ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Note

Cadmium SAD phasing at CuKα wavelength

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
PUBLISHED 21 Jan 2019
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Mathematical, Physical, and Computational Sciences collection.

Abstract

Single-wavelength anomalous diffraction (SAD) is the most common method for de novo elucidation of macromolecular structures by X-ray crystallography. It requires an anomalous scatterer in a crystal to calculate phases. A recent study by Panneerselvam et al. emphasized the utility of cadmium ions for SAD phasing at the standard synchrotron wavelength of 1 Å. Here we show that cadmium is also useful for phasing of crystals collected in-house with CuKα radiation. Using a crystal of single-domain antibody as an experimental model, we demonstrate how cadmium SAD can be conveniently employed to solve a CuKα dataset. We then discuss the factors which make this method generally applicable.

Keywords

Protein crystallography, experimental phasing, single-wavelength anomalous diffraction, cadmium ions, Cd-SAD

Introduction

Elucidation of atomic structures of macromolecules by X-ray crystallography requires knowledge of the phases of measured reflections. Nowadays this phase problem is most often solved by molecular replacement (MR), a computational technique which utilizes the known structure of a homologous molecule to estimate phases. However, in the case of de novo structure elucidation when an appropriate homologous structure is unavailable, phases should be determined experimentally. This is predominantly achieved by analyzing anomalous scattering produced either by atoms naturally occurring in the molecule, or intentionally introduced into crystal during growth or soaking. The two phasing methods exploiting the anomalous scattering, multiwavelength anomalous diffraction (MAD) and single-wavelength anomalous diffraction (SAD), were reviewed by Hendrickson1. Synchrotron radiation with tunable wavelength allows achieving the absorption edges of all elements with Z≥20 to maximize anomalous signal, thus making these methods remarkably versatile.

On the contrary, the choice of anomalous scatterer is minimal when data are to be collected in-house using a laboratory X-ray generator, most often equipped with a copper anode (λ=1.5418 Å, CuKα). Indeed, in some cases, even weak anomalous signal of sulfur (f′′=0.56e- at CuKα) can be used for phasing, as demonstrated in pioneering SAD work on crambin2. Similarly, zinc (f′′=0.68e- at CuKα) was proposed to be useful for in-house SAD experiments3. Perhaps the most impressive result came from the structural genomics project, where iodine ion soaks were systematically used for de novo SAD phasing of datasets collected with CuKα radiation4. Iodine has a strong anomalous scattering (f′′=6.9e- at CuKα), high solubility, and binds multiple hydrophobic sites or positively charged residues on protein surface. Iodine SAD appeared remarkably efficient for phasing the crystals of membrane proteins which possess patches of positively charged residues at the hydrophobic-hydrophilic interface, providing many binding sites for anions5.

Another attractive opportunity is to use cadmium ions, which have a great anomalous signal (f′′=4.7e- at CuKα) comparable to that of iodine, promote crystal growth6, and can substitute other divalent cations in metal-binding proteins. Despite all these advantages and its use in the very early SAD works7, Cd is rarely used in the phasing of protein crystals. Recently, a paper emphasizing the utility of cadmium ions for experimental phasing at the standard synchrotron wavelength of 1 Å was published8. In this short research note, we show how Cd-SAD can also be conveniently used for phasing datasets collected using CuKα radiation.

Methods

As an experimental model for in-house cadmium SAD, we used a crystal of an anti-ErbB3 single-domain antibody BCD090-M2, which we recently studied9. The details of protein purification, characterization, and structural analysis are given in the paper9. Briefly, the protein was expressed in E. coli SHuffle cells as a SUMO fusion, purified by immobilized metal affinity chromatography, cleaved by TEV protease, and then polished by an additional step of high-resolution cation-exchange chromatography. The antibody was crystallized by hanging-drop vapor diffusion in two different forms: in a space group C2 without divalent cations (PDB accession number: 6EZW) and in P1 with two cadmium ions per unit cell (PDB accession number: 6F0D)9. Crystals of both types diffracted below 2 Å. The data were collected on a Kappa Apex II diffractometer (Bruker AXS) using CuKα radiation generated by a IμS microfocus X-ray tube. Both structures were solved by molecular replacement in Phenix software suite v. 1.1110. The dataset with cadmium (6F0D) with unmerged Friedel pairs was used for SAD analysis. For experimental phasing, we used a standard protocol employing SHELXC/D/E programs11 through HKL2MAP v. 0.4 graphical interface12. Data were processed with SHELXC v. 2016/1, anomalous substructure was solved by SHELXD v. 2013/2 and phasing and density modification were done by SHELXE v. 2018/2. The automatic model building and refinement were done in Phenix v. 1.1410, and manual refinement was done in Coot v. 0.8.9.113. Figures were prepared with PyMOL.

Results and discussion

The phasing of protein crystals by SAD starts from finding the positions of an anomalous substructure, which is usually done by direct methods. First, the dataset was processed with SHELXC, and the statistical analysis of the anomalous signal is shown in Figure 1A and Table 1. The use of kappa goniometer for data collection allowed achieving high completeness (96.4%) and multiplicity (5.9) of anomalous pair measurements. The signal-to-noise ratio defined as ⟨d′′/σ(d′′)⟩ and the correlation coefficient CC1/2 indicate that useful anomalous signal is present almost in the whole resolution range. For further substructure solution, we implied a rather conservative high-resolution cut-off of 2.4 Å corresponding to CC1/2 (anom.) ~ 0.3.

7cdace7a-d4b2-4d3f-89f6-0e38051ceb80_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Cadmium SAD phasing of the dataset collected at CuKα wavelength.

The crystal of the single-domain antibody BCD090-M2 with cadmium ions was used as an experimental model for in-house Cd-SAD. (A) Strength of the anomalous signal represented by ⟨d′′/σ(d′′)⟩ and CC1/2 as a function of resolution. (B) Electron density modification in SHELXE as monitored by an increase in map contrast; solutions with original and inverted anomalous substructure give indistinguishable contrast due to centrosymmetry. (C) Cadmium ion binding site. (D) Schematic representation of the crystal unit cell.

Table 1. Cadmium SAD phasing and model building results.

Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell.

ParameterValue
Dataset statistics (6F0D)
  Space groupP1
  Unit cell: a b c (Å) α β γ (◦)35.77 41.53 46.49 89.99 67.92 76.06
  Resolution range, Å32.34–1.90 (1.94–1.90)
  Reflections: total / unique246903 (6236) / 18859 (1265)
  Completeness (all), %100.0 (100.0)
  Completeness (anom.), %96.4 (89.9)
  Multiplicity13.1 (4.9)
  Multiplicity (anom.)5.9 (2.4)
  Mean I/σ(I)14.9 (2.2)
SHELXD
  Resolution range, Å32.34–2.4
  CFOM55.61
  CCall/CCweak32.40 / 23.21
  No. of sites2/2
SHELXE
  No. of residues built222 / 256 (87%)
  CC43.57
phenix.autobuild
  No. of residues built245 / 256 (96%)
  CC0.80
Refinement
  No. of residues built256/256 (100%)
  CC0.90
  Rwork / Rfree, %17.8 / 21.0

CFOM, combined figure of merit; CC, correlation coefficient.

The anomalous substructure was immediately solved by SHELXD as judged by high correlation coefficients (combined figure of merit = 55.6%), high occupancies of the two cadmium sites (1.00, 0.99), and the rapid drop in occupancy of the next site (0.17). The positions of Cd ions corresponded to the largest off-origin peak of the anomalous Patterson function at (0.58, 0.02, 0.03). The solution was used in SHELXE for phasing, electron density modification, and chain tracing. This yielded electron density maps with high contrast, and the solutions for original and inverted substructure were indistinguishable due to centrosymmetry (Figure 1B). As discussed previously14, centrosymmetric anomalous sites in SAD can impede interpretation of electron density maps, because the resulting map is a superposition of the true electron density with its negative mirror-image. However, in our case the major portion of the protein chain (87%) was traced after density modification. This incomplete model was further improved in phenix.autobuild, and then refined manually in Coot and phenix.refine giving final Rwork/Rfree of 17.8/21.0%.

In this particular case, structure determination by in-house Cd-SAD was almost as straightforward as an automated molecular replacement. The causes of this simplicity were the relatively small protein size, high completeness and multiplicity of the anomalous data, and the small number of high-occupancy cadmium sites. Furthermore, the recent theoretical study gives the following simple dependency for expected anomalous signal ⟨Sano⟩ ~ (Nrefl/nsites)1/2, where Nrefl is the number of independent reflections and nsites is the number of anomalous scatterers15. Our case with maximum Nrefl due to the lowest symmetry (P1) and only 2 anomalous sites appears virtually optimal for SAD. The high metal-binding affinity of cadmium sites was achieved through coordination with carbonyl oxygen of Glu114, and carboxylic groups of Asp100 and Asp116 (Figure 1C). By bridging these residues to the N-terminal Gly residue of the neighboring molecule, cadmium ions effectively defined crystal contacts (Figure 1D). Data associated with this study are available on OSF16.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we suggest that cadmium SAD can be generally applied for the phasing of protein crystals collected in-house using CuKα radiation. We see the following advantages of this approach: (1) cadmium has a great anomalous signal (f′′=4.7e- at CuKα); (2) cadmium ions frequently promote crystal growth and can substitute other divalent cations; (3) cadmium binding sites are complementary to that of iodine, another strong anomalous scatterer, and therefore Cd-SAD can be useful in cases where I-SAD does not work.

Data availability

Data for this study, including unmerged experimental intensities, structure factors and final atomic coordinates after refinement, are available on OSF. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/KYH6D16.

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 21 Jan 2019
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Eliseev IE, Yudenko AN, Ukrainskaya VM and Chakchir OB. Cadmium SAD phasing at CuKα wavelength [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2019, 8:84 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17694.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 21 Jan 2019
Views
4
Cite
Reviewer Report 01 Apr 2019
Igor Melnikov, European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF), Grenoble, France 
Approved
VIEWS 4
In this experiment report the authors present their work on derivatising crystals of a single-domain antibody protein with cadmium ions and subsequent solving the structure via SAD. They demonstrate that home-lab X-ray crystallographic equipment is capable of solving crystal structures via ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Melnikov I. Reviewer Report For: Cadmium SAD phasing at CuKα wavelength [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2019, 8:84 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.19346.r45676)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
12
Cite
Reviewer Report 18 Feb 2019
Thomas E. Edwards, Bainbridge Island, Bainbridge Island, WA, 98110, USA 
Approved
VIEWS 12
Eliseev et al. demonstrate the ability to use cadmium divalent cations, X-ray data collected on an in house X-ray source (Cu Kalpha), and single wavelength anomalous dispersion (SAD) phasing to determine the structure of a protein, in this case the anti-ErbB3 ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Edwards TE. Reviewer Report For: Cadmium SAD phasing at CuKα wavelength [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2019, 8:84 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.19346.r43346)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 21 Jan 2019
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.