Keywords
pericardial effusion, neonate, E coli, drainage
Pericardial effusion (PE) is a rare condition in neonates and usually due to central venous catheters. Infective pericarditis is an extremely rare condition in neonates.
We describe a case of a preterm neonate with infective Escherichia coli pericarditis.
A preterm female neonate born at 34 weeks of gestation with a birth weight of 1600 grams was admitted because of respiratory distress. The patient was managed using a high-flow nasal cannula. She did not receive a central venous catheter or antibiotics. The outcome was good and the patient was discharged on day 14. On day 18, she was readmitted because of fever and shortness of breath. Blood sample culture was positive for Escherichia coli. On day 21, the patient presented signs of heart failure. Chest radiography showed cardiomegaly. Cardiac ultrasound showed pre tamponade. Our patient was managed with pericardial drainage and cefotaxime administration. The outcome was good and further follow-up was unremarkable.
Even though rare, infective pericarditis should be suspected in neonates who show deterioration in respiratory and hemodynamic status even if they do not have central venous catheter.
pericardial effusion, neonate, E coli, drainage
Pericardial effusion (PE) is a rare condition in neonates and usually due to central venous catheters. Symptoms include difficulty to breath and fever. Without appropriate treatment, it can quickly progress to hemodynamic collapse, tamponade, and ultimately, death.
A preterm female infant and her twin sister were born at 34 weeks of gestation via an emergency caesarean section due to covid 19 infection in the mother. Serological and prenatal ultrasound findings were normal.
The first twin had severe respiratory distress and was referred to the PICU. The patient was discharged on day 10 of hospitalization. No further symptoms were noted.
Our patient was the second twin . Her birth weight was 1600 g, and Apgar score was 8 at 1 min and 9 at 10 min. She had moderate respiratory distress due to transient tachypnea in the newborn. She was placed on a high-flow nasal cannula for three days. Chest X ray was normal. The patient received fluids through a peripheral venous catheter. The patient did not receive any antibiotics. As her respiration improved, she was placed on room air, fluid infusion was discontinued, and she was gradually fed with milk formula. The patient was discharged on day 14. Four days later (on day 18), she presented to the emergency room with fever and dyspnea. Respiratory rate was 65/minute, she had retractions. Oxygen saturation was 97% in room air. The patient was placed on oxygen via a nasal cannula. Chest X ray was normal. Laboratory tests showed a leukocyte count of 26000/mm3 and an elevated reactive protein C level of 220 mg/l. Initially, a nosocomial infection was suspected, and the patient was received imipenem and amikacin.
On day 21, two blood cultures obtained on the day of readmission were positive for multidrug-sensitive Escherichia coli (E coli). The patient was then switched to cefotaxime. Two days later (on day 23), our patient developed signs of heart failure with tachycardia, hepatomegaly, tachypnea, and a capillary refill of 4 seconds. Chest radiography revealed significant cardiomegaly with a globular heart shape (Figure 1). ECG was normal. Cardiac ultrasound revealed pre tamponade. A pericardial drain was inserted surgically, and 8 ml of purulent fluid mixed with blood was aspirated. After pericardial drainage, the respiratory status improved, and the shape of the heart was normal on chest radiography (Figure 2). No bacteria were detected in pericardial fluid. The pericardial catheter was removed 10 days later. Cefotaxime was continued for a total duration of 14 days. The patient was discharged on day 35 of hospitalization. Further follow-up results were within normal limits.
Pericardial effusion (PE) is rare in neonates. Its clinical presentation depends on the speed and amount of fluid accumulation.1 This can lead to tamponade and even death. The most common cause is iatrogenic because of the central venous catheters.2
In a national American study of all cases of pericardial effusion, the lowest incidence was observed in neonates (0.04%).3 In a literature review, 34 patients were enrolled. The most common causes were central venous catheters (n = 21), Down syndrome (n = 3), and infections (n = 3). One of these patients had a positive blood culture for E. coli.2
Pericardial effusion due to an E. coli infection is rare. To date, only case reports have been published. In 1979, Wynn described purulent pericarditis in a 64 hours aged neonate. Autopsy confirmed the diagnosis of pericardial effusion, and E coli was isolated from the blood culture.4 In 2006, Benjamin described pericarditis in a 10 days old boy. E. coli was isolated from blood samples obtained in the emergency room before referral. He was managed with pericardectomy, pericardial drainage, cefotaxime, and indomethacin. The intraoperative samples were negative.
The management of PE is variable, from surveillance in small asymptomatic effusions to pericardiocentesis, pericardectomy, and pericardial drainage.2,5 In an American retrospective cohort, pericardial drainage was performed in 8.5% of neonates.3
Outcomes in case reports of infective pericarditis in neonates were good, except in the case of postmortem diagnosis.4 In an American study, the overall mortality was 6.8%, and mortality was the highest among neonates (12.4%).3
Although neonatal pericardial effusion is rare, it should be considered in neonates with cardiac failure, especially in the context of infection. This diagnosis should be considered in neonates who develop signs of deterioration even if they have no central venous catheters. Infective pericarditis in neonates is a rare condition. Management depends on tolerance of the effusion. Mortality was higher in neonates than in the other age groups.
Use of AI tools: The authors did not use AI technology in the writing process.
Approval of the local ethics committee of Bechir Hamza Hospital was obtained (n°13/2022). Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s guardian for the publication of clinical details.
All data underlying the results are available as part of the article.
Figshare: CARE checklist for “Pericardial effusion in late onset neonatal Esherichia coli sepsis”. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29611250.v26
All Data are available under the terms of Creative Common Zero (CC0).
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?
Yes
Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?
Partly
Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?
Partly
Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?
Partly
References
1. McLennan D, Morgan G: Infective Endocarditis, a Rare Complication of Late Neonatal Group B Strep Sepsis. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2018; 6. Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Paediatric cardiology, Neonatology, Infectious disease, Nutrition
Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?
Yes
Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?
Partly
Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?
Partly
Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Paediatric Hematology, Pulmonology, Cardiology, Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 2 (revision) 09 Sep 25 |
||
Version 1 06 Aug 25 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)