Keywords
Climate Change Denial, Terror Management Theory, Political Orientation.
This article is included in the Political Communications gateway.
This article is included in the Climate gateway.
Climate change denial (CCD) has been found to be more pronounced among individuals with a conservative political orientation. Terror Management Theory posits that an individual’s worldview serves as a primary defense mechanism in coping with existential threats, such as the reality of climate change. Drawing on these premises, we conducted preliminary research investigating the impact of death priming on CCD from the Terror management theory perspective.
We administered a death priming task and measured CCD in its immediate wake or following a delay task. We confirmed among 219 Amazon’s MTurk participants that immediately following death priming, CCD was reduced among all participants. In the delayed death priming condition, we acquired preliminary evidence that CCD was heightened among Republican participants.
These findings demonstrate the relevance of death priming to CCD tendencies and potentially spawn future research regarding CCD as a particular form of coping with existential threats.
Climate Change Denial, Terror Management Theory, Political Orientation.
The study was approved by the Bar Ilan University Psychology Department ethics committee on November 7th, 2022 (approval number 31\2022). For this preregistered study (https://osf.io/7ny2g), we recruited 219 participants on Amazon’s MTurk (129 men, M age = 42.52 years, SD = 10.60). Participation was restricted to United States residents who defined their political inclination as either Democrat or Republican (for additional details regarding demographics, see Table 1). To eliminate unreliable data, we removed from the data set entries with 50% and above of missing values. Other flags for eliminating data included clear response set patterns as well as unreasonably short durations of survey completion. While this process may have resulted in the removal of some genuine participants, we erred on the side of caution given the importance of data quality. Considering the sample size and an estimated effect size of 0.25, we had the power of 0.76 as determined by an a priori power analysis (G*Power; Faul et al., 2007, https://www.psychologie.hhu.de/arbeitsgruppen/allgemeine-psychologie-und-arbeitspsychologie/gpower).
Mortality salience. We used a 15-item true/false questionnaire to prime thoughts of death (Templer, 1970). This approach has been utilized successfully in a previous TMT studie conducted via the Amazon’s MTurk (Boyd et al., 2020). Participants were randomly assigned to answer questions about dying (e.g., “I am very much afraid to die”) or parallel questions about experiencing pain (e.g., “I am very much afraid of being in pain”), which served as the control. As in other research, merely responding to the questions related to death (in contrast to pain) constitutes the mortality salience prime. Therefore, responses to the prompts were not examined.
Climate change denial (CCD). We measured climate change denial with an established 16-item scale (Häkkinen & Akrami, 2014). The scale captures mainly the denial of climate change’s seriousness and the denial of human involvement (e.g., “Warming of the Earth’s climate is natural and does not depend on human influence”). Responses are on a 6-point scale (1 = do not agree to 6 = agree). After reversing the scale of five items, a total score was computed by averaging the 16 items, with higher scores reflecting higher CCD. In the current sample, Cronbach’s α was 0.85.
After signing the consent form participants completed the priming task. Then they filled the CCD scale immediately after the prime task or after a five-minute delay task consisting of a word puzzle. Following the CCD, participants filled out a demographic questionnaire, probing their age, gender, political orientation and activeness (self-report from zero to seven), education, employment, and income. Overall, the session lasted between 5 and 10 minutes, depending on whether participants completed the delay task. All research conditions were administered and randomized with the Qualtrics software platform (Qualtrics XM: The Leading Experience Management Software).
We conducted a three-way ANOVA with prime type (mortality or pain), delay task (with or without) and political orientation (Democrat or Republican) as factors. CCD score was the independent measure.
Results indicated a main effect regarding political orientation, F (1,211) = 41.45, p = 0. 000, η2 = 0.16; as documented in previous CCD research, in the current sample CCD was significantly higher among Republican participants (M = 3.70; 95% CI [3.53, 3.86], SD = 0.93) in contrast to Democrat participants (M = 2.89; 95% CI [2.70, 3.07], SD = 0.95).
A significant two-way interaction between the prime type and the delay task was also found; F (1,211) = 4.95, p = 0. 027, η2 = 0.02. According to our hypotheses, we conducted follow-up analysis for each task condition (with or without a delay task corresponding to distal and proximal defenses, respectively). These analyses indicated that the interaction source was from the no delay group, F (1, 107) = 4.64, p = 0.033, η2 = 0.04). CCD scores in the death condition were lower (M = 3.37; 95% CI [3.16, 3.57], SD = 0.71) than in the pain condition (M = 3.69; 95% CI [3.47, 3.90], SD = 0.85), indicating a reduction in CCD due to death priming in the proximal defense condition.
The three-way interaction was insignificant (p = 0.359). However, as can be seen in Figure 1, following the death prime in the distal condition Republican participants displayed a distinct CCD increase in accordance with our hypothesis. Therefore, we conducted among Republican participants an additional two-way ANOVA with prime type and the delay task as independent variables and CCD as the dependent variable. Only when adding political activeness (r = -.31 with CCD, see Table 1) as a covariate did this analysis achieve significance. F (1,109) = 9.20, p = 0. 003, η2 = 0.08. In the proximal group, the prime effect, although similar to the overall proximal effect reported above, did not achieve significance; F (1, 62) = 2.42, p = 0.125). However, the distal effect was significant; F (1, 46) = 5.99, p = 0.018, η2 = 0.115). CCD scores in the death condition were higher (M = 4.01; 95% CI [3.62, 4.41], SD = 0.68) than in the pain condition (M = 3.41; 95% CI [3.08, 3.73], SD = 1.08), indicating an increase in CCD due to death priming within the distal defense mode among Republican participants.
Figure 1 alt text: Among republican participants while in the proximal condition death priming reduced CCD, in the distal condition it increased it.
Notably, political activeness (PA) was overall higher among Republican participants (M = 3.86, SD = 2.00), in contrast to Democratic participants (M = 3.05, SD = 1.90, t(208) = 2.97, p = 0.003, d = 0.41). In turn, undermining the randomness of participant distribution regarding political orientation (see Table 2 for descriptive statistics regarding CCD and political activeness among Republican participants).
Three main findings were observed in the current study. First, as documented in previous research, beyond the prime type and the delay task variables CCD was higher among Republican participants than Democrat participants. Furthermore, in the immediate wake of mortality priming CCD was reduced among all participants (the proximal defense effect). Finally, following death priming and a delay task, CCD increased among Republican participants when controlling for PA (the distal defense effect).
Indeed, the proximal effect suggests that death priming operates as a tool for CCD reduction when existential threat is in focal attention. Accumulating TMT research has underscored that while individuals attentionally avoid existential threat when it is abstract and does not pose an immediate threat, their focal attention gravitates toward it when perceived to pose an immediate threat (Hirschberger et al., 2010; Gerber & Anaki, 2018; Gerber et al., 2023). Applying this dynamic to CCD, as the climate crisis transforms from a futuristic abstract threat into an occurring reality, death priming may be an effective tool for facilitating climate action tendencies accordingly. Notably, the CCD scale used in the current study was a rather abstract perception of climate change, as the nature of self-report scales tends to be. Future research should investigate whether the impact of death priming on CCD is more pronounced when the perception of climate change is based on more concrete stimuli such as visceral images.
Finding a preliminary distal effect among Republicans (only when controlling for PA) sheds an important light on the general tendency for CCD among conservative individuals. Seemingly, this tendency, has been considered primarily to reflect conservative individuals’ benefit from maintaining the economic status quo and existing institutional order (Norgaard, 2019; Clarke et al., 2019). The distal effect finding that the tendency for CCD among Republican participants was facilitated by death priming, supports a differential understanding; Rather than a general anthropocentric attitude of dominance over nature (Jylhä & Akrami, 2015), CCD reflects conservative individuals need to cope with an existential threat, reflected in the ramifications of climate change, to their worldview and way of life. This line of investigation is warranted and should be pursued in future research to affirm mutual recognition and common ground for promoting climate change mitigation and adaptation.
Before concluding, one must consider the overall limitations of the current study which is preliminary and exploratory in its nature. Notably, this study was conducted among US residents only, reflecting a particular political environment in time and place. Therefore, its convergence with CCD investigations conducted among samples from other world regions is limited. Moreover, although theoretically sound, the distal effect found among Republicans only when controlling for PA should be treated only as a warrant for future, more powered research. Notably, increased PA levels among Republicans in contrast to Democrats may be attributed in part to it’s being measured following mortality salience. Indeed, mortality salience has been shown to arouse PA among conservative individuals as an expression of their distal defenses (Schindler et al. 2023). Finally, PA’s mean differences patterns among Republicans (Table 2) as well as its overall covariance with CCD (Table 1), indicate that PA should be theoretically considered regarding the impact of mortality priming on CCD in future studies. To conclude, the value of the current research is primarily in being conducive to additional research regarding the psychological aspects of CCD. Indeed, the dynamics of coping with existential threats should be an additional perspective in examining CCD tendencies.
The research data set is publicly available at the OSF depository (https://osf.io/v9g7s; Gerber, 2024; DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/V9G7S).
This project contains following dataset:
OSF _ Climate Change Denial
This is in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication) (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/).
The research questionnaires and an example of the word puzzle delay task are publicly available at the OSF depository (https://osf.io/v9g7s).
This is in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication) (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/).
As mentioned above, all research conditions were administered and randomized with the third party priority software Qualtrics platform ( Qualtrics XM: The Leading Experience Management Software). The outcome data file was analyzed with the third party priority software IBM statistics 22 (IBM SPSS Statistics).
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Interdisciplinary climate communication; Climate emotions; Pro-environmental behaviour change
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Environmental Management
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 03 Jul 24 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)