ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article

Evaluation of risk factors for ocular morbidities and its impact on the lives of medical students: An academic collateral.

[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
PUBLISHED 07 Nov 2025
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS AWAITING PEER REVIEW

This article is included in the Manipal Academy of Higher Education gateway.

This article is included in the Eye Health gateway.

Abstract

Background

One billion people worldwide have preventable vision impairment. Ocular morbidities are a significant problem in the public health sector, especially among medical students. The study objectives were to identify the prevailing ocular morbidities and evaluate the risk factors and their impact on students’ lifestyles and academics.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted among 312 undergraduate medical students over 6 months. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire and analysed to identify the prevalence, associated risk factors, and consequences of ocular morbidities.

Results

64.7% were suffering from ocular morbidities. Headache was a predominant symptom in students with (51.7%) and without (39.1%) ocular morbidities. The most common ocular morbidity was myopia (84.3%). 18.7% of students perceived that ocular morbidity had restricted them from participating in activities or applying for specific job posts. The evaluation of various risk factors inferred that ocular morbidity was associated with family history, early age onset of the condition, lighting, posture while reading, screen time, and a vitamin A-rich diet.

Conclusion

The study concluded that the most prevalent ocular morbidity was refractive error, with myopia being the highest among medical students, and it has adversely impacted the students’ lifestyle and academics, underscoring the need for early detection, preventive strategies, and health education interventions.

Keywords

Ocular morbidity, Medical Student, Academics, Lifestyle, Myopia

Introduction

At least 2.2 billion people have vision impairment worldwide, and among these, 1 billion vision impairments are preventable.1 Avoidable ocular morbidities are a significant public health problem in India.2 Vision is an important and special sense of living beings. These days, it is common to find an increasing number of younger people and even children complaining about several vision problems apart from the age-onset eye conditions. The prevalence of myopia was attributed to urban lifestyle, family history, longer time spent on near-work activities, and fewer outdoor activities. Few surveys have explored the role of high exposure in developing cell phone vision syndrome among college students.3 Environmental factors, such as dryness, potentially contribute to ocular discomfort and alteration of the tear film.4 Ocular morbidities are common among medical students, although many areas in this field require good near and far vision.5 Sleep disorders and underlying diseases are also major concerns pertaining to the onset of vision-related tiredness.6 There is a need for standard vision testing in the young population to diagnose such problems at the earliest.7 The current study aimed to identify the risk factors for various vision problems among medical students that affect their lifestyles.

Medical students are prone to excessive device usage due to recent shifts to online mode during the pandemic, followed by a hybrid mode of study as well as a heavy load of academic involvement. We intend to identify the risk factors for vision problems among such students and their effect on the lifestyle of the students so that the issue of increasing ocular morbidities can be addressed.

Objectives

  • 1. To identify the ocular morbidities prevailing in medical students.

  • 2. To evaluate the risk factors causing the ocular morbidities.

  • 3. To discuss its impact on the lifestyle & academics of medical students.

Methodology

Study design

A cross-sectional study was conducted among 312 undergraduate medical students over six months.

Sample size

312. The study sample was calculated by using a population proportion of ocular morbidity of 50%, confidence interval (CI) of 95%, population size around 800, and an error of 5%, which is estimated as 260. Assuming a non-response rate of 20%, the sample size was calculated as 312. A sampling method of complete enumeration was used with the inclusion of medical students with ocular morbidities (vision problems) in the age group 18-26 years, currently pursuing their professional course, and who consented to participate in the study. Those lacking any prescription or knowledge of ocular morbidity or those submitting incomplete forms were excluded from the study.

Study tools

A semi-structured questionnaire was circulated through an online Google survey form, which was developed and validated by a panel of public health experts. The questionnaire comprised five sections of socio-demographic profile, status of ocular morbidity, impact on lifestyle, impact on academics, and open-ended questions discussing the difficulties faced due to ocular morbidity and suggestions to overcome them.

Ethical approval statement

The study was reviewed and approved by the Manipal Tata Medical College Institutional Ethics Committee (DHR Registration: EC/NEW/INST/2022/2810) with approval number MTMC/IEC/2023/31. All procedures performed involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Data collection

Data were collected using an online Google survey form administered to MBBS students across all phases of study in two medical colleges within the region. Written informed consent was obtained electronically through the survey platform, and only participants who provided consent were permitted to complete the questionnaire. No minors were enrolled in the study. In accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, morbidity details were further gathered through structured telephonic interviews and subsequently verified by subject experts prior to inclusion in the analysis.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics for quantitative data in the form of percentages and proportions, along with the chi-square test for categorical data, were used. Thematic analysis was performed on qualitative data obtained through open-ended questions.

Results

Out of 312 majority were females (72.4%) and currently living in hostels (84.4%). Around 83.4% belonged to general caste and high socioeconomic status (86.5%).

202 students (64.7%) were suffering from ocular morbidities currently. Rest of the 110 students (35.3%) had ocular morbidities in the past. However, the students were having ocular symptoms (headache, strain in the eyes, itchiness, watery eyes, eye fatigue, dark circles, dry eye, etc.), among which headaches were the predominant symptom (39.1%). The majority revealed that there were no interventional procedures performed for their past ocular morbidities, except a few (4.3%), which were minor interventions such as chalazion cyst removal, Lasik, trauma, and foreign body in the eye, etc.

Out of 202 students who were suffering from one or other forms of ocular morbidity, the majority had myopia (84.3%), followed by astigmatism (6.4%), hypermetropia (3.3%), strabismus (1.9%), and others (4.1%), including glaucoma, color blindness, retinal thinning, granular corneal dystrophy, and the predominant symptom was headache (51.7%).

The age of onset of the ocular morbidity was ≤15 years in 62.8% of students. The most common presentation was headache (56%), followed by blurred vision (32%) where they were not inability to see the blackboard, red, dry, and watery eyes (8.2%), and regular checkup (3.8%). As perceived by the students, ocular morbidities have been managed; however, the conditions had variable outcomes in terms of 38.9% improvement, 37% not change, 22.7% worsened, and 1.4% were unsure of their conditions.

Likewise, (12.8%) few students had claimed the reason for their development of ocular morbidity after joining medical colleges.

Currently, 89.1% students were using spectacles and rest of them were either contact lenses or both. Amongst them, 88.2% were using it regularly and rest who were not using it regularly. The reasons stated were ignorance, not fashionable, not required for other than academics, non compliance due to unawareness, uncomfortable.

The mean power of right eye and left eye were -1.24 with a lowest of -0.5 to highest of – 8.5 & -1.21 with a lowest of -0.5 to the highest of -6.25 respectively. The majority had the last eye check-up for an average 6.8 months back.

Very few had any interventional procedures (3.8%) or had history (2.9%) majority (91.6%) had a family history of ocular morbidities in their family members. There were no associated co morbidities, except for few (8.6%) such as diabetes, hypertension, thyroid disorder, asthma, migraine, PCOS, epilepsy, bronchitis, and tuberculosis. Only 6% students had mentioned the presence of addiction in their families.

94 students were taking vitamin and mineral supplements attributed to doctors (62.4%) or parent’s (37.6%), including various forms such as Multivitamin, Vitamin B complex, Vitamin D, Iron or IFA, Calcium, Biotin, Omega 3, Vitamin B12, Zinc etc. When asked about the intake of vitamin A-rich food, almost all were eating it consciously or unconsciously in various forms; however, the frequency varied, as shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Frequency of vitamin A-rich food intake (N = 312).

SL. NoFrequency of vitamin A rich food intake Percentage
1Once a week43.30%
22 or more times a week30.60%
3Rarely13.50%
4Never12.60%

Out of the 312, the majority, 84.4% preferred physical books to read, although virtual PDF books were available. Likewise, the majority (67.2%) used tables and chairs while reading, followed by other means, such as bed, couch, floor, and others [ Table 2].

Table 2. Posture while reading (N = 312).

Sl. NoPosture while reading Percentage
1Sitting on a Chair and table61.20%
2Sitting/lying on a couch22.80%
3Lying down9.40%
4Sitting on floor4.60%
5Others2%

Students had various forms of entertainment, either virtually via electronic devices (59.8%) or physically by interacting with friends and family (58%), followed by outdoor/indoor games (38%), video games, and various other social media interactions. The students were using devices for multiple purposes, but for varied periods of time, as per their needs [ Figure 1].

02dc24e6-f86a-4778-8c51-7f236de6b5fb_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Average screen time of participants (N = 312 Medical Students).

When asked about adequate lighting, the majority (77.3%) said yes. However, the average number of windows and doors in the reading room was 1.5 and one, respectively, indicating that there was a lack of natural light in the room. Similarly, the average study hours during daylight were less than 3 h compared to study hours without daylight (i.e., 5 h). The majority had a mean sleep hour of 7.3 in the night and a total of 8.6 hours during the 24hours of the day and night. The sources of artificial lights were either light bulbs, tube lights, study lamps, or a combination of them [ Figure 2].

02dc24e6-f86a-4778-8c51-7f236de6b5fb_figure2.gif

Figure 2. Sources of Artificial Light used by Participants (N = 312 Medical Students).

Early age of onset (<15 years of age) and regular eye check-ups (at least once in 6 months) were associated with improved outcomes (P < 0.0001) with respect to ocular morbid conditions. Inappropriate posture, more than five hours of screen time, and device intimacy were significantly associated (P < 0.0001) with ocular morbidities. The association between perceived adequacy of lighting and the occurrence of morbid ocular conditions was found to be insignificant. (P = 0.7705). Female sex and family history were also associated with ocular morbidities (P < 0.0001). Multivitamin supplementation was associated with a lower incidence of any form of ocular morbidity (P < 0.0001) [ Table 3].

Table 3. Association of various risk factors with ocular morbidity (N = 312).

Risk factors YesNo P value
1. Family History Present 19293p < 0.0001
Absent 1017
2. Screen Time >5 hr14433p < 0.0001
<5-hr5877
3. Device intimacy Present14244p < 0.0001
Absent6066
4.Gender Female16263p < 0.0001
Male4047
5. Light Adequate15586P = 0.7705
Inadequate4724
6. Posture Right10486p < 0.0001
Wrong9824
7. Vitamin Supplementation Present2470p < 0.0001
Absent17840
Improved or No change Worsened
8. Age of onset During school (<_15 yr)6166p < 0.0001
After school (>15 Years)5916
9. Routine check-ups <6 months10247p < 0.0001
>6 months1835

18.7% of students confessed that ocular morbidity had restricted them from participating in activities or applying for a post, such as swimming, military/army/air force post, dance, a few sports, basketball, badminton, cricket, driving at night, watching 3D movies, continuous screen use, and seeing through microscopes, etc.

The students mentioned various challenges encountered with ocular morbidity and suggested solutions to overcome them through open-ended questions, which were presented as themes [ Figure 3].

02dc24e6-f86a-4778-8c51-7f236de6b5fb_figure3.gif

Figure 3. Challenges and suggested solutions for ocular morbidities.

Discussion

The majority (57.4%) had myopia in the current study followed by other conditions. Studies has stated Refractive error is the most common ocular morbid condition among children.8 Likewise the most common presentation of ocular symptoms at onset was blurred vision, followed by headache. However, another study found that headache (50%) and dry eyes (45%) were the common ocular complaints, and myopia was common as well among the students.9

The students were concerned about the challenges encountered when dealing with ocular morbidities, such as the inability to study long hours and engaging with devices. Likewise, an observational study was conducted among 200 medical students who are using smart phone, laptops, and computers to determine the relationship between eye strain and related risk factors, which showed that most of the students had more than one symptom, such as headache (56.77%), eye strain (50.52%), blurring of vision (40.62%), and redness (23.95%). 85% of patients used electronic devices for longer duration of 4-10 hours, had more asthenopia or eye strain.10

Although inappropriate posture, more than five hours of screen time, and device intimacy had a significant association, the perceived adequacy of lighting had no statistically significant association with the occurrence of ocular morbid conditions. Another study on the prevalence of eye strain and other ocular morbidities among students inferred that low levels of lighting in the classroom may be an contributing factor for ocular morbidity.11

The current study observed that female students and those with a family history of ocular morbidity were more vulnerable to ocular morbidity. Another study showed similar results, with a higher prevalence of ocular morbidity among females.8

The students suggested solutions to the perceived challenges pertaining to ocular morbidities, such as a vitamin A-rich diet, reduced screen time, yoga, hydration, and regular eye check-ups. Similarly, age <17years was found to be another factor responsible for the high prevalence of ocular morbidities, to which the suggested reasonable services were early screening and health education. Another study among medical students observed common ocular morbidities, such as refractive errors, dry eyes, and color blindness, directing frequent eye checkups.12,13

As discussed in the study, students were predominantly myopic and using spectacles; they also perceived limitations in playing outdoor games and sports due to their ocular morbidity. Studies have found similar findings where myopia was the common ocular morbidity among medical students as a huge portion of their time was spent on near –work and doing indoor activities while very less in doing outdoor activities, which was indicated as a risk factor for myopia.14,15

Conclusion

The study concluded that the most prevalent ocular morbidity among medical students was refractive error, with myopia being the most prevalent. Evaluation of various risk factors inferred that ocular morbidity in students was associated with familial history, female sex, appropriate posture while reading, screen time, device intimacy, and multivitamin supplementation. Ocular morbid conditions have adversely affected the students’ lifestyles and academics in terms of their inability to participate in sports and games, career aspirations, such as in the Army or Air Force, Navy, etc. Likewise, the inability to study long hours is another negative effect of ocular morbidity as perceived by the students, underscoring the need for early detection, preventive strategies, and health education interventions.

Limitations

A small sample size and an online questionnaire were used for data collection. There is scope for a larger study in the future to explore ocular morbidity among healthcare professionals.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 07 Nov 2025
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Haneen H, Begum J, Ali SI et al. Evaluation of risk factors for ocular morbidities and its impact on the lives of medical students: An academic collateral. [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]. F1000Research 2025, 14:1230 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.167220.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status:
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 07 Nov 2025
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.