Keywords
India, Health Technology Assessment, Universal Health Coverage, narrative review
This article is included in the Manipal Academy of Higher Education gateway.
This article is included in the Health Services gateway.
India, Health Technology Assessment, Universal Health Coverage, narrative review
“Universal health coverage” (UHC) as defined by the World Health Organisation (WHO) is “ensuring that all people have access to needed health services of sufficient quality to be effective while also ensuring that the use of these services does not expose the user the financial hardship” (UHC for Sustainable Development). UHC is fundamental to achieving the “Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) three that aims at ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all at all ages” (UHC for Sustainable Development). The government of India is committed towards providing UHC to its 1.3 billion population by initiating improvement in the availability, affordability and quality of health services as highlighted in the last “12th five-year plan (2012–2017)”. The challenging task of providing healthcare to all its citizens is possible with optimal utilisation of resources.1,2
Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is a multifaceted approach for informing policy by considering social, medical, economic and ethical aspects in a systematic and transparent manner.2–5 HTA ensures that technology choices are well informed by consideration of evolving technologies, scientific evidence, effectiveness regarding patient-relevant benefits, unintended harmful effects, cost-effectiveness, social values and ethical and legal implications.3–7 Therefore, HTA supports decision-making and prioritisation of limited resources in order to implement and achieve a sustainable UHC and subsequently SDG 3. For the aforesaid reasons, the global development agencies, WHO, World Bank and other agencies are persuading healthcare authorities to use HTA as it is a prerequisite for priority-setting for mobilising the healthcare resources.5 HTA has been included by the government of India as a systematic tool for priority-setting and allocation of resources so that the questions related to ‘what’ to provide to ‘which’ population or subset of population and ‘how much’ to provide can be answered. As India is a diverse country with different health problems and healthcare demands, the provision of any healthcare policy and health technology should be based on many factors that include expected benefits, harms, financial, social, cultural, ethical and legal aspects. Such a comprehensive assessment is possible with the approach of HTA.
The growing demand and interest in HTA in India can be observed through the published literature and the healthcare reforms undertaken by the Indian government e.g., investment in HTA for streamlining evidence-informed decision-making and effective healthcare spending. Previously published literature included topics such as the importance of HTA and recommendations to strengthen HTA in India,7–9 the status of HTA policymaking in India,10 the need for an HTA database,11 and an instrument to map the status of HTA in some selected countries.12 As we progress ahead, the previous literature becomes outdated, and therefore, the objective of this narrative review is to summarise the status of HTA in India based on the currently available information. This will assist HTA organisations, clinical guideline developers, finance providers, industry, research institutions, patient organisations and other stakeholders in assessing the development of HTA to strengthen prospects.
A literature search was undertaken in PubMed and Google Scholar to identify articles related to HTA in India. Additionally, a search was conducted for grey literature on government websites of the “Ministry of Health and Family Welfare”, “Health Technology Assessment in India” (HTAIn), “Department of Health Research” (DHR) and the “International Decision Support Initiative” (IDSi). The search was conducted in August 2019 and updated in March 2021. Reviews or reports describing the status and process of HTA in India were included.
India has a complex healthcare system that includes public and the dominant private sector. Information on the healthcare system and healthcare expenditure in India can be found in the extended data.13 With only 1.2% of “Gross Domestic Product” (GDP) spent on the public health infrastructure, the provision of UHC is an ambitious feat, especially at a time of rising burden of non-communicable diseases in India in addition to infectious diseases (including COVID-19) and malnourishment.14 Government health spending as GDP (%) in India is similar to Indonesia (1.1% of GDP)15 but, lower than other low- and middle-income countries such as Bhutan (2.5% of GDP)16 and contrastingly different than that of 7.3% of the GDP in the UK.17 Therefore, prioritising resources based on evidence becomes important for improving efficiency and to get the maximum value for money.18 To address problems of inequitable and unaffordable healthcare and to move towards more effective allocation of resources, the government of India has shifted its focus towards the concept of HTA. Discussions about HTA have been incorporated in the government policies, viz. the 12th five-year plan and the National Health Policy.2,19
In India, it was stated that HTA, via a viable HTA system, would help in the decision-making process for allocation and proper utilisation of resources. It will provide more transparency related to treatment options for different patients with the same disease.8 HTA provides evidence about the effectiveness and affordability of newer drugs and technologies by comparison of the risks and costs, therefore, providing information about the indications of use for a newly introduced health technology to medical practitioners.20 The other applications for HTA in India include supporting development of a pricing strategy for newer drugs and technology for the entire nation or state; thereby helping in providing value-based pricing for the drugs and technology.1,18 Additionally, it will support in preparation of clinical practice guidelines for maximum efficiency of interventions.18 HTA assists the government in priority decision-making, and during purchase of health services from the private health sector. It is beneficial for providing evidence related to equity and social justice, which are important areas to focus on while making decisions regarding priority-setting for allocation of resources.1 The users and producers of HTA evidence in India are given in Figure 1.1,21
For institutionalising HTA and to support transparent evidence informed decision-making process, the DHR, India, established HTAIn in January 2017, which was formerly known as the “Medical Technology Assessment Board” (DHR HTAIn). HTAIn conducts full HTAs (various methodologies) upon receiving requests from the different central and state departments. HTAIn aids these departments with scientific evidence for proper resource allocation and priority-setting.
HTAIn consists of three core bodies, the “HTAin Secretariat”, the “HTAIn Technical Appraisal Committee” or “HTAIn Technical Advisory Committee”, and the “HTAIn Board”. “Regional Resource Hubs” (RRH) and “Technical Partners” (TPs) are academic and research institutions, usually under the government (Central or State), which have capacity, expertise and experience in HTA. RRH and TPs are explained in detail under the section HTA networks in India.13 The user departments are the central and state health ministries, or any government healthcare provider or agency that are directly or indirectly involved in the health sector in India. The structure of the HTAIn is depicted in Figure 2.21 The detailed information about the HTAIn core bodies is given in the extended data.13
HTA must be rooted firmly in research and scientific method. It employs principles of benefit-harm assessment and economic evaluation to identify beneficial and safe health technologies and allows assessing their incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. The various steps of HTA that are followed by HTAIn are listed in Figure 321; viz. the research proposal must be explicit, relevant and transparent. It must incorporate appropriate methods to assess benefits, harms and costs, safety and address the issues of generalisability and transferability. Table 1 lists the key data sources for HTA in India that are used for conducting HTA analysis.22 All key stakeholder groups should be included in the HTA process. Currently, an HTA undertaken by HTAIn, RRHs or TPs typically takes six months to one year or more for completion, followed by report publication and policy brief. More information on the steps is given in the extended data.13
(Source Downey et al., 201822).
Since 2017, HTAIn has published six policy documents. Priority topics have been researched and the reports are available in the public domain (HTAIn Policy Documents).23 Other examples of HTA conducted in India are: a) HTA conducted by the “National Health System Resource Centre” in 2017 successfully demonstrated a reduction in the average cost of drug eluting cardiac stents from INR 121,000 (Approx. USD 1,650) to INR 29,600 (Approx. USD 405).23 b) To guide policy decisions for health innovations in India, HTA was conducted for one of the health innovations from India i.e. “FnCas9 Editor Linked Uniform Detection Assay” (FELUDA), to test its addition in the COVID testing policy. It was concluded that the FELUDA test was less costly and equally effective as an RT-PCR (“Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction”) test for COVID-19 diagnosis. Future HTAs, using field level effectiveness data were recommended for the FELUDA test, also, it was recommended that the scale up of this test would be more sustainable for the health system.24
The government of India is committed to institutionalising HTA as a part of the priority-setting exercise in the “12th five-year plan”, by the “National Institution for Transforming India (NITI) Aayog”. To achieve this, a “national program for capacity building in HTA” was initiated by the government.25 This was a locally tailored capacity building approach supported by the iDSI, active from June 2015 to 2019. Important components of this capacity building program were 1) Developing a framework for capacity building; 2) Mapping and engaging relevant stakeholders; 3) Assessing need, assets and gaps for capacity building in HTA; 4) Developing a capacity development response; 5) Implementing the capacity development response which was done by environment capacity development i.e., recognition of the political economy of HTA, building HTA capacity building and resource networks in India, developing a central nodal point for HTA in the country (the HTAIn), and individual HTA capacity building training; 6) Evaluating capacity development via a Monitoring Evaluating and Learning Framework; and 7) Measuring the impact of the capacity development program.25 Furthermore, workshops were held for discussing the need of HTA and sensitisation of clinician/stakeholders on evidence-based medicine.7,8
There is an apparent gap in the HTA curriculum in India with few institutions offering HTA as a component in regular undergraduate or higher educational courses. These courses are pertaining to the fields of medical technology, biostatistics, and health economics.26 HTA as an independent curriculum is not offered by any of the institutions across India; however, two medical institutions (“School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research”, Chandigarh and “Amrita Institute of Medical Science”, Kerala jointly with Ruskin University, UK) offer HTA certificate courses through a virtual platform.26
This review was intended to summarise the currently available information on the status of HTA in India. HTA is in the early stages of development and is not a prerequisite for reimbursement by social health insurances such as “Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana” (PM-JAY). There is an absence of information on the consideration and use of HTA during the preparation of PM-JAY packages, costing, premium and reimbursement rates.
The complex health system of India has imposed a challenge for successful application of HTA recommendations.10 Furthermore, the healthcare market in India is diverse and unregulated, and it may influence the implementation of HTA regulations. Political ideology influences decision-making related to resource allocation and use of technology in healthcare.27 There is a high data requirement for conducting HTA analysis; absence of a robust data infrastructure might prove to be an important challenge.10,27 Limited human resource capacity for health economics, mathematical modelling and evidence synthesis is an impediment. Other challenges are quality of data and data availability (e.g., non-availability of quality of life tariff), tackling transparency and ethical aspects of the data, refusal to comply with guidelines by stakeholders.10,27 The “National Health System Cost Database” was introduced in 2016, for conducting costing studies and economic evaluations by collecting data based on standard methodology.28 A pan-India “Cost of Healthcare Services in India study” has been commissioned by the DHR to reduce the gaps related to price setting and estimation of resource requirements. The findings of aforesaid study will be added to the “National Health System Cost Database”.29 Additionally, challenges for implementation of HTA in India are: questionable health system readiness, high out-of-pocket expenditure, appropriate dissemination of information, perspective of the medical and allied health professional communities, availability of mechanisms for monitoring and evaluation.1,19 Some of the barriers to institutionalisation of HTA, which complicate priority-setting were identified as multiple insurance schemes, fragmented healthcare, and rising healthcare costs.30
As mentioned by the “International Working Group for HTA Advancement”, an important aspect of HTA is its link to decision-making.3,4,31,32 Although there is a manual on how to perform HTA prepared by the DHR, there is no clarity on whether HTA information is considered for translating evidence into policy or practice. HTA in India is a relatively new concept and the processes are not streamlined as compared to countries where HTA is established. The mechanism or checklists for quality assessment of HTA reports in India is not available in the public domain. The “International Network of Agencies for Health Technology” (INAHTA) has developed a checklist for the assessment of HTA quality and is being used during preparation and assessing credibility of HTA for policy and practice (INAHTA Briefs, Checklists & Impact Frameworks). It does not provide an overall score for HTA, but indicates the necessary components, which should be present in the HTA report. There is no evidence of a legislation on HTA in India and absence of long-term academic courses or trainings on HTA.30
To achieve UHC, the government of India has planned to purchase health services from the private sector as one of its key strategies (considering it being an important stakeholder), thereby involving the private sector in the entire process. HTA will be used for prioritisation of the health services that are needed to be purchased from the private sector. The reaction of the private sector to the entire process is yet to be seen.1
The strength of this review is that it collates latest developments of HTA in India including comprehensive information about HTAIn. The consolidated information provided, can be utilised by researchers and stakeholders working in HTA. However, this review has limitations. First, our literature search was restricted to selected databases, and to English language publications, which may lead to a substantial selection bias. Second, several important documents may not be published through journals or websites, leading to a potential publication bias. We tried to limit this risk by including grey literature in our review. We may have missed aspects that are important today or in the future. Fourth, the included studies had their own weaknesses limiting the information in our review. For example, the information within the reports and studies were heavily focused on the expert opinion and there is possibility that the experts might have been chosen through personal contacts.
India needs strong political commitment to introduce and maintain HTA. To make healthcare decision-making a transparent process, patient and public involvement (PPI) in such decision-making is an encouraging step. PPI in healthcare (e.g., HTA process) can give more insights into quality of life and problems they encounter. Additionally, it helps in making people aware of the healthcare-related cost and challenges, thereby enhancing group and individual responsibility towards health.33 In addition to the demand generation by HTAIn, states can prioritise topics for HTA, as they are responsible for health financing.27 The HTAIn should publish reports on the use of HTA in the country, which will help in understanding the impact of HTA in India. Similarly, HTA can be used for appropriately calculating reimbursement packages under PM-JAY and other health insurance in India. Making HTA mandatory for health insurance, the pharmaceutical industry and the medical device industry can bring transparency in pricing of drugs and devices.23
The quality assessment checklists from countries with established HTA (such as a checklist by INHATA) can be localised to Indian settings. Countries (such as India) at the formative stages of HTA processes can learn from the experience of nations where HTA is well-established. However, the methods followed in other countries with established HTA should be adopted with caution for India because of contextual diversity.27 Further research and action should focus on the extent of coverage, utility and quality of HTA, barriers to implementing HTA in India, and comparing HTA processes between countries, especially in the south Asian region. In addition, systematic education on HTA should be increased and a curriculum including the Indian HTA process should be developed.27 Training programmes for capacity building of human resources can help overcoming the shortage of trained manpower.
The path to a robust healthcare system built on the foundation of explicit evidence, evidence-based research and cost-effectiveness, and more transparent decision processes might be lengthy, but it holds a prominent future for the healthcare of India.
Figshare: Extended data for ‘Latest developments and scope of Health Technology Assessment in India: Tapping into the future’, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19203245.v1.13
This project contains the following extended data:
• Healthcare system in India
• Healthcare expenditure in India
• Administrative structure of HTAIn in India
• Methods for conducting HTA in India
• A figure explaining the process of selecting HTA topic by HTAIn
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0)
We would like to acknowledge Public Health Evidence South Asia, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education for the logistics and administrative support.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the topic of the review discussed comprehensively in the context of the current literature?
No
Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?
No
Is the review written in accessible language?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn appropriate in the context of the current research literature?
Partly
References
1. Mukherjee K: Cost-effectiveness of Childbirth Strategies for Prevention of Mother-to-child Transmission of HIV Among Mothers Receiving Nevirapine in India.Indian J Community Med. 2010; 35 (1): 29-33 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Public Health, Health Policy, Economic Evaluation, Health System Analysis, HTA, Pharmaeconomics. Detailed research interests can be viewed at: https://tiss.edu/view/9/employee/kanchan-mukherjee/
Is the topic of the review discussed comprehensively in the context of the current literature?
Partly
Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?
No
Is the review written in accessible language?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn appropriate in the context of the current research literature?
Yes
References
1. Prinja S, Chauhan AS, Angell B, Gupta I, et al.: A Systematic Review of the State of Economic Evaluation for Health Care in India.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015; 13 (6): 595-613 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Health economics
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 27 Apr 22 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)