Introduction
Intestinal failure (IF) is the inability of the gut to absorb sufficient macronutrients (carbohydrates, protein, and fat), micronutrients (vitamins, minerals, and electrolytes), or water, resulting in the need for intravenous supplementation to maintain health or facilitate growth1. This is a relatively rare condition, affecting about 50 per million people with chronic IF (CIF) (type 3, see below) needing long-term home parenteral nutrition (HPN), but the impact on both the individual and the healthcare economy is high. The length of stay at the time of diagnosis of IF is commonly in the order of weeks to months and typically costs up to USD $150,000 per annum to keep someone on HPN2–9. This review will look at outcomes, complications, and current treatments for CIF (type 3).
Intestinal failure aetiology
The cause of IF can be categorised according to timing of presentation (congenital versus acquired, such as gastroschisis versus surgical complications), speed of onset (rapid versus prolonged, such as mesenteric ischaemia versus Crohn’s disease or chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction), underlying pathology (benign versus malignant), locality (localised to gastrointestinal tract versus systemic disease), and duration (short-term versus long-term). IF is frequently also categorised into three functional subtypes10, as seen in Table 1. Type 1 is usually self-limiting and typical examples include post-operative ileus. Type 2 IF presents following intra-abdominal surgery with metabolically unstable patients often with hostile abdomens, fistulae, or adhesions. These patients require a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach to their care, aiming to stabilise and move the patient to a position where the team can start repairing the physical and psychological distress encountered. These may include patients presenting following an acute traumatic event such as a traffic accident, following surgical procedures associated with anastomotic leaks, vascular or viscous injury during other surgery, creation of laparostomy (open abdominal wound), and acute unpredictable events such as enterocutaneous fistulae, intestinal volvulus, and mesenteric infarction. Type 3 IF is CIF and includes patients who have progressed from instability to stability, requiring long-term intravenous management of their IF over months to years; it may be reversible or irreversible11,12. There is a further helpful clinical classification of type 3 based on calories consumed (kcal/kg per day: 0, 1–10, 11–20, >20) and volume of intravenous support required (<1, 1.001–2, 2.001–3, >3 L)13. IF can be further classified according to pathophysiology: short bowel syndrome (SBS), intestinal fistulae, dysmotility, mechanical obstruction, and extensive small bowel mucosal disease.
Table 1. Defining intestinal failure subtypes.
Subtype | Presentation timing | Speed of onset | Locality of disease | Pathology | Duration |
---|
Type 1 | Acquired | Acute | GI and systemic | Benign and malignant | <28 days |
Type 2 | Congenital/acquired | Acute | GI and systemic | Benign and malignant | Weeks to months |
Type 3 | Congenital/acquired | Chronic | GI and systemic | Benign and malignant | Months to years |
Such classifications enable consistency for both clinical reporting of patients encountered and outcomes across specialist centres. In particular, the pathophysiological classification enables a clear understanding of the underlying mechanism and aetiology of the IF. The clinical classification according to level of calorific/fluid support required enables sensible understanding of disease severity, potentially facilitating a targeted approach to novel therapies aimed at minimising disease impact on the individual.
Complications of intestinal failure
Though life-sustaining, HPN is associated with complications, including those associated with the central venous catheter (CVC) used to administer the parenteral nutrition (PN), IF-associated liver disease (IFALD), an impact on quality of life (QoL), and metabolic bone problems. In non-cancer IF diagnoses, the survival is remarkable; 1-, 5-, 10-, and 20-year survival has been reported as 93%, 71%, 59%, and 28%, respectively14. Wherever a patient is—whether at home, in a specialist centre, or in a district general hospital—they should expect exceptional care of their CVC. The fragility of their venous access should ensure that all hospitals develop a standard of care to minimise complications. Well-skilled and well-resourced MDTs15–19 that maintain stability in terms of makeup of healthcare professionals and have clear protocols20,21 do better than teams experiencing high numbers of staff changes or organisational changes22.
Diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infections
One of the controversial areas within IF currently is the process of actually making the diagnosis of a catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) despite clear standards laid out by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Infectious Disease Society of America, and the European Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ESPEN)23–25, whose current recommendations include quantitative and qualitative methods to diagnose a CRBSI. Unfortunately, the standardisation of care both nationally and internationally through obtaining appropriate cultures requires investment in infrastructure and training. Quantitative analysis using pour plates, though the gold standard23, exists in only a limited number of exceptional centres21. Time to positivity needs a clear protocol of matched volumes added to the culture bottles from both peripheral and central access points26 followed by equal handling of the samples and presenting them to the lab within 30 minutes. Not unsurprisingly, within the literature, broad diagnostic criteria are followed and some are pragmatically decided on the basis of there being no other source and improvement in symptoms on treatment27 through to making a clinical diagnosis using any positive blood culture and temperature, but this may result in over-diagnosis and inappropriate antibiotic stewardship in at least 46%28.
Attempts at non-invasive methods of detecting a CRBSI remain challenging. Immunoglobulin levels to flagellin and lipopolysaccharide do not differentiate CRBSI from any other microbial infection29. A non-specifically unwell patient with a newly abnormal C-reactive protein, albumin, or bilirubin level should raise the index of suspicion30. Other novel methods, including real-time polymerase chain reaction, have been explored but currently do not appear to be adequately sensitive to be used in this setting31.
Treatment of catheter-related bloodstream infection
Maintaining long-term central venous access is of prime importance in type 3 IF such that attempts to salvage an infected CVC are vital, wherever possible. Clearly, in a patient presenting with a suspected CRBSI and in septic shock, immediate blood cultures followed rapidly by CVC removal may be life-saving. Against usual microbiological despondency recommending routine CVC removal in all patients, two recent papers—from the UK21 and the US32—report success in the management of suspected CRBSIs in clinically stable patients with high salvage rates (72.5% and 70%, respectively) with antibiotics and, importantly, low mortality. Both the most commonly isolated and successfully treated microbe was coagulase-negative staphylococci (77.8–79.8%). High salvage rates were also observed with Gram-negative bacteria and poly-microbial infections. Traditionally, fungal CRBSIs are not salvaged, but the US team did demonstrate a very low success rate of 14.2% (6 out of 42)32. There is still some debate surrounding Staphylococcus aureus, but both groups demonstrated success with this species.
Prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection
The reported incidence of CRBSI varies from 0.38 to 11.5 per 1,000 catheter days33,34. Although such variation may certainly relate to varied methods of diagnosis, there is no doubt that the extreme ranges of CRBSI rates result from varied practice in catheter care, particularly around education and training. As patients with IF are so reliant on the preservation of their venous access, the prevention of infections has to be a high priority amongst IF staff and patients, aided by strict protocolised measures for safe connection and disconnection. There is debate as to what impacts the risk of developing a CRBSI, but the number of infusion days35, who manipulates the CVC35,36, and the type of CVC used37 are likely important. Simple measures to reduce CRBSI rates include handwashing12,38 and 2% chlorhexidine cleaning25,39,40. Ethanol locks have been shown to be very effective at reducing CRBSI rates (pre-introduction rates of 4.7–10.2 per 1,000 and post-introduction of 0.36–0.9 per 1,00041–43) but because of the increased risk of catheter occlusion are not currently recommended by the ESPEN12,44. An alternative lock is taurolidine, an antimicrobial derived from the amino acid taurine, and data from open-label studies45, retrospective treatment review32,46,47], and a small randomised controlled trial48 demonstrate better outcomes. A meta-analysis of six randomised controlled trials reporting over 80,000 catheter days from 431 patients acknowledged methodological deficiencies in studies but reported that taurolidine locks compared with heparin locks reduced CRBSI risk by a risk ratio of 0.34 (95% confidence interval 0.21–0.55) without an increase in catheter occlusion (risk ratio 1.99, confidence interval 0.75–5.28)49. In a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 41 high-risk patients with a CRBSI rate of 2.4 per 1,000 were assigned to taurolidine-citrate-heparin lock versus heparin only for 9,622 and 6,956 days, respectively. No CRBSI occurred in the taurolidine-citrate-heparin group compared with 7 CRBSI or 1.0 per 1,000 in the heparin group with associated reduction in CVC removal rate and cost of treatment for a CRBSI50.
Other central venous catheter complications
CVC infections are not limited to the intraluminal or the venous side of a CVC. Infections can also occur in the tunnel portion from where the CVC inserts into the skin until it passes into the vein; such tunnel infections have been reported to occur at a rate of 0.24–0.48 per 1,000 catheter days27,51,52. Treatment usually requires systemic antibiotics but might also require CVC removal. Mechanical CVC complications occur and can be due to occlusion of the CVC or through kinks formed on particular movement or through the CVC falling out. Typically, occlusion occurs at a rate of 0.13–0.49 per 1,000 catheter days36,51,53–57.
CVC-related venous thrombosis (CRVT) occurred in large series at a rate of 0.08–0.2 per 1,000 catheter days58–61, but up to 2 out of 3 may go undetected61. Whilst the aetiology is often unclear, endothelial damage by insertion of the catheter, flow dynamics within the vein, and a hypercoagulable state, including underlying clotting disorders, increase the risk, but, in addition, choline deficiency62 and, as before stated, ethanol locks63 may increase the risk of CRVT. There is currently no good evidence for primary prophylaxis to prevent a CRVT due to the risk of bleeding12. However, once CRVT is diagnosed, treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin or oral anticoagulants, tailored to the patient’s circumstances (for example, absorption ability64), is usually sufficient and this may need to be life-long12. Although loss of venous access is an indication for intestinal transplantation (ITx)65, it is not a common indication. To prevent progression of loss of venous access, more advanced treatment techniques are needed. Thrombolysis is indicated if the CRVT is diagnosed early, with a low risk of bleeding66, but recurrence is high despite initial good resolution and continuing anticoagulation67. With more mature thrombi, fragmentation or thrombectomy may be required to remove the clot and matured occluded veins may need venous recanalization68. Venous stenosis following CRVT may require balloon angioplasty or stenting but also vascular grafts or bypass procedures. All of these novel techniques carry their own risks of morbidity and mortality and need appropriate discussion with the patient and the wider MDT.
Other complications
Intestinal failure-associated liver disease
IFALD is a common complication in children (estimates are 25–50%69) but is far less common in adults, and severe liver dysfunction is observed in less than 5% of patients70,71. The pathophysiology of IFALD is multifactorial and includes intrahepatic inflammation associated with steatohepatitis, sepsis, nutrient deficiencies (choline, taurine, and essential fatty acids), nutrient excesses (lipid, glucose, and protein), dysfunctional biliary system (gall stones and bile acidification), medications, bacterial overgrowth, and other PN components, including plant phytosterols, exposure of PN to sunlight causing hydrogen peroxide production, heavy metals (aluminium, copper, and manganese), and use of polyvinyl chloride (PVC)-containing giving sets20,72. Maintaining enteral intake; replacing missing nutrients; administering cyclical PN; minimising calorie intake with lipids in particular; having lipid-containing mono-unsaturated fatty acids, fish oils, and a mixture of medium- and long-chain triglycerides; and preventing septic episodes, particularly CRBSI, are all thought to aid in protecting the liver20. A common misconception is the suggestion that IFALD is similar to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), but a very helpful review by Buchman et al.73 has detailed the clear differences in clinical, biochemical, histological, and pathophysiological parameters between IFALD and NAFLD. The histological differences are recorded in Table 2, in which very clear patterns are observed in both IFALD and NAFLD73. Where confusion comes, though, is in those patients who develop IF and whose body mass index does not fit the typical patient with IF74. As the international obesity trend continues, there are more patients who will develop more of an overlap picture, especially if they have an antecedal metabolic syndrome, particularly those who have required bariatric surgery and develop subsequent IF75,76.
Table 2. Histological differences observed between intestinal failure-associated liver disease and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Condition | Intestinal failure-associated liver disease | Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease |
---|
Cholestasis | Yes | No |
Steatosis type | Macrovesicular and microvesicular | Mainly macrovesicular |
Steatosis location | Periportal area | Pericentral area |
Biliary tree changes | Obstruction: portal inflammation, oedema, ductal proliferation Ductopaenia | No obstruction No ductopaenia |
Steatohepatitis | Rare | Common |
Fibrosis | “Jigsaw” pattern: commences at portal end, then periportal followed by portal-portal bridging fibrosis then cirrhosis | Sinusoidal; ballooned hepatocytes with Mallory-Denk bodies; typically starts in pericentral area |
Metabolic bone disease
The combination of vitamin D deficiency, the underlying condition (for example, Crohn’s disease), and the mishandling of calcium and phosphate leads to metabolic bone disorders and 41–46% of patients on HPN develop osteoporosis on bone densitometry77,78.
Renal disease
Renal dysfunction due to chronic dehydration is a recognised problem, but patients are also at risk of nephrolithiasis. This is in part due to dehydration, but, in particular, patients with jejunuo-colic anastomosis are at higher risk of oxalate nephropathy due to fatty acids preferentially binding calcium in the small bowel, leaving oxalate free to be absorbed and precipitate in the renal tubules79.
Quality of life and patient-related outcome measures
In children, QoL is comparable to that of healthy peers unless they have abdominal pain, and parental stress is reduced by an increased time from last operation or hospitalisation and increased by abdominal pain and a stool frequency of more than three per day80. Adults report that HPN is a “lifeline” and that QoL is “good” to “wonderful”, and investigators found a strong desire for normalisation of life on HPN81.
Until recently, patient-related outcome measures (PROMs) have typically been defined according to being on PN or nutritional autonomy, being employed or not, or survival. However, there is increasing evidence of a need for better understanding of PROMs, and research is under way to answer that question. The collection of QoL data has been mainly through the HPN-QoL devised by Baxter et al.82. This comprehensive 48-point questionnaire covers so many areas of living with IF that it results in a wealth of data. In addition, the modified ITx-QOL by Pironi and Baxter changes a few key questions to try to match the flow of patient experience across HPN and ITx26. However, many patients find 48 questions quite daunting, and, notably, such health-related QoL questionnaires have principally focussed on impairments and functional limitations that are of interest to health professionals. A recent PROM has been developed (Parenteral Nutrition Impact Questionnaire [PNIQ]) that differs from previous tools, as its items were generated from unstructured qualitative interviews conducted with patients and therefore should provide a more patient-centric assessment of QoL83. Moreover, PNIQ provides a unidimensional index of QoL through only 20 dichotomous items that can be completed within minutes, making it a useful tool for day-to-day clinical practice and also to evaluate the impact of novel CIF therapies on QoL.
Evolving strategies for managing intestinal failure
Growth factors
Many different hormonal treatments have been tried to treat SBS by enhancing intestinal adaptation and absorption and reducing PN requirements in CIF, although frequently the effects are not sustained and patients revert to pretreatment states relatively quickly. Typical treatments include growth hormone84 and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and GLP-2 agonists. The recombinant analogue GLP-2 teduglutide (Shire Pharmaceuticals) was approved in 2012 for the treatment of adults with SBS dependent on PN despite optimal medical therapy. It has been shown to reduce PN requirements in large randomised placebo-controlled studies with open-label extensions85–87. Teduglutide in children over a 12-week study has also demonstrated benefit with reduction of PN volume and calories by 25–41% and 45–50%, respectively, in higher doses of teduglutide (0.025 and 0.05 mg/kg per day) compared with 0% and 1–6% for low dose (0.0125 mg/kg per day) and standard of care; there was a compensatory rise in enteral nutrition volume of 22–40% in teduglutide groups compared with 11% for standard treatment. Four patients achieved independence from PN88. GLP-1 analogues may also offer promise of restoring gut function by applying a gastric emptying brake as noted in an 8-week pilot study of eight patients with SBS given once-daily liraglutide (Novo Nordisk)89. A further pilot study demonstrated enhanced absorption with combination GLP-1 and GLP-2 analogues90.
Intestinal lengthening
Three different intestinal lengthening procedures exist: the Bianchi procedure91, a longitudinal incision of a dilated segment of small bowel to then place two new sections end to end; the serial transverse enteroplasty (STEP)92, diagonal non-occlusive breaks in the dilated small bowel to form an increased length and slower transit time; and the spiral intestinal lengthening and tailoring (SILT)93, a spiral incision around the dilated small bowel then resewn to tailor the length. The majority of articles reporting intestinal lengthening are paediatric reports. One of the largest adult series94 demonstrated, in 20 adults (six Bianchi and 15 STEP; one adult had two procedures) over a 15-year period, that the mean length of gut increased from 60 cm pre-surgery to 80 cm post-surgery and, in 17, 10 (59%) had weaned off PN, and seven achieved increased enteral calorie intake. For the other three, two patients died during the follow-up period and one required an intestinal transplant. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of STEP on enteral tolerance in children included seven case series of 86 children and found that 16 (19%) out of 86 children had no improvement, but there was an increase in enteral tolerance from 35% to 70% following STEP. They gave a summary estimate improvement in 87% of children following STEP95.
Intestinal transplant
Intestinal transplant is a critically important salvage operation to replace lost or diseased gut to prevent the progression of IFALD, to prevent further complications associated with long-term HPN (particularly loss of venous access), and to increase longevity in those with increased risk of death due to IF, such as patients with intra-abdominal desmoids65,96. The grafts include liver-containing grafts (liver-small bowel or multivisceral) or liver-free grafts (isolated small bowel including small bowel and colon or modified multivisceral including stomach, pancreas, small bowel, and colon). Patient survival rates continue to improve, and the last international registry data reported 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival as 76%, 56%, and 43%, respectively97. Yet complications of rejection, graft-versus-host disease, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, and infection still cause constant vigilance for patients and transplant units. Currently, ITx remains a rescue procedure in the face of life-threatening complications owing to the superior survival for patients with HPN. However, as life expectancy following transplantation improves, the balance and timing of transplantation may shift earlier in the disease course as observed in other solid organ transplantation.
Conclusions
IF is an uncommon condition, but the impact on the individual is enormous. The MDT approach to facilitate safe care is paramount to ensuring longevity in these complex patients. In addition, there appears to be a necessity to improve outcomes where prevention is by far better than cure for multiple complications of IF, including CRBSI, venous thrombosis, and IFALD. As growth factors develop, opportunities to wean patients off PN become closer to reality. In the absence of relatively cheap hormonal treatments to facilitate intestinal adaption, surgical rescue procedures are vital to maintain functioning gut: first, as much gut as possible is brought into circuit and then intestinal lengthening and transplant remain important options. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, to reduce many of the surgical catastrophes that ultimately result in patients developing IF, education initiatives and IF centres of excellence play a vital role.
Author contributions
Phillip Allan wrote the manuscript. Simon Lal conceived the work and reviewed and edited the manuscript.
Competing interests
No competing interests were disclosed.
Grant information
The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.
F1000 recommendedReferences
- 1.
Klek S, Forbes A, Gabe S, et al.:
Management of acute intestinal failure: A position paper from the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) Special Interest Group.
Clin Nutr.
2016; 35(6): 1209–18. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 2.
Richards DM, Irving MH:
Cost-utility analysis of home parenteral nutrition.
Br J Surg.
1996; 83(9): 1226–9. PubMed Abstract
- 3.
Cade A, Puntis J:
Economics of home parenteral nutrition.
Pharmacoeconomics.
1997; 12(3): 327–38. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 4.
Richards DM, Deeks JJ, Sheldon TA, et al.:
Home parenteral nutrition: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess.
1997; 1(1): i–iii, 1–59. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 5.
Schalamon J, Mayr JM, Höllwarth ME:
Mortality and economics in short bowel syndrome.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol.
2003; 17(6): 931–42. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 6.
Howard L:
Home parenteral nutrition: survival, cost, and quality of life.
Gastroenterology.
2006; 130(2 Suppl 1): S52–9. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 7.
Tu Duy Khiem-El Aatmani A, Senesse P, Reimund JM, et al.:
Home Parenteral Nutrition: a direct costs study in the approved centres of Montpellier and Strasbourg.
Gastroenterol Clin Biol.
2006; 30(4): 574–9. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 8.
Hendrickson E, Corrigan ML:
Navigating reimbursement for home parenteral nutrition.
Nutr Clin Pract.
2013; 28(5): 566–71. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 9.
Roskott AM, Groen H, Rings EH, et al.:
Cost-effectiveness of intestinal transplantation for adult patients with intestinal failure: a simulation study.
Am J Clin Nutr.
2015; 101(1): 79–86. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 10.
Lal S, Teubner A, Shaffer JL:
Review article: intestinal failure.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
2006; 24(1): 19–31. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 11.
Pironi L, Arends J, Baxter J, et al.:
ESPEN endorsed recommendations. Definition and classification of intestinal failure in adults.
Clin Nutr.
2015; 34(2): 171–80. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 12.
Pironi L, Arends J, Bozzetti F, et al.:
ESPEN guidelines on chronic intestinal failure in adults.
Clin Nutr.
2016; 35(2): 247–307. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 13.
Pironi L, Konrad D, Brandt C, et al.:
Clinical classification of adult patients with chronic intestinal failure due to benign disease: An international multicenter cross-sectional survey.
Clin Nutr.
2017; pii: S0261-5614(17)30152-8. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 14.
Dibb M, Soop M, Teubner A, et al.:
Survival and nutritional dependence on home parenteral nutrition: Three decades of experience from a single referral centre.
Clin Nutr.
2017; 36(2): 570–576. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 15.
Nehme AE:
Nutritional support of the hospitalized patient. The team concept.
JAMA.
1980; 243(19): 1906–8. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 16.
Goldstein M, Braitman LE, Levine GM:
The medical and financial costs associated with termination of a nutrition support nurse.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
2000; 24(6): 323–7. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 17.
Sutton CD, Garcea G, Pollard C, et al.:
The introduction of a nutrition clinical nurse specialist results in a reduction in the rate of catheter sepsis.
Clin Nutr.
2005; 24(2): 220–3. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 18.
Szlagatys-Sidorkiewicz A, Borkowska A, Jankowska A, et al.:
Reorganization of nutritional therapy can markedly reduce the rate of catheter-related blood stream infections in pediatric patients receiving parenteral nutrition - a 7-year prospective follow-up study.
Nutr Hosp.
2014; 31(3): 1116–21. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 19.
Hvas CL, Farrer K, Donaldson E, et al.:
Quality and safety impact on the provision of parenteral nutrition through introduction of a nutrition support team.
Eur J Clin Nutr.
2014; 68(12): 1294–9. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 20.
Dibb M, Teubner A, Theis V, et al.:
Review article: the management of long-term parenteral nutrition.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
2013; 37(6): 587–603. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 21.
Dibb MJ, Abraham A, Chadwick PR, et al.:
Central Venous Catheter Salvage in Home Parenteral Nutrition Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections: Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Data.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
2016; 40(5): 699–704. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 22.
Mirabel-Chambaud E, N'Guyen M, Valdeyron ML, et al.:
Dramatic increase of central venous catheter-related infections associated with a high turnover of the nursing team.
Clin Nutr.
2016; 35(2): 446–52. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 23.
CDC: C.F.D.C.A.P Bloodstream Infection Event (Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection and non-central line-associated Bloodstream Infection). (Atlanta, Georgia, USA). 2017.
- 24.
Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, et al.:
Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
Clin Infect Dis.
2009; 49(1): 1–45. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 25.
Pittiruti M, Hamilton H, Biffi R, et al.:
ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: central venous catheters (access, care, diagnosis and therapy of complications).
Clin Nutr.
2009; 28(4): 365–77. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 26.
Pironi L, Baxter JP, Lauro A, et al.:
Assessment of quality of life on home parenteral nutrition and after intestinal transplantation using treatment-specific questionnaires.
Am J Transplant.
2012; 12(Suppl 4): S60–6. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 27.
Brandt CF, Tribler S, Hvistendahl M, et al.:
Home Parenteral Nutrition in Adult Patients With Chronic Intestinal Failure: Catheter-Related Complications Over 4 Decades at the Main Danish Tertiary Referral Center.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
2016; pii: 0148607116678766. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 28.
Tribler S, Brandt CF, Hvistendahl M, et al.:
Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in Adults Receiving Home Parenteral Nutrition.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
2017; 148607116686290. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 29.
Galloway DP, Troutt ML, Kocoshis SA, et al.:
Increased Anti-Flagellin and Anti-Lipopolysaccharide Immunoglobulins in Pediatric Intestinal Failure: Associations With Fever and Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
2015; 39(5): 562–8. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 30.
Clare A, Teubner A, Shaffer JL:
What information should lead to a suspicion of catheter sepsis in HPN?
Clin Nutr.
2008; 27(4): 552–6. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 31.
Warhurst G, Dunn G, Chadwick P, et al.:
Rapid detection of health-care-associated bloodstream infection in critical care using multipathogen real-time polymerase chain reaction technology: a diagnostic accuracy study and systematic review.
Health Technol Assess.
2015; 19(35): 1–142. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 32.
Davidson JB, Edakkanambeth Varayil J, Okano A, et al.:
Prevention of Subsequent Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection Using Catheter Locks in High-Risk Patients Receiving Home Parenteral Nutrition.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
2017; 41(4): 685–90. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 33.
Dreesen M, Foulon V, Spriet I, et al.:
Epidemiology of catheter-related infections in adult patients receiving home parenteral nutrition: a systematic review.
Clin Nutr.
2013; 32(1): 16–26. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 34.
Zhao VM, Griffith DP, Blumberg HM, et al.:
Characterization of post-hospital infections in adults requiring home parenteral nutrition.
Nutrition.
2013; 29(1): 52–9. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 35.
Bech LF, Drustrup L, Nygaard L, et al.:
Environmental Risk Factors for Developing Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection in Home Parenteral Nutrition Patients: A 6-Year Follow-up Study.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
2016; 40(7): 989–94. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 36.
Bozzetti F, Mariani L, Bertinet DB, et al.:
Central venous catheter complications in 447 patients on home parenteral nutrition: an analysis of over 100.000 catheter days.
Clin Nutr.
2002; 21(6): 475–85. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 37.
Christensen LD, Holst M, Bech LF, et al.:
Comparison of complications associated with peripherally inserted central catheters and Hickman™ catheters in patients with intestinal failure receiving home parenteral nutrition. Six-year follow up study.
Clin Nutr.
2016; 35(4): 912–7. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 38.
Ryder M:
Evidence-based practice in the management of vascular access devices for home parenteral nutrition therapy.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
2006; 30(Suppl 1): S82–93, S98–9. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 39.
Maki DG, Ringer M, Alvarado CJ:
Prospective randomised trial of povidone-iodine, alcohol, and chlorhexidine for prevention of infection associated with central venous and arterial catheters.
Lancet.
1991; 338(8763): 339–43. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 40.
Pichler J, Soothill J, Hill S:
Reduction of blood stream infections in children following a change to chlorhexidine disinfection of parenteral nutrition catheter connectors.
Clin Nutr.
2014; 33(1): 85–9. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 41.
Wales PW, Kosar C, Carricato M, et al.:
Ethanol lock therapy to reduce the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections in home parenteral nutrition patients with intestinal failure: preliminary experience.
J Pediatr Surg.
2011; 46(5): 951–6. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 42.
Ralls MW, Blackwood RA, Arnold MA, et al.:
Drug shortage-associated increase in catheter-related blood stream infection in children.
Pediatrics.
2012; 130(5): e1369–73. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 43.
Mokha JS, Davidovics ZH, Samela K, et al.:
Effects of Ethanol Lock Therapy on Central Line Infections and Mechanical Problems in Children With Intestinal Failure.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
2017; 41(4): 625–31. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 44.
Mermel LA, Alang N:
Adverse effects associated with ethanol catheter lock solutions: a systematic review.
J Antimicrob Chemother.
2014; 69(10): 2611–9. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 45.
Jurewitsch B, Jeejeebhoy KN:
Taurolidine lock: the key to prevention of recurrent catheter-related bloodstream infections.
Clin Nutr.
2005; 24(3): 462–5. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 46.
Al-Amin AH, Sarveswaran J, Wood JM, et al.:
Efficacy of taurolidine on the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients on home parenteral nutrition.
J Vasc Access.
2013; 14(4): 379–82. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 47.
Olthof ED, Versleijen MW, Huisman-de Waal G, et al.:
Taurolidine lock is superior to heparin lock in the prevention of catheter related bloodstream infections and occlusions.
PLoS One.
2014; 9(11): e111216. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 48.
Bisseling TM, Willems MC, Versleijen MW, et al.:
Taurolidine lock is highly effective in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients on home parenteral nutrition: a heparin-controlled prospective trial.
Clin Nutr.
2010; 29(4): 464–8. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 49.
Liu Y, Zhang AQ, Cao L, et al.:
Taurolidine lock solutions for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
PLoS One.
2013; 8(11): e79417. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 50.
Tribler S, Brandt CF, Petersen AH, et al.:
Taurolidine-citrate-heparin lock reduces catheter-related bloodstream infections in intestinal failure patients dependent on home parenteral support: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Am J Clin Nutr.
2017; 106(3): 839–848. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 51.
Crispin A, Thul P, Arnold D, et al.:
Central venous catheter complications during home parenteral nutrition: a prospective pilot study of 481 patients with more than 30,000 catheter days.
Onkologie.
2008; 31(11): 605–9. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 52.
Cotogni P, Pittiruti M, Barbero C, et al.:
Catheter-related complications in cancer patients on home parenteral nutrition: a prospective study of over 51,000 catheter days.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
2013; 37(3): 375–83. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 53.
Messing B, Landais P, Goldfarb B, et al.:
Home parenteral nutrition in adults: a multicentre survey in Europe.
Clin Nutr.
1989; 8(1): 3–9. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 54.
Galandiuk S, O'Neill M, McDonald P, et al.:
A century of home parenteral nutrition for Crohn's disease.
Am J Surg.
1990; 159(6): 540–4; discussion 544–5. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 55.
Mukau L, Talamini MA, Sitzmann JV, et al.:
Long-term central venous access vs other home therapies: complications in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
1992; 16(5): 455–9. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 56.
Beau P, Matrat S:
A comparative study of polyurethane and silicone cuffed-catheters in long-term home total parenteral nutrition patients.
Clin Nutr.
1999; 18(3): 175–7. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 57.
Bonifacio R, Alfonsi L, Santarpia L, et al.:
Clinical outcome of long-term home parenteral nutrition in non-oncological patients: a report from two specialised centres.
Intern Emerg Med.
2007; 2(3): 188–95. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 58.
Ugur A, Marashdeh BH, Gottschalck I, et al.:
Home parenteral nutrition in Denmark in the period from 1996 to 2001.
Scand J Gastroenterol.
2006; 41(4): 401–7. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 59.
Diamanti A, Basso MS, Castro M, et al.:
Prevalence of life-threatening complications in pediatric patients affected by intestinal failure.
Transplant Proc.
2007; 39(5): 1632–3. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 60.
Dibb M, Carlson G, Abraham A, et al.:
OC-034 Salvage of central venous catheters in HPN catheter-related blood stream infections is safe and effective: 18 years experience from a national centre.
Gut.
2012; 61: A14–15. Publisher Full Text
- 61.
Cuerda C, Joly F, Corcos O, et al.:
Prospective study of catheter-related central vein thrombosis in home parenteral nutrition patients with benign disease using serial venous Doppler ultrasound.
Clin Nutr.
2016; 35(1): 153–7. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 62.
Buchman AL, Ament ME, Jenden DJ, et al.:
Choline deficiency is associated with increased risk for venous catheter thrombosis.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
2006; 30(4): 317–20. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 63.
Abu-El-Haija M, Schultz J, Rahhal RM:
Effects of 70% ethanol locks on rates of central line infection, thrombosis, breakage, and replacement in pediatric intestinal failure.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
2014; 58(6): 703–8. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 64.
Hakeam HA, Al-Sanea N:
Effect of major gastrointestinal tract surgery on the absorption and efficacy of direct acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs).
J Thromb Thrombolysis.
2017; 43(3): 343–51. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 65.
Loo L, Vrakas G, Reddy S, et al.:
Intestinal transplantation: a review.
Curr Opin Gastroenterol.
2017; 33(3): 203–11. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 66.
Crawford JD, Liem TK, Moneta GL:
Management of catheter-associated upper extremity deep venous thrombosis.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord.
2016; 4(3): 375–9. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 67.
Baumann Kreuziger L, Jaffray J, Carrier M:
Epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of catheter-related thrombosis in children and adults.
Thromb Res.
2017; 157: 64–71. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 68.
Elayi CS, Allen CL, Leung S, et al.:
Inside-out access: a new method of lead placement for patients with central venous occlusions.
Heart Rhythm.
2011; 8(6): 851–7. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 69.
Lauriti G, Zani A, Aufieri R, et al.:
Incidence, prevention, and treatment of parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis and intestinal failure-associated liver disease in infants and children: a systematic review.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
2014; 38(1): 70–85. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 70.
Beath SV, Kelly DA:
Total Parenteral Nutrition-Induced Cholestasis: Prevention and Management.
Clin Liver Dis.
2016; 20(1): 159–76. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 71.
Salvino R, Ghanta R, Seidner DL, et al.:
Liver failure is uncommon in adults receiving long-term parenteral nutrition.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
2006; 30(3): 202–8. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 72.
Raphael BP, Duggan C:
Prevention and treatment of intestinal failure-associated liver disease in children.
Semin Liver Dis.
2012; 32(4): 341–7. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 73.
Buchman AL, Naini BV, Spilker B:
The Differentiation of Intestinal-Failure-Associated Liver Disease from Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.
Semin Liver Dis.
2017; 37(1): 33–44. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 74.
Tjellesen L, Staun M, Nielsen PK:
Body composition changes measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition.
Scand J Gastroenterol.
1997; 32(7): 686–90. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 75.
Allan PJ, Stevens P, Abraham A, et al.:
Outcome of intestinal failure after bariatric surgery: experience from a national UK referral centre.
Eur J Clin Nutr.
2016; 70(7): 772–8. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 76.
van Gossum A, Pironi L, Chambrier C, et al.:
Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) in patients with post-bariatric surgery complications.
Clin Nutr.
2017; 36(5): 1345–8. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 77.
Pironi L, Labate AM, Pertkiewicz M, et al.:
Prevalence of bone disease in patients on home parenteral nutrition.
Clin Nutr.
2002; 21(4): 289–96. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 78.
Raman M, Aghdassi E, Baun M, et al.:
Metabolic bone disease in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition: a Canadian study and review.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
2006; 30(6): 492–6. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 79.
Nightingale JM, Lennard-Jones JE, Gertner DJ, et al.:
Colonic preservation reduces need for parenteral therapy, increases incidence of renal stones, but does not change high prevalence of gall stones in patients with a short bowel.
Gut.
1992; 33(11): 1493–7. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 80.
Mutanen A, Kosola S, Merras-Salmio L, et al.:
Long-term health-related quality of life of patients with pediatric onset intestinal failure.
J Pediatr Surg.
2015; 50(11): 1854–8. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 81.
Winkler MF, Hagan E, Wetle T, et al.:
An exploration of quality of life and the experience of living with home parenteral nutrition.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
2010; 34(4): 395–407. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 82.
Baxter JP, Fayers PM, McKinlay AW:
The clinical and psychometric validation of a questionnaire to assess the quality of life of adult patients treated with long-term parenteral nutrition.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
2010; 34(2): 131–42. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 83.
Wilburn J, McKenna SP, Heaney A, et al.:
Development and validation of the Parenteral Nutrition Impact Questionnaire (PNIQ), a patient-centric outcome measure for Home Parenteral Nutrition.
Clin Nutr.
2017; pii: S0261-5614(17)30127-9. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 84.
Seguy D, Darmaun D, Duhamel A, et al.:
Growth hormone enhances fat-free mass and glutamine availability in patients with short-bowel syndrome: an ancillary double-blind, randomized crossover study.
Am J Clin Nutr.
2014; 100(3): 850–8. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 85.
Jeppesen PB, Gilroy R, Pertkiewicz M, et al.:
Randomised placebo-controlled trial of teduglutide in reducing parenteral nutrition and/or intravenous fluid requirements in patients with short bowel syndrome.
Gut.
2011; 60(7): 902–14. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 86.
O'Keefe SJ, Jeppesen PB, Gilroy R, et al.:
Safety and efficacy of teduglutide after 52 weeks of treatment in patients with short bowel intestinal failure.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2013; 11(7): 815–23.e1–3. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 87.
Schwartz LK, O'Keefe SJ, Fujioka K, et al.:
Long-Term Teduglutide for the Treatment of Patients With Intestinal Failure Associated With Short Bowel Syndrome.
Clin Transl Gastroenterol.
2016; 7: e142. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 88.
Carter BA, Cohran VC, Cole CR, et al.:
Outcomes from a 12-Week, Open-Label, Multicenter Clinical Trial of Teduglutide in Pediatric Short Bowel Syndrome.
J Pediatr.
2017; 181: 102–111.e5. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 89.
Hvistendahl M, Brandt CF, Tribler S, et al.:
Effect of Liraglutide Treatment on Jejunostomy Output in Patients With Short Bowel Syndrome: An Open-Label Pilot Study.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
2016; 148607116672265. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 90.
Madsen KB, Askov-Hansen C, Naimi RM, et al.:
Acute effects of continuous infusions of glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1, GLP-2 and the combination (GLP-1+GLP-2) on intestinal absorption in short bowel syndrome (SBS) patients. A placebo-controlled study.
Regul Pept.
2013; 184: 30–9. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 91.
Bianchi A:
Intestinal loop lengthening--a technique for increasing small intestinal length.
J Pediatr Surg.
1980; 15(2): 145–51. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 92.
Kim HB, Fauza D, Garza J, et al.:
Serial transverse enteroplasty (STEP): a novel bowel lengthening procedure.
J Pediatr Surg.
2003; 38(3): 425–9. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 93.
Cserni T, Biszku B, Guthy I, et al.:
The first clinical application of the spiral intestinal lengthening and tailoring (silt) in extreme short bowel syndrome.
J Gastrointest Surg.
2014; 18(10): 1852–7. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 94.
Yannam GR, Sudan DL, Grant W, et al.:
Intestinal lengthening in adult patients with short bowel syndrome.
J Gastrointest Surg.
2010; 14(12): 1931–6. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 95.
Fernandes MA, Usatin D, Allen IE, et al.:
Improved enteral tolerance following step procedure: systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
Pediatr Surg Int.
2016; 32(10): 921–6. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 96.
Harrison E, Allan P, Ramu A, et al.:
Management of intestinal failure in inflammatory bowel disease: small intestinal transplantation or home parenteral nutrition?
World J Gastroenterol.
2014; 20(12): 3153–63. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 97.
Grant D, Abu-Elmagd K, Mazariegos G, et al.:
Intestinal transplant registry report: global activity and trends.
Am J Transplant.
2015; 15(1): 210–9. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
Comments on this article Comments (0)