Keywords
Joubert syndrome, CEP290, molecular genetics, ciliopathy, retinal dystrophy
This article is included in the Genomics and Genetics gateway.
Joubert syndrome, CEP290, molecular genetics, ciliopathy, retinal dystrophy
The manuscript has been updated with a new table (Table 1) to describe the clinical features of presented case in a clearer manner. Table 2 has been updated to allow the reported case to be compared to cases carrying the same CEP290 allele. We have also now included a detailed discussion of the problems in describing genotype-phenotype correlation within CEP290-associated disease cases.
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Karen I. Lange
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Muhammad Ansar
Joubert syndrome (JS, MIM 213300) is a rare heterogeneous neurodevelopmental disease, being associated with an autosomal or X-chromosomal recessive inheritance. There are at least 34 genes (OMIM PS213300) associated with different subtypes of JS (Parisi and Glass 1993). JS can present clinically with different symptoms including hypotonia progressing to ataxia, global development delay, eye movement abnormalities (nystagmus and ocular molar apraxia) and dysregulation of breathing. Other clinical features found in JS patients depends upon other systemic involvement but includes retinal dystrophy, hepatic fibrosis, polycystic kidney disease and polydactyly (Brancati et al. 2010; Parisi and Glass 1993; Romani et al. 2013; Sayer et al. 2006; Valente et al. 2013). The prevalence of JS is approximately 1 in 100,000 of live births worldwide. From the currently known JS genes, TMEM67 is the most frequent disease causing gene in European and Japanese patients (Bachmann-Gagescu et al. 2015; Kroes et al. 2016; Suzuki et al. 2016) and is one of the most frequent cause of JS with renal involvement (Fleming et al. 2017). CEP290 is also a frequent cause of JS associated with kidney phenotypes (Bachmann-Gagescu et al. 2015; Vilboux et al. 2017). Here we report a patient from Kosovo with a clinical diagnosis of JS with kidney and retinal involvement in whom we identified a homozygous frameshift mutation in CEP290.
The Institutional Review Board of Department of Paediatrics, Clinical University Center, Kosovo, approved this work. The parents of the patient provided their written informed consent before clinical and laboratory examinations and for publication of the case. Blood from the patient and their healthy parents were obtained to allow DNA extraction and genetic studies. All the procedures performed in the study were in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration.
The female patient (JBTS-2) was born to a not knowingly consanguineous couple from Kosovo. The patient had three healthy siblings, two older sisters and one younger brother. During antenatal scans, ill-defined brain morphology changes were noted. Following birth, via Caesarean section at 38 weeks gestation, the birth weight was 3460 g, length 50 cm, and head circumference 35 cm. Following birth, the baby became dyspnoeic and cyanotic, and was treated with oxygen therapy (FiO2 30%). Externally, there were no dysmorphic signs. At age of 1 year, the child had evidence of poor growth: weight 7610 g (below 5th percentile), height 75 cm (below 25th percentile), head circumference 48 cm (below 5th percentile). At 2 years of age, the child demonstrated features of developmental delay and was unable to sit or walk. She had started mumbling at the age of 18 months but did not develop any coherent speech. She had horizontal gaze nystagmus and ptosis in right eye. Abdominal ultrasound scanning showed enlarged, hyperechoic kidneys with loss of corticomedullary differentiation, with a number of small cysts up to 12 mm in diameter. There was evidence of progressive chronic kidney disease with serum creatinine 243 μmol/L. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head and neck suggested a Dandy Walker anomaly and a typical “molar tooth sign”. Eye examination revealed severe retinal dystrophy and ptosis of the right eyelid (Table 1). Molecular genetic analysis using exome sequencing and Sanger sequence confirmation revealed a homozygous frameshift mutations c.5493delA; p.A1832fs*19 in CEP290 (Figure 1). This variant segregated from each parent.
A. Pedigree diagram; squares, males; circles, females; shaded, affected. B. Photograph of proband aged 3 years, showing right ptosis. C. Brain MRI demonstrating molar tooth sign (arrowed). D. Abdominal MRI demonstrating bilateral enlarged kidneys. E. Sanger sequencing showing homozygous pathogenic frameshift mutation segregating from each parent. F. gnomAD frequencies of pathogenic allele CEP290 NM_25114 c.5493delA; A1832Pfs*19 and CEP290 protein showing domain structure and location of frameshift mutation which truncates C-terminal domains.
JS originally was described in 1968 in a Canadian French family an index patient showing malformation of the cerebellar vermis, with intellectual disability, ataxia, abnormal eye movements, and episodic hyperpnoea (Brancati et al. 2010; Joubert et al. 1969). JS has several phenotypic subtypes including “pure” JS, JS with ocular defects, JS with renal defects, JS oculorenal disorders, JS with hepatic disorders and JS with orofaciodigital defects. Of the known 34 genes implicated in JS, 33 genes are autosomal recessive, and one is X-linked (Coene et al. 2009; Parisi 2009). The most striking clinical features for JS are episodic hyperpnoea and apnoea during the neonatal period, ocular disorders, hypotonia truncal ataxia, developmental delay and intellectual impairment (Kumar et al. 2007; Poretti et al. 2011).
Biallelic variants in CEP290 were originally described in families with Joubert syndrome with cerebello-retinal- renal phenotypes (Sayer et al. 2006). Subsequently, CEP290 mutations have been associated with a wide phenotypic spectrum that includes Leber congenital amaurosis, Senior Løken syndrome, Joubert syndrome, Meckel syndrome and Bardet Biedl syndrome (Valente et al. 2013). Despite the identification and reporting of large numbers of CEP290 pathogenic alleles, mutations, no clear genotype-phenotype correlations have been established. Therefore the ability to predictive preicise phenotypes and outcomes of patients with CEP290 pathogenic alleles remains limited (Coppieters et al. 2010). Even with two loss of function alleles the phenotype can be limited to Leber congenital amaurosis in some cases and lead to JS in others (Perrault et al. 2007).
Here we report a patient with a molar tooth sign on brain MRI imaging with retinal and kidney involvement in whom we found using exome sequencing a homozygous frameshift mutation in CEP290 (NM_025114.4 c.5493delA; p.A1832fs*19, ClinVar https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/56739/). This variant, located in exon 29 and predicted to truncate the C-terminus of the CEP290 protein (Figure 1), has been identified in a wide spectrum of ciliopathy phenotypes from Leber congenital amaurosis (Carss et al. 2017; Cideciyan et al. 2011; Coppieters et al. 2010; Feldhaus et al. 2020), JS with renal and retinal involvement (Travaglini et al. 2009) and Meckel syndrome (Frank et al. 2008; Tallila et al. 2009) (Table 2). Interestingly, of these families with Meckel syndrome and the CEP290 c.5493delA allele, one consanguineous multiplex family and a second consanguineous family, not knowingly related to the first, were from the Kosovo-Albanian region suggesting this allele might be a recurrent or founder allele from this population. The lack of genotype-phenotype even with this exact variant in families from the same geographical region is noteworthy. The previously reported cases with the homozygous c.5493delA allele in CEP290 had a classical Meckel syndrome phenotype whilst the case we present here is typical for a multisystem JS. Clearly, there may be modifier alleles or unknown factors influencing the phenotype, and CEP290 provides a good example of a gene where genotype-phenotype correlations are absent (Coppieters et al. 2010). There is some evidence of a modifier allele for the kidney phenotype relating to CEP290 mutations (Ramsbottom et al. 2020), but the neurological variability remains unexplained.
Case ID | Clinical phenotype | Second CEP290 allele | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
JBTS-2 | Joubert syndrome | Homozygous c.5493delA | This report |
CEP290_21 | Leber congenital amaurosis | Compound heterozygous with c.5587-1G>C | (Feldhaus et al. 2020) |
G001347 | Retinal dystrophy | N/A | (Carss et al. 2017) |
P8 | Leber congenital amaurosis | Compound heterozygous with c.2991+1655A>G | (Cideciyan et al. 2011) |
LCA-16 | Leber congenital amaurosis | Compound heterozygous with p.Cys998* | (Coppieters et al. 2010) |
COR001 | Joubert syndrome | Compound heterozygous with del ex 42-54 | (Travaglini et al. 2009) |
N/A - 2 families | Meckel syndrome | Compound heterozygous with 5489delA | (Tallila et al. 2009) |
Index family and Family 972 | Meckel syndrome$ | Homozygous c.5493delA | (Frank et al. 2008) |
$ Two consanguineous families of Kosovar-Albanian origin. Fetuses from the index family had classical features of MKS including grossly enlarged cystic dysplastic kidneys, hepatobiliary ductal plate malformation, postaxial polydactyly, and occipital meningoencephalocele. Fetuses from Family 972 had cystic dysplastic kidneys, postaxial hexadactyly of the left hand, microcephaly with anoccipital meningoencephalocele and hepatobiliary ductal plate malformation was present in the first affected fetus.
In conclusion, JS is often a multi-organ primary ciliopathy syndrome and patients should undergo a clinical and imaging diagnostic protocol to evaluate possible different abnormalities (Bachmann-Gagescu et al. 2020) and genetic testing to allow identification of the underlying cause. Our results highlight the importance of combining clinical and radiological features of JS with molecular genetic analysis to allow a precise diagnosis of JS. An accurate diagnosis helps in genetic counselling, early management of genetic disorders and offers prenatal diagnosis as an option for future pregnancies. It also allows genotype-phenotype correlations to be determined and allows new information to be gained regarding population specific disease alleles.
The original contributions presented in the study are publicly available on LOVD (Fokkema et al. 2011). This data can be found here: https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/individuals/00402012.
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).
The Institutional Review Board of Department of Paediatrics, Clinical University Center, Kosovo, approved this work. The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by North-East Newcastle and North Tyneside 1 Research Ethics Committee (18/NE/350). Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin. Written informed consent was obtained from the minor(s)’ legal guardian/next of kin for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.
The study was conceived and designed by JS. JS, LS, EB, TL and GT contributed to the acquisition, analysis of data, and writing the first draft. LS contributed to collecting the data and communicated with the patient’s family. JS contributed to molecular genetic studies and in silico analysis. The final version was edited by JS. All authors edited and approved the final manuscript.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Human Genetics
Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?
Yes
Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?
Yes
Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?
Yes
Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Genetics/Ciliopathies
Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?
Yes
Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?
Yes
Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?
Partly
Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Human Genetics
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 2 (revision) 31 Mar 23 |
read | |
Version 1 04 Apr 22 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)