Keywords
sleep, BMI, fitbit, wearable
sleep, BMI, fitbit, wearable
The association between sleep and body mass index (BMI) is well known1. Recently Xu and colleagues2 showed that shorter sleep duration, as measured by a Fitbit wristband, was associated with a higher average BMI2. These results importantly show the potential value of mainstream consumer devices for scientific research by providing objective sleep and physical activity data. A limitation of the Xu et al. study however, as noted by the authors2, is the lack of diversity of ethnicity in their study population, with the majority of participants being of European descent. In order to assess the utility of wearables for global research we used data from a recently published study3 to investigate the relationship between sleep and BMI in a largely Chinese population.
Data was obtained from the study by Lim and colleagues3. In brief, this study generated Fitbit Charge heart rate (HR) data from a cohort of volunteers tracked for a median duration of 4 days3. The volunteers underwent comprehensive profiling including activity tracking (step count and sleep tracking) using the Fitbit Charge HR wearable sensor and BMI measurement at day of recruitment. From the total cohort of 233 individuals contributing data3, association analyses were conducted on subjects who had valid measurements for all metric types and who had more than one day of sleep data.
To test the association between average hours of sleep and BMI multiple linear regression analyses were conducted using the ‘statsmodels’ package in python.
Useable data was available for 212 individuals; the summary of their clinical and demographic characteristics are shown in Table 1.
A linear regression analysis showed that after adjusting for age, gender, race, and average number of steps taken per day, average hours of sleep per day was negatively associated with BMI (p=0.02): an hour increase in sleep per day was associated with approximately a 0.5 point decrease in BMI (Table 2, Figure 1).
In summary, we found that the findings of Xu and colleagues are consistent in a population of different ancestry. More generally, previous work2,3 and that described here demonstrates the significant potential for wearables in global biomedical research and further, as we used openly available data, this analysis shows the benefits of sharing observational data4.
All data used in this study is available from the article by Lim et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.20042853
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
No
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
No
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Lifestyle epidemiology; lifestyle interventions to prevent diabetes type 2; wearable technology
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 2 (revision) 07 Sep 18 |
read | read |
Version 1 27 Apr 18 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)