Effect of <i>Aloe vera</i> extract in post-burn skin repair in rats

Lusiana Aulia; Yunita Sari Pane

doi:10.12688/f1000research.79538.3

Home Browse Effect of Aloe vera extract in post-burn skin repair in rats

ALL Metrics

Views

Downloads

Get PDF

Get XML

Export

▬

✚

Research Article

Revised

Effect of Aloe vera extract in post-burn skin repair in rats

[version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 1 not approved]

Lusiana Aulia¹, Yunita Sari Pane ²

PUBLISHED 28 Feb 2023

Author details Author details

¹ Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, North Sumatera, 20155, Indonesia
² Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara Jl. Dr. Mansyur, No.5, Medan 20155, Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

Lusiana Aulia
Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Yunita Sari Pane
Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

OPEN PEER REVIEW

REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Plant Science gateway.

Abstract

Background: Burn injury is a global health problem that is most often caused by heat. Burn injury can cause high morbidity and mortality and requires high cost. Therefore, the use of plants as herbal medicine has the potential to be developed in Indonesia. Aloe vera contains various active ingredients that help the wound healing process, such as glucomannan and acemannan which have the effects on the proliferation of macrophages, and fibroblasts, and re-epithelialization. This study aimed to determine the effect of Aloe vera extract in repairing post-burn skin in rats that was analyzed from the number of macrophages and fibroblasts, and epidermal thickness.

Methods: This is an experimental study with a posttest-only control group design using 54 Rattus norvegicus Wistar strain rats. The sampling method was simple random sampling consisting of 3 groups, i.e., I. standard group, which were normal rats; II. negative control group, which were given second-degree burns and treated with gel base (without Aloe vera extract); III. treatment groups, which were given second-degree burns and treated with Aloe vera extract gel. Each group was subdivided into three smaller groups (n = 6) according to the time the lesions were evaluated. Skin tissue samplings were carried out on day 3, 14, and 21 after injury to observe the number of macrophages and fibroblasts, and epidermal thickness.

Results: There were significant differences in the mean number of macrophages, number of fibroblasts, and epidermal thickness in all groups (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Aloe vera extract gel could accelerate the healing process of burns in rats.

Keywords

burn injury, Aloe vera, macrophages, fibroblasts, epidermal thickness

Corresponding author: Yunita Sari Pane

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Copyright: © 2023 Aulia L and Pane YS. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite: Aulia L and Pane YS. Effect of Aloe vera extract in post-burn skin repair in rats [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2023, 11:168 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.79538.3) First published: 11 Feb 2022, 11:168 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.79538.1) Latest published: 28 Feb 2023, 11:168 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.79538.3)

Revised Amendments from Version 2

In Version 2 we have improved the conclusions in the manuscript by adding information that from the results of the study. It was found that aloe vera extract accelerated the healing process of burns on group-III compared to the untreatment group (group-II). We had added information about the limitations of this study, also table 1 and its description.

See the authors' detailed response to the review by Reza Vaghardoost
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Fatima Ali
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Gusbakti Rusip

Introduction

Burn injury is damage to the skin or other tissues that can be caused by heat, radiation, electricity, chemicals, or friction, the most often caused by heat (American Burn Association, 2019). Burn injury that is due to heat consists of three causes, which are burns due to hot liquids (scalds), flames (flame burns), or hot solids (contact burns) (World Health Organization, 2018). A burn injury can be divided into four degrees based on its depth. A first-degree burn is limited to the epidermis. Second-degree burns involve both epidermis and dermis. Third-degree burns involve epidermis, dermis, and dermal appendages. Lastly, fourth-degree burns can penetrate into subdermal fat, underlying fascia, muscle, and/or bone (ABA, 2018).

Burn injury can cause high morbidity and mortality and its treatment requires a high cost. This is because of the long-term outpatient care, such as dressing changes and some even require surgical reconstruction (Smolle et al., 2017). WHO stated that around 180,000 deaths every year are caused by burns and the majority occur in lower-middle-income countries due to a lack of adequate facilities to reduce the incidence of burns (Menkes, 2019; WHO, 2018). According to the data from “Riset Kesehatan Dasar” RISKESDAS (Basic Health Research, Indonesia) in 2018, the proportion of burn injury in Sumatera Utara was 1% and based on the medical record data from Haji Adam Malik Hospital in Medan, North Sumatra-Indonesia, there were 353 cases of burns in 2011–2014 (Maulana, 2014).

There are three phases of wound healing, namely the inflammatory, proliferative, and remodeling phases. The inflammatory phase is characterized by the migration of leucocytes such as macrophages to the burn site to degrade debris or microbes. Next is the proliferative phase where the process of angiogenesis, re-epithelialization, and fibroblast proliferation occurs. Lastly, the remodeling phase is characterized by collagen remodeling, wound contraction, and decreased blood flow (Reinke & Sorg, 2012).

Several studies have shown that the use of silver sulfadiazine drug can cause side effects such as leukopenia and renal toxicity (Chaby et al., 2005; Fuller & Engler, 1988). Therefore, alternative treatments such as the use of herbal medicine are relatively safer. Several medical plants grow in Indonesia due to favorable tropical natural conditions. The information about these herbs is passed down from one generation to another, and they are commonly used in traditional medicine, forming an integral part of Indonesian cultural heritage (Gazali et al., 2013). One of the herbs that can be used for the treatment of burns is Aloe vera. The active chemical constituents found in Aloe vera such as glucomannan and acemannan can stimulate the activity and proliferation of fibroblasts. Acemannan can also increase the number of macrophages and stimulates fibroblast to produce keratinocyte growth factor-1 (KGF-1) for re-epithelialization process (Jettanacheawchankit et al., 2009; Sierra-García et al., 2014; Surjushe et al., 2008). This study aimed to determine the effect of Aloe vera extract in repairing post-burn skin in rats that were analyzed from the number of macrophages, fibroblasts, and epidermal thickness.

Methods

This is an experimental study in an animal burn model with a posttest-only control group design. This study is reported in lines with the in-vivo Animal Research: Reporting guidelines ARRIVE.

Ethics

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Universitas Sumatera Utara (No. 711/KEP/USU/2021). This study was conducted at the Pharmacology Laboratory of the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara.

Experimental animal

Healthy male Wistar strain rats, 10–12 weeks old, weighing 150–200 g were purchased from the Department of Biology of Mathematics and Scientific Faculty, Universitas Sumatera Utara. Before starting the experiment, the animals were adapted for 7 days. Of all rats, then every three rats were put into one cage with a size 55 × 40 × 27 cm (National Centre for Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animal in Research strongly recommended height of the cage is 26-30 cm) and covered with fine wire mesh; the base of cages was covered with rice husks as thick as 0.5-1 cm and replaced every day during the study. They were kept in 12 hours of daylight (06:00 A.M. – 06.00 P.M.) and 12 hours of dark cycle (06:00 P.M. – 06.00 A.M.) and fed with standard feed (CP 551 from PT Charoen Pokphand-Indonesia) and water was given ad libitum. They were kept in cages that were maintained at room temperature and humidity at normal ranges.

Allocation and treatment groups

All animals were randomly divided into three big groups by simple random sampling. Group I (standard) consisted of normal rats, group II (negative control) was inflicted with a burn wound and treated with gel base, and group III (treatment group) was inflicted with a burn wound and treated with Aloe vera gel. Each group was subdivided into three smaller groups (n = 6 per group) according to the time when the lesions were evaluated. They were treated twice a day according to the groups.

The sample size was calculated according to Federer’s formula: (Federer, 1963)

(t - 1) (n - 1) \geq 15

t = the number of groups

n = the number of samples

n = 2.875 ≈ 3 rat/group

Considering the NC3Rs principal in experimental animal, statistical analysis necessity, and the possibility of drop out, the number of rats per group were determined to be six. All 54 rats were given a number (1–54) using a marker pen, then randomized by putting the numbers in an envelope and dividing them into 9 groups, according to the numbers taken from the envelope (Russell and Burch, 1992).

Wound infliction

To ensure that the rats remain in a comfortable condition, they were given anesthesia before performing the burn. The animals have anesthetized with Ketamine/Xylazine 0.2 mL by intraperitoneal injection (in accordance with the provisions of Vertebrate Animal Research). The hair at the dorsal region was shaved and cleansed with alcohol swab. Second-degree burn wound was inflicted using iron plate measuring 2×2 cm² which was warmed in boiling water for 5 minutes and placed for 30 seconds on the shaved area (Kristyaningsih, 2016).

Aloe vera extract

About 2000 g of Aloe vera leaves were collected. The bottom part and the serrated edges of Aloe vera leaves were cut and peeled to obtain the inner clear gel. About 1000 g of inner gel was weighed and washed thoroughly and cut it into small pieces. Then, the small pieces of gel and 2000 mL 70% ethanol were blended and poured into a closed container (stirred occasionally for 6 hours, then set aside for 18 hours). This mixture was then filtered to obtain the filtrate (I). The extraction process was repeated on the residue using 1000 mL of 70% ethanol to obtain another filtrate (II). The filtrate (I) and (II) were mixed and evaporated using a vacuum rotary evaporator (Heidolph Instruments GmbH & Co. KG, Germany) at 40⁰C to obtain a thick extract.

Gel preparation

• Gel base
About 400 cc of distilled water was taken into the mortar, then 12 g of 3% Sodium-Carboxymethyl cellulose (Na-CMC) powder was evenly added. It was closed and set it aside for 15 minutes. After which it was ground and 4 g of 1% glycerin was added until a homogeneous gel base was formed.
• Aloe vera gel
Put 40 g of Aloe vera extract into the mortar then add 360 g of gel base gradually while grinding it until homogeneous. So, the concentration of the aloe vera contained 10% of the total weight of the gel.

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining

Six animals of each groups were sacrificed on the 3^rd, 14^th, and 21^st days after injury by injecting 100 mg/kg ketamine intraperitoneally. Then, the injured tissues were carefully dissected and fixed with 10% formalin. All samples were taken to Anatomic Pathology Laboratory of the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara for H&E staining. The number of macrophages and fibroblasts, and epidermal thickness was evaluated using Olympus CX21 light microscope with 400× magnification and three fields of view.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20 (RRID:SCR_019096) with one-way ANOVA test. If there were significant differences (p<0.05), then LSD test was conducted to determine the differences among groups. Data were presented as mean ± SD.

Results

The results obtained from the study are shown in Figures 1−3. The comparison of the changes in the thickness of the epidermis that occurs is shown in Figure 4. The explanation of the histopathological images obtained for macrophages, fibroblasts, and epidermal thickness is shown in Figure 5. From the one-way ANOVA results, there were significant differences in the mean number of macrophages and fibroblasts, and epidermal thickness in all groups (p<0.05). Then, the least Significant Difference (LSD) test was conducted to determine the differences among groups.

Figure 1. Mean number of macrophages.

I (standard), II (negative control), III (treatment). *p<0.05 statistically analysis by ANOVA showed significant difference.

Figure 2. Mean number of fibroblasts

I (standard), II (negative control), III (treatment)

*p<0.05 statistically analysis by ANOVA showed significant difference.

Figure 3. Mean number of epidermal thickness.

I (standard), II (negative control), III (treatment). *p<0.05 statistically analysis by ANOVA showed significant difference.

Figure 4. There was a change in epidermal thickness on days 3, 14 and 21.

The thickest epidermal layer was found in group III (treatment, aloe vera) compared to group II (negative control). This could be due to the fact that aloe vera gel was better in the wound repair process than the other groups. The thickness of the epidermis in groups II and III was also thicker than in the control group. This can happen because there is still a wound repair process in groups II and III.

Figure 5. The histopathological description of macrophages () fibroblast () and epidermal thickness ().

On the 3^rd day after injury, the highest mean number of macrophages were seen in the treatment group (III), followed by the negative control group (II), and followed by the standard group (I). From the post hoc test results, it appeared that there were significant differences in the mean number of macrophages (p<0.05) in groups I-3 vs II-3 (0.50 ± 0.45 vs 7.77 ± 0.62; p=0.0001), group I-3 vs III-3 (0.50 ± 0.45 vs 9.00 ± 0.47; p=0.0001), and group II-3 vs III-3 (7.77 ± 0.62 vs 9.00 ± 0.47; p=0.001) (see Figure 1).

On the 14^th day after injury, the highest mean number of macrophages were seen in the negative control group (II), followed by the treatment group (III), and followed by the standard group (I). From the post hoc test results, it appeared that there were significant differences in the mean number of macrophages (p<0.05) in groups I-14 vs II-14 (0.61 ± 0.39 vs 6.22 ± 0.98; p=0.0001), group I-14 vs. III-14 (0.61 ± 0.39 vs. 5.33 ± 0.42; p=0.0001), and group II-14 vs. III-14 (6.22 ± 0.98 vs 5.33 ± 0.42; p=0.013) (see Figure 1).

On day 21^st day after injury, the highest mean number of macrophages were seen in the negative control group (II), followed by the treatment group (III), and followed by the standard group (I). From the post hoc test results, it appeared that there were significant differences in the mean number of macrophages (p<0.05) in groups I-21 vs II-21 (0.55 ± 0.40 vs 4.72 ± 0.87; p=0.0001), group I-21 vs III-21 (0.55 ± 0.40 vs 3.16 ± 0.34; p=0.0001), and group II-14 vs III-14 (6.22 ± 0.98 vs 3.16 ± 0.34; p=0.0001) (see Figure 1).

On the 3^rd day after injury, the highest mean number of fibroblasts were seen in the treatment group (III), followed by the negative control group (II), and followed by the standard group (I). From the post hoc test results, it appeared that there were significant differences in the mean number of fibroblasts (p<0.05) in groups I-3 vs II-3 (3.77 ± 0.34 vs. 4.61 ± 0.49; p=0.047), group I-3 vs III-3 (3.77 ± 0.34 vs 6.44 ± 0.74; p=0.0001), and group II-3 vs III-3 (4.61 ± 0.49 vs 6.44 ± 0.74; p=0.0001) (see Figure 2).

On the 14^th day after injury, the highest mean number of fibroblasts were seen in the treatment group (III), followed by the negative control group (II), and followed by the standard group (I). From the post hoc test results, it appeared that there were significant differences in the mean number of fibroblasts (p<0.05) in groups I-14 vs II-14 (3.94 ± 0.38 vs 8.11 ± 0.68; p=0.0001), group I-14 vs III-14 (3.94 ± 0.38 vs 21.55 ± 1.02; p=0.0001), and group II-14 vs III-14 (8.11 ± 0.68 vs 21.55 ± 1.02; p=0.0001) (see Figure 2).

On the 21^st day after injury, the highest mean number of fibroblasts were seen in the negative control group (II), followed by the treatment group (III), and followed by the standard group (I). From the post hoc test results, it appeared that there were significant differences in the mean number of fibroblasts (p<0.05) in groups I-21 vs II-21 (3.72 ± 0.38 vs 9.05 ± 0.80; p=0.0001), group I-21 vs III-21 (3.72 ± 0.38 vs 6.66 ± 1.05; p=0.0001), and group II-21 vs III-21 (9.05 ± 0.80 vs 6.66 ± 1.05; p=0.0001) (see Figure 2).

On the 3^rd day after injury, the mean epidermal thickness was highest in the standard group (I), followed by the treatment group (III), and followed by the negative control group (II). From the post hoc test results, it appeared that there were significant differences in the mean epidermal thickness (p<0.05) in groups I-3 vs II-3 (5.88 ± 0.76 vs 2.43 ± 0.45; p=0.0001), group II-3 vs III-3 (2.43 ± 0.45 vs 5.15 ± 0.36; p=0.0001), while group I-3 vs. III-3 (5.88 ± 0.76 vs 5.15 ± 0.36; p=0.182) did not show a significant result (see Figure 3).

On the 14^th day after injury, the mean epidermal thickness was highest in the treatment group (III), followed by the negative control group (II), and followed by the standard group (I). From the post hoc test results, it appeared that there were significant differences in the mean epidermal thickness (p<0.05) in groups I-14 vs II-14 (6.01 ± 0.54 vs 11.46 ± 0.92; p=0.0001), group I-14 vs III-14 (6.01 ± 0.54 vs 16.75 ± 1.31; p=0.0001), and group II-14 vs III-14 (11.46 ± 0.92 vs 16.75 ± 1.31; p=0.0001) (see Figure 3).

On the 21^st day after injury, the mean epidermal thickness was highest in the treatment group (III), followed by the negative control group (II), and followed by the standard group (I). From the post hoc test results, it appeared that there were significant differences in the mean epidermal thickness (p<0.05) in groups I-21 vs II-21 (5.92 ± 0.68 vs 23.10 ± 1.37; p=0.0001), group I-21 vs III-21 (5.92 ± 0.68 vs 30.47 ± 1.25; p=0.0001), and group II-21 vs III-21 (23.10 ± 1.37 vs 30.47 ± 1.25; p=0.0001) (see Figure 3).

On Table 1 showed in group - III (treatment) wound repair was better than without aloe vera administration (group - II, negative control). In group - II,on day 14, the area of the wound still did not seem to shrink compared to group - III, on day 14. Meanwhile, on day 21, it was seen in group - III that hair had started to grow and the wound had dried up (Table 1).

Table 1. Pictures in Table 1 shows the healing process of burns on day-3,-14 and -21.

Groups	Day-3	Day-14	Day-21
Group-I
Group-II
Group-III

Group I: Standard group, which were normal rats.

Group II: Negative control group, which were given second-degree burns and treated with gel base (without Aloe vera extract).

Group III: Treatment groups, which were given second-degree burns and treated with Aloe vera extract gel.

Discussion

Macrophages are cells that multiply when there is a wound to phagocytose debris and bacteria and they are the predominant cells on the 3^rd day post wound infliction (Gurtner & Wong, 2013). This study showed that both negative control and treatment groups had more number of macrophages than standard group on the 3^rd day after injury. On the same day, the treatment group had more macrophages than negative control group because there is acemannan in aloe gel that could increase the number of macrophages (Sierra-García et al., 2014). The results of this study showed that there was reduction in number of macrophages in the treatment group than the negative control group on the 14^th and 21^st days after injury. Souza et al. (2017) reported a decrease in the number of macrophages in burn rats treated with 1% silver sulfadiazine.

In this study, both the 3^rd and 14^th days after injury demonstrated a higher number of fibroblasts in the treatment group than the negative control group. This might have happened because of interaction between glucomannan in aloe gel and gibberellin, a growth hormone, with growth factor receptors on fibroblast. This interaction stimulated fibroblast activity and proliferation that could increase collagen synthesis (Chithra et al., 1998; Surjushe et al., 2008). Besides that, there was also acemannan in aloe gel which could increase the proliferation of fibroblasts (Xing et al., 2014). Fibroblasts are cells that will increase their migration during the proliferation phase of wound healing. Therefore, this study showed highest number of fibroblasts on the 14^th day after injury in the treatment group which was earlier than the negative control group that had the highest number on the 21^st day after injury. At some point during the proliferation phase, there may be apoptosis of fibroblast when collagen matrix has filled the wound cavity (Gurtner & Wong, 2013). Therefore, there was a reduction in the number of fibroblasts on the 21^st day after injury in the treatment group.

Re-epithelialization occurs right after injury that consists of migration, proliferation, and differentiation of keratinocytes (Gurtner & Wong, 2013; Isrofah and Afandi, 2015). Acemannan could stimulate fibroblast to release keratinocyte growth factor-1 (KGF-1) that could hasten the re-epithelialization process by keratinocytes which could increase the epidermal thickness (Jettanacheawchankit et al., 2009). The result of this study showed that there was an increase in the epidermal thickness in both, negative control and treatment groups from the 3^rd day to the 21^st day after injury. But the treatment group had thicker epidermis than the negative control group which might be caused by acemannan. An in vitro study conducted by Teplicki et al. (2018) demonstrated that Aloe vera could speed up the migration and proliferation of keratinocytes. Another study conducted by Atiba et al. (2015) showed that Aloe vera could enhance the re-epithelialization process in corneal alkali burn in normal and diabetic rats.

Histopathological appearance of HE staining in burn model mice, group-I (standard/normal) without treatment from days 3, 14, and 21 did not change the number of macrophages and fibroblasts, and also there were no shown significant differences in epidermal thickening (see Figures 1, 2, 3 and 4). In group-II (negative control) tracing the migration of macrophages and fibroblasts on days 3, 14, and 21 were not significantly different, but the thickness of the epidermis could be seen from the data and the histopathological appearance seemed to increase (Figures 1, 2 and 4). This is because the physiological healing process is still going on without intervention, only given a topical gel base (see Figures 3 and 4). Meanwhile in group 3 (see Figures 3 and 4) the healing process occurred faster with greater epidermal thickening compared to untreated burn rats (negative control). This may be due to the fact that the remodeling phase runs faster on Group III than Group II without aloe vera treatment (negative control). This is suggested due to the presence of acemannan substances that play a role in increasing epidermal thickening, this is in line with research by Reinke and Sorg (2012).

Conclusion

Based on the result of the study Aloe vera extract could fasten the healing process of 2^nd degree burn wound in rats.

Data availability

Underlying data

Figshare: Effect of Aloe Vera in post-burn skin repair in rats

https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.17194973.v1

Reporting guidelines

Figshare: ARRIVE checklist for ‘Effect of Aloe Vera in Post-Burn Skin Repair in Rats’ (Aulia and Pane, 2022)

https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.17194973.v1

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

Author contributions

Aulia L: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation; Pane YS: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Acknowledgement

The authors give their appreciation and thanks to the Pharmacology Laboratory of the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara for allowing them to use the facility for collecting data for this research.

References

ABA: Advanced Burn Life Support Course Provider Manual. American Burn Asociation; 2018.
ABA: 2019 ABA NBR Annual Report - American Burn Association. 2019. accessed 9 April 2021. Reference Source
Atiba A, Wasfy T, Abdo W, et al.: Aloe vera gel facilitates re-epithelialization of corneal alkali burn in normal and diabetic rats. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2015. Publisher Full Text
Aulia L, Pane YS: Effect of Aloe vera extract in post-burn skin repair in rats. Figshare Dataset. 2022.
Chaby G, Viseux V, Poulain JF, et al.: Topical silver sulfadiazine-induced acute renal failure. Annales de Dermatologie et de Venereologie. 2005; 132: 891–893. PubMed Abstract
Chithra P, Sajithlal GB, Chandrakasan G: Influence of Aloe vera on collagen characteristics in healing dermal wounds in rats. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 1998; 181: 71–76. Publisher Full Text
Federer WY: Experimental Design, Theory and Application. New York: Mac.Millan; 1963; 544. Reference Source
Fuller FW, Engler PE: Leukopenia in non-septic burn patients receiving topical 1% silver sulfadiazine cream therapy: A survey. J. Burn Care Rehabil. 1988; 9: 606–609. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Gazali A, Ibnu I, Suriah: Perilaku Pencarian Pengobatan Terhadap Kejadian Penyakit Malaria Pada Suku Mandar Di Desa Lara Kecamatan Karossa Kabupaten Mamuju Provinsi Sulawesi Barat. Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Hasanudin. 2013; 1–13.
Gurtner GC, Wong VW: Wound Healing: Normal and Abnormal. Grabb and Smith’ s Plastic Surgery. 7th edn.Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.
Isrofah S, Afandi M: Efektivitas Salep Ekstrak Daun Binahong (Anredera Cordifolia (Ten) Steenis) Terhadap Proses Penyembuhan Luka Bakar Derajat 2 Termal pada Tikus Putih. Muhammadiyah Journal of Nursing. 2015.
Jettanacheawchankit S, Sasithanasate S, Sangvanich P, et al.: Acemannan stimulates gingival fibroblast proliferation; expressions of keratinocyte growth factor-1, vascular endothelial growth factor, and type I collagen; and wound healing. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2009; 109: 525–531. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Kristyaningsih P: Efektivitas Lidah Buaya (Aloe Vera) Dan Daunsirih (Piper Betle Linn) Terhadap Kesembuhan Luka Bakar Derajat Ii Pada Tikus Putih (Rattus Norvegicus Strain Wistar) Di Peternakan Tikus Sidomulyo Kediri. Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan. 2016; 5: 114–121.
Maulana RA: Faktor Resiko yang Berperan pada Mortalitas Penderita Luka Bakar Rawat Inap di RSUPH Adam Malik Medan dari Tahun 2011-2014. Universitas Sumatera Utara; 2014.
Menkes.: Pedoman Nasional Pelayanan Kedokteran - Tata Laksana Luka Bakar. Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. 2019.
Reinke JM, Sorg H: Wound repair and regeneration. Eur. Surg. Res. 2012; 49: 35–43. Publisher Full Text
Russell WMS, Burch RL: The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. London: Methuen& Co.Ltd; 1992. (Reissued: Universities Federation for Animal Welfare, Herts, England.) 1959. Reference Source
Sierra-García GD, Castro-Ríos R, González-Horta A, et al.: Acemannan, an extracted polysaccharide from Aloe vera: A literature review. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2014; 9: 1934578X1400900. Publisher Full Text
Smolle C, Cambiaso-Daniel J, Forbes AA, et al.: Recent trends in burn epidemiology worldwide: A systematic review. Burns. 2017; 43: 249–257. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Souza HR, De Azevedo LR, Possebon L, et al.: Heterogeneity of mast cells and expression of Annexin A1 protein in a second degree burn model with silver sulfadiazine treatment. PLoS One. 2017; 12: e0173417. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Surjushe A, Vasani R, Saple D: Aloe vera: A short review. Indian J. Dermatol. 2008; 53: 163–166. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Teplicki E, Ma Q, Castillo DE, et al.: The effects of aloe vera on wound healing in cell proliferation, migration, and viability. Wounds. 2018; 30: 263–268. PubMed Abstract
WHO: WHO|Burns. 2018. accessed 29 May 2021. Reference Source
Xing W, Guo W, Zou CH, et al.: Acemannan accelerates cell proliferation and skin wound healing through AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2014; 79: 101–109. Publisher Full Text

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 3

VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 11 Feb 2022

Author details Author details

Lusiana Aulia
Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Yunita Sari Pane
Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Competing interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Article Versions (3)

version 3

Revised

Published: 28 Feb 2023, 11:168

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.79538.3

version 2

Revised

Published: 29 Jul 2022, 11:168

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.79538.2

version 1

Published: 11 Feb 2022, 11:168

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.79538.1

© 2023 Aulia L and Pane YS. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Download

Export To

metrics

	Views	Downloads
F1000Research	-	-
PubMed Central Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.	-	-

Citations

SEE MORE DETAILS

CITE

how to cite this article

Aulia L and Pane YS. Effect of Aloe vera extract in post-burn skin repair in rats [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2023, 11:168 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.79538.3)

NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

track

receive updates on this article

Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?

Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE

ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested

Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.

Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Version 3

VERSION 3

PUBLISHED 28 Feb 2023

Revised

Views

Reviewer Report 04 May 2023

Fatima Ali, Applications of Stem Cells in Cancer Therapy: A Literature Based Studies, University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.144246.r145983

Greeting of a day!
i go ... Continue reading

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Version 2

VERSION 2

PUBLISHED 29 Jul 2022

Revised

Views

Reviewer Report 01 Feb 2023

Reza Vaghardoost, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Not Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.135733.r157960

Major concerns:

In the method section, the authors mentioned that they divided the rats into 3 groups, group 1 no treatment, group 2 with gel base and group 3 with Aloe Vera gel. Why did they

Major concerns:

In the method section, the authors mentioned that they divided the rats into 3 groups, group 1 no treatment, group 2 with gel base and group 3 with Aloe Vera gel. Why did they name group 1 as standard group? What do they mean by "standard"?
This study lacks the visual observation with camera and authors did not show any images of the appearance of the wounds and wound improvement. This is a major concern and needs to be addressed.
The conclusion is a bold statement. What are the next steps?
What are the limitations of the study?

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

No

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Burn injuries and reconstructive surgery

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above.

CITE

Report a concern

Author Response 28 Feb 2023

Yunita Sari Pane, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, 20155, Indonesia

28 Feb 2023

Author Response
Question No 1. In the method section, the authors mentioned that they divided the rats into 3 groups, group 1 without treatment, group 2 with gel base and group 3 ... Continue reading
Question No 1. In the method section, the authors mentioned that they divided the rats into 3 groups, group 1 without treatment, group 2 with gel base and group 3 with Aloe Vera gel. Why did they name group 1 as standard group? What do they mean by "standard"?

Answer:

Naming group 1 as the standard group because group I is a group consisting of normal rat samples without being given burns or treatment only as a comparison to normal skin histology.
This research is a true experimental study which has a control variable and the sample is randomly selected.

At the beginning of the study we divided 54 rats into 3 large groups (group-I, II and III) with 3 small groups in them (day 3, 14 and 21) of each group @ 6 rats, namely:

Group I consisted of 18 rats divided into 3 small groups of 6 rats each. This group will be executed and their skin tissue will be taken on day-3, day-14 and day-21. The skin tissue taken was then examined histopathologically and used as a control skin of NORMAL rats without being treated for BURN. Therefore we call Group I as the "STANDARD GROUP".

Group II consisted of 18 rats divided into 3 small groups of 6 rats each which were treated with BURN WOUNDS on the back of each rat, and every day they were smeared with gel base (gel without active substance) to see how the burn wound healed physiologically . We named this Group II the "NEGATIVE CONTROL GROUP" because it was not given any treatment.

Whereas group III consisted of 18 rats divided into 3 small groups of 6 rats each which were treated with BURNS on the back of each rat, and smeared with Aloe vera gel (a gel with the active ingredient Aloe vera herb) every day to see how the process is progressed to healing burns with Aloe vera treatment. We call this Group III the "TREATMENT GROUP" because they were given the Aloe vera gel treatment.

Question No 2. This study lacks visual observation with a camera and the authors do not show a picture of the appearance of the wound and wound repair. This is a major concern and needs to be addressed.

Answer:
See Figure 6 in the new version.

Question No 3. The conclusion is a bold statement. What's the next step?

Answer:
See the conclusion in the new version.

Question No 4. What are the limitations of the study?

Answer:

Application of gel to burns in rats that cannot be controlled because rats can lick/clean it even though it has been prepared by making burns on the rat's back which is difficult for them to reach compared to the stomach, legs and other areas.

The rat rubbed the wound so that the application of Aloe vera gel became less/ineffective.

The limited time of this research makes this research must be completed within the specified time.
Question No 1. In the method section, the authors mentioned that they divided the rats into 3 groups, group 1 without treatment, group 2 with gel base and group 3 with Aloe Vera gel. Why did they name group 1 as standard group? What do they mean by "standard"?

Answer:

Naming group 1 as the standard group because group I is a group consisting of normal rat samples without being given burns or treatment only as a comparison to normal skin histology.
This research is a true experimental study which has a control variable and the sample is randomly selected.

At the beginning of the study we divided 54 rats into 3 large groups (group-I, II and III) with 3 small groups in them (day 3, 14 and 21) of each group @ 6 rats, namely:

Group I consisted of 18 rats divided into 3 small groups of 6 rats each. This group will be executed and their skin tissue will be taken on day-3, day-14 and day-21. The skin tissue taken was then examined histopathologically and used as a control skin of NORMAL rats without being treated for BURN. Therefore we call Group I as the "STANDARD GROUP".

Group II consisted of 18 rats divided into 3 small groups of 6 rats each which were treated with BURN WOUNDS on the back of each rat, and every day they were smeared with gel base (gel without active substance) to see how the burn wound healed physiologically . We named this Group II the "NEGATIVE CONTROL GROUP" because it was not given any treatment.

Whereas group III consisted of 18 rats divided into 3 small groups of 6 rats each which were treated with BURNS on the back of each rat, and smeared with Aloe vera gel (a gel with the active ingredient Aloe vera herb) every day to see how the process is progressed to healing burns with Aloe vera treatment. We call this Group III the "TREATMENT GROUP" because they were given the Aloe vera gel treatment.

Question No 2. This study lacks visual observation with a camera and the authors do not show a picture of the appearance of the wound and wound repair. This is a major concern and needs to be addressed.

Answer:
See Figure 6 in the new version.

Question No 3. The conclusion is a bold statement. What's the next step?

Answer:
See the conclusion in the new version.

Question No 4. What are the limitations of the study?

Answer:

Application of gel to burns in rats that cannot be controlled because rats can lick/clean it even though it has been prepared by making burns on the rat's back which is difficult for them to reach compared to the stomach, legs and other areas.

The rat rubbed the wound so that the application of Aloe vera gel became less/ineffective.

The limited time of this research makes this research must be completed within the specified time.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
Report a concern
Respond or Comment

COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT

Author Response 28 Feb 2023

Yunita Sari Pane, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, 20155, Indonesia

28 Feb 2023

Author Response
Question No 1. In the method section, the authors mentioned that they divided the rats into 3 groups, group 1 without treatment, group 2 with gel base and group 3 ... Continue reading
Question No 1. In the method section, the authors mentioned that they divided the rats into 3 groups, group 1 without treatment, group 2 with gel base and group 3 with Aloe Vera gel. Why did they name group 1 as standard group? What do they mean by "standard"?

Answer:

Naming group 1 as the standard group because group I is a group consisting of normal rat samples without being given burns or treatment only as a comparison to normal skin histology.
This research is a true experimental study which has a control variable and the sample is randomly selected.

At the beginning of the study we divided 54 rats into 3 large groups (group-I, II and III) with 3 small groups in them (day 3, 14 and 21) of each group @ 6 rats, namely:

Group I consisted of 18 rats divided into 3 small groups of 6 rats each. This group will be executed and their skin tissue will be taken on day-3, day-14 and day-21. The skin tissue taken was then examined histopathologically and used as a control skin of NORMAL rats without being treated for BURN. Therefore we call Group I as the "STANDARD GROUP".

Group II consisted of 18 rats divided into 3 small groups of 6 rats each which were treated with BURN WOUNDS on the back of each rat, and every day they were smeared with gel base (gel without active substance) to see how the burn wound healed physiologically . We named this Group II the "NEGATIVE CONTROL GROUP" because it was not given any treatment.

Whereas group III consisted of 18 rats divided into 3 small groups of 6 rats each which were treated with BURNS on the back of each rat, and smeared with Aloe vera gel (a gel with the active ingredient Aloe vera herb) every day to see how the process is progressed to healing burns with Aloe vera treatment. We call this Group III the "TREATMENT GROUP" because they were given the Aloe vera gel treatment.

Question No 2. This study lacks visual observation with a camera and the authors do not show a picture of the appearance of the wound and wound repair. This is a major concern and needs to be addressed.

Answer:
See Figure 6 in the new version.

Question No 3. The conclusion is a bold statement. What's the next step?

Answer:
See the conclusion in the new version.

Question No 4. What are the limitations of the study?

Answer:

Application of gel to burns in rats that cannot be controlled because rats can lick/clean it even though it has been prepared by making burns on the rat's back which is difficult for them to reach compared to the stomach, legs and other areas.

The rat rubbed the wound so that the application of Aloe vera gel became less/ineffective.

The limited time of this research makes this research must be completed within the specified time.
Question No 1. In the method section, the authors mentioned that they divided the rats into 3 groups, group 1 without treatment, group 2 with gel base and group 3 with Aloe Vera gel. Why did they name group 1 as standard group? What do they mean by "standard"?

Answer:

Naming group 1 as the standard group because group I is a group consisting of normal rat samples without being given burns or treatment only as a comparison to normal skin histology.
This research is a true experimental study which has a control variable and the sample is randomly selected.

At the beginning of the study we divided 54 rats into 3 large groups (group-I, II and III) with 3 small groups in them (day 3, 14 and 21) of each group @ 6 rats, namely:

Group I consisted of 18 rats divided into 3 small groups of 6 rats each. This group will be executed and their skin tissue will be taken on day-3, day-14 and day-21. The skin tissue taken was then examined histopathologically and used as a control skin of NORMAL rats without being treated for BURN. Therefore we call Group I as the "STANDARD GROUP".

Group II consisted of 18 rats divided into 3 small groups of 6 rats each which were treated with BURN WOUNDS on the back of each rat, and every day they were smeared with gel base (gel without active substance) to see how the burn wound healed physiologically . We named this Group II the "NEGATIVE CONTROL GROUP" because it was not given any treatment.

Whereas group III consisted of 18 rats divided into 3 small groups of 6 rats each which were treated with BURNS on the back of each rat, and smeared with Aloe vera gel (a gel with the active ingredient Aloe vera herb) every day to see how the process is progressed to healing burns with Aloe vera treatment. We call this Group III the "TREATMENT GROUP" because they were given the Aloe vera gel treatment.

Question No 2. This study lacks visual observation with a camera and the authors do not show a picture of the appearance of the wound and wound repair. This is a major concern and needs to be addressed.

Answer:
See Figure 6 in the new version.

Question No 3. The conclusion is a bold statement. What's the next step?

Answer:
See the conclusion in the new version.

Question No 4. What are the limitations of the study?

Answer:

Application of gel to burns in rats that cannot be controlled because rats can lick/clean it even though it has been prepared by making burns on the rat's back which is difficult for them to reach compared to the stomach, legs and other areas.

The rat rubbed the wound so that the application of Aloe vera gel became less/ineffective.

The limited time of this research makes this research must be completed within the specified time.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
Report a concern

Views

Reviewer Report 01 Aug 2022

Gusbakti Rusip, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Prima Indonesia, Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.135733.r145982

The answer from the author is by the ... Continue reading

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Version 1

VERSION 1

PUBLISHED 11 Feb 2022

Views

Reviewer Report 28 Apr 2022

Fatima Ali, Applications of Stem Cells in Cancer Therapy: A Literature Based Studies, University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan

Not Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.83532.r128998

Major:

The authors mainly focuses on wound repair after burn injury but fail to show the result. Only the data of fibroblast and macrophages did not justify the whole questions? To answer this question author must

Major:

The authors mainly focuses on wound repair after burn injury but fail to show the result. Only the data of fibroblast and macrophages did not justify the whole questions? To answer this question author must show picture of wound healing, histopathological picture, wound healing area,
How authors say that the size of 2×2 cm2 is reduced? Author must show the data about the wound healing in term of wound healing picture and wound healing area?
Images of a H&E staining should be provided and correlate it with number of fibroblast and other mentioned cells.
Improve the scientific language.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

No
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Stem cell

CITE

Report a concern

Author Response 29 Jul 2022

Yunita Sari Pane, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, 20155, Indonesia

29 Jul 2022

Author Response
Dear Fatima Ali,

Thank you for the comments on our manuscript. I would like to highlight some particulars regarding the work we have done according to the comments:
... Continue reading
Dear Fatima Ali,

Thank you for the comments on our manuscript. I would like to highlight some particulars regarding the work we have done according to the comments:

We have revised the results section regarding histopathological images as microscopic parameters. So, we don't need to show a picture of wound healing (macroscopic parameters), because it isn’t in accordance with the aim of this study i.e: mean number of macrophages, number of fibroblasts, and epidermal thickness.

In this study, there is no statement of a reduction in burns. As for the information about 2x2cm2, it is the area of the wound that was determined in this study ( see in wound inflection part of the method).

In the revision, we have added histopathological images of macrophages, fibroblasts, and epidermal thickening. the explanation histopathological picture can be correlated with pictures 1, 2, and 3 (see results section).

Thank you for your suggestion, we will try to improve our ability in scientific language.
Dear Fatima Ali,

Thank you for the comments on our manuscript. I would like to highlight some particulars regarding the work we have done according to the comments:

We have revised the results section regarding histopathological images as microscopic parameters. So, we don't need to show a picture of wound healing (macroscopic parameters), because it isn’t in accordance with the aim of this study i.e: mean number of macrophages, number of fibroblasts, and epidermal thickness.

In this study, there is no statement of a reduction in burns. As for the information about 2x2cm2, it is the area of the wound that was determined in this study ( see in wound inflection part of the method).

In the revision, we have added histopathological images of macrophages, fibroblasts, and epidermal thickening. the explanation histopathological picture can be correlated with pictures 1, 2, and 3 (see results section).

Thank you for your suggestion, we will try to improve our ability in scientific language.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
Report a concern
Respond or Comment

COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT

Author Response 29 Jul 2022

Yunita Sari Pane, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, 20155, Indonesia

29 Jul 2022

Author Response
Dear Fatima Ali,

Thank you for the comments on our manuscript. I would like to highlight some particulars regarding the work we have done according to the comments:
... Continue reading
Dear Fatima Ali,

Thank you for the comments on our manuscript. I would like to highlight some particulars regarding the work we have done according to the comments:

We have revised the results section regarding histopathological images as microscopic parameters. So, we don't need to show a picture of wound healing (macroscopic parameters), because it isn’t in accordance with the aim of this study i.e: mean number of macrophages, number of fibroblasts, and epidermal thickness.

In this study, there is no statement of a reduction in burns. As for the information about 2x2cm2, it is the area of the wound that was determined in this study ( see in wound inflection part of the method).

In the revision, we have added histopathological images of macrophages, fibroblasts, and epidermal thickening. the explanation histopathological picture can be correlated with pictures 1, 2, and 3 (see results section).

Thank you for your suggestion, we will try to improve our ability in scientific language.
Dear Fatima Ali,

Thank you for the comments on our manuscript. I would like to highlight some particulars regarding the work we have done according to the comments:

We have revised the results section regarding histopathological images as microscopic parameters. So, we don't need to show a picture of wound healing (macroscopic parameters), because it isn’t in accordance with the aim of this study i.e: mean number of macrophages, number of fibroblasts, and epidermal thickness.

In this study, there is no statement of a reduction in burns. As for the information about 2x2cm2, it is the area of the wound that was determined in this study ( see in wound inflection part of the method).

In the revision, we have added histopathological images of macrophages, fibroblasts, and epidermal thickening. the explanation histopathological picture can be correlated with pictures 1, 2, and 3 (see results section).

Thank you for your suggestion, we will try to improve our ability in scientific language.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
Report a concern

Views

Reviewer Report 28 Feb 2022

Gusbakti Rusip, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Prima Indonesia, Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

Approved with Reservations

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.83532.r123296

The manuscript by Lusiana Aulia and Yunita Sari Pane presents the intervening Effect of Aloe vera extract in post-burn skin repair in rats. In general, I find this manuscript to make an important contribution in developing palatable and superior bioactive compounds in Aloe vera containing various active ingredients that help the wound healing process, such as glucomannan and acemannan. However, I have outlined below some of the issues that need to be addressed prior to indexing, and some minor comments and suggestions to further improve the quality of the manuscript.

Major

In the abstract and introduction, the author states that one of the objectives of this study is to improve post-burn skin with the intervention of Aloe vera extract. However, histopathological description of the healing process of burns is not presented and discussed.
The method part is not clear. It is not clear the analytical method for macrophage and fibroblast counts and the analytical formula is not specified, the authors need to explain it. Please clarify and make changes to the methods section as appropriate.
In the discussion section, it is not explained how this study shows a synergistic interaction between changes that occur on days 3, 14 and 21 and between a number of macrophages and fibroblasts in figures 1, 2 and 3 with no visible histopathologic changes. It's better to call it the calculation score.

Minor

In the method section, how much Aloe vera contains? Explain the total solids content of the gel material used in the study.
In the results section, a description of the histopathological picture is explained in relation to the analysis results from figures 1,2 and 3. It would be easier to explain in the discussion section.
In the discussion section, please explain clearly the bioactive compounds contained in Aloe vera other than glucomannan and acemannan. Are there other active ingredients? What do the authors mean treatment days 14 and 21? Describe the histopathological picture with figures 1,2 and 3.
In the introduction and abstract, Aloe vera intervention changes macrophages, fibroblasts and increases bioactive compounds and their potential for healing functional burns. The conclusion states that it is a potential pharmaceutical product. Please be consistent.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Physiology human, exercise, and much research-related use plants as herbal medicine

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

CITE

Report a concern

Author Response 10 Mar 2022

Yunita Sari Pane, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, 20155, Indonesia

10 Mar 2022

Author Response
Dear Prof Gusbakti Rusip,

I really appreciate your willingness to review my manuscript. Here I explain more information to improve understanding in this article.

Major:
1. We
... Continue reading
Dear Prof Gusbakti Rusip,

I really appreciate your willingness to review my manuscript. Here I explain more information to improve understanding in this article.

Major:

We have assessed entirely during the present study, but I couldn't document all due to lack of memory byte card on the camera, So I took a few photos that can represented it and can be seen in figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.17194973.v1)

We used the ANOVA test because in this study we used more than two groups with parametric data types

We have presented and correlated the changes that occur on days 3,14,21 in macrophages and fibroblasts that could be seen in Figures 1 and 2 and had been discussed in the discussion section.

Minor:

Aloe vera contained 10% of the total weight of the gel (see gel preparation)

In journal writing, repetition of words should be avoided, therefore we chose to explain in detail the number and comparison between groups in the results section. While in the discussion section we explained the comparison of our findings with other studies

Aloe vera has active ingredients other than acemannan and glucomannan, but based on the literature that we read, it proved that they could play a role in burn repair.

We did not state that aloe vera can be used as a pharmaceutical product in the conclusion section (see part conclusion). We only stated that aloe vera could accelerate the healing process as proven by this study.
Dear Prof Gusbakti Rusip,

I really appreciate your willingness to review my manuscript. Here I explain more information to improve understanding in this article.

Major:

We have assessed entirely during the present study, but I couldn't document all due to lack of memory byte card on the camera, So I took a few photos that can represented it and can be seen in figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.17194973.v1)

We used the ANOVA test because in this study we used more than two groups with parametric data types

We have presented and correlated the changes that occur on days 3,14,21 in macrophages and fibroblasts that could be seen in Figures 1 and 2 and had been discussed in the discussion section.

Minor:

Aloe vera contained 10% of the total weight of the gel (see gel preparation)

In journal writing, repetition of words should be avoided, therefore we chose to explain in detail the number and comparison between groups in the results section. While in the discussion section we explained the comparison of our findings with other studies

Aloe vera has active ingredients other than acemannan and glucomannan, but based on the literature that we read, it proved that they could play a role in burn repair.

We did not state that aloe vera can be used as a pharmaceutical product in the conclusion section (see part conclusion). We only stated that aloe vera could accelerate the healing process as proven by this study.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
Report a concern
Respond or Comment

COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT

Author Response 10 Mar 2022

Yunita Sari Pane, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, 20155, Indonesia

10 Mar 2022

Author Response
Dear Prof Gusbakti Rusip,

I really appreciate your willingness to review my manuscript. Here I explain more information to improve understanding in this article.

Major:
1. We
... Continue reading
Dear Prof Gusbakti Rusip,

I really appreciate your willingness to review my manuscript. Here I explain more information to improve understanding in this article.

Major:

We have assessed entirely during the present study, but I couldn't document all due to lack of memory byte card on the camera, So I took a few photos that can represented it and can be seen in figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.17194973.v1)

We used the ANOVA test because in this study we used more than two groups with parametric data types

We have presented and correlated the changes that occur on days 3,14,21 in macrophages and fibroblasts that could be seen in Figures 1 and 2 and had been discussed in the discussion section.

Minor:

Aloe vera contained 10% of the total weight of the gel (see gel preparation)

In journal writing, repetition of words should be avoided, therefore we chose to explain in detail the number and comparison between groups in the results section. While in the discussion section we explained the comparison of our findings with other studies

Aloe vera has active ingredients other than acemannan and glucomannan, but based on the literature that we read, it proved that they could play a role in burn repair.

We did not state that aloe vera can be used as a pharmaceutical product in the conclusion section (see part conclusion). We only stated that aloe vera could accelerate the healing process as proven by this study.
Dear Prof Gusbakti Rusip,

I really appreciate your willingness to review my manuscript. Here I explain more information to improve understanding in this article.

Major:

We have assessed entirely during the present study, but I couldn't document all due to lack of memory byte card on the camera, So I took a few photos that can represented it and can be seen in figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.17194973.v1)

We used the ANOVA test because in this study we used more than two groups with parametric data types

We have presented and correlated the changes that occur on days 3,14,21 in macrophages and fibroblasts that could be seen in Figures 1 and 2 and had been discussed in the discussion section.

Minor:

Aloe vera contained 10% of the total weight of the gel (see gel preparation)

In journal writing, repetition of words should be avoided, therefore we chose to explain in detail the number and comparison between groups in the results section. While in the discussion section we explained the comparison of our findings with other studies

Aloe vera has active ingredients other than acemannan and glucomannan, but based on the literature that we read, it proved that they could play a role in burn repair.

We did not state that aloe vera can be used as a pharmaceutical product in the conclusion section (see part conclusion). We only stated that aloe vera could accelerate the healing process as proven by this study.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
Report a concern

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 3

VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 11 Feb 2022

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

	Invited Reviewers
	1	2	3
Version 3 (revision) 28 Feb 23		read
Version 2 (revision) 29 Jul 22	read		read
Version 1 11 Feb 22	read	read

Gusbakti Rusip, Universitas Prima Indonesia, Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
Fatima Ali, University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
Reza Vaghardoost, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Comments on this article

All Comments(0)

Add a comment

Browse by related subjects

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

12 Views

04 May 2023 | for Version 3

Fatima Ali, Applications of Stem Cells in Cancer Therapy: A Literature Based Studies, University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan

12 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

Greeting of a day!
i go through the revised version and stand it approved.

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Molecular Biology and stem cell

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

41 Views

01 Feb 2023 | for Version 2

Reza Vaghardoost, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

41 Views Cite this report Responses(1)

Not Approved

Major concerns:

In the method section, the authors mentioned that they divided the rats into 3 groups, group 1 no treatment, group 2 with gel base and group 3 with Aloe Vera gel. Why did they name group 1 as standard group? What do they mean by "standard"?
This study lacks the visual observation with camera and authors did not show any images of the appearance of the wounds and wound improvement. This is a major concern and needs to be addressed.
The conclusion is a bold statement. What are the next steps?
What are the limitations of the study?

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

No

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Burn injuries and reconstructive surgery

Respond to this report

Responses (1)

Author Response

28 Feb 2023

Yunita Sari Pane, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, 20155, Indonesia

Question No 1. In the method section, the authors mentioned that they divided the rats into 3 groups, group 1 without treatment, group 2 with gel base and group 3 with Aloe Vera gel. Why did they name group 1 as standard group? What do they mean by "standard"?

Answer:

Naming group 1 as the standard group because group I is a group consisting of normal rat samples without being given burns or treatment only as a comparison to normal skin histology.
This research is a true experimental study which has a control variable and the sample is randomly selected.

At the beginning of the study we divided 54 rats into 3 large groups (group-I, II and III) with 3 small groups in them (day 3, 14 and 21) of each group @ 6 rats, namely:

Group I consisted of 18 rats divided into 3 small groups of 6 rats each. This group will be executed and their skin tissue will be taken on day-3, day-14 and day-21. The skin tissue taken was then examined histopathologically and used as a control skin of NORMAL rats without being treated for BURN. Therefore we call Group I as the "STANDARD GROUP".
Group II consisted of 18 rats divided into 3 small groups of 6 rats each which were treated with BURN WOUNDS on the back of each rat, and every day they were smeared with gel base (gel without active substance) to see how the burn wound healed physiologically . We named this Group II the "NEGATIVE CONTROL GROUP" because it was not given any treatment.
Whereas group III consisted of 18 rats divided into 3 small groups of 6 rats each which were treated with BURNS on the back of each rat, and smeared with Aloe vera gel (a gel with the active ingredient Aloe vera herb) every day to see how the process is progressed to healing burns with Aloe vera treatment. We call this Group III the "TREATMENT GROUP" because they were given the Aloe vera gel treatment.

Question No 2. This study lacks visual observation with a camera and the authors do not show a picture of the appearance of the wound and wound repair. This is a major concern and needs to be addressed.

Answer:
See Figure 6 in the new version.

Question No 3. The conclusion is a bold statement. What's the next step?

Answer:
See the conclusion in the new version.

Question No 4. What are the limitations of the study?

Answer:

Application of gel to burns in rats that cannot be controlled because rats can lick/clean it even though it has been prepared by making burns on the rat's back which is difficult for them to reach compared to the stomach, legs and other areas.
The rat rubbed the wound so that the application of Aloe vera gel became less/ineffective.
The limited time of this research makes this research must be completed within the specified time.

View more View less

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

20 Views

01 Aug 2022 | for Version 2

Gusbakti Rusip, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Prima Indonesia, Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

20 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

The answer from the author is by the response; the manuscript is perfect. I approve the article

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Physiology human, exercise, and much research-related use plants as herbal medicine

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

68 Views

28 Apr 2022 | for Version 1

Fatima Ali, Applications of Stem Cells in Cancer Therapy: A Literature Based Studies, University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan

68 Views Cite this report Responses(1)

Not Approved

Major:

The authors mainly focuses on wound repair after burn injury but fail to show the result. Only the data of fibroblast and macrophages did not justify the whole questions? To answer this question author must show picture of wound healing, histopathological picture, wound healing area,
How authors say that the size of 2×2 cm2 is reduced? Author must show the data about the wound healing in term of wound healing picture and wound healing area?
Images of a H&E staining should be provided and correlate it with number of fibroblast and other mentioned cells.
Improve the scientific language.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

No
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Stem cell

Respond to this report

Responses (1)

Author Response

29 Jul 2022

Yunita Sari Pane, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, 20155, Indonesia

Dear Fatima Ali,

Thank you for the comments on our manuscript. I would like to highlight some particulars regarding the work we have done according to the comments:

We have revised the results section regarding histopathological images as microscopic parameters. So, we don't need to show a picture of wound healing (macroscopic parameters), because it isn’t in accordance with the aim of this study i.e: mean number of macrophages, number of fibroblasts, and epidermal thickness.
In this study, there is no statement of a reduction in burns. As for the information about 2x2cm2, it is the area of the wound that was determined in this study ( see in wound inflection part of the method).
In the revision, we have added histopathological images of macrophages, fibroblasts, and epidermal thickening. the explanation histopathological picture can be correlated with pictures 1, 2, and 3 (see results section).
Thank you for your suggestion, we will try to improve our ability in scientific language.

View more View less

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

93 Views

28 Feb 2022 | for Version 1

Gusbakti Rusip, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Prima Indonesia, Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

93 Views Cite this report Responses(1)

Approved With Reservations

In the abstract and introduction, the author states that one of the objectives of this study is to improve post-burn skin with the intervention of Aloe vera extract. However, histopathological description of the healing process of burns is not presented and discussed.
The method part is not clear. It is not clear the analytical method for macrophage and fibroblast counts and the analytical formula is not specified, the authors need to explain it. Please clarify and make changes to the methods section as appropriate.
In the discussion section, it is not explained how this study shows a synergistic interaction between changes that occur on days 3, 14 and 21 and between a number of macrophages and fibroblasts in figures 1, 2 and 3 with no visible histopathologic changes. It's better to call it the calculation score.

Minor

In the method section, how much Aloe vera contains? Explain the total solids content of the gel material used in the study.
In the results section, a description of the histopathological picture is explained in relation to the analysis results from figures 1,2 and 3. It would be easier to explain in the discussion section.
In the discussion section, please explain clearly the bioactive compounds contained in Aloe vera other than glucomannan and acemannan. Are there other active ingredients? What do the authors mean treatment days 14 and 21? Describe the histopathological picture with figures 1,2 and 3.
In the introduction and abstract, Aloe vera intervention changes macrophages, fibroblasts and increases bioactive compounds and their potential for healing functional burns. The conclusion states that it is a potential pharmaceutical product. Please be consistent.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Physiology human, exercise, and much research-related use plants as herbal medicine

Respond to this report

Responses (1)

Author Response

10 Mar 2022

Yunita Sari Pane, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, 20155, Indonesia

Dear Prof Gusbakti Rusip,

I really appreciate your willingness to review my manuscript. Here I explain more information to improve understanding in this article.

Major:

We have assessed entirely during the present study, but I couldn't document all due to lack of memory byte card on the camera, So I took a few photos that can represented it and can be seen in figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.17194973.v1)
We used the ANOVA test because in this study we used more than two groups with parametric data types
We have presented and correlated the changes that occur on days 3,14,21 in macrophages and fibroblasts that could be seen in Figures 1 and 2 and had been discussed in the discussion section.

Minor:

Aloe vera contained 10% of the total weight of the gel (see gel preparation)
In journal writing, repetition of words should be avoided, therefore we chose to explain in detail the number and comparison between groups in the results section. While in the discussion section we explained the comparison of our findings with other studies
Aloe vera has active ingredients other than acemannan and glucomannan, but based on the literature that we read, it proved that they could play a role in burn repair.
We did not state that aloe vera can be used as a pharmaceutical product in the conclusion section (see part conclusion). We only stated that aloe vera could accelerate the healing process as proven by this study.

View more View less

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:

Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested

Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.

Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

[1] ABA: Advanced Burn Life Support Course Provider Manual. American Burn Asociation; 2018.

[2] ABA: 2019 ABA NBR Annual Report - American Burn Association. 2019. accessed 9 April 2021. Reference Source

[3] Atiba A, Wasfy T, Abdo W, et al.: Aloe vera gel facilitates re-epithelialization of corneal alkali burn in normal and diabetic rats. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2015. Publisher Full Text

[4] Aulia L, Pane YS: Effect of Aloe vera extract in post-burn skin repair in rats. Figshare Dataset. 2022.

[5] Chaby G, Viseux V, Poulain JF, et al.: Topical silver sulfadiazine-induced acute renal failure. Annales de Dermatologie et de Venereologie. 2005; 132: 891–893. PubMed Abstract

[6] Chithra P, Sajithlal GB, Chandrakasan G: Influence of Aloe vera on collagen characteristics in healing dermal wounds in rats. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 1998; 181: 71–76. Publisher Full Text

[7] Federer WY: Experimental Design, Theory and Application. New York: Mac.Millan; 1963; 544. Reference Source

[8] Fuller FW, Engler PE: Leukopenia in non-septic burn patients receiving topical 1% silver sulfadiazine cream therapy: A survey. J. Burn Care Rehabil. 1988; 9: 606–609. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[9] Gazali A, Ibnu I, Suriah: Perilaku Pencarian Pengobatan Terhadap Kejadian Penyakit Malaria Pada Suku Mandar Di Desa Lara Kecamatan Karossa Kabupaten Mamuju Provinsi Sulawesi Barat. Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Hasanudin. 2013; 1–13.

[10] Gurtner GC, Wong VW: Wound Healing: Normal and Abnormal. Grabb and Smith’ s Plastic Surgery. 7th edn.Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.

[11] Isrofah S, Afandi M: Efektivitas Salep Ekstrak Daun Binahong (Anredera Cordifolia (Ten) Steenis) Terhadap Proses Penyembuhan Luka Bakar Derajat 2 Termal pada Tikus Putih. Muhammadiyah Journal of Nursing. 2015.

[12] Jettanacheawchankit S, Sasithanasate S, Sangvanich P, et al.: Acemannan stimulates gingival fibroblast proliferation; expressions of keratinocyte growth factor-1, vascular endothelial growth factor, and type I collagen; and wound healing. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2009; 109: 525–531. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[13] Kristyaningsih P: Efektivitas Lidah Buaya (Aloe Vera) Dan Daunsirih (Piper Betle Linn) Terhadap Kesembuhan Luka Bakar Derajat Ii Pada Tikus Putih (Rattus Norvegicus Strain Wistar) Di Peternakan Tikus Sidomulyo Kediri. Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan. 2016; 5: 114–121.

[14] Maulana RA: Faktor Resiko yang Berperan pada Mortalitas Penderita Luka Bakar Rawat Inap di RSUPH Adam Malik Medan dari Tahun 2011-2014. Universitas Sumatera Utara; 2014.

[15] Menkes.: Pedoman Nasional Pelayanan Kedokteran - Tata Laksana Luka Bakar. Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. 2019.

[16] Reinke JM, Sorg H: Wound repair and regeneration. Eur. Surg. Res. 2012; 49: 35–43. Publisher Full Text

[17] Russell WMS, Burch RL: The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. London: Methuen& Co.Ltd; 1992. (Reissued: Universities Federation for Animal Welfare, Herts, England.) 1959. Reference Source

[18] Sierra-García GD, Castro-Ríos R, González-Horta A, et al.: Acemannan, an extracted polysaccharide from Aloe vera: A literature review. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2014; 9: 1934578X1400900. Publisher Full Text

[19] Smolle C, Cambiaso-Daniel J, Forbes AA, et al.: Recent trends in burn epidemiology worldwide: A systematic review. Burns. 2017; 43: 249–257. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[20] Souza HR, De Azevedo LR, Possebon L, et al.: Heterogeneity of mast cells and expression of Annexin A1 protein in a second degree burn model with silver sulfadiazine treatment. PLoS One. 2017; 12: e0173417. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[21] Surjushe A, Vasani R, Saple D: Aloe vera: A short review. Indian J. Dermatol. 2008; 53: 163–166. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[22] Teplicki E, Ma Q, Castillo DE, et al.: The effects of aloe vera on wound healing in cell proliferation, migration, and viability. Wounds. 2018; 30: 263–268. PubMed Abstract

[23] WHO: WHO|Burns. 2018. accessed 29 May 2021. Reference Source

[24] Xing W, Guo W, Zou CH, et al.: Acemannan accelerates cell proliferation and skin wound healing through AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2014; 79: 101–109. Publisher Full Text

Effect of Aloe vera extract in post-burn skin repair in rats

Abstract

Keywords

Revised Amendments from Version 2

Introduction

Methods

Ethics

Experimental animal

Allocation and treatment groups

Wound infliction

Aloe vera extract

Gel preparation

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining

Statistical analysis

Results

Figure 1. Mean number of macrophages.

Figure 2. Mean number of fibroblasts

Figure 3. Mean number of epidermal thickness.

Figure 4. There was a change in epidermal thickness on days 3, 14 and 21.

Figure 5. The histopathological description of macrophages () fibroblast () and epidermal thickness ().

Table 1. Pictures in Table 1 shows the healing process of burns on day-3,-14 and -21.

Discussion

Conclusion

Data availability

Underlying data

Reporting guidelines

Author contributions

Acknowledgement

References

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

Comments on this article

Browse by related subjects

Competing Interests Policy

Stay Updated