Keywords
endocarditis, stents, infection, coronary aneurysm, acute coronary syndrome
endocarditis, stents, infection, coronary aneurysm, acute coronary syndrome
Infectious complications following percutaneous cardiac interventions are known but not very common. Coronary stent implantation is associated with complications, though rare, such as stent infection or coronary aneurysms resulting from several mechanisms, and needing special investigations for their diagnosis and management1,2. Simultaneous occurrence of coronary stent infection and mycotic aneurysm has been described in a few cases as an unusual life-threatening complication following coronary angioplasty3. The majority of the few reported cases had an unfavorable outcome4, with the majority treated surgically.
We report a rare case of ST elevation myocardial infarction due to bare metal stent infection and coronary artery aneurysm in the setting of tricuspid valve infective endocarditis. The management and outcome of our patient was quite different from what was reported in the literature.
It is important for the interventional cardiologist, to remember that such complication might occur and should be prevented. If it does occur however, its treatment and outcome represent a challenge for clinicians.
A 71-year-old North African retired male patient with a history of smoking (40 pack-years) and no known medical or surgical history, was referred to our center in October 2017, from the emergency department, for inferior ST elevation myocardial infarction with complete atrioventricular block. He underwent a successful primary angioplasty of the right coronary artery (RCA) with a bare metal stent (Figure 1). A temporary cardiac pacing via the right femoral vein was performed for 24 hours and the patient was discharged at day 5. Initial and controlled laboratory tests during hospitalization were normal except elevated troponin at admission. One week later, the patient was referred again to our center from the emergency department for persistent chest pain with a new right bundle branch block. An urgent coronary angiogram showed a thrombus with an aneurysm on the distal part of the RCA stent and a Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 3 flow (normal flow) (Figure 2A and 2B). An additional angioplasty using a second bare metal stent overlapping with the previous one was successfully performed with exclusion of the aneurysm and disappearance of the thrombus. (Figure 2B and 2C). The initial physical exam in the coronary care unit immediately after angioplasty found a mild fever at 38°C with a systolic tricuspid regurgitation murmur. Echocardiography showed vegetation (17 × 14 mm) at the level of the tricuspid valve with a moderate tricuspid regurgitation and a moderate pericardial effusion (Figure 3A and 3B). Transesophageal echocardiography confirmed the same findings and ruled out a patent foramen ovale or any involvement of the other valves. Laboratory tests (which were normal at the previous admission) showed a marked elevation of white blood cells count (24,000 E/mm3, normal value < 11,800 E/mm3), C reactive protein (186 mg/L, normal value < 6 mg/L), and liver enzymes (Alanine transaminase (ALT) at 215 IU/L and Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) at 165 IU/L, normal value respectively < 35 IU/L and < 40 IU/L) associated with acute renal failure (serum creatinine at 148 mmol/L, normal value < 105 mmol/L) and hemolytic anemia (Hemoglobin 8 g/DL, normal value > 13 g/DL). Blood cultures were positive to negative coagulase Staphylococcus. The diagnosis of infective endocarditis of the tricuspid valve with RCA mycoticaneurysm at the site of stent implantation was strongly suspected. Cardiac CT scan confirmed the vegetation in the right ventricle with hematoma around the RCA and pericardial effusion (Figure 3C). It also showed a mycotic aneurysm of the RCA which was excluded by the overlapping stent (Figure 3D). Following a thorough search for the underlying cause, we concluded that the temporary cardiac pacing was the most likely origin of the tricuspid valve infective endocarditis. Antibiotic therapy (vancomycin 30 mg/Kg/day i.v. in 2 doses, rifampicin 900 mg orally in 3 divided doses and gentamycin 3 mg/Kg i.v once daily) was provided resulting in total regression of the infection symptoms, the tricuspid vegetation and the pericardial effusion. The patient was discharged from the hospital after six weeks of antibiotic therapy. The patient has completed one-year of follow-up with repeated echocardiography and blood tests, all of which were ordinary.
Coronary angiogram images before (A) and after (B) the first primary angioplasty of the right coronary artery.
Coronary angiogram images of the second primary angioplasty: A and B show the intrastent thrombus with mycotic aneurysm of the right coronary artery. C and D show the right coronary artery angioplasty with an overlapping bare metal stent.
Imaging showing tricuspid valve vegetation (arrow) with hematoma around the right coronary artery (arrowhead) and pericardial effusion in transthoracic echocardiography (A and B) and cardiac computed tomography scan (C). D: computed tomography coronary angiography showing the right coronary artery aneurysm excluded by the overlapping stent.
Stent infection can occur early (less than 10 days) or late (10 days or longer) following coronary angioplasty4 and is frequently diagnosed in the context of an acute coronary syndrome due to stent thrombosis or coronary artery aneurysm. The diagnosis of coronary stent infection is confirmed based on the criteria proposed by Dieter1. The diagnosis is definitive when confirmed by autopsy or surgical material examination if at least three of the following criteria are present: coronary stent implantation during the last 4 weeks; repeated interventions through the same arterial sheath; fever > 38°C, documented bacteremia, leukocytosis without evident etiology; acute coronary syndrome; or positive cardiac imaging. Mycotic coronary aneurysms may result from different mechanisms including direct bacterial invasion in the setting of infective endocarditis, injury caused by immune complexes, arterial trauma and vasa vasorum embolic occlusion. Other mechanisms such as immuno-compromised status and congenital cardiovascular defects might be involved2. Following testing for all these mechanisms in our patient we strongly suspected the infective endocarditis as the main etiology of the right coronary stent mycotic aneurysm. The majority of the similar reported cases were associated with a fatal outcome4. In few cases, like in ours, peri-coronary hematoma with pericardial effusion can be present and it may be due to the coronary aneurysm leak or rupture5. Irrespective of time of presentation, the majority of stent infection with coronary aneurysm must be treated by surgical extraction of the stent with aneurysm repair when indicated and with simultaneous intravenous antibiotic therapy for at least 4 weeks6. In our case, the follow up at 1 year didn’t show any signs of relapse. Consequently, the patient was not referred to surgery.
One limitation of this report relates to the mycotic nature of the stent aneurysm which can only be confirmed by tissue analysis. This was not possible since the patient did not have surgery nor a postmortem autopsy. However, the diagnosis was highly probable based on the clinical, biological and imaging parameters.
In conclusion, coronary stent infection in the setting of infective endocarditis is rare but must be considered whenever a patient develops fever and chest pain after stent implantation. Treatment modalities tend to favor surgery, but in our case, we showed that coronary angioplasty and prolonged antibiotic therapy may be sufficient. To prevent such complications, adherence to aseptic precautions and treatment of pre-existing infections are of paramount importance.
Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details and/or clinical images was obtained from the patient/parent/guardian/relative of the patient.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?
Yes
Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?
Yes
Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?
Yes
Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Interventional cardiology
Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?
Yes
Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?
Yes
Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?
Yes
Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: interventional cardiology
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 12 Jun 19 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)