ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article
Revised

Development and thermophysical analysis of binary eutectics phase change materials for solar drying application

[version 3; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
PUBLISHED 06 Aug 2025
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Energy gateway.

This article is included in the Uttaranchal University gateway.

This article is included in the International Conference on Clean Energy Systems and Technologies collection.

Abstract

Background

In the past 30–40 years, conflicts over limited conventional energy sources and the negative climate change caused by them have attracted researchers and analysts to new, clean, and green energy technologies. Thereby reducing the consumption of conventional fuel and the negative impact on the climate. The production of alternative energy in the form of thermal energy storage using phase change materials (PCMs) is one of the techniques that not only reduces the gap between the supply and demand of energy but also increases the stability of the energy supply. The tendency of PCMs to melt and solidify over a wide temperature range makes them more attractive for use in many applications. The effective and efficient storage of solar energy by PCM has the potential to significantly advance the use of renewable energy.

Methods

Organic non-paraffin compound beeswax (BW) mixed with other non-paraffin compounds stearic acid (SA), Palmitic acid (PA), Myristic acid (MA), and Lauric acid (LA) in different compositions with the help of magnetic stirrer at 50–60°C for 3–4 hours to prepare BWSA, BWPA, BWMA, and BWLA eutectic PCM.

Results

Prepared eutectics melt and solidify in the temperature range 36–56°C and with latent heat in the range of 155–211 kJ/Kg, and they are thermally Stable around 200-250 °C.

Conclusions

Due to suitable temperature and good latent heat storage range, it is a good choice as thermal energy storage, for solar drying applications.

Keywords

Eutectic, Phase change materials, Non-paraffins, Thermal energy storage, Solar dryer

Revised Amendments from Version 2

In this revised version (Version 2), significant modifications have been made based on the suggestions and comments provided by the reviewers. Key improvements include the addition of a comprehensive discussion on the selection and formulation of eutectic phase change materials (PCMs), focusing on various ratios of beeswax (BW) blended with fatty acids such as stearic acid (SA), palmitic acid (PA), myristic acid (MA), and lauric acid (LA). The rationale behind selecting specific combinations and proportions has been elaborated to highlight their influence on thermal properties. Detailed analysis of the Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) results has been incorporated, addressing both the phase change temperatures and enthalpies. The discussion section has been expanded to interpret the thermal behaviour and to provide a comparative assessment of the different PCM formulations. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) has been included to evaluate the thermal stability and degradation behaviour of the eutectic PCMs. Discussion on the application section has been added to demonstrate the potential uses of the developed eutectic PCMs in thermal energy storage systems.

To read any peer review reports and author responses for this article, follow the "read" links in the Open Peer Review table.

Introduction

Modern civilization has grown and developed mostly as a result of energy, which has always been important from the perspective of the development of the global economy. However, along with increased efficiency in the energy sector, significant barriers must also be overcome, including the creation of conventional energy sources, reducing the use of fossil-based fuels, as well as reducing greenhouse gas emissions i.e., CO2 (carbon dioxide), SOX (oxides of sulfur), CH4 (methane), NOX (nitrogen oxides).1 Researchers around the world have been looking for new technologies in the last 30–40 years that will reduce the use of fossil fuels and, lessen the detrimental effects that energy production has on the climate and environment. A practical way of using alternative energy is through energy storage, in addition to conserving energy, energy storage also improves the stability and quality of the energy supply and reduces the variation between supply and demand. One of the popular techniques of energy storage is thermal energy storage (TES), which can be classified as2: i) Latent heat storage and ii) sensible heat storage.

Latent heat storage is reliant on heat absorption or release phenomenon, during the phase transition of material from solid to liquid or liquid to gas or vice versa. These materials involved in phase transition are known as phase change materials (PCMs). Whereas in sensible heat storage, energy is stored by increasing the temperature of liquid or solid. In the charging and discharging process, a sensible heat storage system makes use of the material's heat capacity and temperature variation. Stored heat in materials depends on the amount of storage material, the specific heat of the medium, and the temperature change.3

Phase change materials (PCMs)

Due to applied thermal energy, some materials change their state by storing some amount of latent heat during the state/phase transition, such materials are known as PCMs. During the transition from solid to liquid or from liquid to solid, thermal energy is transferred. These solid-liquid PCMs function initially like traditional storage materials, as they absorb heat, their temperature increases, but release heat at a practically constant temperature, in contrast to conventional (sensible) storage materials.4 PCMs use chemical bonds for energy storage and release. Although in a sense every material is a PCM, the materials are only categorized as PCM if they have some characteristics of energy storage. High thermal conductivity and significant latent heat should be present in phase transition materials used for energy storage. Additionally, the materials melting points should be within a practical application range; materials should melt consistently with the least amount of supercooling and should be chemically stable. The materials should not be toxic, or chemically corrosive, and should be economical for practical applications.5 PCMs are often divided into three groups i.e., organic, inorganic, and eutectics, which is the combination of two or more materials.

Inorganic PCMs

This group of PCMs is divided into salt hydrates and metallics. Due to their low cost, better thermal conductivity, cost-effectiveness, and minor volumetric changes for storage, salt hydrates are very appealing materials for phase change energy storage. Salt hydrates are a typical crystalline solid that are a mixture of water (H2O) and inorganic salts and is written as AB.nH2O. Salt hydrates can change from a solid to a liquid state by dehydrating or hydrating the salt, even though this process thermodynamically mimics melting or freezing. Generally, a salt hydrate melts into water, and salt hydrate6 i.e.,

AB.nH2OAB.mH2O+nmH2O

And in anhydrous form

AB.nH2OAB+nH2O

Most salt hydrates have the problem of incongruent melting. The hydrate crystals disintegrate into anhydrous salt and water, or a lower hydrate and water, at the melting point. The fact that the water released during crystallization is insufficient to completely dissolve all of the solid phases present causes incongruent melting, which is one issue with the majority of salt hydrates. The lower hydrate (or anhydrous salt), due to the density difference, descends to the bottom of the container. Many salt hydrates also have weak nucleating capabilities, which causes the liquid to supercool before crystallization starts. The addition of a nucleating agent, which supplies the nuclei on which crystal formation is started, is one approach to solving this issue. Another option is to keep some crystals in a small, cold area so they can act as nuclei. Some of the salt hydrates with their latent heat of fusion and melting point are listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Thermo physical properties of salt hydrates.7

Salt hydratesMelting point (°C) Latent heat (kJ/kg)
Zn(NO3)2.2H2O55.068
FeCl3.2H2O56.090
K2HPO4.3H2O48.099
Ca(NO3)2.3H2O51.0104
FeBr36H2O21.0105
FeBr3.6H2O27.0105
K2HPO4.6H2O14.0109
Zn(NO3)2.4H2O45.0110
Mn(NO3)2.4H2O37.1115
LiBr2.2H2O34.0124
LiBr2.2H2O36.1134
Ca(NO3).4H2O47.0153
Fe(NO3)3.9H2O47.0155
Aluminum nitrate nonahydrate Al(NO3)2.9H2O72.0155
MgCl2.6H2O117.0167
CoSO47H2O40.7170
KFe(SO4)2.12H2O33.0173
CaCl2.12H2O29.8174
NaAl(SO4)2.10H2O61.0181
LiNO3.3H2O30.0189
FeCl3.6H2O37.0223
NaOH.H2O64.3273
LiNO3.2H2O30.0296

Most of the metal eutectics and low melting metals come under the inorganic metallic PCM category, but due to their heavy weight, metallics have not been given substantial consideration for PCMs. They are reasonable candidates when the volume is taken into account due to the high latent heat of fusion output per unit volume. The employment of metallics brings forth a variety of peculiar technical issues. The strong heat conductivity of the metallics distinguishes them significantly from other PCMs.8

Organic PCMs

Organic PCMs are divided into the paraffin and non-paraffin subgroups. Without any loss in their latent heat of fusion and phase segregation, these materials have the property of congruent melting i.e., repeatedly melting and freezing. It also exhibits the property of non-corrosiveness and self-nucleation.

Paraffin is mostly made up of an alkanes chain (CH3–CH2–CH3…), and the crystallization of these chains generates a significant amount of latent heat. In general, paraffin is stable below 500°C, and there are no significant changes in the volume on their melting; also they have low vapor pressure while melting.9 The melt-freeze cycle of paraffin is often relatively long. With more carbon atoms present, alkane has a higher melting point. The fact that paraffin is accessible in a wide range of temperatures is the primary factor in its qualification as an energy storage material. Along with other beneficial traits like consistent melting and good nucleating qualities, paraffin has several other advantages.10 They have a few unfavorable characteristics, including low thermal conductivity, incompatibility with plastic containers, and considerable flammability. By slightly modifying the wax and the storage unit, all these negative effects can be somewhat removed. Some of the most desirable and moderate desirable paraffin are shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Thermophysical properties of some paraffin compounds.11

Paraffin compoundsMelting point (°C) Latent heat of fusion (kJ/kg)
C145.50228.0
C1510.00205.0
C1616.70237.1
C1721.70213.0
C1828.00244.0
C1932.00222.0
C2036.70246.0
C2140.20200.0
C2244.00249.0
C2347.50232.0
C2450.60255.0
C2549.40238.0
C2656.30256.0
C2758.80236.0
C2861.60253.0
C2963.40240.0
C3065.40251.0
C3168.00242.0
C3269.50170.0
C3373.90268.0
C3475.90269.0

Of all phase transition materials, non-paraffin organics are the most prevalent and have the widest range of features.11 Unlike paraffin, which has extremely comparable properties, each of these materials will have unique characteristics. This is the broadest group of potential PCMs. After conducting a thorough analysis of organic materials, Buddhi and Sawhney found several esters, fatty acids, alcohols, and glycols that might be useful as energy storage materials.12 Fatty acids and other non-paraffin organic compounds are other subgroups of these organic molecules. Due to their flammability, fatty acids and non-paraffin organic materials cannot be subjected to extreme heat, flames, or oxidizing agents. Compared to paraffin, fatty acids have high heat of fusion and have repeatable behavior in their melting and freezing. Fatty acids also freeze without supercooling. All fatty acids are described by the chemical formula CH3(CH2)2n.COOH. Their main disadvantage is that they are 2–2.5 times more expensive than technical-grade paraffin. They are also barely corrosive. Some of the non-paraffin compounds are listed in Table 3 with their melting point and latent heat of fusion.

Table 3. Thermophysical properties of some non-paraffin compounds.11

Non-paraffins Melting point (°C) Latent heat (kJ/kg)
Polyethylene glycol 600 (H (OC2H2)n.OH) 20-25146.00
Capric acid (CH3(CH2)8.COOH) 36152.00
Palmatic acid (CH3(CH2)14.COOH) 55163.00
Lauric acid (CH3(CH2)10.COOH) 49178.00
Pentadecanoic acid (CH3(CH2)13.COOH) 49178.00
Acetic acid (CH3COOH) 16.70184.00
Tristearin ((C17H35COO)C3H5) 56191.00
Stearic acid (CH3(CH2)16.COOH) 69.40199.00
Myristic acid (CH3(CH2)12.COOH) 58199.00
Catechol104.30207.00
Trimyristin33-57201-213.00
Eladic acid (C8H7C9H16.COOH) 47218.00
Acetanilide118.90222.00
Methyl behenate52234.00
Acetamide (CH3CONH2) 81241.00
Methyl fumarate ((CHCO2NH3)2) 102242.00
Formic acid7.80247.00
Caprylone40259.00

Eutectic PCMs

A minimal-melting composition of at least two or more materials is known as a eutectic, and during crystallization, each of these materials melts and freezes concurrently to form a mixture of the material crystals.13 Because they freeze to a close-knit combination of crystals, eutectic materials rarely melt or freeze without the components segregating. Both components simultaneously liquefy when heated, making separation unlikely. Since they are minimum melting, some segregated PCM compositions have been wrongly referred to as eutectics. But it would be more accurate to refer to them as peritectic as they undergo a peritectic reaction during phase change. Some of the compositions of the eutectics are shown in Table 4.11

Table 4. Thermophysical properties of some eutectics.

Eutectics Composition (wt.%)Melting point (°C) Heat of fusion (kJ/kg)
Magnesium nitrate hexahydrate (Mg(NO3)3.6H2O) + Ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3)61.50 + 38.5052.00125.50
Magnesium nitrate hexahydrate (Mg(NO3)3.6H2O) + Magnesium chloride hexahydrate (MgCl2.6H2O)58.70 + 41.3059.00132.20
Triethylolethane (C5H12O3) + water (H2O) + urea (NH2CONH2)38.50 + 31.50 + 30.0013.40160.00
Magnesium nitrate hexahydrate (Mg(NO3)2.6H2O) + Magnesium bromide hexahydrate (MgBr2.6H2O)59.00 + 41.0066.00168.00
Sodium Acetate Trihydrate (CH3COONa.3H2O) + Urea (NH2CONH2)40.00 + 60.0030.00200.50
Triethylolethane (C5H12O3) + Urea (NH2CONH2)50.00 + 50.0065.00218.00
Acetamide (CH3CONH2) + Octadecanoic acid C17H35COOH50.00 + 50.0065.00218.00
Urea (NH2CONH2) + Ammonium bromide (NH4Br)66.60 + 33.4076.00151.00
Myristic acid (C14H28O2) + Decanoic acid (C10H20O2)34.00 + 66.0024.00147.70
Acetamide (CH3CONH2) + Urea (NH2CONH2)50.00 + 50.0027.00163.00
Magnesium nitrate hexahydrate (Mg(NO3)3.6H2O) + Al (NO3)2.9H2O53.00 + 47.0061.00148.00

Now, if there is a discussion on the merits and demerits of the three types of PCMs mentioned above (inorganic, organic, and eutectic), there are many discrepancies, some of which are listed in Table 5.

Table 5. Merit and demerits related to different types of PCMs.14

PCMs, Phase change materials.

PCMsMeritDemerit
Inorganic

  • Ease of availability

  • Economically feasible

  • Non-flammable

  • High thermal conductivity

  • High latent heat of fusion

  • Supercooling

  • Corrosive in nature

Organic

  • Wide temperature range

  • Chemically stable

  • Non-reactive

  • No supercooling

  • Non-hazardous

  • Flammable

  • Large volume change

  • Costly except technical grade paraffin

  • Low thermal conductivity

Eutectics

  • Sharp melting point

  • Large volumetric storage density

-

The rationale for mixing organic non-paraffin compounds such as beeswax (BW) with fatty acids like stearic acid (SA), palmitic acid (PA), myristic acid (MA), and lauric acid (LA) is to tailor the thermal properties particularly the melting point and latent heat of fusion of the resulting eutectic phase change materials (PCMs) for targeted thermal energy storage applications. Eutectic mixtures typically melt at temperatures lower than their individual components, enabling precise tuning of phase change behavior to the desired range of 50–60°C, suitable for applications such as solar water heating, building thermal management, and electronics cooling. Beeswax, a complex blend of long-chain esters, acids, and hydrocarbons, contributes high thermal stability and reduced subcooling, while the fatty acids offer chemical renewability and high latent heat but may suffer from issues like subcooling or phase separation. By carefully selecting compositions near the eutectic point such as BW:SA (20:80) or BW:PA (40:60) the mixtures form homogenous, stable PCMs that melt sharply and perform consistently over thermal cycles.

Other than the listed eutectic PCMs, many more eutectic mixtures were prepared with the good latent heat of fusion and melt-freeze cycle. In this series, beeswax-Stearic (BWSA), beeswax-Palmitic (BWPA), beeswax-Myristic (BWMA), and beeswax-Lauric (BWLA) are prepared and tested. These four prepared eutectic mixtures are a composition of organic non-paraffin PCMs.

Methods

Organic non-paraffin compound beeswax (BW) in different compositions mixed with another organic non-paraffin compound, Palmitic (PA), Myristic (MA), and Lauric (LA) acid at a temperature range of 50–60°C with the help of a magnetic stirrer at 200 rpm for 3–4 hrs followed by sonication for 15 minutes using Sonics Vibracell probe sonicator and get eutectic PCMs. Organic non-paraffin compounds are mixed in different compositions to get desired eutectics. A total of 20 wt % of BW mixed was with 80 wt % of SA to prepare BWSA28. Similarly, 40, 10, and 10 wt % of BW were mixed with 60, 90, and 90 wt % of PA, MA, and LA, respectively, to form BWPA46, BWMA19, and BWLA19 eutectic PCMs. Each sample is prepared in a quantity of 10 gm and acids SA, PA, MA, and LA used here were sourced from MOLYCHEM with product codes 19060, 16705, 16392, and 12520, respectively. Whereas BW was sourced from the center of Excellence on Honey Bees (Nalanda College of Horticulture, Nalanda, Bihar).

The PerkinElmer DSC 4000 equipment was used for the differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) study. In order to measure this little amount (mg) of the samples, an analytical digital weighing machine with a precision of 0.00001 g was used. The weighted sample between 10 to 15 mg was filled into an aluminium pan, and the DSC procedure was carried out in a nitrogen environment at a flux of 20 ml/min at a heating rate of 2°C/min. The accuracy of the DSC device was ±2% for enthalpy measurement and ± 0.1°C for temperature measurement. The reference pan and the sample pan are heated at the same rate during the DSC analysis. The latent heat of fusion, peak melting temperature, and other thermophysical parameters was measured. The top point of the curve offers the peak melting temperature, while the area that comes under the curve explicated latent heat of fusion and crystallization, and the tangent of the highest slope explicated the onset melting point.

Results

Eutectic phase change materials (PCMs) exhibit a distinct thermal transition behaviour upon heating, which is central to their thermal energy storage (TES) performance. When heat is applied, the molecules within the eutectic PCM begin to oscillate more vigorously. This increased molecular vibration leads to a greater intermolecular distance, resulting in an expansion in volume. As temperature continues to rise, the kinetic energy of the molecules increases significantly, causing the disruption of the supramolecular interactions such as hydrogen bonding or Van der Waals forcesthat stabilize the solid-state structure. This disruption facilitates the transformation from a well-ordered crystalline solid into a disordered liquid state at a specific temperature, known as the phase transition temperature. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) complements this understanding by tracking the material’s weight loss as a function of temperature, revealing the onset of thermal degradation, evaporation of volatile components, and thermal stability limits. It provides critical insights into whether the PCM maintains its integrity during heating cycles.

Thermogravimetric behavior of eutectic PCMs

The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) plot illustrates the thermal stability and decomposition behaviour of pure beeswax (BW) and its eutectic mixtures with stearic acid (SA), palmitic acid (PA), myristic acid (MA), and lauric acid (LA) over a temperature range from room temperature to 800 °C (shown in Figure 1). The weight percentage versus temperature profiles reveal distinct degradation patterns for each sample. Pure beeswax exhibits the highest thermal stability, with initial decomposition starting around 250 °C, major weight loss occurring between 250–450 °C, and near-complete decomposition by ~500 °C. This is attributed to the breakdown of long-chain hydrocarbons, esters, and waxy compounds present in BW. The BWSA28 sample begins degrading slightly earlier (~200 °C) and shows significant mass loss between 250–450 °C, continuing up to ~600 °C, indicating reduced stability compared to pure BW but better than pure SA, likely due to the inclusion of BW which stabilizes the blend. For BWPA46, BWMA19, and BWLA19, thermal stability decreases progressively with decreasing fatty acid chain length. BWLA19 exhibits the earliest degradation (~160 °C) and the fastest decomposition, completing by ~350 °C, highlighting its low thermal resistance due to the volatility and lower molecular weight of lauric acid. BWMA19 and BWPA46 show intermediate behaviour, with BWPA46 displaying a broader degradation range due to multistep decomposition from its mixed components. The thermal degradation proceeds via sequential breakdown of molecular constituents starting with volatilization of free fatty acids and followed by the cleavage of ester bonds and fragmentation of hydrocarbon backbones. These reactions are influenced by molecular weight, bonding type, and blend miscibility, where longer chains require higher activation energy to decompose compared to shorter ones. The near-zero residue at 800 °C confirms complete volatilization, which is advantageous for clean decomposition but may necessitate containment considerations in cyclic TES operations. All eutectic mixtures leave minimal residue (~0–5%) at 800 °C, indicating complete decomposition. The observed mass losses are primarily due to thermal evaporation and breakdown of organic constituent’s fatty acids and hydrocarbon chains into volatile products. These results confirm that beeswax improves thermal stability in eutectic formulations, and the degradation temperature systematically decreases with shorter fatty acid chain lengths. This information is essential for selecting eutectic phase change materials (PCMs) in thermal energy storage systems where both thermal stability and phase transition behaviour are crucial.

371bc17a-acea-4da3-b4f5-9eeff7f18f77_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves of pure beeswax (BW) and its eutectic mixtures with stearic acid (BWSA28), palmitic acid (BWPA46), myristic acid (BWMA19), and lauric acid (BWLA19).

Through DSC analysis, the thermal energy storage properties of BWSA28, BWPA46, BWMA19, and BWLA19 were determined. The DSC curves for BWSA28, BWPA46, BWMA19, and BWLA19 are shown in Figure 2. The DSC curves for BWSA28, BWPA46, BWMA19, and BWLA19 displayed comparable patterns and nearly equal forms. For BWSA28, BWPA46, BWMA19, and BWLA19, the onset melting points were 49.59°C, 48.85°C, 50.91°C, and 41.02°C, respectively, which are listed in Table 6. Similarly, the peak melting temperatures for these materials were 55.17°C, 56.85°C, 55.22°C, and 44.96°C, respectively. These values suggest that the materials begin to undergo phase transition within a relatively narrow and moderate temperature range, making them suitable for low-to-intermediate temperature thermal storage applications. Onset and freezing temperatures obtained from BWSA28, BWPA46, BWMA19, and BWLA19 were 50.79°C, 50.22°C, 45.44°C, 36.77°C, and 48.93°C, 49.59°C, 45.34°C, 36.08°C, respectively. The relatively small supercooling gap between the melting and freezing temperatures across all samples suggests good reversibility and stability in repeated thermal cycling, a critical requirement for TES materials. In the DSC plot, the area under the curve provides latent heat of fusion and latent heat of crystallization as shown in Figure 2 and marked with the arrow. So, the obtained latent heat of fusion and latent heat of crystallization for BWSA28, BWPA46, BWMA19, and BWLA19 were 174.52 kJ/kg, 166.03 kJ/kg, 192.85 kJ/kg, 195.73 kJ/kg, and 177.94 kJ/kg, 155.55 kJ/kg, 211.52 kJ/kg, and 201.04 kJ/kg, respectively. These results indicate that BWMA19 and BWLA19 possess superior thermal storage capacity, making them especially attractive for applications requiring higher energy density. DSC analysis confirms that all four eutectic PCMs possess favorable thermal properties, including sharp phase transition, moderate-to-high latent heat, and low supercooling. Among them, BWMA19 and BWLA19 demonstrate the most promising performance due to their higher latent heat values, making them strong candidates for efficient thermal energy storage in solar thermal systems, building climate control, or electronic cooling applications.

371bc17a-acea-4da3-b4f5-9eeff7f18f77_figure2.gif

Figure 2. DSC curve of BWSA28, BWPA46, BWMA19, and BWLA19.

DSC, differential scanning calorimetry; BWSA, Beeswax-Stearic; BWPA, Beeswax-Palmitic; BWMA, Beeswax-Myristic; BWLA, Beeswax-Lauric.

Table 6. Thermophysical properties of prepared eutectic PCMs.

PCMs, Phase change materials; BWSA, Beeswax-Stearic; BWPA, Beeswax-Palmitic; BWMA, Beeswax-Myristic; BWLA, Beeswax-Lauric.

Eutectic PCMsMelting temperature (°C) Latent heat of fusion (kJ/kg)Freezing temperature (°C)Latent heat of crystallization (kJ/kg)
OnsetPeakOnset Peak
BWSA28 49.5955.17174.5250.7948.93177.94
BWPA46 48.8556.85166.0350.2249.59155.55
BWMA19 50.9155.22192.8545.4445.34211.52
BWLA19 41.0244.96195.7336.7736.08201.04

Discussion

Application

Drying is a widely used technique in the preservation of food and agricultural products, primarily employed to reduce moisture content while maintaining the quality, nutritional value, and shelf life of the products. Among various drying techniques, solar drying has emerged as a cost-effective and environmentally friendly alternative, particularly well-suited for rural and off-grid regions. The operating temperature range typically required for drying sensitive agricultural products such as fruits and vegetables lies between 40°C and 80°C, a range that ensures adequate moisture removal without causing thermal degradation of essential nutrients. Effective solar drying requires stable temperature regulation and moisture control, which are heavily influenced by ambient solar radiation, air temperature, humidity, and airflow. To address the challenge of fluctuating environmental conditions during solar drying, phase change materials (PCMs) can be integrated into drying systems to store thermal energy during peak sunlight hours and release it when solar input diminishes (e.g., late afternoon or cloudy periods). This enhances drying consistency, improves energy efficiency, and reduces the risk of spoilage.1517 The eutectic PCMs developed in this study BWSA28, BWPA46, BWMA19, and BWLA19 exhibited melting and freezing temperatures in the range of 36°C to 56°C, aligning well with the optimal temperature window for solar drying of food and agricultural products. Specifically, BWLA19, with a melting temperature around 44.96°C and a freezing point near 36.08°C, is particularly well suited for low-temperature drying applications where gentle heat is necessary to preserve delicate nutritional compounds. BWMA19 and BWSA28, having melting temperatures of 55.22°C and 55.17°C respectively, can support drying processes that require temperatures closer to the upper end of the safe drying range. The high latent heat capacities of these eutectics (up to 195.73 kJ/kg for BWLA19 and 192.85 kJ/kg for BWMA19) indicate that they can store and release substantial amounts of thermal energy, thus extending the effective drying period beyond peak sunlight hours. In addition to technical compatibility, the use of PCMs in solar drying systems contributes to energy conservation and sustainability. Unlike fossil-fuel-based thermal storage or continuous electrical input, eutectic PCMs offer passive energy storage with no carbon emissions, aligning with ecological and economic goals of the agricultural industry. Thus, the integration of these eutectic PCMs into solar-assisted drying units could significantly enhance the efficiency, reliability, and product quality of food drying processes, while maintaining a low operational cost and minimizing environmental impact. Compared to commercial PCMs, the thermal storage capacity of BWMA19 and BWLA19 (>190 kJ/kg) is comparable or superior to RT50 and fatty acid eutectics.18 Phase transition temperatures are finely tuned for different drying needs BWLA19 for more sensitive drying (e.g., herbs, berries), and BWMA19 for general fruits/vegetables. These eutectics likely offer better chemical compatibility, biodegradability, and cost-effectiveness for agricultural use, depending on the specific constituents. Moreover, the narrow supercooling range and consistent melting/crystallization behaviour observed in the DSC curves indicate that these PCMs maintain reversible thermal cycling with minimal thermal hysteresis, enhancing their reliability for repeated drying operations.19,20

Conclusions

Due to its capability to enhance system performance, energy storage is particularly alluring to a wide range of parties. Technology development is more efficient and practical when excess energy is stored for later use rather than being replaced by new power plants. The latent heat of the phase change is associated with prepared eutectic PCMs and has a crucial influence on their ability to store greater amounts of energy. A target-oriented settling temperature is also supported by PCMs due to the fixed phase change temperature. This paper deals with the development of eutectics PCM. The foremost advantages of these prepared eutectic PCMs were their low cost and eco-friendly nature. DSC analysis of this prepared eutectics BWSA28, BWPA46, BWMA19, and BWLA19 showed good thermal energy storage capacity, and it lies between 155–211 kJ/Kg and they are thermally stable around 200–250°C. These eutectics have a temperature range between 36–56°C.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 3
VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 09 Nov 2022
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Pandey S, Anand A, Buddhi D and Sharma A. Development and thermophysical analysis of binary eutectics phase change materials for solar drying application [version 3; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2025, 11:1277 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.127268.3)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 3
VERSION 3
PUBLISHED 06 Aug 2025
Revised
Views
6
Cite
Reviewer Report 19 Aug 2025
Deepika P. Joshi, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar,, Uttrakhand, India 
Not Approved
VIEWS 6
The revised manuscript entitled “Development and thermophysical analysis of binary eutectics phase change materials for solar drying application” has again some issues which are not clear; some points are as follows:
Comments:
  • Beewax PCM was
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
P. Joshi D. Reviewer Report For: Development and thermophysical analysis of binary eutectics phase change materials for solar drying application [version 3; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2025, 11:1277 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.183569.r403164)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Version 2
VERSION 2
PUBLISHED 20 Sep 2023
Revised
Views
17
Cite
Reviewer Report 30 Dec 2024
Abuelnuor Abdeen Ali Abuelnuor, Al-Baha University, Al-Baha, Saudi Arabia 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 17
  • Was the choice of specific compositions for BW, PA, MA, and LA (e.g., 20:80 for BWSA28) based on prior experimental optimization or theoretical predictions? Could alternative ratios yield better eutectic properties, and were these tested?
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Abdeen Ali Abuelnuor A. Reviewer Report For: Development and thermophysical analysis of binary eutectics phase change materials for solar drying application [version 3; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2025, 11:1277 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.151630.r337593)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
22
Cite
Reviewer Report 24 Dec 2024
Deepika P. Joshi, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar,, Uttrakhand, India 
Not Approved
VIEWS 22
Reviewer Report
            The manuscript presents a study on “Development and thermophysical analysis of binary eutectics phase change materials for solar drying application ” Summary of the work:
In the Manuscript,
  • Non-paraffin organic PCM
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
P. Joshi D. Reviewer Report For: Development and thermophysical analysis of binary eutectics phase change materials for solar drying application [version 3; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2025, 11:1277 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.151630.r346917)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 3
VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 09 Nov 2022
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.