ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Genome Note

The complete genome sequences of Penicillium concavorugulosum

[version 1; peer review: 1 not approved]
PUBLISHED 23 Mar 2023
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Genomics and Genetics gateway.

Abstract

The fungal genus Penicillium and many other soil-borne fungi have widely been reported to create soil myco-rhizhospheric conditions that influence plant growth. These fungal species are relatively difficult to differentiate to species level. Of the three Penicillium species that were morphologically identified, one isolate was established to have a bio-suppressive effect on Fusarium oxysporum. Molecular identification using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique was carried out to accurately identify this isolate to species level. The BLAST consensus and alignments of related species was carried out. The species was identified as Penicillium concavorugulosum (NCBI accession number MK841454.1).

Keywords

Genome, assembly, Penicillium concavorugulosum, Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

Introduction

Penicillium species are a widespread group of facultative fungi which are found in various habitats such as soil, air and decaying plant matter (Pitt and Hocking, 2009; Visagie et al., 2005). Various studies have reported the genus to contain several species which play different roles in agriculture and human health. For example, species such as Penicillium cyclopium and Penicillium citrinum have been reported to be contaminants in corn, soybean, and dried beans (Munkvold et al., 2019). Whereas Penicillium expansum and many other Penicillium species have been reported to cause post-harvest losses in pome fruits and apples (Pitt and Hocking, 2009; Wu et al., 2019).

Many Penicillium species produce extracellular enzymes such as cellulolytic enzymes, polysaccharases and pectic enzymes that aid in the breakdown of organic materials and use in antibiotic production, cell degeneration, as well as food production (Yoon et al., 2007; Rabha and Jha, 2018). Production of these enzymes and phytohormones by Penicillium fungal species that influence plant physiological processes was also reported by (Chanclud and Morel, 2016). Tiwari et al. (2011) also highlighted Penicillium species as some of many fungal microorganisms that possess multifunctional properties that enable them to be used in various agro-industries, biological, medicinal, and commercial purposes.

This potential widespread use of different fungal species, including Penicillium species, require accurate identification. The need for accurate identification of various important micro-organisms has led to the development and utilization of molecular identification techniques. This technology uses polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Fungal microorganisms are mostly analyzed using the PCR method to determine the ITS region for accurate differentiation of species amongst the genus (Johnston, 2011).

One of the three Penicillium fungal species was established to possess multifunctional properties such as antibiosis, competition and myco-parasitism, and therefore was considered valuable for use as a bio-control agent against soil fungal pathogens (Segone, 2021). Furthermore, complete genome sequences for this Penicillium fungal species would also contribute to taxonomic studies, and evolution processes as well as understanding its various inherent antagonistic properties.

Methods

Four Penicillium species were isolated by use of soil serial dilution procedure. Soil was collected from different sites at the North-West University Mafikeng agricultural farm (25.8278° S, 25.6079° E). These sites had previously been subjected to different agronomic practices such as minimum soil tillage, weed control, fertilizer management and controlled irrigation.

DNA was extracted from the isolate mycelium by use of the Quick-DNA fungal/bacterial Miniprep Kit (Zymo Research, Catalogue No. D6005) (White et al., 1990).

Amplification of the target genes was carried out by use of OneTaq Quick load 2×Master Mix (NEB, Catalogue No. M0486) with primers presented in Table 1. Each Eppendorf tube comprised 10μL of NEB OneTaq 2X MasterMix with Standard Buffer (Catalogue No. M0482S), 1μL of genomic DNA (10-30ng/μL), 1μL forward primer (10μM), 1μL reverse primer (10μM), and 7μL nuclease-free water (Catalogue No. E476). Amplification cycles had an initial denaturation at 94°C for 10 minutes, 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 seconds, annealing at 50°C, elongation at 68°C for 1 minute and final elongation at 72°C for 10 minutes. The PCR amplicons were stored at 4°C until electrophoresis.

Table 1. Internal transcribed spacer primer sequences that were used for amplification of the ITS regions.

Name of primerTargetSequence (5’ to 3’)Cycling conditions
ITS 1Small Sub-unitTCCGTAGGTGAACCTTGCGG94°Cfor30sec50°Cforsec35cycles
ITS 4Large Sub-unitTCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC68°Cfor1min68°Cfor10min35cycles

Agarose gel analysis

The integrity of the PCR amplicons was established by using a 1% agarose gel (CSL-AG500, Cleaver Scientific Ltd) in which EZ-vision Bluelight DNA Dye was used as a stainer. The extracted fragments were sequenced in the forward and reverse direction (Nimagen, BrilliantDyeTM Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit v3.1, BRD3-100/1000). These were purified by use of Zymo Research, ZR-96 DNA Sequencing clean-up KitTM, (Catalogue No. D4050). The purified fragments were analysed on the ABI 3500xl Genetic analyser (Applied Biosystems, ThermoFisher Scientific). This was done for each reaction and every sample. CLC Bio Main Workbench v7.6 was used to analyse the ab1 files generated by the ABI 3500xl Genetic analyser and the results were obtained by conducting a BLAST search (NCBI) (Stephen et al., 1997).

Results

The genome assembly for the test Penicillium fungal species yielded a total sequence length of 570 with an N50 value of 796.6 bits (882), Expect = 0E00, Identities = 441/441 (100%), Gaps = 0/441 (0%).

This Penicillium fungal isolate was identified as Penicillium concavorugulosum (Accession: MK 841454.1).

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 23 Mar 2023
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Ramachela K and Segone G. The complete genome sequences of Penicillium concavorugulosum [version 1; peer review: 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2023, 12:321 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.131637.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 23 Mar 2023
Views
11
Cite
Reviewer Report 26 Apr 2023
Anthony A. Adegoke, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, University of Uyo, Uyo, Akwa Ibom, Nigeria 
Not Approved
VIEWS 11
The manuscript was poorly presented. All that could be deducted from the manuscript was that amplicon-based sequencing was done. It was not clearly presented. It looked like Sanger sequencing which of course contradicts the title of the manuscript (complete sequencing). ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Adegoke AA. Reviewer Report For: The complete genome sequences of Penicillium concavorugulosum [version 1; peer review: 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2023, 12:321 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.144498.r167524)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 23 Mar 2023
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.