The validation of a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and the effect of freeze-thaw cycles of serum on the stability of cortisol and testosterone concentrations in Aceh cattle

Gholib Gholib; Sri Wahyuni; Muslim Akmal; Muhammad Hasan; Muhammad Agil; Bambang Purwantara

doi:10.12688/f1000research.19804.3

Home Browse The validation of a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and...

ALL Metrics

Views

Downloads

Get PDF

Get XML

Export

▬

✚

Research Article

Revised

The validation of a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and the effect of freeze-thaw cycles of serum on the stability of cortisol and testosterone concentrations in Aceh cattle

[version 3; peer review: 2 approved]

Gholib Gholib ¹, Sri Wahyuni², Muslim Akmal³, Muhammad Hasan⁴, Muhammad Agil⁵, Bambang Purwantara⁵

Gholib Gholib ¹, Sri Wahyuni², [...] Muslim Akmal³, Muhammad Hasan⁴, Muhammad Agil⁵, Bambang Purwantara⁵

PUBLISHED 06 Mar 2020

Author details Author details

¹ Physiology Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Aceh, 23111, Indonesia
² Anatomy Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Aceh, 23111, Indonesia
³ Histology Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Aceh, 23111, Indonesia
⁴ Clinical Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Aceh, 23111, Indonesia
⁵ Department of Veterinary Clinic Reproduction and Pathology, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, Jawa Barat, 16680, Indonesia

Gholib Gholib
Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Sri Wahyuni
Roles: Conceptualization, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing

Muslim Akmal
Roles: Data Curation, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing

Muhammad Hasan
Roles: Data Curation, Resources

Muhammad Agil
Roles: Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing

Bambang Purwantara
Roles: Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing

OPEN PEER REVIEW

REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Background: To obtain accurate measurements of cortisol (C) and testosterone (T) in Aceh cattle, commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits need to be carefully validated. Moreover, repeated freeze-thaw cycles during the storage of the samples may affect the stability of the hormones in the serum. Here, the reliability of C and T concentration measurements in the serum of Aceh cattle, was tested using commercial C and T ELISA kits designed to measure human C and T concentrations. Further, the effect of repeated freeze-thaw cycles on the stability of C and T concentrations in the serum was evaluated.
Methods: Commercial C (Cat. no. EIA-1887) and T (Cat. no. EIA-1559) ELISA kits from DRG Instruments GmbH were validated through an analytical validation test (i.e., parallelism, accuracy, and precision) and a biological validation test (for C: effect of transportation on the C secretion; for T: the concentrations of T between bulls and cows). To test the effects of freeze-thaw cycles, cattle serum was subjected to the following treatments: (i) remained frozen at -20^OC (control group); (ii) exposed to freeze-thaw cycles for two, four, six, and eight times (test groups).
Results: Parallelism, accuracy, and precision tests showed that both C and T ELISA kits adequately measured C and T in the serum of Aceh cattle. Concentrations of C post-transportation were significantly higher than pre-transportation (p<0.01). Concentrations of T in bulls were significantly higher than in cows (p<0.01). After four to eight freeze-thaw cycles, C concentrations were significantly lower compared to the control group (all p < 0.05). In contrast, T concentrations remained stable (all p>0.05).
Conclusions: Commercial C (EIA-1887) and T (EIA-1559) ELISA kits are reliable assays for measuring serum C and T, respectively, in Aceh cattle. Repeated freeze-thaw cycles significantly affected the stability of serum C, but did not for T.

Keywords

aceh cattle, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, cortisol, testosterone, analytical validation, biological validation, hormone stability, repeated freezing and re-thawing

Corresponding author: Gholib Gholib

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information: This study was funded by The Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education, Indonesia [215/SP2H/LT/DPRM/2019]. This paper also supported by USAID through Sustainable Higher Education Research Alliances (SHERA) Program - Center for Collaborative Research Animal Biotechnology and Coral Reef Fisheries (CCR ANBIOCORE).
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Copyright: © 2020 Gholib G et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite: Gholib G, Wahyuni S, Akmal M et al. The validation of a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and the effect of freeze-thaw cycles of serum on the stability of cortisol and testosterone concentrations in Aceh cattle [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2020, 8:1220 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.19804.3) First published: 30 Jul 2019, 8:1220 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.19804.1) Latest published: 06 Mar 2020, 8:1220 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.19804.3)

Revised Amendments from Version 2

In this version, each objective was added with the hypothesis. Explanations of sample one and sample two used for parallelism test were added. Some grammatical errors and typing errors have been improved. The article has been changed according to the minor comments and suggestions from the reviewers.

See the authors' detailed response to the review by Pudji Astuti
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Annaïs Carbajal

Introduction

Cortisol (C) and testosterone (T) are steroid hormones. Cortisol is produced by the adrenal cortex¹, while T is produced by the Leydig cells in the testes² and also secreted in the adrenal cortex and ovaries in the small amounts³. Cortisol has a key role in physiological stress responses. Accordingly, this hormone is commonly used as an indicator of stress⁴. On the other hand, T plays an important role in male reproduction physiology. Thus, T concentrations can be used to assess male gonadal function². Measuring C and T concentrations can be used to monitor stress and reproduction in order to support the breeding management, because high concentrations of C can suppress the T production².

Steroid hormones can be measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique using various samples (e.g., plasma or serum⁵, urine⁶, feces^7,8, saliva^9,10, and hair¹¹). This technique is now widely used, as it is simple, rapid, convenient, relatively inexpensive, requires a lower sample volume, and particularly, as it is free of radioisotope waste^12,13. Moreover, the availability of commercial ELISA kits makes it easy to apply this technique. However, because many commercial ELISA kits are usually designed for humans, using them for animals must be done with great caution and measurements are only trustworthy after the validation of the assay¹⁴.

In order to reliably measure C and T concentrations in cattle using a human commercial ELISA kit, the ELISA kit needs to be validated analytically, physiologically or biologically^5,15. Analytical validation can be performed by examining the specificity (cross-reactions), sensitivity, precision, and parallelism (linearity) of the ELISA kit^1,5. In addition, it is crucial to perform the biological validation of the assay to examine the ability of the assay to differentiate the variation of the hormone concentration based on the physiological conditions of the animals¹⁵. The biological validation of T measurements can be achieved by comparing the concentrations of T from individuals of different age (juvenile versus adult), or sex (male versus female) classes⁵. For C measurements, the comparison of C concentrations of the same animal before and after some known stressful events (eg., capture, translocation, transportation, and agonistic interactions) can be used as a biological validation procedure¹⁵.

Another critical issue for hormone measurements is the repeated freezing and re-thawing of the samples (freeze-thaw cycles) during the storage prior to the analyses¹⁶. Freezing the serum or plasma at -20°C or lower is an ideal storage method¹⁷. However, power outages frequently occur, particularly in developing countries, and they can last for a few hours up to a day. Manuals of commercial ELISA kits always explicitly warn to avoid freeze-thaw cycles, because repeated freezing and re-thawing of the samples may affect the stability of the hormones in the serum or plasma, for example: insulin in rats¹⁸; adrenocorticotropic hormone in humans¹⁹; and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), progesterone, estrone, estradiol, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) in humans^20,21. Conversely, several studies have reported no effect of repeated freeze-thaw cycles on the stability of hormone concentrations, such as progesterone in female dogs (bitches)²² and DHEAS, C, dihydrotestosterone, T, estradiol, and progesterone in humans^23,24. These different results suggest that the stability may depend on the number of cycles, duration of cycles, and temperature during the repeated freezing and rethawing, species-specific differences, as well as on the type of hormones measured.

In 2011, the Ministry of Agriculture of Indonesia declared Aceh cattle to be a native Indonesian genome resource. This type of cattle can adapt well to the tropical environment and is important for meat production. Increasing the Aceh cattle population is very important for the fulfillment of the protein requirements of the human population in the Aceh region. In this respect, the measurement of C and T can be used for informing husbandry management and breeding programs for this animal. In preparation for the first study to monitor reproduction and stress physiology of Aceh cattle, the reliability of commercial C and T ELISA kits designed for human serum/plasma was tested to measure C and T concentrations in the serum of Aceh cattle. The objectives of the present study were: First, conduct an analytical validation test to examine the reliability of commercial C (Cat. no. EIA-1887) and T (Cat. no. EIA-1559) ELISA kits that accurately measure C and T concentrations, respectively in Aceh cattle; Second, perform a biological validation test to examine the reliability of commercial C ELISA kit (Cat. no. EIA-1887) to the response a stress event by comparing C concentrations before and after transportation and the reliability of T ELISA kit (Cat. no. EIA-1559) in discriminating the T concentrations from different sexes (bulls versus cows). Finally, the third objective of the study was to evaluate the stability of C and T concentrations in the serum of Aceh cattle after exposure to several repeated freeze-thaw cycles. The hypotheses are that 1) commercial C ELISA kit (Cat. no. EIA-1887) and T ELISA kit (Cat. no. EIA-1559) are reliable assays to measure C and T concentrations in the serum of Aceh cattle; 2) concentration of C should be higher following transportation and the T concentration should be higher in bulls; and 3) repeated freeze-thaw cycles affect the stability of C and T concentrations in the serum of Aceh cattle.

Methods

Ethical statement

The Institutional Committee of Animal Ethics of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala approved the use of all experimental animals in this study (Ref: 33/KEPH/VI/2019)²⁵ (see Extended data). All efforts were made to ameliorate harm to the animals, such as: cattle were placed in the clamp cage to ensure quick, easy and safe collection of the blood sample causing minimal distress; blood samples were collected via the jugular vein without sedation, causing minimal distress. During the study, a member of the study team, accompanied by a veterinarian, observed their behavior for signs of excessive distress or sickness. None of the procedures performed in this study resulted in distress, sickness behavior or weight loss.

Study animals

Samples were collected from 32 adult Aceh cattle consisting of 16 adult males (bulls), and 16 adult females (cows). The age of the cattle ranged from two to five years old, and weighing 150–300 kg. Samples were collected during two weeks in April 2019 and three weeks in November 2019. For the biological validation test of T ELISA kit, all cattle (16 bulls and 16 cows) were used, whereas for the biological validation of C ELISA kit, 16 cattle (8 bulls and 8 cows) were used. This sample size was calculated based on Federer’s formula: (t-1)(n-1) ≥ 15, where t is the number of treatments and n is the number of animals. The sample size calculated using this formula is 16. Sixteen bulls and 10 cows were sampled from a smallholder farmer at Darussalam, Aceh Besar, Aceh Province. These cattle were housed in stables, with each cattle was separated by a wooden partition (individual housing system). Six cows were sampled from a teaching farm (UPT hewan coba), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh. These cows were housed together in stables (colony housing system). Cattle housing was equipped with feed and water troughs. Feed and water were consumed by the cattle ad libitum. Feed given to the cattle is grass at 10% of body weight and 1% of body weight of rice bran and tofu dregs.

Collection and processing of blood samples

Blood samples (around 5 ml per animal) were collected by a veterinarian from the jugular vein using standard operating procedures without sedation. For the biological validation of C, blood samples were collected in the afternoon (16.00 to 18.00), four hours after transportation, while for the biological validation of T, blood samples were collected in the morning (06.00 to 08.00). Afterward, the blood was allowed to clot at room temperature for between 30 minutes to 2 hours. Then, the serum was separated from the red blood cells by centrifugation at 1200xg for 10 minutes at 4°C. After that, the supernatant (serum) was immediately transferred to polypropylene tubes (Eppendorf Safe-Lock tubes) and stored at -20°C until hormone measurements.

Validation of commercial C and T ELISA kits

To test the capability of the commercial C and T ELISA kits in quantifying concentrations of T and C in the serum of Aceh cattle, the commercial C (Cat. no. EIA-1887) and T (Cat. no. EIA-1559) ELISA kits produced by DRG Instruments GmbH, Germany, were evaluated using analytical and biological validations. The procedure for assay validation was conducted as described by Rangel-Negrin et al.¹⁵ and Gholib et al.⁵. Briefly, the analytical validation was comprised of parallelism (i.e. running serial dilution of Aceh cattle serum 1:2 to 1:16, assayed together with C and T standards, and comparing the slope of expected dose versus percent bound of diluted Aceh cattle serum with the slope of C and T standards), accuracy (i.e. adding known quantities of hormone to C and T standards and calculating the percentage of recovery), and precision (i.e., measuring some low-quality controls (QC L) and high-quality controls (QC H) in one microplate to calculate intra-assay coefficients of variation (CV) and some QC L and QC H in several microplates to calculate inter-assay CV. The sensitivity was reported as provided by the manufacturer.

For the biological validation of C, we examined the effects of transportation on the C secretion. We used 16 of the Aceh cattle described above (eight bulls and eight cows). Bulls and cows were transported using different road vehicles (open car) around Banda Aceh at 11.00 for an hour (~40 km/hour). During transportation, cattle were secured using a rope around their neck and bulls and cows were transported using different vehicles. For pre-transportation samples, blood samples were collected a day before transporting the cattle at 06.00 to 08.00. For post-transportation samples, blood samples were collected four hours after transportation at 16.00 to 18.00. Blood samples were then processed as described above. For the biological validation of T, we compared the concentrations of T from 16 bulls and 16 cows. For this purpose, blood sample was collected once for each cattle in the morning at 06.00 to 08.00.

Experiment design of freeze-thaw cycles

To evaluate the stability of C and T concentrations in serum exposed to repeated freeze-thaw cycles, we took seven serum samples (three bulls and four cows) collected from the previous experiment (biological validation of C and T) to be used for the freeze-thaw cycle experiment, in order to avoid several blood sample collections. Each serum sample was then divided into five aliquots and transferred into 1.5 ml micro-tubes (Eppendorf Safe-Lock tubes; total 35 aliquots; 0.2 ml per tube), closed tightly and sealed with parafilm. All aliquots were subsequently stored frozen at -20°C. Later, those aliquots were subjected to the following treatments: (i) aliquots remained frozen at -20°C until the time of hormone analysis as a control group (N=7); and (ii) aliquots were exposed to repeated freeze-thaw cycles for two, four, six, and eight cycles as test groups (N=7 for each group). The serum was thawed for six hours by placing the tube in a room without an air conditioner (mean ± standard deviation of temperature 27.6±0.7°C). Afterward, the serum was refrozen for 24 hours prior to re-thawing. After all freeze-thaw cycles were completed, C and T concentrations were measured for all serum samples together.

C and T concentration measurements

The concentration of C was measured using a commercial C ELISA kit (Cat. no. EIA-1887, DRG Instruments GmbH, Germany). The assay utilizes a monoclonal anti-cortisol antibody and C labeled with horseradish peroxidase as an enzyme conjugate. The measurement of C was conducted following the instructions of the manufacturer (DRG diagnostics). In brief, 20 μl of each standard, control, and samples (serum) in duplicate were dispensed with new disposable tips into appropriate wells on a microplate coated with C monoclonal antibody. After that, each microplate well was filled with 200 μl enzyme conjugate, thoroughly mixed, and then incubated for 60 minutes at room temperature. After incubation, the solution in the wells was briskly shaken out and rinsed out with 350 μl diluted washing solution per well four times. Furthermore, 100 μl substrate solution (tetramethylbenzidine) was added to each well of the microplate, which was then re-incubated for 15–20 minutes at room temperature. After that, the enzymatic reaction was stopped by adding 100 μl of stop solution (0.5 M H₂SO₄) to each well. Finally, absorbance was determined by using an ELISA reader (xMark™ Microplate Absorbance Spectrophotometer, Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.) at 450 nm. The C concentration was then calculated using the Microplate Manager^® 6 Software (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.).

The concentration of T was measured using a commercial T ELISA kit (Cat. no. EIA-1559, DRG Instruments GmbH, Germany). The assay utilizes a mouse monoclonal anti-testosterone antibody and T labeled with horseradish peroxidase as an enzyme conjugate. This assay has been previously validated successfully for measuring T concentrations in Kacang goats⁵. Testosterone measurements were conducted following the instructions of the manufacturer (DRG diagnostics) and as described by Gholib et al.⁵. In brief, 25 μl of each standard, control, and samples (serum) in duplicate were dispensed with new disposable tips into appropriate wells on a microplate coated with T monoclonal antibody. After that, each microplate well was filled with 200 μl enzyme conjugate, thoroughly mixed, and then incubated for 60 minutes at room temperature. Following this, the microplates were treated and absorbance was measured as described above for C.

Data analysis

Normality distribution of the data was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test prior to statistical analysis. For the analytical validation, the parallelism between serial dilutions of two selected serum samples and standard curves was determined by a test of equality of two slopes using Logarithmic Regression²⁶. For the biological validation, C data before and after transportation and T data of bulls and cows showed a normal distribution (p>0.05). A paired t-test was used for C, whereas for T, an independent t-test was used. For the freeze-thaw cycles experiments, the proportion of change in C and T concentrations relative to the control was calculated as (a_n– x_n/x_n) x 100, where a_n is the nth sample value in each freeze-thaw cycles series (two, four, six, eight times) and x_n is the value at time zero (control) of the nth sample^8,16. The C data were normally distributed (p>0.05), whereas the T data was not (p<0.05). Therefore, for C, a one-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by post hoc analysis using the Bonferroni test was conducted, whereas a Friedman repeated-measures ANOVA on ranks was set up to analyze T concentrations⁸. We used SigmaPlot 11.0 to create graphs and IBM SPSS 20 to carry out the statistical analysis. All statistical tests were two-tailed and the significance level was set at 0.05.

Results

The validity of commercial ELISA kits for measuring C and T in the serum of cattle

The serial dilution of the selected serum (for C: serum of post-transportation / sample one, and serum of pre-transportation /sample two; for T: serum of bull 1 / sample one, and serum of bull 2 / sample two) showed displacement curves that were parallel to C and T standard curves (Figure 1). From dose-response curve, the value of slope on C standard, sample one, and sample two were -20.106, -18.827, and -19.433, respectively. The test of equality of two slopes showed that the slope of C standard was parallel or not significantly different with the slope of sample one (t = -0.218, p = 0.462) and slope of sample two (t = -0.674, p = 0.443; Table 1). Similar results were also obtained for T. Slope of T standard (b = -21.584) was parallel or not significantly different with slope of sample one (b = -17.373, t = -0.067, p = 0.332) and slope of sample two (b = -21.480, t = 0.376, p = 0.212; Table 1). The parallelism, dose-response, accuracy, and precision (coefficients of variation/CV of intra-and inter-assay) are presented in Table 1.

Figure 1. Curves of parallelism test from the serial dilution of tested samples (serum of Aceh cattle) and cortisol and testosterone standards are presented.

a) Cortisol (C) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit: serum of post-transportation / sample one (white circle) and serum of pre-transportation / sample two (black triangle down) were diluted 1:2 to 1:16 in assay buffer and measured with serial C standards (black circle) ranging from 10 to 400 ng/ml. The curve of sample one, sample two, and C standards produced almost identical R² values: 0.987, 0.945, and 0.992, respectively. b) Testosterone (T) ELISA kit: serum of bull 1 / sample one (white circle) and serum of bull 2 / sample two (black triangle down) were diluted 1:2 to 1:16 in assay buffer and measured with serial T standards (black circle) ranging from 0.5 to 16 ng/ml. The curve of sample one, sample two, and T standards produced almost identical R² values: 0.964, 0.993, and 0.945, respectively.

Table 1. Results of the analytical validation of the commercial cortisol (DRG, Cat. No. EIA-1887) and testosterone (DRG, Cat. No. EIA-1559) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits.

Measured parameters	Cortisol ELISA kit	Testosterone ELISA kit
Parallelism
- Standard with sample one	Parallel, t = -0.218, p = 0.462	Parallel, t = -0.067, p = 0.332
- Standard with sample two	Parallel, t = -0.674, p = 0.443	Parallel, t = 0.376, p=0.212
Dose response curve
- Sample one	y = -18.827 Ln (x) + 25.050 R² = 0.987, p = 0.006	y = -17.373 Ln (x) + 43.792 R² = 0.964 , p = 0.018
- Sample two	y = -19.433 Ln (x) + 30.350 R² = 0.945, p = 0.028	y = -21,480 Ln (x) + 29.218 R² = 0.993, p = 0.003
- Standard	y = -20.106 Ln (x) + 138.345 R² = 0.992, p = 0.005	y = -21,584 Ln (x) + 95.239 R² = 0.945, p = 0.004
Accuracy±SD (%) (N=6)	104.89 ± 7.09	103.37 ± 9.62
Coefficient variation (CV) of intra-assay (%)
- Low-quality control (N=6)	8.40	7.32
- High-quality control (N=6)	4.86	6.62
Coefficient variation (CV) of inter-assay (%)
- Low-quality control (N=6)	12.45	10.70
- High-quality control (N=6)	6.80	8.91
Sensitivity (ng/ml)^a	2.5	0.083

^a = value in the manual protocol of assay from manufacturer

The mean (± SD) of the C concentrations in the samples post-transportation (34.81 ± 12.38 ng/ml) was significantly higher compared to pre-transportation samples (27.83 ± 9.22 ng/ml; t = -4.670, p = 0.000; Figure 2A). The mean (± SD) of the T concentrations in bulls (4.39 ± 1.41 ng/ml) was significantly higher than the T concentrations in cows (0.63 ± 0.24 ng/ml; t = 10.552, p = 0.000; Figure 2B). Results on the analytical and biological validations indicated that both C and T ELISA kits were reliable assays for measuring C and T concentrations in serum of Aceh cattle. Raw values of analytical validation results are given in Dataset 1²⁷, whereas raw values of biological validation results are given in Dataset 2 v2²⁸ (see Underlying data).

Figure 2. Results of the biological validation of the commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits.

a) Concentrations of cortisol (C) before (pre-trans) and after (post-trans) transportation measured using a commercial C ELISA kit (DRG, Cat. No. EIA-1887). b) Concentrations of testosterone (T) in bulls and cows measured using a commercial T ELISA kit (DRG, Cat. No. EIA-1559). Different superscripts above line symbols and histogram indicate a significant difference between groups (p < 0.05).

C and T stabilities after exposure to repeated freeze-thaw cycles

Repeated freeze-thaw cycles in serum significantly affected the stability of C concentrations (F[4,30] = 11.681, p<0.001, N=7). Post hoc analysis showed that after four to eight freeze-thaw cycles, the C concentrations were significantly lower than those of the control group (all p < 0.05; Figure 3A). In contrast to the C concentrations, the T concentrations remained stable after exposure to two to eight freeze-thaw cycles (χ²[4] = 7.626, p = 0.106, N = 7; Figure 3B). The mean percentage of change in C and T concentrations ranged between 13.43 to 33.94% and 3.55 to 8.33%, respectively, relative to the control group (Figure 3). Raw values of C and T concentrations are given in Dataset 3²⁹ (see Underlying data).

Figure 3. Percentages of hormone concentrations in the serum exposed to repeated freeze-thaw cycles compared to control.

a) Cortisol (C). b) Testosterone (T). Values represent mean±SD relative to control (100%). Different superscripts above histogram indicate a significant difference between groups (p < 0.05).

Discussion

The current study demonstrates that C and T concentrations in the serum of Aceh cattle can be accurately measured using the commercial C and T ELISA kits designed for human C and T measurements. The results of the parallelism test show that the slope of the diluted sample curves was parallel to the standard curves of commercial C and T ELISA kits. In addition, concentrations of C and T decreased significantly following the dilution levels. Furthermore, these assays also show high accuracy (~100%) and precision (CV < 10% and < 15% for intra- and inter-assay, respectively). Therefore, both the commercial C ELISA kit and the commercial T ELISA kit tested can be used to reliably measure C and T concentrations in the serum of Aceh cattle.

A significant increase in C secretion after transportation was detected by the commercial C ELISA kit tested. This result was predicted because C is the main modulator of physiological stress and it usually increases in response to a stressor³⁰. The commercial T ELISA kit also appeared reliable in its ability to discriminate T concentrations between bulls and cows. Testosterone concentrations in bulls were more than five times higher compared to cows. This result was expected because T is the major androgen produced by the Leydig cells of the testes³¹, whereas only small amounts are secreted in the adrenal cortex and ovaries of females³.

Our results indicated that the biological validation of commercial C and T ELISA kits can be performed using C measurements in relation to a stressful event and T measurements of different sexes. It is crucial to conduct such as validation to ensure the biological meaningfulness of the analyses^32,33. A commercial C ELISA kit (DRG, Cat. No. EIA-1887) and a commercial T ELISA kit (DRG, Cat. No. EIA-1559) are commercial ELISA kits developed for measuring hormone concentrations, particularly in human serum/plasma. These assays use an antibody highly specific to either C or T. The antigen (C or T) in the serum of Aceh cattle can bind correctly with the antibody (anti-cortisol and anti-testosterone) in these ELISA kits⁵. This is because the side-chains of the carbon compounds of C (C-21)³⁴ and T(C-19)³ have similar structures in vertebrates and the basic structure of steroid hormones is derived from the cyclopentanoperhydrophenanthrene structure. The validation of commercial ELISA kits for measuring hormones in animals has been successfully conducted in several species, such as progesterone in serum of cattle using human progesterone ELISA kit (Clinpro International Co. LLC, Union City, CA 94587, USA)³⁵, estradiol-17-beta and inhibin A in plasma of buffalo using human ELISA kit (For estradiol: Cat No. EIA-2693, DRG Instruments GmbH, Marburg, Germany; For Inhibin A: Inhibin A DSL-10-28100, Diagnostic System Laboratories Inc, Webster, Texas, USA)³⁶, C in plasma of horses using Immunotech kit³⁷, and T in serum of Kacang goats using T ELISA kit (Cat No. EIA-1559, DRG Instruments GmbH, Marburg, Germany) developed for human⁵.

In addition to the validation of ELISA kits, the effects of repeated freeze-thaw cycles on the stability of C and T concentrations in serum were tested. Concentrations of C decreased significantly after the exposure to four, six, and eight freeze-thaw cycles, while T concentrations did not. Concentrations of C declined up to 33.94% after eight freeze-thaw cycles, whereas the percentage changes in T concentrations were less than 10% in all test groups. These findings show that T is more resilient to freeze-thaw cycles compared to C. The reason why C concentrations decreased after exposure to repeated freeze-thaw cycles and T concentrations did not, it is not entirely clear. For C, it is possible, however, that the serum left at high temperatures (27.6±0.7°C) during the six hours of the thawing process might facilitate the increased degradation of C¹⁶. Consequently, less antigen in the serum binds with the antibody of the assay³⁸. Thus, C concentrations in all test groups were lower than the control group.

From a practical point of view, our results suggest that commercial C (EIA-1887) and T (EIA-1559) ELISA kits can accurately measure C and T concentrations, respectively, in the serum of animals such as Aceh cattle. It can be advantageous to use these commercial assays over assays specifically designed for animals because of their relatively low price. On the other hand, repeated freeze-thaw cycles must be considered, especially for the C measurement. Therefore, conditions that may potentially cause repeated freeze-thaw cycles of samples designated for hormone analysis (e.g. frequent power outages) should be avoided. Some efforts can be performed to prevent the possibility of repeated freeze-thaw cycles¹⁶. First, installing a backup generator to supply electricity when there are power outages. Second, filling each freezer with a blanket of ice packs to maintain the temperature inside the freezer during the power outage. Third, averting the use of an aliquot of serum/plasma for several analyses at different times. Fourth, dividing serum into several aliquots when several analyses are performed from the same sample.

This study has some limitations particularly information regarding the substantive reason for decreasing C concentrations after repeated freeze-thaw cycles which is still unclear. To elucidate this reason, the biochemistry of the serum after exposure to freeze thaw-cycles needs to be investigated in future studies. Moreover, it is unclear whether these assays are also reliable for other species, so they would need a validation test for each species. Apart from the fact that there are limitations, the results are important to support further studies in Aceh cattle, particularly for maintaining and growing the Aceh cattle population to ensure food security in the Aceh region and Indonesia as a whole.

In conclusion, our study shows that based on the analytical and biological validation tests, commercial C (EIA-1887) and T (EIA-1559) ELISA kits are reliable assays for measuring C and T, in serum of Aceh cattle. Moreover, biological validation showed that fluctuations of C and T in serum of Aceh cattle have a clear biological significance reflecting on the physiological condition of Aceh cattle. Results of the study also demonstrate that more than two repeated freeze-thaw cycles significantly affected the stability of serum C concentrations, but up to eight repeated freeze-thaw cycles did not significantly affect the stability of serum T concentrations.

Data availability

Underlying data

Figshare: Dataset 1. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.8342504.v2²⁷

This project contains the following underlying data:

- Analytical validation data.csv (raw values of analytical validation results included data of parallelism, accuracy, and precision [coefficients of variation/CV of intra-and inter-assay])

Figshare: Dataset 2 v2. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11678352²⁸

This project contains the following underlying data:

- Data of Biological validation.csv (raw values of biological validation results: cortisol concentrations before and after transportation and testosterone concentrations in bulls and cows of Aceh cattle)

Figshare: Dataset 3. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.8342720.v1²⁹

This project contains the following underlying data:

- Data of freeze-thaw cycles on cortisol and testosterone.csv (raw value of cortisol and testosterone concentration in Aceh cattle serum after exposure repeated freeze-thaw cycles)

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).

Extended data

Figshare: Extended data 1. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.8487830.v1²⁵

This project contains the following extended data:

- Ethical Clearance Approval Gholib et al..pdf (certificate of ethical clearance approval for using animals)

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Julia A. Kunz for valuable comments, suggestions, and English corrections during preparing this manuscript.

Faculty Opinions recommended

References

1. Sheriff MJ, Dantzer B, Delehanty B, et al.: Measuring stress in wildlife: techniques for quantifying glucocorticoids. Oecologia. 2011; 166(4): 869–887. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
2. Hardy MP, Gao HB, Dong Q, et al.: Stress hormone and male reproductive function. Cell Tissue Res. 2005; 322(1): 147–153. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
3. Chedrese PJ: Reproductive Endocrinology: A Moleculer approach. Springer Science + Madia Business, New York, USA. 2009. Publisher Full Text
4. Möstl E, Palme R: Hormones as indicators of stress. Dom Anim Endocrinol. 2002; 23(1–2): 67–74. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
5. Gholib G, Wahyuni S, Kadar OH, et al.: Measurement of serum testosterone in kacang goat by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (elisa) technique: the importance of kit validation. J Ked Hewan. 2016; 10(1): 32–36. Publisher Full Text
6. Du Z, Keeley T, Janssen T, et al.: Measurement of testosterone and cortisol metabolites and luteinising hormone in captive southern hairy-nosed wombat (Lasiorhinus latifrons) urine. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2017; 250: 70–79. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
7. Nugraha TP, Heistermann M, Agil M, et al.: Validation of a field-friendly extraction and storage method to monitor fecal steroid metabolites in wild orangutans. Primates. 2017; 58(2): 285–294. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
8. Gholib G, Heistermann M, Agil M, et al.: Comparison of fecal preservation and extraction methods for steroid hormone metabolite analysis in wild crested macaques. Primates. 2018; 59(3): 281–292. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
9. Durdiaková J, Fábryová H, Koborová I, et al.: The effects of saliva collection, handling and storage on salivary testosterone measurement. Steroids. 2013; 78(14): 1325–1331. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
10. Bloomer RJ: Considerations in the Measurement of Testosterone in Saliva and Serum using ELISA Procedures. Br J Med Med Res. 2015; 5(1): 116–122. Publisher Full Text
11. Stradaioli G, Peric T, Montillo M, et al.: Hair cortisol and testosterone concentrations and semen production of Bos taurus bulls. Ital J Anim Sci. 2017; 16(4): 631–639. Publisher Full Text
12. Dorgan JF, Fears TR, McMahon RP, et al.: Measurement of steroid sex hormones in serum: a comparison of radioimmunoassay and mass spectrometry. Steroids. 2002; 67(3–4): 151–158. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
13. Sakamoto S, Putalun W, Vimolmangkang S, et al.: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the quantitative/qualitative analysis of plant secondary metabolites. J Nat Med. 2018; 72(1): 32–42. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
14. Kinn Rød AM, Harkestad N, Jellestad FK, et al.: Comparison of commercial ELISA assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1): 6748. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
15. Rangel-Negrin A, Flores-Escobar E, Chavira R, et al.: Physiological and analytical validations of fecal steroid hormone measures in black howler monkeys. Primates. 2014; 55(4): 456–65. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
16. Gholib G, Agil M, Supriatna I, et al.: Repeated freeze-thaw cycles but not short-term storage of fecal extracts at ambient temperature influence the stability of steroid metabolite levels in crested macaques. J Ked Hewan. 2017; 11(2): 78–85. Publisher Full Text
17. Hodges JK, Heistermann M: Field Endocrinology: Monitoring Hormonal Changes in Free-Ranging Primates. In: Setchell JM, Curtis DJ (eds) Field and Laboratory Methods in Primatology: A Practical Guide. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 2011; 353–370. Publisher Full Text
18. Bielohuby M, Popp S, Bidlingmaier M: A guide for measurement of circulating metabolic hormones in rodents: Pitfalls during the pre-analytical phase. Mol Metab. 2012; 1(1–2): 47–60. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
19. Hillebrand JJ, Heijboer AC, Endert E: Effects of repeated freeze-thaw cycles on endocrine parameters in plasma and serum. Ann Clin Biochem. 2017; 54(2): 289–292. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
20. Reyna R, Traynor KD, Hines G, et al.: Repeated freezing and thawing does not generally alter assay results for several commonly studied reproductive hormones. Fertil Steril. 2001; 76(4): 823–825. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
21. Comstock GW, Burke AE, Norkus EP, et al.: Effects of Repeated Freeze-Thaw Cycles on Concentrations of Cholesterol, Micronutrients, and Hormones in Human Plasma and Serum. Clin Chem. 2001; 47(1): 139–142. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
22. Tahir MZ, Thoumire S, Raffaelli M, et al.: Effect of blood handling conditions on progesterone assay results obtained by chemiluminescence in the bitch. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2013; 45(3): 141–144. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
23. Kley HK, Rick W: The effect of storage and temperature on the analysis of steroids in plasma and blood. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1984; 22(5): 371–378. PubMed Abstract
24. Bauman JE: Stability of radioimmunoassayable steroid and protein hormones after repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Clin Chem. 1982; 28(11): 2336–2337. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
25. Gholib G, Wahyuni S, Akmal M, et al.: Extended data 1. figshare. Figure. 2019. http://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.8487830.v1
26. Zar JH: Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J. 1996.
27. Gholib G, Wahyuni S, Akmal M, et al.: Dataset 1. figshare. Dataset. 2019. http://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.8342504.v2
28. Gholib G, Wahyuni S, Akmal M, et al.: Dataset 2 v2. figshare. Dataset. 2020. http://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11678352
29. Gholib G, Wahyuni S, Akmal M, et al.: Dataset 3. figshare. Dataset. 2019. http://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.8342720.v1
30. Sapolsky RM, Romero LM, Munck AU: How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions. Endocr Rev. 2000; 21(1): 55–89. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
31. Swerdloff RS, Wang C, Sinha-Hikim AP: Hypothalamic–pituitary-gonadal axis in men. In: Pfaff DW, Arnold AP, Etgen AM, Fahrbach SE, Rubin RT (eds) Hormones, brain, and behavior. 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego. 2009; Part V: 2357–2395. Publisher Full Text
32. Hodges K, Brown J, Heistermann M: Endocrine monitoring of reproduction and stress. In: Kleiman DG, Thompson KV, Kirk Baer C (eds) Wild mammals in captivity: principles and techniques for zoo management. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 2010; 447–468. Reference Source
33. Heistermann M, Palme R, Ganswindt A: Comparison of different enzyme-immunoassays for assessment of adrenocortical activity in primates based on fecal analysis. Am J Primatol. 2006; 68(3): 257–273. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
34. Möstl E, Messmann S, Bagu E, et al.: Measurement of glucocorticoid metabolite concentrations in faeces of domestic livestock. Zentralbl Veterinarmed A. 1999; 46(10): 621–631. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
35. Bayemi PH, Nsongka VM, Perera BMAO, et al.: Validation of a human progesterone enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kit for use on serum of cattle in Cameroon. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2007; 39(5): 335–338. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
36. Todini S, Terzano GM, Malfatti A: Validation of ELISA kits for determination of Inhibin-A and Estradiol-17-beta concentrations in Buffalo plasma. Ital J Anim Sci. 2007; 6(sup2): 585–588. Publisher Full Text
37. Pawluski J, Jego P, Henry S, et al.: Low plasma cortisol and fecal cortisol metabolite measures as indicators of compromised welfare in domestic horses (Equus caballus). PLoS One. 2017; 12(9): e0182257. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
38. Pappano DJ, Roberts EK, Beehner JC: Testing extraction and storage parameters for a fecal hormone method. Am J Primatol. 2010; 72(11): 934–941. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 3

VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 30 Jul 2019

Author details Author details

Sri Wahyuni
Roles: Conceptualization, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing

Muslim Akmal
Roles: Data Curation, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing

Muhammad Hasan
Roles: Data Curation, Resources

Muhammad Agil
Roles: Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing

Bambang Purwantara
Roles: Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing

Competing interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information

This study was funded by The Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education, Indonesia [215/SP2H/LT/DPRM/2019]. This paper also supported by USAID through Sustainable Higher Education Research Alliances (SHERA) Program - Center for Collaborative Research Animal Biotechnology and Coral Reef Fisheries (CCR ANBIOCORE).
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Article Versions (3)

version 3

Revised

Published: 06 Mar 2020, 8:1220

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.19804.3

version 2

Revised

Published: 04 Feb 2020, 8:1220

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.19804.2

version 1

Published: 30 Jul 2019, 8:1220

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.19804.1

© 2020 Gholib G et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Download

Export To

metrics

	Views	Downloads
F1000Research	-	-
PubMed Central Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.	-	-

Citations

SEE MORE DETAILS

CITE

how to cite this article

Gholib G, Wahyuni S, Akmal M et al. The validation of a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and the effect of freeze-thaw cycles of serum on the stability of cortisol and testosterone concentrations in Aceh cattle [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2020, 8:1220 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.19804.3)

NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

track

receive updates on this article

Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Version 2

VERSION 2

PUBLISHED 04 Feb 2020

Revised

Views

Reviewer Report 27 Feb 2020

Annaïs Carbajal, Department of Animal Health and Anatomy, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.24459.r59513

The authors have adequately addressed all the issues suggested by the reviewers and therefore the manuscript has greatly improved.
There are a few minor changes that you will find in the document attached here.
I also suggest that ... Continue reading

CITE

Report a concern

Author Response 06 Mar 2020

Gholib Gholib, Physiology Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, 23111, Indonesia

06 Mar 2020

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 1 and 2.
First, we would like to thanks to reviewer 1 and 2 for their review and approved our paper (version 2). Minor comments and suggestions from ... Continue reading Response to Reviewer 1 and 2.
First, we would like to thanks to reviewer 1 and 2 for their review and approved our paper (version 2). Minor comments and suggestions from reviewer 2 have helped us to further improve this paper. We have changed the paper according to all points raised. Each objective has been added with the hypothesis. Explanations of sample one and sample two used for parallelism test were added. Some grammatical errors and typing errors have been improved.
Response to Reviewer 1 and 2.
First, we would like to thanks to reviewer 1 and 2 for their review and approved our paper (version 2). Minor comments and suggestions from reviewer 2 have helped us to further improve this paper. We have changed the paper according to all points raised. Each objective has been added with the hypothesis. Explanations of sample one and sample two used for parallelism test were added. Some grammatical errors and typing errors have been improved.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed Close
Report a concern
Respond or Comment

COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT

Author Response 06 Mar 2020

Gholib Gholib, Physiology Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, 23111, Indonesia

06 Mar 2020

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 1 and 2.
First, we would like to thanks to reviewer 1 and 2 for their review and approved our paper (version 2). Minor comments and suggestions from ... Continue reading Response to Reviewer 1 and 2.
First, we would like to thanks to reviewer 1 and 2 for their review and approved our paper (version 2). Minor comments and suggestions from reviewer 2 have helped us to further improve this paper. We have changed the paper according to all points raised. Each objective has been added with the hypothesis. Explanations of sample one and sample two used for parallelism test were added. Some grammatical errors and typing errors have been improved.
Response to Reviewer 1 and 2.
First, we would like to thanks to reviewer 1 and 2 for their review and approved our paper (version 2). Minor comments and suggestions from reviewer 2 have helped us to further improve this paper. We have changed the paper according to all points raised. Each objective has been added with the hypothesis. Explanations of sample one and sample two used for parallelism test were added. Some grammatical errors and typing errors have been improved.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed Close
Report a concern

Views

Reviewer Report 05 Feb 2020

Pudji Astuti, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Gadjah Mada University (UGM), Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.24459.r59514

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an ... Continue reading

CITE

Report a concern

Author Response 06 Mar 2020

Gholib Gholib, Physiology Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, 23111, Indonesia

06 Mar 2020

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 1 and 2.
First, we would like to thanks to reviewer 1 and 2 for their review and approved our paper (version 2). Minor comments and suggestions from ... Continue reading Response to Reviewer 1 and 2.
First, we would like to thanks to reviewer 1 and 2 for their review and approved our paper (version 2). Minor comments and suggestions from reviewer 2 have helped us to further improve this paper. We have changed the paper according to all points raised. Each objective has been added with the hypothesis. Explanations of sample one and sample two used for parallelism test were added. Some grammatical errors and typing errors have been improved.
Response to Reviewer 1 and 2.
First, we would like to thanks to reviewer 1 and 2 for their review and approved our paper (version 2). Minor comments and suggestions from reviewer 2 have helped us to further improve this paper. We have changed the paper according to all points raised. Each objective has been added with the hypothesis. Explanations of sample one and sample two used for parallelism test were added. Some grammatical errors and typing errors have been improved.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed Close
Report a concern
Respond or Comment

COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT

Author Response 06 Mar 2020

Gholib Gholib, Physiology Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, 23111, Indonesia

06 Mar 2020

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 1 and 2.
First, we would like to thanks to reviewer 1 and 2 for their review and approved our paper (version 2). Minor comments and suggestions from ... Continue reading Response to Reviewer 1 and 2.
First, we would like to thanks to reviewer 1 and 2 for their review and approved our paper (version 2). Minor comments and suggestions from reviewer 2 have helped us to further improve this paper. We have changed the paper according to all points raised. Each objective has been added with the hypothesis. Explanations of sample one and sample two used for parallelism test were added. Some grammatical errors and typing errors have been improved.
Response to Reviewer 1 and 2.
First, we would like to thanks to reviewer 1 and 2 for their review and approved our paper (version 2). Minor comments and suggestions from reviewer 2 have helped us to further improve this paper. We have changed the paper according to all points raised. Each objective has been added with the hypothesis. Explanations of sample one and sample two used for parallelism test were added. Some grammatical errors and typing errors have been improved.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed Close
Report a concern

Version 1

VERSION 1

PUBLISHED 30 Jul 2019

Views

Reviewer Report 16 Oct 2019

Annaïs Carbajal, Department of Animal Health and Anatomy, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Approved with Reservations

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.21725.r54435

The authors validated an EIA for testosterone and cortisol detection in serum of Aceh cattle. They also performed the biological validation of both hormones in serum. And finally, they evaluated the effect of freeze-thaw cycles on the stability of these hormones in serum.

Although the technique they present is not new, the validation the authors perform are imperative for the proper hormone interpretation in every matrix, and thus this should be done for each species, matrix and assay of interest. The study has a robust experimental design despite using a low number of samples in some experiments. Results they present are very useful and may provide guidance for future studies to perform appropriate validations of their methods.

My major concern is why the authors discuss that T is affected by the freeze-thaw cycles if results do not indicate the same. Additionally, I would suggest dividing the aims in three: analytical validation, biological validation and freeze-thaw cycles, as they may provide three different results and conclusions. I have also added some minor comments which can be found in the pdf document that I hope they will be useful for the authors.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Endocrinology and animal stress

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

CITE

Report a concern

Author Response 04 Feb 2020

Gholib Gholib, Physiology Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, 23111, Indonesia

04 Feb 2020

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 2.
First, we would like to thanks to the reviewer 2 for reviewing our paper and gave approved with reservations . Her comments and suggestions have helped us ... Continue reading Response to Reviewer 2.
First, we would like to thanks to the reviewer 2 for reviewing our paper and gave approved with reservations . Her comments and suggestions have helped us to further improve the paper. As you will see in the response-to-reviewer below, we have answered all points raised and have changed the paper accordingly. We very much hope that the paper is now finally approved.

1. New sentence should not start with an abbreviation. This needs to be rectified in the whole text
Response: All abbreviation in new sentences have been changed throughout text.

2. T is also produced by the ovaries and the adrenals
Response: Yes, you are right, T is also produced by the ovaries and the adrenals. An explanation has been added in revised paper

3. Could also be due to species-specific differences?Response: Yes, it can be influence by species-specific differences, Thank you very much for the revision. It has been added to the revised paper.

4. The aims of the study are not fully clear here. As three different results are discused, I would recommend dividing the aims in 3 clear objectives: Analytical validation, biological validation and freeze-thaw cycles
Response: Thank you very much for your suggestion. Now, The aims were dividedinto three objectives. The objective of the present study were: First, conducting an analytical validation test to examine the reliability of commercial C (Cat. no. EIA-1887) and T (Cat. no. EIA-1559) ELISA kits that accurately measure C and T concentrations, respectively in Aceh cattle; Second, performing a biological validation test to examine the reliability of commercial C ELISA kit (Cat. no. EIA-1887) to the response a stress event by comparing C concentrations before and after transportation and the reliability of T ELISA kit (Cat. no. EIA-1559) ELISA kits in discriminating the T concentrations from different sexes (bulls versus cows). The hypothesis is that C concentrations should be higher following transportation and the T concentration should be higher in bulls. Finally, the stability of C and T concentrations in the serum of Aceh cattle after exposure to several repeated freeze-thaw cycles was evaluated. For details, please see in the revised paper.

5. This is not totally true since only 5 individuals are used for the C validation.
Response: Thank you for your correction. Thank you for your correction. We have collected additional samples ( 10 bulls and 10 cows) to increase the number of samples. Now, in total 32 Aceh cattle were used: 16 bulls and 16 cows. For the testosterone validation test, all cattle ( 16 bulls and 16 cows) were used. For cortisol validation test, 16 cattle ( 8 bulls and 8 cows ) were used which is taken from 32 Aceh cattle above. The explanation has been added in the revised paper.

6. Information is lacking here. For example, why did you collect samples at 16h and 6h? This information should go to the subsection "biological validation" - experimental design.
Response: For biological validation of C, Samples were collected at 16 h, four hours after the trip to monitor the increase in Cortisol after the transportation. For biological validation of T, Samples were collected in the morning (6h-8h) because in some speceies including cattle, there is diurnal variation of T in blood which concentration of T ishigher in the morning compared to afternoon. This explanation has been added to the subsection of biological validation.

7. Hypothesis are written in the introduction
Response: Hypothesis has been deleted in this section and moved to the subsection “ introduction”.

8. Why serum was collected a day before and not immediately before transport? Please, specify the time of day when samples were collected.Response: Sample was collected a day before to prevent the stress in cattle and sometimes blood collection in cattle needs some times. More explanation has been added in the revised paper

9.This is mean and standard deviation? Please, specify
Response: Thank you very much for your correction, it has been added in the revise paper.

10. Ref 24 extended data 1 shows: Certificate of ethical clearance approval for using animals for study on monitoring reproduction and stress in aceh cattleData on the test of equality is not provided. Here the reference should be ref 26.
Indicate the name of the statistical model used to "test of equality of two slopes"
Response: Model used for the test of equality of two slopes is Logarithmic regression. Thank you for your correction, the reference No. was also changed.

11. More information is needed to interpret the data.Parallelism: indicate which test was made in order to obtain results of t and p
Dose response curve: is this a different test or they are results from the parallelism test? Do the equations provide extra information with regard to the parallelism test results (t and p)?
Response: Thank you for your suggestion. For the parallelism, a test of equality of two slopes was used to compare between standard slope (C and T) and slope of sample one and sample two obtained from the regression equations. From the equations {dose respone curve) containing value of slope for standard , sample one and two. Based on the results, we compared the standard slope (C and T) with the slope of sample one and sample to see whether they are parallel to standard slope based on the the pvalueand t value. Since the pValue >0.05, it is indicated that these slopes are similar/parallelwith the standard slope (not significant different). More explanation has been added in the revised paper

12. Table 2 and Figure 3 provide the same information. If percentages were used to perform statistics, I suggest removing Table 2.
Response: Thank you for your suggestion, the Table 2 has been deleted fronm the revised paper

13. Reviewer 2: used to reliably measure C and T concentrations in serum of Aceh cattleResponse: Thank you, the specific assay used in each study has been added in the revised paper.

14. Reviewer 2: Please specify the matrix you are talking about
Response: Thank you, the specific assay used in each study has been added in the revised paper.
"The validation of commercial ELISA kits for measuring hormones in animals has been successfully conducted in several animals, such as progesterone in cattle using human progesterone ELISA kit (Clinpro International Co. LLC, Union City, CA 94587, USA) , estradiol-17-beta and inhibin A in buffalo using human ELISA kit (For estradiol: Cat No. EIA-2693, DRG Instruments GmbH, Marburg, Germany; For Inhibin A: Inhibin A DSL-10-28100, Diagnostic System Laboratories Inc, Webster, Texas, US), C in horses using Immunotech kit , and T in Kacang goats using T ELISA kit (Cat No. EIA-1559, DRG Instruments GmbH, Marburg, Germany) developed for human."

15. Your results suggest the opposite regarding the T levels Your results suggest the opposite regarding the T levels
Response: Thank you for your correction, Although, T wes decresed less 10%, but this is not significant. You are right, T is not significantly affected by freeze thaw cycles. The explanation has been improved.

16. Consider shortening the sentence or dividing the information in 2-3 shorter sentences. This way, it will be easier for the reader to understand.
Response: Thank you very much for your suggestion. The sentence has been divided into 4 shorter sentences.

17. Reviewer 2: Same as before. If the T concentrations remained stable, why do you say that T concentrations decreased?Response: Thank you, it has been corrected in the revised paper.

18. Reviewer 2: An important conclusion is lacking: The biological validation suggests that fluctuations of C and T in serum of Aceh cattle have a clear biological significance.
Response: Thank you for your suggestion. An additional conclusion has been added in the revised paper.
"In conclusion, our study shows that based on the analytical and biological validation tests, commercial C (EIA-1887) and T (EIA-1559) ELISA kits are reliable assays for measuring C and T, in serum of Aceh cattle. Moreover, biological validation showed that fluctuations of C and T in serum of Aceh cattle have a clear biological significance reflecting to the physiological condition of Aceh cattle. Results of the study also demonstrate that more than two repeated freeze-thaw cycles significantly affected the stability of serum C concentrations, but up to eight repeated freeze-thaw cycles did not significantly affect the stability of serum T concentrations."
Response to Reviewer 2.
First, we would like to thanks to the reviewer 2 for reviewing our paper and gave approved with reservations . Her comments and suggestions have helped us to further improve the paper. As you will see in the response-to-reviewer below, we have answered all points raised and have changed the paper accordingly. We very much hope that the paper is now finally approved.

1. New sentence should not start with an abbreviation. This needs to be rectified in the whole text
Response: All abbreviation in new sentences have been changed throughout text.

2. T is also produced by the ovaries and the adrenals
Response: Yes, you are right, T is also produced by the ovaries and the adrenals. An explanation has been added in revised paper

3. Could also be due to species-specific differences?Response: Yes, it can be influence by species-specific differences, Thank you very much for the revision. It has been added to the revised paper.

4. The aims of the study are not fully clear here. As three different results are discused, I would recommend dividing the aims in 3 clear objectives: Analytical validation, biological validation and freeze-thaw cycles
Response: Thank you very much for your suggestion. Now, The aims were dividedinto three objectives. The objective of the present study were: First, conducting an analytical validation test to examine the reliability of commercial C (Cat. no. EIA-1887) and T (Cat. no. EIA-1559) ELISA kits that accurately measure C and T concentrations, respectively in Aceh cattle; Second, performing a biological validation test to examine the reliability of commercial C ELISA kit (Cat. no. EIA-1887) to the response a stress event by comparing C concentrations before and after transportation and the reliability of T ELISA kit (Cat. no. EIA-1559) ELISA kits in discriminating the T concentrations from different sexes (bulls versus cows). The hypothesis is that C concentrations should be higher following transportation and the T concentration should be higher in bulls. Finally, the stability of C and T concentrations in the serum of Aceh cattle after exposure to several repeated freeze-thaw cycles was evaluated. For details, please see in the revised paper.

5. This is not totally true since only 5 individuals are used for the C validation.
Response: Thank you for your correction. Thank you for your correction. We have collected additional samples ( 10 bulls and 10 cows) to increase the number of samples. Now, in total 32 Aceh cattle were used: 16 bulls and 16 cows. For the testosterone validation test, all cattle ( 16 bulls and 16 cows) were used. For cortisol validation test, 16 cattle ( 8 bulls and 8 cows ) were used which is taken from 32 Aceh cattle above. The explanation has been added in the revised paper.

6. Information is lacking here. For example, why did you collect samples at 16h and 6h? This information should go to the subsection "biological validation" - experimental design.
Response: For biological validation of C, Samples were collected at 16 h, four hours after the trip to monitor the increase in Cortisol after the transportation. For biological validation of T, Samples were collected in the morning (6h-8h) because in some speceies including cattle, there is diurnal variation of T in blood which concentration of T ishigher in the morning compared to afternoon. This explanation has been added to the subsection of biological validation.

7. Hypothesis are written in the introduction
Response: Hypothesis has been deleted in this section and moved to the subsection “ introduction”.

8. Why serum was collected a day before and not immediately before transport? Please, specify the time of day when samples were collected.Response: Sample was collected a day before to prevent the stress in cattle and sometimes blood collection in cattle needs some times. More explanation has been added in the revised paper

9.This is mean and standard deviation? Please, specify
Response: Thank you very much for your correction, it has been added in the revise paper.

10. Ref 24 extended data 1 shows: Certificate of ethical clearance approval for using animals for study on monitoring reproduction and stress in aceh cattleData on the test of equality is not provided. Here the reference should be ref 26.
Indicate the name of the statistical model used to "test of equality of two slopes"
Response: Model used for the test of equality of two slopes is Logarithmic regression. Thank you for your correction, the reference No. was also changed.

11. More information is needed to interpret the data.Parallelism: indicate which test was made in order to obtain results of t and p
Dose response curve: is this a different test or they are results from the parallelism test? Do the equations provide extra information with regard to the parallelism test results (t and p)?
Response: Thank you for your suggestion. For the parallelism, a test of equality of two slopes was used to compare between standard slope (C and T) and slope of sample one and sample two obtained from the regression equations. From the equations {dose respone curve) containing value of slope for standard , sample one and two. Based on the results, we compared the standard slope (C and T) with the slope of sample one and sample to see whether they are parallel to standard slope based on the the pvalueand t value. Since the pValue >0.05, it is indicated that these slopes are similar/parallelwith the standard slope (not significant different). More explanation has been added in the revised paper

12. Table 2 and Figure 3 provide the same information. If percentages were used to perform statistics, I suggest removing Table 2.
Response: Thank you for your suggestion, the Table 2 has been deleted fronm the revised paper

13. Reviewer 2: used to reliably measure C and T concentrations in serum of Aceh cattleResponse: Thank you, the specific assay used in each study has been added in the revised paper.

14. Reviewer 2: Please specify the matrix you are talking about
Response: Thank you, the specific assay used in each study has been added in the revised paper.
"The validation of commercial ELISA kits for measuring hormones in animals has been successfully conducted in several animals, such as progesterone in cattle using human progesterone ELISA kit (Clinpro International Co. LLC, Union City, CA 94587, USA) , estradiol-17-beta and inhibin A in buffalo using human ELISA kit (For estradiol: Cat No. EIA-2693, DRG Instruments GmbH, Marburg, Germany; For Inhibin A: Inhibin A DSL-10-28100, Diagnostic System Laboratories Inc, Webster, Texas, US), C in horses using Immunotech kit , and T in Kacang goats using T ELISA kit (Cat No. EIA-1559, DRG Instruments GmbH, Marburg, Germany) developed for human."

15. Your results suggest the opposite regarding the T levels Your results suggest the opposite regarding the T levels
Response: Thank you for your correction, Although, T wes decresed less 10%, but this is not significant. You are right, T is not significantly affected by freeze thaw cycles. The explanation has been improved.

16. Consider shortening the sentence or dividing the information in 2-3 shorter sentences. This way, it will be easier for the reader to understand.
Response: Thank you very much for your suggestion. The sentence has been divided into 4 shorter sentences.

17. Reviewer 2: Same as before. If the T concentrations remained stable, why do you say that T concentrations decreased?Response: Thank you, it has been corrected in the revised paper.

18. Reviewer 2: An important conclusion is lacking: The biological validation suggests that fluctuations of C and T in serum of Aceh cattle have a clear biological significance.
Response: Thank you for your suggestion. An additional conclusion has been added in the revised paper.
"In conclusion, our study shows that based on the analytical and biological validation tests, commercial C (EIA-1887) and T (EIA-1559) ELISA kits are reliable assays for measuring C and T, in serum of Aceh cattle. Moreover, biological validation showed that fluctuations of C and T in serum of Aceh cattle have a clear biological significance reflecting to the physiological condition of Aceh cattle. Results of the study also demonstrate that more than two repeated freeze-thaw cycles significantly affected the stability of serum C concentrations, but up to eight repeated freeze-thaw cycles did not significantly affect the stability of serum T concentrations."
Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests Close
Report a concern
Respond or Comment

COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT

Author Response 04 Feb 2020

Gholib Gholib, Physiology Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, 23111, Indonesia

04 Feb 2020

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 2.
First, we would like to thanks to the reviewer 2 for reviewing our paper and gave approved with reservations . Her comments and suggestions have helped us ... Continue reading Response to Reviewer 2.
First, we would like to thanks to the reviewer 2 for reviewing our paper and gave approved with reservations . Her comments and suggestions have helped us to further improve the paper. As you will see in the response-to-reviewer below, we have answered all points raised and have changed the paper accordingly. We very much hope that the paper is now finally approved.

1. New sentence should not start with an abbreviation. This needs to be rectified in the whole text
Response: All abbreviation in new sentences have been changed throughout text.

2. T is also produced by the ovaries and the adrenals
Response: Yes, you are right, T is also produced by the ovaries and the adrenals. An explanation has been added in revised paper

3. Could also be due to species-specific differences?Response: Yes, it can be influence by species-specific differences, Thank you very much for the revision. It has been added to the revised paper.

4. The aims of the study are not fully clear here. As three different results are discused, I would recommend dividing the aims in 3 clear objectives: Analytical validation, biological validation and freeze-thaw cycles
Response: Thank you very much for your suggestion. Now, The aims were dividedinto three objectives. The objective of the present study were: First, conducting an analytical validation test to examine the reliability of commercial C (Cat. no. EIA-1887) and T (Cat. no. EIA-1559) ELISA kits that accurately measure C and T concentrations, respectively in Aceh cattle; Second, performing a biological validation test to examine the reliability of commercial C ELISA kit (Cat. no. EIA-1887) to the response a stress event by comparing C concentrations before and after transportation and the reliability of T ELISA kit (Cat. no. EIA-1559) ELISA kits in discriminating the T concentrations from different sexes (bulls versus cows). The hypothesis is that C concentrations should be higher following transportation and the T concentration should be higher in bulls. Finally, the stability of C and T concentrations in the serum of Aceh cattle after exposure to several repeated freeze-thaw cycles was evaluated. For details, please see in the revised paper.

5. This is not totally true since only 5 individuals are used for the C validation.
Response: Thank you for your correction. Thank you for your correction. We have collected additional samples ( 10 bulls and 10 cows) to increase the number of samples. Now, in total 32 Aceh cattle were used: 16 bulls and 16 cows. For the testosterone validation test, all cattle ( 16 bulls and 16 cows) were used. For cortisol validation test, 16 cattle ( 8 bulls and 8 cows ) were used which is taken from 32 Aceh cattle above. The explanation has been added in the revised paper.

6. Information is lacking here. For example, why did you collect samples at 16h and 6h? This information should go to the subsection "biological validation" - experimental design.
Response: For biological validation of C, Samples were collected at 16 h, four hours after the trip to monitor the increase in Cortisol after the transportation. For biological validation of T, Samples were collected in the morning (6h-8h) because in some speceies including cattle, there is diurnal variation of T in blood which concentration of T ishigher in the morning compared to afternoon. This explanation has been added to the subsection of biological validation.

7. Hypothesis are written in the introduction
Response: Hypothesis has been deleted in this section and moved to the subsection “ introduction”.

8. Why serum was collected a day before and not immediately before transport? Please, specify the time of day when samples were collected.Response: Sample was collected a day before to prevent the stress in cattle and sometimes blood collection in cattle needs some times. More explanation has been added in the revised paper

9.This is mean and standard deviation? Please, specify
Response: Thank you very much for your correction, it has been added in the revise paper.

10. Ref 24 extended data 1 shows: Certificate of ethical clearance approval for using animals for study on monitoring reproduction and stress in aceh cattleData on the test of equality is not provided. Here the reference should be ref 26.
Indicate the name of the statistical model used to "test of equality of two slopes"
Response: Model used for the test of equality of two slopes is Logarithmic regression. Thank you for your correction, the reference No. was also changed.

11. More information is needed to interpret the data.Parallelism: indicate which test was made in order to obtain results of t and p
Dose response curve: is this a different test or they are results from the parallelism test? Do the equations provide extra information with regard to the parallelism test results (t and p)?
Response: Thank you for your suggestion. For the parallelism, a test of equality of two slopes was used to compare between standard slope (C and T) and slope of sample one and sample two obtained from the regression equations. From the equations {dose respone curve) containing value of slope for standard , sample one and two. Based on the results, we compared the standard slope (C and T) with the slope of sample one and sample to see whether they are parallel to standard slope based on the the pvalueand t value. Since the pValue >0.05, it is indicated that these slopes are similar/parallelwith the standard slope (not significant different). More explanation has been added in the revised paper

12. Table 2 and Figure 3 provide the same information. If percentages were used to perform statistics, I suggest removing Table 2.
Response: Thank you for your suggestion, the Table 2 has been deleted fronm the revised paper

13. Reviewer 2: used to reliably measure C and T concentrations in serum of Aceh cattleResponse: Thank you, the specific assay used in each study has been added in the revised paper.

14. Reviewer 2: Please specify the matrix you are talking about
Response: Thank you, the specific assay used in each study has been added in the revised paper.
"The validation of commercial ELISA kits for measuring hormones in animals has been successfully conducted in several animals, such as progesterone in cattle using human progesterone ELISA kit (Clinpro International Co. LLC, Union City, CA 94587, USA) , estradiol-17-beta and inhibin A in buffalo using human ELISA kit (For estradiol: Cat No. EIA-2693, DRG Instruments GmbH, Marburg, Germany; For Inhibin A: Inhibin A DSL-10-28100, Diagnostic System Laboratories Inc, Webster, Texas, US), C in horses using Immunotech kit , and T in Kacang goats using T ELISA kit (Cat No. EIA-1559, DRG Instruments GmbH, Marburg, Germany) developed for human."

15. Your results suggest the opposite regarding the T levels Your results suggest the opposite regarding the T levels
Response: Thank you for your correction, Although, T wes decresed less 10%, but this is not significant. You are right, T is not significantly affected by freeze thaw cycles. The explanation has been improved.

16. Consider shortening the sentence or dividing the information in 2-3 shorter sentences. This way, it will be easier for the reader to understand.
Response: Thank you very much for your suggestion. The sentence has been divided into 4 shorter sentences.

17. Reviewer 2: Same as before. If the T concentrations remained stable, why do you say that T concentrations decreased?Response: Thank you, it has been corrected in the revised paper.

18. Reviewer 2: An important conclusion is lacking: The biological validation suggests that fluctuations of C and T in serum of Aceh cattle have a clear biological significance.
Response: Thank you for your suggestion. An additional conclusion has been added in the revised paper.
"In conclusion, our study shows that based on the analytical and biological validation tests, commercial C (EIA-1887) and T (EIA-1559) ELISA kits are reliable assays for measuring C and T, in serum of Aceh cattle. Moreover, biological validation showed that fluctuations of C and T in serum of Aceh cattle have a clear biological significance reflecting to the physiological condition of Aceh cattle. Results of the study also demonstrate that more than two repeated freeze-thaw cycles significantly affected the stability of serum C concentrations, but up to eight repeated freeze-thaw cycles did not significantly affect the stability of serum T concentrations."
Response to Reviewer 2.
First, we would like to thanks to the reviewer 2 for reviewing our paper and gave approved with reservations . Her comments and suggestions have helped us to further improve the paper. As you will see in the response-to-reviewer below, we have answered all points raised and have changed the paper accordingly. We very much hope that the paper is now finally approved.

1. New sentence should not start with an abbreviation. This needs to be rectified in the whole text
Response: All abbreviation in new sentences have been changed throughout text.

2. T is also produced by the ovaries and the adrenals
Response: Yes, you are right, T is also produced by the ovaries and the adrenals. An explanation has been added in revised paper

3. Could also be due to species-specific differences?Response: Yes, it can be influence by species-specific differences, Thank you very much for the revision. It has been added to the revised paper.

4. The aims of the study are not fully clear here. As three different results are discused, I would recommend dividing the aims in 3 clear objectives: Analytical validation, biological validation and freeze-thaw cycles
Response: Thank you very much for your suggestion. Now, The aims were dividedinto three objectives. The objective of the present study were: First, conducting an analytical validation test to examine the reliability of commercial C (Cat. no. EIA-1887) and T (Cat. no. EIA-1559) ELISA kits that accurately measure C and T concentrations, respectively in Aceh cattle; Second, performing a biological validation test to examine the reliability of commercial C ELISA kit (Cat. no. EIA-1887) to the response a stress event by comparing C concentrations before and after transportation and the reliability of T ELISA kit (Cat. no. EIA-1559) ELISA kits in discriminating the T concentrations from different sexes (bulls versus cows). The hypothesis is that C concentrations should be higher following transportation and the T concentration should be higher in bulls. Finally, the stability of C and T concentrations in the serum of Aceh cattle after exposure to several repeated freeze-thaw cycles was evaluated. For details, please see in the revised paper.

5. This is not totally true since only 5 individuals are used for the C validation.
Response: Thank you for your correction. Thank you for your correction. We have collected additional samples ( 10 bulls and 10 cows) to increase the number of samples. Now, in total 32 Aceh cattle were used: 16 bulls and 16 cows. For the testosterone validation test, all cattle ( 16 bulls and 16 cows) were used. For cortisol validation test, 16 cattle ( 8 bulls and 8 cows ) were used which is taken from 32 Aceh cattle above. The explanation has been added in the revised paper.

6. Information is lacking here. For example, why did you collect samples at 16h and 6h? This information should go to the subsection "biological validation" - experimental design.
Response: For biological validation of C, Samples were collected at 16 h, four hours after the trip to monitor the increase in Cortisol after the transportation. For biological validation of T, Samples were collected in the morning (6h-8h) because in some speceies including cattle, there is diurnal variation of T in blood which concentration of T ishigher in the morning compared to afternoon. This explanation has been added to the subsection of biological validation.

7. Hypothesis are written in the introduction
Response: Hypothesis has been deleted in this section and moved to the subsection “ introduction”.

8. Why serum was collected a day before and not immediately before transport? Please, specify the time of day when samples were collected.Response: Sample was collected a day before to prevent the stress in cattle and sometimes blood collection in cattle needs some times. More explanation has been added in the revised paper

9.This is mean and standard deviation? Please, specify
Response: Thank you very much for your correction, it has been added in the revise paper.

10. Ref 24 extended data 1 shows: Certificate of ethical clearance approval for using animals for study on monitoring reproduction and stress in aceh cattleData on the test of equality is not provided. Here the reference should be ref 26.
Indicate the name of the statistical model used to "test of equality of two slopes"
Response: Model used for the test of equality of two slopes is Logarithmic regression. Thank you for your correction, the reference No. was also changed.

11. More information is needed to interpret the data.Parallelism: indicate which test was made in order to obtain results of t and p
Dose response curve: is this a different test or they are results from the parallelism test? Do the equations provide extra information with regard to the parallelism test results (t and p)?
Response: Thank you for your suggestion. For the parallelism, a test of equality of two slopes was used to compare between standard slope (C and T) and slope of sample one and sample two obtained from the regression equations. From the equations {dose respone curve) containing value of slope for standard , sample one and two. Based on the results, we compared the standard slope (C and T) with the slope of sample one and sample to see whether they are parallel to standard slope based on the the pvalueand t value. Since the pValue >0.05, it is indicated that these slopes are similar/parallelwith the standard slope (not significant different). More explanation has been added in the revised paper

12. Table 2 and Figure 3 provide the same information. If percentages were used to perform statistics, I suggest removing Table 2.
Response: Thank you for your suggestion, the Table 2 has been deleted fronm the revised paper

13. Reviewer 2: used to reliably measure C and T concentrations in serum of Aceh cattleResponse: Thank you, the specific assay used in each study has been added in the revised paper.

14. Reviewer 2: Please specify the matrix you are talking about
Response: Thank you, the specific assay used in each study has been added in the revised paper.
"The validation of commercial ELISA kits for measuring hormones in animals has been successfully conducted in several animals, such as progesterone in cattle using human progesterone ELISA kit (Clinpro International Co. LLC, Union City, CA 94587, USA) , estradiol-17-beta and inhibin A in buffalo using human ELISA kit (For estradiol: Cat No. EIA-2693, DRG Instruments GmbH, Marburg, Germany; For Inhibin A: Inhibin A DSL-10-28100, Diagnostic System Laboratories Inc, Webster, Texas, US), C in horses using Immunotech kit , and T in Kacang goats using T ELISA kit (Cat No. EIA-1559, DRG Instruments GmbH, Marburg, Germany) developed for human."

15. Your results suggest the opposite regarding the T levels Your results suggest the opposite regarding the T levels
Response: Thank you for your correction, Although, T wes decresed less 10%, but this is not significant. You are right, T is not significantly affected by freeze thaw cycles. The explanation has been improved.

16. Consider shortening the sentence or dividing the information in 2-3 shorter sentences. This way, it will be easier for the reader to understand.
Response: Thank you very much for your suggestion. The sentence has been divided into 4 shorter sentences.

17. Reviewer 2: Same as before. If the T concentrations remained stable, why do you say that T concentrations decreased?Response: Thank you, it has been corrected in the revised paper.

18. Reviewer 2: An important conclusion is lacking: The biological validation suggests that fluctuations of C and T in serum of Aceh cattle have a clear biological significance.
Response: Thank you for your suggestion. An additional conclusion has been added in the revised paper.
"In conclusion, our study shows that based on the analytical and biological validation tests, commercial C (EIA-1887) and T (EIA-1559) ELISA kits are reliable assays for measuring C and T, in serum of Aceh cattle. Moreover, biological validation showed that fluctuations of C and T in serum of Aceh cattle have a clear biological significance reflecting to the physiological condition of Aceh cattle. Results of the study also demonstrate that more than two repeated freeze-thaw cycles significantly affected the stability of serum C concentrations, but up to eight repeated freeze-thaw cycles did not significantly affect the stability of serum T concentrations."
Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests Close
Report a concern

Views

Reviewer Report 03 Sep 2019

Pudji Astuti, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Gadjah Mada University (UGM), Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.21725.r52712

The details comment of the paper are attached (Please see attachment).
Overall the content are complete including the validation test and the Biological validation are conducted.
The

The details comment of the paper are attached (Please see attachment).
Overall the content are complete including the validation test and the Biological validation are conducted.
The theory of similarity base chemical formula namely cyclopentano perhydro phenanthrene both of human and animal should be added.
The information standard of parallelism should be added.
Although the number of samples is less than specified (based on the Frederer formula), the results can still be accounted for because the amount of 12 samples is still very sufficient considering the large number of replications.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

CITE

Report a concern

Author Response 04 Feb 2020

Gholib Gholib, Physiology Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, 23111, Indonesia

04 Feb 2020

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 1.
First, we would like to thanks to the reviewer 1 for approved our paper. Her comments and suggestions have helped us to further improve the paper. As ... Continue reading Response to Reviewer 1.
First, we would like to thanks to the reviewer 1 for approved our paper. Her comments and suggestions have helped us to further improve the paper. As you will see in the response-to-reviewer below, we have answered all points raised and have changed the paper accordingly.

1. Do not use personal pronouns. Please don't use we, I etc
Response: It has been changed throughout the text.

2. Choose the most 5 important words
Response: In the guideline, it was mentioned that we can use until 8 keywords. We still keep the keywords because using more keywords will help people to find our paper.

3. Do not use abbreviation word on the beginning of the line
Response: It has been changed throughout the text.

4. Is there any correlation between C and T in this case?
Response:Yes there is a correlation between cortisol and testosterone in some animals from previous studies. From the previous study, high levels of cortisol can suppres the testosterone production.
An additional sentence and references have been added in the revised paper

5. Due to the same base form of steroid (cyclopentanoperhydrophenantrend), we can use the same kit for animal as in human.
Response: Thank you for your suggestion, This statement has been mentioned in the discussion section.

6. Do not use personal pronouns
Response: It has been changed throughout texts

7. Should be done by veterinarians
Response: During the study, our team was accompanied by a veterinarian during data collection.Blood samples were performed by veterinarians. This statement has been written in the paper ( ethical statement, collection and processing of blood samples)

8. How to validate the data, because the samples are less than it should be?
Response: We have added the number of samples. Now, 32 Aceh cattle were used: 16 bulls and 16 cows. For the testosterone validation test, all cattle ( 16 bulls and 16 cows) were used. For cortisol validation test, 16 cattle ( 8 bulls and 8 cows ) were used which is taken from 32 Aceh cattle above. The explanation has been added in the revised paper

9. Please add some information of the feed and the volume per head.
Response: Feed given to the cattle is grass at 10% of body weight and 1% of body weight of rice bran and tofu dregs. The explanation has been added in the revised paper

10. until the assay process are conducted
Response: Thank you for your suggestion, we have added some words in revised paper

11. Please add sign of significant on testosterone
Response: Superskrip “ a” has been added to the testosterone data in the Figure 3, because they showed not significant different. Table 2. has been deleted from the revised paper.

12. Due to the same base form, the kit also can be used in animals as in human. Please add this explanation
Response: The explanation has been added in the discussion section, paragraph 3^rd in revised paper

13. Please explain about gradient slope that is used in the research as standard. Is there prerequisite to determine parallelism standart?
Response: To determine whether curve of serial dilution samples was parallel with the curve of hormone standard (C and T), the slope of the serial dilution samples curve must be compare with the slope of the standard curve. For this, we can do a statistical analysis to compare the value of the slope from dilution samples curve and standard curev. We can determine that the both slopes (sample curve and standard curve) were parallel when there was not significant different between slope of dilution sample curve with standard curve. From our results, Slope of Sample one and sample two were not significant different with the slope of the standard curve (p>0.05). It is indicated that both slope are similar.

14. Why biology validation should be done? Is parallelism test based on dilution can be confirmed? In the real condition, does the treatment should be validated by biology validation? Does parallelism test not enough?

Response: To test the reliability of the aasay, there are several validations should be done namely: analytical validation, physiological validation, and biological validation. Parallellism is one part of the analytical validation. This test aimed to evaluate whether antigen (hormone) can bind with the antibody in the assay accurately and find the optimal dilution if needed. However, parallelism test is not a marker of specificity of the assay, but a
proof of a dose–response relationship (Möstl et al., 2005). Therefore, it is not possible to select
the best-suited assays to assess physiological stress and reproduction only based on the parallelism results. To achieve that, it is important to perform a biological validation or physiological validation. For physiological validation of stress hormone, a widely used method is an adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) challenge test by injecting animals with ACTH (for review see Tauma & Palme 2005 ) and by injecting radiolabeled testosterone [4(C)-14C testosterone] for testosterone validation (Möhle et al. 2002).
Response to Reviewer 1.
First, we would like to thanks to the reviewer 1 for approved our paper. Her comments and suggestions have helped us to further improve the paper. As you will see in the response-to-reviewer below, we have answered all points raised and have changed the paper accordingly.

1. Do not use personal pronouns. Please don't use we, I etc
Response: It has been changed throughout the text.

2. Choose the most 5 important words
Response: In the guideline, it was mentioned that we can use until 8 keywords. We still keep the keywords because using more keywords will help people to find our paper.

3. Do not use abbreviation word on the beginning of the line
Response: It has been changed throughout the text.

4. Is there any correlation between C and T in this case?
Response:Yes there is a correlation between cortisol and testosterone in some animals from previous studies. From the previous study, high levels of cortisol can suppres the testosterone production.
An additional sentence and references have been added in the revised paper

5. Due to the same base form of steroid (cyclopentanoperhydrophenantrend), we can use the same kit for animal as in human.
Response: Thank you for your suggestion, This statement has been mentioned in the discussion section.

6. Do not use personal pronouns
Response: It has been changed throughout texts

7. Should be done by veterinarians
Response: During the study, our team was accompanied by a veterinarian during data collection.Blood samples were performed by veterinarians. This statement has been written in the paper ( ethical statement, collection and processing of blood samples)

8. How to validate the data, because the samples are less than it should be?
Response: We have added the number of samples. Now, 32 Aceh cattle were used: 16 bulls and 16 cows. For the testosterone validation test, all cattle ( 16 bulls and 16 cows) were used. For cortisol validation test, 16 cattle ( 8 bulls and 8 cows ) were used which is taken from 32 Aceh cattle above. The explanation has been added in the revised paper

9. Please add some information of the feed and the volume per head.
Response: Feed given to the cattle is grass at 10% of body weight and 1% of body weight of rice bran and tofu dregs. The explanation has been added in the revised paper

10. until the assay process are conducted
Response: Thank you for your suggestion, we have added some words in revised paper

11. Please add sign of significant on testosterone
Response: Superskrip “ a” has been added to the testosterone data in the Figure 3, because they showed not significant different. Table 2. has been deleted from the revised paper.

12. Due to the same base form, the kit also can be used in animals as in human. Please add this explanation
Response: The explanation has been added in the discussion section, paragraph 3^rd in revised paper

13. Please explain about gradient slope that is used in the research as standard. Is there prerequisite to determine parallelism standart?
Response: To determine whether curve of serial dilution samples was parallel with the curve of hormone standard (C and T), the slope of the serial dilution samples curve must be compare with the slope of the standard curve. For this, we can do a statistical analysis to compare the value of the slope from dilution samples curve and standard curev. We can determine that the both slopes (sample curve and standard curve) were parallel when there was not significant different between slope of dilution sample curve with standard curve. From our results, Slope of Sample one and sample two were not significant different with the slope of the standard curve (p>0.05). It is indicated that both slope are similar.

14. Why biology validation should be done? Is parallelism test based on dilution can be confirmed? In the real condition, does the treatment should be validated by biology validation? Does parallelism test not enough?

Response: To test the reliability of the aasay, there are several validations should be done namely: analytical validation, physiological validation, and biological validation. Parallellism is one part of the analytical validation. This test aimed to evaluate whether antigen (hormone) can bind with the antibody in the assay accurately and find the optimal dilution if needed. However, parallelism test is not a marker of specificity of the assay, but a
proof of a dose–response relationship (Möstl et al., 2005). Therefore, it is not possible to select
the best-suited assays to assess physiological stress and reproduction only based on the parallelism results. To achieve that, it is important to perform a biological validation or physiological validation. For physiological validation of stress hormone, a widely used method is an adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) challenge test by injecting animals with ACTH (for review see Tauma & Palme 2005 ) and by injecting radiolabeled testosterone [4(C)-14C testosterone] for testosterone validation (Möhle et al. 2002).
Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests Close
Report a concern
Respond or Comment

COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT

Author Response 04 Feb 2020

Gholib Gholib, Physiology Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, 23111, Indonesia

04 Feb 2020

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 1.
First, we would like to thanks to the reviewer 1 for approved our paper. Her comments and suggestions have helped us to further improve the paper. As ... Continue reading Response to Reviewer 1.
First, we would like to thanks to the reviewer 1 for approved our paper. Her comments and suggestions have helped us to further improve the paper. As you will see in the response-to-reviewer below, we have answered all points raised and have changed the paper accordingly.

1. Do not use personal pronouns. Please don't use we, I etc
Response: It has been changed throughout the text.

2. Choose the most 5 important words
Response: In the guideline, it was mentioned that we can use until 8 keywords. We still keep the keywords because using more keywords will help people to find our paper.

3. Do not use abbreviation word on the beginning of the line
Response: It has been changed throughout the text.

4. Is there any correlation between C and T in this case?
Response:Yes there is a correlation between cortisol and testosterone in some animals from previous studies. From the previous study, high levels of cortisol can suppres the testosterone production.
An additional sentence and references have been added in the revised paper

5. Due to the same base form of steroid (cyclopentanoperhydrophenantrend), we can use the same kit for animal as in human.
Response: Thank you for your suggestion, This statement has been mentioned in the discussion section.

6. Do not use personal pronouns
Response: It has been changed throughout texts

7. Should be done by veterinarians
Response: During the study, our team was accompanied by a veterinarian during data collection.Blood samples were performed by veterinarians. This statement has been written in the paper ( ethical statement, collection and processing of blood samples)

8. How to validate the data, because the samples are less than it should be?
Response: We have added the number of samples. Now, 32 Aceh cattle were used: 16 bulls and 16 cows. For the testosterone validation test, all cattle ( 16 bulls and 16 cows) were used. For cortisol validation test, 16 cattle ( 8 bulls and 8 cows ) were used which is taken from 32 Aceh cattle above. The explanation has been added in the revised paper

9. Please add some information of the feed and the volume per head.
Response: Feed given to the cattle is grass at 10% of body weight and 1% of body weight of rice bran and tofu dregs. The explanation has been added in the revised paper

10. until the assay process are conducted
Response: Thank you for your suggestion, we have added some words in revised paper

11. Please add sign of significant on testosterone
Response: Superskrip “ a” has been added to the testosterone data in the Figure 3, because they showed not significant different. Table 2. has been deleted from the revised paper.

12. Due to the same base form, the kit also can be used in animals as in human. Please add this explanation
Response: The explanation has been added in the discussion section, paragraph 3^rd in revised paper

13. Please explain about gradient slope that is used in the research as standard. Is there prerequisite to determine parallelism standart?
Response: To determine whether curve of serial dilution samples was parallel with the curve of hormone standard (C and T), the slope of the serial dilution samples curve must be compare with the slope of the standard curve. For this, we can do a statistical analysis to compare the value of the slope from dilution samples curve and standard curev. We can determine that the both slopes (sample curve and standard curve) were parallel when there was not significant different between slope of dilution sample curve with standard curve. From our results, Slope of Sample one and sample two were not significant different with the slope of the standard curve (p>0.05). It is indicated that both slope are similar.

14. Why biology validation should be done? Is parallelism test based on dilution can be confirmed? In the real condition, does the treatment should be validated by biology validation? Does parallelism test not enough?

Response: To test the reliability of the aasay, there are several validations should be done namely: analytical validation, physiological validation, and biological validation. Parallellism is one part of the analytical validation. This test aimed to evaluate whether antigen (hormone) can bind with the antibody in the assay accurately and find the optimal dilution if needed. However, parallelism test is not a marker of specificity of the assay, but a
proof of a dose–response relationship (Möstl et al., 2005). Therefore, it is not possible to select
the best-suited assays to assess physiological stress and reproduction only based on the parallelism results. To achieve that, it is important to perform a biological validation or physiological validation. For physiological validation of stress hormone, a widely used method is an adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) challenge test by injecting animals with ACTH (for review see Tauma & Palme 2005 ) and by injecting radiolabeled testosterone [4(C)-14C testosterone] for testosterone validation (Möhle et al. 2002).
Response to Reviewer 1.
First, we would like to thanks to the reviewer 1 for approved our paper. Her comments and suggestions have helped us to further improve the paper. As you will see in the response-to-reviewer below, we have answered all points raised and have changed the paper accordingly.

1. Do not use personal pronouns. Please don't use we, I etc
Response: It has been changed throughout the text.

2. Choose the most 5 important words
Response: In the guideline, it was mentioned that we can use until 8 keywords. We still keep the keywords because using more keywords will help people to find our paper.

3. Do not use abbreviation word on the beginning of the line
Response: It has been changed throughout the text.

4. Is there any correlation between C and T in this case?
Response:Yes there is a correlation between cortisol and testosterone in some animals from previous studies. From the previous study, high levels of cortisol can suppres the testosterone production.
An additional sentence and references have been added in the revised paper

5. Due to the same base form of steroid (cyclopentanoperhydrophenantrend), we can use the same kit for animal as in human.
Response: Thank you for your suggestion, This statement has been mentioned in the discussion section.

6. Do not use personal pronouns
Response: It has been changed throughout texts

7. Should be done by veterinarians
Response: During the study, our team was accompanied by a veterinarian during data collection.Blood samples were performed by veterinarians. This statement has been written in the paper ( ethical statement, collection and processing of blood samples)

8. How to validate the data, because the samples are less than it should be?
Response: We have added the number of samples. Now, 32 Aceh cattle were used: 16 bulls and 16 cows. For the testosterone validation test, all cattle ( 16 bulls and 16 cows) were used. For cortisol validation test, 16 cattle ( 8 bulls and 8 cows ) were used which is taken from 32 Aceh cattle above. The explanation has been added in the revised paper

9. Please add some information of the feed and the volume per head.
Response: Feed given to the cattle is grass at 10% of body weight and 1% of body weight of rice bran and tofu dregs. The explanation has been added in the revised paper

10. until the assay process are conducted
Response: Thank you for your suggestion, we have added some words in revised paper

11. Please add sign of significant on testosterone
Response: Superskrip “ a” has been added to the testosterone data in the Figure 3, because they showed not significant different. Table 2. has been deleted from the revised paper.

12. Due to the same base form, the kit also can be used in animals as in human. Please add this explanation
Response: The explanation has been added in the discussion section, paragraph 3^rd in revised paper

13. Please explain about gradient slope that is used in the research as standard. Is there prerequisite to determine parallelism standart?
Response: To determine whether curve of serial dilution samples was parallel with the curve of hormone standard (C and T), the slope of the serial dilution samples curve must be compare with the slope of the standard curve. For this, we can do a statistical analysis to compare the value of the slope from dilution samples curve and standard curev. We can determine that the both slopes (sample curve and standard curve) were parallel when there was not significant different between slope of dilution sample curve with standard curve. From our results, Slope of Sample one and sample two were not significant different with the slope of the standard curve (p>0.05). It is indicated that both slope are similar.

14. Why biology validation should be done? Is parallelism test based on dilution can be confirmed? In the real condition, does the treatment should be validated by biology validation? Does parallelism test not enough?

Response: To test the reliability of the aasay, there are several validations should be done namely: analytical validation, physiological validation, and biological validation. Parallellism is one part of the analytical validation. This test aimed to evaluate whether antigen (hormone) can bind with the antibody in the assay accurately and find the optimal dilution if needed. However, parallelism test is not a marker of specificity of the assay, but a
proof of a dose–response relationship (Möstl et al., 2005). Therefore, it is not possible to select
the best-suited assays to assess physiological stress and reproduction only based on the parallelism results. To achieve that, it is important to perform a biological validation or physiological validation. For physiological validation of stress hormone, a widely used method is an adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) challenge test by injecting animals with ACTH (for review see Tauma & Palme 2005 ) and by injecting radiolabeled testosterone [4(C)-14C testosterone] for testosterone validation (Möhle et al. 2002).
Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests Close
Report a concern

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 3

VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 30 Jul 2019

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

	Invited Reviewers
	1	2
Version 3 (revision) 06 Mar 20
Version 2 (revision) 04 Feb 20	read	read
Version 1 30 Jul 19	read	read

Pudji Astuti, Gadjah Mada University (UGM), Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Annaïs Carbajal, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Comments on this article

All Comments(0)

Add a comment

Browse by related subjects

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

14 Views

27 Feb 2020 | for Version 2

Annaïs Carbajal, Department of Animal Health and Anatomy, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

14 Views Cite this report Responses(1)

Approved

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Endocrinology and animal stress

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (1)

Author Response

06 Mar 2020

Gholib Gholib, Physiology Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, 23111, Indonesia

Response to Reviewer 1 and 2.
First, we would like to thanks to reviewer 1 and 2 for their review and approved our paper (version 2). Minor comments and suggestions from reviewer 2 have helped us to further improve this paper. We have changed the paper according to all points raised. Each objective has been added with the hypothesis. Explanations of sample one and sample two used for parallelism test were added. Some grammatical errors and typing errors have been improved.

View more View less

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

16 Views

05 Feb 2020 | for Version 2

Pudji Astuti, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Gadjah Mada University (UGM), Yogyakarta, Indonesia

16 Views Cite this report Responses(1)

Approved

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (1)

Author Response

06 Mar 2020

Gholib Gholib, Physiology Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, 23111, Indonesia

View more View less

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

18 Views

16 Oct 2019 | for Version 1

Annaïs Carbajal, Department of Animal Health and Anatomy, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

18 Views Cite this report Responses(1)

Approved With Reservations

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Endocrinology and animal stress

Respond to this report

Responses (1)

Author Response

04 Feb 2020

Gholib Gholib, Physiology Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, 23111, Indonesia

Response to Reviewer 2.
First, we would like to thanks to the reviewer 2 for reviewing our paper and gave approved with reservations . Her comments and suggestions have helped us to further improve the paper. As you will see in the response-to-reviewer below, we have answered all points raised and have changed the paper accordingly. We very much hope that the paper is now finally approved.

1. New sentence should not start with an abbreviation. This needs to be rectified in the whole text
Response: All abbreviation in new sentences have been changed throughout text.

2. T is also produced by the ovaries and the adrenals
Response: Yes, you are right, T is also produced by the ovaries and the adrenals. An explanation has been added in revised paper

3. Could also be due to species-specific differences?Response: Yes, it can be influence by species-specific differences, Thank you very much for the revision. It has been added to the revised paper.

4. The aims of the study are not fully clear here. As three different results are discused, I would recommend dividing the aims in 3 clear objectives: Analytical validation, biological validation and freeze-thaw cycles
Response: Thank you very much for your suggestion. Now, The aims were dividedinto three objectives. The objective of the present study were: First, conducting an analytical validation test to examine the reliability of commercial C (Cat. no. EIA-1887) and T (Cat. no. EIA-1559) ELISA kits that accurately measure C and T concentrations, respectively in Aceh cattle; Second, performing a biological validation test to examine the reliability of commercial C ELISA kit (Cat. no. EIA-1887) to the response a stress event by comparing C concentrations before and after transportation and the reliability of T ELISA kit (Cat. no. EIA-1559) ELISA kits in discriminating the T concentrations from different sexes (bulls versus cows). The hypothesis is that C concentrations should be higher following transportation and the T concentration should be higher in bulls. Finally, the stability of C and T concentrations in the serum of Aceh cattle after exposure to several repeated freeze-thaw cycles was evaluated. For details, please see in the revised paper.

5. This is not totally true since only 5 individuals are used for the C validation.
Response: Thank you for your correction. Thank you for your correction. We have collected additional samples ( 10 bulls and 10 cows) to increase the number of samples. Now, in total 32 Aceh cattle were used: 16 bulls and 16 cows. For the testosterone validation test, all cattle ( 16 bulls and 16 cows) were used. For cortisol validation test, 16 cattle ( 8 bulls and 8 cows ) were used which is taken from 32 Aceh cattle above. The explanation has been added in the revised paper.

6. Information is lacking here. For example, why did you collect samples at 16h and 6h? This information should go to the subsection "biological validation" - experimental design.
Response: For biological validation of C, Samples were collected at 16 h, four hours after the trip to monitor the increase in Cortisol after the transportation. For biological validation of T, Samples were collected in the morning (6h-8h) because in some speceies including cattle, there is diurnal variation of T in blood which concentration of T ishigher in the morning compared to afternoon. This explanation has been added to the subsection of biological validation.

7. Hypothesis are written in the introduction
Response: Hypothesis has been deleted in this section and moved to the subsection “ introduction”.

8. Why serum was collected a day before and not immediately before transport? Please, specify the time of day when samples were collected.Response: Sample was collected a day before to prevent the stress in cattle and sometimes blood collection in cattle needs some times. More explanation has been added in the revised paper

9.This is mean and standard deviation? Please, specify
Response: Thank you very much for your correction, it has been added in the revise paper.

10. Ref 24 extended data 1 shows: Certificate of ethical clearance approval for using animals for study on monitoring reproduction and stress in aceh cattleData on the test of equality is not provided. Here the reference should be ref 26.
Indicate the name of the statistical model used to "test of equality of two slopes"
Response: Model used for the test of equality of two slopes is Logarithmic regression. Thank you for your correction, the reference No. was also changed.

11. More information is needed to interpret the data.Parallelism: indicate which test was made in order to obtain results of t and p
Dose response curve: is this a different test or they are results from the parallelism test? Do the equations provide extra information with regard to the parallelism test results (t and p)?
Response: Thank you for your suggestion. For the parallelism, a test of equality of two slopes was used to compare between standard slope (C and T) and slope of sample one and sample two obtained from the regression equations. From the equations {dose respone curve) containing value of slope for standard , sample one and two. Based on the results, we compared the standard slope (C and T) with the slope of sample one and sample to see whether they are parallel to standard slope based on the the pvalueand t value. Since the pValue >0.05, it is indicated that these slopes are similar/parallelwith the standard slope (not significant different). More explanation has been added in the revised paper

12. Table 2 and Figure 3 provide the same information. If percentages were used to perform statistics, I suggest removing Table 2.
Response: Thank you for your suggestion, the Table 2 has been deleted fronm the revised paper

13. Reviewer 2: used to reliably measure C and T concentrations in serum of Aceh cattleResponse: Thank you, the specific assay used in each study has been added in the revised paper.

14. Reviewer 2: Please specify the matrix you are talking about
Response: Thank you, the specific assay used in each study has been added in the revised paper.
"The validation of commercial ELISA kits for measuring hormones in animals has been successfully conducted in several animals, such as progesterone in cattle using human progesterone ELISA kit (Clinpro International Co. LLC, Union City, CA 94587, USA) , estradiol-17-beta and inhibin A in buffalo using human ELISA kit (For estradiol: Cat No. EIA-2693, DRG Instruments GmbH, Marburg, Germany; For Inhibin A: Inhibin A DSL-10-28100, Diagnostic System Laboratories Inc, Webster, Texas, US), C in horses using Immunotech kit , and T in Kacang goats using T ELISA kit (Cat No. EIA-1559, DRG Instruments GmbH, Marburg, Germany) developed for human."

15. Your results suggest the opposite regarding the T levels Your results suggest the opposite regarding the T levels
Response: Thank you for your correction, Although, T wes decresed less 10%, but this is not significant. You are right, T is not significantly affected by freeze thaw cycles. The explanation has been improved.

16. Consider shortening the sentence or dividing the information in 2-3 shorter sentences. This way, it will be easier for the reader to understand.
Response: Thank you very much for your suggestion. The sentence has been divided into 4 shorter sentences.

17. Reviewer 2: Same as before. If the T concentrations remained stable, why do you say that T concentrations decreased?Response: Thank you, it has been corrected in the revised paper.

18. Reviewer 2: An important conclusion is lacking: The biological validation suggests that fluctuations of C and T in serum of Aceh cattle have a clear biological significance.
Response: Thank you for your suggestion. An additional conclusion has been added in the revised paper.
"In conclusion, our study shows that based on the analytical and biological validation tests, commercial C (EIA-1887) and T (EIA-1559) ELISA kits are reliable assays for measuring C and T, in serum of Aceh cattle. Moreover, biological validation showed that fluctuations of C and T in serum of Aceh cattle have a clear biological significance reflecting to the physiological condition of Aceh cattle. Results of the study also demonstrate that more than two repeated freeze-thaw cycles significantly affected the stability of serum C concentrations, but up to eight repeated freeze-thaw cycles did not significantly affect the stability of serum T concentrations."

View more View less

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

31 Views

03 Sep 2019 | for Version 1

Pudji Astuti, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Gadjah Mada University (UGM), Yogyakarta, Indonesia

31 Views Cite this report Responses(1)

Approved

The details comment of the paper are attached (Please see attachment).
Overall the content are complete including the validation test and the Biological validation are conducted.
The theory of similarity base chemical formula namely cyclopentano perhydro phenanthrene both of human and animal should be added.
The information standard of parallelism should be added.
Although the number of samples is less than specified (based on the Frederer formula), the results can still be accounted for because the amount of 12 samples is still very sufficient considering the large number of replications.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (1)

Author Response

04 Feb 2020

Gholib Gholib, Physiology Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, 23111, Indonesia

Response to Reviewer 1.
First, we would like to thanks to the reviewer 1 for approved our paper. Her comments and suggestions have helped us to further improve the paper. As you will see in the response-to-reviewer below, we have answered all points raised and have changed the paper accordingly.

1. Do not use personal pronouns. Please don't use we, I etc
Response: It has been changed throughout the text.

2. Choose the most 5 important words
Response: In the guideline, it was mentioned that we can use until 8 keywords. We still keep the keywords because using more keywords will help people to find our paper.

3. Do not use abbreviation word on the beginning of the line
Response: It has been changed throughout the text.

4. Is there any correlation between C and T in this case?
Response:Yes there is a correlation between cortisol and testosterone in some animals from previous studies. From the previous study, high levels of cortisol can suppres the testosterone production.
An additional sentence and references have been added in the revised paper

5. Due to the same base form of steroid (cyclopentanoperhydrophenantrend), we can use the same kit for animal as in human.
Response: Thank you for your suggestion, This statement has been mentioned in the discussion section.

6. Do not use personal pronouns
Response: It has been changed throughout texts

7. Should be done by veterinarians
Response: During the study, our team was accompanied by a veterinarian during data collection.Blood samples were performed by veterinarians. This statement has been written in the paper ( ethical statement, collection and processing of blood samples)

8. How to validate the data, because the samples are less than it should be?
Response: We have added the number of samples. Now, 32 Aceh cattle were used: 16 bulls and 16 cows. For the testosterone validation test, all cattle ( 16 bulls and 16 cows) were used. For cortisol validation test, 16 cattle ( 8 bulls and 8 cows ) were used which is taken from 32 Aceh cattle above. The explanation has been added in the revised paper

9. Please add some information of the feed and the volume per head.
Response: Feed given to the cattle is grass at 10% of body weight and 1% of body weight of rice bran and tofu dregs. The explanation has been added in the revised paper

10. until the assay process are conducted
Response: Thank you for your suggestion, we have added some words in revised paper

11. Please add sign of significant on testosterone
Response: Superskrip “ a” has been added to the testosterone data in the Figure 3, because they showed not significant different. Table 2. has been deleted from the revised paper.

12. Due to the same base form, the kit also can be used in animals as in human. Please add this explanation
Response: The explanation has been added in the discussion section, paragraph 3^rd in revised paper

13. Please explain about gradient slope that is used in the research as standard. Is there prerequisite to determine parallelism standart?
Response: To determine whether curve of serial dilution samples was parallel with the curve of hormone standard (C and T), the slope of the serial dilution samples curve must be compare with the slope of the standard curve. For this, we can do a statistical analysis to compare the value of the slope from dilution samples curve and standard curev. We can determine that the both slopes (sample curve and standard curve) were parallel when there was not significant different between slope of dilution sample curve with standard curve. From our results, Slope of Sample one and sample two were not significant different with the slope of the standard curve (p>0.05). It is indicated that both slope are similar.

14. Why biology validation should be done? Is parallelism test based on dilution can be confirmed? In the real condition, does the treatment should be validated by biology validation? Does parallelism test not enough?

Response: To test the reliability of the aasay, there are several validations should be done namely: analytical validation, physiological validation, and biological validation. Parallellism is one part of the analytical validation. This test aimed to evaluate whether antigen (hormone) can bind with the antibody in the assay accurately and find the optimal dilution if needed. However, parallelism test is not a marker of specificity of the assay, but a
proof of a dose–response relationship (Möstl et al., 2005). Therefore, it is not possible to select
the best-suited assays to assess physiological stress and reproduction only based on the parallelism results. To achieve that, it is important to perform a biological validation or physiological validation. For physiological validation of stress hormone, a widely used method is an adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) challenge test by injecting animals with ACTH (for review see Tauma & Palme 2005 ) and by injecting radiolabeled testosterone [4(C)-14C testosterone] for testosterone validation (Möhle et al. 2002).

View more View less

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:

Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested

Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.

Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

[1] 1. Sheriff MJ, Dantzer B, Delehanty B, et al.: Measuring stress in wildlife: techniques for quantifying glucocorticoids. Oecologia. 2011; 166(4): 869–887. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[2] 2. Hardy MP, Gao HB, Dong Q, et al.: Stress hormone and male reproductive function. Cell Tissue Res. 2005; 322(1): 147–153. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[3] 3. Chedrese PJ: Reproductive Endocrinology: A Moleculer approach. Springer Science + Madia Business, New York, USA. 2009. Publisher Full Text

[4] 4. Möstl E, Palme R: Hormones as indicators of stress. Dom Anim Endocrinol. 2002; 23(1–2): 67–74. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[5] 5. Gholib G, Wahyuni S, Kadar OH, et al.: Measurement of serum testosterone in kacang goat by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (elisa) technique: the importance of kit validation. J Ked Hewan. 2016; 10(1): 32–36. Publisher Full Text

[6] 6. Du Z, Keeley T, Janssen T, et al.: Measurement of testosterone and cortisol metabolites and luteinising hormone in captive southern hairy-nosed wombat (Lasiorhinus latifrons) urine. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2017; 250: 70–79. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[7] 7. Nugraha TP, Heistermann M, Agil M, et al.: Validation of a field-friendly extraction and storage method to monitor fecal steroid metabolites in wild orangutans. Primates. 2017; 58(2): 285–294. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[8] 8. Gholib G, Heistermann M, Agil M, et al.: Comparison of fecal preservation and extraction methods for steroid hormone metabolite analysis in wild crested macaques. Primates. 2018; 59(3): 281–292. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[9] 9. Durdiaková J, Fábryová H, Koborová I, et al.: The effects of saliva collection, handling and storage on salivary testosterone measurement. Steroids. 2013; 78(14): 1325–1331. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[10] 10. Bloomer RJ: Considerations in the Measurement of Testosterone in Saliva and Serum using ELISA Procedures. Br J Med Med Res. 2015; 5(1): 116–122. Publisher Full Text

[11] 11. Stradaioli G, Peric T, Montillo M, et al.: Hair cortisol and testosterone concentrations and semen production of Bos taurus bulls. Ital J Anim Sci. 2017; 16(4): 631–639. Publisher Full Text

[12] 12. Dorgan JF, Fears TR, McMahon RP, et al.: Measurement of steroid sex hormones in serum: a comparison of radioimmunoassay and mass spectrometry. Steroids. 2002; 67(3–4): 151–158. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[13] 13. Sakamoto S, Putalun W, Vimolmangkang S, et al.: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the quantitative/qualitative analysis of plant secondary metabolites. J Nat Med. 2018; 72(1): 32–42. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[14] 14. Kinn Rød AM, Harkestad N, Jellestad FK, et al.: Comparison of commercial ELISA assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1): 6748. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[15] 15. Rangel-Negrin A, Flores-Escobar E, Chavira R, et al.: Physiological and analytical validations of fecal steroid hormone measures in black howler monkeys. Primates. 2014; 55(4): 456–65. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[16] 16. Gholib G, Agil M, Supriatna I, et al.: Repeated freeze-thaw cycles but not short-term storage of fecal extracts at ambient temperature influence the stability of steroid metabolite levels in crested macaques. J Ked Hewan. 2017; 11(2): 78–85. Publisher Full Text

[17] 17. Hodges JK, Heistermann M: Field Endocrinology: Monitoring Hormonal Changes in Free-Ranging Primates. In: Setchell JM, Curtis DJ (eds) Field and Laboratory Methods in Primatology: A Practical Guide. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 2011; 353–370. Publisher Full Text

[18] 18. Bielohuby M, Popp S, Bidlingmaier M: A guide for measurement of circulating metabolic hormones in rodents: Pitfalls during the pre-analytical phase. Mol Metab. 2012; 1(1–2): 47–60. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[19] 19. Hillebrand JJ, Heijboer AC, Endert E: Effects of repeated freeze-thaw cycles on endocrine parameters in plasma and serum. Ann Clin Biochem. 2017; 54(2): 289–292. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[20] 20. Reyna R, Traynor KD, Hines G, et al.: Repeated freezing and thawing does not generally alter assay results for several commonly studied reproductive hormones. Fertil Steril. 2001; 76(4): 823–825. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[21] 21. Comstock GW, Burke AE, Norkus EP, et al.: Effects of Repeated Freeze-Thaw Cycles on Concentrations of Cholesterol, Micronutrients, and Hormones in Human Plasma and Serum. Clin Chem. 2001; 47(1): 139–142. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[22] 22. Tahir MZ, Thoumire S, Raffaelli M, et al.: Effect of blood handling conditions on progesterone assay results obtained by chemiluminescence in the bitch. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2013; 45(3): 141–144. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[23] 23. Kley HK, Rick W: The effect of storage and temperature on the analysis of steroids in plasma and blood. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1984; 22(5): 371–378. PubMed Abstract

[24] 24. Bauman JE: Stability of radioimmunoassayable steroid and protein hormones after repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Clin Chem. 1982; 28(11): 2336–2337. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[25] 25. Gholib G, Wahyuni S, Akmal M, et al.: Extended data 1. figshare. Figure. 2019. http://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.8487830.v1

[26] 26. Zar JH: Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J. 1996.

[27] 27. Gholib G, Wahyuni S, Akmal M, et al.: Dataset 1. figshare. Dataset. 2019. http://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.8342504.v2

[28] 28. Gholib G, Wahyuni S, Akmal M, et al.: Dataset 2 v2. figshare. Dataset. 2020. http://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11678352

[29] 29. Gholib G, Wahyuni S, Akmal M, et al.: Dataset 3. figshare. Dataset. 2019. http://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.8342720.v1

[30] 30. Sapolsky RM, Romero LM, Munck AU: How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions. Endocr Rev. 2000; 21(1): 55–89. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[31] 31. Swerdloff RS, Wang C, Sinha-Hikim AP: Hypothalamic–pituitary-gonadal axis in men. In: Pfaff DW, Arnold AP, Etgen AM, Fahrbach SE, Rubin RT (eds) Hormones, brain, and behavior. 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego. 2009; Part V: 2357–2395. Publisher Full Text

[32] 32. Hodges K, Brown J, Heistermann M: Endocrine monitoring of reproduction and stress. In: Kleiman DG, Thompson KV, Kirk Baer C (eds) Wild mammals in captivity: principles and techniques for zoo management. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 2010; 447–468. Reference Source

[33] 33. Heistermann M, Palme R, Ganswindt A: Comparison of different enzyme-immunoassays for assessment of adrenocortical activity in primates based on fecal analysis. Am J Primatol. 2006; 68(3): 257–273. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[34] 34. Möstl E, Messmann S, Bagu E, et al.: Measurement of glucocorticoid metabolite concentrations in faeces of domestic livestock. Zentralbl Veterinarmed A. 1999; 46(10): 621–631. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[35] 35. Bayemi PH, Nsongka VM, Perera BMAO, et al.: Validation of a human progesterone enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kit for use on serum of cattle in Cameroon. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2007; 39(5): 335–338. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[36] 36. Todini S, Terzano GM, Malfatti A: Validation of ELISA kits for determination of Inhibin-A and Estradiol-17-beta concentrations in Buffalo plasma. Ital J Anim Sci. 2007; 6(sup2): 585–588. Publisher Full Text

[37] 37. Pawluski J, Jego P, Henry S, et al.: Low plasma cortisol and fecal cortisol metabolite measures as indicators of compromised welfare in domestic horses (Equus caballus). PLoS One. 2017; 12(9): e0182257. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[38] 38. Pappano DJ, Roberts EK, Beehner JC: Testing extraction and storage parameters for a fecal hormone method. Am J Primatol. 2010; 72(11): 934–941. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

The validation of a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and the effect of freeze-thaw cycles of serum on the stability of cortisol and testosterone concentrations in Aceh cattle

Abstract

Keywords

Revised Amendments from Version 2

Introduction

Methods

Ethical statement

Study animals

Collection and processing of blood samples

Validation of commercial C and T ELISA kits

Experiment design of freeze-thaw cycles

C and T concentration measurements

Data analysis

Results

The validity of commercial ELISA kits for measuring C and T in the serum of cattle

Figure 1. Curves of parallelism test from the serial dilution of tested samples (serum of Aceh cattle) and cortisol and testosterone standards are presented.

Table 1. Results of the analytical validation of the commercial cortisol (DRG, Cat. No. EIA-1887) and testosterone (DRG, Cat. No. EIA-1559) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits.

Figure 2. Results of the biological validation of the commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits.

C and T stabilities after exposure to repeated freeze-thaw cycles

Figure 3. Percentages of hormone concentrations in the serum exposed to repeated freeze-thaw cycles compared to control.

Discussion

Data availability

Underlying data

Extended data

Acknowledgments

References

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

Comments on this article

Browse by related subjects

Competing Interests Policy

Stay Updated