The influence of strategic innovation management on firm innovation performance in the Indonesian mid-size telecommunication industry

Risris Rismayani; Bram Manuel; Umi Latifah

doi:10.12688/f1000research.121673.2

Home Browse The influence of strategic innovation management on firm innovation...

ALL Metrics

-

Views

-

Downloads

Get PDF

Get XML

Export

▬

✚

Research Article

Revised

The influence of strategic innovation management on firm innovation performance in the Indonesian mid-size telecommunication industry

[version 2; peer review: 3 approved with reservations]

Risris Rismayani ¹, Bram Manuel², Umi Latifah¹

PUBLISHED 09 Jan 2023

Author details Author details

¹ School of Economics and Business, Telkom University, Jl. Telekomunikasi No. 1, Bandung, 40257, Indonesia
² PPM School of Management, Jl. Menteng Raya No. 9, Jakarta, 10340, Indonesia

Risris Rismayani
Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Bram Manuel
Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Validation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Umi Latifah
Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing

OPEN PEER REVIEW

REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Background: The telecommunication industry was one of the Indonesian government's priorities in the national development plan 2015-2035. “Primary Industry” was the term for the priority industries with the central role as the prime mover in the future national economy. Various natural, human, technological, innovative, and creative resources were imperative in supporting the underlining national industry development plan. Strategic innovation management refers to the entire sequence of innovation practices, including competition mechanism analysis, such as creating an innovative vision, business strategy alignment, disseminating strategy at an entire organizational level, market tendency, technology, and competitor’s action. Firm innovation performance refers to the measurement of innovation efficiency (the number of new products, product novelty, new product development speed, and new product success rate) and innovation profitability (new product revenue proportion, quality enhancement, cost reduction, and value improvement) conducted by the firm. This study investigates the effect of Innovation Strategy, Organizational Structure, Innovation Culture, Technological Capability, and Customer-Supplier Relationship (these were the practice of Strategic Innovation Management mentioned in various literature) on Firm Innovation Performance.
Methods: A quantitative method, from a practical perspective, was employed to investigate the causal relationship between strategic innovation management and firm innovation performance. Data was gathered through a validated and reliable questionnaire disseminated to 90 respondents. It included a representative from the four sub-sectors of the telecommunication industry, namely fixed networks, wireless networks, telecommunication services, and special telecommunication.
Results: The survey found that firms within the telecommunication industry already employed Strategic Innovation Management practices. Moreover, this study also found that Innovation Culture, Technological Capability, and Customer-Suppler Relationship significantly influence Firm Innovation Performance.
Conclusion:
The implementation of Strategic Innovation Management in the mid-size companies within Indonesia's telecommunication industry appears to be relatively high. It indicates that firms within the industry were able to strategically compete by implementing Strategic Innovation Management.

Keywords

Firm Innovation Performance, Innovation Culture, Technological Capability, Customer and Supplier Relationship, Innovation Strategy, Organizational Capability

Corresponding author: Risris Rismayani

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information: This work was funded with Internal Research Grant from Telkom University, Indonesia, grant number KWR4.035/PNLT2/PPM-LIT/2021, received by Risris Rismayani.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Copyright: © 2023 Rismayani R et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite: Rismayani R, Manuel B and Latifah U. The influence of strategic innovation management on firm innovation performance in the Indonesian mid-size telecommunication industry [version 2; peer review: 3 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2023, 11:956 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.121673.2) First published: 18 Aug 2022, 11:956 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.121673.1) Latest published: 09 Jan 2023, 11:956 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.121673.2)

Revised Amendments from Version 1

The revised version of the manuscript contains an updated version of the Introduction section that strengthen the problem definition, with additional improvement in the theoretical review that supports the hypotheses in the study.

To read any peer review reports and author responses for this article, follow the "read" links in the Open Peer Review table.

XML processing error : Illegal HTML character: decimal 146

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2

VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 18 Aug 2022

Author details Author details

¹ School of Economics and Business, Telkom University, Jl. Telekomunikasi No. 1, Bandung, 40257, Indonesia
² PPM School of Management, Jl. Menteng Raya No. 9, Jakarta, 10340, Indonesia

Risris Rismayani
Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Bram Manuel
Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Validation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Umi Latifah
Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing

Competing interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information

This work was funded with Internal Research Grant from Telkom University, Indonesia, grant number KWR4.035/PNLT2/PPM-LIT/2021, received by Risris Rismayani.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Article Versions (2)

version 2

Revised

Published: 09 Jan 2023, 11:956

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.121673.2

version 1

Published: 18 Aug 2022, 11:956

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.121673.1

Copyright

© 2023 Rismayani R et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Download

Export To

metrics

	Views	Downloads
F1000Research	-	-
PubMed Central Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.	-	-

Citations

0

SEE MORE DETAILS

CITE

how to cite this article

Rismayani R, Manuel B and Latifah U. The influence of strategic innovation management on firm innovation performance in the Indonesian mid-size telecommunication industry [version 2; peer review: 3 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2023, 11:956 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.121673.2)

NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

track

receive updates on this article

Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?

Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE

ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested

Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.

Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Version 2

VERSION 2

PUBLISHED 09 Jan 2023

Revised

Views

11

Reviewer Report 25 Sep 2023

Yuen-Onn Choong, Faculty of Business and Finance, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Kampar, Malaysia

Approved with Reservations

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.142350.r208259

Thank you for allowing me to review the paper entitled "The influence of strategic innovation management on firm innovation performance in the Indonesian mid-size telecommunication industry" Here are some suggestions to improve the paper:

Authors should

Thank you for allowing me to review the paper entitled "The influence of strategic innovation management on firm innovation performance in the Indonesian mid-size telecommunication industry" Here are some suggestions to improve the paper:

Authors should provide a thorough explanation of why there is a need to examine this study and test the relationship between innovation management and innovation performance. What triggers the authors to conduct such a study? Thus, the introduction of the study needs further clarification to establish a strong rationale for the research. Please make a stronger case as to why your paper is needed and how you contribute to current academic discussion. You should be more convincing and use the current literature review to indicate the gap that needs to be closed. You have to explain why the gap matters. Why is the gap a real concern? What will go wrong if the gap is unaddressed? The authors need to explain better what is the main puzzle their research is addressing. I could not clearly understand what the gap in the literature is and how this research is helping us close this gap. Thus, better paper positioning is needed.
Authors should refer to relevant past studies to highlight deficiencies or gaps in the existing literature. The authors should offer a more comprehensive analysis of the limitations present in previous studies. By doing so, the author can provide valuable insights into how your own research diverges from and addresses those gaps. This will help establish the novelty and unique contributions of their study, especially the theoretical aspect.
The procedure of data collection needs to be elaborated further. The authors should explain in more detail how authors collected this data, how authors approached the respondents, and how authors identified participants for the survey study. This explanation should be reasonable and logical, avoiding exaggerations and providing a clear account of the steps taken in the data collection process.
I would suggest author structure the conclusion part of the manuscript as follows: (1) Discussion, (2) theoretical Implications, (3) practical implications, (4) Limitations and Future Research Recommendations, and (5) Conclusion.
There should be a standalone section for theoretical implications. What can you infer from the findings? This section should discuss the implications of the study's findings and how they contribute to the existing theoretical knowledge. Summarize the key findings and their relevance to the existing theoretical frameworks or models. Analyze how the findings align with or challenge current theoretical perspectives and concepts (service quality) related to all the key concepts of this study. Discuss any theoretical insights or advancements that the study provides and highlight how the findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the research area.
A standalone section for practical implication is required, the authors should provide valuable insights based on current practices and policies, supported by evidence from their research. To strengthen the practical implications, it is crucial to reference specific findings, data, or examples that demonstrate the validity and reliability of the recommendations. By incorporating this approach, the authors can offer concrete and actionable suggestions that have a solid grounding in their research findings.
Should have a standalone section for limitations and future research recommendations. In this section, the authors should conscientiously identify the potential weaknesses or limitations of the study and provide insightful suggestions for future research directions. By incorporating this standalone section, the paper will not only address its own

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Behavioural studies, tourism studies and environmental behavioural studies

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Version 1

VERSION 1

PUBLISHED 18 Aug 2022

Views

14

Reviewer Report 28 Nov 2022

Antonio Abreu, Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa (ISEL), Lisbon, Portugal

Approved with Reservations

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.133565.r151866

The paper deals with a very interesting topic, and it included interesting ideas. In general, I appreciate the aims of this work. However, I have the following main concerns:

The research question is not well contextualized.

The paper deals with a very interesting topic, and it included interesting ideas. In general, I appreciate the aims of this work. However, I have the following main concerns:

The research question is not well contextualized.
The literature background is poor and underdeveloped.
The limitations of this work deserve a deeper discussion.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Industrial management

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Views

18

Reviewer Report 28 Nov 2022

Ariful Islam, Putra Business School, University of Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang, Malaysia

Approved with Reservations

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.133565.r147973

Try to upgrade your problem statement with more recent citations. The introduction section should include 4 to 6 latest references (2018 to 2022) from well known journals in the field and appropriate extracts from them to motivate the

Try to upgrade your problem statement with more recent citations. The introduction section should include 4 to 6 latest references (2018 to 2022) from well known journals in the field and appropriate extracts from them to motivate the researchers in the subject.
Put more focus on underlying theories of the study.
Develop your conclusion segment (Theoretical contributions + Practical implications + Recommendation)

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

No
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Entrepreneurship, Innovation, Strategy, Small Business

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2

VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 18 Aug 2022

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

	Invited Reviewers
	1	2	3
Version 2 (revision) 09 Jan 23			read
Version 1 18 Aug 22	read	read

Ariful Islam, University of Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang, Malaysia
Antonio Abreu, Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa (ISEL), Lisbon, Portugal
Yuen-Onn Choong, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Kampar, Malaysia

Comments on this article

All Comments(0)

Add a comment

Sign up for content alerts

Browse by related subjects

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

11 Views

25 Sep 2023 | for Version 2

Yuen-Onn Choong, Faculty of Business and Finance, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Kampar, Malaysia

11 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved With Reservations

Thank you for allowing me to review the paper entitled "The influence of strategic innovation management on firm innovation performance in the Indonesian mid-size telecommunication industry" Here are some suggestions to improve the paper:

Authors should provide a thorough explanation of why there is a need to examine this study and test the relationship between innovation management and innovation performance. What triggers the authors to conduct such a study? Thus, the introduction of the study needs further clarification to establish a strong rationale for the research. Please make a stronger case as to why your paper is needed and how you contribute to current academic discussion. You should be more convincing and use the current literature review to indicate the gap that needs to be closed. You have to explain why the gap matters. Why is the gap a real concern? What will go wrong if the gap is unaddressed? The authors need to explain better what is the main puzzle their research is addressing. I could not clearly understand what the gap in the literature is and how this research is helping us close this gap. Thus, better paper positioning is needed.
Authors should refer to relevant past studies to highlight deficiencies or gaps in the existing literature. The authors should offer a more comprehensive analysis of the limitations present in previous studies. By doing so, the author can provide valuable insights into how your own research diverges from and addresses those gaps. This will help establish the novelty and unique contributions of their study, especially the theoretical aspect.
The procedure of data collection needs to be elaborated further. The authors should explain in more detail how authors collected this data, how authors approached the respondents, and how authors identified participants for the survey study. This explanation should be reasonable and logical, avoiding exaggerations and providing a clear account of the steps taken in the data collection process.
I would suggest author structure the conclusion part of the manuscript as follows: (1) Discussion, (2) theoretical Implications, (3) practical implications, (4) Limitations and Future Research Recommendations, and (5) Conclusion.
There should be a standalone section for theoretical implications. What can you infer from the findings? This section should discuss the implications of the study's findings and how they contribute to the existing theoretical knowledge. Summarize the key findings and their relevance to the existing theoretical frameworks or models. Analyze how the findings align with or challenge current theoretical perspectives and concepts (service quality) related to all the key concepts of this study. Discuss any theoretical insights or advancements that the study provides and highlight how the findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the research area.
A standalone section for practical implication is required, the authors should provide valuable insights based on current practices and policies, supported by evidence from their research. To strengthen the practical implications, it is crucial to reference specific findings, data, or examples that demonstrate the validity and reliability of the recommendations. By incorporating this approach, the authors can offer concrete and actionable suggestions that have a solid grounding in their research findings.
Should have a standalone section for limitations and future research recommendations. In this section, the authors should conscientiously identify the potential weaknesses or limitations of the study and provide insightful suggestions for future research directions. By incorporating this standalone section, the paper will not only address its own

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Behavioural studies, tourism studies and environmental behavioural studies

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

14 Views

28 Nov 2022 | for Version 1

Antonio Abreu, Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa (ISEL), Lisbon, Portugal

14 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved With Reservations

The paper deals with a very interesting topic, and it included interesting ideas. In general, I appreciate the aims of this work. However, I have the following main concerns:

The research question is not well contextualized.
The literature background is poor and underdeveloped.
The limitations of this work deserve a deeper discussion.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Industrial management

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

18 Views

28 Nov 2022 | for Version 1

Ariful Islam, Putra Business School, University of Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang, Malaysia

18 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved With Reservations

Try to upgrade your problem statement with more recent citations. The introduction section should include 4 to 6 latest references (2018 to 2022) from well known journals in the field and appropriate extracts from them to motivate the researchers in the subject.
Put more focus on underlying theories of the study.
Develop your conclusion segment (Theoretical contributions + Practical implications + Recommendation)

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

No
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Entrepreneurship, Innovation, Strategy, Small Business

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

Respond to this report

The influence of strategic innovation management on firm innovation performance in the Indonesian mid-size telecommunication industry

Abstract

Keywords

Revised Amendments from Version 1

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

Comments on this article

Browse by related subjects

Competing Interests Policy

Stay Updated