Active adults have thicker peripheral muscles and diaphragm: A cross-sectional study

Aishwarya Shetty; Baskaran Chandrasekaran; Koustubh Kamath; Sneha Ravichandran; Rajagopal Kadavigere; Leena R David; Banumathe Karuppaya; Guruprasad Vijayasarathi; Suresh Sukumar

doi:10.12688/f1000research.135379.2

Home Browse Active adults have thicker peripheral muscles and diaphragm: A cross-sectional...

ALL Metrics

Views

Downloads

Get PDF

Get XML

Export

▬

✚

Research Article

Revised

Active adults have thicker peripheral muscles and diaphragm: A cross-sectional study

[version 2; peer review: 2 approved with reservations, 3 not approved]

Aishwarya Shetty¹, Baskaran Chandrasekaran², Koustubh Kamath¹, [...] Sneha Ravichandran¹, Rajagopal Kadavigere³, Leena R David^1,4, Banumathe Karuppaya⁵, Guruprasad Vijayasarathi⁶, Suresh Sukumar ¹

Aishwarya Shetty¹, Baskaran Chandrasekaran², [...] Koustubh Kamath¹, Sneha Ravichandran¹, Rajagopal Kadavigere³, Leena R David^1,4, Banumathe Karuppaya⁵, Guruprasad Vijayasarathi⁶, Suresh Sukumar ¹

PUBLISHED 29 Sep 2023

Author details Author details

¹ Department of Medical Imaging Technology Manipal, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India
² Department of Exercise and Sports Sciences, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India
³ Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Kasturba Medical College Manipal,, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
⁴ Dept. of Medical Diagnostic Imaging, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
⁵ Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Manipal College of Health Professions Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
⁶ Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India

Aishwarya Shetty
Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Baskaran Chandrasekaran
Roles: Data Curation, Validation

Koustubh Kamath
Roles: Resources

Sneha Ravichandran
Roles: Writing – Review & Editing

Rajagopal Kadavigere
Roles: Supervision, Validation

Leena R David
Roles: Writing – Review & Editing

Banumathe Karuppaya
Roles: Visualization

Guruprasad Vijayasarathi
Roles: Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Suresh Sukumar
Roles: Data Curation, Resources

OPEN PEER REVIEW

REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Manipal Academy of Higher Education gateway.

Abstract

Background: The association between exercise and muscle build-up is a long-run connection. Whereas limited physical activity doesn't do well with muscle build-up. But how much is that difference in muscle thickness between different levels of physical activity? Aim: To understand this we conducted a cross-sectional study to associate physical activity and sitting time with the muscle thickness of the lower limb and diaphragm. Methods: The research's participants ranged in age from 18 to 35. Out of 91 patients, 30 were found to smoke routinely and 6 had a drinking history after questions concerning lifestyle factors including smoking and drinking were questioned. In terms of occupation, 74.7% of people had an occupation and 25% were unemployed. We acquired ultrasonography for the quadriceps (rectus femoris and vastus intermedialis), soleus muscle, and diaphragm. Participants were divided into groups according to their self-reported levels of physical activity and sitting time based on IPAQ scores. Results: We found that the lower limb muscles have shown statistically significant differences between vigorous physical activity (VPA) and lower physical activity (LPA). We found that the quadriceps muscle(rectus femoris and vastus intermedialis) thickness was 1.3 cm in LPA whereas 2.8 cm in VPA with (p=<0.001) soleus muscle thickness being 1 cm in LPA and 2.2 cm. Conclusions: Physical activity levels are found to be positively related to the peripheral muscle thickness VPA (p=<0.001). Physical activity levels are found to be positively related to peripheral muscle thickness.

Keywords

Sedentary behavior; Muscle thickness; Diaphragm; Physical activity; Ultrasonography

Corresponding authors: Guruprasad Vijayasarathi, Suresh Sukumar

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Copyright: © 2023 Shetty A et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite: Shetty A, Chandrasekaran B, Kamath K et al. Active adults have thicker peripheral muscles and diaphragm: A cross-sectional study [version 2; peer review: 2 approved with reservations, 3 not approved]. F1000Research 2023, 12:836 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.135379.2) First published: 17 Jul 2023, 12:836 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.135379.1) Latest published: 29 Sep 2023, 12:836 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.135379.2)

Revised Amendments from Version 1

We have corrected the article based on reviewers’ suggestions with slight modifications in the methodology, a revised figure 1, and general minor changes throughout the manuscript.

See the authors' detailed response to the review by Małgorzata Pałac
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Ranganath Gangavelli

Introduction

Physical activity (PA) (any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles that require energy expenditure) is crucial for potential health benefits and protection against chronic diseases.¹ Insufficient physical activity and sedentary behavior (SB) (any waking behavior characterized by an energy expenditure of 1.5 metabolic equivalents (METS) or less while sitting or reclining) are now associated with an increased risk of cardiometabolic disease and cancer.² Experimental studies have administered several interventions to address the increasing burden of physical inactivity and SB. However, observational studies have established a relationship between PA and SB, with the health risks remaining still unclear, as there could be health risks associated with SB.³

Muscle mass and strength are predictors of performance enhancement and ability to work in adults and mobility functions in the elderly population.⁴ Furthermore, peripheral muscle mass and strength are associated with chronic diseases like sarcopenia which is a major risk and early mortality. Though anecdotal evidence claims a bidirectional relationship between physical inactivity and peripheral muscle strength or thickness, observational studies establishing the relationship are lacking. In young, healthy people, there is a substantial correlation between overall muscular strength and higher-intensity PA, and age-related reductions in muscle size and strength have been seen to coincide with lower activity levels.⁵^–⁷ According to our knowledge,³ a person’s level of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) is associated with broader benefits including improved cardiorespiratory fitness and total work capacity, but not directly to muscle growth and strength.⁵^,⁸ The evidence regarding the relationship between levels of PA and the peripheral muscle (soleus, gastrocnemius, and diaphragm) is still debatable using an ultrasonogram.

We hypothesized that: 1) there is a possible change in the muscle thickness and strength of individuals engaged in some PA compared to a sedentary lifestyle, and 2) a change in the thickness of muscles changes as age progresses.⁹ Hence we aimed to relate various dimensions of PA and sitting time with the diaphragm & lower limb muscle thickness.

Methods

Study design

This study was a prospective single-centered randomized crossover trial conducted between January 2022 to November 2022 in the Department of Radio-diagnosis and Imaging, Kasturba medical hospital, Manipal, India. Institutional Ethics Committee, KH (IEC2: 125/2022) and Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2022/10/046187) https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/rmaindet.php?trialid=72850&EncHid=34225.86311&modid=1&compid=19 approved the study. Figure 1 depicts this methodology.

Figure 1. STROBE flow diagram showing the inclusion of participants.

Participants

We recruited the potential participants from the patients who were waiting for the radiological screening from the radiological department of the multidisciplinary teaching hospital. The written consent was obtained from the participants, also they were asked about their basic details which included history of smoking and alcohol consumption. The participants were first screened for the exclusion factors like recent trauma, orthopedic interventions, bed-ridden, paralyzed, osteoarthritis, and other chronic diseases of the heart and lungs which can hamper the diaphragm thickness. Hence, we included both male and female patients aged 18 – 35 old for the following study.

Physical activity

Self-reported PA was assessed using Short International Physical Activity Questionnaire (S-IPAQ) for young and middle-aged adults. The questionnaire evaluates the amount of time (frequency and duration) spent engaging in activities of vigorous, moderate intensity, walking, and sitting over the course of the previous seven days. The vigorous, moderate, and walking intensities were quantified as 8, 4, and 3.3 metabolic equivalents (METS).

Sample size calculation

We required 91 samples to achieve a moderate correlation (r1 > 0.4) at an alpha level of 95% and an 80% strength. The algorithm for determining the cumulative correlation coefficient distribution is used in all analyses.¹⁰

Muscle thickness

The lower limb muscles measured in this study were the soleus and quadricep muscle (rectus femoris and vastus intermedialis) in both limbs. For measuring the diaphragm, the patient was laid supine and measured at both inhalation and exhalation using the M Mode ultrasonography. The measurement pattern is depicted in Figure 2.

Figure 2. The thickness measurements of all the muscles.

A – Soleus, B – Quadriceps (rectus femoris and vastus intermedialis), C – Diaphragm inhalation, D – Diaphragm exhalation.

Procedure

We used the ultrasound machine with linear and curvilinear transducers for the following study. All patients were screened for their anterior quadriceps, soleus, and diaphragm measurements.

To measure the quadriceps

The anterior thigh muscle of all subjects will be measured using a 13MHz linear array probe. The B-model ultrasound was used to identify the anterior quadriceps muscle. The patient will be placed in a supine posture with their knees extended and their feet in a neutral position. The distance that lies between the anterior fascia of the rectus femoris muscle (RF) and the posterior fascia of the vastus intermedius muscle will be evaluated to calculate the anterior thigh muscle thickness (TMT). An axial cross-sectional image of the anterior quadricep muscle is obtained of both limbs and recorded.¹¹

To measure the soleus

An ultrasound with a 13 MHz linear probe was used on distal 1/3 of the calf length which was used to obtain soleus muscle imaging. The B-model ultrasound was used to identify the soleus muscle. Participants were oriented in a prone position, knees outstretched and 0° dorsiflexion of the ankle or knees bent at 30° in the prone position with a pillow underneath. To keep track of muscle movement, the ultrasound device was switched to M-mode to trace motion.¹²

To measure the diaphragm

The chest wall was aligned perpendicularly with a 13-MHz linear array transducer. Using M-mode, the diaphragmatic thickness was determined. Tdi, ee (Diaphragmatic thickness at end-expiration) and Tdi, pi (peak inspiration) measurements were already taken on consecutive breaths, which were seen in a single M-mode image. The diaphragmatic thickness was determined as the distance between the diaphragmatic pleura and the peritoneum. The thickness of the diaphragm for each experiment has been recorded as one value was taken on inhalation and exhalation.¹³^,¹⁴

Results

The study included 91 patients aged 18 to 35 with N = 78 male subjects with mean age and standard deviation of 27 ± 4.67 and N = 13 females with mean age and standard deviation of 28 ± 4.67.

Baseline characteristics

In responses to inquiries on lifestyle factors including drinking and smoking, it was discovered that 30 of the 91 patients smoked frequently and 6 had drinking habits. The following data is shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Patient’s characteristics.

Variables		Mean ± SD	Number (%)
Lifestyle	Smoking	Chronic N = 30 [28.01 ± 4.509]	32.96
		Occasional N = 15 [27.61 ± 4.338]	16.48
		Nonsmoker N = 45 [27.9 ± 4.885]	49.45
	Alcohol	Chronic N = 6 [27.85 ± 3.109]	6.59
		Occasional N = 39 [27.90 ± 4.29]	42.85
		Nonalcoholic N = 45 [27.97 ± 4.67]	49.45
Physical activity levels	Vigorous	N = 39 [27.9 ± 4.375]	42.85
	Moderate	N = 46 [27.83 ± 4.749]	50.54
	Walking	N = 6 [27.77 ± 2.516]	6.59

Physical activity among the participants

The participants were divided into three distinct categories: low (n = 6), intermediate (n = 46), and high METS score (n = 39, 42.85%). The results showed that the low METS score was 500.66 minutes per week, the moderate METS score was 1969.69 minutes per week, and the high METS score was 4408.17 minutes per week.

Association between muscle thickness and physical activity

Based on the PA and IPAQ scores, we divided patients into low, moderate, and high PA. When we compared the muscle thickness with the PA, we found the following results. The left and right quadriceps values (rectus femoris and vastus intermedialis) were significantly increased as PA increased.

We found that the association between PA and muscle thickness was significant in the lower limb muscles, with a p-value lower than 0.01. The diaphragm thickness showed a positive association with PA but was not statistically significant, as the p-value were 0.35 for inhalation and 0.17 for exhalation. The data are presented in Table 2. The Pearson correlation results for lower limb muscle thickness with the PA levels are depicted in Figure 3. All the graphs depict a positive correlation between muscle thickness and PA (Figure 3).

Table 2. Thickness values in comparison with PA.

Muscle	Low PA	Moderate PA	High PA	Volume (Met/Min/Week)	Pearson coefficient	p-value
Left quadriceps (rectus femoris and vastus intermedialis) (cm)	1.3	1.79	2.8	0.651	0.653	<0.001
Right quadriceps (rectus femoris and vastus intermedialis) (cm)	1.3	1.78	2.8	0.647	0.709	<0.001
Left soleus (cm)	1.0	1.56	2.2	0.706	0.68	<0.001
Right soleus (cm)	1.0	1.55	2.2	0.665	0.646	<0.001
Inspiration diaphragm (mm)	0.19	0.25	0.29	0.057	0.097	0.358
Expiration diaphragm (mm)	0.18	0.23	0.27	-0.106	-0.143	0.178

Figure 3. Shows the correlation between lower limb muscle thickness to the PA.

Professional status and PA

Desk-based workers mostly lead a sedentary lifestyle hence their PA level was comparatively lower than those who had an active lifestyle.¹⁵ In the majority of the studies, unemployment is detrimental to health behavior.¹⁵ Furthermore, it is believed that both the physical and social environments play an important role. In addition, Owen et al. reported that adult participation in PA was influenced by a range of personal, social, and environmental factors and those individual-level variables such as socioeconomic status and perceived self-efficacy demonstrated the strongest association with PA behavior (sitting time, workout time).¹⁵^,¹⁶

Discussion

Our study aimed to look for the possible relationship between muscle thickness and various levels of PA. According to our research concept, the research was focused on a few factors, including age, appropriate muscles for this investigation, and potential repercussions.¹⁷

Physical activity levels in the participants

A total of 91 patients were included in our study, of which six were sorted into the LPA, N = 46 for moderate PA, and N = 39 for VPA; these make about 7% of the participants perform LPA, 50% with moderate PA, and 43% with VPA. Previous studies that have considered a larger population in India have found that around 54% of the total sample they had were physically inactive, and 14% had high PA.¹⁸ Internationally, around 15.8% of the people in East and Southeast Asia are physically inactive.¹⁹

Muscle thickness in the participants

In our study, we observed that the soleus muscle thickness was 1 cm in LPA and 2.2 cm in VPA (p = 0.001), while the quadriceps muscle thickness (rectus femoris and vastus intermedialis) was 1.3 cm in LPA and 2.8 cm in VPA. The diaphragm thickness was 0.19 cm in LPA and 0.29 (p = 0.358) in PA. A study by Schoenfeld observed the difference in the muscle thickness for low versus high resistance exercises and found that the high resistance exercises were improving the quadriceps muscle thickness by 9.5%.²⁰ This supports our results that show that increased PA improves muscle thickness.

The study conducted by Silva et al. in 2010 observed that Asians have lower skeletal muscle mass as compared to African Americans, Whites, and Hispanics.²¹ The muscle thickness that we measured in our study without considering the PA level was 1.78 cm and 1.79 cm for the right and left quadriceps (rectus femoris and vastus intermedialis) respectively, and 1.55 cm and 1.56 cm for the right and left soleus muscles respectively.

The reason for selecting the quadriceps, soleus in the lower limb, and the diaphragm for the study were that many researchers have found that there is a change in muscle thickness as age progresses, and it differs with sex as well.²² In 2010 Katsuo Fujiwara et al. reported that compared to their contemporaries in their 20s, men and women who were at least 60 years old had significantly thinner gastrocnemius muscles. With regards to the soleus, neither sex’s age group showed any appreciable changes in soleus thickness. For the gastrocnemius but not the soleus, muscle thickness decreased more from age 40 to 79. These findings support the idea that the gastrocnemius deteriorates and atrophies more rapidly than the soleus. One of the variables that contribute to a decline in muscle strength is aging. Age generally results in a loss of muscle mass and strength.⁹ According to previous studies, men’s skeletal muscle degradation is correlated with age at about 27 years of age.¹³ With this clause, we have restricted our study age group to between 18–35 years. The diaphragm muscle thickness showed much less changes during inhalation and exhalation, which showed a negative association between inhalation and exhalation values. Enright et al. discovered that In healthy people, the dimensions of the diaphragm can be increased by weight training. The effect of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on diaphragm thickness has not been previously reported in healthy people.²³ In Enright et al.’s study the group demonstrated an increase in diaphragm thickness. The rise in diaphragm thickness might lead to improved pulmonary mechanics, enhanced inspiratory muscle efficiency, or even both.

In this study, we focused on the lower limb muscles and diaphragm to get a prospective idea of the relationship of these muscles with PA. When humans are physically active, the lower body is most engaged in these activities. PA could be as simple as walking or running. Most likely, the lower body muscles are active while the breathing pattern changes simultaneously, therefore the diaphragm is engaged too. Recent research has shown that diaphragm thickness changes with increased PA, such as weight training.²³ In addition, quadriceps, soleus, and gastrocnemius muscles show the greatest activation during the quiet standing posture. These muscles are also vigorously activated in the stance phase of walking to maintain the standing posture and generate forces for propulsion.

With all these factors as constants and variables, our study shows that positive correlation with physical activity levels, there is a significant increase in the quadriceps (rectus femoris and vastus intermedialis), soleus muscle and diaphragm thicknesses, with mean values of 1.3 cm, 1.78 cm and 2.8 cm in LPA, moderate PA and VPA respectively for the quadriceps muscle (rectus femoris and vastus intermedialis); 1 cm, 1.56 cm and 2.2 cm for soleus, and 0.19 mm, 0.25 mm and 0.29 mm for the diaphragm, with increasing PA levels from LPA to moderate PA to VPA respectively. The changes in the lower limbs showed statistically significant results.

Conclusions

Peripheral muscle thickness has been found to positively correlate with physical activity levels. However future trials should further expand the association with the objectively measured PA levels.

Limitations and recommendations

Due to the fact that the PA measures utilized in the study were self-reported, there is a risk of recalling bias and response bias. Instead of employing a self-reported questionnaire, future studies could use objectively assessed PA.

Using IPAQ, which provides subjective measurement, we were able to determine the patients’ PA parameters in the current study. Due to observational studies’ use of self-perceived PA, which is frequently unjustified, our comprehension of the association between PA and muscle thickness currently is still unclear. This calls for additional studies employing objectively measured PA.

The nature of the cross-sectional approach used in the research made it difficult to determine the actual link between PA and changes in muscle thickness. If one adopts this approach, one might have a better grasp of how lifestyle factors affect individual muscle strength. Future research should look into these lifestyle choices and take them into account since they can have an impact on these results. Understanding how PA and lifestyle choices affect muscular strength requires studies that demonstrate associations between changes in muscle thickness and PA.

Data availability

Underlying data

Harvard Dataverse: Active adults have thicker peripheral muscles and diaphragm: a cross-sectional study, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/MVFLMY.

This project contains the following underlying data:

- Aishwarya data sheet.xlsx

References

1. Warburton DER: Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2006 Mar 14; 174(6): 801–809. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
2. Mansoubi M, Pearson N, Clemes SA, et al.: Energy expenditure during common sitting and standing tasks: examining the 1.5 MET definition of sedentary behaviour. BMC Public Health. 2015 Dec 29; 15(1): 516. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
3. Spirduso W, Etnier J: Day Theme: Weil-Being, Quality of Life, and Cognitive Function Plenary Keynotes PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, WELLBEING, AND QUALITY OF LIFE THROUGH THE LIFESPAN PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN THE PREVENTION OE DEMENTIA. J. Aging Phys. Act. 2012; 20: S7–S101. Publisher Full Text
4. Wang DXM, Yao J, Zirek Y, et al.: Muscle mass, strength, and physical performance predicting activities of daily living: a meta-analysis. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020 Feb; 11(1): 3–25. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
5. Rostron ZP, Green RA, Kingsley M, et al.: Associations Between Measures of Physical Activity and Muscle Size and Strength: A Systematic Review. Arch. Rehabil. Res. Clin. Transl. 2021 Jun; 3(2): 100124. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
6. Leblanc A, Taylor BA, Thompson PD, et al.: Relationships between physical activity and muscular strength among healthy adults across the lifespan. Springerplus. 2015 Dec 28; 4(1): 557. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
7. Kalyani RR, Corriere M, Ferrucci L: Age-related and disease-related muscle loss: the effect of diabetes, obesity, and other diseases. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014 Oct; 2(10): 819–829. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
8. Rostron ZP, Green RA, Kingsley M, et al.: Associations Between Measures of Physical Activity and Muscle Size and Strength: A Systematic Review. Arch. Rehabil. Res. Clin. Transl. 2021 Jun; 3(2): 100124. Publisher Full Text
9. Fujiwara K, Asai H, Toyama H, et al.: Changes in muscle thickness of gastrocnemius and soleus associated with age and sex. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2010 Feb; 22(1): 24–30. Publisher Full Text
10. Bujang MA, Baharum N: Sample Size Guideline for Correlation Analysis. World J. Soc. Sci. Res. 2016 Mar 10; 3(1): 37. Publisher Full Text
11. Takahashi Y, Fujino Y, Miura K, et al.: Intra- and inter-rater reliability of rectus femoris muscle thickness measured using ultrasonography in healthy individuals. Ultrasound J. 2021 Dec 15; 13(1): 21. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
12. Fujiwara K, Asai H, Toyama H, et al.: Changes in muscle thickness of gastrocnemius and soleus associated with age and sex. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2010 Feb 25; 22(1): 24–30. Publisher Full Text
13. Boussuges A, Rives S, Finance J, et al.: Ultrasound Assessment of Diaphragm Thickness and Thickening: Reference Values and Limits of Normality When in a Seated Position. Front. Med. (Lausanne). 2021 Oct 27; 8. Publisher Full Text
14. Goligher EC, Laghi F, Detsky ME, et al.: Measuring diaphragm thickness with ultrasound in mechanically ventilated patients: feasibility, reproducibility and validity. Intensive Care Med. 2015 Apr 19; 41(4): 642–649. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
15. Macassa G, Ahmadi N, Alfredsson J, et al.: Employment status and differences in physical activity behavior during times of economic hardship: results of a population-based study. Int. J. Med. Sci. Public Health. 2016; 5(1): 102. Publisher Full Text
16. Van Domelen DR, Koster A, Caserotti P, et al.: Employment and Physical Activity in the U.S. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2011 Aug; 41(2): 136–145. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
17. Ikezoe T, Mori N, Nakamura M, et al.: Age-related muscle atrophy in the lower extremities and daily physical activity in elderly women. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2011 Sep; 53(2): e153–e157. Publisher Full Text
18. Anjana RM, Pradeepa R, Das AK, et al.: Physical activity and inactivity patterns in India – results from the ICMR-INDIAB study (Phase-1) [ICMR-INDIAB-5]. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2014 Dec 26; 11(1): 26. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
19. Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, et al.: Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants. Lancet Glob. Health. 2018 Oct; 6(10): e1077–e1086. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
20. Schoenfeld BJ, Peterson MD, Ogborn D, et al.: Effects of Low- vs. High-Load Resistance Training on Muscle Strength and Hypertrophy in Well-Trained Men. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2015 Oct; 29(10): 2954–2963. Publisher Full Text
21. Silva AM, Shen W, Heo M, et al.: Ethnicity-related skeletal muscle differences across the lifespan. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2010 Jan; 22(1): 76–82. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
22. IKEZOE T: Age-Related Change in Muscle Characteristics and Resistance Training for Older Adults. Phys. Ther. Res. 2020 Dec 20; 23(2): 99–105. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
23. Enright SJ, Unnitham VB, Heward C, et al.: Effect of high-intensity inspiratory muscle training on lung volumes, diaphragm thickness, and exercise capacity in subjects who are healthy. Phys. Ther. 2006; 86(3): 345–354. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2

VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 17 Jul 2023

Author details Author details

Aishwarya Shetty
Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Baskaran Chandrasekaran
Roles: Data Curation, Validation

Koustubh Kamath
Roles: Resources

Sneha Ravichandran
Roles: Writing – Review & Editing

Rajagopal Kadavigere
Roles: Supervision, Validation

Leena R David
Roles: Writing – Review & Editing

Banumathe Karuppaya
Roles: Visualization

Guruprasad Vijayasarathi
Roles: Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Suresh Sukumar
Roles: Data Curation, Resources

Competing interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Article Versions (2)

version 2

Revised

Published: 29 Sep 2023, 12:836

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.135379.2

version 1

Published: 17 Jul 2023, 12:836

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.135379.1

© 2023 Shetty A et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Download

Export To

metrics

	Views	Downloads
F1000Research	-	-
PubMed Central Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.	-	-

Citations

SEE MORE DETAILS

CITE

how to cite this article

Shetty A, Chandrasekaran B, Kamath K et al. Active adults have thicker peripheral muscles and diaphragm: A cross-sectional study [version 2; peer review: 2 approved with reservations, 3 not approved]. F1000Research 2023, 12:836 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.135379.2)

NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

track

receive updates on this article

Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?

Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE

ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested

Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.

Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Version 2

VERSION 2

PUBLISHED 29 Sep 2023

Revised

Views

Reviewer Report 04 Sep 2024

Ramprasad Muthukrishnan, Department of Physiotherapy, College of Health Science, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates

Renuka M, Physiotherpy, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates

Approved with Reservations

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.155807.r242606

Good work,
1. 'Active adults have thicker peripheral muscles and diaphragm' title can be re-written based on study aims and objectives. Is there a need of conclusive title really reflects world view? if conclusion drawn as study titles study methods need to be rigor and robust, such as RCT.

2. Why diaphragm is chosen along with peripheral muscles? is it convenient to do US scan? or any valid reasons?

3. Its mentioned that change in the thickness of muscles changes as age
progresses, but its not tested age wise. If the age group is restricted between 18-35 this
question being raised is appropriate?

4. Method-Wide range of age with comorbidities included would give more insight or would have done on normal individuals. Provide clear insights with reasoner?

5. In abstract and in title its mentioned cross-sectional study but in methodology its mentioned as single-centred randomized crossover trial. Is the study RCT? later changed? if changed permission from IRB would elucidate the readers?

6. Reasoning for no change in the diaphragm muscle is not discussed. Discussion would have provided more insights.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

I cannot comment. A qualified statistician is required.
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Back pain and motor control exercises, Neural correlates and executive functions, manual therapy

We confirm that we have read this submission and believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however we have significant reservations, as outlined above.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Views

Reviewer Report 10 May 2024

Dustin J Oranchuk, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA

Not Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.155807.r264818

General:
I like the general direction of the study and the findings are somewhat interesting.

The writing is understandable. However, the writing could be improved considerably. As an overall take, the writing is redundant and/or too wordy in places. While I do provide a few examples below, I encourage the authors to check the article throughout.

The methods are missing many important details, the most pressing being the lack of a data analysis (how were the images analysed) and statistical analysis (what software was used, what tests were run and why etc.) This is extremely important and frankly shocking that they are currently missing…

I really wanted to like the study, and it does have some strong points. However, the missing details and lacking analyses severely limit its use currently. While I do believe the authors can improve their work without any further data collection.

Title:
The title is good. The ‘A cross-sectional study’ is not needed, but the authors are free to leave this is they wish.

Abstract:
‘muscle build-up’ is an interesting way of stating it. However, I suggest changing it to ‘muscle mass’. If this change is made, please do so throughout the rest of the abstract and article.
Indeed, two sentences later, the authors bring up ‘muscle thickness’ (a proxy for muscle mass).
‘In terms of occupation’ can be deleted as the following portion of the sentence is clear without the preface.
‘We acquired ultrasonography for…’. Perhaps the authors would be better served by simply writing ‘muscle thickness for muscles X, Y, Z were determined via ultrasonography’?
Please use the ‘≤’ symbol, instead of “=<”

Introduction:
The introduction is quite clear and mostly well written.
In the second paragraph, the authors write ‘…like sarcopenia which is a major risk and early mortality’. Do the authors mean ‘…which is a major risk for early mortality.’

Methods:
Good work including the exact type of study and the exact dates that the study was conducted over.

Figure 1 is nice looking.

Could the authors include reliability and/or validity statistics (and a citation) for the S-IPAQ? Obviously, questionnaires hold some error, but including these statistics could help to understand how limiting this approach is.

While including sample size estimation is great, please include more details. Why as r1>0.4 selected? Do you have any similar studies that can be cited to support this number?
Figure 2 is also nice.

More detail is required for both the quadriceps and soleus measures. Specifically, where from distal to proximal were the scans obtained? For example, was the rectus femoris measured halfway between the anterior superior iliac spine and the base of the patella? Or some other landmarks? Was it 60% of the distance etc…? Same with the soleus, what landmarks and distances were used to find the desired region of each muscle.

Same with the diaphragm? Personally I am much less familiar with how to scan the diaphragm. Please provide more details and perhaps a citation to support the method.

What is the manufacturer information for the ultrasound machine?

The authors also need a ‘data processing’ section where they describe how the images were analysed. For example, were the images analysed on the
Maybe this is a peculiarity of the journal… but I do not see a ‘statistical analysis’ subsection.

The authors MUST be clear regarding what software was used (figures looks like JASP), what tests were run (correlations, t-tests, ANOVAs etc.) and their details, and how the findings were/are interpreted (what constitutes a good correlation, what cutoff is considered statistical significance, how are confidence intervals interpreted etc.). Very important.

Results:

The scatter plot(s) are nice and important to include, well done. It would be even better to include the 95% confidence intervals along with the Pearson’s correlation.

Discussion:
I am a bit confused by the sentence that reads “The diaphragm thickness was 0.19 cm in LPA and 0.29 (p = 0.358) in PA.” That p-value is the same p-value given in table 2. Is that the correlation p-value? Or a t-test p-value between diaphragm thickness in LPA and PA? These are not the same and should not be used interchangeably.

In reality, the authors can keep the correlational analysis, but should also perform an ANOVA (and post-hoc tests) to determine if the differences between physical activity tertiles (low, medium, and high) are significant. An effect size statistic (probably Cohen’s d) should also be used here.
The above addition can help with the interpretation of the entire study.

Conclusions should come after limitations.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

No
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

No
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

No
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Muscle morphology, physical performance, healthy ageing, strength and conditioning.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Views

Reviewer Report 10 Oct 2023

Suruliraj Karthikbabu, KMCH College of Physiotherapy, Dr NGP Research and Educational Trust, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

Approved with Reservations

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.155807.r188228

Thank you for the opportunity to review the article titled “Active adults have thicker peripheral muscles and diaphragm: A cross-sectional study”.
The authors found that adults with high physical activity had increased peripheral muscle thickness.

I appreciate the author's efforts in conducting this study. However, I find certain shortcomings in hypothesis testing and methodology, subsequently, interpreting the findings.

The subjective physical activity level of patients during the past week was correlated with lower limb muscle thickness and diaphragm. I wonder why were the patients included in the study. The criterion seems they have the disease for which medical advice was sought. Please motivate me how their physical activity profile was reliable!!

Short International Physical Activity Questionnaire (S-IPAQ) is a self-reported questionnaire that invites recall bias. Further, I’m afraid of how S-IPAQ is correlated with sensitivity tool ultrasonography. Ideally, the authors could have measured the physical activity using an objective measurement tool. Plus, justify using a parametric test, why not Spearman’s correlation co-efficiency!!

Having a small sample size in a cross-sectional study limits subgrouping them based on physical activity level and further analysis. Please motivate me on how this work is a cross-over design when the readings are taken at a single time point!!

There is vast evidence supporting that exercise training and physical activity have a beneficial effect on muscle thickness. What is the rationale for generating a hypothesis when clinical trials already tested it?

The hypothesis testing is not clear to me.

The muscle strength can be substituted as muscle thickness. As age progresses, thickness reduces. The authors never tested this. To test this hypothesis, one needs a cohort study design.

Age, smoking, and alcohol consumption being independent variables in this study never been analyzed and interpreted with stepwise multilinear regression analysis. I felt like the discussion section describes mostly the clinical variables, but lacks the reasoning for findings.

Many statements are not cited with appropriate references.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Version 1

VERSION 1

PUBLISHED 17 Jul 2023

Views

Reviewer Report 30 Aug 2023

Małgorzata Pałac, Musculoskeletal Elastography and Ultrasonography Laboratory, Institute of Physiotherapy and Health Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education, Katowice, Poland

Not Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.148494.r194233

I appreciate the work on this interesting and inspiring study. The article analyzes the muscles thickness of the lower limb and diaphragm with the level of physical activity. The study included a considerable number of participants. However, the article needs ... Continue reading

Not clear breathing maneuver during the diaphragm measurement:

“Using M-mode, the diaphragmatic thickness was determined. Tdi, ee (Diaphragmatic thickness at end-expiration) and Tdi, pi (peak inspiration) measurements were already taken on consecutive breaths, which were seen in a single M-mode image. The diaphragmatic thickness was measured before normal inhalation and after complete exhalation.” (methods)

In the first sentence diaphragm thickness was measured at the end-expiration and in peak inspiration. In the second sentence diaphragm thickness was measured before normal inhalation and after complete exhalation. It is not clear which information is true.

Secondly, no information was provided about where exactly the thickness measurements were taken from the images of muscles. This is not clear in Fig. 2.
Was the only one value collected from each photo? It would be better to describe it in the methodology section.
“The chest wall was aligned perpendicularly with a 13-MHz linear array transducer.” Is the diaphragm definitely measured by a linear probe?
Moreover, it would be appropriate to add information about the subjects' BMI.
The results include information about smoking and drinking alcohol. The method lacks information on how the data was collected.
Incorporating the interpretation of correlation results into the methodology and subsequently discussing them in the results and discussion sections is valuable. This approach contributes to a more accurate and insightful analysis of the results.
“To measure the quadriceps” section is described in the subchapter. "To measure the soleus and diaphragm" is listed as sub-items in the subchapter to “measure the quadriceps section”. It is better to divide all descriptions to subchapters. The information from “muscle thickness” subsection in the methodology seem to be redundant.

It is important to provide sufficient details of methods to allow replication and analysis by others.

2. The introduction and discussion contains interesting information, but it is good to confirm it with a citation. The information then looks more reliable, e.g.

“Muscle mass and strength are predictors of performance enhancement and ability to work in adults and mobility functions in the elderly population.” (introduction)
“Furthermore, peripheral muscle mass and strength are associated with chronic diseases like sarcopenia which is a major risk and early mortality”. (introduction)
“The reason for selecting the quadriceps, soleus in the lower limb, and the diaphragm for the study were that many researchers have found that there is a change in muscle thickness as age progresses, and it differs with sex as well.” (discussion) The sentence seems intended to explain why these particular muscles were selected for analysis. If that was the aim, what is missing is the citation indicating that these particular muscles change in thickness with age.

3. In introduction there is sentence: “Experimental studies have administered several interventions to address the increasing burden of physical inactivity and SB.”

Unfortunately, this information was not given in article.

4. The hypotheses are interesting, but they do not fully align with the research in this article.

5. "Anecdotal evidence" that are not scientifically proven should not be described, e.g.:

“Though anecdotal evidence claims a bidirectional relationship between physical inactivity and peripheral muscle strength or thickness, observational studies establishing the relationship are lacking.” (introduction)
If research has been done on this subject but not published, it is worth mentioning it. If not, it may be better to add this kind of suggestion in the discussion (if needed).

6. It is a very excellent idea to add a flow diagram regarding the qualification stage of participants. Unfortunately, the flow diagram needs improvement. It might look more aesthetically pleasing if the shape and size of the elements were unified.

In the flow diagram, the initial number of participants was 91, which is the same as the final number. Is it the same number for sure? Below "patients screened", "bedridden patients not screened for the study" is mentioned. This suggests that some people were excluded for this reason. However, the number of people excluded from the study for this reason was not reported. I think that in the flow chart it is worth specifying the initial number of people at the top. Then, the number of those excluded due to the exclusion criterion (as listed in the methodology: recent trauma, orthopedic interventions, bedridden, paralyzed, osteoarthritis, and other chronic diseases of the heart and lung).

7. The instruments need to be better characterized, with the manufacturer, city, state (if applicable), and country of manufacture, including the programs for data analysis used.

8. Some photos could have a better quality (Fig. 2) and not be cropped. I suggest transferring images to a computer, then choosing a clearly visible image. It would look better.

9. English in some places need improvement, e.g.

“The study included 91 patients aged 18 to 35 years with N = 78 male subjects with mean age and standard deviation of 27.954 years 4.67 and N = 13 females with mean age and standard deviation of 27.978 years 4.67.” (results)
“According to previoys studies, men’s skeletal muscle degradation is correlated with age at about 27 years of age. With this clause, we have restricted our study age group to between 18-35 years.” (discussion)

In these sentences authors should choose “age” or “years”.

Additionally, if a standard deviation is given for the age, it is sufficient for the average number of ages to be rounded to the nearest whole number (maximum of one decimal place). It looks more readable.
Moreover, in some sentences it says the "diaphragm thickness", in others the "diaphragm muscle thickness" (discussion). The diaphragm thickness is sufficient.

Considering this I recommend to send the manuscript to a fluent English-speaking person and ask them to correct the linguistic aspect of the manuscript.

10. Some information is redundant or repeated:

The number and age of participants are repeated twice in the results section (3 lines apart).

To simplify and not repeat the information, the first sentences from the results section can be placed in the baseline characteristic section.

Secondly, I don't see the purpose of providing employment information. Maybe it would be a good idea if the results were divided into two groups to show different correlations between employed and unemployed people. In the context of this work, perhaps a better question would be: Does the daily work performed by the participants involve physical or office work?
Thirdly, results given in the table are repeated in the text. This is not advisable. Moreover, several results from the text do not coincide with the results from the tables.

11. Table 1 needs improvement.

I would suggest changing the title of the table, e.g. Patients characteristics.
Also, remove the occupation information.
Some values are given to a whole number, some to 1 decimal place, some to 2 decimal places, others with 3 decimal places. This should be standardized.
There is a lack of explanation of abbreviations in the tables. Some of them are explained in the text it would be clearer to the reader if they were also placed below the table (the same as MET was explained).

12. Some of the sentences in the article are incorrect or stylistically/grammatically wrong which sometimes makes them seem unclear e.g.

“Out of 91 patients, 30 were found to regularly smoke, and six had drinking habits after questions regarding lifestyle characteristics including smoking and drinking were asked.” (results)
“This increase in diaphragm thickness may result in increased inspiratory muscle efficiency or improved pulmonary mechanics, or both.” (discussion)
“Recent studies have shown and proved that diaphragm muscle thickness changes with increased PA, e.g. weight training.” (discussion)

Just use one shown or proved.

“We required 91 samples to achieve a moderate correlation (r1 > 0.4) at an alpha level of 95% and an 80% strength.”

Is it certain that the version "rl" is the correct one?

“With all these factors as constants and variables, our study shows that with an increase in PA, there is a significant increase in the quadriceps (…).” (discussion)

The sentence is misleading. Muscle thickness was not studied with increasing physical activity. It was written in a better form in the conclusions: “Peripheral muscle thickness has been found to positively correlate with physical activity levels.”

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Respiratory muscle ultrasonography, Physiotherapy, Shear wave elastography

CITE

Report a concern

Author Response 06 Oct 2023

suresh sukumar , Department of Medical Imaging Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India

06 Oct 2023

Author Response
We are grateful for the comments and suggestions provided. we have tried to incorporate the changes and justified the same.
1. Inaccurate information in methodology.
... Continue reading
We are grateful for the comments and suggestions provided. we have tried to incorporate the changes and justified the same.

Inaccurate information in methodology.

Not clear breathing manoeuvre during the diaphragm measurement: In the first sentence diaphragm thickness was measured at the end-expiration and in peak inspiration. In the second sentence diaphragm thickness was measured before normal inhalation and after complete exhalation. It is not clear which information is true.

the diaphragmatic thickness was determined as the distance between the diaphragmatic pleura and the peritoneum at end-expiration (Tdi,ee) and peak inspiration (Tdi,pi). To be more specific we have mentioned as before normal inspiration.

Was the only one value collected from each photo? It would be better to describe it in the methodology section.

Yes only one value was measured – inspiration and expiration values.

“The chest wall was aligned perpendicularly with a 13-MHz linear array transducer.” Is the diaphragm definitely measured by a linear probe?

Yes a high frequency linear probe is used for better resolution and a wide field of view.

Moreover, it would be appropriate to add information about the subjects' BMI.

Unfortunately we haven’t collected the body mass index data .

The results include information about smoking and drinking alcohol. The method lacks information on how the data was collected.

The data was collected while the patient had to fill out the questionnaire.

To measure the quadriceps” section is described in the subchapter. "To measure the soleus and diaphragm" is listed as sub-items in the subchapter to “measure the quadriceps section”. It is better to divide all descriptions to subchapters. The information from “muscle thickness” subsection in the methodology seem to be redundant.

The changes shall be done as instructed.

The introduction and discussion contains interesting information, but it is good to confirm it with a citation. The information then looks more reliable,

Definitely we’ll work on that.

. "Anecdotal evidence" that are not scientifically proven should not be described, e.g.:

“Though anecdotal evidence claims a bidirectional relationship between physical inactivity and peripheral muscle strength or thickness, observational studies establishing the relationship are lacking.” (introduction)
If research has been done on this subject but not published, it is worth mentioning it. If not, it may be better to add this kind of suggestion in the discussion (if needed).

Sure will do the changes.

In the flow diagram, the initial number of participants was 91, which is the same as the final number. Is it the same number for sure? Below "patients screened", "bedridden patients not screened for the study" is mentioned. This suggests that some people were excluded for this reason. However, the number of people excluded from the study for this reason was not reported. I think that in the flow chart it is worth specifying the initial number of people at the top. Then, the number of those excluded due to the exclusion criterion (as listed in the methodology: recent trauma, orthopedic interventions, bedridden, paralyzed, osteoarthritis, and other chronic diseases of the heart and lung).

Yes we screened 91 excluding the bed ridden patients and the procedure was focused on these patients. But I shall add the initial number in the beginning .

English in some places need improvement, e.g.

“The study included 91 patients aged 18 to 35 years with N = 78 male subjects with mean age and standard deviation of 27.954 years 4.67 and N = 13 females with mean age and standard deviation of 27.978 years 4.67.” (results)

“According to previoys studies, men’s skeletal muscle degradation is correlated with age at about 27 years of age. With this clause, we have restricted our study age group to between 18-35 years.” (discussion)

The study comprised 91 individuals between the ages of 18 and 35. There were 78 male subjects (mean age, standard deviation, 27.954 years) and 13 female subjects (mean age, standard deviation, 27.978 years).
Previous research has shown that men's skeletal muscle deterioration starts to increase at the age of 27. This provision limits the study age range to those between the ages of 18 and 35.

Secondly, I don't see the purpose of providing employment information. Maybe it would be a good idea if the results were divided into two groups to show different correlations between employed and unemployed people. In the context of this work, perhaps a better question would be: Does the daily work performed by the participants involve physical or office work?

The occupation data was only collected to have a brief understanding about patient’s PA and sedentary lifestyle.

Some of the sentences in the article are incorrect or stylistically/grammatically wrong which sometimes makes them seem unclear e.g.

“Out of 91 patients, 30 were found to regularly smoke, and six had drinking habits after questions regarding lifestyle characteristics including smoking and drinking were asked.” (results)

“This increase in diaphragm thickness may result in increased inspiratory muscle efficiency or improved pulmonary mechanics, or both.” (discussion)

“Recent studies have shown and proved that diaphragm muscle thickness changes with increased PA, e.g. weight training.” (discussion)

Corrections :

In responses to inquiries on lifestyle factors including drinking and smoking, it was discovered that 30 of the 91 patients smoked frequently and 6 had drinking habits. (results)

The rise in diaphragm thickness might lead to improved pulmonary mechanics, enhanced inspiratory muscle efficiency, or even both. (discussion)

"Recent research has shown that diaphragm thickness changes with increased PA, such as weight training." (discussion)
We are grateful for the comments and suggestions provided. we have tried to incorporate the changes and justified the same.

Inaccurate information in methodology.

Not clear breathing manoeuvre during the diaphragm measurement: In the first sentence diaphragm thickness was measured at the end-expiration and in peak inspiration. In the second sentence diaphragm thickness was measured before normal inhalation and after complete exhalation. It is not clear which information is true.

the diaphragmatic thickness was determined as the distance between the diaphragmatic pleura and the peritoneum at end-expiration (Tdi,ee) and peak inspiration (Tdi,pi). To be more specific we have mentioned as before normal inspiration.

Was the only one value collected from each photo? It would be better to describe it in the methodology section.

Yes only one value was measured – inspiration and expiration values.

“The chest wall was aligned perpendicularly with a 13-MHz linear array transducer.” Is the diaphragm definitely measured by a linear probe?

Yes a high frequency linear probe is used for better resolution and a wide field of view.

Moreover, it would be appropriate to add information about the subjects' BMI.

Unfortunately we haven’t collected the body mass index data .

The results include information about smoking and drinking alcohol. The method lacks information on how the data was collected.

The data was collected while the patient had to fill out the questionnaire.

To measure the quadriceps” section is described in the subchapter. "To measure the soleus and diaphragm" is listed as sub-items in the subchapter to “measure the quadriceps section”. It is better to divide all descriptions to subchapters. The information from “muscle thickness” subsection in the methodology seem to be redundant.

The changes shall be done as instructed.

The introduction and discussion contains interesting information, but it is good to confirm it with a citation. The information then looks more reliable,

Definitely we’ll work on that.

. "Anecdotal evidence" that are not scientifically proven should not be described, e.g.:

“Though anecdotal evidence claims a bidirectional relationship between physical inactivity and peripheral muscle strength or thickness, observational studies establishing the relationship are lacking.” (introduction)
If research has been done on this subject but not published, it is worth mentioning it. If not, it may be better to add this kind of suggestion in the discussion (if needed).

Sure will do the changes.

In the flow diagram, the initial number of participants was 91, which is the same as the final number. Is it the same number for sure? Below "patients screened", "bedridden patients not screened for the study" is mentioned. This suggests that some people were excluded for this reason. However, the number of people excluded from the study for this reason was not reported. I think that in the flow chart it is worth specifying the initial number of people at the top. Then, the number of those excluded due to the exclusion criterion (as listed in the methodology: recent trauma, orthopedic interventions, bedridden, paralyzed, osteoarthritis, and other chronic diseases of the heart and lung).

Yes we screened 91 excluding the bed ridden patients and the procedure was focused on these patients. But I shall add the initial number in the beginning .

English in some places need improvement, e.g.

“The study included 91 patients aged 18 to 35 years with N = 78 male subjects with mean age and standard deviation of 27.954 years 4.67 and N = 13 females with mean age and standard deviation of 27.978 years 4.67.” (results)

“According to previoys studies, men’s skeletal muscle degradation is correlated with age at about 27 years of age. With this clause, we have restricted our study age group to between 18-35 years.” (discussion)

The study comprised 91 individuals between the ages of 18 and 35. There were 78 male subjects (mean age, standard deviation, 27.954 years) and 13 female subjects (mean age, standard deviation, 27.978 years).
Previous research has shown that men's skeletal muscle deterioration starts to increase at the age of 27. This provision limits the study age range to those between the ages of 18 and 35.

Secondly, I don't see the purpose of providing employment information. Maybe it would be a good idea if the results were divided into two groups to show different correlations between employed and unemployed people. In the context of this work, perhaps a better question would be: Does the daily work performed by the participants involve physical or office work?

The occupation data was only collected to have a brief understanding about patient’s PA and sedentary lifestyle.

Some of the sentences in the article are incorrect or stylistically/grammatically wrong which sometimes makes them seem unclear e.g.

“Out of 91 patients, 30 were found to regularly smoke, and six had drinking habits after questions regarding lifestyle characteristics including smoking and drinking were asked.” (results)

“This increase in diaphragm thickness may result in increased inspiratory muscle efficiency or improved pulmonary mechanics, or both.” (discussion)

“Recent studies have shown and proved that diaphragm muscle thickness changes with increased PA, e.g. weight training.” (discussion)

Corrections :

In responses to inquiries on lifestyle factors including drinking and smoking, it was discovered that 30 of the 91 patients smoked frequently and 6 had drinking habits. (results)

The rise in diaphragm thickness might lead to improved pulmonary mechanics, enhanced inspiratory muscle efficiency, or even both. (discussion)

"Recent research has shown that diaphragm thickness changes with increased PA, such as weight training." (discussion)
Competing Interests: All the authors have declared no competing interests. Close
Report a concern
Respond or Comment

COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT

Author Response 06 Oct 2023

suresh sukumar , Department of Medical Imaging Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India

06 Oct 2023

Author Response
We are grateful for the comments and suggestions provided. we have tried to incorporate the changes and justified the same.
1. Inaccurate information in methodology.
... Continue reading
We are grateful for the comments and suggestions provided. we have tried to incorporate the changes and justified the same.

Inaccurate information in methodology.

Not clear breathing manoeuvre during the diaphragm measurement: In the first sentence diaphragm thickness was measured at the end-expiration and in peak inspiration. In the second sentence diaphragm thickness was measured before normal inhalation and after complete exhalation. It is not clear which information is true.

the diaphragmatic thickness was determined as the distance between the diaphragmatic pleura and the peritoneum at end-expiration (Tdi,ee) and peak inspiration (Tdi,pi). To be more specific we have mentioned as before normal inspiration.

Was the only one value collected from each photo? It would be better to describe it in the methodology section.

Yes only one value was measured – inspiration and expiration values.

“The chest wall was aligned perpendicularly with a 13-MHz linear array transducer.” Is the diaphragm definitely measured by a linear probe?

Yes a high frequency linear probe is used for better resolution and a wide field of view.

Moreover, it would be appropriate to add information about the subjects' BMI.

Unfortunately we haven’t collected the body mass index data .

The results include information about smoking and drinking alcohol. The method lacks information on how the data was collected.

The data was collected while the patient had to fill out the questionnaire.

To measure the quadriceps” section is described in the subchapter. "To measure the soleus and diaphragm" is listed as sub-items in the subchapter to “measure the quadriceps section”. It is better to divide all descriptions to subchapters. The information from “muscle thickness” subsection in the methodology seem to be redundant.

The changes shall be done as instructed.

The introduction and discussion contains interesting information, but it is good to confirm it with a citation. The information then looks more reliable,

Definitely we’ll work on that.

. "Anecdotal evidence" that are not scientifically proven should not be described, e.g.:

“Though anecdotal evidence claims a bidirectional relationship between physical inactivity and peripheral muscle strength or thickness, observational studies establishing the relationship are lacking.” (introduction)
If research has been done on this subject but not published, it is worth mentioning it. If not, it may be better to add this kind of suggestion in the discussion (if needed).

Sure will do the changes.

In the flow diagram, the initial number of participants was 91, which is the same as the final number. Is it the same number for sure? Below "patients screened", "bedridden patients not screened for the study" is mentioned. This suggests that some people were excluded for this reason. However, the number of people excluded from the study for this reason was not reported. I think that in the flow chart it is worth specifying the initial number of people at the top. Then, the number of those excluded due to the exclusion criterion (as listed in the methodology: recent trauma, orthopedic interventions, bedridden, paralyzed, osteoarthritis, and other chronic diseases of the heart and lung).

Yes we screened 91 excluding the bed ridden patients and the procedure was focused on these patients. But I shall add the initial number in the beginning .

English in some places need improvement, e.g.

“The study included 91 patients aged 18 to 35 years with N = 78 male subjects with mean age and standard deviation of 27.954 years 4.67 and N = 13 females with mean age and standard deviation of 27.978 years 4.67.” (results)

“According to previoys studies, men’s skeletal muscle degradation is correlated with age at about 27 years of age. With this clause, we have restricted our study age group to between 18-35 years.” (discussion)

The study comprised 91 individuals between the ages of 18 and 35. There were 78 male subjects (mean age, standard deviation, 27.954 years) and 13 female subjects (mean age, standard deviation, 27.978 years).
Previous research has shown that men's skeletal muscle deterioration starts to increase at the age of 27. This provision limits the study age range to those between the ages of 18 and 35.

Secondly, I don't see the purpose of providing employment information. Maybe it would be a good idea if the results were divided into two groups to show different correlations between employed and unemployed people. In the context of this work, perhaps a better question would be: Does the daily work performed by the participants involve physical or office work?

The occupation data was only collected to have a brief understanding about patient’s PA and sedentary lifestyle.

Some of the sentences in the article are incorrect or stylistically/grammatically wrong which sometimes makes them seem unclear e.g.

“Out of 91 patients, 30 were found to regularly smoke, and six had drinking habits after questions regarding lifestyle characteristics including smoking and drinking were asked.” (results)

“This increase in diaphragm thickness may result in increased inspiratory muscle efficiency or improved pulmonary mechanics, or both.” (discussion)

“Recent studies have shown and proved that diaphragm muscle thickness changes with increased PA, e.g. weight training.” (discussion)

Corrections :

In responses to inquiries on lifestyle factors including drinking and smoking, it was discovered that 30 of the 91 patients smoked frequently and 6 had drinking habits. (results)

The rise in diaphragm thickness might lead to improved pulmonary mechanics, enhanced inspiratory muscle efficiency, or even both. (discussion)

"Recent research has shown that diaphragm thickness changes with increased PA, such as weight training." (discussion)
We are grateful for the comments and suggestions provided. we have tried to incorporate the changes and justified the same.

Inaccurate information in methodology.

Not clear breathing manoeuvre during the diaphragm measurement: In the first sentence diaphragm thickness was measured at the end-expiration and in peak inspiration. In the second sentence diaphragm thickness was measured before normal inhalation and after complete exhalation. It is not clear which information is true.

the diaphragmatic thickness was determined as the distance between the diaphragmatic pleura and the peritoneum at end-expiration (Tdi,ee) and peak inspiration (Tdi,pi). To be more specific we have mentioned as before normal inspiration.

Was the only one value collected from each photo? It would be better to describe it in the methodology section.

Yes only one value was measured – inspiration and expiration values.

“The chest wall was aligned perpendicularly with a 13-MHz linear array transducer.” Is the diaphragm definitely measured by a linear probe?

Yes a high frequency linear probe is used for better resolution and a wide field of view.

Moreover, it would be appropriate to add information about the subjects' BMI.

Unfortunately we haven’t collected the body mass index data .

The results include information about smoking and drinking alcohol. The method lacks information on how the data was collected.

The data was collected while the patient had to fill out the questionnaire.

To measure the quadriceps” section is described in the subchapter. "To measure the soleus and diaphragm" is listed as sub-items in the subchapter to “measure the quadriceps section”. It is better to divide all descriptions to subchapters. The information from “muscle thickness” subsection in the methodology seem to be redundant.

The changes shall be done as instructed.

The introduction and discussion contains interesting information, but it is good to confirm it with a citation. The information then looks more reliable,

Definitely we’ll work on that.

. "Anecdotal evidence" that are not scientifically proven should not be described, e.g.:

“Though anecdotal evidence claims a bidirectional relationship between physical inactivity and peripheral muscle strength or thickness, observational studies establishing the relationship are lacking.” (introduction)
If research has been done on this subject but not published, it is worth mentioning it. If not, it may be better to add this kind of suggestion in the discussion (if needed).

Sure will do the changes.

In the flow diagram, the initial number of participants was 91, which is the same as the final number. Is it the same number for sure? Below "patients screened", "bedridden patients not screened for the study" is mentioned. This suggests that some people were excluded for this reason. However, the number of people excluded from the study for this reason was not reported. I think that in the flow chart it is worth specifying the initial number of people at the top. Then, the number of those excluded due to the exclusion criterion (as listed in the methodology: recent trauma, orthopedic interventions, bedridden, paralyzed, osteoarthritis, and other chronic diseases of the heart and lung).

Yes we screened 91 excluding the bed ridden patients and the procedure was focused on these patients. But I shall add the initial number in the beginning .

English in some places need improvement, e.g.

“The study included 91 patients aged 18 to 35 years with N = 78 male subjects with mean age and standard deviation of 27.954 years 4.67 and N = 13 females with mean age and standard deviation of 27.978 years 4.67.” (results)

“According to previoys studies, men’s skeletal muscle degradation is correlated with age at about 27 years of age. With this clause, we have restricted our study age group to between 18-35 years.” (discussion)

The study comprised 91 individuals between the ages of 18 and 35. There were 78 male subjects (mean age, standard deviation, 27.954 years) and 13 female subjects (mean age, standard deviation, 27.978 years).
Previous research has shown that men's skeletal muscle deterioration starts to increase at the age of 27. This provision limits the study age range to those between the ages of 18 and 35.

Secondly, I don't see the purpose of providing employment information. Maybe it would be a good idea if the results were divided into two groups to show different correlations between employed and unemployed people. In the context of this work, perhaps a better question would be: Does the daily work performed by the participants involve physical or office work?

The occupation data was only collected to have a brief understanding about patient’s PA and sedentary lifestyle.

Some of the sentences in the article are incorrect or stylistically/grammatically wrong which sometimes makes them seem unclear e.g.

“Out of 91 patients, 30 were found to regularly smoke, and six had drinking habits after questions regarding lifestyle characteristics including smoking and drinking were asked.” (results)

“This increase in diaphragm thickness may result in increased inspiratory muscle efficiency or improved pulmonary mechanics, or both.” (discussion)

“Recent studies have shown and proved that diaphragm muscle thickness changes with increased PA, e.g. weight training.” (discussion)

Corrections :

In responses to inquiries on lifestyle factors including drinking and smoking, it was discovered that 30 of the 91 patients smoked frequently and 6 had drinking habits. (results)

The rise in diaphragm thickness might lead to improved pulmonary mechanics, enhanced inspiratory muscle efficiency, or even both. (discussion)

"Recent research has shown that diaphragm thickness changes with increased PA, such as weight training." (discussion)
Competing Interests: All the authors have declared no competing interests. Close
Report a concern

Views

Reviewer Report 25 Aug 2023

Ranganath Gangavelli, GITAM School of Physiotherapy, Gandhi Institute of Technology and Management (GITAM), Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India

Not Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.148494.r188229

I appreciate the author's efforts in conducting this study. It is interesting to study the impact of physical activity and its impact on muscle thickness. The Introduction is well structured. However, there are a few aspects that need serious consideration. ... Continue reading

The study is reported as a cross-sectional design in the Abstract. However, in the Methods section of the Manuscript, it is mentioned as a randomized crossover design approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. Further, the trial was registered as an interventional study in CTRI. Please justify the discrepancy. However, no medical/ therapeutic intervention was reported in the manuscript except for diagnostic investigation.
The hypothesis statement is not clear. The muscle Strength measures are never reported in the manuscript. Are the thickness measures equated to strength? The word "change" is confusing. Are the authors measuring the change in this study? Which of the three designs mentioned earlier is adopted in the study and is used to test the hypothesis? Or is it a cohort study to determine the "change" in the thickness of muscles as age progresses in an individual, as stated in the 2nd hypothesis? However, only a single timepoint for thickness measure was reported in the manuscript.
Regarding participants: Please justify the reason for recruiting the Patients while the data could be collected from asymptomatic volunteers with self-reported physical activity levels. Could the underlying health condition (not stated in the manuscript) influence the data? Details/reports of provisional or final diagnoses will help interpret the data.
The procedure is expressed in the future tense.
The ankle's position while measuring the soleus's thickness is repetitive.
Please justify obtaining the data on smoking and alcohol use. It is not discussed.
The expression of the result is inconsistent.
The reported diaphragm thickness is quite less than earlier reports ¹. Please discuss the reasons for the difference in recording. The population seems to be the same.
Grammar and spelling checks are required in the Results and Discussion sections.
Body Mass Index, along with Physical activity level, may have an impact on the thickness measures. Please report if the data is available.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

References

1. Dhungana A, Khilnani G, Hadda V, Guleria R: Reproducibility of diaphragm thickness measurements by ultrasonography in patients on mechanical ventilation.World J Crit Care Med. 2017; 6 (4): 185-189 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Musculoskeletal Health, Mobilization, Pain.

CITE

Report a concern

Author Response 06 Oct 2023

suresh sukumar , Department of Medical Imaging Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India

06 Oct 2023

Author Response
We are grateful for the comments and suggestions.We have tried to incorporate the changes and have justified for the same.
1. The study is reported as a cross-sectional design
... Continue reading
We are grateful for the comments and suggestions.We have tried to incorporate the changes and have justified for the same.

The study is reported as a cross-sectional design in the Abstract. However, in the Methods section of the Manuscript, it is mentioned as a randomized crossover design approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. Further, the trial was registered as an interventional study in CTRI. Please justify the discrepancy. However, no medical/ therapeutic intervention was reported in the manuscript except for diagnostic investigation.

The study is an observational study to see the changes within the muscles with respect to physical activity. Since the study includes various procedures and activity we have mentioned it as interventional study. Furthermore the RCT design changes shall be made.

The hypothesis statement is not clear. The muscle Strength measures are never reported in the manuscript. Are the thickness measures equated to strength? The word "change" is confusing. Are the authors measuring the change in this study? Which of the three designs mentioned earlier is adopted in the study and is used to test the hypothesis? Or is it a cohort study to determine the "change" in the thickness of muscles as age progresses in an individual, as stated in the 2nd hypothesis? However, only a single timepoint for thickness measure was reported in the manuscript.

The muscle strength measurements are not mentioned here but instead we have measured the thickness. Also Muscle strength depends on muscle quality as well as muscle quantity (e.g. muscle volume including muscle thickness).

To simplify the word change here we have measured the muscle thickness of a physically active individual and sedentary lifestyle individual to see the changes in the muscle thickness with respect to physical activity.

It’s a combination of cross sectional and interventional study since we have taken a period of 7 days for the measurement of muscle which would be considered a short span of time to be determined as cohort study.

Regarding participants: Please justify the reason for recruiting the Patients while the data could be collected from asymptomatic volunteers with self-reported physical activity levels. Could the underlying health condition (not stated in the manuscript) influence the data? Details/reports of provisional or final diagnoses will help interpret the data.

We have chosen the patients from the KMC hospital as it was more feasible to collect data from them. Also after screening the patient we have excluded patients with recent trauma, orthopedic interventions, bedridden, paralyzed, osteoarthritis, and other chronic diseases of the heart and lungs which can hamper the muscle thickness.

The procedure is expressed in the future tense.

Apologies for the inconvenience. Corrections shall be done.

The ankle's position while measuring the soleus's thickness is repetitive

Corrections shall be done.

Please justify obtaining the data on smoking and alcohol use. It is not discussed.

The motive of obtaining the smoking and alcohol consumption details was basically to see if it hampers the change in the muscle thickness of an individual.

The expression of the result is inconsistent.

We shall work on that and improvise it.

The reported diaphragm thickness is quite less than earlier reports ¹. Please discuss the reasons for the difference in recording. The population seems to be the same

The measurement may vary with patients, the inspiration and expiration rate may change too since it’s a self- reported study minor differences can occur.

Grammar and spelling checks are required in the Results and Discussion sections.

Definitely changes will be made.

Body Mass Index, along with Physical activity level, may have an impact on the thickness measures. Please report if the data is available.

Unfortunately we haven’t taken the body mass index data with PA.
We are grateful for the comments and suggestions.We have tried to incorporate the changes and have justified for the same.

The study is reported as a cross-sectional design in the Abstract. However, in the Methods section of the Manuscript, it is mentioned as a randomized crossover design approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. Further, the trial was registered as an interventional study in CTRI. Please justify the discrepancy. However, no medical/ therapeutic intervention was reported in the manuscript except for diagnostic investigation.

The study is an observational study to see the changes within the muscles with respect to physical activity. Since the study includes various procedures and activity we have mentioned it as interventional study. Furthermore the RCT design changes shall be made.

The hypothesis statement is not clear. The muscle Strength measures are never reported in the manuscript. Are the thickness measures equated to strength? The word "change" is confusing. Are the authors measuring the change in this study? Which of the three designs mentioned earlier is adopted in the study and is used to test the hypothesis? Or is it a cohort study to determine the "change" in the thickness of muscles as age progresses in an individual, as stated in the 2nd hypothesis? However, only a single timepoint for thickness measure was reported in the manuscript.

The muscle strength measurements are not mentioned here but instead we have measured the thickness. Also Muscle strength depends on muscle quality as well as muscle quantity (e.g. muscle volume including muscle thickness).

To simplify the word change here we have measured the muscle thickness of a physically active individual and sedentary lifestyle individual to see the changes in the muscle thickness with respect to physical activity.

It’s a combination of cross sectional and interventional study since we have taken a period of 7 days for the measurement of muscle which would be considered a short span of time to be determined as cohort study.

Regarding participants: Please justify the reason for recruiting the Patients while the data could be collected from asymptomatic volunteers with self-reported physical activity levels. Could the underlying health condition (not stated in the manuscript) influence the data? Details/reports of provisional or final diagnoses will help interpret the data.

We have chosen the patients from the KMC hospital as it was more feasible to collect data from them. Also after screening the patient we have excluded patients with recent trauma, orthopedic interventions, bedridden, paralyzed, osteoarthritis, and other chronic diseases of the heart and lungs which can hamper the muscle thickness.

The procedure is expressed in the future tense.

Apologies for the inconvenience. Corrections shall be done.

The ankle's position while measuring the soleus's thickness is repetitive

Corrections shall be done.

Please justify obtaining the data on smoking and alcohol use. It is not discussed.

The motive of obtaining the smoking and alcohol consumption details was basically to see if it hampers the change in the muscle thickness of an individual.

The expression of the result is inconsistent.

We shall work on that and improvise it.

The reported diaphragm thickness is quite less than earlier reports ¹. Please discuss the reasons for the difference in recording. The population seems to be the same

The measurement may vary with patients, the inspiration and expiration rate may change too since it’s a self- reported study minor differences can occur.

Grammar and spelling checks are required in the Results and Discussion sections.

Definitely changes will be made.

Body Mass Index, along with Physical activity level, may have an impact on the thickness measures. Please report if the data is available.

Unfortunately we haven’t taken the body mass index data with PA.
Competing Interests: all the authors declare no competing interests Close
Report a concern
Respond or Comment

COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT

Author Response 06 Oct 2023

suresh sukumar , Department of Medical Imaging Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India

06 Oct 2023

Author Response
We are grateful for the comments and suggestions.We have tried to incorporate the changes and have justified for the same.
1. The study is reported as a cross-sectional design
... Continue reading
We are grateful for the comments and suggestions.We have tried to incorporate the changes and have justified for the same.

The study is reported as a cross-sectional design in the Abstract. However, in the Methods section of the Manuscript, it is mentioned as a randomized crossover design approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. Further, the trial was registered as an interventional study in CTRI. Please justify the discrepancy. However, no medical/ therapeutic intervention was reported in the manuscript except for diagnostic investigation.

The study is an observational study to see the changes within the muscles with respect to physical activity. Since the study includes various procedures and activity we have mentioned it as interventional study. Furthermore the RCT design changes shall be made.

The hypothesis statement is not clear. The muscle Strength measures are never reported in the manuscript. Are the thickness measures equated to strength? The word "change" is confusing. Are the authors measuring the change in this study? Which of the three designs mentioned earlier is adopted in the study and is used to test the hypothesis? Or is it a cohort study to determine the "change" in the thickness of muscles as age progresses in an individual, as stated in the 2nd hypothesis? However, only a single timepoint for thickness measure was reported in the manuscript.

The muscle strength measurements are not mentioned here but instead we have measured the thickness. Also Muscle strength depends on muscle quality as well as muscle quantity (e.g. muscle volume including muscle thickness).

To simplify the word change here we have measured the muscle thickness of a physically active individual and sedentary lifestyle individual to see the changes in the muscle thickness with respect to physical activity.

It’s a combination of cross sectional and interventional study since we have taken a period of 7 days for the measurement of muscle which would be considered a short span of time to be determined as cohort study.

Regarding participants: Please justify the reason for recruiting the Patients while the data could be collected from asymptomatic volunteers with self-reported physical activity levels. Could the underlying health condition (not stated in the manuscript) influence the data? Details/reports of provisional or final diagnoses will help interpret the data.

We have chosen the patients from the KMC hospital as it was more feasible to collect data from them. Also after screening the patient we have excluded patients with recent trauma, orthopedic interventions, bedridden, paralyzed, osteoarthritis, and other chronic diseases of the heart and lungs which can hamper the muscle thickness.

The procedure is expressed in the future tense.

Apologies for the inconvenience. Corrections shall be done.

The ankle's position while measuring the soleus's thickness is repetitive

Corrections shall be done.

Please justify obtaining the data on smoking and alcohol use. It is not discussed.

The motive of obtaining the smoking and alcohol consumption details was basically to see if it hampers the change in the muscle thickness of an individual.

The expression of the result is inconsistent.

We shall work on that and improvise it.

The reported diaphragm thickness is quite less than earlier reports ¹. Please discuss the reasons for the difference in recording. The population seems to be the same

The measurement may vary with patients, the inspiration and expiration rate may change too since it’s a self- reported study minor differences can occur.

Grammar and spelling checks are required in the Results and Discussion sections.

Definitely changes will be made.

Body Mass Index, along with Physical activity level, may have an impact on the thickness measures. Please report if the data is available.

Unfortunately we haven’t taken the body mass index data with PA.
We are grateful for the comments and suggestions.We have tried to incorporate the changes and have justified for the same.

The study is reported as a cross-sectional design in the Abstract. However, in the Methods section of the Manuscript, it is mentioned as a randomized crossover design approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. Further, the trial was registered as an interventional study in CTRI. Please justify the discrepancy. However, no medical/ therapeutic intervention was reported in the manuscript except for diagnostic investigation.

The study is an observational study to see the changes within the muscles with respect to physical activity. Since the study includes various procedures and activity we have mentioned it as interventional study. Furthermore the RCT design changes shall be made.

The hypothesis statement is not clear. The muscle Strength measures are never reported in the manuscript. Are the thickness measures equated to strength? The word "change" is confusing. Are the authors measuring the change in this study? Which of the three designs mentioned earlier is adopted in the study and is used to test the hypothesis? Or is it a cohort study to determine the "change" in the thickness of muscles as age progresses in an individual, as stated in the 2nd hypothesis? However, only a single timepoint for thickness measure was reported in the manuscript.

The muscle strength measurements are not mentioned here but instead we have measured the thickness. Also Muscle strength depends on muscle quality as well as muscle quantity (e.g. muscle volume including muscle thickness).

To simplify the word change here we have measured the muscle thickness of a physically active individual and sedentary lifestyle individual to see the changes in the muscle thickness with respect to physical activity.

It’s a combination of cross sectional and interventional study since we have taken a period of 7 days for the measurement of muscle which would be considered a short span of time to be determined as cohort study.

Regarding participants: Please justify the reason for recruiting the Patients while the data could be collected from asymptomatic volunteers with self-reported physical activity levels. Could the underlying health condition (not stated in the manuscript) influence the data? Details/reports of provisional or final diagnoses will help interpret the data.

We have chosen the patients from the KMC hospital as it was more feasible to collect data from them. Also after screening the patient we have excluded patients with recent trauma, orthopedic interventions, bedridden, paralyzed, osteoarthritis, and other chronic diseases of the heart and lungs which can hamper the muscle thickness.

The procedure is expressed in the future tense.

Apologies for the inconvenience. Corrections shall be done.

The ankle's position while measuring the soleus's thickness is repetitive

Corrections shall be done.

Please justify obtaining the data on smoking and alcohol use. It is not discussed.

The motive of obtaining the smoking and alcohol consumption details was basically to see if it hampers the change in the muscle thickness of an individual.

The expression of the result is inconsistent.

We shall work on that and improvise it.

The reported diaphragm thickness is quite less than earlier reports ¹. Please discuss the reasons for the difference in recording. The population seems to be the same

The measurement may vary with patients, the inspiration and expiration rate may change too since it’s a self- reported study minor differences can occur.

Grammar and spelling checks are required in the Results and Discussion sections.

Definitely changes will be made.

Body Mass Index, along with Physical activity level, may have an impact on the thickness measures. Please report if the data is available.

Unfortunately we haven’t taken the body mass index data with PA.
Competing Interests: all the authors declare no competing interests Close
Report a concern

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2

VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 17 Jul 2023

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

	Invited Reviewers
	1	2	3	4	5
Version 2 (revision) 29 Sep 23			read	read	read
Version 1 17 Jul 23	read	read

Ranganath Gangavelli, Gandhi Institute of Technology and Management (GITAM), Visakhapatnam, India
Małgorzata Pałac, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education, Katowice, Poland
Suruliraj Karthikbabu, Dr NGP Research and Educational Trust, Coimbatore, India
Dustin J Oranchuk, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, USA
Ramprasad Muthukrishnan, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates

Renuka M, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates

Comments on this article

All Comments(0)

Add a comment

Browse by related subjects

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

5 Views

04 Sep 2024 | for Version 2

Ramprasad Muthukrishnan, Department of Physiotherapy, College of Health Science, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates

Renuka M, Physiotherpy, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates

5 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved With Reservations

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

I cannot comment. A qualified statistician is required.
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Back pain and motor control exercises, Neural correlates and executive functions, manual therapy

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

8 Views

10 May 2024 | for Version 2

Dustin J Oranchuk, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA

8 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Not Approved

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

No
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

No
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

No
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Muscle morphology, physical performance, healthy ageing, strength and conditioning.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

27 Views

10 Oct 2023 | for Version 2

Suruliraj Karthikbabu, KMCH College of Physiotherapy, Dr NGP Research and Educational Trust, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

27 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved With Reservations

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

34 Views

30 Aug 2023 | for Version 1

Małgorzata Pałac, Musculoskeletal Elastography and Ultrasonography Laboratory, Institute of Physiotherapy and Health Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education, Katowice, Poland

34 Views Cite this report Responses(1)

Not Approved

Not clear breathing maneuver during the diaphragm measurement:

Secondly, no information was provided about where exactly the thickness measurements were taken from the images of muscles. This is not clear in Fig. 2.
Was the only one value collected from each photo? It would be better to describe it in the methodology section.
“The chest wall was aligned perpendicularly with a 13-MHz linear array transducer.” Is the diaphragm definitely measured by a linear probe?
Moreover, it would be appropriate to add information about the subjects' BMI.
The results include information about smoking and drinking alcohol. The method lacks information on how the data was collected.
Incorporating the interpretation of correlation results into the methodology and subsequently discussing them in the results and discussion sections is valuable. This approach contributes to a more accurate and insightful analysis of the results.
“To measure the quadriceps” section is described in the subchapter. "To measure the soleus and diaphragm" is listed as sub-items in the subchapter to “measure the quadriceps section”. It is better to divide all descriptions to subchapters. The information from “muscle thickness” subsection in the methodology seem to be redundant.

“Muscle mass and strength are predictors of performance enhancement and ability to work in adults and mobility functions in the elderly population.” (introduction)
“Furthermore, peripheral muscle mass and strength are associated with chronic diseases like sarcopenia which is a major risk and early mortality”. (introduction)
“The reason for selecting the quadriceps, soleus in the lower limb, and the diaphragm for the study were that many researchers have found that there is a change in muscle thickness as age progresses, and it differs with sex as well.” (discussion) The sentence seems intended to explain why these particular muscles were selected for analysis. If that was the aim, what is missing is the citation indicating that these particular muscles change in thickness with age.

“The study included 91 patients aged 18 to 35 years with N = 78 male subjects with mean age and standard deviation of 27.954 years 4.67 and N = 13 females with mean age and standard deviation of 27.978 years 4.67.” (results)
“According to previoys studies, men’s skeletal muscle degradation is correlated with age at about 27 years of age. With this clause, we have restricted our study age group to between 18-35 years.” (discussion)

In these sentences authors should choose “age” or “years”.

Additionally, if a standard deviation is given for the age, it is sufficient for the average number of ages to be rounded to the nearest whole number (maximum of one decimal place). It looks more readable.
Moreover, in some sentences it says the "diaphragm thickness", in others the "diaphragm muscle thickness" (discussion). The diaphragm thickness is sufficient.

The number and age of participants are repeated twice in the results section (3 lines apart).

To simplify and not repeat the information, the first sentences from the results section can be placed in the baseline characteristic section.

Secondly, I don't see the purpose of providing employment information. Maybe it would be a good idea if the results were divided into two groups to show different correlations between employed and unemployed people. In the context of this work, perhaps a better question would be: Does the daily work performed by the participants involve physical or office work?
Thirdly, results given in the table are repeated in the text. This is not advisable. Moreover, several results from the text do not coincide with the results from the tables.

11. Table 1 needs improvement.

I would suggest changing the title of the table, e.g. Patients characteristics.
Also, remove the occupation information.
Some values are given to a whole number, some to 1 decimal place, some to 2 decimal places, others with 3 decimal places. This should be standardized.
There is a lack of explanation of abbreviations in the tables. Some of them are explained in the text it would be clearer to the reader if they were also placed below the table (the same as MET was explained).

12. Some of the sentences in the article are incorrect or stylistically/grammatically wrong which sometimes makes them seem unclear e.g.

“Out of 91 patients, 30 were found to regularly smoke, and six had drinking habits after questions regarding lifestyle characteristics including smoking and drinking were asked.” (results)
“This increase in diaphragm thickness may result in increased inspiratory muscle efficiency or improved pulmonary mechanics, or both.” (discussion)
“Recent studies have shown and proved that diaphragm muscle thickness changes with increased PA, e.g. weight training.” (discussion)

Just use one shown or proved.

“We required 91 samples to achieve a moderate correlation (r1 > 0.4) at an alpha level of 95% and an 80% strength.”

Is it certain that the version "rl" is the correct one?

“With all these factors as constants and variables, our study shows that with an increase in PA, there is a significant increase in the quadriceps (…).” (discussion)

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Respiratory muscle ultrasonography, Physiotherapy, Shear wave elastography

Respond to this report

Responses (1)

Author Response

06 Oct 2023

suresh sukumar , Department of Medical Imaging Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India

We are grateful for the comments and suggestions provided. we have tried to incorporate the changes and justified the same.

Inaccurate information in methodology.

Not clear breathing manoeuvre during the diaphragm measurement: In the first sentence diaphragm thickness was measured at the end-expiration and in peak inspiration. In the second sentence diaphragm thickness was measured before normal inhalation and after complete exhalation. It is not clear which information is true.

the diaphragmatic thickness was determined as the distance between the diaphragmatic pleura and the peritoneum at end-expiration (Tdi,ee) and peak inspiration (Tdi,pi). To be more specific we have mentioned as before normal inspiration.

Was the only one value collected from each photo? It would be better to describe it in the methodology section.

Yes only one value was measured – inspiration and expiration values.

“The chest wall was aligned perpendicularly with a 13-MHz linear array transducer.” Is the diaphragm definitely measured by a linear probe?

Yes a high frequency linear probe is used for better resolution and a wide field of view.

Moreover, it would be appropriate to add information about the subjects' BMI.

Unfortunately we haven’t collected the body mass index data .

The results include information about smoking and drinking alcohol. The method lacks information on how the data was collected.

The data was collected while the patient had to fill out the questionnaire.

To measure the quadriceps” section is described in the subchapter. "To measure the soleus and diaphragm" is listed as sub-items in the subchapter to “measure the quadriceps section”. It is better to divide all descriptions to subchapters. The information from “muscle thickness” subsection in the methodology seem to be redundant.

The changes shall be done as instructed.

The introduction and discussion contains interesting information, but it is good to confirm it with a citation. The information then looks more reliable,

Definitely we’ll work on that.

. "Anecdotal evidence" that are not scientifically proven should not be described, e.g.:

“Though anecdotal evidence claims a bidirectional relationship between physical inactivity and peripheral muscle strength or thickness, observational studies establishing the relationship are lacking.” (introduction)
If research has been done on this subject but not published, it is worth mentioning it. If not, it may be better to add this kind of suggestion in the discussion (if needed).

Sure will do the changes.

In the flow diagram, the initial number of participants was 91, which is the same as the final number. Is it the same number for sure? Below "patients screened", "bedridden patients not screened for the study" is mentioned. This suggests that some people were excluded for this reason. However, the number of people excluded from the study for this reason was not reported. I think that in the flow chart it is worth specifying the initial number of people at the top. Then, the number of those excluded due to the exclusion criterion (as listed in the methodology: recent trauma, orthopedic interventions, bedridden, paralyzed, osteoarthritis, and other chronic diseases of the heart and lung).

Yes we screened 91 excluding the bed ridden patients and the procedure was focused on these patients. But I shall add the initial number in the beginning .

English in some places need improvement, e.g.

“The study included 91 patients aged 18 to 35 years with N = 78 male subjects with mean age and standard deviation of 27.954 years 4.67 and N = 13 females with mean age and standard deviation of 27.978 years 4.67.” (results)
“According to previoys studies, men’s skeletal muscle degradation is correlated with age at about 27 years of age. With this clause, we have restricted our study age group to between 18-35 years.” (discussion)

The study comprised 91 individuals between the ages of 18 and 35. There were 78 male subjects (mean age, standard deviation, 27.954 years) and 13 female subjects (mean age, standard deviation, 27.978 years).
Previous research has shown that men's skeletal muscle deterioration starts to increase at the age of 27. This provision limits the study age range to those between the ages of 18 and 35.

Secondly, I don't see the purpose of providing employment information. Maybe it would be a good idea if the results were divided into two groups to show different correlations between employed and unemployed people. In the context of this work, perhaps a better question would be: Does the daily work performed by the participants involve physical or office work?

The occupation data was only collected to have a brief understanding about patient’s PA and sedentary lifestyle.

Some of the sentences in the article are incorrect or stylistically/grammatically wrong which sometimes makes them seem unclear e.g.

“Out of 91 patients, 30 were found to regularly smoke, and six had drinking habits after questions regarding lifestyle characteristics including smoking and drinking were asked.” (results)
“This increase in diaphragm thickness may result in increased inspiratory muscle efficiency or improved pulmonary mechanics, or both.” (discussion)
“Recent studies have shown and proved that diaphragm muscle thickness changes with increased PA, e.g. weight training.” (discussion)
Corrections :
In responses to inquiries on lifestyle factors including drinking and smoking, it was discovered that 30 of the 91 patients smoked frequently and 6 had drinking habits. (results)
The rise in diaphragm thickness might lead to improved pulmonary mechanics, enhanced inspiratory muscle efficiency, or even both. (discussion)
"Recent research has shown that diaphragm thickness changes with increased PA, such as weight training." (discussion)

View more View less

Competing Interests

All the authors have declared no competing interests.

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

44 Views

25 Aug 2023 | for Version 1

Ranganath Gangavelli, GITAM School of Physiotherapy, Gandhi Institute of Technology and Management (GITAM), Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India

44 Views Cite this report Responses(1)

Not Approved

The study is reported as a cross-sectional design in the Abstract. However, in the Methods section of the Manuscript, it is mentioned as a randomized crossover design approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. Further, the trial was registered as an interventional study in CTRI. Please justify the discrepancy. However, no medical/ therapeutic intervention was reported in the manuscript except for diagnostic investigation.
The hypothesis statement is not clear. The muscle Strength measures are never reported in the manuscript. Are the thickness measures equated to strength? The word "change" is confusing. Are the authors measuring the change in this study? Which of the three designs mentioned earlier is adopted in the study and is used to test the hypothesis? Or is it a cohort study to determine the "change" in the thickness of muscles as age progresses in an individual, as stated in the 2nd hypothesis? However, only a single timepoint for thickness measure was reported in the manuscript.
Regarding participants: Please justify the reason for recruiting the Patients while the data could be collected from asymptomatic volunteers with self-reported physical activity levels. Could the underlying health condition (not stated in the manuscript) influence the data? Details/reports of provisional or final diagnoses will help interpret the data.
The procedure is expressed in the future tense.
The ankle's position while measuring the soleus's thickness is repetitive.
Please justify obtaining the data on smoking and alcohol use. It is not discussed.
The expression of the result is inconsistent.
The reported diaphragm thickness is quite less than earlier reports ¹. Please discuss the reasons for the difference in recording. The population seems to be the same.
Grammar and spelling checks are required in the Results and Discussion sections.
Body Mass Index, along with Physical activity level, may have an impact on the thickness measures. Please report if the data is available.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

References

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Musculoskeletal Health, Mobilization, Pain.

Respond to this report

Responses (1)

Author Response

06 Oct 2023

suresh sukumar , Department of Medical Imaging Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India

We are grateful for the comments and suggestions.We have tried to incorporate the changes and have justified for the same.

The study is reported as a cross-sectional design in the Abstract. However, in the Methods section of the Manuscript, it is mentioned as a randomized crossover design approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. Further, the trial was registered as an interventional study in CTRI. Please justify the discrepancy. However, no medical/ therapeutic intervention was reported in the manuscript except for diagnostic investigation.

The study is an observational study to see the changes within the muscles with respect to physical activity. Since the study includes various procedures and activity we have mentioned it as interventional study. Furthermore the RCT design changes shall be made.

The hypothesis statement is not clear. The muscle Strength measures are never reported in the manuscript. Are the thickness measures equated to strength? The word "change" is confusing. Are the authors measuring the change in this study? Which of the three designs mentioned earlier is adopted in the study and is used to test the hypothesis? Or is it a cohort study to determine the "change" in the thickness of muscles as age progresses in an individual, as stated in the 2nd hypothesis? However, only a single timepoint for thickness measure was reported in the manuscript.

The muscle strength measurements are not mentioned here but instead we have measured the thickness. Also Muscle strength depends on muscle quality as well as muscle quantity (e.g. muscle volume including muscle thickness).

To simplify the word change here we have measured the muscle thickness of a physically active individual and sedentary lifestyle individual to see the changes in the muscle thickness with respect to physical activity.

It’s a combination of cross sectional and interventional study since we have taken a period of 7 days for the measurement of muscle which would be considered a short span of time to be determined as cohort study.

Regarding participants: Please justify the reason for recruiting the Patients while the data could be collected from asymptomatic volunteers with self-reported physical activity levels. Could the underlying health condition (not stated in the manuscript) influence the data? Details/reports of provisional or final diagnoses will help interpret the data.

We have chosen the patients from the KMC hospital as it was more feasible to collect data from them. Also after screening the patient we have excluded patients with recent trauma, orthopedic interventions, bedridden, paralyzed, osteoarthritis, and other chronic diseases of the heart and lungs which can hamper the muscle thickness.

The procedure is expressed in the future tense.

Apologies for the inconvenience. Corrections shall be done.

The ankle's position while measuring the soleus's thickness is repetitive

Corrections shall be done.

Please justify obtaining the data on smoking and alcohol use. It is not discussed.

The motive of obtaining the smoking and alcohol consumption details was basically to see if it hampers the change in the muscle thickness of an individual.

The expression of the result is inconsistent.

We shall work on that and improvise it.

The reported diaphragm thickness is quite less than earlier reports ¹. Please discuss the reasons for the difference in recording. The population seems to be the same

The measurement may vary with patients, the inspiration and expiration rate may change too since it’s a self- reported study minor differences can occur.

Grammar and spelling checks are required in the Results and Discussion sections.

Definitely changes will be made.

Body Mass Index, along with Physical activity level, may have an impact on the thickness measures. Please report if the data is available.

Unfortunately we haven’t taken the body mass index data with PA.

View more View less

Competing Interests

all the authors declare no competing interests

Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:

Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested

Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.

Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

[1] 1. Warburton DER: Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2006 Mar 14; 174(6): 801–809. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[2] 2. Mansoubi M, Pearson N, Clemes SA, et al.: Energy expenditure during common sitting and standing tasks: examining the 1.5 MET definition of sedentary behaviour. BMC Public Health. 2015 Dec 29; 15(1): 516. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[3] 3. Spirduso W, Etnier J: Day Theme: Weil-Being, Quality of Life, and Cognitive Function Plenary Keynotes PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, WELLBEING, AND QUALITY OF LIFE THROUGH THE LIFESPAN PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN THE PREVENTION OE DEMENTIA. J. Aging Phys. Act. 2012; 20: S7–S101. Publisher Full Text

[4] 4. Wang DXM, Yao J, Zirek Y, et al.: Muscle mass, strength, and physical performance predicting activities of daily living: a meta-analysis. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020 Feb; 11(1): 3–25. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[5] 5. Rostron ZP, Green RA, Kingsley M, et al.: Associations Between Measures of Physical Activity and Muscle Size and Strength: A Systematic Review. Arch. Rehabil. Res. Clin. Transl. 2021 Jun; 3(2): 100124. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[6] 6. Leblanc A, Taylor BA, Thompson PD, et al.: Relationships between physical activity and muscular strength among healthy adults across the lifespan. Springerplus. 2015 Dec 28; 4(1): 557. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[7] 7. Kalyani RR, Corriere M, Ferrucci L: Age-related and disease-related muscle loss: the effect of diabetes, obesity, and other diseases. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014 Oct; 2(10): 819–829. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[8] 8. Rostron ZP, Green RA, Kingsley M, et al.: Associations Between Measures of Physical Activity and Muscle Size and Strength: A Systematic Review. Arch. Rehabil. Res. Clin. Transl. 2021 Jun; 3(2): 100124. Publisher Full Text

[9] 9. Fujiwara K, Asai H, Toyama H, et al.: Changes in muscle thickness of gastrocnemius and soleus associated with age and sex. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2010 Feb; 22(1): 24–30. Publisher Full Text

[10] 10. Bujang MA, Baharum N: Sample Size Guideline for Correlation Analysis. World J. Soc. Sci. Res. 2016 Mar 10; 3(1): 37. Publisher Full Text

[11] 11. Takahashi Y, Fujino Y, Miura K, et al.: Intra- and inter-rater reliability of rectus femoris muscle thickness measured using ultrasonography in healthy individuals. Ultrasound J. 2021 Dec 15; 13(1): 21. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[12] 12. Fujiwara K, Asai H, Toyama H, et al.: Changes in muscle thickness of gastrocnemius and soleus associated with age and sex. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2010 Feb 25; 22(1): 24–30. Publisher Full Text

[13] 13. Boussuges A, Rives S, Finance J, et al.: Ultrasound Assessment of Diaphragm Thickness and Thickening: Reference Values and Limits of Normality When in a Seated Position. Front. Med. (Lausanne). 2021 Oct 27; 8. Publisher Full Text

[14] 14. Goligher EC, Laghi F, Detsky ME, et al.: Measuring diaphragm thickness with ultrasound in mechanically ventilated patients: feasibility, reproducibility and validity. Intensive Care Med. 2015 Apr 19; 41(4): 642–649. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[15] 15. Macassa G, Ahmadi N, Alfredsson J, et al.: Employment status and differences in physical activity behavior during times of economic hardship: results of a population-based study. Int. J. Med. Sci. Public Health. 2016; 5(1): 102. Publisher Full Text

[16] 16. Van Domelen DR, Koster A, Caserotti P, et al.: Employment and Physical Activity in the U.S. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2011 Aug; 41(2): 136–145. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[17] 17. Ikezoe T, Mori N, Nakamura M, et al.: Age-related muscle atrophy in the lower extremities and daily physical activity in elderly women. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2011 Sep; 53(2): e153–e157. Publisher Full Text

[18] 18. Anjana RM, Pradeepa R, Das AK, et al.: Physical activity and inactivity patterns in India – results from the ICMR-INDIAB study (Phase-1) [ICMR-INDIAB-5]. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2014 Dec 26; 11(1): 26. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[19] 19. Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, et al.: Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants. Lancet Glob. Health. 2018 Oct; 6(10): e1077–e1086. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[20] 20. Schoenfeld BJ, Peterson MD, Ogborn D, et al.: Effects of Low- vs. High-Load Resistance Training on Muscle Strength and Hypertrophy in Well-Trained Men. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2015 Oct; 29(10): 2954–2963. Publisher Full Text

[21] 21. Silva AM, Shen W, Heo M, et al.: Ethnicity-related skeletal muscle differences across the lifespan. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2010 Jan; 22(1): 76–82. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[22] 22. IKEZOE T: Age-Related Change in Muscle Characteristics and Resistance Training for Older Adults. Phys. Ther. Res. 2020 Dec 20; 23(2): 99–105. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[23] 23. Enright SJ, Unnitham VB, Heward C, et al.: Effect of high-intensity inspiratory muscle training on lung volumes, diaphragm thickness, and exercise capacity in subjects who are healthy. Phys. Ther. 2006; 86(3): 345–354. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Active adults have thicker peripheral muscles and diaphragm: A cross-sectional study

Abstract

Keywords

Revised Amendments from Version 1

Introduction

Methods

Study design

Figure 1. STROBE flow diagram showing the inclusion of participants.

Participants

Physical activity

Muscle thickness

Figure 2. The thickness measurements of all the muscles.

Procedure

To measure the quadriceps

To measure the soleus

To measure the diaphragm

Results

Baseline characteristics

Table 1. Patient’s characteristics.

Physical activity among the participants

Association between muscle thickness and physical activity

Table 2. Thickness values in comparison with PA.

Figure 3. Shows the correlation between lower limb muscle thickness to the PA.

Professional status and PA

Discussion

Physical activity levels in the participants

Muscle thickness in the participants

Conclusions

Limitations and recommendations

Data availability

Underlying data

References

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

Comments on this article

Browse by related subjects

Competing Interests Policy

Stay Updated