Novel behavioral model in evaluating initiation and sustenance of teeth brushing behavior among students pursuing health sciences: a cross-sectional study

Introduction

Dental plaque has been attributed as the leading cause for dental caries and periodontal disease. Loe in 1965 was the forerunner in identifying dental plaque as the cause for development of gingivitis and periodontitis if oral hygiene habits were stopped¹ Oral hygiene maintenance is a crucial and integral feature in determining the overall wellbeing of a person. An effective and efficient plaque control program at the individual and group level is the need of the hour in preventive dentistry.² Tooth brushing is the most important aspect of a competent plaque control program.³ Hence, dental professionals worldwide recommend brushing twice daily as an effective measure for maintenance of oral hygiene.²

There is a progressive focus in research on behavioural theories and their effective and applicable action on initiation and sustenance of a beneficial health behaviour among the populace. Sharma et al. in the year 2015, designed a novel theory, called the multi-theory model (MTM), which discusses two important aspects of health behaviour change the first being initiation and second sustenance.⁴ The theory imbibes distinct characters such as cognitive, conative and environmental factors from theories that are presently in practice, at group, community and individual levels.⁴

In this theory, Sharma et al. suggest that three constructs govern the initiation of a behaviour. The first construct, originated from the Freire’s model of adult education⁵ and is called “participatory dialogue”. The second construct is obtained from Bandura’s self-efficacy⁶ and Ajzen’s perceived behavioural control⁷ and is termed ‘behavioural confidence’. The last construct regulating health behaviour initiation is called “changes in physical environment”. The foundations of this final construct are Bandura’s construct of environment,⁸ Prochaska’s construct of environmental re-evaluation⁹ and environmental factors in Fishbein’s integrative model.¹⁰ In continuum, there are three separate constructs that regulate sustenance. “Emotional transformation” is the first construct, taking origin from the self-motivation construct of emotional intelligence theory. This domain states that collecting or gathering one’s emotions and translating or reconstructing them towards the orientation of the change in behaviour, is imperative to accomplishing the said modification.^4,11,12 Freire’s adult education model’s praxis contributes to the second construct of health behaviour change continuation, that is termed “practise for change”.¹³ The third construct of sustenance is “change is social environment”, this is a derivative of construct of environment, facilitating relationships, communal support and so on.⁴

It has been established time and again, that interventions for health promotion at public health level derived from theoretical models based on social and behavioural sciences have a superior effectiveness as compared to the ones without a theoretical background.¹⁴ Hence the objective of this study was to evaluate the factors effecting MTM in initiation and sustenance of twice daily brushing behaviour among students pursuing health sciences using a questionnaire derived from the MTM theory and correlating the MTM theory with socio-demographic and behavioural patterns among the participants. This is the first novel attempt to assess the efficacy of the MTM in the field of dentistry.

Methods

The study was carried out in the city of Mangaluru, Karnataka, India. The study was conducted in June 2019. Participants included undergraduate students from year one to year five pursuing Medicine and Dentistry in a university setting. A cross-sectional design was used to evaluate the attitude of the participants towards their oral health and intentions to maintain the habit of brushing two times a day using MTM theory and correlating MTM theory with socio-demographic and behavioural pattern among the participants.

Results

Of the 235 participants in the study, 229 completed the questionnaire with 6 questionnaires deemed incomplete for analysis with a response rate of 97 percent. Participant’s mean age was 20.70 years with standard deviation of 1.6 years. Higher participation was seen from the dental students (70%) as compared to the medical students. The highest responses were received from first (n= 65) and third (n=59) year students followed by second years (n=43), fourth years (n=39) and interns (n=23). The majority of the participants were hostel residents. A small number of participants worked for financial gain in the form of internships and part-time jobs. Table 1 demonstrates there was a significant association between the participants from medical and dental stream (p<0.001). The academic year also showed significant association between tooth brushing and MTM scores, the post hoc test showed that interns showed the maximum association between MTM scores followed by third years and first years. (mean MTM scores according to academic year: First year 82.58, second year 76.98, third year 83.17, fourth year 81.03 and interns 91.09)³¹

The data were grouped according to the number of times they brushed twice daily in the week into quartiles with participants who did not brush twice daily even once that entire week, participants who brushed twice daily at least one to three times that week, participants who brushed twice daily at least four to six times in that week and participants who brushed twice daily every day of that week were categorized into four groups. Table 2 showed a significant association between brushing quartiles, professional streams (p<0.001) and academic performance. People with higher academic grades were brushing twice daily for more days in a week than with students with lower academic grades. brushing twice daily every day of the week with brushing (p<0.035) no significant association was observed with year of study.

A one-way ANOVA was carried out to compare the effect of the (independent variable) number of times a participant brushes twice daily during the week on the (dependent variable) MTM scale. As seen in Table 3 there was a significant correlation between the number of times a participant brushes twice daily during the week and the MTM scale (p<0.05) for the three conditions [F (3, 225)=15.699, p<0.001]

Dunnett’s post hoc test was done as variance was assumed equal (Levene’s test p=0.264). Analysis revealed that participants who brushed twice daily every day in the week reported highly significant values when answering the MTM questionnaire for brushing habits (mean MTM=92.15). Lower scores were observed for those who brushed twice daily four to six or less times in the week (mean MTM=83.18), followed by those who brushed twice daily one to three or less times in the week mean (MTM=78.67), and who never brushed twice daily in the week (mean MTM=75.74). Dunnett’s post hoc analyses revealed significant differences between all groups (p<0.05).

Discussion

The objective of this study was to predict the factors leading to the initiation and sustenance of brushing twice daily behaviour using the constructs of the MTM among college students pursuing health sciences. The theory states that health behaviour change can be measured by two aspects i.e initiation and sustenance of the behaviour. MTM theory is applied in many contexts in modifying behaviour in the field of physical activity, dietetics and smoking cessation. With such varied use this is, to our knowledge, the first use of this theory in dentistry.^11,12,18,19 The instrument was designed in English instead of the local colloquial dialect keeping in mind the feasibility and practicality of using the MTM. A reliability and validity analysis of the questionnaire was assessed in a pilot study in a similar population. The participants who were a part of the pilot study were not included in the main study. Reliability analysis reported a Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.892. Split-half reliability and Guttman split-half reliability were found to be 0.779 and 0.677, respectively. Test-retest reliability was measured to be 0.779 (p<0.01).²⁰

A total of 45 out of 68 (66%) medical students who answered the questionnaire reported they brushed twice daily less than 3 times a week. In contrast, only 78 out of 161 (48%) dental students brushed twice daily less than 3 times a week. The reason for this could be that dental students were more aware about oral hygiene measures and followed them regularly when compared to their medical counter parts. Similar findings were noted by Cortes et al.²¹ However, Zadik et al. in their study to test oral self-care habits of dental and healthcare providers in Israel revealed that dental and medical practitioners had similar frequencies of brushing twice daily which are not in compliance with the finding of the current study.¹⁰ However Zadik et al. did show overall dental practitioners had a better oral hygiene maintenance practices compared to medical practitioners.²² Kumar et al. while testing the dental health behavior in correlation to caries status among medical and dental undergraduate students in India, observed that 56.4% dental students brushed twice daily and only 38.5% medical students brushed twice daily, thus supporting the results of the present study.²³

The relation between brushing habits and class year was significant. In total 56% of first years and 64% second year students revealed that they brushed twice daily less than 3 times a week. Whereas less than 50% of clinical students (years 3, 4 and interns) reported that they brushed twice daily less than 3 times a week. As the participant advances in class year, their understanding regarding oral hygiene behavior also improves, suggesting a strong relation between the two variables. Ozalp et al. reported that oral health knowledge among dental students in Turkey was significantly higher among fifth year students as compared to fourth years thus supporting the findings of the current study.²⁴

A significant relation between MTM scale and course (Medical or Dental) was also observed. Of the 68 medical students, 24 (35%) of them have received a score of ranging 81-120 on the MTM scale, whereas 116 out of 161 (77%) dental students have a score of 81-120 on the MTM scale. Hence, dental students in the study are more likely to brush twice daily when compared with medical students. A significant relation was observed between academic year and MTM scale as 87% interns scored in the range of 81-120 on the MTM scale. Whereas only 64% first years and 50% of second years revealed similar scores on the MTM scale. Hence fifth year (interns) students have a higher chance of initiating and sustaining the behavior of brushing twice daily when compared to earlier academic years which is similar to the earlier findings.

While using the MTM to predict initiation and sustenance of physical activity among college students, Nahar et al reported values to be much lesser in comparison to the present study.¹² While assessing the multi theory model to predict initiation and sustenance of a small portion diet among college students, Sharma et al. also reported values to be much less in comparison to the present study.¹¹ The reason for this may be that physical activity or maintaining a small portion diet may not be considered as compulsory behaviours and may not be followed by many. On the other hand, brushing is mostly considered as an obligatory activity, thus suggesting the increase in the values of the descriptive analysis. Hence, the MTM fits well to predict the initiation and sustenance of brushing twice daily.

The stepwise Hierarchical regression model suggested that behavioral confidence was the main factor among all demographics, domains of MTM and associated factors, which was followed by academics and sleeping habits. The behavioral confidence domain enquired about their level of confidence and conviction of participants to brush twice daily and as explained by Sharma.⁴ This domain pertains to changing a health behavior so it is not about the immediate present but about perceivable future. Many previous studies based on smoking cessation and diet have demonstrated a strong affiliation to this domain.¹⁸ Behavioral confidence seems to form an important foundation in initiation of any behavioral change in a population. The intention to brush and ‘social influences’ and ‘self-efficacy’ are also important indicators for brushing in children and adolescent population and are broadly part of behavioral confidence.^25–27

The academic performance and oral hygiene are also subject of debate as it is observed in some studies that academic performance along many behavioral factors contribute to initiation of brushing in children and adolescents and might be related to their intelligence and application of the same to improve health behavior.^28,29 Sleeping habits are also an important factor in a twice daily brushing routine; studies have proved that brushing at night is an important factor in achieving good quality sleep in children and adolescents.³⁰

Conclusions

The multi theory model is a good tool in predicting the initiation and sustenance of twice daily brushing behaviour among college students pursuing health sciences. All construct of initiation and sustenance significantly influence the prediction of carrying out brushing behaviour and brushing habits of the participants, as students’ progress through their classes in the dental and medical schools they are more likely to indulge in good brushing habits. This may be due to improved knowledge on the subject. This study definitely opens further vistas of research in utilising this novel theory in differing venues in the field of dentistry.

Data availability