Mental health problems of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic COVID-19 patients in hospitel in Thailand: A cross-sectional study

Nitchawan Kerdcharoen; Pantri Kirdchok; Chayut Wonglertwisawakorn; Yingrat Naviganuntana; Nongnuch Polruamngern; Chotiman Chinvararak

doi:10.12688/f1000research.125998.4

Home Browse Mental health problems of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic COVID-19...

ALL Metrics

Views

Downloads

Get PDF

Get XML

Export

▬

✚

Research Article

Revised

Mental health problems of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic COVID-19 patients in hospitel in Thailand: A cross-sectional study

[version 4; peer review: 2 approved]

Nitchawan Kerdcharoen¹, Pantri Kirdchok¹, Chayut Wonglertwisawakorn¹, Yingrat Naviganuntana¹, Nongnuch Polruamngern¹, Chotiman Chinvararak ¹

Nitchawan Kerdcharoen¹, Pantri Kirdchok¹, [...] Chayut Wonglertwisawakorn¹, Yingrat Naviganuntana¹, Nongnuch Polruamngern¹, Chotiman Chinvararak ¹

PUBLISHED 01 Apr 2025

Author details Author details

¹ Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, 10300, Thailand

Nitchawan Kerdcharoen
Roles: Conceptualization, Funding Acquisition, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Pantri Kirdchok
Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Chayut Wonglertwisawakorn
Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Yingrat Naviganuntana
Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Nongnuch Polruamngern
Roles: Data Curation, Funding Acquisition, Project Administration, Resources

Chotiman Chinvararak
Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

OPEN PEER REVIEW

REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Emerging Diseases and Outbreaks gateway.

This article is included in the Global Public Health gateway.

Abstract

Background

There is evidence that patients with COVID-19 have a higher prevalence of mental health problems than the normal population. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of mental health problems and their associated factors in patients with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic in the hospitel in Thailand.

Methods

Mental health problems were evaluated using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale - 21 items, and Patient Health Questionnaire-9. The prevalence of mental health problems was presented by frequency and percentage. McNemar's test was used to compare the prevalence of mental health problems between day 1 and day 7. Binary logistic regression was used to identify potential predictors of mental health problems.

Results

A total of 186 participants (68.3% female; mean age = 37.21 years (SD 13.66) were recruited. The depression, anxiety, and stress rate on day 1 of admission was 26.9%, 32.3% and 25.8%, respectively. Having mild COVID-19 symptoms was a significantly associated factor with anxiety (OR=2.69, 95%CI: 1.05-6.89) and stress (OR=4.53, 95%CI: 1.32-15.55).

Conclusions

There was a high rate of mental health problems in COVID-19 patients. Detecting and managing mental health problems should be considered standard care for COVID-19 patients.

Keywords

Mental health problems; COVID-19; Hospitel; Thailand

Corresponding author: Chotiman Chinvararak

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information: This study received a grant from Navamindradhiraj University Research Fund.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Copyright: © 2025 Kerdcharoen N et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite: Kerdcharoen N, Kirdchok P, Wonglertwisawakorn C et al. Mental health problems of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic COVID-19 patients in hospitel in Thailand: A cross-sectional study [version 4; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2025, 11:1089 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.125998.4) First published: 22 Sep 2022, 11:1089 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.125998.1) Latest published: 01 Apr 2025, 11:1089 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.125998.4)

Revised Amendments from Version 3

We added a name to the Acknowledgements.

See the authors' detailed response to the review by Sorawit Wainipitapong

Introduction

Since the World Health Organization announced the emergency statement regarding the pandemic of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on 30 January 2020, Thailand, like other countries, has to face the rise of new cases of COVID-19. The number of positive COVID-19 cases exceeded the health system's capacity. However, at the beginning of the pandemic, Thailand did not have a home isolation policy and stated that all patients would be under the medical team's care. Therefore, the Thai government set up the “hospitel”, a new type of health care facility.¹

The term “hospitel” is the compound noun from the “hospital” and “hotel”. It is a new type of health care facility specialised for COVID-19 patients who are asymptomatic or have only mild symptoms. A hospitel is organised and run by the hotel and medical staffs from an affiliated public hospital. The team includes general practitioners, nurses and paramedics. Patients in hospitel are monitored regularly and are quarantined for seven days or until they have negative COVID-19 test results.¹ Hence, hospitels also aim to prevent the spread of COVID-19 in the community.¹

Although patients are regularly monitored for physical complications, mental health problems, especially stress adjustment, may be under-recognised. The meta-analysis study by Liu et al., 2021 found that anxiety symptoms and depression rates in COVID-19 patients were 32% and 27.6%, respectively.² Moreover, insomnia was found to have a prevalence of 30.30%. While the study in Thailand by Lerthattasilp et al., 2020 showed that the prevalence of depression was found to be 22.5%, whilst the anxiety rate was 30%, and the stress rate was 20%.³ The study by Lerthattasilp et al. was conducted in a field hospital that has a similar concept of caring to “hospitel”.³ This data demonstrated that patients with COVID-19 are more likely to suffer mental health problems than the normal population. In addition, early studies revealed that the female gender, physical symptoms related to COVID-19, duration of hospitalisation, and a history of psychiatric disorders were associated factors to mental health problems.³^–⁷

The objective of the present study was to investigate the prevalence of mental health problems, including depression, anxiety and stress, as well as their associated factors in patients with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic in the hospitel in Thailand, which is under the supervision of the Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital. The Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital is responsible for caring for COVID-19 patients from the Thonburi district in Bangkok. We hypothesise that the prevalence of mental health problems is likely to be high on day 1 at admission and will decline after 7 days. However, despite to the new outbreak of COVID-19 globally, there are still limited studies on mental health problems. Recognising this concern is essential to the Thai public health sector in order to implement appropriate measures to tackle mental health problems related to COVID-19 infection.

Methods

Ethics and consent

We obtained approval from the Ethical Committee of the Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital on July 2^nd, 2021 (COA no. 106/2564). Before starting the survey, all participants were informed of the study's objectives, method, and provided written informed consent.

Study design, setting and participants

We employed a cross-sectional descriptive study based on STROBE guidelines.⁸ The sample size was calculated following the Cochrane formula.⁹ As the number of COVID-19 patients (N) admitted to the hospitel between July and September 2021 was 250, the sample size was estimated by p = 0.198 according to the study by Jeong et al., 2019.⁷ Using alpha at 0.05 and error (d) at 0.05, the required sample size was 124. 186 asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic COVID-19 patients, according to COVID-19 treatment guidelines by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), aged 18 years and older were recruited by purposive sampling in-person when the participant was initially admitted to the hospitel under the supervision of the Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital from July to September 2021. Patients who could not use the internet were excluded from this study.

Data collection

The study instruments consisted of four questionnaires: 1) demographic characteristics including sex, age, education level, employment status, financial status, and living status; 2) clinical characteristics including severity of COVID-19, duration of COVID-19 infection, duration admitted in the hospitel, referring status, admission status, history of medical and mental disorders and perceived psychological support while in the hospitel, which is a close-ended question (yes or no); 3) the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale - 21 items (DASS-21); and 4) Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) would performed if participants had moderate to severe severity from DASS-21 score in any domains. In addition, we collected participants' data on day 1 and day 7 of admission by Google form.

DASS-21 consists of three domains; each domain comprises seven items, and the depression, anxiety, and stress scores are calculated by summing. Then, the severity of each part is categorised into normal, mild, moderate, severe and extremely severe. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the DASS-21 Thai version is 0.75 reflecting good internal consistency.¹⁰^,¹¹

PHQ-9 Thai version has a total of 9 depressive questions. The total score of PHQ-9 is classified into normal (0–6), mild (7–12), moderate (13–18), and severe (≥19). The sensitivity and specificity of PHQ-9 are 84% and 77%, respectively, to detect depression.¹²^,¹³

Statistical analyses

Data were analysed using SPSS software (version 28.0; IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). The prevalence of mental health problems was presented by frequency and percentage. McNemar's test was used to compare the prevalence of mental health problems between day 1 and day 7. In addition, binary logistic regression (odds ratio [OR] and 95% confidence interval [CI]) was used to identify potential predictors of depression, anxiety and stress. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Of 186 participants recruited in this study, they had a mean age of 37.21 years old (SD 13.66). The majority of participants were female (68.3%), single (54.8%), had an undergraduate degree (44.1%), employed (49.5%), and were living with family (59.7%) ( Table 1).

Table 1. Demographics of patients (N=186).

Variables	N	(%)
Age (years), Mean±SD	37.21±13.66
(Min-Max)	(18-75)
Sex
Male	59	(31.7)
Female	127	(68.3)
Race: Thai	184	(98.9)
Marital status
Single	102	(54.8)
Married	69	(37.1)
Divorced or Separated	11	(5.9)
Widow	4	(2.2)
Educational level
Lower than primary school	5	(2.7)
Primary school	25	(13.4)
Junior high school	44	(23.7)
Senior high school	15	(8.1)
Undergraduate university	82	(44.1)
Postgraduate university	15	(8.1)
Occupation
None	33	(17.7)
Government official	45	(24.2)
Self-employed	16	(8.6)
Employee	92	(49.5)
Income per month (Thai baht)
0-5,000	23	(12.4)
5,001-10,000	28	(15.1)
10,001-15,000	37	(19.9)
15,001-20,000	32	(17.2)
20,001-25,000	12	(6.5)
>25,000	54	(29.0)
Living status
Living alone	23	(12.4)
Living with friends	13	(7.0)
Living with a partner	39	(21.0)
Living with family	111	(59.7)
Family history of Mental disorder	9	(4.8)

Table 2 demonstrates the clinical characteristics of the patients. Approximately 16% of participants had at least one underlying medical illness. Only 1.1% of participants had an underlying mental disorder. In addition, around 80% of participants had mild COVID-19 symptoms, and the symptoms lasted at least 7 days. The median duration of hospitel admission was 12 days (IQR 10-13). Most participants were admitted alone (86.6%), and eventually, they could be discharged from the hospitel after 7 days of admission. Interestingly, around 90% of participants perceived that they were provided psychological support while in the hospitel.

Table 2. Clinical characteristics of patients (N=186).

Variables	N	(%)
Underlying medical disease	30	(16.1)
Diabetes mellitus	6	(3.2)
Hyperlipidaemia	10	(5.4)
Hypertension	20	(10.8)
Others	5	(2.7)
Underlying mental disorder	2	(1.1)
Depression	1	(0.5)
Anxiety	1	(0.5)
COVID-19 symptom
Asymptomatic	35	(18.8)
Mild	151	(81.2)
Duration with COVID-19
Asymptomatic	22	(11.8)
<7 days	35	(18.8)
≥7 days	129	(69.4)
Duration of hospitalisation (days)
Median (IQR)	0	(0-0)
(Min-Max)	(0-12)
Duration of hospitel admission (days)
Median (IQR)	12	(10-13)
(Min-Max)	(2-14)
Admission status
Alone	161	(86.6)
With family	25	(13.4)
Family members diagnosed COVID-19
Median (IQR)	1	(0-3)
(Min-Max)	(0-11)
Referring status
Discharge	164	(88.2)
Refer from hospital	19	(10.2)
Refer to hospital	3	(1.6)
Perceived psychological support
No	18	(9.7)
Yes	168	(90.3)

Regarding the prevalence of mental health problems ( Table 3), the depression, anxiety, and stress rates were 26.9%, 32.3% and 25.8%, respectively, on day 1 of hospitel admission. The most common level of depression measured by PHQ-9 was mild severity. However, after 7 days of admission, the depression, anxiety, and stress rates decreased to 18.3%, 17.2% and 12.9%, respectively. This difference in the proportion of mental health problems between day 1 and day 7 was statistically significant (P<0.05) ( Figure 1).

Table 3. Prevalence of mental health problems on day 1 and day 7 (N = 186).

Mental health problems	Day 1		Day 7		P-value^a
Mental health problems	N	(%)	N	(%)	P-value^a
Depression assessed by DASS-21
Normal	136	(73.1)	152	(81.7)	0.014*
Mild to severe	50	(26.9)	34	(18.3)
Anxiety
Normal	126	(67.7)	154	(82.8)	<0.001**
Mild to severe	60	(32.3)	32	(17.2)
Stress
Normal	138	(74.2)	162	(87.1)	<0.001**
Mild to severe	48	(25.8)	24	(12.9)
Depression assessed by PHQ-9, (n = 31)
Normal	15	(48.4)	-	-
Mild	12	(38.7)	-	-
Moderate	3	(9.7)	-	-
Severe	1	(3.2)	-	-

a McNemar's test.

* P<0.05.

** P<0.01.

Figure 1. Prevalence of mental health problems on day 1 and day 7.

The results of binary logistic regression analysis revealed that having mild COVID-19 symptoms was a significantly associated factor with anxiety (OR=2.69, 95%CI: 1.05-6.89) and stress (OR=4.53, 95%CI: 1.32-15.55). In contrast, other factors were not associated with depression, anxiety and stress (P>0.05) ( Table 4).

Table 4. Factors associated with mental health problems analysed by binary logistic regression.

Factors	Depression			Anxiety			Stress
Factors	OR	95%CI	P-value	OR	95%CI	P-value	OR	95%CI	P-value
Age (years)	1.00	(0.98-1.02)	0.928	1.00	(0.98-1.02)	0.923	0.98	(0.95-1.00)	0.081
Sex
Male	1.15	(0.58-2.30)	0.686	1.55	(0.81-2.97)	0.183	1.61	(0.81-3.19)	0.176
Female	1.00	Reference		1.00	Reference		1.00	Reference
Marital status
Single	1.00	Reference		1.00	Reference		1.00	Reference
Married	1.26	(0.63-2.50)	0.515	1.15	(0.60-2.20)	0.685	0.51	(0.24-1.07)	0.076
Widow/Divorced/Separated	1.54	(0.48-4.93)	0.467	1.53	(0.50-4.66)	0.457	1.60	(0.52-4.89)	0.410
Education level
Primary school or lower	1.37	(0.57-3.30)	0.489	1.02	(0.43-2.42)	0.972	0.94	(0.38-2.37)	0.900
High school	0.85	(0.40-1.80)	0.670	0.89	(0.44-1.79)	0.747	0.73	(0.34-1.57)	0.422
Undergraduate university or higher	1.00	Reference		1.00	Reference		1.00	Reference
Occupation
Government official	1.00	Reference		1.00	Reference		1.00	Reference
Self-employed/Employee	1.86	(0.78-4.45)	0.162	1.75	(0.80-3.83)	0.164	1.41	(0.62-3.19)	0.411
None	2.31	(0.81-6.63)	0.119	1.34	(0.49-3.68)	0.565	0.94	(0.32-2.81)	0.915
Income (baht)
0-15,000	1.24	(0.56-2.75)	0.600	1.17	(0.56-2.43)	0.679	0.90	(0.41-1.96)	0.782
15,001-25,000	1.81	(0.74-4.43)	0.193	1.23	(0.52-2.89)	0.637	1.20	(0.49-2.91)	0.690
>25,000	1.00	Reference		1.00	Reference		1.00	Reference
Living status
Living alone	0.57	(0.18-1.81)	0.338	0.49	(0.17-1.43)	0.193	0.60	(0.19-1.90)	0.380
Living with friends	1.69	(0.51-5.57)	0.390	1.52	(0.48-4.84)	0.477	1.77	(0.54-5.84)	0.350
Living with a partner	1.06	(0.47-2.39)	0.887	0.53	(0.23-1.23)	0.141	0.98	(0.42-2.25)	0.953
Living with family	1.00	Reference		1.00	Reference		1.00	Reference
Underlying medical disease	0.64	(0.24-1.66)	0.356	0.47	(0.18-1.23)	0.123	0.53	(0.19-1.46)	0.218
Underlying mental disorder	-	-	NA	-	-	NA	2.92	(0.18-47.53)	0.453
Family history of mental	2.28	(0.59-8.85)	0.234	2.77	(0.72-10.73)	0.140	2.42	(0.62-9.41)	0.203
COVID-19 symptom
Asymptomatic	1.00	Reference		1.00	Reference		1.00	Reference
Mild	2.55	(0.93-6.99)	0.069	2.69	(1.05-6.89)	0.039 *	4.53	(1.32-15.55)	0.03 *
Admission status
Alone	1.00	Reference		1.00	Reference		1.00	Reference
With family	1.65	(0.68-4.01)	0.272	1.48	(0.62-3.52)	0.375	0.90	(0.34-2.39)	0.824
Family members diagnosed with COVID-19	1.04	(0.90-1.20)	0.616	1.03	(0.89-1.18)	0.692	0.94	(0.80-1.11)	0.481
Perceived psychological support
No	2.40	(0.89-6.48)	0.084	1.38	(0.51-3.76)	0.528	1.12	(0.38-3.32)	0.841
Yes	1.00	Reference		1.00	Reference		1.00	Reference

* P<0.05.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the prevalence of mental health problems among patients with COVID-19 in the hospitel in Thailand. The prevalence of depression was 26.9%, anxiety was 32.3%, and stress was 25.8% in patients with asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 symptoms at day 1 of their stay at the hospitel under the Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital supervision. Compared to the meta-analysis study from multinational countries, including China, the United States, Japan, India, and Turkey, the depression and anxiety rates had a similar trend (27.6 % vs 26.9 for depression and 32.6% vs 32.3% for anxiety).² On the contrary, the stress rate in this study was relatively lower than in the study at the Thammasat University field hospital (30% vs 25.8%).³

Although we also used the DASS-21, the same questionnaire, the prevalence of stress in this study might have been lower since the study at the Thammasat University field hospital had more moderate to severe COVID-19 cases.³ In addition, the context of hospitels and field hospitals were different in many ways; for example, the privacy and facility of hospitels might be better than field hospitals.

The mental health problems rate declined significantly on day 7 of admission (P<0.05). The potential explanation may be that most patients can adjust to acute stress over time and with perceived psychological support.¹⁴^,¹⁵ Moreover, the medical team at the hospitel always provide basic psychoeducation via a leaflet and video clip about coping with stress.¹⁶ The high-risk cases of mental disorders would then be referred to psychologists or psychiatrists.

In this study, mild COVID-19 symptoms was the only factor associated with anxiety and stress. This could be a helpful predictor of psychological screening problems in patients admitted to hospitel. However, unlike prior studies, we could not find the association between the female gender, duration of hospitalisation, and a history of psychiatric disorders and mental health problems. This could be because there were few patients with psychiatric disorders in this study. Additionally, we did not collect data on the detail of the physical symptoms of COVID-19.

We are aware of some limitations of the present study. First, we can only indicate associated factors, not causal relationships, due to the descriptive design. Secondly, we included only asymptomatic and mild symptoms, which may not represent all COVID-19 patients. Finally, the mental health problems in this study were assessed by online self-reporting questionnaires, which could demonstrate only symptoms, not disorders and patients who could not use the internet were excluded. Thus, patients with high-risk mental disorders should be further evaluated by psychiatrists or clinical psychologists.

Future research should investigate the prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which could be occurred following COVID-19 as a traumatic stressor.¹⁷ In addition, psychological intervention to prevent stress-related illnesses or psychological distress¹⁸ should be performed.

Conclusions

The prevalence of mental health problems in COVID-19 patients was common, especially on the first day of admission. However, it declined on the 7th day after admission. In addition, having mild symptomatic COVID-19 infection was an associated factor with anxiety and stress. Therefore, detecting and managing mental health problems should be considered standard care for COVID-19 patients.

Data availability

Underlying data

figshare: Mental health problems of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic COVID-19 patients in hospitel in Thailand: A Cross-Sectional Study, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21108790.v1.¹⁹

This project contains the following extended data:

• Hospitel Data.sav (anonymised responses in spss)

Extended data

figshare: Mental health problems of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic COVID-19 patients in hospitel in Thailand: A Cross-Sectional Study, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21108790.v1.¹⁹

This project contains the following extended data:

• Demographic data record-Hospitel.docx (blank English copy of the demographic and clinical characteristics questionnaire used in this study)

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge all study participants and would like to thank Anucha Kamson for his assistance with the statistical analysis and Kwanpond Traivaranon for her assistance with data curation.

References

1. Tangcharoensathien V, Sachdev S, Viriyathorn S, et al.: Universal access to comprehensive COVID-19 services for everyone in Thailand. BMJ Glob. Health. 2022; 7(6): e009281. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
2. Liu X, Zhu M, Zhang R, et al.: Public mental health problems during COVID-19 pandemic: a large-scale meta-analysis of the evidence. Transl. Psychiatry. 2021; 11(1): 384. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
3. Lerthattasilp T, Kosulwit K, Phanasathit M, et al.: Psychological impacts on patients with COVID-19 in a Thai field hospital. Arch. Clin. Psychiatry. 2020; 47(6): 215–217. Publisher Full Text
4. Li J, Yang Z, Zhang J, et al.: The psychological symptoms of patients with mild symptoms of coronavirus disease (2019) in China: A cross-sectional study. J. Adv. Nurs. 2021; 77(4): 1813–1824. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
5. Ismael F, Bizario J, Battagin T, et al.: Post-infection depressive, anxiety and posttraumatic stress symptoms: A prospective cohort study in patients with mild COVID-19. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry. 2021; 111: 110341. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
6. Leung T, Chan A, Chan EW, et al.: Short- and potential long-term adverse health outcomes of COVID-19: a rapid review. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020; 9(1): 2190–2199. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
7. Jeong SJ, Chung WS, Sohn Y, et al.: Clinical characteristics and online mental health care of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with coronavirus disease 2019. PLoS One. 2020; 15(11): e0242130. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
8. von Elm E , Altman DG, Egger M, et al.: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2008; 61(4): 344–349. Publisher Full Text
9. Wayne WD: Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health sciences. 6th ed.New York: Wiley & Sons; 1995.
10. Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF: Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. 2nd. ed.Sydney: Psychology Foundation; 1995.
11. Oei TP, Sawang S, Goh YW, et al.: Using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21) across cultures. Int. J. Psychol. 2013; 48(6): 1018–1029. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
12. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB: The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2001; 16(9): 606–613. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
13. Lotrakul M, Sumrithe S, Saipanish R: Reliability and validity of the Thai version of the PHQ-9. BMC Psychiatry. 2008; 8: 46. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
14. Babić R, Babić M, Rastović P, et al.: Resilience in Health and Illness. Psychiatr. Danub. 2020; 32(Suppl 2): 226–232. PubMed Abstract
15. Lakey B, Orehek E, Hain KL, et al.: Enacted support's links to negative affect and perceived support are more consistent with theory when social influences are isolated from trait influences. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2010; 36(1): 132–142. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
16. Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, et al.: The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet (London, England). 2020; 395(10227): 912–920. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
17. Yuan K, Gong YM, Liu L, et al.: Prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder after infectious disease pandemics in the twenty-first century, including COVID-19: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Mol. Psychiatry. 2021; 26(9): 4982–4998. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
18. Life event, stress and illness: The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet. 395(10227): 912–920. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
19. Chinvararak C: Demegraphic data record-Hospitel.docx. figshare. Dataset.2022. Publisher Full Text

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 4

VERSION 4 PUBLISHED 22 Sep 2022

Author details Author details

¹ Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, 10300, Thailand

Pantri Kirdchok
Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Chayut Wonglertwisawakorn
Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Yingrat Naviganuntana
Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Nongnuch Polruamngern
Roles: Data Curation, Funding Acquisition, Project Administration, Resources

Chotiman Chinvararak
Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Competing interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information

This study received a grant from Navamindradhiraj University Research Fund.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Article Versions (4)

version 4

Revised

Published: 01 Apr 2025, 11:1089

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.125998.4

version 3

Revised

Published: 14 Mar 2025, 11:1089

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.125998.3

version 2

Revised

Published: 07 Oct 2022, 11:1089

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.125998.2

version 1

Published: 22 Sep 2022, 11:1089

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.125998.1

© 2025 Kerdcharoen N et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Download

Export To

metrics

	Views	Downloads
F1000Research	-	-
PubMed Central Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.	-	-

Citations

SEE MORE DETAILS

CITE

how to cite this article

Kerdcharoen N, Kirdchok P, Wonglertwisawakorn C et al. Mental health problems of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic COVID-19 patients in hospitel in Thailand: A cross-sectional study [version 4; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2025, 11:1089 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.125998.4)

NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

track

receive updates on this article

Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Version 2

VERSION 2

PUBLISHED 07 Oct 2022

Revised

Views

Reviewer Report 17 Jan 2023

Richard Mottershead, Ras Al Khaimah College of Nursing, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.139474.r159686

Thank you for allowing me to review your relevant and topical paper. The paper provides a useful insight into the impact of Covid-19 not only on the physical aspect but the mental health implications of the virus and wider pandemic fall-out.

The authors introduce a rich data stream that provides a useful insight into care in Thailand which can be then examined by researchers globally based on the methods and methodology set down within this article.

The recommendations of ensuring mental health care for those having been diagnosed with Covid-19 is an intervention which would provide holistic care for our communities and would benefit our wider national healthcare strategies.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: I am a researcher who is actively involved in health and social care and applied research for disenfranchised groups and areas of need within our society.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Views

Reviewer Report 10 Oct 2022

Sorawit Wainipitapong, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.139474.r152674

The authors responded to all suggestions with a satisfactory revision. Thank you for ... Continue reading

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Version 1

VERSION 1

PUBLISHED 22 Sep 2022

Views

Reviewer Report 26 Sep 2022

Sorawit Wainipitapong, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

Approved with Reservations

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.138366.r151293

Thank you for the opportunity to review this article. The report was well written and organized.

Hereby, please find my suggestion for this work to become better suitable for indexing:

Some general profiles

Thank you for the opportunity to review this article. The report was well written and organized.

Hereby, please find my suggestion for this work to become better suitable for indexing:

Some general profiles of study location, Vajira Hospital, should be stated. For example, is it located in the metropolitan, urbanized, or regional area? Readers would gain benefit for generalizability regarding mental health-related profiles and conditions.
Are previous mental disorders enrolled in the exclusion criteria?
How did the authors measure ‘perceived psychological support while in the hospitel’? Please clarify.
Please kindly check the psychometric properties of PHQ-9 Thai version. Because the categorized severity of depression and the cut-off score of two cited references are not similar, the authors are suggested to carefully use the interpretation of this screening tool and specify the cut-off score used in the study.
Table 1 – Does ‘income’ refer to ‘income per month’?
Table 2 – Should ‘asymptomatic’ in the ‘Duration with COVID-19’ section be placed in the proper position?
Figure 1 – P-value could also be shown in the figure for it was mentioned in the text.
Table 4 – Please check the indent used in the table (i.e. Widow/Divorced/Separated and Educational level).
Table 4 – Please check the spelling ‘P<0.0.’ in the end of the table.
Compared to the finding from another Thai field hospital, the authors might provide additional discussions regarding the location or uniqueness of the hospital besides the severity of COVID-19.

Congratulations to all authors. They have done great work and I enjoyed reading this manuscript a lot.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Psychiatry

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

CITE

Report a concern

Author Response 21 Oct 2022

Chotiman Chinvararak, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, 10300, Thailand

21 Oct 2022

Author Response

Thank you very much for your review. We will try to address all your comments and improve them in version 2 of this paper.

1. Vajira hospital is located in ... Continue reading Thank you very much for your review. We will try to address all your comments and improve them in version 2 of this paper.

1. Vajira hospital is located in Bangkok and is responsible for caring for COVID-19 patients, especially those from the Thonburi district.

2. We did not exclude participants with previous mental disorders. There were 2 participants with preexisting mental disorders (shown in Table 2).

3. We used close-ended question (yes or no) to measure perceived psychological support while in the hospitel. We will update this information in version 2 of this paper.

4. We used the classification of depression (PHQ-9 Thai version) following reference number 13.

5. Yes, it refers to income per month. We will add this detail in version 2 of this paper.

6. We will change the position of "asymptomatic" in version 2 of this paper.

7. We will demonstrate P-value in Figure 1.

8. We will check the indent used in Table 1.

9. We will correct this mistake. The phrase is P<0.05.

10. We will discuss this issue (location of the hospitel) in version 2 of this paper.
Thank you very much for your review. We will try to address all your comments and improve them in version 2 of this paper.

1. Vajira hospital is located in Bangkok and is responsible for caring for COVID-19 patients, especially those from the Thonburi district.

2. We did not exclude participants with previous mental disorders. There were 2 participants with preexisting mental disorders (shown in Table 2).

3. We used close-ended question (yes or no) to measure perceived psychological support while in the hospitel. We will update this information in version 2 of this paper.

4. We used the classification of depression (PHQ-9 Thai version) following reference number 13.

5. Yes, it refers to income per month. We will add this detail in version 2 of this paper.

6. We will change the position of "asymptomatic" in version 2 of this paper.

7. We will demonstrate P-value in Figure 1.

8. We will check the indent used in Table 1.

9. We will correct this mistake. The phrase is P<0.05.

10. We will discuss this issue (location of the hospitel) in version 2 of this paper.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
Report a concern
Respond or Comment

COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT

Author Response 21 Oct 2022

Chotiman Chinvararak, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, 10300, Thailand

21 Oct 2022

Author Response

Thank you very much for your review. We will try to address all your comments and improve them in version 2 of this paper.

1. Vajira hospital is located in ... Continue reading Thank you very much for your review. We will try to address all your comments and improve them in version 2 of this paper.

1. Vajira hospital is located in Bangkok and is responsible for caring for COVID-19 patients, especially those from the Thonburi district.

2. We did not exclude participants with previous mental disorders. There were 2 participants with preexisting mental disorders (shown in Table 2).

3. We used close-ended question (yes or no) to measure perceived psychological support while in the hospitel. We will update this information in version 2 of this paper.

4. We used the classification of depression (PHQ-9 Thai version) following reference number 13.

5. Yes, it refers to income per month. We will add this detail in version 2 of this paper.

6. We will change the position of "asymptomatic" in version 2 of this paper.

7. We will demonstrate P-value in Figure 1.

8. We will check the indent used in Table 1.

9. We will correct this mistake. The phrase is P<0.05.

10. We will discuss this issue (location of the hospitel) in version 2 of this paper.
Thank you very much for your review. We will try to address all your comments and improve them in version 2 of this paper.

1. Vajira hospital is located in Bangkok and is responsible for caring for COVID-19 patients, especially those from the Thonburi district.

2. We did not exclude participants with previous mental disorders. There were 2 participants with preexisting mental disorders (shown in Table 2).

3. We used close-ended question (yes or no) to measure perceived psychological support while in the hospitel. We will update this information in version 2 of this paper.

4. We used the classification of depression (PHQ-9 Thai version) following reference number 13.

5. Yes, it refers to income per month. We will add this detail in version 2 of this paper.

6. We will change the position of "asymptomatic" in version 2 of this paper.

7. We will demonstrate P-value in Figure 1.

8. We will check the indent used in Table 1.

9. We will correct this mistake. The phrase is P<0.05.

10. We will discuss this issue (location of the hospitel) in version 2 of this paper.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
Report a concern

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 4

VERSION 4 PUBLISHED 22 Sep 2022

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

	Invited Reviewers
	1	2
Version 4 (revision) 01 Apr 25
Version 3 (revision) 14 Mar 25
Version 2 (revision) 07 Oct 22	read	read
Version 1 22 Sep 22	read

Sorawit Wainipitapong, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
Richard Mottershead, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates

Comments on this article

All Comments(0)

Add a comment

Browse by related subjects

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

40 Views

17 Jan 2023 | for Version 2

Richard Mottershead, Ras Al Khaimah College of Nursing, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates

40 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

I am a researcher who is actively involved in health and social care and applied research for disenfranchised groups and areas of need within our society.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

18 Views

10 Oct 2022 | for Version 2

Sorawit Wainipitapong, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

18 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

The authors responded to all suggestions with a satisfactory revision. Thank you for revising according to my comments and I have no further queries or suggestions.

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Psychiatry

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

41 Views

26 Sep 2022 | for Version 1

Sorawit Wainipitapong, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

41 Views Cite this report Responses(1)

Approved With Reservations

Thank you for the opportunity to review this article. The report was well written and organized.

Hereby, please find my suggestion for this work to become better suitable for indexing:

Some general profiles of study location, Vajira Hospital, should be stated. For example, is it located in the metropolitan, urbanized, or regional area? Readers would gain benefit for generalizability regarding mental health-related profiles and conditions.
Are previous mental disorders enrolled in the exclusion criteria?
How did the authors measure ‘perceived psychological support while in the hospitel’? Please clarify.
Please kindly check the psychometric properties of PHQ-9 Thai version. Because the categorized severity of depression and the cut-off score of two cited references are not similar, the authors are suggested to carefully use the interpretation of this screening tool and specify the cut-off score used in the study.
Table 1 – Does ‘income’ refer to ‘income per month’?
Table 2 – Should ‘asymptomatic’ in the ‘Duration with COVID-19’ section be placed in the proper position?
Figure 1 – P-value could also be shown in the figure for it was mentioned in the text.
Table 4 – Please check the indent used in the table (i.e. Widow/Divorced/Separated and Educational level).
Table 4 – Please check the spelling ‘P<0.0.’ in the end of the table.
Compared to the finding from another Thai field hospital, the authors might provide additional discussions regarding the location or uniqueness of the hospital besides the severity of COVID-19.

Congratulations to all authors. They have done great work and I enjoyed reading this manuscript a lot.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Psychiatry

Respond to this report

Responses (1)

Author Response

21 Oct 2022

Chotiman Chinvararak, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, 10300, Thailand

Thank you very much for your review. We will try to address all your comments and improve them in version 2 of this paper.

1. Vajira hospital is located in Bangkok and is responsible for caring for COVID-19 patients, especially those from the Thonburi district.

2. We did not exclude participants with previous mental disorders. There were 2 participants with preexisting mental disorders (shown in Table 2).

3. We used close-ended question (yes or no) to measure perceived psychological support while in the hospitel. We will update this information in version 2 of this paper.

4. We used the classification of depression (PHQ-9 Thai version) following reference number 13.

5. Yes, it refers to income per month. We will add this detail in version 2 of this paper.

6. We will change the position of "asymptomatic" in version 2 of this paper.

7. We will demonstrate P-value in Figure 1.

8. We will check the indent used in Table 1.

9. We will correct this mistake. The phrase is P<0.05.

10. We will discuss this issue (location of the hospitel) in version 2 of this paper.

View more View less

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:

Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested

Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.

Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

[1] 1. Tangcharoensathien V, Sachdev S, Viriyathorn S, et al.: Universal access to comprehensive COVID-19 services for everyone in Thailand. BMJ Glob. Health. 2022; 7(6): e009281. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[2] 2. Liu X, Zhu M, Zhang R, et al.: Public mental health problems during COVID-19 pandemic: a large-scale meta-analysis of the evidence. Transl. Psychiatry. 2021; 11(1): 384. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[3] 3. Lerthattasilp T, Kosulwit K, Phanasathit M, et al.: Psychological impacts on patients with COVID-19 in a Thai field hospital. Arch. Clin. Psychiatry. 2020; 47(6): 215–217. Publisher Full Text

[4] 4. Li J, Yang Z, Zhang J, et al.: The psychological symptoms of patients with mild symptoms of coronavirus disease (2019) in China: A cross-sectional study. J. Adv. Nurs. 2021; 77(4): 1813–1824. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[5] 5. Ismael F, Bizario J, Battagin T, et al.: Post-infection depressive, anxiety and posttraumatic stress symptoms: A prospective cohort study in patients with mild COVID-19. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry. 2021; 111: 110341. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[6] 6. Leung T, Chan A, Chan EW, et al.: Short- and potential long-term adverse health outcomes of COVID-19: a rapid review. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020; 9(1): 2190–2199. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[7] 7. Jeong SJ, Chung WS, Sohn Y, et al.: Clinical characteristics and online mental health care of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with coronavirus disease 2019. PLoS One. 2020; 15(11): e0242130. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[8] 8. von Elm E , Altman DG, Egger M, et al.: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2008; 61(4): 344–349. Publisher Full Text

[9] 9. Wayne WD: Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health sciences. 6th ed.New York: Wiley & Sons; 1995.

[10] 10. Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF: Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. 2nd. ed.Sydney: Psychology Foundation; 1995.

[11] 11. Oei TP, Sawang S, Goh YW, et al.: Using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21) across cultures. Int. J. Psychol. 2013; 48(6): 1018–1029. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[12] 12. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB: The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2001; 16(9): 606–613. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[13] 13. Lotrakul M, Sumrithe S, Saipanish R: Reliability and validity of the Thai version of the PHQ-9. BMC Psychiatry. 2008; 8: 46. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[14] 14. Babić R, Babić M, Rastović P, et al.: Resilience in Health and Illness. Psychiatr. Danub. 2020; 32(Suppl 2): 226–232. PubMed Abstract

[15] 15. Lakey B, Orehek E, Hain KL, et al.: Enacted support's links to negative affect and perceived support are more consistent with theory when social influences are isolated from trait influences. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2010; 36(1): 132–142. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[16] 16. Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, et al.: The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet (London, England). 2020; 395(10227): 912–920. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[17] 17. Yuan K, Gong YM, Liu L, et al.: Prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder after infectious disease pandemics in the twenty-first century, including COVID-19: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Mol. Psychiatry. 2021; 26(9): 4982–4998. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[18] 18. Life event, stress and illness: The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet. 395(10227): 912–920. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[19] 19. Chinvararak C: Demegraphic data record-Hospitel.docx. figshare. Dataset.2022. Publisher Full Text

Mental health problems of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic COVID-19 patients in hospitel in Thailand: A cross-sectional study

Abstract

Keywords

Revised Amendments from Version 3

Introduction

Methods

Ethics and consent

Study design, setting and participants

Data collection

Statistical analyses

Results

Table 1. Demographics of patients (N=186).

Table 2. Clinical characteristics of patients (N=186).

Table 3. Prevalence of mental health problems on day 1 and day 7 (N = 186).

Figure 1. Prevalence of mental health problems on day 1 and day 7.

Table 4. Factors associated with mental health problems analysed by binary logistic regression.

Discussion

Conclusions

Data availability

Underlying data

Extended data

Acknowledgements

References

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

Comments on this article

Browse by related subjects

Competing Interests Policy

Stay Updated