Keywords
Senior, Table Tennis, Quality of life, physical health, psychological health
This article is included in the QUVAE Research and Publications gateway.
Table tennis presented a unique and accessible sport for people of all ages, particularly seniors compared to other sports.
This study utilized a quantitative with 136 Table tennis players those who registered for attending in the Thailand Master Table tennis Championships 2024 which hosted in January 2024 at Chiangmai. The questionnaire based on the measurement quality of life, WHOQOL Thai version, and analyzed using Descriptive statistics, Pearson Correlation.
Pearson correlation coefficients between the scores of the quality of life in four dimensions and the overall score revealed significant correlations (p < 0.01) with all dimensions, including physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environmental health.
Playing Table tennis for senior in the tournament level helped to improve the quality of life in all domains.
Senior, Table Tennis, Quality of life, physical health, psychological health
According the second reviewer's comments, we extended some statement to give more details for readers and also added new reference suggested in this version of manuscript.
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Johnny Lo
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Yuqi He
Participation in sports has been a well-established phenomenon with documented positive influences on quality of life (Peráčková & Peráček, 2020). Engaging in physical activity, a key component of sports participation, yielded a range of benefits for individuals. These included improved brain health, weight management, disease prevention, enhanced bone and muscle strength, and a greater capacity for performing daily activities (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2023). Importantly, research has also shown that physical activity was highly effective in managing anxiety, depression symptoms, and distress across various elderly populations (Singh et al., 2023).
Quality of life, a multifaceted concept encompassing physical, psychological, social, and environmental well-being (World Health Organization [WHO], 2024), reflects an individual’s perception of their life situation shaped by cultural values, goals, expectations, and concerns (Cai et al., 2021). Research consistently demonstrates a positive link between physical activity and quality of life (Gavala-González et al., 2022). Notably, participation in sports, a specific type of physical activity, offers distinct advantages for both physical and psychological health, as well as social outcomes in adults (Eather et al., 2023). Several instruments exist for measuring quality of life, such as the Quality-of-Life Scale (Flanagan, 1978), the McGill Quality of Life questionnaire – the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument (WHO, 2012), the Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2000), and Expanded (Cohen et al., 2019).
Table tennis emerged as a unique and accessible sport for people of all ages, particularly seniors. Compared to other sports, it offered a lower risk of injury, making it suitable for individuals with joint limitations (Killerspin, 2024). Table tennis also provided benefits for youth in various aspects, considering the social ecology, including individual factors, social support networks, and the physical environment where the game is played (Xiao et al., 2020). Additionally, table tennis was relatively inexpensive, required minimal space, and could be played throughout one’s lifespan, making it an attractive option for many (Sportanddev, 2021).
Several studies explored the positive effects of table tennis across different age groups. Research by Naderi et al. (2018) suggested that regular table tennis training improved lipid profiles and body composition in aging men. Similarly, Pradas et al. (2021) found that children playing table tennis regularly for two years exhibited better physical fitness and the development of bone, compared to those who didn’t regularly play. The benefits extended beyond physical health. Deprá et al. (2022) demonstrated that a twice-weekly table tennis program could improve agility and balance in physically active seniors. Ishiguro and Amano (2022) showed that playing table tennis affected many benefits to physical domain such as muscle strength, body composition, and physical performance. Zhang and Min (2022) indicated that the mental health of girls has been changed positively after joining the table tennis exercise. He et al. (2022) study on the biomechanics of table tennis footwork, demonstrating that table tennis emerged as a unique and accessible sport for people of all ages, particularly seniors. Compared to other sports, it offered a lower risk of injury, making it suitable for individuals with joint limitations. Finally, Olsson et al. (2020) showed that table tennis training was safe and feasible for individuals with Parkinson’s disease, potentially improving balance, well-being, and self-reported physical activity levels.
The previous reports indicated the positive impacts to quality of life from playing table tennis. However, they had never been assessed in Thailand. Therefore, this study investigates the quality of life of senior table tennis players in Thailand, particularly focusing on the association between quality-of-life aspects and players characteristics. This analysis will provide deeper information on the effect of competing table tennis and quality of life of senior players in Thailand.
Tennis Championships 2024. The questionnaire used for data collection was based on the WHOQOL measurement of quality of life. The WHOQOL-BREF tool consists of 26 items, which are divided into four domains: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. The scores for each domain are calculated by summing the scores of the individual items within that domain. The overall score is calculated by summing the scores of all the items. The raw score was used as final score. According to the standard scoring criteria of WHOQOL-BREF, it was not recalculated into 0-100 scale. The quantitative analysis involved both descriptive statistics to describe the characteristics of the participants, Pearson correlation to examine the relationships between quality-of-life dimensions and overall score, and Chi-square to determine the association of the characteristic with quality of life in overall domains. The WHOQOL-BREF scores were categorized into three group of QoL scores i.e., Low, Middle, and High, to make it more simplified interpretable and to provide a structured way of well-being assessing in different independent domains. Thus, this research used the chi-square test to examine the relationship between variables in order to compare and further design tailored group interventions. Examples of items include: “How satisfied are you with your current health?” and “How satisfied are you with your sleep quality” (To-aj Oam et al., 2024). The association between the WHOQOL-BREF overall and domains was assessed using Pearson correlation analysis. The results indicated significant correlations between the quality-of-overall score and each domain (physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environmental health) measured by the WHOQOL-BREF in Table 3.
This research was ethically approved by the Office of the Committee for Research Ethics (Social Sciences), Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Mahidol University with the approval number 2023/205.3011. The Committee of Research Ethics (Social Sciences) is in full compliance with International Guidelines of Human Resource Protection such as declaration of Helsinki, The Belmont Report, and CIOMS guidelines. Written consent was obtained from all participants involved in this study. They were clearly instructed about the project and informed that the collected data would be used for publishing the findings. Participants were also given the opportunity to withdraw from the study at any time. However, none of the participants chose to withdraw and they continued until the completion of the study.
The participants were all Table tennis players (136 Table tennis players) those who registered for attending in the Thailand Master Table tennis Championships 2024 which hosted in January 2024 at Chiang Mai, Thailand. The three experienced researchers have been trained and practiced for the data collection protocol to ensure the research process quality. All the participants were collected the data before the competition began. Each participant spent about 30 minutes for completing the questionnaire (To-aj, Oam et al., 2024). All the participants were closely assisted by the research assistants regarding to the questionnaire explanation. All questionnaires have been proved by the researchers to confirm all items were answered.
The questionnaire based on the measurement quality of life, WHOQOL which consisted of 4 dimensions: Physical Health, Psychological Health, Social Relationship, and Environmental Health. The instrument was measured using the five-items of the WHOQOL measured on a five-point Likert scale.
Descriptive statistics, Pearson Correlation by using SPSS version 22 (https://www.ibm.com/spss).
As a pilot study, the primary objective was to explore the relationship between playing table tennis and the quality of life of senior players and to assess the feasibility of conducting a more extensive study in the future. This serves as crucial initial steps in the research process, providing valuable preliminary data and insights that can inform the development of larger, more substantive investigations. While the current study may have limitations in terms of its scope and depth, it lays the groundwork for future research endeavors and can contribute to the refinement of research methodologies and the identification of areas for further exploration.
The demographic characteristics of the results revealed that the majority of respondents were male (61.03%), indicating potential gender bias that should be taken into account in the interpretation of the results. The average age of the participants was 51.56 years (range: 40-76 years), with 77.94% in the 40-59 years old range, indicating a focus on moderate-to-high adults who are likely to have a stable careers and education-related life experiences. A large number of respondents have a bachelor’s degree (58.82%), which emphasizes a relatively high level of education that may affect their outlook. Notably, 87.50% reported no history of illness, indicating a relatively healthy sample, which may limit the ability to apply the results to populations with diverse health characteristics. These details were further presented in Table 1.
The study used the Thai version of the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire to assess participants’ quality of life, with the average scores in each area as follows: the score for physical, mental health, social relationships, and environmental health were 26.35, 23.58, 11.01, and 29.32 respectively. In terms of social relationships, the average score was lowest compared to the other three areas. Environmental health has the highest average score. The overall score is higher than the score in all aspects. Details were presented in Table 2.
When considering the physical health dimension, it was found to be correlated with the psychological health dimension at a statistically significant level of 0.01. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was 0.704, indicating a high level of correlation, and they were a direct variation. When considering the social relationship dimension, it was found to be correlated with the environmental health dimension at a statistically significant level of 0.01. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was 0.708, indicating a high level of correlation, and they were also a direct variation. They were displayed in Table 3.
When considering the individual factors, the respondents working in private sector needed to be focused on. The study revealed that this group of respondents tend to have higher quality of life levels in the psychological health dimension, ranging from moderate to high, compared to other occupational groups with statistical significance (p <0.001***). The study also revealed that the respondents working in private sector tend to have a moderate level of quality of life in the social relationship dimension compared to other occupational groups. On the other hand, civil servants have a higher level of quality of life in the social relationship dimension compared to other occupational groups with statistical significance (p < 0.023*). Moreover, the same group tend to have a moderate and high level of quality of life in the social relationship dimension compared to other occupational groups with statistical significance (p < 0.038*). All details were demonstrated in Table 4.
Individual characteristics | Domains of quality of life | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical Health | Psychological Health | Social Relationship | Environmental Health | Overall | ||||||
Mean | Std. | Mean | Std. | Mean | Std. | Mean | Std. | Mean | Std. | |
Gender | ||||||||||
Male | 3.528 | 0.448 | 3.860 | 0.567 | 3.670 | 0.599 | 3.650 | 0.513 | 3.677 | 0.532 |
Female | 3.824 | 2.221 | 3.747 | 0.628 | 3.723 | 0.656 | 3.688 | 0.624 | 3.746 * | 1.032 |
Age (yrs.) | ||||||||||
59 or under | 3.695 | 1.600 | 3.788 | 0.586 | 3.732 | 0.623 | 3.645 | 0.566 | 3.715 * | 0.843 |
60 or over | 3.461 | 0.438 | 3.913 | 0.614 | 3.544 | 0.596 | 3.737 | 0.528 | 3.663 | 0.568 |
Education | ||||||||||
Secondary school or under | 4.495 | 0.176 | 3.986 | 0.765 | 3.577 | 0.886 | 3.600 | 0.648 | 3.914 | 0.618 |
Vocational Degree/Bachelor Degree | 3.491 | 0.418 | 3.752 | 0.564 | 3.629 | 0.576 | 3.584 | 0.532 | 3.614 | 0.522 |
Master Degree or over | 3.669 | 0.327 | 3.912 | 0.567 | 3.916 | 0.555 | 3.921 | 0.518 | 4.083 * | 0.491 |
Occupation | ||||||||||
Farmer/Civil servant | 3.625 | 0.385 | 4.021 | 0.456 | 3.846 | 0.569 | 3.790 | 0.544 | 3.821 | 0.489 |
Company employee/State enterprise | 3.636 | 0.357 | 3.791 | 0.619 | 3.777 | 0.649 | 3.739 | 0.616 | 3.736 | 0.560 |
Business owner/Other | 3.655 | 1.901 | 3.722 | 0.623 | 3.586 | 0.622 | 3.580 | 0.536 | 3.908 * | 0.920 |
Illness | ||||||||||
No | 3.677 | 1.519 | 3.821 | 0.592 | 3.728 | 0.610 | 3.668 | 0.561 | 3.723 * | 0.820 |
Yes | 3.411 | 0.387 | 3.776 | 0.607 | 3.431 | 0.642 | 3.647 | 0.545 | 3.566 | 0.545 |
Table 4 showed the overall mean scores for male and female. Mean score for female was 3.746 and mean score for male was 3.677. The difference of those mean scores were 0.069 (3.746 – 3.677 = 0.069). Females had a higher mean (0.069) than males. The mean (0.052) for the 59 or underage group was higher than the 60 or over age group. The master’s degree or over education group (0.169) had a higher mean than both the Secondary school or under group and the Vocational Degree/Bachelor Degree group (0.469). Business owners and others (0.087) had a higher mean than farmers/civil servants (0.172) and company employees/state enterprise employees. Those with no illness (0.157) had a higher mean than those with illness.
When determining the association of the characteristic with quality of life in overall domain, it found that there was only one of the five variables studied had a significant association with overall quality of life (p-value <0.05). The quality of life in overall was associated with career’s variable p-value at 0.038. All details were demonstrated in Table 5.
The study found a correlation between demographic variables and the dimension of quality of life among Thai senior table tennis players. Differences in quality-of-life scores were found in relation to the age, gender, and experience of table tennis of participants. These differences appear in physical health. Mental health, social relationships, and environmental health, which were measured by the Thai version of the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire.
The findings of this study align with researches conducted in the past which were as follows;
The study found that the most of them were self-employed. It is in line of Groessl et al. Results found that the average cost/participant was $1134 and $175 for the physical activity (PA) (Groessl et al., 2009).
Our analysis using the WHOQOL-BREF Thai version revealed the environmental health dimension had the highest average score (29.32) among the four quality of life dimensions. This aligns with Jolanki (2021) on senior housing fulfilling its promise of providing accessible physical and social environments. These environments encourage residents to be independent, physically active, and participate in social activities, ultimately promoting well-being and healthy aging. Similarly, Stenner et al. (2019) highlighted the continued importance of physical activity for some older adults, potentially contributing to improved health and well-being. It’s important to acknowledge risk factors as well. Seangpraw et al. (2020) identified factors like alcohol consumption and illness as significant stressors for the rural Thai elderly population.
Our analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation (p < 0.01) between the social relationship and environmental health dimensions. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) of 0.708 displayed a strong positive correlation, suggesting that these dimensions directly vary together. This finding aligns with research by Jia et al. (2023) who identified a significant correlation between living arrangements, preferred living arrangements, and depression in older adults. Similarly, Pei et al. (2022) demonstrated that living arrangements play a crucial role in indirectly predicting depression through social support. Furthermore, Chen (2019) found that preferred living arrangements reflect needs, cultural norms, and current experiences. Their results support the hypothesis that concordance between preferred and actual living arrangements improves subjective well-being (SWB) in older parents, including reducing depressive symptoms and enhancing happiness.
The study examined the individual factors and found that the respondents working in the business owner/other tended to have higher quality of life scores in the psychological health aligns with research by Dirzyte and Patapas (2022) who found that employees in private sector reported greater support, dignity, forgiveness, care, and positive practices, along with higher optimism scores, compared to public sector employees.
Our finding found that the quality of life in overall was associated with career’s variable. This finding aligns with research by Riva et al. (2022) studied how the job quality was able to impact a person’s overall well-being. This research used a measure called CASP-12 as the research intervention. The findings showed that people with better jobs tended to have higher well-being scores. Similarly, Green et al. (2024) had a similar finding which suggested that the job quality was the important for well-being as physical health.
The results of the study on the quality of life of senior table tennis players in Thailand are quite significant. The findings revealed that there is a strong correlation between playing table tennis at the tournament level and improvements in the quality of life across all domains. This suggests that participating in table tennis has a positive impact on the physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environmental health of senior players. These results are in line with previous research that has demonstrated the positive effects of sports participation, particularly in terms of physical and psychological well-being. The study also highlights the unique advantages of table tennis as a sport for individuals of all ages, especially seniors. Table tennis not only offers physical benefits but also provides a social and accessible platform for individuals to engage in physical activity. The findings from this study contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting the positive relationship between sports participation and quality of life. It also emphasizes the importance of promoting sports like table tennis to enhance the well-being of senior individuals. Further research in this area could explore the specific mechanisms through which table tennis contributes to the overall quality of life of senior players, as well as the potential implications for developing targeted interventions to promote healthy aging through sports participation. The reason for selecting this sub-population was this tournament is one of the biggest table tennis tournaments in Thailand where participants came from all around the world. The absence of a control group in the study limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions about the causal relationship between playing table tennis and improvements in quality of life, as suggested in the authors’ conclusion. While the significant correlations found between playing table tennis at the tournament level and the quality of life in all domains are noteworthy, future research should consider incorporating control groups and longitudinal designs to establish a more robust understanding of the potential impact of table tennis participation on the quality of life of senior players. Additionally, qualitative research methods could be employed to gain a deeper understanding of the experiences and perspectives of senior table tennis players, providing a more comprehensive view of the potential effects of the sport on their quality of life. This study was a cross-sectional survey of quality of life of this sub-population. This objective of this study was not to compare the quality of life between the participants and general population. However, the result showed the comparison between domains of QoL and individual factors. Therefore, the methodology was not designed for having the control group.
In future research, it would be valuable to incorporate a comparative analysis of the quality-of-life measures for senior table tennis players with those of the general Thai senior population to provide important context for understanding the specific impact of table tennis participation on the well-being of senior players. While this comparison was not conducted in the present study, it represents a promising avenue for further investigation, offering insights into the potential benefits associated with engaging in table tennis at the tournament level and contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the quality of life of senior individuals in Thailand.
Playing Table tennis for senior in the tournament level helped to improve the quality of life in all domains. The results can be applied for those stakeholders that relevant to the Table tennis organizations whether the public or private section which were responsible for supporting the senior in the community to exercise and to compete in the Table tennis tournament. The further study would be able to apply with the different participants such as youth players which the research finding would be the benefit for improving their quality of life.
Figshare- Underlying Data - Table Tennis EN.xlsx, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25780110.v2 (To-aj et al., 2024).
This project contains following dataset:
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).
This research project has been funded by Mahidol University (Fundamental Fund: fiscal year 2024 by National Science Research and Innovation Fund (NSRF)). Moreover, the authors also would like to express their gratitude to QUVAE Research and Publications for their valuable assistance with the deposition of the raw data to the Figshare repository.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Applied statistics
References
1. He Y, Shao S, Fekete G, Yang X, et al.: Lower Limb Muscle Forces in Table Tennis Footwork during Topspin Forehand Stroke Based on the OpenSim Musculoskeletal Model: A Pilot Study. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics. 2022; 19 (4): 221-235 Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Sports Medicine, Sports Biomechanics, Musculoskeletal Simulation
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Applied statistics
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Sports Medicine, Sports Biomechanics, Musculoskeletal Simulation
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
No
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
No
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
No
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Applied statistics
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 4 (revision) 04 Mar 25 |
||
Version 3 (revision) 14 Nov 24 |
read | |
Version 2 (revision) 18 Oct 24 |
read | read |
Version 1 17 Sep 24 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)