Home Browse RETRACTED:Enhanced conventional method is as precise as navigation...
ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
▬
✚
Retraction

RETRACTED: Enhanced conventional method is as precise as navigation for distal femur resection during total knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial

[version 1; peer review: not peer reviewed]
Rohan Bhimani
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1072-2360
1,2, Fardeen Bhimani3, Rohan Bir Singh
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2426-3900
4, Preeti Singh1,5
Rohan Bhimani
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1072-2360
1,2, Fardeen Bhimani3, Rohan Bir Singh
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2426-3900
4, Preeti Singh1,5
PUBLISHED 23 May 2019
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
NOT PEER REVIEWED

At the request of authors Rohan Bhimani, Fardeen Bhimani, Rohan Bir Singh, and Preeti Singh, the article titled “Enhanced conventional method is as precise as navigation for distal femur resection during total knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]” (doi: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.18154.1) has been retracted from F1000Research.

Since publication, it has come to the attention of the authors that the data collected for the two trial groups were combined; therefore, the study findings and conclusions cannot be relied upon. The authors apologise for this honest error.

F1000Research also became aware that the clinical trial registration data were obscured due to this error. Please note that this is not standard practice. The editorial office have appealed to both the authors and the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry to restore these data in order to maintain the integrity of the scientific record.

7th June 2019: The retraction notice has been updated to accurately reflect the status of the associated clinical trial registry.

Keywords

distal femur, total knee arthroplasty, valgus cut, computer navigated arthroplasty, alignment, conventional knee arthroplasty

Associated Research Article Rohan Bhimani, Fardeen Bhimani, Rohan Bir Singh, Preeti Singh » Enhanced conventional method is as precise as navigation for distal femur resection during total knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial, F1000Research 2019, 8:360 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.18154.1)
Corresponding author: Rohan Bhimani
Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.
Copyright:  © 2019 Bhimani R et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
How to cite: Bhimani R, Bhimani F, Singh RB and Singh P. RETRACTED: Enhanced conventional method is as precise as navigation for distal femur resection during total knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial [version 1; peer review: not peer reviewed]. F1000Research 2019, 8:717 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.19439.1) First published: 23 May 2019, 8:717 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.19439.1) Latest published: 23 May 2019, 8:717 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.19439.1)

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 23 May 2019
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Article Versions (1)
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
 - -
Citations
SEE MORE DETAILS
CITE
how to cite this article
Bhimani R, Bhimani F, Singh RB and Singh P. RETRACTED: Enhanced conventional method is as precise as navigation for distal femur resection during total knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial [version 1; peer review: not peer reviewed]. F1000Research 2019, 8:717 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.19439.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Current Reviewer Status:
NOT PEER REVIEWED
NOT PEER REVIEWED

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 23 May 2019
Comment

Not Peer Reviewed

This article is an Retraction and has not been subject to external peer review.

Comments on this article

All Comments(0)

Add a comment
Sign up for content alerts

Browse by related subjects

    Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
    Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
    Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
    Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
    Sign In
    If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

    The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
    Email address not valid, please try again

    You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

    To sign in, please click here.

    If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

    You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

    To sign in, please click here.

    If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

    Code not correct, please try again
    Email us for further assistance.
    Server error, please try again.