Keywords
preterm labor, prevalence, risk factors
This article is included in the Manipal Academy of Higher Education gateway.
The study aimed at identifying the prevalence of preterm labor and the associated risk factors.
A quantitative approach using a retrospective case-control study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Udupi district, Karnataka. The sample consisted of women who delivered in the hospital. Among them, cases (250) were records of women who had delivered before 37 weeks of gestation, and controls (500) were records of women who delivered after 37 weeks 1 of gestation without any complications.
The study revealed that the prevalence of preterm labor was 356 (14.86%) out of 2402 deliveries. Among these, only 250 were assessed. Preterm labor was significantly correlated with age, place of residence, degree of education, occupation, marital status, gravida, number of deliveries, type of deliveries, gap between births, blood type, and religion. Pregnant women exposed or at risk for preterm labor included those diagnosed with pregnancy-induced hypertension, those who took medication during pregnancy, those with a history of abortion, those engaged in intense physical labor, and those who conceived after the age of 30.
The prevalence of preterm labor can be minimized if modifiable risk factors are controlled, while non-modifiable risk factors require keen supervision. Health professionals must be alert to all modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors.
preterm labor, prevalence, risk factors
The revised manuscript has been meticulously updated to incorporate the corrections suggested by the reviewers. The Abstract has been revised with recent information, and an additional citation has been included in the Introduction, along with a new paragraph to bridge existing gaps. The Table has been modified to remove the number of deliveries. A justification for the Adjusted Odds Ratio has been added. The Methods section has undergone minor revisions, including additional details on sample selection and tools, as well as the inclusion of a clarifying paragraph. Current bibliographic references have been incorporated and properly sequenced. A citation has also been added to the Discussion section.
Furthermore, an extensive grammatical review has been conducted to enhance the clarity and coherence of the manuscript.
To read any peer review reports and author responses for this article, follow the "read" links in the Open Peer Review table.
A neonate born after 37 weeks requires significant attention and care as they transition into a new environment post-birth. The morbidity associated with preterm labor can persist into later life, leading to physical, psychological, and economic costs. Globally, one in 10 babies is born preterm, and approximately one million babies die annually due to complications from preterm births.2–6 Preterm labor is an obstetric emergency and poses a threat to population health, contributing to 75% of infant mortality.5–10
Preterm labor not only imposes financial and emotional distress on families but can also result in permanent disabilities (physical or neural) in infants. Surviving babies often exhibit periodic disabilities such as learning, visual, and hearing difficulties. The preterm birth rate ranges from 5% to 7% of live births in developed countries compared to developing countries.11,12 Despite an increased understanding of potential risk factors and their pathological mechanisms, the preterm birth rate has remained unchanged or even increased in most countries over the past two decades.13,14
The pathway to preterm labor remains unclear, whether it results from the interaction of multiple pathways or an independent pathway. Factors commonly affecting preterm labor include the health condition of the mother or fetus, genetic causes, environmental exposure, infertility treatments, habits, socioeconomic factors, and iatrogenic factors. Preterm birth was the second leading cause of death in children under five years old in 2010. Of the approximately 3.1 million newborn deaths that year, a quarter occurred within the first 24 hours after birth (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2020).15,16
In India, out of 27 million neonates born each year, 3.5 million are delivered prematurely. The antenatal period, labor process, and postnatal period are critical for infant and maternal survival.11 Preterm labor is unpredictable, but cues can be identified, and preventive measures can be taken. Physicians strive to delay delivery to allow the baby to grow as much as possible. Therefore, pregnant women should not omit any essential health details during regular visits to the obstetrics clinic. They should provide a detailed history of their lifestyle, past pregnancies, and any health issues they have experienced and clarify any doubts.11
Given the high prevalence and significant impact of preterm labor, there is a crucial need to assess various risk factors associated with it. The statistics and incidence rates indicate that preterm births contribute to substantial infant mortality and long-term morbidity.17 However, there is a gap in understanding the specific modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors that contribute to preterm labor in different regions, including Udupi district. Identifying these risk factors can help develop targeted interventions to reduce preterm birth rates, improve maternal and neonatal health outcomes, and alleviate the financial and emotional burden on affected families. This research aims to fill this gap by providing comprehensive data on the risk factors specific to the study population, thereby informing healthcare strategies and policies.
The statistics presented above and the supporting data assist obstetric care providers in designing appropriate studies and planning measures to decrease delivery rates before 37 weeks of gestation and improve the health status of women who have delivered. This will help reduce and fill the gaps between study areas, serving as baseline information for other countries. The present study was conducted to identify preventive measures to determine the risk factors of preterm labor. Early identification and extra precautions for risk factors, such as medication intake during pregnancy and previous abortion, can prevent preterm labor. Moderate risk factors like hard physical work and conception age above 30 years can prevent preterm labor if managed.
N=750 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cases (250) | Controls (500) | |||
Variables | Mean | SD | Mean | SD |
Age (years) | 27.44 | 3.564 | 27.07 | 3.498 |
Height (in cms) | 154.32 | 5.918 | 154.34 | 5.695 |
Total weight gain during pregnancy (in kg) | 7.67 | 3.815 | 7.54 | 3.746 |
N=250 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sample characteristics | Case | Control | χ2 | Df | P | ||
(f ) | (%) | (f ) | (%) | ||||
Age in years | |||||||
19–22 | 15 | 6 | 42 | 8.4 | |||
23–26 | 82 | 32.8 | 125 | 25 | 4.114 | 16 | *.001 |
27–30 | 99 | 39.6 | 209 | 41.8 | |||
31–34 | 49 | 19.6 | 124 | 24.8 | |||
35 < | 5 | 2 | - | - | |||
Residence | |||||||
Urban | 59 | 23.6 | 166 | 33.2 | 18.369 | 2 | *.001 |
Rural | 191 | 76.4 | 334 | 66.8 | |||
Education level | |||||||
Illiterate | 6 | 2.4 | 42 | 8.4 | |||
Primary/secondary school | 5 | 2 | -- | - | |||
PUC | 6 | 2.4 | 125 | 25 | .83.781 | 4 | *.001 |
Graduation | 30 | 12 | 41 | 8.2 | |||
Not specified | 203 | 81.2 | 292 | 58.4 | |||
Occupation | |||||||
Housewife | 200 | 80 | 250 | 50 | |||
Peasant | 14 | 5.6 | - | - | 1.084 | 3 | *.001 |
Government | 6 | 2.4 | 42 | 8.4 | |||
Others | 30 | 12 | 208 | 41.6 | |||
Marital status | |||||||
Married | 250 | 100 | 500 | 100 | |||
Living with spouse | 250 | 100 | 500 | 100 | 10.067 | 1 | *.004 |
Gravida | |||||||
Primi | 189 | 75.6 | 167 | 33.4 | |||
Second | 38 | 15.2 | 251 | 50.2 | 1.554 | 3 | *.001 |
Third | 11 | 4.4 | - | - | |||
Fourth & above | 12 | 4.8 | 82 | 16.4 | |||
Number of deliveries | |||||||
Once | 189 | 75.6 | 167 | 33.4 | 42.697 | 2 | *.001 |
Twice | 61 | 24.4 | 333 | 66.6 | |||
Type of delivery | |||||||
Normal delivery | 25 | 10 | 500 | 100 | 6.429 | 2 | *.001 |
Caesarean section | 225 | 90 | - | - | |||
Birth interval (in yrs.) | |||||||
1–2 | 32 | 8.8 | 292 | 58.4 | |||
3–4 | 21 | 8.4 | 83 | 16.6 | |||
5 & above | 18 | 7.2 | - | - | 2.136 | 3 | *.001 |
Not specified | 179 | 75.6 | 125 | 25 | |||
Blood group | |||||||
A+ | 59 | 23.6 | 209 | 41.8 | |||
B+ | 57 | 22.8 | 83 | 16.6 | 70.768 | 5 | *.001 |
AB+ | 12 | 4.8 | - | - | |||
O+ | 111 | 44.4 | 167 | 33.4 | |||
A- | 6 | 2.4 | - | ||||
O- | 5 | 2 | 41 | 8.2 | |||
Religion | |||||||
Hindu | 227 | 90.8 | 375 | 75 | 1.137 | 3 | *.001 |
Christian | 23 | 9.2 | - | - | |||
Muslim | - | - | 125 | 25 |
N= 750 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cases | Controls | Unadjusted Odds | P | Adjusted Odds ratio | ||
(250) | (500) | ratio | value | (95%CI [LL,UL]) | ||
Yes | Yes | |||||
n (%) | n (%) | |||||
Urinary tract infection | Yes | 6(2.4) | 41(8.2) | .275(.115, .658) | .127 | 4.691(.644, 34.198) |
No* | 244(97.6) | 459(91.8) | 1 | 1 | ||
H/o any other chronic disease | Yes | 40(16) | 42(8.4) | 2.138(1.345,3.399) | .034 | 5.110(1.128,23.153) |
No* | 210(84) | 458(91.6) | 1 | 1 | ||
Pregnancy induced Hypertension | Yes | 109(43.6) | 41(8.2) | 8.654(5.769,12.984) | *.001 | 1.288(140.829,1.17) |
No* | 141(56.4) | 459(91.8) | 1 | 1 | ||
Medication intake during pregnancy | Yes | 173(69.2) | 166(33.2) | 1.117(.805, 1.548) | 62.406(7.599,512.513)1 | |
No* | 77(30.8) | 334(66.8) | 1 | *.001 | 1 | |
Short cervical length | Yes | 235(94) | 35(7) | .321(.181, .569) | .000(.000) | |
No* | 15(6) | 465(93) | 1 | .989 | 1 | |
Hospitalization during pregnancy | Yes | 175(70) | 141(28.2) | 1.160(.835, 1.610) | .095(.012,.749) | |
No | 75(30) | 359(71.8) | 1 | .026 | 1 | |
Premature rupture of membrane | Yes | 82(32.8) | 35(7) | 2.452(1.721,3.493) | 2.269(.000, .749) | |
No | 168(67.2) | 465(93) | 1 | .991 | 1 | |
Induced vaginal delivery | Yes | 28(11.2) | 53(10.6) | .374(.241, .582) | 1.228(.000) | |
No | 222(88.8) | 447(89.4) | 1 | .998 | 1 | |
Still birth | Yes | 9(3.6) | 40(8) | .074(.037, .149) | .998 | .000(.000) |
No | 241(96.4) | 460(92) | 1 | 1 | ||
Abortion | Yes | 38(15.2) | 51(10.2) | .544(.364, .811) | .007(.001,.066) | |
No | 212(84.8) | 449(89.8) | 1 | *.001 | 1 | |
Diabetis mellitus | Yes | 40(16) | 17(3.4) | 2.132(1.339.3.395) | 1.209(.000) | |
No | 210(84) | 483(96.6) | 1 | .990 | 1 | |
Hard physical work | Yes | 14(5.6) | 17(3.4) | .664(.355,1.24) | .021(.002,.217) | |
No | 236(94.4) | 483(96.6) | 1 | *.001 | 1 | |
Conception at 30 or above | Yes | 46(18.4) | 51(10.2) | .684(.468, .999) | 24.837(2.648,232.965) | |
No | 204(81.6) | 449(89.8) | 1 | *.005 | 1 | |
Being obese pregnancy | Yes | 6(2.4) | 17(3.4) | .275(.115,.658) | 1.136(.000) | |
No | 244(97.6) | 483(96.6) | 1 | .999 | 1 |
Confounders are selected based on their potential to influence both the exposure and the outcome. In this table:
• Confounders such as age, previous medical history, socio-economic status, etc., might have been adjusted based on their relevance to the risk factors being studied.
• Reasons for Inclusion: The goal is to control for variables that could distort the true relationship between the risk factors and the outcomes being analyzed. By adjusting for these confounders, the analysis aims to isolate the effect of the specific risk factors on the outcomes more accurately.
This retrospective case-control study aimed to identify the prevalence and risk factors for preterm labor by examining the case records of women who delivered in tertiary care hospitals in the Udupi district. The cases were women who delivered before 37 weeks of gestation, and the controls were women who delivered after 37 weeks of gestation without any complications. As per the sample size calculation, a purposive sampling technique was employed to select the records of 250 out of 356 women.
Study Timeline and Record Selection
• Timelines: The records reviewed spanned from January 2016 to December 2016.
• Criteria for Record Inclusion: Records were included if they met the criteria for gestational age determination based on the last menstrual period (LMP) or early ultrasound.
• Exclusion of Records: Records with missing data were excluded from the study, resulting in the exclusion of 50 records.
• A purposive sampling technique was employed to select the records, resulting in a sample size of 250 cases (preterm deliveries) and 500 controls (full-term deliveries), maintaining a case-to-control ratio of 1:2.
• Total Records Reviewed: 2456
• Excluded Records: 50 (due to missing data)
• Included Records: 2406
• Cases (preterm deliveries before 37 weeks): 250
• Controls (full-term deliveries after 37 weeks): 500
Sample Selection
• Sample Size Calculation: The sample size for cases (250) was purposively selected from the 356 identified preterm deliveries.
• Cases to Controls Ratio: A 1:2 ratio was used for case-control selection, resulting in 500 control records (full-term deliveries without complications).
The tools used included a maternal socio-demographic proforma and a structured Risk Assessment tool for preterm labor. This tool classified items into modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors, with the former further subdivided into social, economic, and environmental factors and the latter into medical, obstetrical, and fetal conditions.
The study utilized a structured Risk Assessment tool
• Tool Development: The tool was prepared by the researchers and validated through expert review and pilot testing.
• Classification of Risk Factors: The tool categorized risk factors into modifiable (social, economic, and environmental) and non-modifiable (medical, obstetrical, and fetal) factors.
• The tool was prepared by the researchers and validated through expert review and pilot testing. It was also validated by assessing its reliability and consistency using statistical measures such as Cronbach’s alpha.18–20
Data Analysis Plan
• Software Used: Data were analyzed using SPSS version 16.
• Descriptive Statistics: Used to summarize the demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population.
• Univariate Analysis: Initially computed to identify potential risk factors.
• Multivariate Logistic Regression: Adjusted odds ratios were calculated to obtain more accurate results, considering multiple variables simultaneously.
The study received permission from various authorities related to the data and ethical clearance (IEC 30/2018), and it was registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2018/05/014078). Data were analyzed using SPSS version 16, employing descriptive and inferential statistics.21
The study identified that the prevalence of preterm labor was 14.82% (356 out of 2402 deliveries). The background characteristics of the cases and controls varied, with the majority residing in rural areas and being homemakers. The mean height and age among the cases were 154.32 cm and 27.44 years, respectively, and the average total weight gain during pregnancy was 7.67 kg.
Religion was considered as a factor influencing preterm birth because cultural beliefs and practices, including religious ones, can significantly impact health behaviors and outcomes. For instance, religious beliefs may influence decisions about seeking medical care, adherence to prenatal care recommendations, and the use of traditional medicines or rituals1.
Univariate analysis was initially computed, followed by the computation of the adjusted odds ratio to obtain an accurate result. The data showed that risk factors like pregnancy-induced Hypertension Hypertension (p=.001), medication intake (p=.001), and conception age at 30 or above (p=.005) are associated with preterm labor, which is significant at the 0.005 level. Previous abortion (p=.001) and hard physical work (p=.001) are statistically preventive factors but are not clinically preventive risk factors. Most women in both the case and control groups were administered medications such as Tibolone (a steroid) and Ceftriaxone (an antibiotic). Statistically, these medications were associated with an increased likelihood of preterm labor. However, from a clinical perspective, these steroids and antibiotics are typically administered as a prophylactic measure for cases that progress into labor before 37 weeks of gestation.22,23
The statement that medications were associated with an increased likelihood of preterm labor reflects their use in clinical practice. These medications are often given to women already at risk of preterm labor to mitigate complications. Therefore, their use is more common among women who experience preterm labor, creating a statistical association.
Steroids and antibiotics should not be seen as risk factors for causing preterm labor. Instead, they are important preventive measures administered to manage the risks associated with preterm labor and improve outcomes for the baby.
The study revealed a significant prevalence of preterm labor at 14.82% among deliveries in the tertiary care hospital of Udupi district. The findings highlight key risk factors associated with preterm labor, including pregnancy-induced hypertension, medication intake, and conception at or above age 30. While previous abortion and hard physical work appeared as statistically preventive factors, they were not clinically significant. The use of prophylactic medications like Tibolone and Ceftriaxone was noted to increase the likelihood of preterm labor statistically, emphasizing the need for careful consideration in clinical settings.
These results underscore the importance of identifying and managing risk factors to minimize preterm births. Targeted interventions and vigilant prenatal care can help mitigate the physical, psychological, and economic burdens associated with preterm labor, ultimately improving maternal and neonatal health outcomes in the region. Further research with larger populations and longitudinal studies is recommended to refine the understanding of these risk factors and enhance preventive strategies.
The data from this study revealed that 14.82% (356 out of 2406) of deliveries were preterm. This finding aligns with a cross-sectional study conducted on the prevalence of preterm labor among young parturient women aged 15 – 24 years attending public hospitals in Brazil, which found a high prevalence of preterm labor (86.3% out of 2400 parturient women).5,6,11,24
Similarly, a retrospective study in Jordan identified the existence and reasons associated with preterm delivery, showing that all the preterm deliveries were approximately 647. Most neonates were female (54.9% Vs. 45.1%), and most (75.6%) were the second child. The women who delivered preterm were predominantly between 25 and 35.4,24–26
This study found associations between preterm labor and several factors, including age, residence, education level, occupation, marital status, gravida, number of deliveries, type of delivery, birth interval, blood group, and religion. However, no association was found between preterm labor and height or weight gain during pregnancy.
These findings are supported by a retrospective cross-sectional study on the prevalence of preterm labor in a Labor room, which identified risk factors for early labor such as active relationships during the previous week of labor, multiple pregnancies, small birth intervals between two conceptions, PIH, fetal anomaly, premature rupture of membrane, and Hypertension.8,13,27
A case-control study by Barbara Luke et al. in the United States on the relation between occupational factors and preterm delivery among nurses found that risk factors related to preterm delivery included working hours per week, different duty timings, standing hours, noisy areas, physical stress, and work-related stress (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2020).7,28–30
The results of this study and similar ones suggest that eliminating risk factors and reinforcing protective factors could help decrease the rate of preterm labor and its human and social burden.31,32 However, further studies with better design, such as cohort prospective studies with a proper follow-up period and large study population, are needed to determine these factors accurately. As the Hospital studied is a referral center for these patients, it represents the general population of the country to a great extent.11
The study identified a significant prevalence of preterm labor at 14.82% among deliveries in the tertiary care hospital of Udupi district. Key risk factors such as pregnancy-induced hypertension, medication intake, and conception at or above age 30 were significantly associated with preterm labor. The study’s findings align with other international studies, highlighting the global relevance of understanding and addressing these risk factors.33,34
Limitations of the Study
The cross-sectional and retrospective design limits the ability to establish causality.19 Conducted in a single tertiary care hospital, the findings may not be fully representative of the broader population, affecting generalizability. Recall bias from participants’ self-reported data can lead to inaccuracies. While several confounders were adjusted for, unmeasured factors might still influence the results. Measurement imprecision, particularly with gestational age, and potential selection bias if the sample is not representative are notable concerns. Loss to follow-up or missing data could also affect the robustness of the findings.
Generalisability of the Study Results
The findings from this study, conducted in a tertiary care hospital in Udupi district, may not be fully representative of other populations or settings due to several factors:
1. Population Characteristics: The specific demographics and healthcare practices in Udupi may differ from those in other regions, limiting broader applicability.
2. Healthcare Setting: The study’s single-center design may not reflect the diversity of other healthcare facilities.
3. Cultural and Regional Differences: Unique cultural, social, and environmental factors in the study location might affect generalizability.
4. Sample Size: A larger and more diverse population is needed to validate these findings.
5. Study Design: The cross-sectional and retrospective nature of the study limits its generalizability over time. Prospective studies with larger, multi-center populations are needed for robust results.
The researchers did consider fetal factors such as Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) and abnormal presentation in their analysis. However, they did not find any significant association between these factors and preterm birth. This outcome might be due to various reasons, including sample size limitations, variations in data quality, or the complex interplay of multiple factors influencing preterm birth. It highlights the need for further research with larger and more diverse populations to better understand the role of fetal factors in preterm births.
The study concludes that preterm labor is commonly seen in pregnant women who are exposed to non-modifiable and modifiable risk factors. Modifiable risk factors can be avoided and thus allow the pregnancy to continue till term. Non-modifiable risk factors need to be supervised very keenly so that there is no risk to the life of the mother and the fetus. It even states that the prevalence of preterm is higher among homemakers.35 Thus, these women need to be released from the level of stress to which they are exposed. All in all, the study concludes that these risk factors are different for each woman, which will lead to preterm labor, but they need to be identified at the earliest and treated adequately.
More information can be found on our data guidelines page. Data is available in the OSF web application: Contributors: Sweety Jousline Fernandes Identifier: https://osf.io/wp8xu/?view_only=da380485c7c74b20befc1e58f95fe431
Repository: Strobe checklist for ‘Prevalence and Risk factors associated with Preterm Labour’, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RBHXJ
The data collection for the study commenced only after obtaining prior ethical clearance from the departments, which are as listed below:
Administrative permission from Dean Manipal College of Manipal, to conduct the study.
Permission from IRC of Manipal College of Nursing Manipal for conducting the study (IRC148/2017)
Permission from IEC of Kasturba Hospital Manipal on 10/1/2018 (IEC 30/2018)
CTRI registration (CTRI/2018/05/014078) (its not a clinical trial but during this study duration it was insisted to register under clinical trial)
Permission from the OBG Department of Kasturba Hospital Manipal was obtained for the selection and utilizing the samples Records
Permission from the Medical Superintendent of the Kasturba Hospital Manipal, was obtained to have access to the Medical Record
Consent to participate written consent was obtained from the hospital authority and the MRD section to view the records. Based on the hospital numbers selected every day fifteen records were issued for the study assessment.
Principal Investigator: Mrs. Sweety J Fernandes (role: Recruitment, data collection, rater, intervention provider, concept analysis, training provider, and manuscript)
Guide: Dr Tessy Treesa Jose (Role: Intellectual inputs, mentoring)
Co–guide: Dr Judith A Noronha (Role: Intellectual, mentoring)
Co-investigator: Dr Sushmitha R Karkada (Role: Intellectual analysis)
Data is available in the OSF web application: Contributors: Sweety Jousline Fernandes Identifier: https://osf.io/wp8xu/?view_only=da380485c7c74b20befc1e58f95fe431, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RBHXJ.21
License: CC-By Attribution 4.0 International
I am grateful to the Hospital for permitting me to get access to the records and thankful to the co-investigators for their constant support and intellectual inputs.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: My main areas of research, particularly in pediatric otolaryngology include: infant & children feeding disorders, sleep-disordered breathing, dysphagia/swallowing difficulties, laryngopharyngeal reflux, and laryngomalacia. Preterm birth is a significant factor associated with conditions that are in my areas of research; respiratory-feeding-reflux-postural developmental issues in neonates-infant-to children.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Women's health. Neonatology, Teaching methodologies
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Women's health. Neonatology, Teaching methodologies
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 2 (revision) 17 Apr 25 |
read | read |
Version 1 11 Oct 24 |
read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)