ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article
Revised

Accuracy of Systemic Inflammatory Indices in identifying Neonatal Sepsis in preterms in a tertiary care hospital in Mangalore

[version 3; peer review: 4 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
PUBLISHED 10 Jun 2026
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Manipal Academy of Higher Education gateway.

Abstract

Background

The utility of Systemic Inflammatory Indices as accurate indicators of neonatal sepsis remains underexplored in the Indian population. This study will assist in determining whether these indices can be used to predict neonatal sepsis at the bedside and as an early sensitive predictor of sepsis in preterms.

Methods

A prospective case-control study was done, where the Systemic Inflammatory Indices of the two groups of preterms – one control group without sepsis and one case group with culture proven sepsis–were compared to assess their value in predicting Neonatal Sepsis. Data from 138 preterm neonates were used in the present study. Six Systemic Inflammatory Indices were calculated - Systemic Immune Inflammatory Index (SII), Systemic Inflammation Response Index (SIRI), PanImmune Inflammation Value (PIV), Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) and Monocyte to Lymphocyte Ratio (MLR). These values from both the case and control groups were compared.

Results

Platelet count had the highest predictive value, with an AUC value of 0.715(95% CI 0.628-0.802, p<0.001) and optimal cut-off value of 219500 cells/cu mm. It had a sensitivity of 75.4 and specificity of 65.2. PIV had an AUC of 0.665(95% CI 0.574-0.755, p=0.001), a sensitivity of 60.9, and a specificity of 68.1. For PLR, Sensitivity and specificity were 72.5 and 58, respectively, with an AUC of 0.668(95% CI 0.577-0.758, p=0.001). With sensitivity and specificity of 66.7 and 62.3 respectively, SII had an AUC of 0.65(95% CI 0.558-0.743, p=0.002). SIRI, NLR and MLR did not demonstrate statistically significant differences between the groups(p>0.05).

Conclusion

There was moderate correlation between the studied hematological indices and positive cultures, suggesting their potential role as inflammatory markers. Larger prospective trials should be conducted to further validate their potential clinical value.

Keywords

Neonatal Sepsis, Prevention, Preterm, Inflammatory markers, Early diagnosis

Revised Amendments from Version 2

We have revised the manuscript in accordance with the reviewer’s comments. The abstract has been corrected, and the term “markers” has been replaced with “indices” throughout the manuscript where appropriate. The Introduction and Summary of Evidence sections have been made more concise and focused. Additional clarifications have been incorporated into the Methods section to improve readability and transparency. Table 2 has been thoroughly rechecked and corrected for accuracy. Furthermore, the Limitations section has been expanded with additional relevant limitations, and the Conclusion has been refined to specifically reflect the findings of the present study rather than providing generalized statements.

See the authors' detailed response to the review by Dr Shashidhar A
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Sanjoy Kumer Dey
See the authors' detailed response to the review by I Ketut Alit Utamayasa and Prima Nastiti
See the authors' detailed response to the review by K. Shreedhara Avabratha
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Dr. Sweta Shanbhag

Introduction

Dysregulation of the host response to any systemic bacterial, viral, or fungal infection within day 28 of the life of both term and preterm newborns can result in neonatal sepsis, a potentially fatal and life-threatening illness.1 It is categorized based on onset - early-onset sepsis (EOS), diagnosed at or before 72 hours of life (some define as 7 days), and late-onset sepsis (LOS), diagnosed after 72 hours.2

Neonatal sepsis accounts for approximately 8% of neonatal deaths and remains a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality, especially in low- and middle-income countries, with early-onset sepsis occurring more frequently than late-onset sepsis.3,4

The highest rate of clinical sepsis (17,000per 1,000,000 live births) has been reported in India.5 The fatality rate due to sepsis in Indian newborns ranges from 25% to 65%.6

Blood culture remains the gold standard for diagnosis,7 but results take 48–72 hours, and lack of distinct early clinical signs make timely diagnosis difficult.8,9 Therefore, a sensitive and simple bedside diagnostic tool is required for early detection of newborn sepsis.

Studies show that neonatal sepsis, especially early-onset sepsis (EOS), can be predicted using inflammatory markers such as NLR, PLR, SII, MLR, SIRI, and PIV, which are typically elevated.10,11 We aimed to determine whether the SII, SIRI, MLR, NLR, PIV, and PLR can be used as valuable markers for the early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis in preterms in the Indian population.

Summary of evidence

The prognostic significance of NLR and SII for newborn sepsis in babies with congenital heart disease was shown by Aydogan et al.12 Güngör et al. found SII to be a predictor of urinary tract infections in neonates,13 while Runqiang Liang et al. highlighted its role in diagnosing serious bacterial infections.14 In premature infants, elevated SII levels were also linked to respiratory distress syndrome.15 Increased SII, SIRI, PIV, and NLR values were observed in infants with hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy.16 Higher SIRI and SII levels were linked to a higher risk of secondary infections in preterm newborns, according to Chen et al.17

SII, NLR, SIRI, and PLR were validated by Muzaffer Islam et al., and SII was linked to adverse neonatal outcomes in PPROM by Tanacan et al.18,19 Mangalesh et al. identified NLR, SII, and PLR as mortality predictors, while Xianghui Liang et al. noted day-1 WBC and platelets as neonatal sepsis mortality markers.20,21 Cruz et al. found leukocyte counts alone were not reliable for infection, while Minichil Worku et al. found TLC, ANC, and platelets useful for neonatal sepsis diagnosis.22,23 Thrombocytopenia was consistently associated with increased mortality in neonatal sepsis, particularly in gram-negative infections, as reported by Isabelle M C Ree et al and Vizcarra-Jimenez et al.24,25 Ashour et al and Can et al found that NLR and PLR showed significant diagnostic utility and were positively associated with early-onset sepsis.26,27 Vardar et al revealed that preterm neonates with late-onset sepsis were shown to have higher SII levels.28 Mubaraki et al. reported strong associations between neonatal sepsis and leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia, while Li et al. found a significant association with increased NLR.29,30

Need for study

Due to paucity of data in the Indian context, the utility of Systemic Inflammatory Indices as reliable predictors of Neonatal Sepsis in preterm infants has not been adequately evaluated this study will help determine whether these indices can be used as an early sensitive predictor of sepsis in preterms and will be useful in predicting neonatal sepsis at the bedside. This will also help reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality.

Methods

The Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), Government Lady Goschen Hospital, Mangalore, was the site of this prospective case–control study. The case group consisted of neonatal sepsis preterm infants, and the control group consisted of preterm infants without sepsis. The study duration was six months. The sample size was calculated using OpenEpi version 3.01. Effect estimates for inflammatory indices were derived from a previously published study by Zhu et al.,10 which evaluated NLR, PLR, and SII as diagnostic markers of neonatal sepsis. Sample size calculations were performed separately for three inflammatory indices, and the largest calculated sample size was selected to ensure adequate statistical power. Based on this approach, a total of 138 preterm neonates (69 cases and 69 controls) were included in the study.

The inclusion criteria for selection were preterm neonates admitted to NICU. Term neonates admitted to the NICU, preterm neonates with incomplete laboratory records and those in whom blood culture was not performed, neonates with major congenital anomalies, healthy newborns in postnatal wards, and those unwilling to participate in the study were excluded from the study.

Infants born preterm are born before 37 weeks of gestation. They were further categorized as extremely preterm (<28 weeks), very preterm (28-31 weeks), late (34-36 weeks), and moderately preterm (32-33 weeks).31 The “gold standard” to confirm neonatal sepsis is still the conventional culture methods. If microbial growth is observed in blood cultures or other sterile body fluids, sepsis is considered culture-proven.32

Preterms were divided into a case group consisting of 69 preterms with sepsis and a control group consisting of 69 preterms without sepsis based on their blood culture reports sent according to the NICU protocol. Preterms with positive blood cultures were in the case group, and preterms with negative blood culture reports and no other clinical signs of sepsis were selected for the control group (Figure 1).33 Formal matching was not performed; however, both cases and controls were drawn from the same source population of preterm neonates admitted to the NICU during the same study period.

ee85e39f-2fe4-4b5a-a313-3e47e2508285_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Flow diagram showing selection of cases and controls among preterm neonates admitted to the NICU.

Samples were collected from the neonate after 24 h of life as per the routine newborn screening protocol, prior to confirmation of sepsis by blood culture at the Government Lady Goschen Hospital NICU, blood culture is performed as part of routine neonate screening protocol, consistent with recommendations for high risk preterm monitoring in resource constrained settings. Data were obtained from neonatal health records. These values reflect the inflammatory milieu at the time of clinical suspicion and blood culture collection, rather than post confirmation. Blood cultures were performed using the BACTEC system following NICU protocol. From the collected data, the SII, SIRI, PIV, NLR, MLR, and PLR were calculated using the following formulae:

  • 1) Systemic Immune Inflammatory Index(SII)=[platelet/lymphocyte]Neutrophil 34

  • 2) Systemic Inflammation Response Index(SIRI)=[monocyte/lymphocyte]Neutrophil 35

  • 3) PanImmune Inflammation Value(PIV)=Platelet[monocyte/lymphocyte]Neutrophil 36

  • 4) Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio(NLR) 10

  • 5) Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio(PLR) 10

  • 6) Monocyte to Lymphocyte Ratio(MLR) 11

The selected indices (SII, SIRI, PIV, NLR, MLR, PLR) are well-established markers of systemic inflammation and immune status. For instance, SII integrates platelet, neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts, reflecting the balance between inflammation and immune response.10,11,18 These indices have been previously validated as prognostic or diagnostic markers in sepsis and neonatal inflammatory conditions.32,34 Therefore, they were chosen to comprehensively evaluate the inflammatory status in preterm neonates with sepsis.

IBM SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) Statistics for Windows Version 29.0. Armonk, NY:IBM Corp. used to analyse the data. Descriptive statistics were presented as standard deviations and means. An independent sample t-test was used to compare the scores of the case and control arms. Statistical significance was defined as a p-value of less than 0.05. To assess the predictive ability of the diagnostic markers, ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis was performed. Additionally, the optimum cut-off value was determined using the Youden Index.

Results

A total of 138 preterm neonates were included in this study, out of which, 50% of patients belonged to the sepsis group.

Table 1 shows the clinical characteristics of the neonates. Of the 69 infants in the control group, 49.3% were male. The babies were categorized as late preterm (52.2%), moderate preterm (18.8%), very preterm (27.5%), and extremely preterm (1.4%). The majority of babies were delivered via normal vaginal delivery (60.9%). There were 38 babies with low birth weight (LBW), 29 with very low birth weight (VLBW), one with extremely low birth weight (ELBW) baby and 1 baby of normal birth weight. 31.9 Of the babies, 31.9% were found to be small for gestational age (SGA) and 68.1% were found to be appropriate for gestational age (AGA).

Table 1.

Maternal and neonatal characteristics of the study population.37

CharacteristicSepsis group (n = 69) n (%) Control group (n = 69) n (%)
Maternal age (years) 26.46 ± 5.4128.06 ± 4.86
Sex of neonate
Male35 (50.7)34 (49.3)
Female34 (49.3)35 (50.7)
Gestational age category
Late preterm (34–36 weeks)23 (33.3)36 (52.2)
Moderate preterm (32–33 weeks)16 (23.2)13 (18.8)
Very preterm (28–31 weeks)29 (42.0)19 (27.5)
Extremely preterm (<28 weeks)1 (1.4)1 (1.4)
Mode of delivery
Vaginal delivery39 (56.5)42 (60.9)
Lower segment cesarean section (LSCS)30 (43.5)27 (39.1)
Birth weight category
Low birth weight (LBW)14 (20.3)38 (55.1)
Very low birth weight (VLBW)54 (78.3)29 (42.0)
Extremely low birth weight (ELBW)1 (1.4)1 (1.4)
Normal birth weight (NBW)0 (0.0)1 (1.4)
Growth status
Small for gestational age (SGA)14 (20.3)22 (31.9)
Appropriate for gestational age (AGA)55 (79.7)47 (68.1)

50.7 Of the patients in the sepsis group, 50.7% were male. Preterm sepsis was categorized as late preterm (33.3%), moderate preterm (23.3%), very preterm (42%), and extremely preterm (1.4%). None of the infants with sepsis had a normal birth weight. The majority of babies were delivered via normal vaginal delivery (56.5%). There were 14 LBW infants, 54 VLBW infants, and 1 ELBW infant. 20.3 Of the infants, 20.3% were small for gestational age (SGA) and 79.7% were appropriate for gestational age (AGA).

Table 2 shows laboratory parameters of the neonates. Compared to the control group, preterm babies of sepsis group had lower WBC, lower monocyte, lower neutrophil, lower platelet and lymphocyte counts. Values of platelet counts (P < 0.001), SII (P = 0.002), PIV (P < 0.001) and PLR (P < 0.001) were found to be statistically significant. Values of total count (P = 0.117), monocyte (P = 0.197), neutrophil (P = 0.694), lymphocyte (P = 0.436), SIRI (P = 0.944), NLR (P = 0.581) and MLR (P = 0.873) were not statistically significant.

Table 2. Laboratory parameters and inflammatory indices in preterm neonates with and without sepsis.37

ParameterControl (n = 69) Median (IQR)Case (n = 69) Median (IQR)P value
Total leukocyte count (cells/μL)11,500 (8,650–16,300)9,650 (6,610–16,380)0.117
Monocytes (%)8.0 (6.0–10.0)6.0 (5.0–10.0)0.197
Neutrophil (%)59.0 (50.0–66.0)56.0 (45.0–70.0)0.694
Platelet count (cells/μl)248,00 (202,000–299,000)164,000 (70,000–218,000)<0.001
Lymphocytes (%)28.0 (21.0–36.0)25.0 (17.0–36.0)0.436
SII (Systemic Immune-Inflammatory Index)496,909.9
(224,000.0–851,857.1)
232,400.0
(106,250.0–621,473.7)
0.002
SIRI (Systemic Inflammation Response Index)16.0 (9.0–25.5)14.9 (4.9–31.2)0.944
PIV (Pan Immune Inflammation Value)3,349,600.0
(1,503,673.5–6,404,363.6)
1,747,200.0
621,473.7–3,814,285.7)
<0.001
NLR (Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio)2.1 (1.5–3.2)2.2 (1.3–3.8)0.581
PLR (Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio)8,833.3 (4,939.4–12,866.7)4,934.4 (2,588.2–9,803.3)<0.001
MLR (Monocyte-to-Lymphocyte Ratio)0.28 (0.17–0.40)0.27 (0.14–0.48)0.873

To evaluate the predictive power of SII, platelet count, PIV, and PLR for neonatal sepsis, the area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated from the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The cutoff points were determined using the Youden Index.

The ROC curves for the predictive ability of SII, platelet count, PIV, and PLR are shown in Figure 2. Tables 3 and 4 show the ROC analysis and optimal cutoff values. Of the four variables, platelet count had the highest AUC value (0.715), with an ideal cut-off concentrations of 219500 cells/cu mm and sensitivity and specificity of 75.4 and 65.2 respectively. The AUC value for PLR was 0.668, the sensitivity and specificity were 72.5 and 58%, respectively, and the ideal cut-off value was 7923.19. The AUC value and cut-off value for PIV were 0.665 and 2187333.33, respectively, with a sensitivity of 60.9 and specificity of 68.1. The AUC value was lowest for SII (0.65), with an ideal cut-off values of 37656.79, and sensitivity and specificity of 66.7 and 62.3%, respectively.

ee85e39f-2fe4-4b5a-a313-3e47e2508285_figure2.gif

Figure 2. ROC curve analysis.37

Table 3.

ROC analysis to assess predictive ability of diagnostic markers to predict neonatal sepsis.37

ParameterAUC p value 95% CI Lower Bound 95% CI Upper Bound
SII (Systemic Immune-Inflammatory Index)0.650.0020.5580.743
Platelet count (cells/μL)0.715<0.0010.6280.802
PIV (Pan-Immune Inflammation Value)0.6650.0010.5740.755
PLR (Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio)0.6680.0010.5770.758

Table 4.

Optimal cutoff determined using ROC analysis.37

ParameterCut-offSensitivity (%) Specificity (%)
SII (Systemic Immune-Inflammatory Index)37,656.7966.762.3
Platelet count (cells/μL)219,50075.465.2
PIV (Pan-Immune Inflammation Value)2,187,333.3360.968.1
PLR (Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio)7,923.1972.558.0

Critical reflection

Of the 138 preterm babies included in the study, the majority were late preterm, 23 belonged to the sepsis group, and 36 belonged to the control group. Most of the babies in both the sepsis (56.5%) and control (60.9%) groups were delivered by normal vaginal delivery. The majority of babies in the sepsis group had very low birth weight (78.3%) and the majority in the control group had low birth weight (55.1%).

Platelet count, SII, PIV, and PLR were found to be significant predictors of neonatal sepsis. Platelet count had the highest predictive value, with an AUC value of 0.715 and optimal cut-off value of 219500 cells/cu mm. It had a sensitivity of 75.4 and specificity of 65.2.

Discussion

Early detection of neonatal sepsis remains challenging due to nonspecific clinical signs and the time required for blood culture results. PLR, SII, and platelet count all showed differences between neonates with and without sepsis in our study, with platelet count exhibiting the strongest correlation. These findings are consistent with other research indicating that platelet-related indices may be useful in evaluating newborn sepsis. Day-one WBC and platelet counts could serve as early markers of sepsis, according to Xianghui Liang et al. and Minichil Worku et al.21,23 According to Isabelle M. C. Ree et al. and Vizcarra-Jimenez et al.,24,25 thrombocytopenia has also been linked to higher mortality in neonatal sepsis, especially in gram-negative infections.

Previous research has also assessed inflammatory indices such SII, NLR, PLR, and SIRI. According to Zhu et al., newborn sepsis may be reflected by PLR, SII, and NLR, with SII exhibiting a comparatively larger predictive value.10 Similarly SII, PLR, and NLR may also be useful in diagnosing sepsis-related outcomes, according to Mangalesh et al. and Islam et al.18,20 Higher SIRI and SII levels were linked to a higher risk of secondary infections in preterm newborns, according to Chen et al.17 However, SIRI did not significantly differ in our study, suggesting that its effectiveness may differ depending on the population.

The potential application of SII in particular newborn diseases is supported by additional research. While Güngör et al and Runqiang Liang et al13,14 emphasized SII in urinary tract infections and serious bacterial infections respectively, Aydogan et al. reported that NLR and SII may be linked to outcomes in infants with congenital heart disease.12 Preterm newborns with late-onset sepsis have increased SII levels, according to Vardar et al.28 Furthermore, links between neonatal sepsis and hematologic abnormalities such as leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and increased NLR were found by Mubaraki et al. and Li et al.29,30 These results imply that a variety of hematologic and inflammatory indices may be useful in predicting newborn sepsis, although the relative effectiveness of these indices may differ depending on the situation.

The absence of statistically significant difference in NLR unlike in most adult studies may reflect the unique hematological physiology of preterm neonates. Unlike adults, preterm infants have an immature neutrophil storage pool, resulting in attenuated neutrophilia. This blunted neutrophil response may reduce discriminatory capacity of NLR in this population. The AUC values reported in our study - ranging from 0.65 (SII) to 0.715(platelet count) represent moderate diagnostic performance. Hence these markers can have a role as supplementary indicators intended to complement early diagnosis, rather than used as standalone diagnostic tools.

It is important to note several limitations. The results of our study may not be generalizable to other groups because it was limited to a single tertiary care facility. The found associations may be influenced by variables like gestational age, birth weight, comorbidities, and laboratory techniques. Multivariate analysis and larger sample size will be required to establish independent predictive efficacy. To define uniform thresholds for clinical use and to further investigate the potential utility of these markers, larger multicenter trials are required.

Overall, our findings suggest that SII and PLR, as well as platelet count and thrombocyte-related indices, have substantial correlation with newborn sepsis. These findings support earlier research while emphasizing the need for careful interpretation and additional validation in larger groups.

Limitations

This study was performed only among preterm infants in the NICU, and studies involving term infants admitted to the NICU may be required. Restricting cases and controls by culture results may have excluded subclinical or early infections, true infections and introduced misclassification. Studies involving culture negative sepsis will be required. Another major limitation of our study is that maternal factors such as chorioamnionitis, prolonged rupture of membranes, intrapartum antibiotic exposure, pre eclampsia and neonatal factors such as congenital anomalies, respiratory distress syndrome, postnatal corticosteroid or inotrope use, which may influence these indices were not controlled for. Multivariate analysis was not performed due to the limited sample size and absence of comprehensive covariate data at the time of analysis. Potential confounders such as gestational age and birth weight may have influenced the results. Further multicenter studies with larger patient populations and multivariate analysis will be required to determine the independent diagnostic utility of these markers.

Conclusion

There was highest significant correlation between platelet count and positive cultures followed by PLR, PIV and SII, all with moderate statistical performance. Larger prospective trials should be conducted to further validate their potential clinical value. This will aid in early sepsis diagnosis and management and, in turn, reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality associated with sepsis.

Ethical approval statement

On 17/10/24, ethical clearance was granted by The Institutional Ethics Committee at Kasturba Medical College in Mangalore (Protocol No: IECKMCMLR10/2024/606). The MS of the Government Lady Goschen Hospital has given us permission to conduct this study.

Consent statement

As this was a laboratory record–based observational study utilizing routinely collected clinical and laboratory data without any additional sampling or intervention, individual informed consent was waived by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 3
VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 03 Apr 2025
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
GM S, Renganathan G and D'sa S. Accuracy of Systemic Inflammatory Indices in identifying Neonatal Sepsis in preterms in a tertiary care hospital in Mangalore [version 3; peer review: 4 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2026, 14:390 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.162331.3)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 3
VERSION 3
PUBLISHED 10 Jun 2026
Revised
Views
10
Cite
Reviewer Report 16 Jun 2026
Dr. Sweta Shanbhag, Father Muller Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 10
I would like to compliment the authors for the efforts taken to modify the manuscript as per the suggestions provided. However, I still have a few more minor suggestions/ corrections in order to make the study scientifically and grammatically sound.
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Shanbhag DS. Reviewer Report For: Accuracy of Systemic Inflammatory Indices in identifying Neonatal Sepsis in preterms in a tertiary care hospital in Mangalore [version 3; peer review: 4 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2026, 14:390 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.202236.r492517)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Version 2
VERSION 2
PUBLISHED 23 Feb 2026
Revised
Views
9
Cite
Reviewer Report 03 Apr 2026
Dr. Sweta Shanbhag, Father Muller Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 9
This is a clinically relevant and a well-structured study. I appreciate the authors for incorporating most of the changes and suggestions by previous reviewers. However there are a few more areas where you can improve the precision, tone and statistical ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Shanbhag DS. Reviewer Report For: Accuracy of Systemic Inflammatory Indices in identifying Neonatal Sepsis in preterms in a tertiary care hospital in Mangalore [version 3; peer review: 4 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2026, 14:390 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.196572.r468909)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 10 Jun 2026
    Smrithi null, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
    10 Jun 2026
    Author Response
    We sincerely thank Dr. Shanbhag for her constructive and expert review of our manuscript. We greatly appreciate her detailed and positive assessment of the study’s clinical relevance and structure, and ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 10 Jun 2026
    Smrithi null, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
    10 Jun 2026
    Author Response
    We sincerely thank Dr. Shanbhag for her constructive and expert review of our manuscript. We greatly appreciate her detailed and positive assessment of the study’s clinical relevance and structure, and ... Continue reading
Views
10
Cite
Reviewer Report 01 Apr 2026
I Ketut Alit Utamayasa, Children’s Health Sciences, Airlangga University Department of Children’s Health Sciences (Ringgold ID: 592763), East Java, Indonesia 
Prima Nastiti, Department of Pediatrics, Airlangga University (Ringgold ID: 148005), Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 10
This manuscript addresses an important and clinically relevant topic, namely the utility of systemic inflammatory indices in the early identification of neonatal sepsis in preterm infants. The study includes a reasonable sample size and applies commonly used indices (SII, SIRI, ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Utamayasa IKA and Nastiti P. Reviewer Report For: Accuracy of Systemic Inflammatory Indices in identifying Neonatal Sepsis in preterms in a tertiary care hospital in Mangalore [version 3; peer review: 4 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2026, 14:390 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.196572.r468911)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 10 Jun 2026
    Smrithi null, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
    10 Jun 2026
    Author Response
    We sincerely thank Reviewers Utamayasa and Nastiti for their thorough and constructive evaluation of the revised manuscript. Their expert commentary has helped us further strengthen the methodological and interpretive rigour ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 10 Jun 2026
    Smrithi null, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
    10 Jun 2026
    Author Response
    We sincerely thank Reviewers Utamayasa and Nastiti for their thorough and constructive evaluation of the revised manuscript. Their expert commentary has helped us further strengthen the methodological and interpretive rigour ... Continue reading
Views
8
Cite
Reviewer Report 05 Mar 2026
K. Shreedhara Avabratha, Father muller medical college, Mangalore, India 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 8
1.Do not see much improvement from earlier version
2. Introduction need to be crisp. Summary of evidence and need for study give a feel of dissertation presentation.
3. Which preterm neonates  are  excluded from the selected group?. Exclusion criteria ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Avabratha KS. Reviewer Report For: Accuracy of Systemic Inflammatory Indices in identifying Neonatal Sepsis in preterms in a tertiary care hospital in Mangalore [version 3; peer review: 4 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2026, 14:390 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.196572.r461444)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 10 Jun 2026
    Smrithi null, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
    10 Jun 2026
    Author Response
    We sincerely thank Dr. Avabratha for continued engagement with our manuscript and for the additional comments provided on Version 2. We address each point in detail below.
     
    REVIEWER COMMENT ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 10 Jun 2026
    Smrithi null, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
    10 Jun 2026
    Author Response
    We sincerely thank Dr. Avabratha for continued engagement with our manuscript and for the additional comments provided on Version 2. We address each point in detail below.
     
    REVIEWER COMMENT ... Continue reading
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 03 Apr 2025
Views
14
Cite
Reviewer Report 16 Jan 2026
K. Shreedhara Avabratha, Father muller medical college, Mangalore, India 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 14
1. Clarify when lab tests were collected ? Prior to confirmation of sepsis or after blood culture positivity?
2. What about culture negative clinical sepsis ?
3.Retrospective or prospective case control study ?
4. Sample size calculation ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Avabratha KS. Reviewer Report For: Accuracy of Systemic Inflammatory Indices in identifying Neonatal Sepsis in preterms in a tertiary care hospital in Mangalore [version 3; peer review: 4 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2026, 14:390 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.178518.r442649)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 23 Feb 2026
    Smrithi null, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
    23 Feb 2026
    Author Response
    We sincerely thank Dr Shreedhara Avabratha for taking the time to carefully evaluate our manuscript and for providing constructive and valuable comments. We greatly appreciate the insights and have addressed ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 23 Feb 2026
    Smrithi null, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
    23 Feb 2026
    Author Response
    We sincerely thank Dr Shreedhara Avabratha for taking the time to carefully evaluate our manuscript and for providing constructive and valuable comments. We greatly appreciate the insights and have addressed ... Continue reading
Views
16
Cite
Reviewer Report 23 Dec 2025
Dr Shashidhar A, St John's Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India 
Not Approved
VIEWS 16
Abstract
Background should clarify the need for the study. Can delete the rest. Study design to be stated. 
Give formulae for the indices in methods. Data should be in results. Avoid overconcluding- should be only based on the ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
A DS. Reviewer Report For: Accuracy of Systemic Inflammatory Indices in identifying Neonatal Sepsis in preterms in a tertiary care hospital in Mangalore [version 3; peer review: 4 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2026, 14:390 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.178518.r429880)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 23 Feb 2026
    Smrithi null, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
    23 Feb 2026
    Author Response
    We sincerely thank Dr. Shashidhar for taking the time to review our manuscript and provide detailed and constructive feedback. We greatly appreciate the suggestions, which have helped us improve the ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 23 Feb 2026
    Smrithi null, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
    23 Feb 2026
    Author Response
    We sincerely thank Dr. Shashidhar for taking the time to review our manuscript and provide detailed and constructive feedback. We greatly appreciate the suggestions, which have helped us improve the ... Continue reading
Views
17
Cite
Reviewer Report 23 Dec 2025
Sanjoy Kumer Dey, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Dhaka Division, Bangladesh 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 17
  • Sample size calculation needs to be detailed for better understanding. 
  • A flow chart could explain the total number of preterm newborns enrolled (population), cases  (culture positive) and control (culture negative).
  • Better to mention
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Kumer Dey S. Reviewer Report For: Accuracy of Systemic Inflammatory Indices in identifying Neonatal Sepsis in preterms in a tertiary care hospital in Mangalore [version 3; peer review: 4 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2026, 14:390 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.178518.r426933)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 23 Feb 2026
    Smrithi null, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
    23 Feb 2026
    Author Response
    We would like to express our gratitude to Dr. Sanjoy Kumer Dey for reviewing our article and offering helpful criticism. We are very grateful for the advice, which has improved ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 23 Feb 2026
    Smrithi null, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
    23 Feb 2026
    Author Response
    We would like to express our gratitude to Dr. Sanjoy Kumer Dey for reviewing our article and offering helpful criticism. We are very grateful for the advice, which has improved ... Continue reading

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 3
VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 03 Apr 2025
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.