ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article
Revised

Morphological And Morphometric analysis of Human External Ear with Its Implications in Sex and Stature Estimation -– A Preliminary Observational Study

[version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
Previously titled: Morphology And Morphometry of Human External Ear with Its Significance in Sex Determination and Stature Estimation - An Observational Study
PUBLISHED 15 May 2025
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Manipal Academy of Higher Education gateway.

Abstract

Background

The human ear is unique to individuals, and ear prints, like fingerprints, are discrete enough to distinguish identical twins. Thus, this study aimed to estimate the stature and sex using various morphometric parameters and morphological features of the external ear for forensic identification.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional observational study involving 40 participants recruited using simple random sampling technique. Eighteen measurements were taken, and various morphological features were noted for both the right and left ears. A digital Vernier caliper was used to measure all linear parameters. The angles were measured using a goniometer. Normal distribution was verified using the Shapiro–Wilk test. For normally distributed parameters, an independent t-test was used, and for non-normally distributed parameters, the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare sexes. To compare the right and left parameters, independent t-tests (for normally distributed data) and Mann-Whitney U tests (for non-normally distributed data) were applied. Sex determination and stature estimation were performed using logistic regression analysis.

Results

In males and females, the most common shape was oval (47.5%), and the ear lobe was free (45%). When comparing the parameters of males on the right and left sides, it was noticed that only the ear inclination angle and concha mastoid angle showed significant differences (p < 0.05). It was seen that the right lobe width showed perfect separation, indicating its potential as an extremely reliable predictor of sex. It was noted that in females, the strongest correlation with height was with the ear inclination angle on both sides.

Conclusion

We can conclude from the results of this study that the right lobe width of external ear can be a reliable predictor of sex. Ear inclination angle on both sides showed strongest correlation with height. The results of this study can help forensic anthropologists identify the sex and stature of a person from various ear measurements in young South Indian adults.

Keywords

Morphology, Morphometry, Sex, External Ear, Regression Equation, Stature

Revised Amendments from Version 2

We have emphasized that results are applicable only to young South Indian adults in the Abstract, Discussion and Conclusion.
We have state in limitations that due to small sample size results are preliminary and exploratory, and that larger studies are needed to validate these regression models and confirm predictors.
We have included a ROC curve as Figure 5 to show logistic regression analysis of ear morphometric predictors for gender. 

Minor Revisions:
We have done a light grammar across the manuscript.
We have deleted the Duplicate or Misplaced Text and formatted the test for the statistical table text
Figures 1–4 we have added more descriptive captions to be interpretable on their own.
We have added 3 more publications in the references after 2020.
We have added the landmarks in the images.
We have added the values of males and females measurement in table 4.
We have changed the title of the study to “Morphological And Morphometric analysis of Human External Ear with Its Implications in Sex and Stature Estimation -– A Preliminary Observational Study”
Added some quantitative data in the results in abstract.
Added which specific measurements were most useful in our study in Conclusion also.

See the authors' detailed response to the review by Adil Asghar
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Nurdan Sezgin
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Anyanwu Godson Emeka

Introduction

Personal identification implies a determination of individualism established on specified morphological criteria that are distinctive to that person. In the circumstance of skeletal remnants, identification is very complex and needs precise investigation of these remnants.1 Human beings present a wide range of variations which are distinctive and facilitate differentiating a person from another.2

In addition to DNA profiling, several morphological traits and biometric parameters have been used in forensic analyses to differentiate one individual from another. Certain structural attributes used for this purpose include fingerprints, facial traits, footprints and external ear.35

As earprints, like fingerprints, are distinct enough, even the human ear can be used to recognize identical twins as it is unique to individuals.68

The external ear is the most definitive feature of the human face, also referred to as the pinna or auricle.2 Many forensic anthropologists revealed that auricle plays a vital role in identification of gender, stature, age and ethnicity.9 Additionally, the shape, location and measurement of the auricle are specific to everyone same as the fingerprint thus assisting its utilization in forensics.2 Frequently, during a crime scene investigation ear inscriptions are typically found on gates and windows where a possible criminal has been hearing for likely assault. Therefore, such spots are gathered and assessed using saved records to determine a match with the accused. Therefore, earprints provide valuable forensic evidence.10 When an accused person wears protective hand gloves, his fingerprints will not be available during those cases, and ear morphology and biometrics are frequently used.11

Ear morphology and morphometry are more important than typical biometric attributes such as facial recognition because they are rarely affected by aging. However, it is not affected by the facial expression alterations. In addition, there is no effect of anxiety on the ear as it can happen in other traits such as the retina and the iris.12,13 Hence, the ear is used widely as a forensic tool for individual identification purposes because of its permanency and distinctiveness in persons after birth to maturity.14

It has been found that sex can be identified by ear measurements with up to 69.3% precision in male individuals and 72% in females.9 Previous studies have shown that estimation of stature and sexual dimorphism can be done using morphologic parameters of the ear like ear length, width, ear lobular length and width.15,16

Very few studies have been conducted on human ear morphometry and morphology in the South Indian Population. Therefore, this study was conducted to estimate stature, assess sexual dimorphism, and racial specificity based on the morphometry and morphology of the external ear in the South Indian population and to derive a regression equation to predict sex and stature estimation for forensic identification.

Methods

Study type: Observational study

Institutional ethical approval was obtained from the Kasturba Medical College and Kasturba Hospital Institutional Ethics Committee on 31st May 31, 2024, before starting the research. (IEC NO – IEC2 – 113/2024).

Written informed consent was obtained from the participants before collecting their data and for publication of their images as per the informed consent form template obtained from the ‘Kasturba Medical College and Kasturba Hospital Institutional Ethics Committee.’

We used the STROBE Reporting Guidelines for our study; a complete checklist is available under the Reporting Guidelines.17

Study Period: The current research was carried out from June 2024 to October 2024.

Study location: Department of Anatomy.

Sample Size: 40 (sample size computation using effect size, d = 0.5; significance level = 0.05; power = 0.8; sample size, n = 40; i.e., 20 males and 20 females).

Study population: 18-25yrs.

Inclusion criteria:

  • Subjects without any ear deformity.

  • Only young individuals of 18-25 yrs were included.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Subjects having ear deformity.

  • Subjects below 18 and above 25 were eliminated from the research.

Detailed description of procedure/processes:

Measurements were taken with the subject’s head in the Frankfort horizontal plane.

The following measurements were taken: ( Figures 1 and 2).

9e59ebee-1b7c-4fea-9b50-1baca48abb0a_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Linear measurements done on the ear - A. Ear length and width, lobule height and width, morphological ear length, tragus length, concha length and width. B. Helical mastoid distal length and thickness of ear lobe.

9e59ebee-1b7c-4fea-9b50-1baca48abb0a_figure2.gif

Figure 2. Angular measurements done on the ear - A. Auricular inclination angle. B. Concha mastoid angle. C. Antihelical take-off angle.

1) Ear length: It was determined as the distance between the most dependent part of the lobule to the superior end of the auricle.

2) Ear Width: It was determined as the distance between the root of the ear to the helix where concavity is maximum.

3) Lobule height: It was measured as the distance from the intertragic notch to the most dependent part of the lobule.

4) Lobule width: It was determined as the maximal distance across the lobule taken transversely.

5) Concha length: It was determined as the distance from the intertragic notch to the superior aspect of the concha.

6) Concha width: It was determined as the distance from point where helix concavity is maximum to the posterior aspect of tragus.

7) Tragus length: Length between intertragic notch to tragion.

8) Morphological ear length: It was determined as the straight distance between the otobasion superior and the otobasion inferior.

9) Helical mastoid distal length: the distance from the mastoid process to the helix rim at the most posterior level of the superior auricular rim.

10) Thickness of ear lobe.

11) Auricular inclination angle: The angle measured between the length of the ear and the vertical.

12) Antihelical take off angle: The angle measured as the antihelix projects from the concha bowl.

13) Concha mastoid angle: The angle measured between the mastoid process and the concha bowl.

14) Auricular index = ear width ÷ ear length × 100.

15) Lobular index = lobular width ÷ lobular length × 100.

16) Concha index = concha width ÷ concha length × 100.

17) Ear attachment length index = morphological ear length ÷ ear length × 100.

18) Conchal bowl depth.

Tools used: A digital Vernier caliper with a precision of 0.001 mm was used to measure all parameters. The angles were measured using a goniometer. To avoid intra- and inter-observer bias, each measurement was independently performed twice by two observers, and its average was recorded afterwards.

In addition to these morphometric measurements various morphological parameters were also noted down:

  • 1. Ear Shape: Round, oval, triangular and rectangular.

  • 2. Attachment of ear lobe: free, partially attached and fully attached.

  • 3. Shape of ear lobe: arch, square, tongue and triangular.

  • 4. Form of helix: rolled, wide, flat and concave marginal.

  • 5. Shape of ear tragus: knob, round and long.

  • 6. Shape of Darwin’s tubercle: projected, enlarged and nodosity.

Statistical analysis

The data were evaluated using Jamovi 2.4 computer software.18 Normal distribution was verified using the Shapiro–Wilk test. For normally distributed parameters, an independent t-test was used, and for non-normally distributed parameters, the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare sexes. To compare the right and left parameters, independent t-tests (for normally distributed data) and Mann-Whitney U tests (for non-normally distributed data) were applied. Sex determination and stature estimation were performed using logistic regression analysis.

Underlying data is included in the Underlying Data section.19

Results

Morphological parameters

Ear shape

In males, the most common shape was oval in 10 (50%), followed by triangular in 5 (25%), round in 3 (15%), and rectangular in 2 (10%). In females, the most common shape was oval 9 (45%), followed by triangular 5 (25%), round 4 (20%) and rectangular 2 (10%) ( Figure 3).

9e59ebee-1b7c-4fea-9b50-1baca48abb0a_figure3.gif

Figure 3. A. Shapes of the ear - Rectangular, triangular, oval and round. B. Attachments of ear lobe- Fully attached, partially attached and free. C. Shapes of ear tragus- Knob shaped, round and long.

Attachment of ear lobe

In males, the most common ear lobe was free in 10 cases (50%), followed by partially attached in 7 (35%), and fully attached in 3 (15%) cases. In females, the most common ear lobe was free in 8 cases (40%), followed by partially attached and fully attached in 6 (30% each) cases ( Figure 3).

Shape of ear lobe

In males, the most common shape was arched 10 (50%), followed by triangular 6 (30%), square 3 (15%), and tongue-shaped 1 (5%). In females, the most common shape was triangular (n = 7, 35%), followed by arched (n = 6, 30%), square (n = 5; 25%), and tongue-shaped (n = 2; 10%) ( Figure 4).

9e59ebee-1b7c-4fea-9b50-1baca48abb0a_figure4.gif

Figure 4. A. Shapes of ear lobe- Arched, square, tongue shaped and triangular. B. Forms of helix- Concave marginal, wide, rolled and flat. C. Shapes of Darwin’s tubercle- Nodosity, enlarged and projected.

Form of helix

In males most common form of helix was concave marginal 9 (45%), followed by wide 5 (25%), flat and rolled 3 (15% each). In females most common form of helix was concave marginal 7 (35%), followed by flat 5 (25%), wide and rolled 4 (20% each) ( Figure 4).

Shape of ear tragus

In males, the most common tragus was round 12 (60%), followed by 5 (25%), and 3 (15%). In females, the most common shape of the tragus was long 9 (45%), followed by round 7 (35%), and knob shaped 4 (20%) ( Figure 3).

Shape of Darwin’s tubercle

In males, the most common shape of Darwin’s tubercle was enlarged by 10 (50%), followed by projected 8 (40%) and nodosity 2 (10%). In females, the most common shape of Darwin’s tubercle was enlarged in nine (45%), followed by projected seven (35%), and nodosity in four (20%) cases ( Figure 4).

Morphometric parameters

Comparing the parameters on the right and left sides, it was noticed that lobe height (p-value-0.038), ear inclination angle (p-value-0.002), antihelical takeoff angle (p-value-0.045), and concha mastoid angle (p-value-0.011) showed significant differences (p-value <0.05). The other parameters were not statistically significant.

Table 1. Descriptive statistics of right and left side with their comparison using Mann-Whitney test (non-normally distributed data) and independent T Test (normally distributed data).

ParametersMean ± SD P value
Ear length (mm)Right63.2 ± 7.860.381
Left62.3 ± 7.77
Ear width (mm)Right30.0 ± 2.850.411
Left29.4 ± 3.05
Lobe height (mm)Right25.2 ± 2.200.038*
Left24.2 ± 2.37
Lobe width (mm)Right21.8 ± 4.210.758
Left21.6 ± 4.08
Concha length (mm)Right14.5 ± 2.300.881
Left14.5 ± 2.12
Concha width (mm)Right14.0 ± 1.780.860
Left14.0 ± 1.82
Morphological ear length (mm)Right32.4 ± 2.780.299
Left31.8 ± 2.17
Concha bowl depth (mm)Right11.3 ± 1.980.602
Left11.0 ± 1.88
Helical mastoid distal length (mm)Right16.3 ± 1.440.099
Left15.7 ± 1.38
Tragus length (mm)Right15.4 ± 2.400.405
Left15.1 ± 2.37
Thickness of ear lobe (mm)Right7.14 ± 1.070.362
Left6.94 ± 0.91
Auricular indexRight48.0 ± 6.070.617
Left47.5 ± 5.71
Lobular indexRight87.3 ± 18.10.545
Left89.7 ± 17.4
Concha indexRight97.4 ± 9.500.989
Left97.4 ± 11.4
Ear attachment length indexRight185 ± 8.400.996
Left168 ± 7.33
Ear inclination angle (°)Right15.1 ± 0.770.002*
Left14.6 ± 0.81
Antihelical take off angle (°)Right24.8 ± 1.430.045*
Left24.2 ± 1.36
Concha mastoid angle (°)Right88.7 ± 1.630.011*
Left87.9 ± 1.65

* P value < 0.05-Significant.

Table 2. Descriptive statistics of female parameters with their right and left comparison using Mann-Whitney test (non-normally distributed data) and independent T Test (normally distributed data).

ParametersMean± SD
LeftRight P value
Ear length68.4 ± 2.2669.5 ± 2.110.096
Ear width30.9 ± 2.6731.2 ± 2.490.737
Lobe height24.8 ± 2.3925.2 ± 1.740.291
Lobe width25.2 ± 2.1425.7 ± 1.990.515
Concha length16.0 ± 1.7916.3 ± 1.770.569
Concha width14.5 ± 2.0415.1 ± 1.750.285
Morphological ear length33.4 ± 1.3534.8 ± 1.360.002*
Concha bowl depth12.6 ± 1.0512.9 ± 1.060.368
Helical mastoid distal length15.2 ± 1.4815.8 ± 1.720.236
Tragus length15.5 ± 1.5716.0 ± 1.780.357
Thickness of ear lobe7.47 ± 0.8987.88 ± 0.8780.152
Auricular index45.2 ± 3.1044.8 ± 3.000.718
Lobular index103 ± 13.9102 ± 11.10.738
Concha index90.7 ± 7.0093.1 ± 6.250.259
Ear attachment length48.8 ± 2.4850.1 ± 2.860.326
Ear inclination angle14.8 ± 0.92715.4 ± 0.8860.060
Anti helical take of angle25.2 ± 0.83425.8 ± 0.9120.055
Concha mastoid angle88.3 ± 1.4588.8 ± 1.560.158

* P value < 0.05-Significant.

When comparing the parameters of females on the right and left sides, it was noticed that only the morphological ear length (p=0.002) showed significant differences (p<0.05). The other parameters were not statistically significant.

Table 3. Descriptive statistics of male parameters with their right and left comparison using Mann-Whitney test (non-normally distributed data) and independent T Test (normally distributed data).

ParametersMean ± SD
Median (Min-Max)
LeftRight P value
Ear length56.2 ± 6.4356.9 ± 6.130.758
Ear width28.0 ± 2.7028.8 ± 2.720.348
Lobe height23.7 ± 2.2825.2 ± 2.630.065
Lobe width18.0 ± 1.5418.0 ± 1.190.933
Concha length13.0 ± 1.1512.8 ± 1.170.787
Concha width13.5 ± 1.4312.9 ± 0.9380.190
Morphological ear length30.3 ± 1.7230.0 ± 1.490.617
Concha bowl depth9.48 ± 1.049.62 ± 1.140.626
Helical mastoid distal length16.3 ± 1.0116.8 ± 0.8750.083
Tragus length14.7 ± 2.9614.8 ± 2.830.850
Thickness of ear lobe6.41 ± 0.5756.41 ± 0.6560.992
Auricular index49.7 ± 6.8251.1 ± 6.770.253
Lobular index76.6 ± 8.1772.1 ± 8.170.093
Concha index104 ± 11.1102 ± 10.30.482
Ear attachment length54.5 ± 6.8253.4 ± 6.530.626
Ear inclination angle14.3 ± 0.61514.9 ± 0.5720.004*
Anti helical take of angle23.2 ± 1.0123.9 ± 1.250.077
Concha mastoid angle87.6 ± 1.8288.6 ± 1.730.033*

* P value < 0.05-Significant.

When comparing the parameters of males on the right and left sides, it was noticed that only the ear inclination angle (p=0.004) and concha mastoid angle (p=0.033) showed significant differences (p<0.05). The other parameters were not statistically significant.

A comparison of parameters between males and females is shown in Table 4. When comparing various parameters between males and females, it is observed that the following measurements were not significantly different: lobe height (right: p-value = 0.970, left: p-value = 0.162), concha width (left: p-value = 0.071), tragus length (right: p-value = 0.135, left: p-value = 0.316), ear attachment length (right: p-value = 0.318, left: p-value = 0.335), ear inclination angle (right: p-value = 0.053, left: p-value = 0.059), and concha mastoid angle (right: p-value = 0.753, left: p-value = 0.218). All other parameters were found to be significantly different, with p-values less than 0.05.

Table 4. Comparison of male and female parameters using independent T-Test.

ParametersMalesFemales P value
Ear length right56.9 ± 6.1369.5 ± 2.11<.001*
Ear length left56.2 ± 6.4368.4 ± 2.26<.001*
Ear width right28.8 ± 2.7231.2 ± 2.490.005*
Ear width left28.0 ± 2.7030.9 ± 2.67.001*
Lobe height right25.2 ± 2.6325.2 ± 1.740.970
Lobe height left23.7 ± 2.2824.8 ± 2.390.162
Lobe width right18.0 ± 1.1925.7 ± 1.99<.001*
Lobe width left18.0 ± 1.5425.2 ± 2.14<.001*
Concha length right12.8 ± 1.1716.3 ± 1.77<.001*
Concha length left13.0 ± 1.1516.0 ± 1.79<.001*
Concha width right12.9 ± 0.93815.1 ± 1.75<.001*
Concha width left13.5 ± 1.4314.5 ± 2.040.071
Morphological ear length right30.0 ± 1.4934.8 ± 1.36<.001*
Morphological ear length left30.3 ± 1.7233.4 ± 1.35<.001*
Concha bowl depth right9.62 ± 1.1412.9 ± 1.06<.001*
Concha bowl depth left9.48 ± 1.0412.6 ± 1.05<.001*
Helical mastoid distal length right16.8 ± 0.87515.8 ± 1.720.028*
Helical mastoid distal length left16.3 ± 1.0115.2 ± 1.480.006*
Tragus length right14.8 ± 2.8316.0 ± 1.780.135
Tragus length left14.7 ± 2.9615.5 ± 1.570.316
Thickness of ear lobe right6.41 ± 0.6567.88 ± 0.878<.001*
Thickness of ear lobe left6.41 ± 0.5757.47 ± 0.898<.001*
Auricular index right51.1 ± 6.7744.8 ± 3.00<.001*
Auricular index left49.7 ± 6.8245.2 ± 3.100.010*
Lobular index right72.1 ± 8.17102 ± 11.1<.001*
Lobular index left76.6 ± 8.17103 ± 13.9<.001*
Concha index right102 ± 10.393.1 ± 6.250.003*
Concha index left104 ± 11.190.7 ± 7.00<.001*
Ear attachment length right53.4 ± 6.5350.1 ± 2.860.318
Ear attachment length left54.5 ± 6.8248.8 ± 2.480.335
Ear inclination angle right14.9 ± 0.57215.4 ± 0.8860.053
Ear inclination angle left14.3 ± 0.61514.8 ± 0.9270.059
Anti helical take of angle right23.9 ± 1.2525.8 ± 0.912<.001*
Anti helical take of angle left23.2 ± 1.0125.2 ± 0.834<.001*
Concha mastoid angle right88.6 ± 1.7388.8 ± 1.560.753
Concha mastoid angle left87.6 ± 1.8288.3 ± 1.450.218

* P value < 0.05-Significant.

Gender and ear dimension

Binomial logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the correlations between various ear measurements and sex.

Multiple ear measurements were significant predictors of sex, as shown in Table 5.

  • 1. Right ear length: (sex) = -59.889 + 0.916 × (right ear length)

  • 2. Left ear length: (sex) = -45.564 + 0.710 × (left ear length)

  • 3. Right lobe width: This predictor showed perfect separation, indicating extremely high predictive power

  • 4. Right concha bowl depth: (gender) = -40.82 + 3.67 * (right concha bowl depth)

  • 5. Left concha bowl depth: (gender) = -47.90 + 4.38 * (left concha bowl depth)

Table 5. Showing logistic regression analysis of ear morphometric predictors for gender.

Predictorp valueOdds Ratio (95% CI)Accuracy AUC
Right ear length<.0012.50 (1.12-5.57)0.9250.988
Left ear length<.0012.03 (1.28-3.22)0.9250.978
Right lobe width<.0017.11e+11 (0.00 – Inf )1.0001.000
Right concha bowl depth<.00139.1 (1.49-1023)0.9750.985
Left concha bowl depth<.00180.2 (1.86-3464)0.9500.990
9e59ebee-1b7c-4fea-9b50-1baca48abb0a_figure5.gif

Figure 5. ROC Curves. A. Right ear length. B. Left ear length. C. Right lobe width. D. Right concha bowl depth. E. Left concha bowl depth.

These results suggest that various ear measurements, particularly ear length, lobe width, and concha bowl depth, are strong predictors of sex. Right lobe width showed perfect separation, indicating its potential as an extremely reliable predictor.

Stature and gender specific ear dimension

Female

Looking through the correlation matrices, the strongest correlation with height is with the ear inclination angle of both sides, with

  • Right ear inclination angle: Pearson’s r = 0.489, (p-value-0.029)

  • Left ear inclination angle: Pearson’s r = 0.599 (p-value-0.005)

Linear regression analyses were conducted to examine the correlation between the height and ear inclination angle.

There was a substantial positive correlation between height and the right and left ear inclination angles. The regression equations were as follows:

RightEarInclination Angle(in degrees)=7.72+1.40×(Height in feet)
LeftEarInclination Angle(in degrees)=5.02+1.80×(Height in feet)

The consistent finding of a significant positive correlation between height and ear inclination angle provides strong evidence of a solid association between these variables. The findings indicate that for every one-foot increase in height, the ear inclination angle increases by approximately 1.40 to 1.80 °.

Male

In males, there was no statistically significant correlation between height and any of the ear measurements. This suggests that in males ear dimensions may not be reliable for predicting a person’s height.

Discussion

The pinna shape and dimensions are influenced by age, sex, and racial origin.2 Some of the features of the external ear are unique and peculiar in that they resemble the fingerprint of a person.20 Since the inclination, shape, and dimensions of the human external ear are very specific, they have been recognized as valuable anthropological variables for studying racial differences.21

Rai et al. found that approximately 38.8% of male and 36.9% of females had attached earlobes. The most common shape of the external ear was oval in both male and females. The ear index was higher in the male ears, whereas the lobule index was higher in the female ears. In their study, there were substantial differences between males and females in the following parameters: ear length right and left, ear width right and left, concha width, length of right ear lobule, and lobule index.22 In our study also most common ear shape was oval in both males and females. 15% of male and 30% of females had attached ear lobes. The ear index in our study was higher in females while the lobule index was higher in males. This difference might be due to ethnic origin, as they conducted the study in North India and we conducted the study in South India. In our study, there were substantial differences between males and females in the following parameters: ear length right and left, ear width right and left, concha width, and lobule index, except right lobule length.

Kumari et al. found that in males the ear length, width, and lobule width of both ears were higher as compared to females. They also found by linear regression coefficient analysis that there was a strong association between right and left ear length and stature in females.23 In our study, all these parameters were greater in females than in males. A strong association between the right and left ear inclination angles and stature was observed in females using linear regression coefficient analysis. These differences in findings could be ethnic, as they have conducted research in North India, and we have conducted research in South India.

Hiware et al. found that statistically significant differences were observed between males and females in right ear height, left ear width, and width of the right and left ear lobe.24 In our study, we also found statistically significant differences between these parameters in males and females.

Laxmi et al. found that the shape of the ear was oval in most specimens. The ear height and width were greater in males than females. The left auricular and lobular indices were higher in females than in males. Females had a longer right lobe than males. Tragus length was found to be greater in males than in females.25 In our study, ear height and width were greater in females than in males. The left auricular index was higher in females than in males, but the lobular index was higher in males than in females. Right lobe length was the same in both sexes. Tragus length was found to be greater in females than in males. These differences in findings might be ethnic, as they have conducted research in the northwestern region of India, and we have conducted the study in South India.

Verma et al. found that free and attached ear lobes were noted in 35% and 65% of the cases, respectively. The oval ear shape was the most common, followed by triangular, rectangular, and round shapes. No statistical differences were noted in the ear and lobular indices between males and females.26 In our study, 45% of free and 55% of attached ear lobes were observed. The oval ear shape was the most evident, followed by triangular, round, and rectangular. In our study, statistical differences were observed in the ear and lobular indices between males and females. These differences in findings can be ethnic, as they have conducted research in the northwestern and northeastern regions of India, and we have conducted the study in South India.

Farhan et al. found significant differences regarding gender in lobule height concerning sex. Free lobules were noted in 66% of males compared to 54% of females. The most common ear shape was triangular in males and rectangular in females.27 In our study, there was no significant difference noted regarding gender in lobule height between the sexes. In our study, 50% of male free lobules were noted compared to 40% of female free lobules. The most common shape was oval in both males and females. These differences in findings can be racial, as they have conducted research in Iraq, and we have conducted research in South India.

Bozkır et al. observed that all parameters measured were higher in males than in females. However, in our study, most parameters were found to be higher in females compared to males.28 These differences in findings may be attributed to racial variations, as their research was conducted in Turkey, while ours was conducted in South India.

Rani D et al. found that ear length, and ear breadth, exhibited significant sex differences on both sides (p<0.05). All ear measurements in males showed significant bilateral differences (p<0.05), except for lobule height. In females, significant side differences (p<0.05) were observed for lobule width.29 In our study also significant sex differences was noted on both sides in ear length (p<0.001 in each) and ear breadth (Right - p-0.005, left - p-.001). However there were no significant side differences noted in any of the parameters of the ear among males and females.

Khobkhun P et al. found no significant differences in auricular dimensions between the right and left sides. They also found that the auricular length, auricular width, and conchal length were larger in male than in female participants.30 While in our study we also found that that there was no significant difference in any of the auricular dimensions between the right and the left sides except lobe height (p-0.038). In our study, we found that all parameters related to the auricle were larger in females compared to males.

Boesoirie et al. reported that the auricle length, width, and concha length in men tended to be greater than those in women. However, the length of the lobule in women was found to be longer than in men, while the lobule and concha widths were similar in both sexes.31 Overall, our findings do not align with these observations, as all measured auricle parameters were larger in females compared to males. This might be due to racial differences as they have conducted the study in the Sudanese population and the present study was conducted in the Indian population.

Sowmya MV et al. found that oval shaped auricle, rolled helix, square earlobe and knob shaped tragus was seen in majority of the cases. The attached type of earlobe attachment was more in the right auricle (37%) and the partial attachment ear lobe was more in the left side auricle (35.5%). The mean length and width of the auricle & attachment length are higher in males compared to females. Ear Angulation is highest among females.32 In our study also most common shape was oval. But helix was most commonly concave marginal, ear lobe was arched, and tragus was round. Ear lobe attachment was free. In our study all parameters are higher in females compared to males. This might be due to ethnic differences as they have conducted the study in the Northern population and the present study was conducted in the Southern population.

Purohit K et al. found that males had significantly high ear parameters for both ears compared to females. There was a strong correlation of stature with the ear parameters.33 In our study all parameters are higher in females compared to males. In our study in females the strongest correlation with height is with the ear inclination angle of both sides. In males there was no statistically significant correlation between height and any of the ear measurements.

Jan SS and Mohd Saleem S found that males had significantly high ear parameters for both ears compared to females.34 In our study all parameters are higher in females compared to males. This might be due to ethnic differences as they have conducted the study in the Northern population and the present study was conducted in the Southern population.

Fakorede et al. found that oval ears were more common, followed by round ears. Arch-shaped lobules were the most frequently seen. Free earlobe attachment was the most common among the Nigerian populations, followed by partial attachment, while the attached earlobe was the least expressed. They also found that a knob-shaped tragus was the most prevalent. The wide form of the helix was the most evident. The nodosity-shaped Darwin tubercle appears to be the most prevalent. When comparing the right and left ear parameters, it was noted that all parameters were statistically significant, except for ear width. They also found that ear length, lobule height, lobule width, and concha length mainly contribute to sex classification.11 In our study, the most common ear shape was oval and arch-shaped. Even earlobe attachment was free in our study, followed by partial and full attachment. In our study, round-shaped tragus and concave marginal form of the helix were mostly observed. An enlarged Darwin’s tubercle was mostly observed. Comparing the parameters on the right and left sides, it was noticed that lobe height (p-value- 0.038), ear inclination angle (p-value- 0.002), antihelical takeoff angle (p-value- 0.045), and concha mastoid angle (p-value- 0.011) showed significant differences (p-value <0.05). The other parameters were not statistically significant. In our study, ear length, lobe width, and concha bowl depth were strong predictors of gender. Some differences in findings can be racial, as they have conducted research in Nigeria, and we have conducted research in South India.

Morphological changes and morphometric parameters of the human ear can be utilized jointly with forensic DNA evaluation to solve complicated incidents, principally where fingerprints or facial recognition tools are not accessible.11 The results of this study will help in identification of stature and sex from various ear parameters in young South Indian adults (18–25 years).

Limitations of the study

  • The results are preliminary and exploratory due to the small sample size, so, studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate these regression models and confirm predictors.

  • To predict male sex, no ear parameters were significant.

This study aimed to predict sex and stature based on ear dimensions in young South Indian adults (18–25 years). In both males and females, the common shape was oval, and the ear lobe was free. The most common shape of the ear lobe in males was arched, while in females, it was triangular. In males and females, the most common form of the helix was the concave marginal. In males, the most common shape of the tragus was round, whereas in females, it was long. In males and females, the most common shape of Darwin’s tubercle was enlarged.

Comparing the parameters on the right and left sides, it was noticed that lobe height, ear inclination angle, antihelical takeoff angle, and concha mastoid angle showed significant differences (p-value <0.05).

When comparing the parameters of females on the right and left sides, it was noticed that only the morphological ear length showed significant differences (p<0.05). When comparing the parameters of males on the right and left sides, it was noticed that only the ear inclination angle and concha mastoid angle showed significant differences (p<0.05).

When comparing parameters between males and females, it can be noticed that lobe height right and left, concha width left, tragus length right and left, ear attachment length right and left, ear inclination angle right and left, concha mastoid angle right, and left were not significantly different (p-value >0.05).

It was seen that the right lobe width showed perfect separation, indicating its potential as an extremely reliable predictor of sex. It was noted that in females, the strongest correlation with height was with the ear inclination angle on both sides.

Ethical considerations

Institutional ethical approval was obtained from the Kasturba Medical College and Kasturba Hospital Institutional Ethics Committee on 31st May 31, 2024, before starting the research on 5th June 2024 (IEC NO – IEC2 – 113/2024).

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 3
VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 22 Jan 2025
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Acharya S, Gupta C, Palimar V et al. Morphological And Morphometric analysis of Human External Ear with Its Implications in Sex and Stature Estimation -– A Preliminary Observational Study [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2025, 14:119 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.160629.3)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 3
VERSION 3
PUBLISHED 15 May 2025
Revised
Views
1
Cite
Reviewer Report 04 Jun 2025
Nurdan Sezgin, Kütahya Health Sciences University, Kütahya, Turkey 
Approved
VIEWS 1
The authors' revisions are deemed sufficient. ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Sezgin N. Reviewer Report For: Morphological And Morphometric analysis of Human External Ear with Its Implications in Sex and Stature Estimation -– A Preliminary Observational Study [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2025, 14:119 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.181180.r385019)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
3
Cite
Reviewer Report 29 May 2025
Jolly Agarwal, ANATOMY, Government doon medical college, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India 
Approved
VIEWS 3
No ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Agarwal J. Reviewer Report For: Morphological And Morphometric analysis of Human External Ear with Its Implications in Sex and Stature Estimation -– A Preliminary Observational Study [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2025, 14:119 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.181180.r385016)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Version 2
VERSION 2
PUBLISHED 17 Mar 2025
Revised
Views
4
Cite
Reviewer Report 29 Apr 2025
Nurdan Sezgin, Kütahya Health Sciences University, Kütahya, Turkey 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 4
There are some points that need attention in the study:

1. The number of current publications in the references can be increased. Ear morphology studies have attracted more attention in recent years. Therefore, the number of publications ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Sezgin N. Reviewer Report For: Morphological And Morphometric analysis of Human External Ear with Its Implications in Sex and Stature Estimation -– A Preliminary Observational Study [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2025, 14:119 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.179146.r371387)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 15 May 2025
    Chandni Gupta, Department of Anatomy, Katsurba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India
    15 May 2025
    Author Response
    1. The number of current publications in the references can be increased. Ear morphology studies have attracted more attention in recent years. Therefore, the number of publications after 2020 can ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 15 May 2025
    Chandni Gupta, Department of Anatomy, Katsurba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India
    15 May 2025
    Author Response
    1. The number of current publications in the references can be increased. Ear morphology studies have attracted more attention in recent years. Therefore, the number of publications after 2020 can ... Continue reading
Views
4
Cite
Reviewer Report 29 Apr 2025
Anyanwu Godson Emeka, Kampala International University, Ishaka, Uganda 
Not Approved
VIEWS 4
The focus of this observational study was the morphology and morphometry of the human external ear studied in 40 young adults (20 males, 20 females) aged 18–25. Also studied was the reliability of generated data for sex determination and stature ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Emeka AG. Reviewer Report For: Morphological And Morphometric analysis of Human External Ear with Its Implications in Sex and Stature Estimation -– A Preliminary Observational Study [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2025, 14:119 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.179146.r374367)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 28 May 2025
    Chandni Gupta, Department of Anatomy, Katsurba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India
    28 May 2025
    Author Response
    1. Title as it is looks a bit clumsy, I suggest: Morphological and Morphometric Analysis of the Human External Ear: Implications for Sex and Stature Estimation- Changed the title
    ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 28 May 2025
    Chandni Gupta, Department of Anatomy, Katsurba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India
    28 May 2025
    Author Response
    1. Title as it is looks a bit clumsy, I suggest: Morphological and Morphometric Analysis of the Human External Ear: Implications for Sex and Stature Estimation- Changed the title
    ... Continue reading
Views
9
Cite
Reviewer Report 25 Apr 2025
Adil Asghar, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 9
  1. Clarify Limitation Regarding Generalizability
    • Issue: Although “population” was removed from the title, the findings are still generalized in the text.
    • Required Action: Re-emphasize that results are applicable only
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Asghar A. Reviewer Report For: Morphological And Morphometric analysis of Human External Ear with Its Implications in Sex and Stature Estimation -– A Preliminary Observational Study [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2025, 14:119 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.179146.r374370)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 04 May 2025
    Chandni Gupta, Department of Anatomy, Katsurba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India
    04 May 2025
    Author Response
    1. Clarify Limitation Regarding Generalizability
      • Issue: Although “population” was removed from the title, the findings are still generalized in the text.
      • Required Action:
    ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 04 May 2025
    Chandni Gupta, Department of Anatomy, Katsurba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India
    04 May 2025
    Author Response
    1. Clarify Limitation Regarding Generalizability
      • Issue: Although “population” was removed from the title, the findings are still generalized in the text.
      • Required Action:
    ... Continue reading
Views
4
Cite
Reviewer Report 21 Mar 2025
Jolly Agarwal, ANATOMY, Government doon medical college, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India 
Approved
VIEWS 4
no ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Agarwal J. Reviewer Report For: Morphological And Morphometric analysis of Human External Ear with Its Implications in Sex and Stature Estimation -– A Preliminary Observational Study [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2025, 14:119 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.179146.r371386)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 22 Jan 2025
Views
11
Cite
Reviewer Report 04 Mar 2025
Nurdan Sezgin, Kütahya Health Sciences University, Kütahya, Turkey 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 11
A current issue has been addressed. I suggest updates on a few issues:
- Not enough current publications have been included
- Conclusion is not satisfactory enough. I attribute this to the small number of subjects.
- ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Sezgin N. Reviewer Report For: Morphological And Morphometric analysis of Human External Ear with Its Implications in Sex and Stature Estimation -– A Preliminary Observational Study [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2025, 14:119 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.176552.r363729)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 17 Mar 2025
    Chandni Gupta, Department of Anatomy, Katsurba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India
    17 Mar 2025
    Author Response
    A current issue has been addressed. I suggest updates on a few issues:

    - Not enough current publications have been included
    Response:- Added 3 more new references and compared with ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 17 Mar 2025
    Chandni Gupta, Department of Anatomy, Katsurba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India
    17 Mar 2025
    Author Response
    A current issue has been addressed. I suggest updates on a few issues:

    - Not enough current publications have been included
    Response:- Added 3 more new references and compared with ... Continue reading
Views
11
Cite
Reviewer Report 13 Feb 2025
Jolly Agarwal, ANATOMY, Government doon medical college, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India 
Anurag Agrawal, Pulmonary Medicine, Government Doon Medical College, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India 
Approved
VIEWS 11
Summary – The present observational study focuses on evolution of stature and sexual dimorphism of external ear using various morphometric parameters and morphological features for forensic identification. The external ear can be used to evaluate sex and stature of person from ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Agarwal J and Agrawal A. Reviewer Report For: Morphological And Morphometric analysis of Human External Ear with Its Implications in Sex and Stature Estimation -– A Preliminary Observational Study [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2025, 14:119 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.176552.r363735)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 3
VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 22 Jan 2025
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.