ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article
Revised

Effect of different biofloc starters on ammonia, nitrate, and nitrite concentrations in the cultured tilapia Oreochromis niloticus system

[version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
PUBLISHED 02 Jun 2020
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Agriculture, Food and Nutrition gateway.

Abstract

Background: High stocking density and intensive feeding in aquaculture systems lead to the accumulation of organic waste, which results in an increase in ammonia, nitrite, and nitrite concentrations in culture media. Biofloc is a potential technology to overcome this problem. The starter is a crucial carbon source for bacteria in the formation of biofloc. The objective of the present study aimed to explore the best starter of biofloc in a red tilapia Oreochromis niloticus culture system.
Methods: A completely randomized design with four levels of treatment was used in this study. The tested starter was (A) control treatment, biofloc without starter, (B) biofloc with molasses starter, (C) biofloc with tapioca starter, and (D) biofloc with sucrose starter. The floc was cultured in 100-L tanks with a salinity of 17 ppt. The tanks were stocked with O. niloticus with a size of 3.71±0.11 cm at a stocking density of 30 fish per tank. The fish were fed on a commercial diet two times a day at satiation for 40 days. The ammonia, nitrite, and nitrite concentrations were measured for an interval of 8 days.
Results: The study showed that the NH3-N range was 0.02–0.07 mg L−1 (mean, 0.03 ± 0.02 mg L−1), NO2-N range was 0.20–0.43 mg L−1 (mean, 0.25 ± 0.12 mg L−1), and NO3-N range was 0.90–3.20 mg L−1 (mean, 1.42 ± 1.19 mg L−1).
Conclusion: Among the starters tested, molasses was found to be the best for biofloc in tilapia culture.

Keywords

Biofloc, Carbon, Molasses, Water Quality

Revised Amendments from Version 2

In the introduction, we corrected MS articles according to the reviewers' suggestions; the statement "no information" was replaced by "limited information".

See the authors' detailed response to the review by Christopher Marlowe Caipang

Introduction

Water quality is a crucial factor in aquaculture systems. One important water quality parameter is nitrogen. In water, nitrogen can be found in the forms of ammonia, nitrite, and nitrate1–5. Ammonia (NH3-N) is produced from the breakdown of proteins from unconsumed feed, feces, and urine of fish. This compound will turn into nitrite (NO2) when oxygen levels are poor6, which is toxic for fish7. By contrast, ammonia is changed into nitrate when the dissolved oxygen level is sufficient8,9. Fish produces ammonia (inorganic N) through the osmoregulation process; feces and urine contribute about 10%–20% of total nitrogen10. The application of biofloc is one of the alternatives to overcome water quality problems especially in controlling total ammonia nitrogen in the aquaculture system11–13.

Biofloc refers to the use of heterotrophs and autotrophs, which can convert organic waste into floc forms that can be utilized by fish as a food source4,11,14–16. Biofloc technology is cheap, simple, and environmentally friendly13,17. Several organisms, such as bacteria, plankton, fungi, and algae, and suspended particles exist in flocs18,19. These organisms provide nutrition for cultured fish. However, the formation of biofloc needs a starter consisting of probiotics and a carbon source. Molasses, tapioca, and wheat flours are common starters in biofloc culture (African catfish, Nile tilapia, Litopenaeus vannamei)16,19–23. Presently, limited information is available on the best starter for biofloc in the cultured system of red tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Thus, the present study aimed to explore the best starter for biofloc in a red tilapia O. niloticus culture system.

Methods

Time and site

The research was carried out for 40 days from February 2019 to March 2019 at the Aquaculture Technology Laboratory, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine, Riau University, Indonesia. The experiments were carried out within the ethical guidelines in animal research developed by NC3Rs. In Indonesia, no approval is required to conduct research on fish.

Experimental design

A completely randomized design with four levels of treatment and three replications was performed in this study; the tested treatment was four starters of biofloc, namely control without a starter (treatment A), biofloc with molasses starter concentration 0.48 gL−1 (treatment B), biofloc with tapioca starter concentration 0.35 gL−1 (treatment C), and biofloc with sucrose concentration 0.42 gL−1 (treatment D).

The amount of carbon added is calculated based on the carbon content (C) in the ingredients and the nitrogen content in the feed given5 using the formula:

C/N = (% C starter x molecule weight of starter + % C feed x feed weight)/ % N feed x feed weight. Based on this formula, to obtain a C/N ratio of 20: 1, a carbon source derived from molasses was 48 g with a C content of 37%24, tapioca flour as much as 35 g with a C content of 50.3%25, and sucrose 42 g with a C content of 42.3%26.

Biofloc culture

Biofloc was cultured using 0.01 ml/L probiotic bacteria from Boster Multisel (Bacillus sp.)16, and the carbon source was from starters based on the tested treatments with the C/N ratio of 20:1. The starter was applied in cultivation media and probiotic bacteria administration. Probiotics and starter were applied into cultivation cultured media and left for 1 week, and the media were aerated continuously. The starters were added every week for maintaining the floc. Floc formation was indicated by green water and foam forming in the media.

The number of fish used in this study was 360 individuals and they were obtained from a hatchery in the Bengkalis Regency, Riau. The fish were 50 days old, 3.71±0.11 cm TL. As the sex of the fish cannot be identified morphologically, there is no separation of fish sex in this study. The fish was distributed into research tanks as the flocs are formed, 7 days after the starter was cultured in the tanks (total 12 tanks, 100L volume). The density of the fish was 30 fishes/100 L. Stocking of red tilapia larvae in the morning at 8 AM with a water temperature of 25°C The fish were fed on commercial diet containing 38% crude protein, 5% crude lipid, and 6% crude fiber (PF1000, PT Matahari Sakti). Feeding was conducted ad libitum/satiation, 2 times/day (8 AM and 5 PM) for 40 days.

Measurement of nitrogen content

The ammonia (NH3), nitrite (NO2−), and nitrate (NO3+) contents were measured by spectrophotometry. These parameters were measured every 8 days in each treatment for 40 days. Ammonia (NH3), Nitrite (NO2−) and Nitrate (NO3+) were measured using spectrophotometer (Optima - SP300) at a wavelength of 630 nm27. The measurement was conducted at 8:00 AM with three replications at 8-day intervals over 40 days (six timepoints).

Statistical analysis

The data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance followed by the post hoc Newman–Keuls test using SPSS 18.0 software. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Over the six timepoints measured, the mean concentration of ammonia ranged from 0.02 mg L−1 to 0.07 mg L−1 (with an average value of 0.03 ± 0.02 mg L−1), nitrite ranged from 0.20 mg L−1 to 0.43 mg L−1 (with an average value of 0.25 ± 0.12 mg L−1), and nitrate ranged from 0.64 mgL−1 to 3.20 mgL−1 (with an average value of 1.42 ± 1.19 mg L−1). The study revealed that the best concentrations of ammonia, nitrite, and nitrate were recorded in the biofloc starter of molasses. These values did not significantly differ from those obtained with the tapioca and sucrose starters, but they were significantly different from the control treatment without a starter (Table 1). Raw values for each replicate are available as Underlying data28.

Table 1. Average values of ammonia nitrogen, nitrite, nitrate, turbidity, and carbon dioxide concentrations based on treatment.

Data values are the mean and standard deviation. Mean values with different superscripts in the same row were significantly different (p < 0.05).

ParameterUnitTreatment
Control (A)Molasses (B)Tapioca (C)Sucrose (D)
NH3-NmgL−10.07 ± 0.05b0.02 ± 0.01a0.02 ± 0.01a0.02 ± 0.01a
NO2-NmgL−10.43 ± 0.25b0.14 ± 0.09a0.20 ± 0.12a0.24 ± 0.14a
NO3-NmgL−13.54 ± 3.21b0.64 ± 0.46a0.90 ± 0.96a0.93 ± 1.12a

In the control treatment, the concentrations of ammonia, nitrite, and nitrate increased gradually with increasing experimental time. However, in the starter treatments, the ammonia concentration dropped during the first week of the experiment (day 8), became stagnant during the second and third weeks (day 16 to day 24), and increased again at day 32 of the experiment. However, the ammonia concentration decreased sharply at day 40 (Figure 1a). The nitrite concentration also decreased during the first week but increased slightly at day 16 and increased gradually until day 40 in treatments C (tapioca) and D (sucrose). By contrast, the nitrite concentration decreased at day 24, increased at day 32, and decreased at day 40 (Figure 1b). The nitrate concentration was relatively stagnant from day 1 to day 8. The nitrate concentration fluctuated during the experiment (Figure 1c). In general, the molasses starter (treatment B) yielded slightly better results than the other starters, but no significant different was found between the treatments except the control. The data of the growth performance of the red tilapia fish O. niloticus has been published separately29.

47754f8e-c844-4e4c-8229-1904929d97df_figure1.gif

Figure 1.

(a) Concentrations of ammonia, (b) nitrate, and (c) nitrate during 40 days of the experiment. A = control treatment, B = molasses starter, C = tapioca starter, and D = sucrose starter.

Discussion

The study revealed that the concentrations of ammonia, nitrite, and nitrate were significantly lower in the biofloc system using starters compared with those in the system without a starter (control). Biofloc has probiotic bacteria that can change ammonia to nontoxic materials (such as nitrate) that are useful for phytoplankton growth. Therefore, the ammonia and nitrate concentrations are low in the culture media19,21,30. Biofloc does not necessarily only contain bacteria (for example, Bacillus), but is also composed of other useful microorganisms such as microalgae and zooplankton that are trapped by organic particles31. Algae and zooplankton can be used by cultured biota (tilapia) as natural food.

In general, the starters used in this study were carbohydrate compounds. However, the study showed that the molasses starter yielded slightly better results compared with the other starters. This finding indicated that molasses was the best carbon source for biofloc in the tilapia culture system. Molasses can provide a sufficient carbon level for heterotrophic bacteria that use this carbon as an energy source for growth6,19,21,23,32. Molasses are a liquid byproduct from the sugar industry. This material has a total carbon content of around 37%24. Therefore, molasses are rapidly soluble in water and can be quickly absorbed by heterotrophic bacteria3. In terms of chemical structure, molasses are classified as a simple carbohydrate containing six C atoms (monosaccharides), while sucrose (treatment D) is a combination of two monosaccharides that contain 12 C atoms (sucrose). Tapioca is classified as a complex carbohydrate (60,000 C atoms) and is more slowly digested by bacteria than molasses25,33.

Conclusion

Carbon source from molasses is effective in reducing concentrations of ammonia, nitrite, and nitrate in red tilapia culture with biofloc technology.

Data availability

Underlying data

Figshare: Effect of different biofloc starters on ammonia, nitrate, and nitrite concentrations in the cultured tilapia Oreochromis niloticus system. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1202795128.

This project contains raw data for the concentration of ammonia, nitrate and nitrite in each tank at each timepoint.

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 3
VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 24 Apr 2020
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Putra I, Effendi I, Lukistyowati I et al. Effect of different biofloc starters on ammonia, nitrate, and nitrite concentrations in the cultured tilapia Oreochromis niloticus system [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2020, 9:293 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.22977.3)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 3
VERSION 3
PUBLISHED 02 Jun 2020
Revised
Views
7
Cite
Reviewer Report 03 Jun 2020
Muhammad Rizal Razman, Research Centre for Sustainability Science and Governance (SGK), Institute for Environment and Development (LESTARI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi, Malaysia 
Approved
VIEWS 7
The paper has been ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Razman MR. Reviewer Report For: Effect of different biofloc starters on ammonia, nitrate, and nitrite concentrations in the cultured tilapia Oreochromis niloticus system [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2020, 9:293 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.27000.r64225)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
8
Cite
Reviewer Report 03 Jun 2020
Christopher Marlowe Caipang, University of San Agustin, Iloilo City, Philippines 
Approved
VIEWS 8
The authors have addressed the ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Caipang CM. Reviewer Report For: Effect of different biofloc starters on ammonia, nitrate, and nitrite concentrations in the cultured tilapia Oreochromis niloticus system [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2020, 9:293 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.27000.r64226)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Version 2
VERSION 2
PUBLISHED 13 May 2020
Revised
Views
12
Cite
Reviewer Report 20 May 2020
Christopher Marlowe Caipang, University of San Agustin, Iloilo City, Philippines 
Approved
VIEWS 12
The authors have addressed the issues and suggestions in the earlier draft. However, I have notice that the statement in the revised version "Presently, no information is available on the best starter for biofloc in the cultured system of Nile ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Caipang CM. Reviewer Report For: Effect of different biofloc starters on ammonia, nitrate, and nitrite concentrations in the cultured tilapia Oreochromis niloticus system [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2020, 9:293 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.26350.r63360)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 23 Jun 2020
    Iskandar Putra, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, 28000, Indonesia
    23 Jun 2020
    Author Response
    Inquiry 
    Presently, no information is available on the best starter for biofloc in the cultured system of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus.

    Respond
    limited information is available on the best starter ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 23 Jun 2020
    Iskandar Putra, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, 28000, Indonesia
    23 Jun 2020
    Author Response
    Inquiry 
    Presently, no information is available on the best starter for biofloc in the cultured system of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus.

    Respond
    limited information is available on the best starter ... Continue reading
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 24 Apr 2020
Views
17
Cite
Reviewer Report 11 May 2020
Muhammad Rizal Razman, Research Centre for Sustainability Science and Governance (SGK), Institute for Environment and Development (LESTARI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi, Malaysia 
Approved
VIEWS 17
  1. The work was clearly and accurately presented. 
     
  2. The work has cited the current literature, (36 %) of (2015-2020).
     
  3. The study design was appropriate and  the work  was technically sound.
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Razman MR. Reviewer Report For: Effect of different biofloc starters on ammonia, nitrate, and nitrite concentrations in the cultured tilapia Oreochromis niloticus system [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2020, 9:293 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.25366.r62751)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
30
Cite
Reviewer Report 01 May 2020
Christopher Marlowe Caipang, University of San Agustin, Iloilo City, Philippines 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 30
Summary: This ms aimed to determine  the best starter of biofloc in a red tilapia Oreochromis niloticus culture system. Three biofloc starters (molasses, tapioca and sucrose) and control were tested in triplicate over a period of 40 days. Nitrate, nitrite and ammonia were ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Caipang CM. Reviewer Report For: Effect of different biofloc starters on ammonia, nitrate, and nitrite concentrations in the cultured tilapia Oreochromis niloticus system [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2020, 9:293 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.25366.r62750)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 13 May 2020
    Iskandar Putra, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, 28000, Indonesia
    13 May 2020
    Author Response
    1. Inquiry 
    Change the title to: Effect of different biofloc starters on ammonia, nitrate, and nitrite concentrations in the culture of tilapia Oreochromis niloticus.

    Response: Thank you for your suggestion. I have ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 13 May 2020
    Iskandar Putra, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, 28000, Indonesia
    13 May 2020
    Author Response
    1. Inquiry 
    Change the title to: Effect of different biofloc starters on ammonia, nitrate, and nitrite concentrations in the culture of tilapia Oreochromis niloticus.

    Response: Thank you for your suggestion. I have ... Continue reading

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 3
VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 24 Apr 2020
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.