ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article
Revised

The association between vitamin D deficiency and the clinical outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients

[version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 2 not approved]
PUBLISHED 05 Feb 2024
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Emerging Diseases and Outbreaks gateway.

Abstract

Background

Vitamin D deficiency is an emerging public health problem that affects more than one billion people worldwide. Vitamin D has been shown to be effective in preventing and reducing the severity of viral respiratory diseases, including influenza. However, the role of vitamin D in COVID-19 infection remains controversial. This study aimed to analyze the association of vitamin D deficiency on the clinical outcome of hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Methods

A prospective cohort study was conducted among hospitalized COVID-19 patients at two COVID-19 referral hospitals in Indonesia from October 2021 until February 2022.

Results

The median serum 25(OH)D level in 191 hospitalized COVID-19 patients was 13.6 [IQR=10.98] ng/mL. The serum 25(OH)D levels were significantly lower among COVID-19 patients with vitamin D deficiency who had cardiovascular disease (p-value=0.04), the use of a ventilator (p-value=0.004), more severe COVID-19 cases (p-value=0.047), and mortality (p-value=0.002). Furthermore, serum 25(OH)D levels were significantly different between patients with mild and severe COVID-19 cases (p-value=0.019). Serum 25(OH)D levels in moderate and severe COVID-19 cases were significantly different (p-value=0.031). Lower serum 25(OH)D levels were significantly associated with an increased number of comorbidities (p-value=0.03), the severity of COVID-19 (p-value=0.002), and the use of mechanical ventilation (p-value=0.032). Mortality was found in 7.3% of patients with deficient vitamin D levels. However, patients with either sufficient or insufficient vitamin D levels did not develop mortality.

Conclusions

COVID-19 patients with vitamin D deficiency were significantly associated with having cardiovascular disease, mortality, more severe COVID-19 cases, and the used of mechanical ventilation. Lower serum 25(OH)D levels were associated with an increased number of comorbidities, COVID-19 severity, and the use of mechanical-ventilation. Thus, we suggest hospitalized COVID-19 patients to reach a sufficient vitamin D status to improve the clinical outcome of the disease.

Keywords

Vitamin D, 25(OH)D, clinical outcome, COVID-19

Revised Amendments from Version 3

The reviewer did raise a very important concern which will improve our manuscript. 
-The title was updated.
-We have included additional information in the discussion section.
-We have included several factors that are considered to be limitations of our study.
-We added more references to enhance the quality of our paper.

See the authors' detailed response to the review by Parvaiz Koul
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Luigi di Filippo
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Guo-Xun Chen
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Shaun Sabico

Introduction

Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) is a rapidly spreading pandemic disease caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona-Virus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the seventh coronavirus that infect humans. This highly contagious virus spreads through phonation and breathing droplets or through direct contact with an infected person.13 The disease can exhibit a wide range of symptoms, from asymptomatic to dramatic, such as hypoxia and multiorgan failure.15 There is a lack of evidence-based data about the risk factors for the infection, as well as the most effective treatments. Current hospital-based management is focused on the excessive inflammatory response and respiratory support due to the fact that targeted antiviral therapies have not been widely accessible.6

Vitamin D is a versatile steroid hormone that plays multiple roles in the body, including the regulation of bone and calcium metabolism.7,8 It also supports the innate and adaptive immune systems against respiratory viruses.7,9 It controls the innate immune system by stimulating the synthesis of antimicrobial peptides such as IL-37, cathelicidins, and defensivins.1,10,11 Vitamin D also modulates adaptive immunity by regulating the formation of inflammatory T helper type 17 (Th17) cells toward the anti-inflammatory regulatory T cells and altering the primary pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interferon-γ, TNF-α and IL-6.1,7,1012 This regulation is considered to be less effective in cases of vitamin D deficiency, although it might be obtained if vitamin D had reached a sufficient level.1

Deficient vitamin D is a global health crisis, affecting over a billion people.7,1317 Vitamin D deficiency was widespread across Southeast Asian countries, despite extensive exposure to sunlight.18 Based on current evidence, vitamin D helps prevent and mitigate the severity of viral respiratory diseases, such as influenza.4,7,19,20 However, the role of vitamin D in COVID-19 infection remains unclear.4,7

Furthermore, this is the first study that analyzes the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infections Consortium Coronavirus Clinical Characterisation Consortium (ISARIC-4C) score in a group of patients with vitamin D deficiency. The ISARIC 4C mortality score provides an approach for evaluating the risk of mortality upon admission by utilizing demographic and physiological parameters. This scoring system is derived from a comprehensive population cohort study conducted at the national level in the United Kingdom.21 Understanding the clinical course of COVID-19 is crucial until a viable vaccination becomes widely accessible, due to the lack of specific therapies and the tremendous health and economic impact of the pandemic.1,22 In this situation, deficient vitamin D is a modifiable risk factor due to its safety and affordability.1,23,24 The aim of this study was to assess the association of vitamin D deficiency on the clinical outcome of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Thus, a comprehensive understanding can be obtained as a promising strategy for evaluating the prognosis and treatment for COVID-19 patients.

Methods

Study design

This study was a cross-sectional study conducted at two COVID-19 referral hospitals in Jakarta, Indonesia (National Emergency Hospital Wisma Atlet Kemayoran and Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital), from October 2021 until February 2022. The included subjects were COVID-19 positive (confirmed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR]) and admitted to the hospital; aged 18 years and older. The exclusion criteria were COVID-19 patients with clinically asymptomatic and severely affected COVID-19 patients who arrived using mechanical ventilation prior to admission. This study specifically involved subjects registered with mild, moderate, or severe disease according to WHO interim guidance and Indonesian government policy at admission.25 The STROBE guidelines (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) were followed for this study.

Data collection

The SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed through positive RT-PCR obtained from nasal and oropharyngeal swabs collected.26 The examination was carried out in the Biosafety Level 3-facility (BSL-3) with Biological Safety Cabinet Class II (BSC-II).

During the admission, each patient had 3–5 mL of blood collected in an acid citrate dextrose tube from a cuffed venous sample. The samples were transported to the laboratory in a cold chain for the measurement of vitamin D. Vitamin D status was evaluated by measuring serum 25(OH) D or 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels. The results were gathered using Roche Diagnostics’ Cobas e411, a competitive electrochemiluminescent protein binding assay.

According to Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline, a serum 25(OH) D level of less than 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L) was considered as deficient.27 In this study, we divided serum 25(OH) D level into three categories, subjects with serum 25(OH) D levels ≤ 20 ng/mL (≤50 nmol/L) were considered as deficient, serum 25(OH) D levels 21-29 ng/mL (51-74 nmol/L) were considered as insufficient, and serum 25(OH) D levels 30 ng/mL (75 nmol/L) were considered as sufficient.

ISARIC-4C Score

Characteristics examined in the ISARIC-4C mortality score were obtained from each included patient during their admission, as defined by Knight et al.21 The determinant factors include sex, age, respiratory rate (RR), peripheral oxygen saturation (%), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, urea serum (mmol/L), and C-reactive protein (mmol/L; CRP).6,31 The total scores were categorized into low risk (score 0–3), intermediate risk (score 4–8), high risk (score 9–14), and very high risk (score ≥ 15).21

Statistical analysis

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27 for Macintosh was used to analyze the data that was collected. The serum 25(OH) D levels between two subgroups were analyzed with either Mann-Whitney U test for 2 subgroups and Kruskal-Wallis test for more than 2 subgroups.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval for this study was granted by Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia (ethical approval number: KET533/UN2.F1/ETIK/PPM.00.01/2021) and by the Ethics Committee of Wisma Atlet Hospital Jakarta (029/KERSDCWA/2021). The Declaration of Helsinki was implemented during this study.

Results

This cross-sectional study included 191 subjects. Before being enrolled, each participant signed a written consent form. The characteristics of the included subjects can be observed in Table 1. From the 191 subjects, 54.5% were female.

Table 1. Subject characteristics.

VariablesN = 191
Age, median [IQR]42 [28]
Serum 25(OH) D level, median [IQR], in ng/mL13.6 [10.98]
Sex, N (%)
Female104 (54.5)
Male87 (45.5)
Body mass index (BMI), median [IQR]22.66 [4.13]
COVID-19 categories, n (%)
Mild93 (48.7)
Moderate67 (35.1)
Severe – critical31 (16.2)
Number of comorbid, N (%)
None72 (37.7)
140 (20.9)
279 (41.4)
Type of comorbidities
Type 2 DM, N (%)63 (32.9)
Hypertension, N (%)60 (31.5)
Cardiovascular disease, N (%)17 (8.9)
Chronic liver disease, N (%)6 (3.2)
Chronic kidney failure, N (%)19 (9.9)
Cerebrovascular disease, N (%)12 (6.3)
Malignancy, N (%)19 (9.9)
HIV, N (%)1 (0.6)
Autoimmune diseases, N (%)10 (5.2)
COPD, N (%)2 (1.1)
Vaccination status, n (%)
Unvaccinated60 (31.5)
One dose2 (1)
Two doses128 (67.1)
Three doses1 (0.5)
Simple oxygenation, n (%)61 (31.9)
ISARIC-4C Score, N (%)
Low risk109 (57)
Intermediate risk39 (20.4)
High risk31 (16.2)
Very high risk12 (6.3)

Subjects who had a history of diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, stroke or transient ischaemic index, cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic liver disease, and chronic kidney disease were considered to have comorbidities according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI).28

Table 2 provided the significance levels of serum 25(OH) D level across all included subgroups using the chi-square (χ2) analysis. Vitamin D deficiency was found in 74.4% of COVID-19 patients, including 65.4% of patients under the age of 60 and 11% of patients over the age of 60. Lower serum 25(OH) D levels were associated with an increased number of comorbidities, the severity of COVID-19, and the use of mechanical ventilation. Among 191 patients, mortality was found in 7.3% of patients with deficient vitamin D levels. However, subjects with either sufficient or insufficient vitamin D levels did not develop mortality.

Table 2. The categorized levels of serum 25(OH) D levels based on the influencing factors.

VariablesCategoriesSerum 25(OH) D Levelp-value
TotalDeficient (20 ng/mL)Insufficient (21-29 ng/mL)Sufficient (≥30 ng/mL)
Age0.928
≤60 years old164 (85.9%)125 (65.4%)30 (15.7%)9 (4.7%)
>60 years old27 (14.1%)21 (11.0%)5 (2.6%)1 (0.5%)
ISARIC-4C score0.135
Low risk109 (57.07%)77 (40.3%)23 (12%)9 (4.7%)
Intermediate risk39 (20.42%)30 (15.7%)8 (4.2%)1 (0.5%)
High risk31 (16.23%)27 (14.1%)4 (2.1%)0 (0.0%)
Very high risk12 (6.28%)12 (6.3%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
Number of comorbidities0.03
072 (37.70%)42 (24.1%)17 (8.9%)9 (4.7%)
140 (20.90%)33 (17.3%)6 (3.1%)1 (0.5%)
279 (41.40%)67 (35.1%)12 (6.3%)0 (0.0%)
Type of comorbidities
DM type IINo128 (67.0%)93 (48.7%)25 (13.1%)10 (5.2%)0.051
Yes63 (33.0%)53 (27.7%)10 (5.2%)0 (0.0%)
HypertensionNo131 (68.6%)96 (50.3%)25 (13.1%)10 (5.2%)0.072
Yes60 (31.4%)50 (26.2%)10 (5.2%)0 (0.0%)
Cardiovascular diseaseNo174 (91.1%)133 (69.6%)31 (16.2%)10 (5.2%)0.534
Yes17 (8.9%)13 (6.8%)4 (2.1%)0 (0.0%)
Chronic liver diseaseNo185 (96.9%)140 (73.3%)35 (18.3%)10 (5.2%)0.385
Yes6 (3.1%)6 (3.1%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
Chronic kidney diseaseNo172 (90.1%)128 (67.0%)34 (17.8%)10 (5.2%)0.136
Yes19 (9.9%)18 (9.4%)1 (0.5%)0 (0.0%)
MalignancyNo172 (90.1%)128 (67.0%)34 (17.8%)10 (5.2%)0.136
Yes19 (9.9%)18 (9.4%)1 (0.5%)0 (0.0%)
COPDNo189 (99.0%)145 (75.9%)34 (17.8%)10 (5.2%)0.497
Yes2 (1.0%)1 (0.5%)1 (0.5%)0 (0.0 %)
HIVNo190 (99.5%)145 (75.9%)35 (18.3%)10 (5.2%)0.856
Yes1 (0.5%)1 (0.5%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
Autoimmune diseasesNo181 (94.8%)139 (72.8%)32 (16.8%)10 (5.2%)0.498
Yes10 (5.2%)7 (3.7%)3 (1.6%)0 (0.0%)
BMI0.435
Underweight103 (53.93%)84 (44%)13 (6.8%)6 (3.1%)
Normoweight8 (4.19%)6 (3.1%)2 (1.0%)0 (0.0%)
Overweight34 (17.80%)25 (13.1%)8 (4.1%)1 (0.5%)
Obesity grade I46 (24.08%)31 (16.2%)12 (6.3%)3 (1.6%)
Mortality0.097
No177 (92.7%)132 (69.1%)35 (18.3%)10 (5.2%)
Yes14 (7.3%)14 (7.3%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
COVID-19 severity0.002
Mild93 (48.69%)62 (32.5%)21 (11.0%)10 (5.2%)
Moderate67 (35.07%)55 (28.8%)12 (6.3%)0 (0%)
Severe31 (16.24%)29 (15.2%)2 (1.0%)0 (0%)
Vaccine doses0.339
060 (31.4%)52 (27.7%)7 (3.7%)1 (0.5%)
12 (1.0%)2 (1.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
2128 (67.0%)91 (47.6%)28 (14.7%)9 (4.7%)
31 (0.5%)1 (0.5%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
HFNC or ventilator use0.032
No171 (89.53%)126 (66%)35 (18.3%)10 (5.2%)
Yes20 (10.50%)20 (10.5%)0 (0.0%)0 (0%)
Total191 (100%)146 (76.4%)35 (18.4%)10 (5.2)

Table 3 showed that serum 25(OH) D levels were significantly lower among COVID-19 patients with vitamin D deficiency who had cardiovascular disease, the use of a ventilator, more severe COVID-19 cases, and mortality. Mortality was found in 9.59% of COVID-19 patients with vitamin D deficiency.

Table 3. The effect of vitamin D deficiency among each subgroup.

VariablesCategoriesN (%)Serum 25(OH) D Level
Mean ± SD or median [IQR], in ng/mLp-value
Age groups≤60 years old125 (85.62%)11.94 [7.69]0.186a
>60 years old21 (14.38%)9.74 ± 5.15
ISARIC-4C scoreLow risk77 (52.74%)12.07 ± 4.550.067b
Intermediate risk30 (20.55%)10.75 ± 4.73
High risk27 (18.49%)9.22 ± 5.09
Very high risk12 (8.22%)10.97 ± 6.15
Number of comorbidities046 (31.51%)12.30 [8.06]0.133c
133 (22.60%)10.90 ± 4.60
267 (45.89%)10.52 ± 5.12
Type of comorbidities
DM type IINo93 (63.7%)11.05 ± 4.790.675d
Yes53 (36.30%)11.41 ± 5.12
HypertensionNo96 (65.75%)11.21 ± 4.840.914d
Yes50 (34.25%)11.12 ± 5.05
Cardiovascular diseaseNo133 (91.1%)11.44 ± 4.850.040d
Yes13 (8.90%)8.52 ± 4.72
Chronic kidney diseaseNo128 (87.7%)11.49 ± 4.720.051a
Yes18 (12.3%)7.75 [9.56]
MalignancyNo128 (87.67%)11.37 ± 4.930.211d
Yes18 (12.33%)9.83 ± 4.56
BMIUnderweight84 (57.53%)11.73 [8.09]0.082c
Normoweight6 (4.11%)7.97 ± 3.54
Overweight25 (17.12%)12.47 ± 4.90
Obesity grade I31 (21.23%)9.93 ± 4.94
Mortality rateNo132 (90.41%)11.58 ± 4.800.002d
Yes14 (9.59%)7.44 ± 4.26
COVID-19 severityMild62 (42.47%)11.78 ± 4.620.047c
Moderate55 (37.67%)12.04 [6.64]
Severe29 (19.86%)7.37 [8.84]
HFNC or ventilator useNo126 (86.30%)11.66 ± 4.700.004a
Yes20 (13.70%)6.39 [7.99]

a Analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test.

b Analyzed using ANOVA test.

c Analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test.

d Analyzed using t-test.

Figure 1 presented the bivariate analysis performed on COVID-19 patients who were vitamin D deficiency. Serum 25(OH) D levels were significantly different between patients with mild and severe COVID-19 cases (p-value < 0.001). Serum 25(OH) D levels in mild and moderate COVID-19 cases were also significantly different (p-value 0.002).

b2d89749-f2ce-474f-8719-9a9dd32f6e6c_figure1.gif

Figure 1. The bivariate analysis of serum 25(OH) D levels based on COVID-19 severity among deficient vitamin D subjects after adjusted with Bonferroni correction.

Analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test. Significant at p-value < 0.05. The green double-arrow denotes statistically significant difference. The red double-arrow denotes non-statistically significant difference.

Discussion

Prior studies indicates that Indonesia has a high prevalence of deficient vitamin D (60%), despite being located in a tropical zone where sunlight is abundant all year around.3032 Whereas the skin’s absorption of sunlight is established as the primary source of vitamin D, other variables, including age, comorbidities, and skin pigmentation, may alter the vitamin D level.15,32 Based on the skin’s sensitivity to ultraviolet (UV) light, the majority of Indonesians have either Fitzpatrick skin phototype IV (with medium to dark brown) or phototype V (dark brown). A lower vitamin D is associated with darker skin pigmentation due to the higher melanin present in darker skin.18,32,33 Other factors, including haze, altitude, and air pollution, also alter the ultraviolet B radiation.32,34

The beneficial effect of vitamin D to reduce the severity of respiratory tract infection remains controversial.4,7 Prior studies by Luigi et al. have shown that insufficient levels of vitamin D may have a detrimental effect on the prognosis of acute COVID-19, as well as on the development of Long-COVID and the long-term immune response to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.3537 The current study investigated the association of vitamin D deficiency to the clinical outcome of hospitalized patients at two COVID-19 referral hospitals in Indonesia. We found that compared to insufficient and sufficient, those with deficient vitamin D status had more number of comorbidities (Table 2). In COVID-19 patients with deficient vitamin D were significantly associated with cardiovascular disease (Table 3). Our findings was supported by de la Guía-Galipienso et al., that revealed vitamin D deficiency may play a critical role in the initiation of inflammation, myocardial calcification, and endothelial dysfunction, which are risk factors for cardiovascular disease.27,38 The vitamin D receptor (VDR) and the enzyme 1α-hydroxylase, which are necessary for the formation of vitamin D’s active form, are expressed in cardiomyocytes, vascular endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and smooth muscle cells.3942 Left ventricular hypertrophy, vascular dysfunction, and arterial stiffness have been associated with vitamin D deficiency. A deficiency of the vitamin D receptor causes an increase in left ventricular mass and elevated levels of atrial natriuretic peptide, as well as cardiac metalloproteases and disturbances in homeostasis. Furthermore, the development of fibrotic extracellular matrix induces left ventricular dilation.27,43,44

Vitamin D has been shown to have a number of beneficial effects on the cardiovascular system, including natriuretic peptide secretion, inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), anti-hypertrophic effects, and inhibition of cardiomyocyte proliferation.39,45,46 Calcitriol and its analogues activate VDR, which directly suppresses angiotensin I expression and local angiotensin II synthesis in myocardial, kidney tissue, and renal arteries.39,47 Studies have revealed that vitamin D enhances the anti-hypertensive effects of angiotensin 1–7 by inducing the production of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2).39,48,49 MiR-106b-5p, which acts on juxtaglomerular cells to boost renin synthesis, has been shown to be directly influenced by VDR-deficient immune cells.39,49

Moreover, vitamin D affects the progression of HF through modulating the production of metalloproteinases. Evidence strongly suggests that vitamin D has an anti-inflammatory effect by preventing nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) and promoting the production of IL-10, which have a significant role in the progression of CVD.39,50,51 Vitamin D deficiency induces arterial stiffness and endothelial dysfunction in blood vessels, which in turn leads to enhanced inflammation, endothelial cell malfunction, and atherogenesis.27,52

The severity of COVID-19 were significantly associated with the lower serum 25(OH) D levels (Tables 2, 3 and Figure 1). Vitamin D is an immunomodulatory hormone with antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties, and it plays a crucial role in the immune system. Vitamin D has been reported to exert its effects against COVID-19 by limiting the viral transmission, diminishing viral replication, and optimizing viral clearance.27,53 Vitamin D boosts the innate immune response and protects against excessive inflammation, by increasing anti-inflammatory IL-10 and decreasing pro-inflammatory cytokines and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α).29,5357 According to the research of Daneshkhah et al., a lack of vitamin D raises C-reaction protein (CRP) levels, which in turn elevates the risk of a cytokine storm.27,58 The protective effects of vitamin D on the coagulation pathway led to a reduced risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome and thrombosis.53,5961 Thus, increasing vitamin D levels to adequate levels may help to prevent COVID-19 infection and complications.27,53,54,59,62

Futhermore, Sabico et al. that conducted a multi-center randomized clinical trial in Middle East, a region with high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency, revealed that a daily oral supplementation of 5000 IU vitamin D3 for 2 weeks reduced the recovery time for gustatory sensory loss and cough among patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 symptoms and sub-optimal vitamin D status.63

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that analyse the ISARIC-4C score in a group of patients with vitamin D deficiency. We found that serum 25(OH) D levels had no significant association with ISARIC-4C Score (Tables 2, 3). In contrast with study by Wellbelove et al. that concluded the ISARIC-4C mortality score is good predictors for 30-day mortality in COVID-19 (AUROC of 0.74–0.88).64 The ISARIC-4C consortium established the ISARIC-4C Mortality Score to predict the mortality of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Multicentre cohort study was conducted among 74,944 participants at 260 different hospitals. However, the ISARIC-4C has been internally validated but not externally validated. Hence, further study is warranted to fully understand the potential of ISARIC-4C as a prognostic tool to classify patients into specific management groups.6,29,65

Serum 25(OH) D levels were significantly lower among subjects that used the ventilator (Tables 2, 3). Among all patients, mortality was found in 7.3% of patients with deficient vitamin D levels. However, patients with either sufficient or insufficient vitamin D levels did not develop mortality (Table 2). Serum 25(OH) D levels in vitamin D deficiency subjects were significantly lower in the COVID-19 patients with mortality status (Table 3). Our findings were consistent with the cohort study by Angelidi et al. and the single-center retrospective study by Alguwaihes et al., which discovered that lower 25(OH) D levels were associated with increased mechanical ventilation needs and mortality risk among hospitalized patients.66,67

Prior studies have revealed that vitamin D deficiency has been correlated to a 58% increased risk of acute respiratory infection, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and a 10-fold increase in mortality risk.66,68,69

In contrast, a single-center prospective study conducted in the Indian subcontinent, a region with a high prevalence of deficient vitamin D, demonstrated no statistically significant difference in the median length of stay (LOS) between patients with sufficient vitamin D and deficient vitamin D (p-value = 0.176). The LOS for patients with deficient vitamin D was 12 days (95% CI: 10, 12 days), and the LOS for patients with sufficient vitamin D was 11 days (95% CI: 10, 13 days). They also showed that deficient vitamin D (defined as 25(OH) D < 30 ng/mL) in patients with COVID-19 was not associated with the length of hospital stay, the need for mechanical ventilation, or the mortality rate.70 These different results could be explained by different cut-offs to define deficient vitamin D. In our study, a serum 25(OH) D level of less than 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L) was considered deficient according to the Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guidelines.27 On the other hand, most hospitalized patients with COVID-19 have numerous comorbidities, and this population tends to have lower vitamin D levels. Another cohort study by Luigi et al., which excluded the effect of reverse causality and the concomitant comorbidities, demonstrated that vitamin D levels upon admission to the hospital can be used to prospectively predict worse outcomes for both severe and non-severe COVID-19.71 Thus, vitamin D levels in such a setting should be interpreted with caution.70

As a steroid hormone, vitamin D interacts with the vitamin D receptor located in the nucleus of cells to have physiologic effects.17,66 The interaction of 25(OH) D with other steroid hormone receptors may have physiological effects similar to glucocorticoids.66,72 Although the underlying mechanisms of vitamin D’s protection against severe COVID-19 are unknown, it is established that vitamin D reduces the production of proinflammatory cytokines such as Th1, TNF-α, interferon-β, IL-6, and promotes the production of anti-inflammatory responses such as T regulatory cells and Th2.55,66,7375 There are several explanations for vitamin D’s beneficial effects on critically ill patients. Initially, critically ill patients who are given vitamin D supplements will have their plasma vitamin D concentrations restored. Furthermore, vitamin D regulates the synthesis of immune system effector molecules such as β-defensin and cathelicidin, which are both antimicrobial peptide.55,66,76,77 Cathelicidin enhances the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines while decreasing the synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines. As a result, vitamin D deficiency could increase the risk of sepsis and inflammation in severely ill patients by diminishing the immune response and modulatory effects on innate immunity.7883

Furthermore, several COVID-19 pandemic studies contained some substantial biases and were not representative of the real-world conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic.84,85 In regions where authorities implemented home isolation and social distancing measures, individuals with mild to moderate cases of COVID-19 were generally not hospitalized.84,86 In contrast, in urban areas experiencing a high prevalence of COVID-19 cases and facing constraint intensive care resources, particularly mechanical ventilation, the majority of the hospital admissions were primarily for the individuals with severe or critical cases of COVID-19.84,8789 Hospitalized people from a single center or a few centers were unlikely to represent the distribution of COVID-19 cases in an area. Also, there were evident selection biases in why and where people were hospitalized in these studies.84,90,91 Multiple studies have reported the presence of censoring among subjects who were still hospitalized leading to potential biases in the interpretation of the findings.84,87,92 On the contrary, we were able to identify every COVID-19 patient in our area, all of whom were admitted to the hospital. We also conducted a comprehensive follow-up for all the patients. The characteristics of our subjects were more similar to they who were exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 infection in a non-epidemic setting. As the result, our study provided a significant potential for widespread applicability and reflected the real-world conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic.84,9395

The strength of this study lies in the fact that it is the first study to analyze the ISARIC-4C Score in COVID-19 patients with deficient vitamin D. The majority of this study’s data were collected during the Omicron variation’s development and can be utilized to make comparisons to the Delta variant or any other variants. However, this study has several limitations that should be considered to improve the further research. First, this study did not include a healthy control group as a reference population. Second, after patients were discharged, serum 25(OH) D levels were not measured. Third, the observational design and small sample size could potentially miss an important finding in this present study. Fourth, we did not collect any information on the use of vitamin D supplementation. Fifth, it was not possible to determine the impact of disease on vitamin D levels due to reverse causality. Furthermore, considering the established associations between vitamin D levels and comorbidities, and relationship between comorbidities and COVID-19 outcomes, it is difficult not to consider the possibility that vitamin D may become an epiphenomenon typically present in those with a more severe disease.

Hence, despite these limitations, our study clearly showed that lower vitamin D levels at admission represent a strong and reliable factor predicting worse outcomes. We demonstrates that hospitalized COVID-19 patients with vitamin D deficiency had a higher risk of using mechanical ventilation and mortality from respiratory failure and other complications. Additionally, a prior meta-analysis revealed that people with a deficient vitamin D level had an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19-related hospitalization. Our data are consistent with the findings of recent pilot studies and a meta-analysis showing that a sufficient vitamin D status is able to reduce COVID-19 severity, indicating that it may be beneficial in minimizing the clinical and economic burden associated with COVID-19.1,9698

Conclusion

We found that lower serum 25(OH) D levels were associated with an increased number of comorbidities, COVID-19 severity, and the use of mechanical ventilation. COVID-19 patients with vitamin D deficiency status were significantly associated with having cardiovascular disease, mortality, more severe COVID-19 cases, and the used of high-flow nasal canule (HFNC) or ventilator. This study doesn’t diminish the significance of the continuing vaccine effort against the health-economic burden of SARS-CoV-2 infection. As a result, we strongly suggest achieving sufficient vitamin D status, which may serve as an important adjuvant strategy to improve clinical outcomes before vaccines become widely available.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 4
VERSION 4 PUBLISHED 13 Apr 2023
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Rachman A, Rahmaniyah R, Khomeini A and Iriani A. The association between vitamin D deficiency and the clinical outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 2 not approved]. F1000Research 2024, 12:394 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.132214.4)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 4
VERSION 4
PUBLISHED 05 Feb 2024
Revised
Views
4
Cite
Reviewer Report 27 Feb 2024
Luigi di Filippo, Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Sciences, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy 
Approved
VIEWS 4
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
di Filippo L. Reviewer Report For: The association between vitamin D deficiency and the clinical outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 2 not approved]. F1000Research 2024, 12:394 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.162135.r243971)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Version 3
VERSION 3
PUBLISHED 11 Sep 2023
Revised
Views
12
Cite
Reviewer Report 19 Jan 2024
Guo-Xun Chen, Department of Nutrition, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA;  College of Food Science and Technology at Huazhong Agricultural University, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China 
Not Approved
VIEWS 12
The association studies like this does not ensure that there is a role of vitamin D (VD) deficiency in COVID-19 outcomes. VD deficiency has been associated with many diseases. However, its supplementation appears to lack conclusions. It will be helpful ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Chen GX. Reviewer Report For: The association between vitamin D deficiency and the clinical outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 2 not approved]. F1000Research 2024, 12:394 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.155718.r233579)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 22 Mar 2024
    Andhika Rachman, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Referral Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Centra Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
    22 Mar 2024
    Author Response
    Dear Doctor Guo-xun Chen,
    Thank you for your valuable advice.

    The objective of this study was to examine the association between vitamin D serum level deficiency and the clinical ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 22 Mar 2024
    Andhika Rachman, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Referral Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Centra Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
    22 Mar 2024
    Author Response
    Dear Doctor Guo-xun Chen,
    Thank you for your valuable advice.

    The objective of this study was to examine the association between vitamin D serum level deficiency and the clinical ... Continue reading
Views
12
Cite
Reviewer Report 04 Jan 2024
Luigi di Filippo, Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Sciences, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 12
Dear Editor,
thanks for the opportunity to revise the manuscript “Impact of vitamin D deficiency in relation to the clinical outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients” submitted by Dr. Rachman et al.
The authors aimed to evaluate the impact ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
di Filippo L. Reviewer Report For: The association between vitamin D deficiency and the clinical outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 2 not approved]. F1000Research 2024, 12:394 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.155718.r233590)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 22 Mar 2024
    Andhika Rachman, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Referral Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Centra Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
    22 Mar 2024
    Author Response
    Dear Doctor Luigi di Filippo,
    Thank you for your and time consideration in handling our manuscript.

    1. The main limitation of the study is in assessment of vitamin D ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 22 Mar 2024
    Andhika Rachman, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Referral Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Centra Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
    22 Mar 2024
    Author Response
    Dear Doctor Luigi di Filippo,
    Thank you for your and time consideration in handling our manuscript.

    1. The main limitation of the study is in assessment of vitamin D ... Continue reading
Views
15
Cite
Reviewer Report 17 Oct 2023
Parvaiz Koul, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India 
Not Approved
VIEWS 15
While the authors have made changes and updated the references, the moot question of hospitalising mild cases of COVID remains unanswered and that in my opinion is a significant enough reason for me to recommend 'Not Approved' for the revision ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Koul P. Reviewer Report For: The association between vitamin D deficiency and the clinical outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 2 not approved]. F1000Research 2024, 12:394 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.155718.r205417)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Version 2
VERSION 2
PUBLISHED 13 Jun 2023
Revised
Views
35
Cite
Reviewer Report 29 Aug 2023
Parvaiz Koul, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India 
Not Approved
VIEWS 35
The manuscript provides an analysis of vitamin D levels in 189 patients with COVID-19 in Indonesia and correlates the vitamin D levels with the outcomes of illness using ISARIC-4C mortality score among others. While the concept of the study is ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Koul P. Reviewer Report For: The association between vitamin D deficiency and the clinical outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 2 not approved]. F1000Research 2024, 12:394 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.148441.r197568)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 11 Sep 2023
    Andhika Rachman, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Referral Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Centra Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
    11 Sep 2023
    Author Response
    Dear Prof. Parvaiz Koul,
    We sincerely appreciate the time and consideration you have provided in reviewing our manuscript.

    We would like to confirm that we have made revisions to ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 11 Sep 2023
    Andhika Rachman, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Referral Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Centra Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
    11 Sep 2023
    Author Response
    Dear Prof. Parvaiz Koul,
    We sincerely appreciate the time and consideration you have provided in reviewing our manuscript.

    We would like to confirm that we have made revisions to ... Continue reading
Views
14
Cite
Reviewer Report 14 Jun 2023
Shaun Sabico, Department of Biochemistry College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia 
Approved
VIEWS 14
I commend the authors for satisfactorily addressing ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Sabico S. Reviewer Report For: The association between vitamin D deficiency and the clinical outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 2 not approved]. F1000Research 2024, 12:394 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.148441.r178400)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 13 Apr 2023
Views
45
Cite
Reviewer Report 11 May 2023
Shaun Sabico, Department of Biochemistry College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 45
The present prospective study by Rachman and colleagues analyzed the impact of vitamin D deficiency among covid-19 patients and found that those who had more comorbidities and had more severe manifestations of covid-19 were more likely to be vitamin D ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Sabico S. Reviewer Report For: The association between vitamin D deficiency and the clinical outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 2 not approved]. F1000Research 2024, 12:394 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.145122.r169546)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 13 Jun 2023
    Andhika Rachman, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Referral Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Centra Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
    13 Jun 2023
    Author Response
    Response To The Reviewer:

    Dear Dr. Shaun Sabico,
    We would like to thank you for your time and consideration in handling our manuscript.

    We want to confirm that ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 13 Jun 2023
    Andhika Rachman, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Referral Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Centra Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
    13 Jun 2023
    Author Response
    Response To The Reviewer:

    Dear Dr. Shaun Sabico,
    We would like to thank you for your time and consideration in handling our manuscript.

    We want to confirm that ... Continue reading

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 4
VERSION 4 PUBLISHED 13 Apr 2023
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.