ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Brief Report

Body mass index (BMI) and quality of life among long-term survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
PUBLISHED 04 Mar 2021
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Oncology gateway.

Abstract

Background: Adult survivors of childhood cancers such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are at risk of overweight and related chronic morbidities. As childhood cancer survival has been improving, long-term quality of life (QOL) among cancer survivors becomes more important. We examined the association of body mass index with physical and psychosocial QOL among childhood ALL survivors who returned for long-term follow-up after end of therapy.
Methods: Using a cross-sectional survey (2006-2012), we assessed the association between body mass index and quality of life in 58 long-term survivors of childhood ALL (ages 9 to 43 at the time of survey/measurement) using age-appropriate QOL instruments (Health-Related Quality of Life Short Form – SF-36 or Child Health Questionnaire-PF-50).
Results: Half of the participants were overweight or obese at the time of survey. Mean QOL scores were similar to population norms. Compared to underweight/healthy weight status, being overweight/obese was not significantly associated with poorer physical QOL, but with poorer psychosocial QOL (47.1±13.2 vs. 54.0±6.0, P=0.01, effect size Cohen’s d=0.67), which remained statistically significant after adjusting for age and sex.
Conclusions: Weight management should be the target of timely interventions among survivors of childhood ALL.

Keywords

obesity, BMI, leukemia, cancer survivorship, quality of life

Introduction

Survival rates for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have improved in the last few decades with five-year survival of standard risk pediatric ALL now exceeding 90%1. Adult survivors of childhood cancer are at increased risk of obesity (11–56%), metabolic syndrome, poor cardiac outcomes, and type-2 diabetes210. With improved survival, greater attention has been dedicated to treatment-related late effects and quality of life (QOL).

Excess weight is known to contribute to decreased QOL in individuals with chronic diseases, including adult cancer survivors11,12. Fewer studies have described the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and QOL in long-term pediatric cancer survivors, and in the studies that did, findings were mixed13,14. We examined the relationship between BMI and QOL among childhood ALL survivors who returned for long-term follow-up (LTFU) after completion of therapy. We hypothesized that being overweight/obese compared to a healthy weight at the time of survey completion would be associated with poorer QOL using validated measures.

Methods

Study design and participants

A cross sectional study was performed of all childhood ALL survivors receiving routine survivor-focused care in the University of Minnesota Childhood Cancer Survivor Program (CCSP) clinic between 2006–201215. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant survivors were excluded because of typically presumed higher rates of complications. At each CCSP visit, participants completed a QOL assessment. As part of their routine care, height and weight measurements were obtained. Height, weight, treatment and medical history were abstracted from the medical record. The University of Minnesota IRB approved this study (protocol number 0002M36181). Participants aged 18 years or older provided written consent; parents/guardians provided written consent for participants younger than 18 years; but participants over age 8 provided assent.

Measures

The primary main outcome of interest was general QOL, measured by the Child Health Questionnaire – PF50 (used for children <18 years, N=38; child’s QOL rated by parents), and the Health-Related Quality of life Short Form – SF-36 for participants > 18 years at survey1619. Both scales assess multiple QOL domains and can be aggregated into composite physical and psychosocial T-scores that are transformed to a 0–100 scale. Higher scores reflect a better QOL, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. BMI was measured as percentile for age and sex for those <21 years, and categorized in the following manner for participants aged ≥21 years: Underweight (<5% or <18.5 kg/m2), Healthy (5–85% or 18.5–24.9 kg/m2), Overweight (85–95% or 25–29.9 kg/m2) and Obese (>95% or >30 kg/m2), and further dichotomized into Underweight/Healthy vs. Overweight/Obese.

Statistical analysis

We compared patients’ demographics, clinical, and QOL data by weight status using Chi-squared and Fisher’s Exact tests for categorical variables and t-tests and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests for continuous variables as appropriate. A multivariate linear regression model was used to examine the relationship between BMI and physical and psychosocial QOL T-scores. We had to limit the number of covariates due to small sample size, adjusting for gender and age at time of survey only. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data were analyzed using SAS version 9.3 (Cary, NC).

Results

A total of 90 individuals completed the survey; 83 provided QOL data and 58 were eligible for this analysis. Most were non-Hispanic white (97%) and 47% were male (Table 1). The median age was 3.9 years at ALL diagnosis (range: 1.3–19.5) and 21 years at the time of survey (range: 9–43), with a median time of 11 years since diagnosis. Participants with overweight/obesity were further from their diagnosis of ALL than healthy weight/underweight participants (median 15 (range: 5–35) vs. 9 (range: 5–32) years since diagnosis, p=0.15). All survivors were treated with standard of care ALL chemotherapy protocols, and 41% received cranial radiation. Half (51%) of the participants were overweight/obese at time of survey completion vs. 15% at time of diagnosis, with a median BMI at time of survey of 26.2 (adults; range: 19.2–47.4), and a median BMI percentile for children of 78.3 (range: 17.6–99.7). The association of overweight/obesity at time of survey with overweight/obesity at diagnosis (p = 0.05) and with receipt of cranial radiation (p = 0.06) were close to statistically significant.

Table 1. Summary of patient characteristics by body mass index (BMI) at time of follow-up survey.

All Patients (N=58)Healthy weight (N=28)Overweight/obese (N=30)
VariableN%N%N%p-value
Gender0.12
   Female3153.51242.91963.3
   Male2746.61657.11136.7
Race/Ethnicity1.00
   White, Non-Hispanic5696.62796.42996.7
   Other23.513.613.3
Radiation0.06
   None3458.62071.41446.7
   Cranial/Whole Brain2441.4828.61653.3
BMI Category at Diagnosis0.05
   Underweight/Healthy4685.22596.22175.0
   Overweight/Obese814.813.9725.0
NMedian (Min-Max)NMedian (Min-Max)NMedian (Min-Max)p-value
Age at Diagnosis (years)583.9 (1.3-19.5)284.1 (1.3-19.5)303.5 (1.3-16.3)0.60
Age at Survey (years)5821.0 (9-43)2818.5 (10-35)3022.0 (9-43)0.19
Time between Survey and Diagnosis (years)5810.8 (4.9-34.7)289.1 (5.2-31.9)3015.4 (4.9-34.7)0.15

Mean physical (51.5±9.0) and psychosocial (50.4±10.8) QOL scores were consistent with population normative data, suggesting that survivors are functioning well overall (Table 2). Compared to underweight/healthy weight status, obesity/overweight status was associated with significantly poorer psychosocial QOL (47.1±13.2 vs. 54.0±6.0, P=0.01, effect size Cohen’s d=0.67) and this remained statistically significant after adjusting for age and sex (P=0.03). Overweight/obesity at time of survey was associated with poorer physical QOL (compared to underweight/healthy weight status; 49.9±8.6 vs. 53.2±9.3, P=0.17, effect size Cohen’s d=0.37), however this difference was not statistically significant.

Table 2. Physical and psychosocial quality of life (QOL) outcomes by body mass index at time of follow-up survey (N=58).

Everyone
(N=58)
Healthy weight /
underweight (N=28)
Overweight / obese (N=30)
VariableMean (SD)Mean (SD)Mean (SD)p-valueAdjusted p-value*
Physical QOL51.5 (9.0)53.2 (9.3)49.9 (8.6)0.170.31
psychosocial QOL50.4 (10.8)54.0 (6.0)47.1 (13.2)0.010.03

* adjusted for age at time of survey and gender.

Discussion

While obesity has been recognized as a late effect of pediatric ALL therapy, the extent to which this affects long-term survivors QOL remains unknown. In our population, half of our study participants were overweight/obese at time of survey, compared with 15% at time of diagnosis. QOL scores were similar to general population means across all weight groups, as was the prevalence of overweight/obesity in this population20. Overweight/obesity were associated with poorer physical QOL (unadjusted), and, when adjusted for age and sex, with poorer psychosocial QOL. Estimated effect sizes were small for psychosocial QOL and medium for psychological QOL21.

The large proportion of long-term ALL survivors who are overweight/obese, and the long-term increase in overweight/obesity after finishing treatment for ALL highlight a need for weight management, nutrition, and exercise interventions in survivors of childhood ALL22. Our findings suggest that such interventions may have co-benefits for survivors’ long-term QOL. Furthermore, participants with overweight/obesity were on average longer out from diagnosis, which suggests that time might be a factor in weight gain after ALL, but we could not test this given the cross-sectional nature of our study. Previous studies have examined the effectiveness of patient weight management interventions in primarily adult cancer populations; such interventions and their long-term effectiveness have been less studied for survivors of childhood cancers2325. Further research is necessary to evaluate the long-term feasibility, sustainability, and timing of such interventions among childhood cancer survivors, as these may have significant implications for survivors’ long-term QOL.

This study is consistent with other studies that found associations of obesity with poorer QOL but expands the data to include overweight survivors as well. However, this study has some limitations. This is a cross-sectional analysis and we could not determine the directionality of the associations we measured. Our sample size was small due to the single-site nature of the study, and participants were almost exclusively white, which may not be generalizable to the broader pediatric ALL survivor population. Underweight and healthy weight status were aggregated into one group due to small sample size, but given the understudied nature of underweight status and QOL in survivors of pediatric cancer, future studies may benefit for examining this category separately from healthy weight status.

These data demonstrate that pediatric ALL treatment carries with it a substantial burden for weight management issues well after therapy is completed, with possible implications for QOL. Weight management interventions are needed to increase awareness and to reduce weight gain in the years following treatment for childhood ALL. In addition to such interventions, future research should address the interplay between treatment for pediatric ALL and other factors, for example diet, physical activity, and sleep, and their combined contribution to unhealthy weight gain during and after ALL.

Data availability

Underlying data

Data for these analyses came from the University of Minnesota Fairview pediatric cancer survivor database. The data for this study were collected at the University of Minnesota; but we cannot share these data due to HIPAA reasons: for privacy reasons the consent form of the project specified that we will not share the data. Access to these data can only be given in the form of deidentified data, or through having an individual who is on the protocol run analyses on the data. For questions, Char Napurski is overseeing the database (bake0257@umn.edu).

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 04 Mar 2021
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Vankina SP, Vogel RI, Jewett PI et al. Body mass index (BMI) and quality of life among long-term survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2021, 10:178 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.44641.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 04 Mar 2021
Views
9
Cite
Reviewer Report 02 Nov 2021
Angela Maria Spinola-Castro, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology of Pediatric Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Oncology Institute - IOP/GRAACC, Federal University of Sao Paulo - UNIFESP/EPM, Sao Paulo, Brazil 
Adriana Miachon, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Pediatric Oncology Institute - IOP/GRAACC, Federal University of Sao Paulo - UNIFESP/EPM, Sao Paulo, Brazil 
Not Approved
VIEWS 9
This paper is about the relationship between body mass index and quality of life among long term survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The authors have hypothesized that being obese would be associated with poor QOL using validated measures. They ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Spinola-Castro AM and Miachon A. Reviewer Report For: Body mass index (BMI) and quality of life among long-term survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2021, 10:178 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.47713.r97420)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
8
Cite
Reviewer Report 01 Jul 2021
Annalisa Paviglianiti, Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Saint Antoine Hospital, Paris, France 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 8
The association of BMI and psycological QOL among children survivors was analyzed.

Compared to underweight/healthy weight status, being overweight/obese was not significantly associated with poorer physical QOL, but with poorer psychosocial QOL (47.1±13.2 vs. 54.0±6.0, P=0.01, effect ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Paviglianiti A. Reviewer Report For: Body mass index (BMI) and quality of life among long-term survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2021, 10:178 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.47713.r85986)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 04 Mar 2021
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.