Keywords
congenital deafness, non-syndromic type, school, genetic mutation, pure tone audiometry, hybridization test
This article is included in the Genomics and Genetics gateway.
congenital deafness, non-syndromic type, school, genetic mutation, pure tone audiometry, hybridization test
Hearing loss is a health problem affecting about 6-8% of the population in developing countries and is partly a congenital disability.1 Congenital hearing loss (CHL) is one of the most common disorders in humans, with an incidence of 1-2 out of 1000 newborns.2 Congenital hearing loss can be caused by genetic or environmental factors or the interaction of these two. Genetic factors play about 50-75% as the cause of hearing loss. 30% of congenital hearing loss is syndromic (SHL) with abnormalities in other organ systems, and 70% is non-syndromic. Approximately 600 SHL-related syndromes have been identified, including Usher, Pandred, Stickler, Branchio-to-renal, Down's syndromes, et cetera.2 Based on data from the hereditary hearing loss homepage, 132 mutations genes associated with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL): 51 autosomal dominant (DFNA), 77 autosomal recessive (DFNB), and 5 X-chromosome (DFNX).2,3
Hereditary hearing loss is classified into syndromic and non-syndromic types. The syndromic type accounts for 30% of genetic deafness.4,5 According to World Health Organization (WHO) data, there are 466 million people in the world experiencing a hearing loss (6.1% of the total population), of which 34 million are found in children and 432 million in adults.6 In 2018, 2.6% of the Indonesian population experienced hearing loss. The population with hearing loss in Indonesia is distributed in several age groups, most of which are above 75 years, with a prevalence of 36.6%.7 Congenital hearing loss related to genetic factors is found in two forms, namely: syndromic hearing loss and non-syndromic hearing loss.3 Non-syndromic hearing loss is a hearing loss that is not associated with other physical disorders. Non-syndromic hearing loss can be inherited in autosomal recessive, autosomal dominant, X-chromosome-associated, and mitochondrial inheritance. Non-syndromic hearing loss causes prelingual hearing loss in children with sensorineural types ranging from severe hearing loss to total deafness.4,5
More than 60 genes and some proteins are involved in the pathogenesis of SNHL. To date, mutations in four connexin genes, including Gap Junction Beta 2 (GJB2)/Connexin 26 (Cx26), GJB3 (Cx31), GJB4 (Cx30.3), and GJB6 (Cx30), have been associated with SNHL.4 Research in Surabaya in 2019 reported that changes or variations in the nucleotide G to A at sequence 8473 in the GJB2 gene, changing the encoded amino acid (valine to leucine) were found in patients with Hereditary Hearing Loss in Deaf School type B Surabaya. This was assumed to be related to the occurrence of congenital deafness.6
Genetically inherited hearing loss affects various molecular processes, including gene mutations that interfere with the function of transcription factors, potassium and chloride channels, connexins, and stereocilia. With genetic testing, the identification of mutations can produce an accurate prognosis for deafness. Genetic information can help predict whether the hearing loss will persist or worsen, and determine the type of damage in the hearing system. Furthermore, knowing the degree of damage to the inner ear could help to determine whether the patients need hearing aid or cochlear implant surgery to improve their hearing.7,8
WHO held a multi-nation consultative meeting in Colombo in 2021 and recommended every stakeholder in various countries, especially in the Southeast Asian region to focus on preventive and early detection efforts related to ear health. This meeting was the basis for the Sound Hearing 2030 program to improve the quality of life in the Asian region by developing a right to better hearing program. With this program, it is expected that the prevalence of hearing loss will be reduced approximately 90% by 2030.9
Non-syndromic hearing loss is a problem because there is lack of knowledge of the cause. In contrast, in the syndromic type, the pathophysiology of typical symptoms could be explored. This study aimed to find out the causes of non-syndromic type congenital deafness through a genetic approach; to detect the presence or absence of genetic mutations that caused deafness; to identify specific mutations, and to ascertain how the pattern of inheritance of these mutations.
This study was an analytic observational study using a cross-sectional method. This research was done from February 2021 to December 2021 in Karya Mulya type B special school for the deaf in Surabaya, the capital of East Java province, Indonesia. The study design was an analytic observational study using a cross-sectional method. We (with teachers) invited and explained the research to parents of students by the letter with consent form (see Extended data20). Parents and students who wish to participate sign a consent form. There were 50 students have agreed to participate, out of 138 total population. With simple random sampling, we took 49 students as the sample for the study. Inclusion criteria were the students who attended school, cooperative student, has no history of trauma, viral or bacterial infection related to hearing impairment, has parental consent to participate in the study, and has normal ear anatomy. Students who did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded.
First, we interviewed students and parents accompanied by teachers so that we could communicate and obtain the clinical history of students at Karya Mulya special school. It spent 5 active days to finished 49 students. The clinical history of each subject was explored to ensure that the hearing loss was not a result of acquired environmental factors like infection, trauma, acoustic trauma or ototoxic drugs. All subjects were investigated through physical and otological examinations by an ENT specialist to find the presence of other symptoms that could point to a syndromal type of hearing loss, including diabetes, vision problems, neurological disorders, and skin disorders. Subjects with possible syndromal or acquired hearing loss were excluded from the study. Using standard procedures, the DNA from all patients were extracted from the patient’s blood sample.
The data were obtained from medical record data of the patient, audiometric examinations, blood analysis using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and hybridization, then processed to determine the type of genetic mutation associated with deafness. Pure tone audiometry was performed using an Eartech Resonance r17a-BC Portable Touchscreen Audiometer by ENT doctor, in a room with a noise level of not more than 40 decibels for about 5 to 10 minutes to determine the residual hearing threshold.
The workflow in this research was implemented in three steps: 1) Human DNA Extraction from sample, 2) PCR Amplification, and 3) Hybridization. The Hearing Loss Susceptibility GenoArray Diagnostic Kit contains sufficient reagents for 30 tests.
Human DNA extraction sample can be taken from whole blood, dried blood spot or buccal swab. In our study, 6 ml of patient’s blood. was extracted by the nurse and stored at the cool box. The collected sample was sent for test immediately to the Prodia laboratory for hybridization process. The blood sample can be stored at the cooler with temp 4oC for less than 24 hours or -20°C for less than one month to prevent denaturation.
DNA extraction was executed according to the Hybribio DNA Prep (HBDP) kit instructions book in August 2017 on the revision date. DNA Prep Kit is designed for extracting DNA from whole blood (with anticoagulant) for clinical diagnosis or research purposes. Principle of the test, DNA was released from whole blood using silica spin column DNA purification. This kit contents of solution L (<10%GuSCN, <10%Tris), solution P (<1% KH2PO4, <1%NaCl), solution W1 (<10% GuSCN, <1% EDTA), solution W2 (sterilized deionized water), TE Elutin buffer (<1% Tris, <1% EDTA) and protease K (<2% protease K). Test procedures:
1. Add 200μl anticoagulant blood sample into a 1.5ml-eppendorf tube. If the sample is less than 200μl, add Solution P into the sample to mark it up to 200μl.
2. Add 20μl Protease K into the blood sample, and shake to mix well
3. Add 200μl of Solution L, vortex the sample (we use Thermolyne Maxi Mix II Vortexer), then place it in a 56°C water bath or electronic hot bath for 15-20min with a digital block heater.
4. Add 200μl of ethanol and mix well. Insert one 2ml-centrifugal filter tube in one collection tube, transfer the sample into the 2ml-centrifugal high filter tube, centrifuge at 1000rpm for 1 min, and discharged the flow-through.
5. Add 500μl of Solution W1 to the tube and centrifuge at 1000rpm for 1min, discard the flow-through
6. Add 500μl of Solution W2 to the tube and centrifuge at 1000rpm for 1min, discard the flow-through
7. Repeat step 6
8. Reattach the centrifugal high filter tube back into the collection tube, and centrifuge at 12000rpm for 3 min. Discard the flow-through and the collection tube.
9. Transfer the centrifugal tube into a new 1.5ml-Eppendorf spin tube and allow the tube to sit for 1-2min with the cap opened. Add 80μl of TE Elution Buffer, allow the tube to sit for 5 min, and centrifuge at 12000rpm for 2min to elute the DNA.
To make sure the DNA extraction was pure, we performed electrophoresis. We used agarose gel electrophoresis with HE-PLUS by Hoefer and GelDoc XR by BIO-RAD to interpret it.
The principle of Hearing Loss Susceptibility GenoArray Diagnostic Kit was using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to amplify extracted DNA from PB (Peripheral Blood). PCR is a laboratory technique used to make many copies of a particular region of DNA (until millions or billions). The goal of PCR is to make enough of the target DNA region so that it can be analyzed.
PCR amplification area must be separated from PCR reagent preparation workstation. The reagent has 3 labeled (PCR mix, DNA Taq, and control negative (-)). PCR mix devided into 2 types (PCR mix A and B) with the same composition; Tris-HCl buffer, MgCl2, (<3% dATP, dCTP, dGTP, dTTP), (<3% synthetic oligonucleotide primers) and the same volume (825μl). The DNA Taq contained 30μl of DNA polymerase (5U/μl) and stabilizer. The negative control contained 100μl of DNAse-free distilled water.
Prepare each PCR Amplification Reagent tube according to the following pipetting scheme (total volume/reaction: 28 μl). Take a blood sample from the -20°C storage, and the DNA was extracted using PCR standard procedure, then take 2μl of the extracted DNA sample and placed as group1 and group 2. DNA was extracted using standard PCR procedures. Amplification of the DNA segment and denaturation was made with Bio-Rad CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System, USA. We used 4°C/sec ramp rate for the thermocycler and re-examined the DNA amplification with agarose gel electrophoresis.
The hybridization kit used in the study was Hearing Loss Susceptibility GenoArray Diagnostic Kit (ref HB_HLS GA) by Hybribio limited, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong) to analyze genetic mutation. Thirteen mutations in four genes (GJB2, GJB3, SLC26A4 and 12S rRNA) are evaluated simultaneously. By using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to amplify extracted DNA from PB (Peripheral Blood), amplified DNA amplicons are then hybridized with specific probes located inside the “HybriMem box” under hybribio patented “flow-through hybridization” technology followed by colorimetric result obtained using enzyme immunoassay method without using primer as in DNA sequencing (Figure 1).
(A) HybriMem Box. The wells detect specific gene mutation. (B) DNA HybriMax HHM-3 device, containing 15 HybriMem Box.
The hybridization reagents consist of hybridization solution, blocking solution, enzyme conjugate, solution A, washing solution, NBT/BCIP, hybridmem box. The composition of hybridization solution were 120ml 2X SSC and 0.1% SDS. The composition of blocking solution was 30ml TBS with <0.1% detergent. The composition of enzyme conjugate were 15ml <0.0003% Streptavidin-Alkaline, Phosphatase Conjugate, and Stabilizer. The composition of solution A was 100ml Tris-HCl buffer with 0.05% sodium azide. The composition of washing solution were 96ml 0.5X SSC and <0.1% SDS Solution. The composition of NBT/BCIP was 15ml 1-5% (w/w) NBT/BCIP. The composition of hybrimem box was 30 Nylon Membrane coated with specific DNA probes.
There were 3 steps in hybridization process. First step was running at 45°C from (number 1-11), second step (number 12-20) at 25°C, and third step (number 21-28) at 36°C. The steps were:
1. Set HybriMax temperature at 45°C. (Step 1-11 running at 45°C)
2. When the temperature of HybriMax reaches 45°C, add 0.8ml of 45°C pre-warmed Hybridization Solution into the sample well where “HybriMem” is located for 2 min.
3. Pump away all the solvent, then pump off.
4. Add 0.8ml of 45°C pre-warmed Hybridization Solution into the same wells.
5. Add group 1 and group 2 denatured DNA amplified samples from PCR tubes into one well, pipetting 2-3 times to mix the solution carefully.
6. Close the lid.
7. Incubate for 20 min. (Hybridization)
8. Pump away all the solvent, then pump off.
9. Add 0.8ml of 45°C washing Solution. (Washing Step)
10. Repeat Steps 8-9 four times more.
11. Pump off.
12. Set HybriMax temperature at 25°C.
13. When the temperature of HybriMax reaches around 30°C, add 0.5ml of Blocking Solution into the well. (Temperature is going down from 45°C to 25°C)
14. Pump away all the solvent, then pump it off.
15. Again, add 0.5ml of Blocking Solution and Incubate for 5 min; pump away all the solvent, then pump off.
16. When the temperature of HybriMax reaches 25°C, add 0.5ml of Enzyme Conjugate and Incubate for 5 min.
17. Pump away all the solvent then pump off.
18. Add 0.8ml of Solution A. (Washing Step)
19. Repeat Step 17-18 four times more.
20. Pump off.
21. Set HybriMax temperature at 36°C.
22. When the temperature of HybriMax reaches 36°C, add 0.5ml of NBT/BCIP Solution (brown bottle) and Incubate for 5 min. Close the lid. (Coloring)
23. Pump away all the solvent.
24. Keep the pump on.
25. Add 0.8ml of Hybridization Solution. (Washing Step)
26. Repeat Step 25 three times more.
27. Add 1.0ml of Distilled Water. (Rinsing Step)
28. Pump off
29. Remove the fixing cover and all accessories. Using forceps to take out the membranes and dry them on absorbent paper.
30. Interpret the results by color visualization observed on membrane.
Statistical analysis was carried out using descriptive techniques in Microsoft Excel and then interpreted in tabular form, using the SPSS Statistics 23 software.
Ethical clearance was obtained from the Health Research Ethical Committee of Medical Faculty Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia (approval number 9/EC/KEPK/FKUA/2021) in accordance with 7 (seven) WHO 2011 standards in October 2020. Written informed consent was obtained from both all subjects included in this study, as well as parents and teachers, after a thorough explanation of the examinations that would take in the study.
The characteristics of 49 subjects were as follows: the percentage of male and female participants was 51% and 49%. There were no subject with age10 years, nor >30 years, the highest number of subjects was in age range 11-20 years (91.84%), with the highest education level was senior high school 28 subjects (57.14%) (Table 1).18
The results of the audiogram examination, showed the type of deafness was sensorineural in all subjects, with the highest number was profound hearing loss (>90dB) in 46 subjects (93.88%), and the least number was severe hearing loss (71-90dB) in right ears 3 subjects, and left ears 3 subjects (6.12%) (Table 2)
Number of Subjects (n=49) | Percentage | |
---|---|---|
Audiogram Sensorineural | ||
Right | 49 | 100% |
Left | 49 | 100% |
Degree of Hearing Loss | ||
Mild | 0 | 0 |
Moderate | 0 | 0 |
Moderately to severe | 0 | 0 |
Severe | 3 | 6.12% |
Profound | 46 | 93.88% |
The results of the hybridization examination in Table 3 showed that genetic mutations occurred in 6 subjects (12.25%) with criteria for genetic mutations of the GJB2 gene 1 subject (2.04%), PDS gene 1 subject (2.04%), mtDNA gene 1 subject (2.04%), and in 3 subjects (6.13%) unknown (genetic mutation was found, but the type was unknown).19 The pattern of inheritance of the genetic mutation occurred in autosomal recessive 1 subject (2.04%), sex-linked 1 subject (2.04%), and mitochondrial 1 subject (2.04%).
GJB2 family
The genetic mutation of the GJB2 gene was indicated by the results of the hybridization of subject 49 (Figure 1). It could be seen that in column 299M of the hybridization panel appeared a dot, so the form was read as genetic mutation of GJB2-299M. The pedigree pattern in the first family generation from the medical record was unknown, as they could not be reached, the second generation (patient's parents) showed a mutation in the father, but no phenotype appeared (unimpaired hearing). While the mother was non-mutated, there was no mutation. The same mutation was inherited in both boys, but only the first child showed a non-syndromic congenital deafness phenotype, and the second child had normal hearing.
mtDNA family
In patients with hybridization results, the mtDNA genetic mutation was shown through subject 55, characterized by the disappearance of a dot in the 1555N column and the appearance of a dot in 1555M (Figure 1). The pedigree pattern of samples with mtDNA genetic mutations revealed that the first generation was known to have deafness in number 1 and unimpaired hearing in numbers 2, 3, and 4. The second generation of fathers had deaf sons and non-deaf daughters. In the second generation of mothers, there was no deafness. The third generation had offspring from the father and mother with a deaf phenotype. Both male and female children had the same phenotype and the same genetic mutation as the mother, while there was no mutation from the father’s side.
SLC26A4 family
Patients with the SLC26A4 genetic mutation were shown by hybridization results in the presence of dots in the IVS-M and IVS-N columns in samples 51 and 52 (Figure 1). In the pedigree pattern, mutations were found in the first and second generations, namely in the patient's grandmother and mother, but did not show a deafness phenotype (unimpaired hearing). Depicted in this pedigree pattern, in a non-deaf grandmother was detected more than one genetic mutation, passed on to a non-deaf daughter (patient's mother) who had a similar mutation, but when passed down to the males of third generation, the deafness phenotype appeared with heterogeneous IVS-M and IVS-N mutations.
Non-syndromic congenital deafness has 70% of the features that often appears in congenital hearing loss. The most common forms of inheritance in NSHL are autosomal recessive 77%, followed by autosomal dominant 22%, X-linked 1%, and mitochondrial <1%. 8 Genetic mutations that cause NSHL vary between different populations and ethnicities. The most common mutation is GJB 2 which is encoded by the protein connexin 26. The population in Saudi Arabia has higher OTOF gene mutations than the GJB2 gene. Mutations of GJB2, GJB3, SLC26A4, and mitochondrial 12SRNA were common causes of NSHL found in China.7,10
A similar study in Surabaya, Indonesia, showed that there were more females than males with hearing loss, different in Iraq where there were more males than females. Gender has no significant relationship with the occurrence of deafness.11
The results of the audiogram examination, showed that the type of deafness was sensorineural in all subjects, with the highest number was profound hearing loss (>90dB) in 46 subjects (93.88%). In a research profile of 430 patients with congenital deafness in America, the highest degree of the hearing was very severe (>90dB) in 133 samples, with no lateralization (symmetrical) in 311 samples (Raymond, 2019).12 Hearing loss may manifest in the ears as bilateral or unilateral and symmetrical or asymmetrical. Genetic deafness was mostly found as bilateral (44%), asymmetrical (22%) and unilateral (2%). There was a negative correlation between age and deafness after environmental factors were excluded in 1119 patients; congenital onset occurred in 45%, childhood 30%, and adulthood 28%. A study of 200 samples in the Netherlands stated that deafness could be found 50% as congenital, 38% in the first decade, and 20% in the second decade of life.2
The results of the hybridization examination in Table 1 showed that genetic mutations occurred in 6 subjects (12.25%), with criteria for genetic mutations of the GJB2 gene 1 subject (2.04%), PDS gene 1 subject (2.04%), mtDNA gene 1 subject (2.04%), and 3 subjects (6.13%), unknown (genetic mutation was found but the type was not known). Research in Bosnia and Herzegovina described that in the results of exome sequencing of patients with non-syndromic deafness, 68% showed negative results, 18% positive mutations, while in syndromic deafness it was more genetic mutations were found.13 Following this study, genetic examinations for non-syndromic deafness did not always reveal mutations. In this study, due to limitations in the examination, only a few genes could be detected.
The pattern of inheritance of genetic mutations in this study occurred in autosomal recessive one subject (2.04%), sex-linked one subject (2.04%), and mitochondrial one subject (2.04%). Non-syndromic hearing loss (NSHL) was inherited in an autosomal recessive manner (75-80%), autosomal dominant (20-25%), and 1-2% X-chromosome and mitochondria-linked. After aging, the prevalence of autosomal dominant inheritance and mitochondrial inheritance increases while autosomal recessive inheritance decreases.7,14 Autosomal dominant is described as a child whose mother has a no mutations gene and a father who mutates the dominant gene, can inherit a 50% chance of being deaf. Only one copy of the inherited mutation gene can cause deafness in a child. So in every pregnancy, there is a 50% chance that the child will be deaf. Autosomal recessive is when the chromosomes of the father and mother have a recessive mutation in the same gene and are inherited in 50% of their offspring, but it takes two mutated genes to produce a deafness phenotype. In X-linked inheritance, boys have a higher chance of deafness. Mitochondrial inheritance is only inherited by eggs from the mother, and all offspring will be deaf.15
The results of hybridization of research and family samples obtained one sample of IVS-M/IVS-N mutation; one sample of 299M/299N mutation; one sample of the 1555M mutation; one sample of mutations 235M/235N, 7445M/7445N, and IVS-M/IVS-N; one sample of mutations 235M/235N, 7445M/7445N, 538M/538N, and IVS-M/IVS-N. The interpretation of the results of this hybridization was, if an IVS-M/IVS-N mutation was found, it was defined as a SLC26A4-IVS(7)2 mutation; mutation 299M/299N defined as GJB2-299; the 1555M mutation was defined as mtDNA1555; mutation 235M/235N defined as heterozygous GJB2-235 mutation; mutations 7445M/7445N defined as mtDNA7445 mutations, mutations 538M/538N defined as mutations GJB3-538. The family of patients with mtDNA 1555 (1555M homozygous) had a deaf father and mother, but only the mother had the 1555M mitochondrial mutation. The result of inheritance in their offspring was deafness in all children. This was related to the reference where mitochondrial inheritance can only be inherited by egg cells from the mother, which caused all of the offspring to be deaf.15,16
The hybridization kit used by researchers had limitations in assessing the genetic mutations that occured. The Hearing Loss Susceptibility GenoArray Diagnostic Kit is designed for rapid screening with accurate results through dot mutations known to be associated with hereditary hearing loss. Thirteen mutations in four genes (GJB2, GJB3, SLC26A4 and 12S rRNA) were evaluated simultaneously. In this study, Knowledge of mutations could help identify hearing loss at birth and could advise avoiding taking certain types of antibiotics that are associated with deafness in children who carry the gene mutation.17 Researchers took hybribio as a genetic mutation screening method because the GJB2, GJB3, mitochondrial and SLC26A4 genes are genetic mutations that often appear in Asian populations.17
In the pedigree pattern, the SLC26A4 family (IVS-M/IVS-N) had its own pattern, where the grandmother had 4 genetic mutations (235M/235N, 7445M/7445N, 538M/538N, IVS-M/IVS-N), the mother had 3 genetic mutations (235M/235N, 7445M/7445N, IVS-M/IVS-N), and the child had only 1 genetic mutation. This was interesting because the inherited mutation was only 1 gene while the other genes were missing (235M/235N, 7445M/7445N, 538M/538N). The most common genes in cases of autosomal recessive hearing loss in order of highest frequency are the GJB2, SLC26A4, and MYO15A genes.7
In the GJB2 family pattern (299M/299N heterozygous) a father who carried the genetic mutation but was not deaf with a mother not found the mutation gene, had deaf and normal sons. This pattern was an autosomal recessive genetic mutation. Under the reference that in cases of non-syndromic hearing loss, the most common mutation occurred in GJB2.7
Non-syndromic congenital deafness in Surabaya was caused by genetic mutations GJB2, SLC26A4 and mtDNA 1555, which were passed down through families with diverse inheritance patterns. Genetic mutation is one of the causes of non-syndromic congenital deafness. Hybridization examination is a limited screening method to determine promptly the presence of genetic mutations that caused deafness in GJB2, GJB3, mtDNA, and SLC26A4 mutations that often occur in Asia. Genetic counselling is needed to predict the risk of deafness that will be passed down, prepare genetic screening methods, and be able to determine the prognosis of the therapy that will be carried out. Further examination with next generation sequencing method on all samples is needed to find more genetic mutations that cause non-syndromic deafness.
Figshare: Genetic Mapping and Pedigree Analysis of Non-syndromic Congenital Deafness in Surabaya, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21739010.v1. 18
Fighsare: Result of PCR and hybridization. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21749282.v1. 19
Figshare: Inform Concent of genetic patient. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21679319. 20
This project contains the following extended data:
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).
The authors would like to express their gratitude to Karya Mulia Deaf School Surabaya and Prodia Clinical Laboratory and to Simlitabmas LPPM Universitas Airlangga. The authors are also very grateful to the Department of Otorhinolaryngology Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Otolaryngology
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Human Genetics
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Otology, middle ear pathology, hearing reconstruction, bone anchored and middle ear implants , cholesteatoma
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |
Version 1 05 Jan 23 |
read | read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)