Keywords
Pain, Neuropathic Pain, Congenital Insensitivity to Pain, Channelopathy
This article is included in the Ion channels in somatosensory transmission collection.
Pain, Neuropathic Pain, Congenital Insensitivity to Pain, Channelopathy
The revised version includes a broader discussion of the concept of pain when expressed by a person with congenital insensitivity to pain. It includes our patient's DN4 neuropathic pain questionnaire results, and the intensity of the pain she experiences on a numeric rating scale. We have also made corrections and additions according the reviewers' comments.
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Frank van Eijs
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Juan D. Ramirez
There has been an explosion of interest in Nav1.7 as a potential therapeutic target for novel analgesics, as mutations in SCN9A are associated with profoundly altered pain thresholds1. Perhaps the greatest level of interest has been reserved for those very rare individuals with autosomal recessive mutations that truncate the protein Nav1.7 resulting in a complete lack of expression of the ion channel. The result is Channelopathy-associated Insensitivity to Pain (CIP) Syndrome: a complete absence of pain sensation, while all other sensory modalities apart from the sense of smell remain intact. Here we describe the experiences of a Caucasian 37-year-old patient with CIP whose older sister, but neither of her parents or other family members, is also affected. Other than a variety of injuries to the cornea and tongue, burns and relatively minor fractures sustained during childhood and now ascribed to CIP, there was no other medical history of note. Nonetheless, after childbirth she developed symptoms that she now readily describes as pain, and which has neuropathic features. We believe that this case report provides insights into the mechanisms of neuropathic pain, dissecting “positive” from “negative” symptomatology, and shows that it is possible to experience neuropathic pain in the absence of prior experience of acute pain.
Our patient had been recognized as having CIP aged 7, diagnosed at the same time as her older sister and confirmed 18 years later by finding bi-allelic heterozygous null mutations of SCN9A in exon 29 (c.4975T>A p.K1659X) and exon 22 (c.3699-3709delATGGATAGCAT p.I1235LfsX2). The SCN9A gene on chromosome 2q24.3 encodes the alpha-subunit of the Nav1.7 voltage-gated sodium channel, which is expressed at high levels in small-diameter peripheral nociceptive neurons2.
She sustained painless pelvic fractures, presumably during labor, which were not recognized for two months. By then, examination revealed significant weakness in both legs, worse on the right, and with both ankle reflexes absent. We subsequently compared the results of formal quantitative sensory testing three months post-injury to those obtained four years pre-injury. Sensory thresholds to heat and cold in the foot dorsum were broadly similar on both sides (Table 1), and should be interpreted in the context of someone who has never felt pain. However, thresholds to mechanical (von Frey) stimulation of the dorsum of both feet were increased more than 10-fold bilaterally. Imaging studies revealed multiple fractures of both sacral wings and of the superior and inferior pubic rami bilaterally (Figure 1a). Furthermore, there was an extensive hematoma extending into the left iliopsoas, right obturator externus and spinal canal, causing occlusion of the thecal sac at the level of the fifth lumbar (L5) and first sacral (S1) intervertebral space (Figure 1b, 1c and 1d). The fractures were attributed to transient osteoporosis of pregnancy, and their severity to her continued walking in the face of CIP. However, shortly after the fractures were diagnosed, bone densitometry studies and all serum bone profile results were found to be normal.
a) an anteroposterior X-ray outlet view of the patient’s pelvis showing multiple fractures of the superior and inferior pubic rami; b) axial T2-weighted non-enhanced magnetic resonance image plus magnification showing hematoma adjacent to the right L5 nerve root at the exit foramen (arrow); c) a more cranial axial view showing the extent of the pelvic hematoma, and d) a sagittal view at the right exit foramina showing hematoma around the distal cauda equina.
Two months later, four months after delivery, she reported troubling continuous buzzing and electric shocks in both legs, and a vice-like squeezing in the pelvis when she walked: symptoms that are consistent with neuropathic pain3. These symptoms did not respond to the anti-neuropathic drug gabapentin, and persist six years after the delivery. Further treatment has focused on physiotherapy and conservative measures such as pacing and activity management.
Neuropathic pain arises as a direct consequence of a lesion or disease affecting the somatosensory system, and is characterized according to four criteria: pain distribution; the link between distribution and history; confirmatory tests of neurologic status demonstrating sensory signs confined to the territory of the lesioned nerve, and further confirmatory diagnostic tests to identify the lesion or disease entity underlying the neuropathic pain3. The history, examination and investigations that we have described fulfill these criteria. We therefore believe that this patient has definite neuropathic pain, although it is manifested mostly by numbness, tingling, electric shocks and pressure, rather than stabbing or burning, but is nonetheless becoming increasingly debilitating.
It could be argued that the sensations described by our patient do not represent pain as understood by those without CIP. The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP), however, defines pain as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage. The IASP also acknowledges that application of the word ‘pain’ is learnt in early life (http://www.iasp-pain.org/Taxonomy?navItemNumber=576#Pain). There is psychometric and neuroimaging evidence that patients with CIP understand what the word ‘pain’ means, as they are able to empathize with behavioral and verbal expressions of pain in normal individuals4.
Since her injury, our patient has started using a variety of means of describing pain with which most will be familiar. She reports that her right hip and pelvis still “hurt” a great deal, using descriptors such as “tight” and “aching”, and that she “suffers” if she walks too far or doesn’t wear an orthotic heel raise. At rest, these symptoms resolve, but she is left with “tingling”, “buzzing” and “electric shocks”. Furthermore she also describes headaches that respond to acetaminophen, “the sting of a graze”, “the sharpness of an exposed gum”, and “back aches”, “period pains” and “stomach cramps” that arose after pregnancy.
Our patient has also exhibited behavior consistent with a person in pain. She sought treatment in the local Pain Clinic (with DWW) for her symptoms, which suggests that these “buzzing” and “vice-like” descriptors had strong aversive-motivational qualities. We contend that these descriptions, in the context of the injury sustained and the resultant behaviors, are adequate to fulfill the IASP definition of pain, and have acknowledged and managed her report of pain as such.
A visual analog or numeric rating scale (NRS) is undoubtedly useful in normal individuals, and our patient rates her current pain intensity in the right hip and leg as between 0 and 4 on a 10-point NRS. However, the scale should not be required to validate the report of pain by this patient. Our patient currently scores 5 in the Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) diagnostic neuropathic pain questionnaire, answering ‘yes’ to the presence of electric shocks, tingling and numbness, and having documented hypoesthesia to touch and pinprick in the affected area five years after the original injury5. A score >4 provides 90% specificity for neuropathic pain in individuals with premorbid normal nociceptive physiology, but we judge that the diagnosis of neuropathic pain in our patient stands independently of the DN4 score, and question the value of neuropathic pain questionnaires in patients with CIP.
The Nav1.7 channel plays a crucial role in pain transmission; however, this case shows that neuropathic pain can be initiated and maintained in its absence in humans, as well as in knockout mice6, although we cannot rule out that Nav1.7 may mediate sharp or burning sensations. Our data provide a further rational basis for seeking specific molecular substrates for neuropathic pain, some of which could act as mechanistic targets for new therapies for patients with symptoms of neuropathic pain.
All authors conceived the paper. MCL undertook the post-injury quantitative sensory testing and CGW the SCN9A genotyping. DWW wrote the first draft and final version, which was reviewed, revised and approved by all authors.
We are indebted to the late Dr David Bowsher, who kindly shared his pre-injury quantitative sensory testing data. We are grateful to our patient, who gave written consent for the publication of this report.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 2 (revision) 19 Jun 15 |
read | read |
Version 1 26 Jun 14 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)