ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Genome Note
Revised

A reference genome for the eastern bettong (Bettongia gaimardi)

[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
PUBLISHED 27 Jan 2025
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Genomics and Genetics gateway.

Abstract

Abstract

The eastern or Tasmanian bettong (Bettongia gaimardi) is one of four extant bettong species and is listed as ‘Near Threatened’ by the IUCN. We sequenced short read data on the 10x system to generate a reference genome 3.46Gb in size and contig N50 of 87.36Kb and scaffold N50 of 2.93Mb. Additionally, we used GeMoMa to provide and accompanying annotation for the reference genome. The generation of a reference genome for the eastern bettong provides a vital resource for the conservation of the species.

Keywords

Genome annotation, reference genome, bettong, marsupial

Revised Amendments from Version 1

We have addresses concerns from all reviewers and updated the manuscript to reflect these changes. Including, providing additional details of the sequencing and assembly methodology reflected by providing specific information on software used and the amount of data generated. We have also provided reasoning for the sequencing methods used but acknowledge the increase in genome quality that could be achieved by using long read technologies and sequencing multiple individuals.

See the authors' detailed response to the review by Jonathan J Hughes
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Naoki Osada
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Németh Attila

Introduction

The eastern or Tasmanian bettong (Bettongia gaimardi) is a small nocturnal Australian marsupial in the potoroid family and is considered an important ecosystem engineer due to its habit of digging and feeding on fungi (Munro et al. 2019, Ross et al. 2019a, 2019b). Eastern bettongs were once widespread across south-eastern Australia but are reported to have gone extinct on mainland Australia around the 1920’s due to predation from introduced carnivores and land clearing (Short 1998). Eastern bettongs are now confined to the eastern half of Tasmania where they are listed as ‘Near Threatened’ by the IUCN Red List (Burbidge et al. 2016).

Australia has experienced the highest extinction rate of mammals on any continent over the past 200 years, accounting for 28% of the world’s mammal extinctions since the year 1600 (McKenzie et al. 2007). Nationwide, a number of reintroduction programs are being implemented for the conservation of locally-extinct mammals, typically in the ‘critical weight range’ of 35 – 5500g (Burbidge and McKenzie 1989). In the case of the eastern bettong, the species was reintroduced from the state of Tasmania to two fenced reserves in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) between 2011 and 2012 (Batson et al. 2016).

The generation of a reference genome will provide a valuable resource in the management of the two reintroduced populations of eastern bettongs and contribute to the global effort to sequence all eukaryotic life on Earth (Lewin et al. 2022). To generate a reference genome, we sequenced DNA with 10x Genomics short reads and used GeMoMa to produce a genome annotation.

Methods

Sample collection and DNA/RNA extraction and sequencing

We used muscle tissue from a deceased male pouch young (B. gaimardi) individual collected from Mulligan’s Flat Woodland Sanctuary during population monitoring in 2014 and was frozen immediately after collection. The Sample was collected under Australian National University Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee ethics protocol A2011/017. DNA extraction used the QIAGEN Genomic Tips kit (Qiagen Catalogue # 10223) yielding 170ng/μl of DNA. Sequencing used the KAPA HyperPrep PCR free library kits (Roche Catalogue # KK8503) and two lanes of HiSeq Xten 150 bp PE sequencing (Illumina) at the Ramaciotti Centre for Genomics (UNSW, Sydney). Additional sequencing using the 10X Chromium Genomics library prep with >50 kb size selection was performed using 2 lanes of HiSeq Xten (150 bp PE) (Illumina). The sample was accessioned to the Australia Museum Accession number AM M.56404.

Genome assembly

Raw 10x data was assembled using Supernova v2.0.0 (RRID:SCR_016756) (Weisenfeld et al. 2017) with default settings and pseudohaplotype output. Haplotypes were tidied and filtered using Diploidocus v0.3.0 (RRID:SCR_021231) (Stuart et al. 2022), which filtered redundant and 100% unresolved scaffolds, and assigned the longest version of each scaffold to haplotype 1 [bettong.v1.0]. Scaffolds flagged as diploid (identical in both haplotypes) were then added back to haplotype 2 and each haplotype ran through Telociraptor v0.9.0 (https://github.com/slimsuite/telociraptor) to length-sort and rename scaffolds after modifying the ends to reveal telomeres, where appropriate [bettong.v1.1]. Scaffolds identified by Tiara v1.0.3 (Karlicki et al. 2022) as being from archaea, bacteria, prokarya or organelle were filtered, along with scaffolds flagged for exclusion or review by FCS-GX [bettong.v1.2] (Astashyn et al. 2023).

Completeness was estimated using Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologues (BUSCO, RRID:SCR_015008) v5.4.3 (Simao et al. 2015) using the mammalia_odb10 (n:9226) and vertebrata_odb10 datasets (n:3354).

Repetitive elements of the genome were identified, classified and masked using a Pawsey Supercomputing Centre Nimbus cloud machine (256GB RAM, 64 vCPU, 3 TB storage) by building a database using RepeatModeler v2.0.1 (RRID:SCR_015027) (Flynn et al. 2020) with default settings; repeats were then masked using RepeatMasker v4.0.9 (RRID:SCR_012954) (Smit et al. 2013-2015).

Genome annotation

A homology-based annotation was created independently for each haplotype using GeMoMa v1.9 (RRID:SCR_012954) (Keilwagen et al. 2019) using the annotation from nine Ensembl mammalian genomes (cow [Bos taurus], human [Homo sapiens], opossum [Monodelphis domestica], mouse [Mus musculus], Tammar wallaby [Macropus eugenii], platypus [Ornithorhynchus anatinus], koala [Phascolarctos cinereus], Tasmanian devil [Sarcophilus harrisii], wombat [Vombatus ursinus]) ( Table 1) and default settings. SAAGA v0.7.9 (https://github.com/slimsuite/saaga.git) was used to map annotated proteins onto a combined dataset of SwissProt (Edwards and Palopoli 2015, UniProt 2023) and Quest for Orthologues reference proteomes (Nevers et al. 2022) to add descriptions and extract the longest isoform per gene for completeness estimation using BUSCO v.5.4.3 (RRID:SCR_015008) in protein mode against the vertebrata_obd10 (n:3354) and mammalia_obd10 lineages (n:9226) (Simao et al. 2015).

Table 1. Assemblies used for GeMoMa annotations.

Common nameScientific nameAssembly IDReference
CowBos taurus ARS-UCD1.2(Rosen et al. 2020)
HumanHomo sapiens GRCh38.p13
OpossumMonodelphis domestica ASM229v1(Mikkelsen et al. 2007)
MouseMus musculus GRCm39
Tammar wallabyNotamacropus eugenii Meug_1.0(Renfree et al. 2011)
PlatypusOrnithorhynchus anatinus mOrnAna1.p.v.a(Zhou et al. 2021)
KoalaPhascolarctos cinereus phaCin_unsw_v4.1(Johnson et al. 2018)
Tasmanian devilSarcophilus harrisii mSarHar1.11(Stammnitz et al. 2023)
WombatVombatus ursinus bare-nosed_wombat_genome_assembly

The ‘genestats’ script (https://github.com/darencard/GenomeAnnotation) was used to obtain the average number of exons and introns and the average exon and intron length.

Results

Genome assembly

Sequencing generated 185M reads of short read data and 149M reads of 10× Genomics data. Genome assembly with Supernova estimated a 3.79 Gb genome size (46.88X raw coverage) and assembled a 3.57 Gb genome in 38,249 scaffolds (scaffold N50=2.77 Mb) (Silver 2024). Following Diploidocus cleanup, there were 27,408 primary scaffolds (3.46 Gb) with 1,681 alternative scaffolds (3.01 Gb). Telociraptor made five inversions and trimmed one contig. Contamination removal filtered 786 scaffolds (2.00 Mb) from each haplotype. This gave a final genome size of 3.46 Gb with 26,623 scaffolds ( Table 2). The genome size is comparable to that of other marsupial genomes, including that of the closely related woylie (Bettongia penicillate ogilbyi) (Haouchar et al. 2016, Peel et al. 2021). BUSCO completeness of the final genome was 92.2% for mammalia_odb10 and over 96.9% for vertebrata_odb10 (96.8% for haplotype two) ( Table 2). Whilst the BUSCO scores suggest a highly complete genome, the use of long read data such as PacBio or Oxford Nanopore would assist in increasing the contiguity of the assembly. Additionally, 53.08% of the genome was identified as repeats, which is similar to other marsupials, including the closely related woylie (53.05%) (Peel et al. 2021) ( Table 3).

Table 2. Genome assembly statistics of the eastern bettong (Bettongia gaimardi) bettong.v1.2hap1 assembly.

Metric
Assembly size (Gb)3.46
Number of contigs91,460
Contig N50 (kb)87.36
Contig N90 (kb)64.48
Contig L5011,569
Contig L9017,470
Longest contig (kb)956.31
GC content (%)38.65
Number of Scaffolds26,623
Scaffold N50 (Mb)2.93
Scaffold N90 (Mb)2.21
Scaffold L50358
Scaffold L90524
Longest Scaffold (Mb)15.08
Complete vertebrata_odb10 BUSCOs96.9% (Single copy: 92.9%, Duplicated: 4.0%)
Fragmented vertebrata_odb10 BUSCOs2.0%
Missing vertebrata_odb10 BUSCOs1.1%
Complete mammalia_odb10 BUSCOs92.2% (Single copy: 89.4%, Duplicated: 2.8%)
Fragmented mammalia_odb10 BUSCOs1.8%
Missing mammalia_odb10 BUSCOs6.0%
Gaps (%)1.44

Table 3. Classification of repeat elements of the eastern bettong (Bettongia gaimardi) genome assembly.

Repeat elementNumber of elements % of sequence
SINEs2,091,7308.91
ALUs19,9680.10
MIRs2,069,1058.08
LINES3,10,048633.21
LINE11,049,71019.2
LINE21,146,4827.49
L3/CR1563,6843.09
LTR elements74,4850.8
ERVL15,0490.18
ERV Class I23,4960.23
ERV Class II23,6170.28
DNA elements761,3932.67
hAT-Charlie 154,9680.72
TcMar-Tigger 41,1110.23
Unclassified1,179,1217.5
Total interspersed repeats1,836,063,741bp53.08
Small RNA6530
Satellites23,6090.13

Genome annotation

Genome annotation with GeMoMa predicted 36,068 and 36,015 protein coding genes for haplotype one and two, respectively, which is a large over-estimation with other marsupials having around 20,000 protein coding genes (Johnson et al. 2018, Brandies et al. 2020). In the future, generating transcriptomes for a variety of eastern bettong tissues would likely improve the accuracy of the annotation. The annotation is highly complete with 94.1% of mammalian protein BUSCOs complete ( Table 4). The average protein length was 384.3 and 384.7 amino acids for haplotype one and two, respectively, with an average of 6.52 exons per gene ( Table 4). On average, predicted proteins were 87.8% the length of their best SwissProt/QFO hit, suggesting some fragmentation of the annotation, which might be inflating the numbers of annotated genes.

Table 4. Statistics of the annotation of the eastern bettong (Bettongia gaimardi).

Metrics
Annotation
Complete vertebrata_odb10 BUSCOs97.3% (Single copy: 93.9%, Duplicated: 3.4%)
Fragmented vertebrata_odb10 BUSCOs1.6%
Missing vertebrata_odb10 BUSCOs1.1%
Complete mammalia_odb10 BUSCOs94.1% (Single copy: 91.5%, Duplicated: 2.6%)
Fragmented mammalia_odb10 BUSCOs1.7%
Missing mammalia_odb10 BUSCOs4.2%
Average number of exons per gene6.52
Average Protein Length (aa)384.3/384.7 haplotype 1/haplotype 2

Ethical considerations

Samples were collected under Australian National University Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee ethics protocol A2011/017 (Approved 2011, expired Dec 2014). The sample was collected in during trapping in 2014.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 20 Dec 2024
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Silver LW, Edwards RJ, Neaves L et al. A reference genome for the eastern bettong (Bettongia gaimardi) [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2025, 13:1544 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.157851.2)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 2
VERSION 2
PUBLISHED 27 Jan 2025
Revised
Views
4
Cite
Reviewer Report 28 Jan 2025
Németh Attila, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary 
Approved
VIEWS 4
Dear Author(s),


I ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Attila N. Reviewer Report For: A reference genome for the eastern bettong (Bettongia gaimardi) [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2025, 13:1544 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.177228.r362834)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 20 Dec 2024
Views
10
Cite
Reviewer Report 17 Jan 2025
Németh Attila, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 10
Dear Editor(s),
Dear Authors,

I am sending below my comments on Manuscript, entitled "A reference genome for the eastern bettong (Bettongia gaimardi)," which was submitted for publication in the journal F1000Research.

I find ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Attila N. Reviewer Report For: A reference genome for the eastern bettong (Bettongia gaimardi) [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2025, 13:1544 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.173363.r351906)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 27 Jan 2025
    Luke Silver, The University of Sydney School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Camperdown, 2006, Australia
    27 Jan 2025
    Author Response
    1. Why was the reference genome based on a sample from only one individual? It is not an endangered species, so what was the reasoning behind this choice?
    ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 27 Jan 2025
    Luke Silver, The University of Sydney School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Camperdown, 2006, Australia
    27 Jan 2025
    Author Response
    1. Why was the reference genome based on a sample from only one individual? It is not an endangered species, so what was the reasoning behind this choice?
    ... Continue reading
Views
8
Cite
Reviewer Report 14 Jan 2025
Jonathan J Hughes, University of California, Riverside, USA 
Approved
VIEWS 8
The authors describe a whole-genome assembly generated with 10X sequencing for the eastern bettong, an ecologically important marsupial of conservation concern.  They report their protocols for extraction, sequencing, QC, and annotation. The manuscript is clearly written and the methodology is ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Hughes JJ. Reviewer Report For: A reference genome for the eastern bettong (Bettongia gaimardi) [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2025, 13:1544 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.173363.r351899)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 27 Jan 2025
    Luke Silver, The University of Sydney School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Camperdown, 2006, Australia
    27 Jan 2025
    Author Response
    1. State the parameters used when running any given software. If only default parameters were used for all software, then state that.
      We have stated in the methods
    ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 27 Jan 2025
    Luke Silver, The University of Sydney School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Camperdown, 2006, Australia
    27 Jan 2025
    Author Response
    1. State the parameters used when running any given software. If only default parameters were used for all software, then state that.
      We have stated in the methods
    ... Continue reading
Views
20
Cite
Reviewer Report 08 Jan 2025
Naoki Osada, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan 
Approved
VIEWS 20
This manuscript presents the results of whole-genome sequencing and assembly of Bettongia gaimardi. The authors conducted genome assembly,
quality evaluation, and annotation, including repetitive sequence annotation. I have verified that the assembled genome sequence and raw
data are ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Osada N. Reviewer Report For: A reference genome for the eastern bettong (Bettongia gaimardi) [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2025, 13:1544 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.173363.r351903)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 27 Jan 2025
    Luke Silver, The University of Sydney School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Camperdown, 2006, Australia
    27 Jan 2025
    Author Response
    Reviewer Comment: In the abstract, showing scaffold N50 would be helpful.
    Author Response: We have added in the scaffold N50 value to the abstract

    Reviewer Comment: In the Introduction section, ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 27 Jan 2025
    Luke Silver, The University of Sydney School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Camperdown, 2006, Australia
    27 Jan 2025
    Author Response
    Reviewer Comment: In the abstract, showing scaffold N50 would be helpful.
    Author Response: We have added in the scaffold N50 value to the abstract

    Reviewer Comment: In the Introduction section, ... Continue reading

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 20 Dec 2024
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.