and phenotypes supports the identification of specific molecular targets, which can be addressed by precision treatments such as biologic drugs. The management of severe asthma is benefitting from personalized medicine approaches based on the characterization of an increasing number of endotypes, which represent the targets of specific therapies3. These are mainly represented by the Th2-high subtype and the Th2-low subtype, characterized respectively by the presence of eosinophilic or neutrophilic/paucigranulocytic airway inflammation3. Currently targeted therapies for a number of Th2 – low endotypes are still lacking4. For this and other reasons, the need for increasing the effectiveness of personalized therapies opens the field to the omics approach.
New asthma phenotyping has led to a growing interest in targeted therapies. The search for new pharmacological targets has caused interest in understanding the pathophysiological and molecular mechanisms underlying asthma. So far, the majority of the available drugs target the Th2-cytokine pathway5.
Omics technology supports precision medicine in identifying the most effective treatment for different clinical phenotypes, in contrast with the “one size fits all” approach. Indeed, omics sciences contribute to the definition of new biomarkers, which can be useful as hallmarks of a specific asthma endotype or phenotype, and relevant as novel targets for pharmacology treatments. In the field of molecular biology, omics is a neologism that indicates high-throughput experimental technologies providing the tools for comprehensively monitoring the disease processes at a molecular level. The suffix “ome” comes from “chromosome” and currently includes several biological fields such as genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics and epigenomics. Genomics and transcriptomics have been used to identify genes associated with asthma severity (Figure 1). Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have shed light on distinct pathways that contribute to asthma inflammation. Genes such as HLA, IL13, IL33, thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) involved in Th2 pathway, IL-1 receptor–like 1 (IL1RL1), encodes ST2, and the receptor for IL-33 are associated with asthma onset. In contrast, it is well-known that the risk of childhood asthma is associated with the 17q21 locus encoding the ORMDL3 and GSDML genes6,7. Transcriptomics are focused on microRNAs (MiRNAs). MiRNAs are small non-coding single strand RNA chains involved in post-transcriptional regulation processes. MiRNAs play a key role in regulating cell functions as well as in modulating the inflammatory pathways. They may influence the single endotype profile in the complex asthma phenotype picture. MiRNAs can be collected through peripheral blood sampling, or, more invasively, through bronchial biopsies and induced sputum8,9. Under-expression of miRNA 192 in blood was investigated in a small study, in which asthma patients underwent an allergen inhalation challenge10. The relevance of miRNA as a biomarker is increasingly investigated. Different levels of miR-1248 serum expression in asthmatic vs non-asthmatic patients have been documented. In asthmatic patients miR-1248 is also involved in the regulation of IL-5 pathway10. Among the omics, circulating miRNA deserves a specific interest. Circulating miRNAs might be a non-invasive biomarker useful in asthma diagnosis and characterisation, as demonstrated in a recent study. According to the authors, a specific subset of circulating miRNAs (miR-125b, miR-16, miR-299-5p, miR-126, miR-206, and miR-133b) was found in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma11.
Epigenomics represent another relevant issue. The “methylome” (the set of DNA methylation patterns) has been increasingly investigated through highly sophisticated sequence-based assays. Epigenetic mechanisms could lead to the identification of new asthma biomarkers. Recently, an epigenetic association between serum IgE concentration and methylation at different loci derived from DNA of leukocites has been described. Methylation at these CpG islands differed significantly in isolated eosinophils between subjects with and without asthma and high IgE levels12.
Modern and advanced technologies, such as mass spectrometry, allow the detection of several proteins involved in the inflammatory mechanisms of asthma. Among the proteomics signatures characterized so far, Galectin-3 deserves to be mentioned. It has been demonstrated that this protein is expressed in omalizumab responders only. Furthermore galectin–3 seems to be associated with a more evident respiratory function improvement in asthmatic patients treated with omalizumab13.
The increasing interest in metabolomics, is mainly due to its prospective clinical applications. According to recent findings it is possible to define the metabolic profile through different samples including exhaled breath, urine, plasma and serum14. Currently a branch of metabolomics called “breathomics” focuses on volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from the respiratory tract. VOCs represent potential non-invasive metabolic biomarkers, particularly in the diagnosis and monitoring of pulmonary diseases including asthma15. Moreover, an electronic nose able to discriminate asthmatic from healthy controls by detecting different VOCs in exhaled breath has been developed15,16. Therefore, metabolomics could play a key role in identifying biomarkers and improving asthma endotyping.
The application of omics technology in asthma is following other research fields, such as oncology17. Similarly, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for severe asthma have been recently introduced, while biological therapies addressing rheumatic diseases, solid tumors and blood cancer arrived more than a decade before. From 2006 to 2017 omalizumab was the only available treatment for severe allergic asthma. Only in recent years research and knowledge on new drugs has been developed to achieve new and more effective therapeutic options18. Though an increasing interest in omics technology, none of the omics signatures mentioned above have been translated into clinical practice. We believe that there is an urgent need for large-scale studies. Particularly, specific Randomized Controlled Trials would be necessary to definitively confirm the clinical relevance of omics and reinforcing omics’ role in searching for new biomarkers and prognostic factors. The need for correctly selecting the right mAb for the right patient is one of the key points in severe asthma management. The real challenge for researchers and clinicians in the “omics era” is therefore translating acquired knowledge into clinical practice in order to emphasize omics’ role in precision medicine and to predict response to treatments. Unfortunately, in our opinion we are still far from that scenario.
No data is associated with this article.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the topic of the opinion article discussed accurately in the context of the current literature?
Yes
Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?
Yes
Are arguments sufficiently supported by evidence from the published literature?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn balanced and justified on the basis of the presented arguments?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Is the topic of the opinion article discussed accurately in the context of the current literature?
Yes
Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?
Yes
Are arguments sufficiently supported by evidence from the published literature?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn balanced and justified on the basis of the presented arguments?
Yes
Competing Interests: I've received grants as speakers by GSK, Novartis, Astrazeneca, Biofutura, Menarini, Guidotti
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 2 (revision) 18 May 18 |
read | |
Version 1 04 Apr 18 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)