ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article
Revised

Effect of feed enriched with fermented coconut water products on growth and carcass composition of gurami sago (Osphronemus goramy Lacepède, 1801) juvenile.

[version 2; peer review: 3 approved with reservations]
PUBLISHED 29 Dec 2023
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Agriculture, Food and Nutrition gateway.

Abstract

Background

Giant gourami (Osphronemus goramy Lacepede, 1801) is a popular freshwater species in Indonesia, but there is limited information on feed used for its cultivation. Therefore, this study aims to determine effect of feed enriched with fermented coconut water and palm sap sugar solution on growth, feed efficiency, and carcass composition of juvenile sago gurami.

Methods

A total of 2 litres coconut water and 1litres palm sap sugar solution (10%) were formulated. Each formulated product was then mixed with 6 g Aspergillus niger (P1), 6 g Rhizopus oligosporus (P2), and 6 g Saccharomyces cerevisiae (P3) to obtain the supplements. Subsequently, supplementation was carried out on commercial feed at a dose of 300 ml/kg of feed. Samples supplemented with P1, P2, and P3 were designated P1, P2, and P3 diets, while feed added to freshwater was considered P4 (placebo). Gurami sago juvenile (initial weight 50±2.5 g and length 13.2±0.4 cm) were then placed in triplicate nets (2×1×1 m) in a freshwater concrete pond with a stocking density of 30 fish/net.

Results

The different products formulations had a significant effect (p<0.05) on growth performance. The weight gain in P1, P2, P3, and P4 diets were 167.24%, 193.99%, 134,22%, and 115.98%, respectively. For feed conversion efficiency, the values obtained were 0.65, 0.73, 0.65, and 0.64 in P1, P2, P3, and P4, respectively. Furthermore, supplementing commercial feed with varying products formulation had a significant impact (p<0.05) on the fatty acid composition and carcass body of gurami sago. Lipid content in fish carcass fed P1, P2, P3, and P4 were 2.90%, 4.42%, 2.98%, and 2.76%, respectively.

Conclusion

Based on the results, P2 contained a higher concentration of fatty acids compared to other diets, leading to increased body weight, feed efficiency, and carcass fatty acid composition in sago gurami reared in freshwater concrete ponds.

Keywords

Aquaculture, fatty acids profile, coconut water, palm sap sugar, giant gourami, growth performance, feed efficiency

Revised Amendments from Version 1

The author has made several significant changes to this paper. These changes include refinements to the title, methods and abstract results. In the introduction section, a crucial statement added is the supplementation of commercial feed with a formulated product consisting of coconut water, palm sugar, and various fermented fungi (Aspergillus niger, Rhizopus oligosporus, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae). This formulation has not been tested on fish before. In the methods section, the author has included information that the floating commercial feed used has a diameter of 2 mm. The samples are then gradually provided to ensure complete consumption by the experimental fish, preventing washout and dissolution of the fermentation products sprayed into the rearing water during feeding. Different formula additions to the experimental feed are performed daily before being given to the experimental fish. To analyze and approximate carcass composition, fish samples are euthanized by injecting their brains with a No. 7.5 G x 1-inch livestock syringe to examine the entire carcass. The discussion section provides information on the relative functions of coconut water and palm sugar and their influence on feed nutrition. In the conclusion section, it is added that the P2 (presumably the formulated product) improves fish growth, feed efficiency, and carcass fatty acids. With these changes, the paper becomes more comprehensive and provides more transparent and detailed information.

See the authors' detailed response to the review by Norazmi-Lokman Nor Hakim
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Nurul Huda

Introduction

Giant gourami (Osphronemus goramy Lacepede, 1801) is one of the most important freshwater fish species in Indonesia due to its high market value14. However, its contribution to the total production of freshwater aquaculture is lower compared to tilapia, African catfish, and Pangasius catfish5. This has led to the active engagement of the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries of the Republic of Indonesia in encouraging fish farmers to increase the annual production of giant gurami from various local strains, including Tambago, Palapa, Bastar, Galunggung, Blusafir, and Sago4,68.

Several global initiatives have been implemented to enhance production of giant gurami using aquaculture activities, such as adjusting feeding rates in floating cages9, changing stocking density in concrete freshwater ponds4, and diversifying aquaculture systems, including earthen freshwater ponds, concrete freshwater ponds, and floating cages7,8,10. Although these aquaculture operations use commercial pellet fish food, feed conversion ratio (FCR) remains elevated, ranging between 1.43 and 1.65. This condition often leads to a low feed efficiency ratio, where 30 to 40% of the meal consumed is released as a waste load to water bodies4,8,11, thereby causing significant concerns due to the high cost of fish feed1218.

Various strategies have been developed to improve aquafeed nutrition, including enrichment with fish oil9,19, soybean oil20, iodine + selenium21, EPA + DHA22, and probiotics23. The enrichment process is often carried out to increase the amino acids, fatty acids, minerals, and vitamin content, which cannot be produced by the animals in sufficient quantities to meet their needs17,24,25.

At present, it is essential to evaluate the supplementation of feed with natural ingredients that are cost-effective and sustainable from plant resources, without compromising growth of cultured fish and aquafeed quality. Among these natural ingredients are coconut water and palm sap sugar, which both contain health-friendly nutrients, such as minerals, amino acids, enzymes, organic acids, fatty acids, vitamins, and phenolic compounds21,2528. Coconut water has been successfully used to treat various diseases in humans, including throat infections, tapeworms, gonorrhea, digestive problems, influenza, lice, giardia, bronchitis, and cholera2931. Furthermore, palm sap sugar has also been reported to possess health benefits due to its low glycemic index as well as antioxidants, vitamins, and minerals content3234. Previous reports have showed the ability of fungus to improve aquafeed's nutritional value15,35,36. The supplementation of commercial feed with formulated products consisting of coconut water, palm sugar, and fermented various fungus (Aspergillus niger, Rhizopus oligosporus, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae) has never been tested on fish. Therefore, this study aims to determine effect of feed enriched with fermented coconut water products on juvenile sago gurami's growth and carcass composition (Osphronemus goramy Lacepède, 1801). The health lipid index of the samples was also evaluated by assessing various types of fatty acids in carcass. In this study, it was hypothesized that the use of various formulated products as supplements could improve the nutritional quality of feed and carcass, feed efficiency, and juvenile growth rate.

Methods

Ethical statement

This study was carried out by Hafrijal Syandri and colleagues under the project entitled Optimization of New Formula Products Based on Local Materials To Strengthen Food Independence In The Aquaculture Sector In The New Normal Era of Coronavirus Disease (Covid-19). Furthermore, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia funded this study, with grant number:170/E4.1/AK.04.PT/2021. The procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee for Research and Community Service at Bung Hatta University (110/LPPM/Hatta/III-2021, in line with the ARRIVE guidelines. Approval was also given to collect and rear juvenile gurami sago in the Aquaculture Laboratory, Faculty of Fisheries, and Marine Science Universitas Bung Hatta. All efforts had been made to relieve the suffering of experimental animals, showing gurami sago didn't suffer and were still in good condition during their return to the pond after the procedures. For euthanized samples, the process was carried out by piercing part of the fish's brain. Gurami sago fish were not classified as a protected animal according to Indonesian legislation.

Preparation of formulated product

A total of 300 g of palm sap sugar (Arenga pinnate M.), purchased from local farmers, was cooked in 3,000 ml freshwater at 60 °C for 15 minutes and then cooled for 20 minutes in an open space. Subsequently, 3 liters of the sample was mixed with 6 liters of mature coconut water (Cocos nucifera L.). The total products formulated was 9 liters, which was divided into three containers of 3 liters. The first, second, and third parts were added with 6 g of Aspergillus niger (P1), 6 g of Rhizopus oligosporus (P2), and 6 g of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (P3), respectively. Each portion (3,000 ml) was fermented for 48 hours in a plastic jerry can with a capacity of 5 liters. The aeration process was then carried out continuously using Aerasi Fujimac MAC-40K-40L/min made in Japan.

Preparation of experiment diets

The floating commercial feed used had a diameter of 2 mm, with a proximate composition (dry weight %) of 10.66% moisture content, 30.10% crude protein, 4.09% crude fat, and 45.35% carbohydrate total, 2.5% ash, and 9.18% crude fiber. Furthermore, it was supplemented with products P1, P2, and P3, up to 300 ml/1 kg. Commercial feed with only freshwater (P4) was used as a control in the procedures. All products were each sprayed evenly to 1 kg of the commercial feed, and dried in open air for 30 minutes. The samples were then given gradually to ensure complete consumption by the experimental fish. This was carried out to prevent the leaching and dissolution of sprayed fermentation products into the rearing water during feeding. The addition of different formulas to the experimental diet was carried out every day before being given to the experimental fish.

Experimental procedures and sampling

A total of 360 juvenile gurami sago of local strains were obtained from the Aquaculture Laboratory Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science at Universitas Bung Hatta Padang of Indonesia. The exclusion criteria were samples in poor health or did not eat the commercial food initially provided. Furthermore, the samples were acclimatized for 30 days before the experiment, which commenced in January 2021. Juvenile fish were placed in the concrete freshwater pond 24-m3 (6×4×1 m) with a capacity of 5,600 L. During the acclimation, juvenile was fed commercial feed with 30.10% crude protein content, 4.09% crude fat, 2.5% crude ash, and 9.18% crude fiber. Feeding was carried out three times daily (09.00 AM, 1.00 PM, and 5.00 PM), and the fish were fed the equivalent of 3% of their body weight per day.

The 360 juvenile gurami sago had an average weight and length of 50±2.5 g and 13.2±0.4 cm and had not been previously in earlier studies. The weight of the sample was measured using AD-600i scales with 0.001 g accuracy (ACIS model number AD-600i, China) and its use was approved by the Indonesian Directorate of Metrology. Meanwhile, body length was measured using a meter ruler with 1 mm accuracy. The fish were distributed in 12 nets framed with size 2-m3 (2×1×1 m) PVC pipe (1200 L capacity) placed inside two freshwater concrete ponds of size 18-m3 (6×2×1.5 m). The experimental groups were P1, P2, and P3 along with one control group (P4) with three replications each (12 total). Each net contained 30 fish, and the samples were randomized to groups using a lottery method by Hafrijal Syandri and Azrita undefined. Water temperature varied between 27 °C and 30 °C (mean 28.5 °C), while the dissolved oxygen (DO) level was 5.8 to 6.2 mg L-1 (mean 5.72), with pH of 6.5-6.8 (mean 6.67). The parameters of temperature, DO level, and pH were recorded weekly throughout the experiment. Water samples were collected at 10.00 AM at a depth of 20 cm from each concrete pond for the determination of these parameters. Water temperature, oxygen, and pH were measured using a thermometer (Celcius scale), oxygen meter (YSI model 52, Yellow Spring Instrument Co, Yellow Spring, OH, USA), and pH meter (Digital Mini- pH meter, 0-14pH, IQ Scientific, Cemo- Science Thailand).

Fish were given feed of 2 mm floating type pellets supplemented with products formulation P1, P2, P3, and control (P4) three times a day at 9.00 AM, 1.00 PM, and 5.00 PM. Furthermore, the samples were hand-fed at a 3% body weight rate per day until the end of the study, which was after rearing them for 90 days from February to April 2021. Each experimental fish received well-fermented pellets until full consumption. The samples were collected every 30 days to evaluate length and weight by fasting them for 24 hours before sampling to empty the intestinal contents. A total of 9 fish per net were randomly sampled every 30 days and euthanized with tricaine methanesulfonate (MS 222, Sigma Aldrich Co, USA MO, 50 mg L-1), followed by measurement of length and weight. The amount of MS 222 used was 2,000 mg at each measurement of the sample (0, 30, 60, and 90 days).

Proximate composition

This study used standard methods from the Association of Authorized Analytical Chemists37 to analyze the proximate composition of experimental diets and fish carcass. Furthermore, one fish (mean weight 100 g) from each experiment replicates (P1, P2, P3), and control (P4) were collected from the rearing nets and then euthanized by injecting their brains with a No. livestock iron syringe 7.5 G x 1 inch to examine the whole-body carcass. Samples of the diet and wet fish were dried at 105 °C for two hours. The crude protein was analyzed using an automatically processed Kjeldahl (Buchi 430/323) using a Kjeltec methods (6.25), automatic Kjeldahl system (Buchi/430/323) model 1625, Moline IL USA. The fat content was assessed using a Soxhlet Apparatus with the Soxhlet system 1046 (Foss, Hoganas Sweden). The ash content was analyzed using a muffle furnace (600 °C for four hours), and the total carbohydrates was calculated by subtracting the sum of % crude protein, % crude fat, % crude ash, and % moisture contents from 100%37. The proximate composition of diets and carcass was calculated by P.T. Saraswanti Indo Genetech Bogor Indonesia (SIG Laboratory, Accredited Testing Laboratory-LP-184-IDN).

Fatty acids analysis

Diets and carcass were analyzed with a fatty acid composition using the gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) method. The total lipid extraction was carried out using the method proposed by Folch et al. (1957) with few modifications, as described by Rajion, 198538 using a chloroform: methanol (2.1. v/v) solvent system. Transmethylation was performed using 14% methanolic boron trifluoride. Furthermore, diets and carcass was analyzed for fatty acid composition by PT. Saraswanti Indo Genetech Bogor Indonesia (SIG Laboratory, Accredited Testing Laboratory-LP-184-IDN).

Calculations

A total of 9 fish sampled from each net were weighed and accounted for separately during the final sampling. Weight gain (WG, %), specific growth rate (SGR, %/day), FCR, and feed conversion efficiency (FCE) were assessed based on formulas9,10,39:

WG(%)=Finalweight(g)Initialweight(g)Initialweight(g)×100
SGR(%/day)=(LogharvestsweightLogstockweight)Culturedays×100
FCR=FeedsupplyinkgTotalharvestweightinkg
FCR(%)=1FeedConversionRatio

The nutritional quality of lipids AI and TI was calculated based on the equations40.

AI=[(C12:0+4×C14:0+C16:0)]MUFA+n6+n3
TI=[(C14:0+C16:0+C18:0)][(0.5×MUFA)+(0.5×n6)+(3×n3)+(n3/n6)

where

AI = Atherogenic index

TI = Trombogenic index

C12:0 = lauric acid

C14:0 = myristic acid

C16:0 = palmitic acid

C18:0 = stearic acid

ΣMUFA = sum concentrations of all MUFA

Σn-6 = sum concentrations of n-6 PUFA

Σn-3 = sum concentrations of n-3 PUFA

Data analysis

The data obtained in this study were analyzed using the SPSS 16.0 software package (SPSS; Chicago IL). Levine's test was used to determine the homogeneity of data, and one-way ANOVA was used for determining the treatment effect, followed by a post hoc Duncan's multiple range test41. Data were reported as mean value ± standard deviation for each treatment42. Furthermore, Microsoft Office Professional Plus 2019 was used for plotting the figures.

Results

Growth performance and whole-body biochemical composition from the different treatments

In this study, no samples were excluded from the analysis and procedures. Figure 1 showed growth performance of gurami sago at 30, 60, and 90 days for all groups during the experimental phase. Furthermore, no death was observed with any diets and the survival remained at 100% for all treatments during the 90 days of experimentation. Juvenile gurami sago fed with P2 had significantly higher growth performance with increased weight gain, lower FCR, and improved FCE, compared to others with P1, P3, and P4, as shown in Table 1. The P2 diet also led to a significant increase in fat and carbohydrates but there was no significant difference in protein, as shown in Table 2.

b09f5a61-ded2-4b1a-96b9-0a4c9ec3860c_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Growth performance of gurami sago at 30, 60, and 90 days for all groups (P1, P2, P3, P4) during the experimental phase.

Table 1. Growth performance of gurami sago from the different treatments after the 90-days experimental period (average ± standard deviation).

Diet P1Diet P2Diet P3Diet P4 P-value
Biometric measurements
Initial body weight (g)49.40±3.8050.26±0.4750.69±2.4850.80±0.68
Final body weight (g)132±2.08b147.74±1.02a 118.74±1.22c 109.73±1.89d 0.435
Weight gain (%)167.24±13.97b 193.99±4.46a 134.22±12.59c 115.98±2.88d 0.011
Specific growth rate (%/day)1.09±0.10b 1.15±0.01a 0.95±0.06c 0.98±0.05d 0.033
FCR1.50±0.08b 1.36±0.04a 1.53±0.03c 1.55±0.02d 0.069
FCE0.65±0.01b 0.73±0.02a 0.65±0.01a 0.64±0.01a 0.394

a b c d – significant differences in rows. Analytical replicates n = 3

Table 2. Biochemical body composition of gurami sago from the different treatments after the 90-days experimental period (average ± standard deviation).

Diet P1Diet P2Diet P3Diet P4P-value
Proximate composition (g/100 g)
Moisture62.49±0.36d 62.77±0.26c 64.23±0.12b 65.55±0.39a 0.265
Protein30.29±0.45a 28.98±0.37a 29.30±0.16a 28.69±0.28a 0.363
Lipid2.88±0.02c 4.67±0.04a 2.99±0.03b 2.79±0.03d 0.505
Carbohydrates total1.98±0.07b 2.04±0.07a 1.30±0.08c 1.29±0.06d 0.834
Crude fibre0.68±0.01c0.82±0.01b0.95±0.04a0.37±0.01d0.096
Ash2.16±0.02a1.54±0.01d2.11±0.04b1.63±0.02c0.223

a b c d - significant differences in rows. Analytical replicates n = 3

Chemical composition of the diets from the different treatments

The fat content differed significantly among the four diets, with P2 showing significantly higher protein and fat contents compared to P1, P3, and P4. Carbohydrate content was similar in diets P1, P2, and P3 but significantly higher compared to P4. Furthermore, the energy content differed significantly among the four diets, as shown in Table 3.

Table 3. Proximate composition (% wet weight basis) of the experimental diets (average ± standard deviation).

Proximate
composition (g/100 g)
Diet P1Diet P2Diet P3Diet P4Initial
composition
P-value
Moisture36.95±0.79c 37.28±0.01b 35.60±0.16c 38.46±0.18a 10.660.005
Protein20.44±0.10a 21.27±0.12a 20.28±0.03a 19.36±0.41d 30.100.029
Crude lipids3.48±0.04b 3.65±0.11a 3.49±0.04c 3.08±0.05d 4.090.067
Carbohydrates29.60±0.74a 28.78±0.30ab 30.36±0.14ac 26.21±0.36d 45.350.101
Crude fibre6.74±0.06c 6.67±0.06b 6.38±0.22d 9.19±0.01a 9.180.105
Ash2.80±0.07a 2.36±0.01c 2.45±0.06b 2.75±0.30d 2.500.007
Energy (kcal/100g)234.4±0.29a 237.49±0.66b 240.55±0.81c 230.05±0.26d 340.99±0.40

a b c d - significant differences in rows, Analytical replicates n= 3

CF 781-2 – commercial pellet feed

Effect of different formulation products on the fatty acid profile of the diets

The four diets showed a high level of saturated fatty acids (SFA), with palmitic acid (C16:0) and stearic acid (C18:0) being the most abundant. The concentration of monosaturated fatty acids (MUFA) was similar in P1, P2, and P3 but very low in P4, with the highest values recorded for oleic acid (C18:1 n-9) in all diets. Myristoleic acid (C14-1 n-9) or heptadecenoic acid (C17:1 n-8) was not detected in P4 and initial feed composition. Regarding polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), P2 had the highest value, with linolenic acid (C18:3 n-3) being dominant. Furthermore, EPA (C20:5 n-3) and DHA (C22:6 n-3) were found in P1, P2, and P3, while these compounds were absent in P4 (Table 4).

Table 4. Fatty acid composition (% of total FA) and total lipids in the diet supplemented with the formulated products (average ± standard deviation).

Type FADiet P1Diet P2Diet P3Diet P4Initial
composition
P-value
C12:0 (Lauric acid)0.79±0.01a 0.65±0.01b 0.57±0.01c 0.35±0.01d 0.341.000
C13:0 (Tridecanoic acid)n.dn.dn.dn.dn.d-
C14:0 (Meristic acid)0.75±0.01a 0.74±0.0b 0.75±0.01ac 0.51±0.01d 0.130.446
C15:0 (pentadecanoic acid)0.95±0.01a 1.01±0.0b 1.03±0.01c n.dn.d0.094
C16:0 (Palmitic acid)27.4±0.15a27.55±0.0b23.45±0.01c19.07±d21.050.014
C17:0 (Heptadecanoic acid)0.22±0.01a 0.24±0.0b 0.17±0.0c 0.12±0.0d 0.450.931
C18:0 (Stearic acid)5.25±0.01a 5.27±0.0b5.24±0.01c4.24±0.01d5.310.532
C20:0 (Arachidic acid)0.14±0.0a 0.53±0.01b 0.28±0.0c n.dn.d0.067
C24:0 (Lignoceric acid)n.dn.dn.dn.dn.d
∑ SFA35.5±0.17a 35.99±0.02b 31.49±0.03c 24.59±0.04d 27.280.117
C14-1 n-9 (Myristoleic acid)0.48±0.01a0.46±0.01b0.38±0.01cn.dn.d0.167
C16:1 n-7 (Palmitoleic acid)2.08±0.01a2.89±0.01b2.83±0.01c1.97±0.01d1.990.940
C17:1 n-8 (heptadecenoic acid)0.12±0.01a0.13±0.01b0.11±0.01cn.dn.d0.167
C18:1 n-9 (Oleic acid)26.88±0.01a27.68±0.01b23.35±0.02c19.76±0.01d22.981.000
C20:1 n=7 (Eicocyanic acid)0.15±0.01a0.14±0.01b0.15±0.00ac0.06±0.01d0.060.441
∑ MUFA29.71±0.04a31.33±0.04b26.82±0.03c21.79±0.02d25.030.849
C18:2 n-6 (Linoleic acid)27.81±0.01a28.86±0.01b27.21±0.01c22.66±0.01d25.210.702
C18:3 n-3 (Linolenic acid)1.07±0.01a1.08±0.01b1.07±0.01cn.dn.d0.167
C20:2 n-6 (Eicosadienoic acid)n.dn.dn.dn.dn.d
C20:4 n-6 (Arachidonic acid)0.21±0.01a0.20±0.01b0.21±0.01ac0.07±0.01d0.090.702
C20:5 n -3 (EPA)0.56±0.01a0.59±0.34b0.62±0.01cn.dn.d0.001
C22:6 n-3 (DHA)2.09±0.01a2.52±0.01b2.10±0.01cn.dn.d0.330
∑ PUFA31.74±0.02a32.66±0.03b31.21±0.05c22.78±0.02d25.3±0.020.002
∑n.dFA2.80±0.010.02±0.0110.48±0.0330.84±0.0322.39±0.01
∑FA (%)100100100100100
Σ n-33.74±0.03a4.19±0.02b3.82±0.02cn.dn.d0.066
Σ n-628.02±0.02a29.06±0.01b27.42±0.02c27.42±0.02d22.72±0.010.382
Σn-6/ Σn-37.53±0.06a6.93±0.03b7.17±0.04c0.00.00.036
PUFA/SFA0.85±0.03a0.85±0.01b1.04±0.08c0.92±0.02c0.96±0.0060.004
DHA/EPA3.66±0.05a4.21±0.10b3.34±0.02c0.00.00.030
Lipid content (%)3.47±0.01a3.68±0.02b3.49±0.00c3.09±0.00d3.12±0.030.494

a b c d - significant differences in rows

Values are % total fatty acid expressed as mean ± SE. of three separate determinations.

n.d = Unidentified fatty acids, SFA= Saturated fatty acids; MUFA= Monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA= Polyunsaturated fatty acid; FA= Fatty acids

Fatty acids profile of the whole body of gurami sago from the different treatments

Gurami fish fed diets P1, P2, P3, and P4 showed high levels of SFA in their body carcass, with palmitic acid (C16:0) and stearic acid (C18:0) being the most abundant. The oleic acid (C18:1 n-9) in all body carcass contained higher values. For samples fed P1 diet, carcass had the highest palmitoleic acid content (C16:1) compared to others. Furthermore, PUFA had the highest value in samples fed P2. The results showed that linolenic acid (C18:2n-6) was dominant among the four carcass. EPA and AA levels were lacking in all four samples, while DHA was high, as shown in Table 5.

Table 5. Fatty acids profile (% of total FA) of gurami sago fed with different diets after the 90-days experimental period.

Type FADiet P1Diet P2Diet P3Diet P4P value
C12:0 (Lauric acid)0.41±0.01a0.56±0.01b0.60±0.01c0.40±0.01d0.757
C13:0 (Tridecanoic acid)n.dn.dn.dn.d
C14:0 (Meristic acid)0.85±0.02a0.81±0.01b0.51±0.02c0.49±0.02d0.802
C15:0 (pentadecanoic acid)0.57±0.01a0.88±0.02b0.65±0.02c0.60±0.02d0.802
C16:0 (Palmitic acid)22.83±0.02a24.03±0.01b23.04±0.02c20.70±0.02d0.482
C17:0 (Heptadecanoic acid)0.11±0.01a0.14±0.02b0.12±0.02c0.11±0.02d0.786
C18:0 (Stearic acid)5.24±0.01a5.23±0.01b5.26±0.01c5.22±0.02d0.702
C20:0 (Arachidic acid)0.59±0.01a0.76±0.01b0.48±0.02c0.56±0.02d0.702
C24:0 (Lignoceric acid)0.07±0.01a0.09±0.01b0.05±0.02c0.03±0.01d0.757
∑ SFA30.70±0.30a 32.51±0.01b 30.72±0.03ac 30.51±1.64d 0.612
C14-1 n-9 (Myristoleic acid)n.dn.dn.dn.d
C16:1 n-7 (Palmitoleic acid)2.48±0.01a2.42±0.01b2.43±0.02c2.08±0.02d0.797
C17:1 n-8 (heptadecenoic
acid)
0.22±0.01a0.68±0.02b0.75±0.02c0.58±0.02d0.797
C18:1 n-9 (Oleic acid)26.19±0.01a26.46±0.01b24.18±0.02c21.98±0.02d0.702
C20:1 n=7 (Eicocyanic acid)0.26±0.01a0.39±0.02b0.29±0.02c0.25±0.02d0.786
∑ MUFA29.15±0.0a 29.95±0.02b 27.65±0.0c 24.89±0.03d 0.098
C18:2 n-6 (Linoleic acid)27.39±0.01a29.48±0.01b24.11±0.02c20.15±0.02d0.670
C18:3 n-3 (Linolenic acid)1.72±0.01a1.79±0.01b3.19±0.02c3.03±0.02d0.629
C20:2 n-6 (Eicosadienoic
acid)
0.36±0.0a0.42±0.01b0.28±0.01c0.27±0.01d0.532
C20:4 n-6 (Arachidonic acid)0.31±0.01a0.46±0.02b0.38±0.01c0.36±0.02d1.000
C20:5 n -3 (EPA)0.22±0.02a0.50±0.01b0.25±0.02c0.11±0.01ad0.983
C22:6 n-3 (DHA)2.08±0.01a2.11±0.02b2.14±0.01c2.08±0.01d0.546
∑ PUFA32.08±0.02a 34.76±0.02b 30.35±0.01c 26.00±0.02d 0.467
∑ ndFA8.07±0.02.79±0.011.25±0021.01±00
∑ FA (%)100100100100
Σ n-34.02±0.01a 4.4±0.03b 5.59±0.3c 5.22±0.02d 0.482
Σ n-628.06±0.96a 30.36±0.02b 24.77±0.44c 20.73±0.03d 0.001
Σn-6/ Σn-37.12±0.21a 6.74±0.31b 4.43±0.03d 3.97±0.03d 0.007
PUFA/SFA1.03±0.01a 1.07±0.01b 0.99±0.01c 0.92±0.0d 0.067
DHA/ EPA9.35±0.65a 4.08±0.11b 8.63±0.69c 18.54±2.54d 0.063
AI1.78±0.16a 1.75±0.0b 1.87±0.01c 1.79±0.02d 0.009
TI0.60±0.0a 0.56±0.05b 0.43±0.02c 0.72±0.02d 0.006
Lipid content (%)2.90±0.02a 4.42±0.01b 2.98±0.01c 2.76±0.03d 0.786

a b c d - significant differences in rows

Values are % total fatty acid expressed as mean ± SD. of three separate determinations.

n.d= Unidentified fatty acids, SFA= Saturated fatty acids; MUFA= Monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA= Polyunsaturated fatty acid; FA= Fatty acids

Initial commercial pellet feed

Discussion

Commercial feed supplemented with formulated products directly affected growth performance. In this study, the highest increases in final body weight (g), body weight gain (%), and specific growth rate (%/day) occurred in P2 at 147.74±1.02 g, 193.99±4.46%, and 1.15±0.01, respectively. Furthermore, supplementing feed with formula products caused a 30% decrease in feed protein level (initial composition) to 19.36±0.41% and 21.27±0.12% of all the experimental diets. Based on this result, the moisture of feed increased from 10.66% to a range of 35.60%-37.28%. Although the various treatments did not cause a difference in body protein levels, a significant effect was observed on the body weight of livestock. In this context, the experimental phase did not significantly affect carcass protein of the body. The protein content was also not different for each diet, but there was a difference between the final growth and FCR. FCR at diet P2 was 1.36, while a value of 1.55 was observed in P4. The commercial fish feed caused a higher FCR when the samples were cultured in earthen freshwater ponds (FCR = 1.87) compared to concrete freshwater ponds (FCR = 1.45)4,8. The weight gain and growth of the animal decreased with increasing fiber content in the diet43. P4 had a high fiber content because it did not contain formulated products, leading to lower growth and FCE compared to others.

Carbohydrate levels in all experimental diets were lower than the initial composition but had no effect on growth of gurami sago. This species belonged to the group of herbivorous fish10. Several studies had shown that herbivorous and omnivorous species could increase amylase activity higher than carnivores44. However, the poor overall growth was caused by low carbohydrate digestibility45. Previous reports had reported that fish growth and feed efficiency could increase by providing feed supplemented with varying levels of carbohydrates4648, regardless of the content of protein, fat, crude fiber, and carbohydrates in the experimental diet. This study recommended using products formulated from natural sources of coconut water, palm sugar, and fungus in commercial feed, thereby increasing production value of the net yield and bringing more significant financial benefits.

The aquaculture industry must use rich nutritional feed with high protein, fatty acids, minerals, and vitamin content16,17,49,50. Therefore, increasing feeding nutrition and maximizing digestive enzyme activity in farmed fish could be done by providing raw fermented feed ingredients15,5153. In this context, the new method used to improve feed quality, feed efficiency, and growth rate in gurami sago was to supplement the meals with formulated P1, P2, and P3 products. Coconut water contains growth factors that stimulate various types of bacteria with the aim of increasing nutrition54, because coconut water contains high amounts of amino acids and nutrients, especially potassium (in the range of 237.41 to 361.20 mg/100 mL), manganese (in the range of 20 to 197 μg/100 mL), and iron (0.51 mg/100 mL)55. On the other hand, palm sugar is also claimed to have health benefits because it has a low glycemic index and contains antioxidants, vitamins and minerals (32–34). This strategy had been successful in increasing the nutrient quality of commercial feed, where the sample supplemented with P2 had the highest total fat content with 35.99% SFA, 31.33% MUFA, and 32.66% PUFA. The results showed that P4 had the lowest total fat content, with 24.59% SFA, 21.79% MUFA, and 22.78% PUFA.

This study showed that the commercial fish feed equipped with P1, P2, and P3 contained more complete fatty acids at 3.47%, 3.68%, 3.49%, and 3.09%, respectively, compared to P4. Based on the results, P4 did not contain linolenic acid (C18:3 n-3), EPA (C20:5n-3), and DHA (C22:6n-3). This showed that commercial feed must be supplied with linolenic acid, EPA, and DHA due to their essential role in meeting physiological needs, production performance, and health22,5658. In this experiment, EPA + DHA levels were 2.65%, 3.11%, and 2.72% in P1, P2, and P3, while this parameter was not recorded in P4 (control). For Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) juvenile, the EPA and DHA levels in their diet were recommended to range from 0.50 to 1.0%59,60. Despite the absence of EPA and DHA values for P4, freshwater fish, including gurami sago, were estimated to be able to synthesize unsaturated fatty acids (HUFAs), such as C20 and C22, from C18 PUFA in feed through chain elongation and desaturation reactions. Adequate amounts of C18:3-n3 and C18:2n-6 were expected to meet their EFA requirements. The amount of DHA and EPA varied significantly between the P1, P2, and P3 diets, while DHA/EPA ratios increased due to supplementation with formulation products. The differences in the DHA/EPA ratio in each experimental diet were due to differences in the use of fermenters, namely Aspergillus niger, Rhizopus oligosporus, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. According to previous studies, the calculated ratio of DHA/EPA in the diet must be precise to develop better feed formulations61. For example, the ratios in the diet for maximum growth of Golden pompano, Trochinotus ovatus juvenile was 1.4617, 1.30 for gilthead seabream, Sparus aurata62, 0.53 for Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar in freshwater60, and 1.02 for Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus63.

This study estimated that a DHA/EPA ratio of 1.70 in the P2 diet could optimally increase growth rate and feed efficiency. However, these parameters depended on physiological, environmental, and farming factors64. The Aspergillus niger, Rhizopus oligosporus, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in this experiment had also been used in previous studies to ferment feed raw materials, such as corn-cob, soybean meal, and sunflower cake65,66. Furthermore, Rhizopus oligosporus was the main microorganism used in the fermentation process because it produced a wide range of enzymes, such as carbohydrase, proteases, lipases, and phosphatase6769. Coconut water also played an essential role in enriching the nutritional quality because it contained minerals, amino acids, enzymes, organic acids, fatty acids, vitamins, and a few phenolic compounds2628. Palm sap sugar had also been shown to have an essential role in increased feed quality due to its minerals, vitamins, and antioxidant content33,34.

Several freshwater fish species had low values of PUFA and higher levels of MUFA and PUFA19,69,70. However, gurami sago had a high level of PUFA and a lower presence of MUFA. The results showed that some of the fatty acids in the animal body were affected by diet. Palmitic acid (C16:0) in SFA group was the most abundant in all treatments but was lower in P4. The highest body carcass levels were obtained in P2 and P3 at 24.03% and 23.04%, respectively. The C:16 and C18:2 n-6 fatty acids accumulated in giant gurami fed high-fat content diets, as showed for common carp (Cyprinus carpio)71 and Atlantic salmon (Salmo solar)72. In experiments carried out with Oreochromis niloticus fed diets, rich in lipids, linolenic and oleic acids accumulated in significant concentrations19,71,73. Other fish species, such as Silver barb (Puntius gonionotous)74 and Asian red-tailed catfish (Hemibagrus wyckioides)75 could synthesize 20C PUFA of n-3 and n-6 series from 18C PUFA by desaturation and elongation. This capacity underscored the essential role of 20C PUFA in this group, serving as potential precursors of prostanoids. The potent ability had also been observed in other freshwater fish, such as the zebrafish (Danio rerio)76.

In this present study, eicosatrienoic acid (C20:2 n-6) was not detected in all experiment diets. However, the fatty acid was present in the body carcass of giant gurami in all treatments ranging from 0.27% to 0.42% of total fatty acids composition. This data showed that it had an essential role in the body of the animal. Gurami sago fish synthesized the compound from other precursors ranging from 0.095% and 0.097% of total body lipids composition. AA, EPA, and DHA fatty acids, which were restricted in the diets, remained in the experimental fish in different proportions. This difference was due to the variation of added products formulation to each diet.

The results showed that the giant gurami sago strain was capable of preserving its normal PUFA levels (C18:2 n-6, C18:3 n-3, C20:2 n-6, C20:4 n-6, C20:5 n -3 and C22:6 n-3), but these fatty acids were at very low or undetectable levels in the diets, such as eicosadienoic acid type. This showed that gurami sago, similar to other freshwater fish species, such as Oreochromis niloticus63 and Cyprinus carpio21, could elongate and desaturate fatty acids from precursors present in the diet, including 18C:0 fatty acids and possibly from linoleic fatty acid in large quantities.

The atherogenic index (AI) ranged from 1.68 and 2.19, and the thrombogenic index (TI) was between 0.43 and 0.72 in all diets. This result was related to a significant discrepancy in SFA values between experimental diets. Several studies had shown that AI and TI indexes were directly related to the levels of C14:0, C16:0, and C18:0, known as thrombogenic promoters19. AI and TI levels in gurami sago fed P1, P2, and P3 diets were lower compared to P4 (control). Several studies had shown that AI and TI indices showed the potential to stimulate platelet aggregation. The lower the value of these indices, the greater the protective potential of coronary artery disease77. The recommended AI and TI values by the Food and Agriculture Organization and the World Health Organization78 for human health ranged from 0.4 to 0.5. Although the AI and TI values of gurami sago were higher than 0.5, its consumption had no negative effect on consumers' health. In aquaculture, AI and TI indices, among others, depended on the levels of fish oil supplement in the diet19, the sources of oils9,57, effect of fish farming activities, and handling methods after harvest79. Several reports had also showed that feed quality, age, gender, species, and environmental conditions had significant effect69,70,80,81.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study showed that feed products made from natural and sustainable sources of coconut water, palm sap sugar, and fungus combined with commercial feed could enhance nutrient-rich diets in gurami sago. The main factor that improved after the treatment was the fatty acid composition of the PUFA group (i.e., linolenic acid, DHA, and EPA). Furthermore, the increase was related to growth rate, FCR, and FCE. The P2 formulation was optimal for feed quality, such as proximate and fatty acid composition. The results showed that P2 increased fish growth, feed efficiency, and carcass fatty acids. Based on the results, it also contributed to improving the nutritional quality of giant gourami lipids, which was beneficial to consumers' health. These results provided basic knowledge about efforts to improve the quality of nutrient-rich feed and the basis for efficient use of feed in future fish farming operations.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 08 Nov 2021
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Undefined A, Syandri H, Aryani N et al. Effect of feed enriched with fermented coconut water products on growth and carcass composition of gurami sago (Osphronemus goramy Lacepède, 1801) juvenile. [version 2; peer review: 3 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2023, 10:1121 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.74092.2)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 2
VERSION 2
PUBLISHED 29 Dec 2023
Revised
Views
2
Cite
Reviewer Report 19 Feb 2024
Mohamad Gazali, Department of Marine Science, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, University of Teuku Umar Meulaboh, Meulaboh, Aceh, Indonesia;  Institute of Marine Biotechnology, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (Ringgold ID: 95438), Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 2
The author performed to study the effect of feed enriched with fermented coconut water products on juvenile sago gurami’s growth and carcass composition (Osphronemus goramy). The results showed the growth performance of gurami sago at 30, 60, and 90 days ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Gazali M. Reviewer Report For: Effect of feed enriched with fermented coconut water products on growth and carcass composition of gurami sago (Osphronemus goramy Lacepède, 1801) juvenile. [version 2; peer review: 3 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2023, 10:1121 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.160040.r242846)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 08 Nov 2021
Views
8
Cite
Reviewer Report 16 Nov 2023
Norazmi-Lokman Nor Hakim, Fisheries and Aquaculture Centre, Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies – Taroona, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas, Australia 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 8
Language: Editing for the language is required throughout the manuscript due to too many mistakes or inappropriate use of some terms that might lead to confusion or misunderstanding. For example: abstract:  'Commercial feed added to freshwater is called the P4 diet ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Nor Hakim NL. Reviewer Report For: Effect of feed enriched with fermented coconut water products on growth and carcass composition of gurami sago (Osphronemus goramy Lacepède, 1801) juvenile. [version 2; peer review: 3 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2023, 10:1121 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.77807.r145759)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 29 Dec 2023
    Hafrijal Syandri, Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Universitas Bung Hatta, Padang, 25133, Indonesia
    29 Dec 2023
    Author Response
    1. The author will revise the title in the new version with the efficacy of feed enriched with fermented coconut water products on growth and carcass composition of gurami
    ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 29 Dec 2023
    Hafrijal Syandri, Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Universitas Bung Hatta, Padang, 25133, Indonesia
    29 Dec 2023
    Author Response
    1. The author will revise the title in the new version with the efficacy of feed enriched with fermented coconut water products on growth and carcass composition of gurami
    ... Continue reading
Views
29
Cite
Reviewer Report 28 Jan 2022
Nurul Huda, Faculty of Food Science and Nutrition, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 29
Title

There is a need to highlight improvement in the quality of commercial fish pellet by using local natural source ingredients.

Abstract

Methods: authors need to mention the percentage of palm ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Huda N. Reviewer Report For: Effect of feed enriched with fermented coconut water products on growth and carcass composition of gurami sago (Osphronemus goramy Lacepède, 1801) juvenile. [version 2; peer review: 3 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2023, 10:1121 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.77807.r118909)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 29 Dec 2023
    Hafrijal Syandri, Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Universitas Bung Hatta, Padang, 25133, Indonesia
    29 Dec 2023
    Author Response
    We have responded to article comments from Prof. Nurul Huda, Faculty of Food Science and Nutrition, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia.
    Abstract part

    Background: Giant gourami (Osphronemus ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 29 Dec 2023
    Hafrijal Syandri, Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Universitas Bung Hatta, Padang, 25133, Indonesia
    29 Dec 2023
    Author Response
    We have responded to article comments from Prof. Nurul Huda, Faculty of Food Science and Nutrition, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia.
    Abstract part

    Background: Giant gourami (Osphronemus ... Continue reading

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 08 Nov 2021
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.