Investigating the link between frontal sinus morphology and craniofacial characteristics with sex: A 3D CBCT study on the South Indian population

Introduction

Determining the identity of human remains through visual assessment of craniofacial parameters using linear measurements is a common practice in forensic science. Unfortunately, accidents, natural disasters, and fires can cause severe decomposition or damage to the body, making identification difficult. In these cases, anthropological knowledge is crucial in identifying the remains. The skull, being the most complex and stable part of the human body, can withstand force and assist in forensic investigations.¹

The frontal sinus is a crucial component of the human skull, located in the pneumatized cavity of the frontal bone. While typically paired, these sinuses are seldom symmetrical and can vary in size. Radiographically visible by the 2nd or 3rd year of life, the frontal sinus completes its growth by the age of 20. Interestingly, these sinuses are unique to each individual, even when compared in monozygotic twins.² By analyzing the shape and size of the frontal sinus, we can gain valuable insights into an individual's craniofacial parameters. This information can be used to diagnose and treat various medical conditions, including sinusitis and facial trauma. It is important to note that the morphology of the frontal sinus can vary significantly between individuals, making it a valuable tool in personalized medicine.

Radiographs are crucial in identifying anthropological structures when DNA samples and soft tissues are not accessible. Radiology plays a significant role in determining these structures, particularly when considering morphological parameters.³ Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a cutting-edge diagnostic imaging technique that provides a three-dimensional view of a specific region in the head and neck. This technology allows for the visualization of anatomical structures from different angles, without any superimposition, distortion, or magnification. The accuracy of measurements obtained through CBCT makes it a superior imaging modality compared to traditional two-dimensional imaging.⁴ One of the most significant advantages of CBCT is its cost-effectiveness, as well as its ability to expose individuals to less radiation. This makes it a safer and more accessible option for patients. While CBCT has been widely used in the field of anthropology, it has recently gained more attention in the field of forensic identification.⁵

Numerous studies have been conducted in the past using radiographs to assess the importance of the frontal sinus in determining an individual's characteristics. However, very few studies have been conducted using CBCT in the South Indian population. Our study aims to fill this gap by focusing on the South Indian population, which has distinct craniofacial features compared to other populations. Through this research, we hope to enhance the understanding of the relationship between frontal sinus morphology and craniofacial parameters in this specific population.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the morphological structure of the frontal sinuses and compare it with the nasal, maxillary, cranial and the mandible widths. This information can be useful in identifying and determining human characteristics.

Methods

Measurements

The linear measurements were done on the reconstructed image in the following way (Figure 1):

• • Frontal sinus - For assessment of maximum supero-inferior measurements, the coronal section was utilized and measurement was taken between the highest and lowest point of both the right and left frontal sinus, while the axial section was used to measure the maximum antero-posterior and mesiodistal width of the left and right frontal sinus.

• • Cranium - For the measurement of the maximum width of the cranium, the axial section was adjusted to the level of the superior border of the orbit (while looking at the coronal view), and at this level, measurement was taken from the inner cortical plate on one side to the inner cortical plate on the contralateral side.

• • Nasal - The maximal nasal width was taken in the axial section after adjusting it at the level of the zygomatic arch.

• • Maxilla - Axial section was skimmed till the maximal width of the maxilla was observed and in this section, measurement was taken.

• • Mandibular width at antegonial notch - The maximum width of the mandible was taken at the level of the antegonial notch. For this purpose, first, the axial view was angulated so that in the sagittal section, the gonial and antegonial notch were observed. The axial view was then adjusted to the level of the antegonial notch and in this section, the maximal mandibular width was taken.

Figure 1. Cone-beam computed tomography image showing the measurements of A) mesio-distal dimension of frontal sinus; B) antero-posterior measurement of frontal sinus; C) supero-inferior measurement of frontal sinus; D) cranial width; E) nasal width; F) maxillary width; G) mandibular width.

Results

There was asymmetry detected of the frontal sinus in all the patients in terms of the mesiodistal, anteroposterior and superoinferior dimensions with the majority showing the left side larger than the right side.²⁴ However, only the anteroposterior dimension was significantly more on the left side in males (p-value 0.012, paired-test) (Table 1).

Mandibular parameter correlates moderately with anteroposterior dimension on the left and right side in males but not in females. The anteroposterior dimension of the left side and the mesiodistal dimension of the left side correlate significantly (r=0.357, p=0.003) in males but not in females. On the other hand, the anteroposterior dimension of the right side correlates with the mesiodistal dimension of the right side in both females and males. The cranial parameter shows a moderate negative correlation with the anteroposterior dimension of the left side (r value of-0.235, p-value of 0.039) and nasal dimension (r value of -0.248, p-value of 0.03) in females but not in males. Maxillary dimension showed a significant positive correlation with mandible (r value of 0.326 and p value of 0.004) in females and not in males. Nasal dimensions correlated with superoinferior dimensions on the right side in females (0.233 and p-value of 0.041) but not in males. Superoinferior dimensions correlated positively with mesiodistal as well as anteroposterior dimensions in males and females (p<0.05, r ranges from 0.248 to 0.461) (Table 2).

An independent t-test was done to compare the measurements between the two sexes and it was found that there was a statistically significant difference between them. The frontal sinus, nasal, cranial, maxillary and mandibular widths were higher in males when compared to the females and this was statistically significant except for the nasal width, cranial and mesiodistal measurements of the frontal sinus (Table 3).

Comparing the discriminant function scores we found that the male values are consistently higher than the female values in all the cases. The discriminant function equations and the demarcation points are given in Table 4. The highest accuracy was seen with the mandibular width with 68.3% accuracy, followed by anteroposterior left dimensions with 66.90%. Both the mandible and the left anterior-posterior dimensions were more accurate in females than in males. The other variables like the superio-inferior and mesio-distal measurements of frontal sinus and nasal dimensions were below 60% accuracy. The discriminant function equations can be used with sectioning points of roughly zero to demarcate the sex.

Discussion

Sex, age and stature are crucial factors in identifying unknown individuals through skeletal remains, especially when the body is decomposed or fragmented beyond recognition. Radiographs are often used to aid in this process, as the anatomic structures and their variations are unique to each individual.⁷ In forensic dentistry, craniometric parameters also play a significant role in both postmortem and antemortem evaluations of bodies. Cranial dimensions vary among different populations, and measuring the cranium can help determine racial differences.⁸ Zuckerkandl reported in 1895 that the morphology of the frontal sinus is unique to each individual and can be used for identification purposes.⁹ Our study was a retrospective cone beam computed tomographic study, utilizing archived images from the South-Indian population, specifically a subset of the Dakshina Kannada district on the West coast of India. This research aims to establish specific anthropometric patterns for different populations, highlighting the importance of considering regional variations in forensic investigations.

The frontal sinus is a structure that becomes visible on radiographs at around 5-6 years of age and stops growing around 20 years.⁷ It is intriguing to note that no two individuals have the same frontal sinus.¹⁰ Research has shown that the frontal sinus is larger in males than in females,^11–13 which is consistent with our own findings. Moreover, when comparing the size of the frontal sinus on each side, we observed that the left side was larger than the right side. This finding is in line with previous studies conducted by Rubira-Bullen IR et al. (2010), Kanat A et al. (2015), Soman BA et al. (2016), and Denny C et al. (2018),^12–16 but not with the study by Camargo et al. 2007.¹¹ The difference in size could be attributed to the independent development of the sinuses, resulting in varying sizes even among individuals of the same age.¹⁴ Kanat et al. (2015)¹⁵ suggested that handedness and footedness may play a role in predicting cerebral dominance, with right-handed individuals exhibiting left hemispheric dominance and vice versa for left-handed individuals.

In summary, the frontal sinus is a distinctive anatomical structure that exhibits variations in size and shape among individuals. Our study corroborates previous research indicating that males tend to have larger frontal sinuses than females, and that the left side is typically larger than the right. These differences may be attributed to independent development and handedness/footedness, which could potentially impact cerebral dominance.

Our study found that the maximal cranial width measurement was comparable to the research conducted by Ulcay T and Kamaşak B (2021).¹⁷ Additionally, we discovered that cranial width was significantly greater in males than in females.^18,19 This dimorphism in the male skull is attributed to pubertal changes that result in increased muscular attachments, while the female skull retains juvenile features.²⁰

According to a study conducted by Buyuk SK (2017), it was discovered that males have a greater maxillary width than females.⁶ Dr. G Venkat Rao and G Kiran (2016), stated in their article that dental arch width is indicative of the size of the basal bone. As the basal bone of the jaws is larger in males, this explains why males have a larger maxillary arch.²¹

The width of the mandible was found to be greater in males, which is consistent with the findings of previous studies conducted by Sreelekha D et al. (2020)²² and Albalawi AS et al. (2019).³

The present study investigated nasal width in both males and females and determined that there were no significant differences between the two groups. This finding is consistent with previous research conducted by Buyuk SK (2017) and M. I. Marini et al. (2020).^6,23

Spearman's correlation analysis reveals that there is a significant correlation between the right side anterolateral and mesiodistal/superior inferior dimensions in both males and females. Additionally, mandibular dimensions show a significant correlation with anteroposterior dimensions in males, while cranial dimensions exhibit a negative correlation with anteroposterior and nasal dimensions in females. Furthermore, maxillary dimensions display a significant correlation with anteroposterior and mandibular dimensions in females.

These observations can provide valuable insights for future research by comparing findings across different ethnicities and nationalities. However, to ensure a more accurate representation of the population, it is necessary to conduct further studies with larger sample sizes.

Conclusions

Cone beam computed tomography has revolutionized the way we approach diagnostic imaging, providing a more comprehensive and accurate view of the head and neck region. Its benefits extend beyond the medical field, making it an essential tool for forensic investigations. With its increasing popularity, CBCT is sure to continue to play a vital role in the future of diagnostic imaging.

This study has the potential to offer valuable insights to medical professionals and researchers in the field of craniofacial medicine. By leveraging advanced imaging technology and focusing on a specific population, we can gain a deeper understanding of the intricate relationship between the frontal sinus and craniofacial parameters.