Keywords
Biofloc, Carbon, Molasses, Water Quality
This article is included in the Agriculture, Food and Nutrition gateway.
Biofloc, Carbon, Molasses, Water Quality
In the introduction, we corrected MS articles according to the reviewers' suggestions; the statement "no information" was replaced by "limited information".
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Christopher Marlowe Caipang
Water quality is a crucial factor in aquaculture systems. One important water quality parameter is nitrogen. In water, nitrogen can be found in the forms of ammonia, nitrite, and nitrate1–5. Ammonia (NH3-N) is produced from the breakdown of proteins from unconsumed feed, feces, and urine of fish. This compound will turn into nitrite (NO2) when oxygen levels are poor6, which is toxic for fish7. By contrast, ammonia is changed into nitrate when the dissolved oxygen level is sufficient8,9. Fish produces ammonia (inorganic N) through the osmoregulation process; feces and urine contribute about 10%–20% of total nitrogen10. The application of biofloc is one of the alternatives to overcome water quality problems especially in controlling total ammonia nitrogen in the aquaculture system11–13.
Biofloc refers to the use of heterotrophs and autotrophs, which can convert organic waste into floc forms that can be utilized by fish as a food source4,11,14–16. Biofloc technology is cheap, simple, and environmentally friendly13,17. Several organisms, such as bacteria, plankton, fungi, and algae, and suspended particles exist in flocs18,19. These organisms provide nutrition for cultured fish. However, the formation of biofloc needs a starter consisting of probiotics and a carbon source. Molasses, tapioca, and wheat flours are common starters in biofloc culture (African catfish, Nile tilapia, Litopenaeus vannamei)16,19–23. Presently, limited information is available on the best starter for biofloc in the cultured system of red tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Thus, the present study aimed to explore the best starter for biofloc in a red tilapia O. niloticus culture system.
The research was carried out for 40 days from February 2019 to March 2019 at the Aquaculture Technology Laboratory, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine, Riau University, Indonesia. The experiments were carried out within the ethical guidelines in animal research developed by NC3Rs. In Indonesia, no approval is required to conduct research on fish.
A completely randomized design with four levels of treatment and three replications was performed in this study; the tested treatment was four starters of biofloc, namely control without a starter (treatment A), biofloc with molasses starter concentration 0.48 gL−1 (treatment B), biofloc with tapioca starter concentration 0.35 gL−1 (treatment C), and biofloc with sucrose concentration 0.42 gL−1 (treatment D).
The amount of carbon added is calculated based on the carbon content (C) in the ingredients and the nitrogen content in the feed given5 using the formula:
C/N = (% C starter x molecule weight of starter + % C feed x feed weight)/ % N feed x feed weight. Based on this formula, to obtain a C/N ratio of 20: 1, a carbon source derived from molasses was 48 g with a C content of 37%24, tapioca flour as much as 35 g with a C content of 50.3%25, and sucrose 42 g with a C content of 42.3%26.
Biofloc was cultured using 0.01 ml/L probiotic bacteria from Boster Multisel (Bacillus sp.)16, and the carbon source was from starters based on the tested treatments with the C/N ratio of 20:1. The starter was applied in cultivation media and probiotic bacteria administration. Probiotics and starter were applied into cultivation cultured media and left for 1 week, and the media were aerated continuously. The starters were added every week for maintaining the floc. Floc formation was indicated by green water and foam forming in the media.
The number of fish used in this study was 360 individuals and they were obtained from a hatchery in the Bengkalis Regency, Riau. The fish were 50 days old, 3.71±0.11 cm TL. As the sex of the fish cannot be identified morphologically, there is no separation of fish sex in this study. The fish was distributed into research tanks as the flocs are formed, 7 days after the starter was cultured in the tanks (total 12 tanks, 100L volume). The density of the fish was 30 fishes/100 L. Stocking of red tilapia larvae in the morning at 8 AM with a water temperature of 25°C The fish were fed on commercial diet containing 38% crude protein, 5% crude lipid, and 6% crude fiber (PF1000, PT Matahari Sakti). Feeding was conducted ad libitum/satiation, 2 times/day (8 AM and 5 PM) for 40 days.
The ammonia (NH3), nitrite (NO2−), and nitrate (NO3+) contents were measured by spectrophotometry. These parameters were measured every 8 days in each treatment for 40 days. Ammonia (NH3), Nitrite (NO2−) and Nitrate (NO3+) were measured using spectrophotometer (Optima - SP300) at a wavelength of 630 nm27. The measurement was conducted at 8:00 AM with three replications at 8-day intervals over 40 days (six timepoints).
Over the six timepoints measured, the mean concentration of ammonia ranged from 0.02 mg L−1 to 0.07 mg L−1 (with an average value of 0.03 ± 0.02 mg L−1), nitrite ranged from 0.20 mg L−1 to 0.43 mg L−1 (with an average value of 0.25 ± 0.12 mg L−1), and nitrate ranged from 0.64 mgL−1 to 3.20 mgL−1 (with an average value of 1.42 ± 1.19 mg L−1). The study revealed that the best concentrations of ammonia, nitrite, and nitrate were recorded in the biofloc starter of molasses. These values did not significantly differ from those obtained with the tapioca and sucrose starters, but they were significantly different from the control treatment without a starter (Table 1). Raw values for each replicate are available as Underlying data28.
Data values are the mean and standard deviation. Mean values with different superscripts in the same row were significantly different (p < 0.05).
In the control treatment, the concentrations of ammonia, nitrite, and nitrate increased gradually with increasing experimental time. However, in the starter treatments, the ammonia concentration dropped during the first week of the experiment (day 8), became stagnant during the second and third weeks (day 16 to day 24), and increased again at day 32 of the experiment. However, the ammonia concentration decreased sharply at day 40 (Figure 1a). The nitrite concentration also decreased during the first week but increased slightly at day 16 and increased gradually until day 40 in treatments C (tapioca) and D (sucrose). By contrast, the nitrite concentration decreased at day 24, increased at day 32, and decreased at day 40 (Figure 1b). The nitrate concentration was relatively stagnant from day 1 to day 8. The nitrate concentration fluctuated during the experiment (Figure 1c). In general, the molasses starter (treatment B) yielded slightly better results than the other starters, but no significant different was found between the treatments except the control. The data of the growth performance of the red tilapia fish O. niloticus has been published separately29.
The study revealed that the concentrations of ammonia, nitrite, and nitrate were significantly lower in the biofloc system using starters compared with those in the system without a starter (control). Biofloc has probiotic bacteria that can change ammonia to nontoxic materials (such as nitrate) that are useful for phytoplankton growth. Therefore, the ammonia and nitrate concentrations are low in the culture media19,21,30. Biofloc does not necessarily only contain bacteria (for example, Bacillus), but is also composed of other useful microorganisms such as microalgae and zooplankton that are trapped by organic particles31. Algae and zooplankton can be used by cultured biota (tilapia) as natural food.
In general, the starters used in this study were carbohydrate compounds. However, the study showed that the molasses starter yielded slightly better results compared with the other starters. This finding indicated that molasses was the best carbon source for biofloc in the tilapia culture system. Molasses can provide a sufficient carbon level for heterotrophic bacteria that use this carbon as an energy source for growth6,19,21,23,32. Molasses are a liquid byproduct from the sugar industry. This material has a total carbon content of around 37%24. Therefore, molasses are rapidly soluble in water and can be quickly absorbed by heterotrophic bacteria3. In terms of chemical structure, molasses are classified as a simple carbohydrate containing six C atoms (monosaccharides), while sucrose (treatment D) is a combination of two monosaccharides that contain 12 C atoms (sucrose). Tapioca is classified as a complex carbohydrate (60,000 C atoms) and is more slowly digested by bacteria than molasses25,33.
Carbon source from molasses is effective in reducing concentrations of ammonia, nitrite, and nitrate in red tilapia culture with biofloc technology.
Figshare: Effect of different biofloc starters on ammonia, nitrate, and nitrite concentrations in the cultured tilapia Oreochromis niloticus system. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1202795128.
This project contains raw data for the concentration of ammonia, nitrate and nitrite in each tank at each timepoint.
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).
The authors thank the undergraduate students who assisted the authors during experiments in the laboratory.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Environmental Science, Sustainability Science and Governance for Sustainablity
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Aquaculture, biotechnology, aquatic microbiology, fish health management
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Aquaculture, biotechnology, aquatic microbiology, fish health management
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: (Agriculture and Biological Sciences, Environmental Science, Sustainability Science and Governance, Environment and Development)
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Aquaculture, biotechnology, aquatic microbiology, fish health management
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 3 (revision) 02 Jun 20 |
read | read |
Version 2 (revision) 13 May 20 |
read | |
Version 1 24 Apr 20 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)