ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Brief Report
RETRACTED: 

Non-intertwined strands of plasmid DNA contradicts the Watson and Crick model of DNA structure

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
PUBLISHED 01 Apr 2019

Retraction

At the request of the author, the article titled “Non-intertwined strands of plasmid DNA contradict the Watson and Crick model of DNA structure” [version 3;

...

Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Retraction 

At the request of the author, the article titled “Non-intertwined strands of plasmid DNA contradict the Watson and Crick model of DNA structure” [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2020, 8:356 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.18134.3) has been retracted from F1000Research. Previous versions of this article published on F1000Research have also been retracted (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.18134.1; https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.18134.2).

Since publication, Dr Pawan Kumar has performed additional experiments on the structure of a DNA molecule and was not able to generate further results that support this article. As such, they are no longer confident in the conclusions drawn in this article, and wish to retract. They apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Abstract

According to Watson and Crick (W/C) model, a DNA molecule consists of two antiparallel polynucleotide chains, intertwined with each other. Although the W/C model is accepted widely, a number of researchers have raised questions against it and proposed alternative structures for DNA. In the present study, the W/C model was examined using plasmid DNA. It was hypothesized that two strands of plasmid DNA will remain intertwined and not separate from each other under denaturing conditions, if it follows the W/C model. To test this, plasmid DNA was denatured using sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and analyzed by gel electrophoresis. It was observed that addition of NaOH to pUC19 and pBR322 plasmids resulted in new form of DNA with higher electrophoretic mobility in agarose gel. DNA corresponding to higher electrophoretic mobility band of pUC19 (hmP19) was single-stranded and circular, indicating the separation of two strands of pUC19 plasmid. Next, we examined whether hmP19 DNA can re-anneal to form native pUC19 plasmid. It was observed that neutralization of NaOH resulted in the appearance of native pUC19 plasmid in denatured DNA. Native pUC19 was also formed by hmP19 DNA extracted from agarose gel and was found to be digestible with Hind III. Ability to confer ampicillin resistance in transformed Escherichia coli demonstrated the functionality of pUC19 plasmid formed by extracted hmP19 DNA. Reversible separation of two strands of plasmid into single-stranded circular DNA shows that DNA strands are not intertwined with each other and contradicts the W/C model of DNA structure.

Keywords

DNA structure, Watson and Crick model, plasmid denaturation, single-stranded circular DNA, non-helical structure, side-by-side model.

Abbreviations

DNA, Deoxyribonucleic acid

NaOH, Sodium hydroxide

HCl, Hydrochloric acid

hmP19, higher electrophoretic mobility band of pUC19 plasmid.

Introduction

DNA is the genetic material of all organisms, with the exception of some viruses. The currently accepted model of DNA structure was proposed by James Watson and Francis Crick in 19531. According to this model, a DNA molecule consists of two antiparallel polynucleotide chains, intertwined with each other. Although the Watson and Crick (W/C) model is accepted widely, some researchers have raised questions against it and proposed alternative models for DNA structure2,3. Among these, Rodley’s model which envisaged that two strands of a DNA molecule are held side-by-side has generated significant interest and curiosity in the scientific community2.

In the present study, the W/C model of DNA structure was examined with the help of plasmid DNA. It was hypothesized that two strands of a plasmid will remain intertwined and not separate into single-stranded circular DNA molecules under denaturing conditions, if it follows the W/C model. To test this, pUC19 and pBR322 plasmids were denatured using sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and analyzed by gel electrophoresis. Interestingly, addition of NaOH to pUC19 and pBR322 plasmids resulted in new form of DNA showing higher electrophoretic mobility in agarose gel. DNA corresponding to higher electrophoretic mobility band of pUC19 (hmP19) was found to be single-stranded and circular, suggesting the separation of two strands of plasmid DNA. Under suitable conditions, hmP19 DNA re-annealed to form native pUC19 plasmid. These results showed that two strands of a DNA molecule are not intertwined with each other and contradicted the W/C model of DNA structure.

Methods

Plasmid isolation, denaturation and agarose gel electrophoresis

pUC19 and pBR322 plasmids were isolated from E. coli strains [cultured in Luria Bertani broth (HiMedia, catalogue# M1245) in a shaking incubator at 37°C] by alkaline-lysis method as described previously4. For denaturation, approximately 5 µg plasmid DNA (concentration determined using NanoDrop spectrophotometer) was added with an equal volume (5 µl) of NaOH solution of indicated concentration.

Digestion of plasmid DNA and polymerase chain reaction

NaOH in denatured pUC19 solution was neutralized using 5 µl HCl (concentration, 0.5 M) and plasmid was incubated with Hind III (SibEnzyme, catalogue# E073), S1 nuclease (Promega Corporation, catalogue# E576A) or exonuclease I and alkaline phosphatase (Thermo Scientific, catalogue# EN0581 and EF0651, respectively) at room temperature for 30 min. Samples were immediately run on 1% agarose gel. A mix of forward primer (5’-CTGCTTTCCTGCATGTTC-3’) and reverse primer (5’-AAGCCCTTGCTTCTTATACT-3’) (experimental control) was also digested with exonuclease I and alkaline phosphatase. Digested and undigested primers were used in polymerase chain reaction [initial denaturation, 95°C/3 min followed by 30 cycles of (i) 95°C/30 sec, (ii) 55°C/30 sec, (iii) 72°C/30 in the same order] to amplify target sequence in A2780 cell line genomic DNA. PCR product was analyzed on 1% agarose gel.

DNA extraction from agarose gel

hmP19 DNA bands were cut with the help of a clean knife. DNA was purified using an extraction kit, as suggested by manufacturer (FairBiotech, catalogue# DE0100). Briefly, gel was dissolved in DE buffer and passed through a column. After washing with buffers, DNA was eluted in 50 μl nuclease free water.

Bacterial transformation

Transformation of E. coli strain DH5-alpha with gel-extracted plasmid DNA was carried out by heat-shock method (42°C for 30 sec) using water bath. Transformed and non-transformed bacteria were spread on ampicillin-nutrient agar plates supplemented with 25 µl X-Gal (Himedia, catalogue# MB0690. Plates were kept overnight in a 37°C incubator.

Results and discussion

Two strands of a DNA molecule are held together by non-covalent interactions, which can be disrupted by increasing the pH of DNA solution5. In the present study, approximately 5 µg of plasmid DNA was denatured by adding NaOH solution of increasing concentration. It was observed that addition of 0.5 N NaOH to pUC19 resulted in a new form of DNA showing higher electrophoretic mobility in agarose gel (Figure 1a, Underlying data6). Similar results were obtained with pBR322 plasmid added with 0.5 N NaOH (Figure 1b, Underlying data7). Formation of higher electrophoretic mobility DNA in pBR322 plasmid added with NaOH has also been reported previously8.

8bce0935-d910-43b7-b203-55ae3df7f0a3_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Double-stranded plasmid is denatured by NaOH into single-stranded circular DNA.

Approximately 5 µg plasmid DNA was added with an equal volume (5 µl) of NaOH solution of indicated concentration (normality, N) and run on 1% agarose gel. A distinct band of higher electrophoretic mobility DNA (marked by arrows) was observed in pUC19 (a) and pBR322 (b) plasmids added with 0.5 N NaOH. For enzymatic digestion, NaOH in denatured plasmid was neutralized using 0.5M HCl, followed by incubation with different enzymes. Native pUC19, but not hmP19 DNA was digested by Hind III, which acts on double-stranded DNA (c). S1 nuclease, which recognizes single-stranded DNA, degraded hmP19 DNA but not native pUC19 plasmid (d). Exonuclease I (Exo I) and alkaline phosphatase (AP), which eliminate single-stranded linear DNA, digested neither of native pUC19 or hmP19 DNA (e). Representative data of at least three independent experiments are shown.

DNA corresponding to higher electrophoretic mobility band of pUC19 (hmP19) was characterized using DNA modifying enzymes in next experiments. Incubation with Hind III, which acts on double-stranded DNA, digested pUC19 plasmid but not hmP19 DNA (Figure 1c, Underlying data9). S1 nuclease, which digests single-stranded DNA, degraded hmP19 DNA but not pUC19 plasmid (Figure 1d, Underlying data10). Exonuclease I and alkaline phosphatase, which would digest single-stranded linear DNA, degraded neither of pUC19 or hmP19 DNA (Figure 1e, Underlying data11). These results showed that hmP19 DNA is single-stranded and circular. Exonuclease I- and alkaline phosphatase-digested primers (experimental control) did not form product in PCR reaction (Supplementary Figure 1, Extended data12).

We asked whether hmP19 DNA was generated by separation of two strands of pUC19 or breakage of one strand followed by release of another one. Formation of a single band of higher electrophoretic mobility by denatured pUC19 (instead of two, which would have been the case when one strand was linearized and another was circular) suggested that hmP19 DNA was generated by separation of two strands of the plasmid (Figure 1a, b). To confirm this notion, hmP19 DNA was subjected to renaturing conditions. If hmP19 DNA were formed due to separation of two strands of pUC19, it would reanneal to form the native plasmid under suitable conditions. Interestingly, neutralization of NaOH with 0.25 M HCl resulted in the appearance of pUC19 plasmid in denatured DNA solution (Figure 2a, Underlying data13). To further confirm this, hmP19 DNA was extracted from gel and re-examined by gel electrophoresis. Both, gel-extracted hmP19 DNA and native plasmid DNA exhibited similar band patterns in the agarose gel (Figure 2b). These results showed that single-stranded circular hmP19 DNA was formed due to reversible separation of two strands of pUC19 plasmid DNA.

8bce0935-d910-43b7-b203-55ae3df7f0a3_figure2.gif

Figure 2. Single-stranded circular hmP19 DNA annealed to form double-stranded pUC19 plasmid.

pH of denatured pUC19 plasmid DNA was normalized using HCl solution of indicated concentration. Agarose gel electrophoresis showed the formation of native pUC19 plasmid DNA in denatured plasmid DNA solution added with 0.25 M HCl (a). hmP19 DNA was extracted from agarose gel and approximately 3 µg of it was rerun on 1% agarose gel. Band pattern of pUC19 plasmid formed by extracted hmP19 DNA was same as that of native pUC19 plasmid (b). Gel-extracted hmP19 DNA was incubated with Hind III and run on 1% agarose gel. Hind III digested the pUC19 plasmid formed by gel-extracted hmP19 DNA (c). E. coli strain DH5-alpha was transformed with gel-extracted hmP19 DNA by heat-shock method. hmP19 DNA-transformed (d), but not non-transformed (e) bacteria formed colonies on ampicillin-X-Gal-nutrient agar plates. Representative data of two-three independent experiments are shown.

Next, we characterized pUC19 plasmid formed by reannealing of gel-extracted hmP19 DNA. Interestingly, similar to the native plasmid, pUC19 plasmid formed by gel-extracted hmP19 DNA was also degraded by Hind III (Figure 2c). Functionality of pUC19 formed by gel-extracted hmP19 DNA was demonstrated by its ability to transform E. coli. hmP19 DNA-transformed bacteria acquired ampicillin resistance and formed colonies on ampicillin-nutrient agar plates supplemented with X-Gal (Figure 2d, Underlying data14). No colonies were formed by non-transformed bacteria (Figure 2e). These results showed that pUC19 plasmid formed by re-annealing of hmP19 DNA was structurally and functionally similar to native plasmid DNA.

Concludingly, reversible separation of two strands of plasmid DNA into single-stranded circular DNA molecules shows that DNA strands are not intertwined with each other. These findings contradict the W/C model of DNA structure and provide evidence for the side-by-side structure of DNA.

Data availability

Underlying data

Figshare: Addition of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) to pUC19 plasmid resulted in a distinct band of higher electrophoretic mobility DNA. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7751093.v66

This project contains the following underlying data:

  • puc naoh.tif (Gel image demonstrating plasmid mobility in varying NaOH concentrations)

Figshare: Addition of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) to pBR322 plasmid resulted in a distinct band of higher electrophoretic mobility DNA. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7751084.v57

This project contains the following underlying data:

  • pbr naoh.tif (Gel image demonstrating plasmid mobility in varying NaOH concentrations)

Figshare: Higher electrophoretic mobility band of pUC19 (hmP19) DNA is single-stranded in nature. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7751090.v310

This project contains the following underlying data:

  • puc s1nuclease.tif (Gel image showing plasmid products following incubation with S1 nuclease)

Figshare: Higher electrophoretic mobility band of pUC19 (hmP19) DNA is not double-stranded in nature. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7751087.v39

This project contains the following underlying data:

  • puc hind.tif (Gel image showing plasmid products following incubation with Hind III)

Figshare: Higher electrophoretic mobility band of pUC19 (hmP19) DNA is single-stranded and circular in nature. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7751081.v311

This project contains the following underlying data:

  • puc exo.tif (Gel image showing plasmid products following incubation with exonuclease I)

Figshare: pUC19 DNA formed by higher electrophoretic mobility band of pUC19 (hmP19) DNA demonstrates structural and functional properties of native plasmid14. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7751078

This project contains the following underlying data:

  • puc str fun.tif (Gel image showing plasmid products following digestion with Hind III and S1 nuclease, and plate images of bacteria transformed with purified hmP19)

Figshare: Single-stranded, circular higher electrophoretic mobility band of pUC19 (hmP19) DNA formed native double-stranded pUC19 plasmid with neutralization of sodium hydroxide (NaOH). https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7754375.v113

This project contains the following underlying data:

  • puc neutra.tif (Gel image showing plasmid products following denaturing with NaOH and subsequent neutralization with HCl)

Extended data

Figshare: Supplementary Figure 1: Exonuclease I- and alkaline phosphatase-digested primers did not form product in polymerase chain reaction (PCR). https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7754375.v112

This project contains the following extended data:

  • Supplimentary_Figure_1.jpg (Gel image showing digested primer products following incubation with exonuclease 1 and alkaline phosphatase)

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).

Comments on this article Comments (2)

Version 3
VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 10 Nov 2020
Revised
Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 01 Apr 2019
Discussion is closed on this version, please comment on the latest version above.
  • Reader Comment 07 Dec 2019
    You Cheng Xu, UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, retired scientist, USA
    07 Dec 2019
    Reader Comment
    The author is trying to argue the Watson-Crick Model with his experimental result observed from the faster mobility of denatured plasmids. Unfortunately, his explanation is completely wrong and cannot support ... Continue reading
  • Reader Comment 03 Aug 2019
    L.Kevin Lewis, Texas State University, USA
    03 Aug 2019
    Reader Comment
    It appears most likely that the fast moving denatured form of the plasmid is composed of interlocked (concatenated) single-stranded DNA circles. The molecules adopt an unusually small conformation that makes ... Continue reading
  • Discussion is closed on this version, please comment on the latest version above.
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Kumar P. RETRACTED: Non-intertwined strands of plasmid DNA contradicts the Watson and Crick model of DNA structure [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2019, 8:356 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.18134.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.