Keywords
HIV, Index Testing, Services, Lusaka
HIV, Index Testing, Services, Lusaka
According to the 2018 UNAIDS Global AIDS Update1, there are an estimated 36.9 million people living with HIV (PLHIV). Recently, marked progress on HIV test and treat strategy has been achieved by countries’ commitment to achieve the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets by 20201. As of December 2017, three out of every four PLHIV knew their HIV status globally; 90% of HIV-infected individuals are expected to know their HIV status by 20201.
According to the ZAMPHIA 2016 fact sheet2, only 67.3% of PLHIV (ages 15 – 49) knew their HIV status. In 2017, Zambia had 1.1 million PLHIV and 48,000 new HIV infections3. Without HIV testing services interventions targeted to key populations, including sexual partners of index clients infected with HIV, it will be hard to end the HIV epidemic by 20304.
The cornerstone for achieving the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets by 2020 begins with PLHIV knowing their status. As the proportions of those living with HIV who do not know their HIV infection status decrease, reaching the remaining few who are asymptomatic and not in contact with the health care system becomes a critical challenge. Therefore, reaching the first 90 goal will require effective and efficient HIV testing approaches. The number of PLHIV who know their HIV status and who receive antiretroviral therapy (ART) could increase by the expansion of index testing services. This will result in the reduction of the number of people who can transmit the virus, and subsequently in reduced new HIV infections.
The aim of this study was to review existing medical records in Zambia in order to present existing information on index testing and propose better ways to improve HIV index testing services.
This was a retrospective study looking at index registers of clients who tested HIV positive and were elicited for index testing between October and December 2019. The study was conducted between January and February 2020 in three high volume health facilities in Matero sub-district 3 of Lusaka district in Zambia. The study facilities included Matero First Level Hospital, Matero Main Clinic, and George Health Centre. The overview results of the study, which looked at the effectiveness of HIV index testing, were described. The analysis examined index clients’ identification, elicitations of index contacts, and testing of index contacts. The main quantitative outcome of interest for this analysis was the success of index testing to improve yield for HIV Testing Services (HTS) among female and male, and across ages among index clients; and secondly ART initiation for positive index contacts.
This retrospective phase of our study used a total sample enumeration technique.
The study population comprised all index clients (men and women at the study facilities) who had been diagnosed with HIV and were elicited for HIV index contact testing during the study period.
Inclusion criteria:
HIV positive clients (index clients or index cases) and their sexual contacts (sexual partners of index clients who have been elicited and offered HIV index testing services). The study participants included:
HIV positive clients identified through either voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) or provider-initiated counseling and testing (PICT)
Being documented in HIV index registers
Having elicited at least one sexual partner
Exclusion criteria:
Data on the index clients (cases) characteristics (age, gender, contacts, ART status), and the contacts’ HIV test outcome (yield, initiation status) were extracted from the HIV index testing registers into a structured pro forma.
Data entry and analysis was performed using Statistics Package for Social Science software (SPSS version 16.0). Descriptive statistics were performed to describe the background characteristics of index clients and successful testing of index contacts. Analysis entailed simple frequencies of the main study outcomes and cross-tabulations. The association of index contacts’ gender with the HIV test outcome of the index contacts was examined using the Chi Square test.
Ethical clearance was sought and obtained from the ERES Converge Zambian Institutional Review Board (IRB) (approval number: Ref. No. 2019-Nov-009), and authority to conduct research was obtained from the National Health Research Authority (approved on 29th January 2020) before the commencement of the study. Informed written consent for this study was waived by the IRB and National Health Research Authority due to the retrospective nature of the study. Index testing services are offered as part of the recommended national HIV testing services. Clients’ confidentiality was observed by assigning a serial number to each participant that was known only to the health care provider. Only the client’s initials and serial number appeared on the data collection forms.
The total number of index clients included in the study was 604. Matero First Level Hospital leads the participation per facility with 292 participants, followed by George Health Centre and Matero Main Clinic with 164 and 148 participants, respectively. The total number of female participants was 314 (representing 52%) and male participants was 290 (representing 48%) (Table 1).
The age of participating index clients ranged from 16 to 78 years, with mean age calculated at 34 years (SD = 9.1). Out of the total number of 604 participants, 514 clients (85.1%) were married, 85 clients (14.1%) were unmarried, 3 clients were widowed, and 2 clients were divorced.
Concerning the time spent from HIV test to the initiation of ART for index cases: 595 index clients started ART within 7 days (98.5%), 1 index client started ART within a month (0.2%), 1 index client started ART after 1 month (0.2%), and there was no evidence of starting ART for 7 clients (1.2%).
The number of contacts elicited per index client were as follows: 413 clients (68.4%) elicited 1 sexual contact each, 146 clients (24.2%) elicited 2 sexual contacts each, 40 clients (6.6%) elicited 3 sexual contacts each, and 5 clients (0.8%) elicited 4 sexual contacts each (Table 2).
The mean age of elicited contacts was calculated at 33 years (range, 17–80 years SD = 9.4). From the total number of 845 elicited contacts, 604 contacts were main partners of index cases, 238 contacts were additional partners of index cases, and 3 contacts were casual.
The time spent from elicitation to HIV testing of index contacts varied across participants: 294 index contacts were tested within 7 days (34.8%), 76 index contacts were tested within 14 days (9%), 77 index contacts were tested within a month (9.1%), 133 index contacts were tested after 1 month (15.7%), and 265 index contacts were not yet tested (31.4%).
The HIV test outcomes for index contacts were as follows: 452 index contacts (53.5%) tested HIV negative, 113 index contacts (13.4%) tested HIV positive, 108 index contacts (12.8%) were known HIV positive, and 172 index contacts (20.4%) were not yet tested for HIV. Of the 113 contacts who tested HIV positive, 90 index contacts started ART within 7 days (79.6%). There was no documented evidence of starting ART for 23 HIV positive contacts (20.4%).
The total number of 565 index contacts were tested for HIV and 172 index contacts had not yet been tested for HIV (Table 3). The Pearson Chi-Square test value was calculated at 0.498 and the p value was 0.481.
Most index clients (98.5%) had documented evidence of starting ART within 7 days of HIV diagnosis. This demonstrates strongly that the test and start strategy is being implemented to scale in Matero urban sub-district of Lusaka. There was an elicitation of 845 contacts out of 604 cases, giving us a low elicitation ratio of 1:1.4. There was not much difference between gender for elicited contacts (423 males and 422 females).
A total number of 565 index contacts were eligible for HIV test. 113 of them tested HIV positive, representing a positivity yield of 20%. This index testing positivity yield is below the expected yield of above 25% as reported by several other studies5–13. The current linkage rate for positive contacts is 79.6%.
The calculated Chi-Square test value is 0.498 and the p value is 0.481. This result is not significant since p value (0.481) is greater than the designated alpha level (0.05), so we’d accept the null hypothesis that asserts the two variables are independent of each other. Therefore, there is no association between the gender of the contact and their HIV testing status.
HIV index testing services are an effective way for improved HIV case identification. It has yielded a positivity rate of 20% in Matero Urban area of Lusaka. Our recommendation is that HIV programs need to explore and address barriers to HIV partner testing services to maximize HIV case finding.
Harvard Dataverse: Cibangu, Katamba, 2020, “Replication Data for: , “HIV INDEX TESTING SERVICES IN URBAN LUSAKA: a review of medical records”, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/QOQM3K14.
Harvard Dataverse: Replication Data for: HIV index testing services in urban Lusaka: a review of medical records, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/FSHCQ615.
This project contains the following underlying data:
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).
I would like to acknowledge the Lusaka Provincial Health Office (LPHO) management, the Lusaka District Health Office leadership, the Matero Health Management team for their guidance and support, and PEPFAR through the LPHO/CDC CoAg during this study. I am also grateful to Dr. Monde Muyoyeta for her supervisory support.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
No
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
No
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
No
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: HIV, MNCH, GBV, Health Emergencies
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
No
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Medical Education, HIV and pediatric HIV, Pediatric Allergy
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |
Version 3 (revision) 24 Mar 22 |
read | ||
Version 2 (revision) 12 Nov 21 |
read | read | |
Version 1 30 Sep 20 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)